1
|
Letendre A, Shewchuk B, Healy BA, Chiang B, Bill L, Newsome J, Rahul CR, Yang H, Kopciuk KA. Assessing Breast Cancer Screening and Outcomes Among First Nations Women in Alberta. Cancer Control 2024; 31:10732748241230763. [PMID: 38299564 PMCID: PMC10836128 DOI: 10.1177/10732748241230763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) incidence rates for First Nations (FN) women in Canada have been steadily increasing and are often diagnosed at a later stage. Despite efforts to expand the reach of BC screening programs for FN populations in Alberta (AB), gaps in screening and outcomes exist. METHODS Existing population-based administrative databases including the AB BC Screening Program, the AB Cancer Registry, and an AB-specific FN registry data were linked to evaluate BC screening participation, detection, and timeliness of outcomes in this retrospective study. Tests of proportions and trends compared the findings between FN and non-FN women, aged 50-74 years, beginning in 2008. Incorporation of FN principles of ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP®) managed respectful sharing and utilization of FN data and findings. RESULTS The average age-standardized participation (2013-8) and retention rates (2015-6) for FN women compared to non-FN women in AB were 23.8% (P < .0001) and 10.3% (P = .059) lower per year, respectively. FN women were diagnosed with an invasive cancer more often in Stage II (P-value = .02). Following 90% completion of diagnostic assessments, it took 2-4 weeks longer for FN women to receive their first diagnosis as well as definitive diagnoses than non-FN women. CONCLUSION Collectively, these findings suggest that access to and provision of screening services for FN women may not be equitable and may contribute to higher BC incidence and mortality rates. Collaborations between FN groups and screening programs are needed to eliminate these inequities to prevent more cancers in FN women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angeline Letendre
- Public Health Evidence & Innovation, Provincial, Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Brittany Shewchuk
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Bonnie A Healy
- Siksikaitsitapi - Blackfoot Confederacy Tribal Council, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Bonnie Chiang
- Screening Programs, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Lea Bill
- Alberta First Nations Information Governance Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - James Newsome
- Screening Programs, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Chinmoy Roy Rahul
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Huiming Yang
- Screening Programs, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Karen A Kopciuk
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Banham D, Roder D, Thompson S, Williamson A, Bray F, Currow D. The effect of general practice contact on cancer stage at diagnosis in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal residents of New South Wales. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:909-926. [PMID: 37329444 PMCID: PMC10460337 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01727-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Older age, risks from pre-existing health conditions and socio-economic disadvantage are negatively related to the prospects of an early-stage cancer diagnosis. With older Aboriginal Australians having an elevated prevalence of these underlying factors, this study examines the potential for the mitigating effects of more frequent contact with general practitioners (GPs) in ensuring local-stage at diagnosis. METHODS We compared the odds of local vs. more advanced stage at diagnosis of solid tumours according to GP contact, using linked registry and administrative data. Results were compared between Aboriginal (n = 4,084) and non-Aboriginal (n = 249,037) people aged 50 + years in New South Wales with a first diagnosis of cancer in 2003-2016. RESULTS Younger age, male sex, having less area-based socio-economic disadvantage, and fewer comorbid conditions in the 12 months before diagnosis (0-2 vs. 3 +), were associated with local-stage in fully-adjusted structural models. The odds of local-stage with more frequent GP contact (14 + contacts per annum) also differed by Aboriginal status, with a higher adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of local-stage for frequent GP contact among Aboriginal people (aOR = 1.29; 95% CI 1.11-1.49) but not among non-Aboriginal people (aOR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.95-0.99). CONCLUSION Older Aboriginal Australians diagnosed with cancer experience more comorbid conditions and more socioeconomic disadvantage than other Australians, which are negatively related to diagnosis at a local-cancer stage. More frequent GP contact may act to partly offset this among the Aboriginal population of NSW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Banham
- Cancer Statistics and Information Division, Cancer Institute of New South Wales, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - David Roder
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sandra Thompson
- WA Centre for Rural Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Freddie Bray
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research On Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - David Currow
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Banham D, Karnon J, Brown A, Roder D, Lynch J. The fraction of life years lost after diagnosis (FLYLAD): a person-centred measure of cancer burden. Popul Health Metr 2023; 21:14. [PMID: 37704992 PMCID: PMC10500871 DOI: 10.1186/s12963-023-00314-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer control initiatives are informed by quantifying the capacity to reduce cancer burden through effective interventions. Burden measures using health administrative data are a sustainable way to support monitoring and evaluating of outcomes among patients and populations. The Fraction of Life Years Lost After Diagnosis (FLYLAD) is one such burden measure. We use data on Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal South Australians from 1990 to 2010 to show how FLYLAD quantifies disparities in cancer burden: between populations; between sub-population cohorts where stage at diagnosis is available; and when follow-up is constrained to 24-months after diagnosis. METHOD FLYLADcancer is the fraction of years of life expectancy lost due to cancer (YLLcancer) to life expectancy years at risk at time of cancer diagnosis (LYAR) for each person. The Global Burden of Disease standard life table provides referent life expectancies. FLYLADcancer was estimated for the population of cancer cases diagnosed in South Australia from 1990 to 2010. Cancer stage at diagnosis was also available for cancers diagnosed in Aboriginal people and a cohort of non-Aboriginal people matched by sex, year of birth, primary cancer site and year of diagnosis. RESULTS Cancers diagnoses (N = 144,891) included 777 among Aboriginal people. Cancer burden described by FLYLADcancer was higher among Aboriginal than non-Aboriginal (0.55, 95% CIs 0.52-0.59 versus 0.39, 95% CIs 0.39-0.40). Diagnoses at younger ages among Aboriginal people, 7 year higher LYAR (31.0, 95% CIs 30.0-32.0 versus 24.1, 95% CIs 24.1-24.2) and higher premature cancer mortality (YLLcancer = 16.3, 95% CIs 15.1-17.5 versus YLLcancer = 8.2, 95% CIs 8.2-8.3) influenced this. Disparities in cancer burden between the matched Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal cohorts manifested 24-months after diagnosis with FLYLADcancer 0.44, 95% CIs 0.40-0.47 and 0.28, 95% CIs 0.25-0.31 respectively. CONCLUSION FLYLAD described disproportionately higher cancer burden among Aboriginal people in comparisons involving: all people diagnosed with cancer; the matched cohorts; and, within groups diagnosed with same staged disease. The extent of disparities were evident 24-months after diagnosis. This is evidence of Aboriginal peoples' substantial capacity to benefit from cancer control initiatives, particularly those leading to earlier detection and treatment of cancers. FLYLAD's use of readily available, person-level administrative records can help evaluate health care initiatives addressing this need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Banham
- School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
- Wardliparingga Aboriginal Health Research, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Alex Brown
- Wardliparingga Aboriginal Health Research, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - David Roder
- School of Health Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - John Lynch
- School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chan J, Griffiths K, Turner A, Tobias J, Clarmont W, Delaney G, Hutton J, Olson R, Penniment M, Bourque JM, Brundage M, Rodin D, Slotman B, Yap ML. Radiation Therapy and Indigenous Peoples in Canada and Australia: Building Paths Toward Reconciliation in Cancer Care Delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:421-429. [PMID: 36990919 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Indigenous peoples represent approximately 5% of the world's population and reside in over 90 countries worldwide. They embody a rich diversity of cultures, traditions, languages and relationships with the land that are shared through many generations and that are distinct from those of the settler societies within which they now live. Many Indigenous peoples have a shared experience of discrimination, trauma, and violation of rights, rooted in complex sociopolitical relationships with settler societies that are still ongoing. This results in continuing social injustices and pronounced disparities in health for many Indigenous peoples around the globe. Indigenous peoples exhibit a significantly higher cancer incidence, mortality, and poorer survival compared to non-Indigenous peoples. Cancer services, including radiotherapy, have not been designed to support the specific values and needs of Indigenous populations, resulting in poorer access to cancer services for Indigenous peoples globally across the entire cancer care spectrum. Specific to radiotherapy, available evidence demonstrates disparities in radiotherapy uptake between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients. Radiotherapy centres are also located disparately further away from Indigenous communities. Studies are limited by a lack of Indigenous-specific data to help inform effective radiotherapy delivery. Recent Indigenous-led partnerships and initiatives have helped to address existing gaps in cancer care, and radiation oncologists play an important role in supporting such efforts. In this article, we present an overview of access to radiotherapy for Indigenous peoples in Canada and Australia, with a focus on strengthening cancer care delivery through education, partnerships, and research.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cole KM, Hutton B, Hamel C, Bourque JM, Arnaout A, Clemons M. Breast cancer in Indigenous women living in Canada: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2021; 19:3412-3422. [PMID: 34171894 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-20-00522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to describe and synthesize the current state of knowledge pertaining to breast cancer in Indigenous women living in Canada. We will examine the continuum of breast cancer care in this population, including breast cancer screening, diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance. INTRODUCTION Breast cancer in Indigenous women is an evolving health care concern in Canada, with mounting evidence suggesting that these women present at later stages, and have poorer survival rates compared with the general population. A comprehensive overview of the state of knowledge of breast cancer in this population is required. INCLUSION CRITERIA The population of interest will include Indigenous women living in Canada aged 18 years or older who have been screened or require screening for breast cancer, or who have been diagnosed with breast cancer. "Indigenous" will include women who identify as First Nations, Métis, or Inuit. Eligible sources must report on breast cancer risk factors, tumor characteristics, health systems access, screening, diagnosis, treatment, surveillance, or breast cancer outcomes. We will include analytic studies, surveys, case series, reviews, meta-analyses, and gray literature. METHODS We will conduct a search of five health sciences databases for relevant studies published in English or French from database inception onward. We will utilize dual independent screening for titles, abstracts, and full-text articles, and will utilize a similar method for gray literature sources. Data will be synthesized using a narrative approach, and outcomes of interest will be compared with data from the general breast cancer population. REGISTRATION Open Science Framework https://osf.io/xkde5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Marie Cole
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Candyce Hamel
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jean-Marc Bourque
- Department of Radiology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Angel Arnaout
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Survey, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Clemons
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Enuaraq S, Gifford W, Ashton S, Al Awar Z, Larocque C, Rolfe D. Understanding culturally safe cancer survivorship care with inuit in an urban community. Int J Circumpolar Health 2021; 80:1949843. [PMID: 34219604 PMCID: PMC8259824 DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2021.1949843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a leading cause of death among Inuit. A legacy of colonialism, residential schools, and systemic racism has eroded trust among Inuit and many do not receive culturally safe care. This study aimed to explore the meaning of culturally safe cancer survivorship care for Inuit, and barriers and facilitators to receiving it in an urban setting in Ontario Canada. As Inuit and Western researchers, we conducted a descriptive qualitative study. We held two focus groups (n = 27) with cancer survivors and family members, and semi-structured interviews (n = 7) with health providers. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis.Three broad themes emerged as central to culturally safe care: access to traditional ways of life, communication, and family involvement. Family support, patient navigators, and designated spaces were facilitators; lack of support for traditional ways, like country food, was a barrier. Participants were clear what constituted culturally safe care, but major barriers exist. Lack of direction at institutional and governmental levels contributes to the complexity of issues that prevent Inuit from engaging in and receiving culturally safe cancer care. To understand how to transform healthcare to be culturally safe, studies underpinned by Inuit epistemology, values, and principles are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wendy Gifford
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Zeina Al Awar
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ayeni OA, Norris SA, Joffe M, Cubasch H, Nietz S, Buccimazza I, Singh U, Čačala S, Stopforth L, Chen WC, McCormack VA, O’Neil DS, Jacobson JS, Neugut AI, Ruff P, Micklesfield LK. The multimorbidity profile of South African women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2020; 147:361-374. [PMID: 31600408 PMCID: PMC7649092 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Multimorbidity in women with breast cancer may delay presentation, affect treatment decisions and outcomes. We described the multimorbidity profile of women with breast cancer, its determinants, associations with stage at diagnosis and treatments received. We collected self-reported data on five chronic conditions (hypertension, diabetes, cerebrovascular diseases, asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tuberculosis), determined obesity using body mass index (BMI) and tested HIV status, in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2016 and April 2018 in five public hospitals in South Africa. We identified determinants of ≥2 of the seven above-mentioned conditions (defined as multimorbidity), multimorbidity itself with stage at diagnosis (advanced [III-IV] vs. early [0-II]) and multimorbidity with treatment modalities received. Among 2,281 women, 1,001 (44%) presented with multimorbidity. Obesity (52.8%), hypertension (41.3%), HIV (22.0%) and diabetes (13.7%) were the chronic conditions that occurred most frequently. Multimorbidity was more common with older age (OR = 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.03) and higher household socioeconomic status (HSES) (OR = 1.06; 95% CI 1.00-1.13). Multimorbidity was not associated with advanced-stage breast cancer at diagnosis, but for self-reported hypertension there was less likelihood of being diagnosed with advanced-stage disease in the adjusted model (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.64-0.98). Multimorbidity was associated with first treatment received in those with early-stage disease, p = 0.003. The prevalence of multimorbidity is high among patients with breast cancer. Our findings suggest that multimorbidity had a significant impact on treatment received in those with early-stage disease. There is need to understand the impact of multimorbidity on breast cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluwatosin A. Ayeni
- Non communicable Diseases Research Division, Wits Health Consortium (PTY) Ltd, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
- SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Shane A. Norris
- Non communicable Diseases Research Division, Wits Health Consortium (PTY) Ltd, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
- SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Maureen Joffe
- Non communicable Diseases Research Division, Wits Health Consortium (PTY) Ltd, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
- SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
- South Africa Medical Research Council Common Epithelial Cancers Research Centre, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Herbert Cubasch
- Non communicable Diseases Research Division, Wits Health Consortium (PTY) Ltd, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
- South Africa Medical Research Council Common Epithelial Cancers Research Centre, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
- Department of Surgery, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Sarah Nietz
- Non communicable Diseases Research Division, Wits Health Consortium (PTY) Ltd, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
- Department of Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Ines Buccimazza
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban and Ngwelezane Hospital, University of KwaZulu Natal, Empangeni, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa
| | - Urishka Singh
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban and Ngwelezane Hospital, University of KwaZulu Natal, Empangeni, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa
| | - Sharon Čačala
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, Grey’s Hospital, University of KwaZulu Natal, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa
| | - Laura Stopforth
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, Grey’s Hospital, University of KwaZulu Natal, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa
| | - Wenlong Carl Chen
- National Cancer Registry, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Valerie A. McCormack
- Section for Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Daniel S. O’Neil
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Miami, United States
| | - Judith S. Jacobson
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York NY, United States
| | - Alfred I. Neugut
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York NY, United States
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York NY, United States
- Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York NY, United States
| | - Paul Ruff
- Non communicable Diseases Research Division, Wits Health Consortium (PTY) Ltd, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
- South Africa Medical Research Council Common Epithelial Cancers Research Centre, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Lisa K. Micklesfield
- Non communicable Diseases Research Division, Wits Health Consortium (PTY) Ltd, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
- SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sheppard AJ, Chiarelli AM, Hanley AJ, Marrett LD. Influence of Preexisting Diabetes on Survival After a Breast Cancer Diagnosis in First Nations Women in Ontario, Canada. JCO Glob Oncol 2020; 6:99-107. [PMID: 32031452 PMCID: PMC6998021 DOI: 10.1200/jgo.19.00061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Survival after a breast cancer diagnosis is poorer in First Nations women with a preexisting comorbidity compared with comorbidity-free First Nations women in Ontario, Canada. Given the high prevalence of diabetes in this population, it is important to determine whether preexisting diabetes is related to poorer survival after a breast cancer diagnosis. METHODS All First Nations women were identified from a cohort of First Nations people diagnosed with breast cancer in diagnostic periods-1995 to 1999 and 2000 to 2004-and seen at a regional cancer program (RCP) in Ontario. Preexisting diabetes status and other factors, such as age at diagnosis, body mass index, and stage at diagnosis, were collected from medical charts at the regional cancer programs. The association between preexisting diabetes and First Nations status was examined by each of the demographic, personal, tumor, and treatment factors using logistic regression models. Survival was compared between First Nations women with (n = 67) and without (n = 215) preexisting diabetes, adjusted by significant study factors using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS The 5-year survival rate among First Nations women with diabetes was 59.8% versus 78.7% among those without diabetes (P < .01). Preexisting diabetes significantly increased the risk of death among First Nations women with breast cancer (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.13) after adjustment for age group, period of diagnosis, body mass index, other comorbidities at diagnosis, and stage. CONCLUSION This study recommends awareness of this survival discrepancy among the treatment team for First Nations patients with breast cancer with preexisting diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J. Sheppard
- Indigenous Cancer Care Unit, Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna M. Chiarelli
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Cancer Screening, Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony J.G. Hanley
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Loraine D. Marrett
- Indigenous Cancer Care Unit, Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
In search of Pan-American indigenous health and harmony. Global Health 2019; 15:16. [PMID: 30786901 PMCID: PMC6381669 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-019-0454-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this article is to describe the state of North, Central, South American and Caribbean (Pan-American) indigenous health. The second objective is to identify recommendations for optimal healthcare and research strategies to achieve indigenous health equity. Current health disparities continue to present between indigenous populations and general populations. Research foci of Pan-American indigenous health center on health outcomes for chronic and acute disease as well as presence of indigenous in data sets. Research is both qualitative and quantitative. Recommendations to improve indigenous health in effort of health equity are variable yet feasible. Stronger epidemiology, continued cohesive Pan-American global strategies, better research alignment with emphasis to quality and comprehensive metric analyses in healthcare delivery are all avenues to improve the health of the indigenous. Research and healthcare delivery on the Pan-American indigenous must be maximized for optimal results, must be representative of the indigenous communities, must be implemented in best practice and must introduce sustainable healthcare delivery for Pan-American indigenous health equity.
Collapse
|
10
|
Validity of Administrative Databases in Comparison to Medical Charts for Breast Cancer Treatment Data. J Cancer Epidemiol 2018; 2018:9218595. [PMID: 29861727 PMCID: PMC5976924 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9218595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Medical chart abstraction is the gold standard for collecting breast cancer treatment data for monitoring and research. A less costly alternative is the use of administrative databases. This study will evaluate administrative data in comparison to medical charts for breast cancer treatment information. Study Design and Setting A retrospective cohort design identified 2,401 women in the Ontario Breast Screening Program diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2006 to 2009. Treatment data were obtained from the Activity Level Reporting and Canadian Institute of Health Information databases. Medical charts were abstracted at cancer centres. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and kappa were calculated for receipt and type of treatment, and agreement was assessed for dates. Logistic regression evaluated factors influencing agreement. Results Sensitivity and specificity for receipt of radiotherapy (92.0%, 99.3%), chemotherapy (77.7%, 99.2%), and surgery (95.8%, 100%) were high but decreased slightly for specific radiotherapy anatomic locations, chemotherapy protocols, and surgeries. Agreement increased by radiotherapy year (trend test, p < 0.0001). Stage II/III compared to stage I cancer decreased odds of agreement for chemotherapy (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48–0.91) and increased agreement for partial mastectomy (OR = 3.36, 95% CI: 2.27–4.99). Exact agreement in treatment dates varied from 83.0% to 96.5%. Conclusion Administrative data can be accurately utilized for future breast cancer treatment studies.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kimmick GG, Li X, Fleming ST, Sabatino SA, Wilson JF, Lipscomb J, Cress R, Bergom C, Anderson RT, Wu XC. Risk of cancer death by comorbidity severity and use of adjuvant chemotherapy among women with locoregional breast cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 9:214-220. [PMID: 29174187 PMCID: PMC11119002 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Revised: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the associations of comorbidity and chemotherapy with breast cancer- and non-breast cancer-related death. MATERIALS AND METHODS Included were women with invasive locoregional breast cancer diagnosed in 2004 from seven population-based cancer registries. Data were abstracted from medical records and verified with treating physicians when there were inconsistencies and missing information on cancer treatment. Comorbidity severity was quantified using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27. Treatment guideline concordance was determined by comparing treatment received with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions were employed for statistical analyses. RESULTS Of 5852 patients, 76% were under 70years old and 69% received guideline concordant adjuvant chemotherapy. Comorbidity was more prevalent in women age 70 and older (79% vs. 51%; p<0.001). After adjusting for tumor characteristics and treatment, severe comorbidity burden was associated with significantly higher cancer-related mortality in older patients (Hazard Ratio [HR]=2.38, 95% CI 1.08-5.24), but not in younger patients (HR=1.78, 95% CI 0.87-3.64). Among patients receiving guideline adjuvant chemotherapy, cancer-related mortality was significantly higher in older patients (HR=2.35, 95% CI 1.52-3.62), and those with severe comorbidity (HR=3.79, 95% CI 1.72-8.33). CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that, compared to women with no comorbidity, patients with breast cancer age 70 and older with severe comorbidity are at increased risk of dying from breast cancer, even after adjustment for adjuvant chemotherapy and other tumor and treatment differences. This information adds to risk-benefit discussions and emphasizes the need for further study of the role for adjuvant chemotherapy in these patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen G Kimmick
- Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3204, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Xiangrong Li
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 2020 Gravier Street, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Steven T Fleming
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, 1111 Washington Avenue, Lexington, KY 40536-0003, USA
| | - Susan A Sabatino
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway MS K76, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| | - J Frank Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, n8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Joseph Lipscomb
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Rm 720, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Rosemary Cress
- Department of Public Health Sciences, UCDavis School of Medicine, Public Health Institute, Cancer Registry of Greater California, 1825 Bell St., Suite 102, Sacramento, CA 95825, USA
| | - Carmen Bergom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, n8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Roger T Anderson
- Division of Health Services Research, Penn State College of Medicine, The UVA Cancer Center, PO Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0793, USA
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 2020 Gravier Street, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mazereeuw MV, Yurkiewich A, Jamal S, Cawley C, Jones CR, Marrett LD. Cancer risk factors and screening in First Nations in Ontario. HEALTH PROMOTION AND CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION IN CANADA-RESEARCH POLICY AND PRACTICE 2018; 37:186-193. [PMID: 28614046 DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.37.6.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A lack of identifiers in health administrative databases limits our understanding of the cancer burden in First Nations. This study compares cancer risk factors and screening between First Nations in Ontario (on and off reserve) and non-Aboriginal Ontarians using two unique health surveys. METHODS We measured age-standardized prevalence estimates using the First Nations Regional Health Survey (RHS) Phase 2, 2008/10 (for First Nations on reserve) and the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS), 2007-2013 (for First Nations off reserve and non-Aboriginal Ontarians). We used prevalence rate ratios (RR) and Pearson's chisquare tests for differences in proportions to compare estimates between First Nations (on and off reserve) and non-Aboriginal Ontarians. RESULTS A higher proportion of First Nation men, women and adolescents on reserve smoked (RR = 1.97, 2.78 and 7.21 respectively) and were obese (RR = 1.73, 2.33 and 3.29 respectively) compared to their non-Aboriginal counterparts. Similar patterns were observed for First Nations off reserve. Frequent binge drinking was also more prevalent among First Nation men and women living on reserve (RR = 1.28 and 2.22, respectively) and off reserve (RR = 1.70 and 1.45, respectively) than non-Aboriginal Ontarians. First Nation men and women on reserve were about half as likely to consume fruit at least twice per day and vegetables at least twice per day compared to non-Aboriginal men and women (RR = 0.53 and 0.54, respectively). Pap test uptake was similar across all groups, while First Nation women on reserve were less likely to have had a mammogram in the last five years than non-Aboriginal women (RR = 0.85). CONCLUSION First Nations, especially those living on reserve, have an increased risk for cancer and other chronic diseases compared to non-Aboriginal Ontarians. These results provide evidence to support policies and programs to reduce the future burden of cancer and other chronic diseases in First Nations in Ontario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maegan V Mazereeuw
- Aboriginal Cancer Control Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Sehar Jamal
- Aboriginal Cancer Control Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caroline Cawley
- Aboriginal Cancer Control Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carmen R Jones
- Health Sector, Chiefs of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Loraine D Marrett
- Aboriginal Cancer Control Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Banham D, Roder D, Brown A. Comorbidities contribute to the risk of cancer death among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal South Australians: Analysis of a matched cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol 2018; 52:75-82. [PMID: 29272753 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Revised: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aboriginal Australians have poorer cancer survival than other Australians. Diagnoses at later stages and correlates of remote area living influence, but do not fully explain, these disparities. Little is known of the prevalence and influence of comorbid conditions experienced by Aboriginal people, including their effect on cancer survival. This study quantifies hospital recorded comorbidities using the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), examines their influence on risk of cancer death, then considers effect variation by Aboriginality. METHODS Cancers diagnosed among Aboriginal South Australians in 1990-2010 (N = 777) were matched with randomly selected non-Aboriginal cases by birth year, diagnostic year, sex, and primary site, then linked to administrative hospital records to the time of diagnosis. Competing risk regression summarised associations of Aboriginal status, stage, geographic attributes and comorbidities with risk of cancer death. RESULTS A threshold of four or more ECI conditions was associated with increased risk of cancer death (sub-hazard ratio SHR 1.66, 95%CI 1.11-2.46). Alternatively, the presence of any one of a subset of ECI conditions was associated with similarly increased risk (SHR = 1.62, 95%CI 1.23-2.14). The observed effects did not differ between Aboriginal and matched non-Aboriginal cases. However, Aboriginal cases experienced three times higher exposure than non-Aboriginal to four or more ECI conditions (14.2% versus 4.5%) and greater exposure to the subset of ECI conditions (20.7% versus 8.0%). CONCLUSION Comorbidities at diagnosis increased the risk of cancer death in addition to risks associated with Aboriginality, remoteness of residence and disease stage at diagnosis. The Aboriginal cohort experienced comparatively greater exposure to comorbidities which adds to disparities in cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Banham
- Wardliparingga Aboriginal Research Unit, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia; Centre for Population Health Research, School of Health Sciences, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
| | - David Roder
- Centre for Population Health Research, School of Health Sciences, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Alex Brown
- Wardliparingga Aboriginal Research Unit, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia; Aboriginal Health Research Group, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dasgupta P, Baade PD, Youlden DR, Garvey G, Aitken JF, Wallington I, Chynoweth J, Zorbas H, Roder D, Youl PH. Variations in outcomes for Indigenous women with breast cancer in Australia: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2017; 26:e12662. [PMID: 28186346 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/24/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
This systematic review examines variations in outcomes along the breast cancer continuum for Australian women by Indigenous status. Multiple databases were systematically searched for peer-reviewed articles published from 1 January 1990 to 1 March 2015 focussing on adult female breast cancer patients in Australia and assessing survival, patient and tumour characteristics, diagnosis and treatment by Indigenous status. Sixteen quantitative studies were included with 12 rated high, 3 moderate and 1 as low quality. No eligible studies on referral, treatment choices, completion or follow-up were retrieved. Indigenous women had poorer survival most likely reflecting geographical isolation, advanced disease, patterns of care, comorbidities and disadvantage. They were also more likely to be diagnosed when younger, have advanced disease or comorbidities, reside in disadvantaged or remote areas, and less likely to undergo mammographic screening or surgery. Despite wide heterogeneity across studies, an overall pattern of poorer survival for Indigenous women and variations along the breast cancer continuum of care was evident. The predominance of state-specific studies and small numbers of included Indigenous women made forming a national perspective difficult. The review highlighted the need to improve Indigenous identification in cancer registries and administrative databases and identified key gaps notably the lack of qualitative studies in current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Dasgupta
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - P D Baade
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - D R Youlden
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - G Garvey
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - J F Aitken
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
- School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia
| | - I Wallington
- Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - J Chynoweth
- Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - H Zorbas
- Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - D Roder
- Centre for Population Health Research, Samson Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - P H Youl
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Withrow DR, Pole JD, Nishri ED, Tjepkema M, Marrett LD. Cancer Survival Disparities Between First Nation and Non-Aboriginal Adults in Canada: Follow-up of the 1991 Census Mortality Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016; 26:145-151. [DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2016] [Accepted: 10/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
16
|
Abstract
Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Comorbidity is common among cancer patients and, with an aging population, is becoming more so. Comorbidity potentially affects the development, stage at diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of people with cancer. Despite the intimate relationship between comorbidity and cancer, there is limited consensus on how to record, interpret, or manage comorbidity in the context of cancer, with the result that patients who have comorbidity are less likely to receive treatment with curative intent. Evidence in this area is lacking because of the frequent exclusion of patients with comorbidity from randomized controlled trials. There is evidence that some patients with comorbidity have potentially curative treatment unnecessarily modified, compromising optimal care. Patients with comorbidity have poorer survival, poorer quality of life, and higher health care costs. Strategies to address these issues include improving the evidence base for patients with comorbidity, further development of clinical tools to assist decision making, improved integration and coordination of care, and skill development for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:337-350. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Sarfati
- Director, Cancer Control and Screening Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Bogda Koczwara
- Senior Staff Specialist, Flinders Center for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher Jackson
- Senior Lecturer in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
- Consultant Medical Oncologist, Southern District Health Board, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Withrow DR, Racey CS, Jamal S. A critical review of methods for assessing cancer survival disparities in indigenous population. Ann Epidemiol 2016; 26:579-591. [PMID: 27431064 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2016] [Revised: 05/27/2016] [Accepted: 06/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE An increasing cancer burden among indigenous populations has led to a growing literature about survival disparities between indigenous and nonindigenous persons. We aim to describe and appraise methods used to measure cancer survival in indigenous persons in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. METHODS We searched Medline, Web of Science, and EMBASE for articles published between 1990 and 2015 that estimated survival in populations indigenous to one of these four countries. We gathered information about data sources, analytical methods, and the extent to which threats to validity were discussed. RESULTS The search retrieved 83 articles. The most common approach to survival analysis was cause-specific survival (n = 49). Thirty-eight articles measured all-cause survival and 11 measured excess mortality attributable to cancer (relative survival). Three sources of information bias common to all studies (ethnic misclassification, incomplete case ascertainment, and incomplete death ascertainment) were acknowledged in a minority of articles. CONCLUSIONS The methodological considerations we present here are shared with studies of cancer survival across other subpopulations. We urge future researchers on this and related topics to clearly describe their data sources, to justify analytic choices, and to fully discuss the potential impact of those choices on the results and interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana R Withrow
- Aboriginal Cancer Control Unit, Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - C Sarai Racey
- Department of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sehar Jamal
- Aboriginal Cancer Control Unit, Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moore SP, Soerjomataram I, Green AC, Garvey G, Martin J, Valery PC. Breast cancer diagnosis, patterns of care and burden of disease in Queensland, Australia (1998-2004): does being Indigenous make a difference? Int J Public Health 2016; 61:435-42. [PMID: 26427859 DOI: 10.1007/s00038-015-0739-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2014] [Revised: 09/01/2015] [Accepted: 09/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We compared patterns of care, comorbidity, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) and survival in Indigenous and non-Indigenous women with breast cancer in Queensland, Australia (1998-2004). METHODS A cohort study of Indigenous (n = 110) and non-Indigenous women (n = 105), frequency matched on age and remoteness. We used Pearson's Chi-squared analysis to compare proportions, hazard models to assess survival differences and calculated disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). RESULTS Indigenous women were more likely to be socially disadvantaged (43 vs. 20 %, p < 0.01) have comorbidity (42 vs. 18 % p < 0.01), and have regional spread or distant metastasis (metastasis, 51 vs. 36 %, p = 0.02) than non-Indigenous women; there was no difference in treatment patterns. More Indigenous women died in the follow-up period (p = 0.01). DALY's were 469 and 665 per 100,000 for Indigenous and non-Indigenous women, respectively, with a larger proportion of the burden attributed to premature death among the former (63 vs. 59 %). CONCLUSIONS Indigenous women with breast cancer received comparable treatment to their non-Indigenous counterparts. The higher proportion of DALYs related to early death in Indigenous women suggests higher fatality with breast cancer in this group. Later stage at diagnosis and higher comorbidity presence among Indigenous women reinforce the need for early detection and improved management of co-existing disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne P Moore
- Division of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Level 1/147 Wharf Street, Brisbane Adelaide Street, Spring Hill, PO Box 10639, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
| | - Isabelle Soerjomataram
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Adèle C Green
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer of Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- CRUK Manchester Institute and University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Gail Garvey
- Division of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Level 1/147 Wharf Street, Brisbane Adelaide Street, Spring Hill, PO Box 10639, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
| | - Jennifer Martin
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland and Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Patricia C Valery
- Division of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Level 1/147 Wharf Street, Brisbane Adelaide Street, Spring Hill, PO Box 10639, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer of Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sarfati D, Robson B. Equitable cancer control: better data needed for indigenous people. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16:1442-1444. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00295-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2015] [Accepted: 08/27/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
20
|
Bao PP, Zhao ZG, Gao YT, Zheng Y, Zhang B, Cai H, Zheng W, Shu XO, Lu W. Association of type 2 diabetes genetic variants with breast cancer survival among Chinese women. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0117419. [PMID: 25679392 PMCID: PMC4332504 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2014] [Accepted: 12/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate whether the genetic susceptibility of T2D was associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes for breast cancer (BC). Methods Included in the study were 6346 BC patients who participated in three population-based epidemiological studies of BC and were genotyped with either GWAS or Exome-chip. We constructed a genetic risk score (GRS) for diabetes using risk variants identified from the GWAS catalog (http://genome.gov/gwastudies) that were associated with T2D risk at a minimum significance level of P ≤ 5.0E-8 among Asian population and evaluated its associations with BC outcomes with Cox proportional hazards models. Results During a median follow-up of 8.08 years (range, 0.01–16.95 years), 1208 deaths were documented in 6346 BC patients. Overall, the diabetes GRS was not associated with OS and DFS. Analyses stratified by estrogen receptor status (ER) showed that the diabetes GRS was inversely associated with OS among women with ER- but not in women with ER+ breast cancer; the multivariable adjusted HR was 1.38 (95% CI: 1.05–1.82) when comparing the highest to the lowest GRS quartiles. The association of diabetes GRS with OS varied by diabetes status (P for interaction <0.01). In women with history of diabetes, higher diabetes GRS was significantly associated with worse OS, with HR of 2.22 (95% CI: 1.28–3.88) for the highest vs. lowest quartile, particularly among women with an ER- breast cancer, with corresponding HR being 4.59 (95% CI: 1.04–20.28). No significant association between the diabetes GRS and OS was observed across different BMI and PR groups. Conclusions Our study suggested that genetic susceptibility of T2D was positively associated with total mortality among women with ER- breast cancer, particularly among subjects with a history of diabetes. Additional studies are warranted to verify the associations and elucidate the underlying biological mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping-Ping Bao
- Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Prevention & Control, 1380 Zhongshan Road West, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-Guo Zhao
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue, Suite 600, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Yu-Tang Gao
- Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, 2200/25 Xie Tu Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Zheng
- Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Prevention & Control, 1380 Zhongshan Road West, Shanghai, China
| | - Ben Zhang
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue, Suite 600, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Hui Cai
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue, Suite 600, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue, Suite 600, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue, Suite 600, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Wei Lu
- Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Prevention & Control, 1380 Zhongshan Road West, Shanghai, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sarfati D, Gurney J, Stanley J, Koea J. A retrospective cohort study of patients with stomach and liver cancers: the impact of comorbidity and ethnicity on cancer care and outcomes. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:821. [PMID: 25380581 PMCID: PMC4233029 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2014] [Accepted: 10/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comorbidity has an adverse impact on cancer survival partly through its negative impact on receipt of curative treatment. Comorbidity is unevenly distributed within populations, with some ethnic and socioeconomic groups having considerably higher burden. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-relationships between comorbidity, ethnicity, receipt of treatment, and cancer survival among patients with stomach and liver cancer in New Zealand. METHODS Using the New Zealand Cancer Registry, Māori patients diagnosed with stomach and liver cancers were identified (n = 269), and compared with a randomly selected group of non-Māori patients (n = 255). Clinical and outcome data were collected from medical records, and the administrative hospitalisation and mortality databases. Logistic and Cox regression modelling with multivariable adjustment were used to examine the impacts of ethnicity and comorbidity on receipt of treatment, and the impact of these variables on all-cause and cancer specific survival. RESULTS More than 70% of patients had died by two years post-diagnosis. As comorbidity burden increased among those with Stage I-III disease, the likelihood that the patient would receive curative surgery decreased (e.g. C3 Index score 6 vs 0, adjusted OR: 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.78) and risk of mortality increased (e.g. C3 Index score 6 vs 0, adjusted all-cause HR: 1.44, 95% CI 0.93-2.23). Receipt of curative surgery reduced this excess mortality, in some cases substantially; but the extent to which this occurred varied by level of comorbidity. Māori patients had somewhat higher levels of comorbidity (34% in highest comorbidity category compared with 23% for non-Māori) and poorer survival that was not explained by age, sex, site, stage, comorbidity or receipt of curative surgery (adjusted cancer-specific HR: 1.36, 95% CI 0.97-1.90; adjusted all-cause HR: 1.33, 95% CI 0.97-1.82). Access to healthcare factors accounted for 25-36% of this survival difference. CONCLUSIONS Patients with comorbidity were substantially less likely to receive curative surgery and more likely to die than those without comorbidity. Receipt of curative surgery markedly reduced their excess mortality. Despite no discernible difference in likelihood of curative treatment receipt, Māori remained more likely to die than non-Māori even after adjusting for confounding and mediating variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Sarfati
- />Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, 6242 New Zealand
| | - Jason Gurney
- />Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, 6242 New Zealand
| | - James Stanley
- />University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, 6242 New Zealand
| | - Jonathan Koea
- />Waitemata District Health Board, Takapuna, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sinding C, Warren R, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Sussman J. Research in cancer care disparities in countries with universal healthcare: mapping the field and its conceptual contours. Support Care Cancer 2014; 22:3101-20. [PMID: 25120008 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2348-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2014] [Accepted: 06/29/2014] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The paper reviews published studies focused on disparities in receipt of cancer treatments and supportive care services in countries where cancer care is free at the point of access. We map these studies in terms of the equity stratifiers they examined, the countries in which they took place, and the care settings and cancer populations they investigated. Based on this map, we reflect on patterns of scholarly attention to equity and disparity in cancer care. We then consider conceptual challenges and opportunities in the field, including how treatment disparities are defined, how equity stratifiers are defined and conceptualized and how disparities are explained, with special attention to the challenge of psychosocial explanations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Sinding
- School of Social Work & Department of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nishri ED, Sheppard AJ, Withrow DR, Marrett LD. Cancer survival among First Nations people of Ontario, Canada (1968-2007). Int J Cancer 2014; 136:639-45. [PMID: 24923728 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2014] [Accepted: 05/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to compare cancer survival in Ontario First Nations people to that in other Ontarians for five major cancer types: colorectal, lung, cervix, breast and prostate. A list of registered or "Status" Indians in Ontario was used to create a cohort of over 140,000 Ontario First Nations people. Cancers diagnosed in cohort members between 1968 and 2001 were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry, with follow-up for death until December 31st, 2007. Flexible parametric modeling of the hazard function was used to compare the survival experience of the cohort to that of other Ontarians. We considered changes in survival from the first half of the time period (1968-1991) to the second half (1992-2001). For other Ontarians, survival had improved over time for every cancer site. For the First Nations cohort, survival improved only for breast and prostate cancers; it either declined or remained unchanged for the other cancers. For cancers diagnosed in 1992 or later, all-cause and cause-specific survival was significantly poorer for First Nations people diagnosed with breast, prostate, cervical, colorectal (male and female) and male lung cancers as compared to their non-First Nations peers. For female lung cancer, First Nations women appeared to have poorer survival; however, the result was not statistically significant. Ontario's First Nations population experiences poorer cancer survival when compared to other Ontarians and strategies to reduce these inequalities must be developed and implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Diane Nishri
- Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Marjerrison S, Pole JD, Sung L. Inferior survival among Aboriginal children with cancer in Ontario. Cancer 2014; 120:2751-9. [PMID: 24824592 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2013] [Revised: 03/17/2014] [Accepted: 04/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric cancer distribution and outcomes have not been examined in Canadian Aboriginal children. The objective of this study was to describe the distribution, event-free survival, and overall survival of Aboriginal children with malignancies who reside in Ontario compared with non-Aboriginal children. METHODS This population-based study included 10,520 Ontario children (aged <18 years) who were diagnosed with cancer between 1985 and 2011. Patients were identified from the Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Networked Information System database. Aboriginal children were identified by self-reported ethnicity or postal code on a Native reserve at diagnosis. Descriptive statistics of the patients were presented and compared using the Fisher exact test. Event-free and overall survival probabilities were calculated for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children, described using Kaplan-Meier curves, and compared using log-rank tests. RESULTS In total, 65 Aboriginal children and 10,364 non-Aboriginal children with malignancy were identified. The distribution of malignancy type was similar between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, presence of metastatic disease, or treatment approach (clinical trial, standard of care, or individualized protocol) between the groups. The 5e-year event-free survival rate (± standard error) was 56.3% ± 6.2% among Aboriginal children versus 72.8% ± 0.4% among non-Aboriginal children (P = .0042), and the 5-year overall survival rate was 64% ± 6.0% versus 79.3 ± 0.4% (P = .0017), respectively. The cause of death did not vary according to Aboriginal ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS Survival was significantly inferior among Aboriginal children who had cancer compared with non-Aboriginal children who had cancer in Ontario. Future studies are required to define the etiology of this disparity, evaluate the issue nationally, and create interventions to improve outcomes for Aboriginal children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Marjerrison
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Treatment and outcomes in diabetic breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 143:551-70. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2833-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2013] [Accepted: 01/07/2014] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
26
|
Søgaard M, Thomsen RW, Bossen KS, Sørensen HT, Nørgaard M. The impact of comorbidity on cancer survival: a review. Clin Epidemiol 2013; 5:3-29. [PMID: 24227920 PMCID: PMC3820483 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s47150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 396] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A number of studies have shown poorer survival among cancer patients with comorbidity. Several mechanisms may underlie this finding. In this review we summarize the current literature on the association between patient comorbidity and cancer prognosis. Prognostic factors examined include tumor biology, diagnosis, treatment, clinical quality, and adherence. Methods All English-language articles published during 2002–2012 on the association between comorbidity and survival among patients with colon cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer were identified from PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase. Titles and abstracts were reviewed to identify eligible studies and their main results were then extracted. Results Our search yielded more than 2,500 articles related to comorbidity and cancer, but few investigated the prognostic impact of comorbidity as a primary aim. Most studies found that cancer patients with comorbidity had poorer survival than those without comorbidity, with 5-year mortality hazard ratios ranging from 1.1 to 5.8. Few studies examined the influence of specific chronic conditions. In general, comorbidity does not appear to be associated with more aggressive types of cancer or other differences in tumor biology. Presence of specific severe comorbidities or psychiatric disorders were found to be associated with delayed cancer diagnosis in some studies, while chronic diseases requiring regular medical visits were associated with earlier cancer detection in others. Another finding was that patients with comorbidity do not receive standard cancer treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy as often as patients without comorbidity, and their chance of completing a course of cancer treatment is lower. Postoperative complications and mortality are higher in patients with comorbidity. It is unclear from the literature whether the apparent undertreatment reflects appropriate consideration of greater toxicity risk, poorer clinical quality, patient preferences, or poor adherence among patients with comorbidity. Conclusion Despite increasing recognition of the importance of comorbid illnesses among cancer patients, major challenges remain. Both treatment effectiveness and compliance appear compromised among cancer patients with comorbidity. Data on clinical quality is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Søgaard
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nechuta S, Lu W, Zheng Y, Cai H, Bao PP, Gu K, Zheng W, Shu XO. Comorbidities and breast cancer survival: a report from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Survival Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 139:227-35. [PMID: 23605082 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2521-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2013] [Accepted: 04/01/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
We investigated the association of major comorbidities with breast cancer outcomes using the Shanghai Breast Cancer Survival Study, a population-based, prospective cohort study of Chinese women diagnosed with breast cancer. Analyses included 4,664 women diagnosed with stage I-III incident breast cancer aged 20-75 years (median age = 51) during 2002-2006. Women were interviewed at 3-11 months post-diagnosis (median = 6.4) and followed up by in-person interviews and linkage with the vital statistics registry. Multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and (95 % confidence intervals (CIs)) for the associations of comorbidities with breast cancer outcomes were estimated using Cox regression models. After a median follow-up of 5.3 years (range: 0.64-8.9), 647 women died (516 from breast cancer) and 632 recurrence/metastases were documented. The main comorbidities reported included: hypertension (22.4 %), chronic gastritis (14.3 %), diabetes mellitus (6.2 %), chronic bronchitis/asthma (5.8 %), coronary heart disease (5.0 %), and stroke (2.2 %). Diabetes was associated with increased risk of total mortality (adjusted HR: 1.40 (1.06-1.85)) and non-breast cancer mortality (adjusted HR: 2.64 (1.63-4.27)), but not breast cancer-specific mortality (adjusted HR: 0.98 (0.68-1.41)), adjusting for socio-demographics, clinical characteristics, selected lifestyle factors, and other comorbidities. Women with a history of stroke had a non-significant increased risk of total mortality (adjusted HR: 1.42 (0.91-2.22)) and a significant increased risk of non-breast cancer mortality (adjusted HR: 2.52 (1.33-4.78)), but not breast cancer-specific mortality (adjusted HR: 0.78 (0.38-1.62)). Overall, none of the comorbidities investigated were significantly associated with recurrence. In this large prospective cohort of breast cancer survivors, diabetes was significantly associated with increased risk of total and non-breast cancer mortality, and history of stroke was associated with increased risk of non-breast cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Nechuta
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37203-1738, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Racial and ethnic differences in health status and health behavior among breast cancer survivors--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2009. J Cancer Surviv 2012; 7:93-103. [PMID: 23212604 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-012-0248-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2012] [Accepted: 10/08/2012] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Differences in health status and behavioral risk factors may explain racial/ethnic breast cancer disparities. We examined racial/ethnic differences in health status and behaviors among female breast cancer survivors compared to females without breast cancer. METHODS Using cross-sectional data from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a national state-based, random sample telephone survey, we explored differences in self-rated health, obesity and selected behaviors (physical activity, smoking, alcohol use, fruit, and vegetable consumption) among females aged 18 years and older, who reported a previous breast cancer diagnosis (survivors, n = 10,035) and those who reported no breast cancer history (n = 234,375) by race/ethnicity. Adjusted prevalences of health status and behaviors, accounting for sociodemographics, comorbidities and health care access, were estimated by race/ethnicity. RESULTS Compared to all other racial/ethnic groups, more white females reported heavy alcohol consumption and more black females reported obesity regardless of their breast cancer status. Among breast cancer survivors, more whites (33.7 %) were former smokers compared to blacks (24.5 %), "others" (20.5 %), and Hispanics (16.2 %) (p = 0.001). Racial/ethnic differences in obesity also varied by reported time since diagnosis (p value = 0.018). Among long-term survivors (diagnosed >5 years before interview), more black survivors (34.8 %) reported obesity compared to white survivors (23.0 %). Also, among "other" race survivors, long-term survivors (22.0 %) reported more obesity than survivors diagnosed less than 5 years before interview (7.8 %). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest opportunities to increase health behaviors and reduce racial disparities among breast cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Engaging in healthy behaviors can play a significant role in enhancing health outcomes and quality of life of breast cancer survivors. More research is needed to better understand racial differences in obesity, smoking and alcohol consumption in order to develop effective, culturally appropriate interventions to promote a healthy lifestyle after a breast cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
|