Clinical Value of Cytokine Assay in Diagnosis and Severity Assessment of Lung Cancer

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate blood levels of interleukin-6 in lung cancer patients

Introduction

The exact mechanism responsible for inflammation in malignancy is not completely understood, but it is possible that interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a major role in triggering and maintaining an inflammatory response.

Aim

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the levels of IL-6 in the serum/plasma of lung cancer (LC) patients.

Material and methods

The researchers searched four databases up to September 11, 2022, to find studies that reported on IL-6 levels in LC patients compared to healthy controls (HCs). They calculated effect sizes using standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). To evaluate the quality of each study, they used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). They performed subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression analysis, heterogeneity analyses, trial sequential analysis, and publication bias with the trim-and-fill method.

Results

The meta-analysis included 28 studies, and the results showed that the pooled SMD was 1.71 (95% CI: 1.22, 2.19; p < 0.00001; I2 = 98%), indicating that LC patients had significantly higher levels of IL-6 in their serum/plasma than HCs.

Conclusions

The study found that the publication year and quality score of the studies were positively associated with the level of IL-6, while the sample size was inversely related. The research suggests that measuring IL-6 levels in the blood could be useful for detecting and monitoring LC as it appears to be a reliable biomarker.

Retracted: Clinical Value of Cytokine Assay in Diagnosis and Severity Assessment of Lung Cancer

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2022/4641600.].

Serum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Levels of Cytokines in Patients with Lung Cancer and Chronic Lung Disease: A Prospective Comparative Study

The role of chronic inflammation in the initiation and progression of carcinogenesis has been well-established in previous studies, particularly in the stages of malignant conversion, invasion, and metastasis. This study aimed to explore the potential correlation between the levels of cytokines in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) by comparing their levels between patients with lung cancer and those with benign lung diseases. The study measured the concentration of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-12p70, in venous blood and BALF of a total of 33 patients with lung cancer and 33 patients with benign lung diseases. Significant differences were found between the two groups in various clinical parameters. The cytokine levels were significantly higher among patients with malignant disease, while the BALF analysis revealed higher cytokine levels compared with serum analysis. It was discovered that the levels of cancer-specific cytokines in the lavage fluid increased significantly sooner and were present at a greater concentration than those in the peripheral blood. After one month of treatment, the serum markers decreased significantly but slower in the lavage fluid. The differences between serum and BALF markers remained significant. It was observed that the highest correlation was among IL-6 (serum) and IL-6 (lavage), with a coefficient of 0.774 (p-value < 0.001), and IL-1 (serum) and IL-1β (lavage), with a coefficient value of 0.610 (p-value < 0.001). Other significant correlations among serum and lavage cytokines were observed between IL-6 (lavage) and IL-1 (serum) (rho = 0.631, p-value < 0.001) and CRP (rho = 0.428, p-value = 0.001), respectively. This study revealed significant differences and correlations in clinical parameters, serum markers, and BALF inflammatory markers between patients with lung cancer and those with benign lung pathologies. The results highlight the importance of understanding the inflammatory profiles of these conditions and could contribute to the development of targeted therapies or diagnostic approaches in the future. Further research is needed to validate these findings, explore their implications for clinical practice, and determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of these cytokines for lung cancer.

The Association of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and Interleukins in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid with Lung Cancer: A Prospective Analysis

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Identifying novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers is essential for improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the predictive role of cytokines from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis. A prospective study was conducted on 33 patients with suspected lung cancer, divided into inflammatory and non-inflammatory BALF groups. Inflammatory markers in BALF were assessed, and their association with lung cancer risk was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plot analysis, sensitivity and specificity percentages, and regression analysis. Statistically significant differences were observed between the inflammatory and non-inflammatory groups for several inflammatory markers, including IFN-gamma, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-12p70. In the follow-up analysis, significant differences persisted for IFN-gamma, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-6. ROC plot analysis revealed that IL-12p70 had the highest area under the curve (AUC) value (0.702), followed by IL-2 (0.682), IL-6 (0.620), IL-4 (0.611), TNF-alpha (0.609), IL-10 (0.604), IL-1b (0.635), and IFN-gamma (0.521). IL-6 showed the highest sensitivity (73%), and IL-1b had the highest specificity (69%). Regression analysis demonstrated that IL-6 (cut-off = 25 pg/mL) and IL-12p70 (cut-off = 30 pg/mL) had the highest odds ratios for lung cancer risk, at 5.09 (95% CI: 2.38-9.24, p < 0.001) and 4.31 (95% CI: 1.85-8.16, p < 0.001), respectively. Cytokines from BALF, particularly IL-6 and IL-12p70, show potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for lung cancer. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these findings and elucidate the clinical implications of these markers in lung cancer management.