Chromatin Rewiring by Mismatch Repair Protein MSH2 Alters Cell Adhesion Pathways and Sensitivity to BET Inhibition in Gastric Cancer

Efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Recent phase III randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve prognosis in advanced HER-2-negative gastric cancer patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) higher than 5. However, these findings are not confirmed in real-world settings, and the benefits in PD-L1 CPS < 5 patients remain controversial.

METHODS

In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, data from across thirteen medical centers were analyzed by inverse probability of treatment weighting for matching, alongside univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazard regression models. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses were conducted to identify efficacy prognostic models and resistance mechanisms.

RESULTS

This study included 573 patients with advanced gastric cancer, 265 treated with chemotherapy and 308 with ICIs plus chemotherapy. In the overall cohort and HER-2-negative patients, the combination therapy significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival, without marked increases in severe adverse events. Notably, patients with PD-L1 CPS 1-4 showed significant overall survival prolongation and a trend towards improved progression-free survival with combination therapy. Patients with unknown PD-L1 status also benefitted from ICIs. SMARCA4 and BRCA2 mutations were more frequent in patients with responses, while CCNE1 and ZFHX3 alternation, alongside high "ABC transporters" signatures, were more common in non-responsive patients. A novel risk model, PGFIC, outperformed traditional biomarkers in predicting treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding ICIs to first-line treatment significantly prolongs survival in overall patients and in those with PD-L1 CPS 1-4 or unknown. This study also provides valuable insights into prognostic markers and resistance mechanisms, potentially guiding immunotherapy strategies.

Screening high-risk individuals for primary gastric adenocarcinoma: evaluating progression-free survival probability score in the presence and absence of Rictor expression after gastrectomy

Objective

Developing nomogram-based risk stratification model to determine 3-year and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and to identify high-risk patients with gastric adenocarcinoma based on different Rictor statuses.

Methods

1366 individuals who underwent radical gastric surgery to treat gastric adenocarcinoma at Shanxi Cancer Hospital from May 2002 to December 2020 were analyzed. Cox regression analysis was employed to create the nomograms. The nomograms' performance was assessed using C-index, time receiver operating characteristic (t-ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves in training and validation cohorts. Subsequently, patients were categorized into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the nomogram's risk scores.

Results

The Rictor (-) nomogram for predicting PFS included variables such as age, number of positive lymph nodes, vascular invasion, maximum diameter of the tumor, omentum metastasis, and expression of MSH2. In the internal validation, the C-index of the Rictor (-) nomogram was 0.760 (95%CI: 0.720-0.799), which was superior to the C-index of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition TNM staging (0.683, 95%CI: 0.646-0.721). Similarly, the Rictor (+) nomogram for predicting PFS included variables such as gender, age, pT stage, number of positive lymph nodes, neural invasion, maximum diameter of the tumor, omentum metastasis, Clavien-Dindo classification for complications, and CGA expression. The C-index of the Rictor (+) nomogram was 0.795 (95%CI: 0.764-0.825), which outperformed the C-index of the AJCC 8th edition TNM staging (0.693, 95%CI: 0.662-0.723). The calibration curves, t-ROC curves, and decision curve analysis for both nomogram models demonstrated their excellent prediction ability.

Conclusion

This study presents the first risk stratification for Rictor status in gastric adenocarcinoma. Our model identifies low-risk patients who may not require additional postoperative treatment, while high-risk patients should consider targeted therapies that specifically target Rictor-positive indicators.

Potent therapeutic strategy in gastric cancer with microsatellite instability-high and/or deficient mismatch repair

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common malignancy that presents challenges in patient care worldwide. The mismatch repair (MMR) system is a highly conserved DNA repair mechanism that protects genome integrity during replication. Deficient MMR (dMMR) results in an increased accumulation of genetic errors in microsatellite sequences, leading to the development of a microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype. Most MSI-H/dMMR GCs arise sporadically, mainly due to MutL homolog 1 (MLH1) epigenetic silencing. Unlike microsatellite-stable (MSS)/proficient MMR (pMMR) GCs, MSI-H/dMMR GCs are relatively rare and represent a distinct subtype with genomic instability, a high somatic mutational burden, favorable immunogenicity, different responses to treatment, and prognosis. dMMR/MSI-H status is a robust predictive biomarker for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) due to high neoantigen load, prominent tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) overexpression. However, a subset of MSI-H/dMMR GC patients does not benefit from immunotherapy, highlighting the need for further research into predictive biomarkers and resistance mechanisms. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical, molecular, immunogenic, and therapeutic aspects of MSI-H/dMMR GC, with a focus on the impact of ICIs in immunotherapy and their potential as neoadjuvant therapies. Understanding the complexity and diversity of the molecular and immunological profiles of MSI-H/dMMR GC will drive the development of more effective therapeutic strategies and molecular targets for future precision medicine.

Epigenetic reprogramming in gastrointestinal cancer: biology and translational perspectives

Gastrointestinal tumors, the second leading cause of human mortality, are characterized by their association with inflammation. Currently, progress in the early diagnosis and effective treatment of gastrointestinal tumors is limited. Recent whole-genome analyses have underscored their profound heterogeneity and extensive genetic and epigenetic reprogramming. Epigenetic reprogramming pertains to dynamic and hereditable alterations in epigenetic patterns, devoid of concurrent modifications in the underlying DNA sequence. Common epigenetic modifications encompass DNA methylation, histone modifications, noncoding RNA, RNA modifications, and chromatin remodeling. These modifications possess the potential to invoke or suppress a multitude of genes associated with cancer, thereby governing the establishment of chromatin configurations characterized by diverse levels of accessibility. This intricate interplay assumes a pivotal and indispensable role in governing the commencement and advancement of gastrointestinal cancer. This article focuses on the impact of epigenetic reprogramming in the initiation and progression of gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, and colorectal cancer, as well as other uncommon gastrointestinal tumors. We elucidate the epigenetic landscape of gastrointestinal tumors, encompassing DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling, and their interrelationships. Besides, this review summarizes the potential diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic targets in epigenetic reprogramming, with the aim of assisting clinical treatment strategies.

Targeting SWI/SNF Complexes in Cancer: Pharmacological Approaches and Implications

SWI/SNF enzymes are heterogeneous multi-subunit complexes that utilize the energy from ATP hydrolysis to remodel chromatin structure, facilitating transcription, DNA replication, and repair. In mammalian cells, distinct sub-complexes, including cBAF, ncBAF, and PBAF exhibit varying subunit compositions and have different genomic functions. Alterations in the SWI/SNF complex and sub-complex functions are a prominent feature in cancer, making them attractive targets for therapeutic intervention. Current strategies in cancer therapeutics involve the use of pharmacological agents designed to bind and disrupt the activity of SWI/SNF complexes or specific sub-complexes. Inhibitors targeting the catalytic subunits, SMARCA4/2, and small molecules binding SWI/SNF bromodomains are the primary approaches for suppressing SWI/SNF function. Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) were generated by the covalent linkage of the bromodomain or ATPase-binding ligand to an E3 ligase-binding moiety. This engineered connection promotes the degradation of specific SWI/SNF subunits, enhancing and extending the impact of this pharmacological intervention in some cases. Extensive preclinical studies have underscored the therapeutic potential of these drugs across diverse cancer types. Encouragingly, some of these agents have progressed from preclinical research to clinical trials, indicating a promising stride toward the development of effective cancer therapeutics targeting SWI/SNF complex and sub-complex functions.

Super-enhancers: Implications in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most prevalent malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Despite intensive efforts to enhance the efficiencies of various therapeutics (chemotherapy, surgical interventions, molecular-targeted therapies, immunotherapies), the prognosis for patients with GC remains poor. This might be predominantly due to the limited understanding of the complicated etiology of GC. Importantly, epigenetic modifications and alterations are crucial during GC development. Super-enhancers (SEs) are a large cluster of adjacent enhancers that greatly activate transcription. SEs sustain cell-specific identity by enhancing the transcription of specific oncogenes. In this review, we systematically summarize how SEs are involved in GC development, including the SE landscape in GC, the SE target genes in GC, and the interventions related to SE functions for treating GC.

Exogenous melatonin enhances the tolerance of tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus L.) via DNA damage repair pathway under heavy metal stress (Cd2+) at the sprout stage

Heavy metal (HM) stress is a non-negligible abiotic stress that seriously restricts crop yield and quality, while the sprout stage is the most sensitive to stress and directly impacts the growth and development of the later stage. Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine), as an exogenous additive, enhances stress resistance due to its ability to oxidize and reduce. However, few reports on exogenous melatonin to tiger nuts under HM stress have explored whether exogenous melatonin enhances plants' resistance to heavy metals. Here, "Jisha 2″ was used as material, with a stress concentration of 5 mg/L and 100 μmol/L of CdCl2 to explore whether exogenous melatonin enhances plant resistance and molecular mechanism. The result revealed that stress limits growth, while melatonin alleviated the sprout damage under stress from the phenotypes. Moreover, stress-enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and membrane lipid peroxidation, while melatonin-increased ROS reduce damage via the analysis of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anion (O2-), and Electrolyte leakage (El). Further results indicated that HM leads to DNA damage while exogenous melatonin will repair the damage by analyzing random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), DNA cross-linking, 8-hydroxy-20-deoxyguanine level, and relative density of apurinic sites. Furthermore, gene expression in the DNA-repaired pathway exhibited similar results. These results applied that exogenous melatonin released the hurt caused by HM stress, with DNA repair and ROS balance serving as candidate pathways. This study elucidated the mechanism of melatonin's influence and provided theoretical insights into its application in tiger nuts.

Super-enhancer landscape rewiring in cancer: The epigenetic control at distal sites

Super-enhancers evolve as elements at the top of the hierarchical control of gene expression. They are important end-gatherers of signaling pathways that control stemness, differentiation or adaptive responses. Many epigenetic regulations focus on these regions, and not surprisingly, during the process of tumorigenesis, various alterations can account for their dysfunction. Super-enhancers are emerging as key drivers of the aberrant gene expression landscape that sustain the aggressiveness of cancer cells. In this review, we will describe and discuss about the structure of super-enhancers, their epigenetic regulation, and the major changes affecting their functionality in cancer.

CK2 and the Hallmarks of Cancer

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. Casein kinase 2 (CK2) is commonly dysregulated in cancer, impacting diverse molecular pathways. CK2 is a highly conserved serine/threonine kinase, constitutively active and ubiquitously expressed in eukaryotes. With over 500 known substrates and being estimated to be responsible for up to 10% of the human phosphoproteome, it is of significant importance. A broad spectrum of diverse types of cancer cells has been already shown to rely on disturbed CK2 levels for their survival. The hallmarks of cancer provide a rationale for understanding cancer's common traits. They constitute the maintenance of proliferative signaling, evasion of growth suppressors, resisting cell death, enabling of replicative immortality, induction of angiogenesis, the activation of invasion and metastasis, as well as avoidance of immune destruction and dysregulation of cellular energetics. In this work, we have compiled evidence from the literature suggesting that CK2 modulates all hallmarks of cancer, thereby promoting oncogenesis and operating as a cancer driver by creating a cellular environment favorable to neoplasia.