Oral contraceptive use and survival in women with invasive breast cancer

Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Survival by Tumor Subtype: Pooled Analyses from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium

BACKGROUND

It is not known whether modifiable lifestyle factors that predict survival after invasive breast cancer differ by subtype.

METHODS

We analyzed data for 121,435 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 67 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium with 16,890 deaths (8,554 breast cancer specific) over 10 years. Cox regression was used to estimate associations between risk factors and 10-year all-cause mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality overall, by estrogen receptor (ER) status, and by intrinsic-like subtype.

RESULTS

There was no evidence of heterogeneous associations between risk factors and mortality by subtype (P adj > 0.30). The strongest associations were between all-cause mortality and BMI ≥30 versus 18.5-25 kg/m2 [HR (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19 (1.06-1.34)]; current versus never smoking [1.37 (1.27-1.47)], high versus low physical activity [0.43 (0.21-0.86)], age ≥30 years versus <20 years at first pregnancy [0.79 (0.72-0.86)]; >0-<5 years versus ≥10 years since last full-term birth [1.31 (1.11-1.55)]; ever versus never use of oral contraceptives [0.91 (0.87-0.96)]; ever versus never use of menopausal hormone therapy, including current estrogen-progestin therapy [0.61 (0.54-0.69)]. Similar associations with breast cancer mortality were weaker; for example, 1.11 (1.02-1.21) for current versus never smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm associations between modifiable lifestyle factors and 10-year all-cause mortality. There was no strong evidence that associations differed by ER status or intrinsic-like subtype.

IMPACT

Given the large dataset and lack of evidence that associations between modifiable risk factors and 10-year mortality differed by subtype, these associations could be cautiously used in prognostication models to inform patient-centered care.

A prospective investigation of oral contraceptive use and breast cancer mortality: findings from the Swedish women's lifestyle and health cohort

BACKGROUND

The association between oral contraceptive (OC) use and long-term mortality remains uncertain and previous studies have reported conflicting findings. We aim to assess the long-term impact of OC use on all-cause and cancer-specific mortality.

METHODS

Out of 49,259 participants, we analysed data on 2120 (4.3%) women diagnosed with first primary breast cancer between 1993 and 2012, in the Swedish Women's Lifestyle and Health Study. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to graph the hazard of mortality in association with oral contraceptives use, stage of disease and hormone receptors status at diagnosis. Cox proportional hazard model were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) between OC use and all-cause mortality. The same association was studied for breast cancer-specific mortality by modelling the log cumulative mortality risk, adjusting for clinical stage at diagnosis, hormone receptor status, body mass index and smoking.

RESULTS

Among 2120 women with breast cancer, 1268 (84%) reported ever use of OC and 254 died within 10 years of diagnosis. The risk of death for OC ever-users relative to never-users was: HR = 1.13 (95% CI: 0.66-1.94) for all-cause mortality and HR = 1.29 (95% CI: 0.53-3.18) for breast cancer-specific mortality. A high percentage of women (42.9%) were diagnosed at early stage disease (stage I).

CONCLUSIONS

Among women with primary breast cancer, OC ever-users compared to never- users did not have a higher all-cause or breast cancer specific-mortality, after the adjustment of risk factors.

The Impact of Hormonal Contraceptives on Breast Cancer Pathology

This retrospective case series study, using data obtained through questionnaires and histopathological diagnoses from 656 patients enrolled in the Department of Defense (DoD) Clinical Breast Care Project (CBCP), evaluated associations between hormonal contraceptive use and breast cancer pathology including benign breast pathologies. Three combination hormonal contraceptive agents (COCs) Lo Ovral (LO), Ortho Novum (ON), and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (OTC) were evaluated as they represented the most commonly used hormonal contraceptives in our cohort. The results of this study suggest that the ever use of LO + ON + OTC does not influence the overall incidence of benign breast condition or malignant disease compared to other COCs; however, patients that have used OTC had an association with a diagnosis of benign or luminal A pathologies whereas ON was associated with a diagnosis of benign and DCIS; LO showed no association with any diagnosis-benign or malignant. Patients that have used LO or ON were more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≥ 40 years whereas patients that had ever used OTC were likely to be diagnosed before the age of 40. Caucasians were less likely to have used OTC and more likely to have used ON; however, use of either hormonal agent positively correlated with premenopausal status at diagnosis and having a benign condition. Age at diagnosis, ethnicity, BMI, family history, menstruation status, and duration of use were all independent predictors of different histopathological subtypes. We conclude that patient-specific variables should be considered when deciding on which type of hormonal contraceptive to use to minimize the risk of developing breast cancer or a breast-related pathology.

Do Breast Cancer Risk Factors Affect the Survival of Breast Cancer Patients in Southern Sri Lanka?

Background:

Breast cancer continues to be a major cause of morbidity among women in Sri Lanka. Possible effects of etiological risk factors on breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) of the disease is not clear. This study was designed to explore the impact of breast cancer risk factors on the BCSS of patients in Southern Sri Lanka.

Method:

This retro-prospective study included all breast cancer patients who had sought immunohistochemistry services at our unit from May 2006 to December 2012. A pre-tested, interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to gather information on risk factors. BCSS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier model. Univariate Cox-regression analysis was performed with 95% confidence intervals using the SPSS statistical package.

Results:

A total of 944 breast cancer patients were included. Five year BCSS was 78.8%. There was a statistically significant difference between the patients who had a family history of breast cancer and no family history of any cancer in terms of the presence/absence of lymph node metastasis (p=0.011) and pathological stage (p=0.042). The majority of the premenopausal patients had associated DCIS (p<0.001) and large tumours (p=0.015) with positive lymph nodes (p=0.016). There was no statistically significant association between hormone receptor subtypes and hormone related risk factors. Univariate analysis revealed that breast cancer risk factors had no significant effect on the BCSS.

Conclusion:

Even though family history of breast cancer and premenopausal status are associated with poor prognostic features, they, in line with the other breast cancer risk factors, appear to have no significant effect on the BCSS of patients in Southern Sri Lanka.

Estrogen augmentation in schizophrenia: a quantitative review of current evidence

BACKGROUND

Sex differences in the incidence, onset and course of schizophrenia have led to the hypothesis that estrogens play a protective role in the pathophysiology of this disorder. Several trials have assessed the potential of estrogens in reducing schizophrenia symptoms, showing inconsistent results. This quantitative review summarizes available evidence on the efficacy of estrogens in the treatment of schizophrenia.

METHODS

Only double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized studies were included. Primary outcome measure was total symptom severity, secondary outcome measures were subscores for positive and negative symptoms. Effect sizes were calculated for individual studies and, if possible, pooled in meta-analyses to obtain combined, weighted effect sizes (Hedges's g).

RESULTS

Superior efficacy was found for estrogen treatment in female patients (four RCTs, 214 patients) on total symptom severity (Hedges's g=0.66), although heterogeneity was moderate to high. Estrogens were also superior in reducing positive (Hedges's g=0.54) and negative symptoms (Hedges's g=0.34), with low heterogeneity. As the included studies applied different forms of estrogens, a separate analysis was conducted on the trials applying estradiol (three RCTs, 170 patients). Even larger effect sizes were found for total symptom severity (Hedges's g=0.79), positive (Hedges's g=0.57) and negative symptoms (Hedges's g=0.45), with reduced heterogeneity. Estrogen treatment in male patients (one study, 53 patients) was not superior to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that estrogens, especially estradiol, could be an effective augmentation strategy in the treatment of women with schizophrenia. However, future larger trials are needed before recommendations on clinical applications can be made.