Physical Activity and Risk of Ovarian Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study in the United States

Causal effects of physical activity on the risk of overall ovarian cancer: A Mendelian randomization study

Objective

Inconsistent results were reported on the association of physical activity with ovarian cancer. However, given the limitations of confounders and inverse causation, the validity of the association remained unclear. Therefore, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis, which can effectively avoid the aforementioned interference, to evaluate whether physical activity had a protective effect on ovarian cancer.

Methods

The exposure of interest was physical activity (both self-reported moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and accelerometer-measured physical activity). Summary statistics for physical activity traits were recruited from the UK Biobank (n  =  91,084-377,234), whereas ovarian cancer summary genetic data were obtained from a genome-wide association study involving 25,509 cases and 40,941 healthy individuals. The inverse variance weighted approach was used as the primary Mendelian randomization method. Sensitivity analyses using Mendelian randomization-Egger regression, weighted median, and Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier were also performed.

Results

The Mendelian randomization analyses indicated that there was no effect of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.85; P  =  0.702), accelerometer-measured "average acceleration" (0.99 [0.91-1.08]; P  =  0.848), and "overall activity" physical activity (0.97 [ 0.48-1.95]; P  =  0.927) on the risk of overall ovarian cancer. However, "overall accelerations" physical activity (0.18 [0.05-0.64]; P  =  0.008) were suggestively related to a lower risk of endometrioid ovarian cancer.

Conclusions

The Mendelian randomization analyses suggested that physical activity may not help to decrease the risk of overall ovarian cancer.

Lifetime recreational moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and ovarian cancer risk: A case-control study

Results of epidemiologic studies of physical activity and ovarian cancer risk are inconsistent. Few have attempted to measure physical activity over the lifetime or in specific age windows, which may better capture etiologically relevant exposures. We examined participation in moderate-to-vigorous recreational physical activity (MVPA) in relation to ovarian cancer risk. In a population-based case-control study conducted in Montreal, Canada from 2011 to 2016 (485 cases and 887 controls), information was collected on lifetime participation in various recreational physical activities, which was used to estimate MVPA for each participant. MVPA was represented as average energy expenditure over the lifetime and in specific age-periods in units of metabolic equivalents (METs)-hours per week. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the relation between average MVPA and ovarian cancer risk were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models. Confounding was assessed using directed acyclic graphs combined with a change-in-estimate approach. The adjusted OR (95% CI) for each 28.5 MET-hr/week increment of lifetime recreational MVPA was 1.11 (0.99-1.24) for ovarian cancer overall. ORs for individual age-periods were weaker. When examined by menopausal status, the OR (95% CI) for lifetime MVPA was 1.21 (1.00-1.45) for those diagnosed before menopause and 1.04 (0.89-1.21) for those diagnosed postmenopausally. The suggestive positive associations were stronger for invasive ovarian cancers and more specifically for high-grade serous carcinomas. These results do not support a reduced ovarian cancer risk associated with MVPA.

Physical activity, sitting time, and the risk of ovarian cancer: A brief research report employing a meta-analysis of existing

We investigated the associations between physical activity, physical inactivity, and ovarian cancer risk and identified the most effective physical activity intensity and amount to reduce ovarian cancer risk. Thirty-four studies were selected for the present meta-analysis. Physical activity helps decrease ovarian cancer risk. Moderate intensity and low amount of physical activity showed the greatest reduction of ovarian cancer risk and prolonged sitting time had the worst ovarian cancer risk. At least 2 h of moderate physical activity per week and <3 h of sitting time per day provided a preventive effect to ovarian cancer.

Physical activity and gynecologic cancer prevention

This chapter reviews the findings from epidemiologic studies of the associations of physical activity with gynecologic cancers, including those of the endometrium, ovaries, and cervix, and the biologic mechanisms mediating the associations. The epidemiologic evidence to date suggests that physical activity probably protects against endometrial cancer, with a risk reduction of about 20-30% for those with the highest levels of physical activity compared to those with the lowest levels, and that light to moderate physical activity including housework, gardening, or walking for transportation may reduce risk. The role of physical activity in ovarian cancer development remains uncertain, as findings from these studies have been inconsistent with about half the studies suggesting physical activity modestly decreases risk and about half the studies suggesting no association. A recent meta-analysis of studies examining recreational physical activity with ovarian cancer risk estimated a 20% reduced risk for the most active versus least active women. There is mounting evidence that sedentary behaviors such as sitting time probably increase risk of endometrial and ovarian cancers. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to draw a conclusion on a possible role of physical activity in the development of cervical cancer, although a modest influence on risk is possible through effects on sex steroid hormones and immune function. The biologic evidence provides strong support for a protective role of physical activity on cancer of the endometrium, and moderate support for cancer of the ovaries, as these cancers have a strong hormonal etiology. The more established biologic mechanisms that are supported by epidemiologic and experimental data involve endogenous sex hormone levels, insulin-mediated pathways, and maintenance of energy balance.In this chapter, we will discuss the evidence for an association of physical activity with gynecologic cancers including those of the endometrium, ovaries, and cervix. Cancers of the endometrium and ovaries have a strong hormonal etiology (Risch 1998; Kaaks et al. 2002; Lukanova and Kaaks 2005), and physical activity has been postulated as a potential modifiable risk factor for prevention of these cancers because it can influence circulating hormone levels, energy balance, and insulin-mediated pathways that are thought to be important mediators underlying the associations. Few studies have evaluated the association of physical activity with cervical cancer because the main causal factor is infection with certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV), although other hormonal and immune factors are also thought to play a role (Smith et al. 2003; Waggoner 2003). We review the findings from epidemiologic studies that have examined the associations of physical activity with gynecologic cancers, and the biologic mechanisms that might mediate the associations.

Energy intake, physical activity, energy balance, and cancer: epidemiologic evidence

Energy intake, physical activity, and obesity are modifiable lifestyle factors. This chapter reviews and summarizes the epidemiologic evidence on the relation of energy intake, physical activity, and obesity to cancer. High energy intake may increase the risk of cancers of colon-rectum, prostate (especially advanced prostate cancer), and breast. However, because physical activity, body size, and metabolic efficiency are highly related to total energy intake and expenditure, it is difficult to assess the independent effect of energy intake on cancer risk. There are sufficient evidences to support a role of physical activity in preventing cancers of the colon and breast, whereas the association is stronger in men than in women for colon cancer and in postmenopausal than in premenopausal women for breast cancer. The evidence also suggests that physical activity likely reduces the risk of cancers of endometrium, lung, and prostate (to a lesser extent). On the other hand, there is little or no evidence that the risk of rectal cancer is related to physical activity, whereas the results have been inconsistent regarding the association between physical activity and the risks of cancers of pancreas, ovary and kidney. Epidemiologic studies provide sufficient evidence that obesity is a risk factor for both cancer incidence and mortality. The evidence supports strong links of obesity with the risk of cancers of the colon, rectum, breast (in postmenopausal women), endometrium, kidney (renal cell), and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Epidemiologic evidence also indicates that obesity is probably related to cancers of the pancreas, liver, and gallbladder, and aggressive prostate cancer, while it seems that obesity is not associated with lung cancer. The role of obesity in other cancer risks is unclear.