1
|
Nachira D, Punzo G, Calabrese G, Sessa F, Congedo MT, Beccia G, Aceto P, Kuzmych K, Cambise C, Sassorossi C, Nocera A, Senatore A, Vita ML, Meacci E, Sollazzi L, Margaritora S. The Efficacy of Continuous Serratus Anterior and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks vs Intercostal Nerve Block in Uniportal-Vats Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Prospective Trial. J Clin Med 2024; 13:606. [PMID: 38276112 PMCID: PMC10816358 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of continuous erector spinae plane block(c-ESPB) and serratus anterior plane block(c-SAPB) versus the intercostal nerve block (ICNB) in Uniportal-VATS in terms of pain control, drug consumption, and complications. METHODS Ninety-three consecutive patients, undergone one of the three peripheral nerve blocks after Uniportal-VATS, were prospectively enrolled. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to minimize bias. RESULTS C-ESPB and c-SAPB groups had no difference in morphine request upon awakening compared to ICNB. A higher VAS-score was recorded in c-ESPB compared to ICNB in the first 12 h after surgery. A significantly lower consumption of paracetamol in II postoperative day (p.o.d.) and tramadol in I and II p.o.d. was recorded in the c-ESPB group compared to the ICNB group. A higher dynamic VAS score was recorded at 24 h and 48 h in the ICNB group compared to the c-SAPB. No difference was found in safety, VAS-score and drug consumption between c-ESPB and c-SAPB at any given time, except for a higher tramadol request in c-SAPB in II p.o.d. CONCLUSIONS C-ESPB and c-SAPB appear to have the same safety and analgesic efficacy when compared between them and to ICNB in Uniportal-VATS approach. C-ESPB showed a delayed onset of analgesic effect and a lower postoperative drug consumption compared to ICNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dania Nachira
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.T.C.); (K.K.); (C.S.); (A.N.); (S.M.)
| | - Giovanni Punzo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (G.B.); (P.A.); (C.C.); (L.S.)
| | - Giuseppe Calabrese
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.T.C.); (K.K.); (C.S.); (A.N.); (S.M.)
| | - Flaminio Sessa
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (G.B.); (P.A.); (C.C.); (L.S.)
| | - Maria Teresa Congedo
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.T.C.); (K.K.); (C.S.); (A.N.); (S.M.)
| | - Giovanna Beccia
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (G.B.); (P.A.); (C.C.); (L.S.)
| | - Paola Aceto
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (G.B.); (P.A.); (C.C.); (L.S.)
| | - Khrystyna Kuzmych
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.T.C.); (K.K.); (C.S.); (A.N.); (S.M.)
| | - Chiara Cambise
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (G.B.); (P.A.); (C.C.); (L.S.)
| | - Carolina Sassorossi
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.T.C.); (K.K.); (C.S.); (A.N.); (S.M.)
| | - Adriana Nocera
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.T.C.); (K.K.); (C.S.); (A.N.); (S.M.)
| | - Alessia Senatore
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.T.C.); (K.K.); (C.S.); (A.N.); (S.M.)
| | - Maria Letizia Vita
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.T.C.); (K.K.); (C.S.); (A.N.); (S.M.)
| | - Elisa Meacci
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.T.C.); (K.K.); (C.S.); (A.N.); (S.M.)
| | - Liliana Sollazzi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (G.B.); (P.A.); (C.C.); (L.S.)
| | - Stefano Margaritora
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.T.C.); (K.K.); (C.S.); (A.N.); (S.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muhammad QUA, Sohail MA, Azam NM, Bashir HH, Islam H, Ijaz R, Aquil S, Mansoor T, Dhakal B, Fatima T, Noor J, Khan AS, Iqbal A, Khatri M, Kumar S. Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae versus serratus anterior plane block in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, ANALGESIA AND CRITICAL CARE 2024; 4:3. [PMID: 38217050 PMCID: PMC10785351 DOI: 10.1186/s44158-023-00138-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) are regional anesthesia techniques that have shown favorable results in pain management following thoracic surgeries; however, their relative superiority is unclear. This review (PROSPERO: CRD42023443018) aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of ESPB and SAPB in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries through the pooled analysis of co-primary outcomes: postoperative oral-morphine-equivalent (mg) consumption in 24 h and pain scores (static) at 24 h. METHODS A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to May 2023, comparing ESPB and SAPB in thoracic surgeries. Statistical pooling was done using Review Manager 5.4.1. Bias assessment employed the Cochrane Collaboration Risk-of-Bias 2.0 tool. The strength of evidence was assessed using the guidelines from the GRADE working group. RESULTS Nine RCTs (485 patients) were included in the study. Postoperative pain scores (static) at 24 h (mean difference (MD) = - 0.31 [- 0.57, 0.05], p = 0.02) and postoperative oral-morphine-equivalent (mg) consumption in 24 h (MD = - 19.73 [- 25.65, - 13.80], p < 0.00001) were significantly lower in the ESBP group. However, the MDs did not exceed the set threshold for clinical importance. No significant differences were observed in the opioid-related adverse effects and block-related complications. CONCLUSION Our statistically significant results imply that ESPB has superior analgesic efficacy compared to SAPB; however, this difference is clinically unimportant. The safety profile of the two blocks is comparable; hence, current evidence cannot define the relative superiority of one block over the other. Our findings warrant further research with standardized methodologies and a longer duration of analgesic efficacy assessment to yield robust evidence for better clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qurat Ul Ain Muhammad
- Rawalpindi Medical University, Chamanzar Colony, Tipu Road, Rawalpindi, 46000, Pakistan.
| | | | - Noor Mahal Azam
- Rawalpindi Medical University, Chamanzar Colony, Tipu Road, Rawalpindi, 46000, Pakistan
| | | | - Hira Islam
- Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Rana Ijaz
- Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Sakina Aquil
- Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Bishal Dhakal
- Nepalese Army Institute of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | | | - Javeria Noor
- Rawalpindi Medical University, Chamanzar Colony, Tipu Road, Rawalpindi, 46000, Pakistan
| | - Alina Sami Khan
- Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Arham Iqbal
- Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Mahima Khatri
- Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Satesh Kumar
- Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alfaras-Melainis K, Fernando RJ, Boisen ML, Hoffman PJ, Rosenkrans DJ, Teeter E, Cardi AI, Laney J, Reagan A, Rao VK, Anderson M, Luke CB, Subramani S, Schisler T, Ritchie PJ, Gelzinis TA. The Year in Thoracic Anesthesia: Selected Highlights from 2022. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2024; 38:29-56. [PMID: 37802689 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
This article reviews research highlights in the field of thoracic anesthesia. The highlights of this year included new developments in the preoperative assessment and prehabilitation of patients requiring thoracic surgery, updates on the use of devices for one-lung ventilation (OLV) in adults and children, updates on the anesthetic and postoperative management of these patients, including protective OLV ventilation, the use of opioid-sparing techniques and regional anesthesia, and outcomes using enhanced recovery after surgery, as well as the use of expanding indications for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, specialized anesthetic techniques for airway surgery, and nonintubated video-assisted thoracic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rohesh J Fernando
- Cardiothoracic Section, Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Michael L Boisen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Paul J Hoffman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Emily Teeter
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Alessandra I Cardi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeremy Laney
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Aaron Reagan
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Vidya K Rao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Michael Anderson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY
| | - Charles B Luke
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sudhakar Subramani
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | - Travis Schisler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
| | - Peter J Ritchie
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Theresa A Gelzinis
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ashworth H, Tagg S, Anderson E. Ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) for acute scapula fracture in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 2024; 75:196.e5-196.e7. [PMID: 37923689 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proper pain in acute scapular fractures can be challenging to achieve due to their anatomy and location. While the current mainstay of treatment relies on opioids, the Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) has been utilized for anesthesia to effectively treat pain for scapular fractures. However, it has not yet been utilized in the emergency department (ED). CASE REPORT In this case report, we present the first documented use of RIB to treat pain safely and effectively in a 69-year-old male with a scapula fracture following a ground-level fall in the ED. The RIB was performed under ultrasound guidance, providing precise localization and administration of the nerve block. CONCLUSION The RIB demonstrated successful pain management in the ED. Although hopeful, further research is needed to understand limitations, potential side effects, length of pain control, and overall clinical outcomes of the RIB in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Ashworth
- Alameda Health System, Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, CA, USA.
| | - Spencer Tagg
- Alameda Health System, Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Erik Anderson
- Alameda Health System, Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Feray S, Lemoine A, Aveline C, Quesnel C. Pain management after thoracic surgery or chest trauma. Minerva Anestesiol 2023; 89:1022-1033. [PMID: 37671536 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.23.17291-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
Accidental or surgically induced thoracic trauma is responsible for significant pain that can impact patient outcomes. One of the main objectives of its pain management is to promote effective coughing and early mobilization to reduce atelectasis and ventilation disorders induced by pulmonary contusion. The incidence of chronic pain can affect more than 35% of patients after both thoracotomy and thoracoscopy as well as after chest trauma. As the severity of acute pain is associated with the incidence of chronic pain, early and effective pain management is very important. In this narrative review, we propose to detail systemic and regional analgesia techniques to minimize postoperative pain, while reducing transitional pain, surgical stress response and opioid side effects. We provide the reader with practical recommendations based on both literature and clinical practice experience in a referral level III thoracic trauma center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Feray
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France -
| | - Adrien Lemoine
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Aveline
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Sévigné Hospital, Cesson Sévigné, France
| | - Christophe Quesnel
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Azem K, Mangoubi E, Zribi B, Fein S. Regional analgesia for lung transplantation: A narrative review. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2023; 40:643-651. [PMID: 37232676 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Lung transplantation (LTx) is the definitive treatment for end-stage pulmonary disease. About 4500 LTxs are performed annually worldwide. It is considered challenging and complex surgery regarding anaesthesia and pain management. While providing adequate analgesia is crucial for patient comfort, early mobilisation and prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications, standardising an analgesic protocol is challenging due to the diversity of aetiologies, surgical approaches and the potential use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Although thoracic epidural analgesia is commonly considered the gold standard, concerns regarding procedural safety and its potential for devastating consequences have led physicians to seek safer analgesic modalities such as thoracic nerve blocks. The advantages of thoracic nerve blocks for general thoracic surgery are well established. However, their utility in LTx remains unclear. Considering paucity of relevant literature, this review aims to raise awareness about the literature gap in the field and highlight the need for further high-quality studies determining the effectiveness of available techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karam Azem
- From the Department of Anaesthesia, Rabin Medical Centre, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva (KA, EM. BZ, SF) and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (KA, EM. BZ, SF)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Elhouty MG, Elbahrawy K, Elawady MS. Rhomboid intercostal block versus serratus block for postoperative analgesia after thoracoscopic sympathectomy for primary palmar hyperhidrosis: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:241. [PMID: 37468840 PMCID: PMC10355006 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02203-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although thoracoscopic sympathectomy is made via small incisions, it is associated with severe postoperative pain. Both Rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) and serratus anterior plane block (SABP) are recent techniques used for pain control after such procedures. Herein, we compared RIB and SAPB regarding pain control in patients undergoing thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three groups were enrolled in this prospective randomized study (71 patients in each group); Group S received SAPB, Group R received RIB and Group C as controls. The block procedures were performed after general anesthesia and prior to the skin incision. RESULTS The three groups showed comparable demographics and operative time (P ˃ 0.05). Pain scores showed a significant decline with the two block procedures compared to controls during the first day following surgery (both P ˂ 0.05), but Group R had better scores compared to Group S. Both block techniques were associated with a significant prolongation of the time to first rescue analgesic and less fentanyl consumption compared to controls (both P ˂ 0.05). However, both parameters were improved with RIB rather than SAPB (both P ˂ 0.05). Both blocks led to a significant improvement in patient satisfaction than in the control group (both P ˂ 0.05), but it was comparable between the two approaches (P ˃ 0.05). CONCLUSION Both RIB and SAPB are safe and effective in pain reduction after thoracoscopic sympathectomy procedures in patients with hyperhidrosis. Moreover, RIB is superior to SAPB as it is associated with better analgesic outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Pan African Trial Registry PACTR202203766891354. https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/Researcher/TrialRegister.aspx?TrialID=21522.
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen S, Guo Z, Wei X, Chen Z, Liu N, Yin W, Lan L. Efficacy of preemptive intercostal nerve block on recovery in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic lobectomy. J Cardiothorac Surg 2023; 18:168. [PMID: 37118846 PMCID: PMC10148478 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-023-02243-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preemptive intercostal nerve block (pre-ICNB) achieves the same analgesic effects as postoperative ICNB (post-ICNB) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive ICNB on perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). METHODS This was a randomized, open-label study (ChiCTR2200055667) from August 1, 2021, to December 30, 2021. Eligible patients scheduled for lobectomy for lung cancer were allocated into the pre-ICNB group and the post-ICNB group. The postoperative pain evaluation, patient rehabilitation, and opioid consumption were observed. RESULTS A total of 81 patients were included. When compared with the post-ICNB group, the pre-ICNB group had a lower proportion of hypertension comorbidity (P = 0.023), significantly lower total consumption of morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) (P = 0.016), shorter extubation time (P = 0.019). The pre-ICNB group has similar Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) scores of dynamic pain in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), postoperative 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h (P > 0.05), and had simialr scores of Bruggrmann Comfort Scale (BCS) in postoperative 6 h, 12 h, 24 and 48 h (P > 0.05). The scores of the Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Ramsay in the pre-ICNB group were comparable to those in the post-ICNB group, except the scores of MMSE and Ramsay in postoperative 6 h were lower (P = 0.048 and P = 0.019). The pain evaluation in the 1-month follow-up was comparable with that in the post-ICBN group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Pre- ICNB is equally efficacious in perioperative pain management as post-ICNB, and pre-ICNB significantly reduces intra-operative opioid consumption, providing faster recovery in PACU. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR2200055667).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaojuan Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhihua Guo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin Wei
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenzhu Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Na Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weiqiang Yin
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Lan Lan
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ahiskalioglu A, Yayik AM, Celik EC, Enes Aydin M, Ciftci B, Oral Ahiskalioglu E, Bilal B, Narayanan M, Tulgar S. The Shining Star of the Last Decade in Regional Anesthesia Part-I: Interfascial Plane Blocks for Breast, Thoracic, and Orthopedic Surgery. Eurasian J Med 2022; 54:97-105. [PMID: 36655452 PMCID: PMC11163362 DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Regional anesthesia has benefits beyond just treating acute postoperative pain. Interfascial plane blocks, which have been very popular with ultrasound in recent years, function primarily by administering a high volume of a local anesthetic to the fascial plane. Contrary to traditional peripheral nerve blocks, the targeted nerve or structure in interfacial plane blocks is not fully defined, and the indications have not been fully revealed yet. Anatomical, cadaveric, and radiological studies show how effective the interfascial plane blocks play a role. This review focuses on the benefits, techniques, indications, and complications of interfascial plane blocks in the context of breast, thoracic, and orthopedic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Ahiskalioglu
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
- Clinical Research, Development and Design Application and Research Center, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Murat Yayik
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
- Clinical Research, Development and Design Application and Research Center, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Erkan Cem Celik
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
- Clinical Research, Development and Design Application and Research Center, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Muhammed Enes Aydin
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
- Clinical Research, Development and Design Application and Research Center, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Bahadir Ciftci
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Elif Oral Ahiskalioglu
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Bora Bilal
- Department of Anesthesia and Reanimation, Kahramanmaras Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey
| | - Madan Narayanan
- Department of Anaesthesia, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, UK
| | - Serkan Tulgar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|