1
|
Julian McFarlane S, Occa A, Peng W, Awonuga O, Morgan SE. Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) to Enhance Participation of Racial/Ethnic Minorities in Clinical Trials: A 10-Year Systematic Review. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2022; 37:1075-1092. [PMID: 34420460 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1943978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
There has not been a significant improvement in the rate of clinical trial accrual in more than 20 years. Worse, the challenge of inadequate representation among racial and ethnic minorities also persists, deepening disparities in health. Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) is a participatory communication method that centers on effective dialogue between researchers and community stakeholders with the goal of creating an equitable partnership for health and social change. The objective of the current study was to provide an update since a systematic review in 2012, on the current status of the empirical research, with a particular focus on the elements of CBPR methods used to improve the rate of accrual of members of racial and ethnic minority communities for clinical trials. Our systematic review found a large increase in the number of CBPR related studies and studies related to racial and ethnic representation in research. More than 85% of studies employing CBPR methods saw statistically positive outcomes. Specifically, the elements of CBPR that are associated with these positive outcomes include community partner participation in (1) a study advisory committee, (2) data collection, (3) the development of interventions, and (4) participant recruitment. However, the results of our study indicate that researchers need to be more transparent about the extent of community participation as well as more thoroughly and accurately describe the nature of the partnership with members of minority communities in order to build upon the scientific literature on community-engaged methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aurora Occa
- Department of Communication, University of Kentucky
| | - Wei Peng
- Murrow College of Communication, Washington State University
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rodríguez Espinosa P, Sussman A, Pearson CR, Oetzel JG, Wallerstein N. Personal Outcomes in Community-based Participatory Research Partnerships: A Cross-site Mixed Methods Study. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY 2020; 66:439-449. [PMID: 32706125 PMCID: PMC7772261 DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has been embraced by diverse populations to address health inequities within their communities. CBPR has been shown to produce favorable health outcomes, but little is known about personal outcomes (e.g., individual growth and capacities) resulting from the direct involvement in a CBPR partnership. We empirically examine which CBPR partnerships' processes and practices are associated with personal outcomes. We hypothesize that higher levels of collaborative approaches and adherence to CBPR principles and practices would be associated with personal outcomes. Based on a national cross-site CBPR study, Research for Improved Health, we utilized mixed-method data from a comprehensive community-engagement survey (N = 450) and seven in-depth case studies to explore the hypothesized relationships. Our multivariate mixed-effects model revealed the importance of various partnering practices. Relationship dynamics emerged as key predictors including the following: respect in the partnership, voice and influence in decision-making among partners, and stewardship. Qualitative findings highlighted individual, partnership, and community-level impacts, within and beyond the partnership. Our findings have implications for CBPR best practices and highlight the potential role of personal outcomes for partnerships' sustainability, long-term outcomes, and health equity research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Sussman
- Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Cynthia R Pearson
- Indigenous Wellness Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John G Oetzel
- School of Management and Marketing, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Nina Wallerstein
- College of Population Health, Center for Participatory Research, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bevel M, Babatunde OA, Heiney SP, Brandt HM, Wirth MD, Hurley TG, Khan S, Johnson H, Wineglass CM, Warren TY, Murphy EA, Sercy E, Thomas AS, Hébert JR, Adams SA. Sistas Inspiring Sistas Through Activity and Support (SISTAS): Study Design and Demographics of Participants. Ethn Dis 2018; 28:75-84. [PMID: 29725191 DOI: 10.18865/ed.28.2.75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Recruiting racial, ethnic, and other underserved minorities into conventional clinic-based and other trials is known to be challenging. The Sistas Inspiring Sistas Through Activity and Support (SISTAS) Program was a one-year randomized controlled trial (RCT) to promote physical activity and healthy eating among AA women in SC to reduce inflammatory biomarkers, which are linked to increased breast cancer (BrCa) risk and mortality. This study describes the development, recruitment, and implementation of the SISTAS clinical trial and provides baseline characteristics of the study participants. Methods SISTAS was developed using community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches. At baseline, study participants completed assessments and underwent clinical measurements and blood draws to measure C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Participants randomized to the intervention received 12 weekly classes followed by nine monthly booster sessions. Post-intervention measurements were assessed at 12-week and 12-month follow-ups. Results We recruited a total of 337 women who tended to: be middle-aged (mean age 48.2 years); have some college education; be employed full-time; have Medicare as their primary insurance; be non-smokers; and perceive their personal health as good. On average, the women were pre-hypertensive at baseline (mean systolic blood pressure = 133.9 mm Hg; mean diastolic blood pressure = 84.0 mm Hg) and morbidly obese (mean BMI >40.0 kg/m2); the mean fat mass and fat-free mass among participants were 106.4 lb and 121.0 lb, respectively. Conclusion The SISTAS RCT addresses some of the gaps in the literature with respect to CBPR interventions targeting AA women, such as implementing diet and physical activity in CBPR-based studies to decrease BrCa risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm Bevel
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Oluwole A Babatunde
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Sue P Heiney
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina
| | - Heather M Brandt
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina.,Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Michael D Wirth
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Thomas G Hurley
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Samira Khan
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Hiluv Johnson
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Cassandra M Wineglass
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Tatiana Y Warren
- Community Works, Bon Secours Baltimore Health Systems; Baltimore, Maryland
| | - E Angela Murphy
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina
| | - Erica Sercy
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Amanda S Thomas
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - James R Hébert
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina.,College of Nursing, University of South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Melvin CL, Jefferson MS, Rice LJ, Nemeth LS, Wessell AM, Nietert PJ, Hughes-Halbert C. A systematic review of lifestyle counseling for diverse patients in primary care. Prev Med 2017; 100:67-75. [PMID: 28344120 PMCID: PMC6086607 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2016] [Revised: 03/16/2017] [Accepted: 03/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Prior research and systematic reviews have examined strategies related to weight management, less is known about lifestyle and behavioral counseling interventions optimally suited for implementation in primary care practices generally, and among racial and ethnic patient populations. Primary care practitioners may find it difficult to access and use available research findings on effective behavioral and lifestyle counseling strategies and to assess their effects on health behaviors among their patients. This systematic review compiled existing evidence from randomized trials to inform primary care providers about which lifestyle and behavioral change interventions are shown to be effective for changing patients' diet, physical activity and weight outcomes. Searches identified 444 abstracts from all sources (01/01/2004-05/15/2014). Duplicate abstracts were removed, selection criteria applied and dual abstractions conducted for 106 full text articles. As of June 12, 2015, 29 articles were retained for inclusion in the body of evidence. Randomized trials tested heterogeneous multi-component behavioral interventions for an equally wide array of outcomes in three population groups: diverse patient populations (23 studies), African American patients only (4 studies), and Hispanic/Mexican American/Latino patients only (2 studies). Significant and consistent findings among diverse populations showed that weight and physical activity related outcomes were more amenable to change via lifestyle and behavioral counseling interventions than those associated with diet modification. Evidence to support specific interventions for racial and ethnic minorities was promising, but insufficient based on the small number of studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy L Melvin
- Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, United States; Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Public Health Sciences, Charleston, SC, United States.
| | - Melanie S Jefferson
- Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, United States; Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - LaShanta J Rice
- Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, United States; Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Lynne S Nemeth
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Nursing, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Andrea M Wessell
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Family Medicine, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Paul J Nietert
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Public Health Sciences, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Chanita Hughes-Halbert
- Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, United States; Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Charleston, SC, United States; Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Hospital, Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Halbert CH, Bellamy S, Briggs V, Delmoor E, Purnell J, Rogers R, Weathers B, Johnson JC. A comparative effectiveness education trial for lifestyle health behavior change in African Americans. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH 2017; 32:207-218. [PMID: 28335038 PMCID: PMC5914351 DOI: 10.1093/her/cyx039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2015] [Accepted: 03/06/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Obesity and excess weight are significant clinical and public health issues that disproportionately affect African Americans because of physical inactivity and unhealthy eating. We compared the effects of alternate behavioral interventions on obesity-related health behaviors. We conducted a comparative effectiveness education trial in a community-based sample of 530 adult African Americans. Outcomes variables were physical activity (PA) and fruit and vegetable intake. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline and 1-month following interventions about shared risk factors for cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) (integrated, INT) or CVD only (disease-specific). Significant increases were found in the proportion of participants who met PA guidelines from baseline (47.4%) to follow-up (52.4%) (P = 0.005). In the stratified analysis that were conducted to examine interaction between education and intervention group assignment, this effect was most apparent among participants who had ≤high school education and were randomized to INT (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.04, 5.00, P = 0.04). Completing the intervention was associated with a 1.78 odds of meeting PA guidelines (95% CI = 1.02, 3.10, P = 0.04). Education about risk factors for chronic disease and evidence-based strategies for health behavior change may be useful for addressing obesity-related behaviors among African Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanita Hughes Halbert
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Ralph H. Johnson Veteran Administration Medical Center, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Scarlett Bellamy
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Vanessa Briggs
- Health Promotion Council of Southeastern Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
| | - Ernestine Delmoor
- National Black Leadership Initiative on Cancer, Philadelphia Chapter, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | - Rodney Rogers
- Christ of Calvary Community Development Corporation, Philadelphia, PA 19143, USA
| | - Benita Weathers
- Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jerry C. Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Halbert CH, McDonald J, Vadaparampil S, Rice L, Jefferson M. Conducting Precision Medicine Research with African Americans. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0154850. [PMID: 27441706 PMCID: PMC4956119 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2015] [Accepted: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Precision medicine is an approach to detecting, treating, and managing disease that is based on individual variation in genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. Precision medicine is expected to reduce health disparities, but this will be possible only if studies have adequate representation of racial minorities. Objective It is critical to anticipate the rates at which individuals from diverse populations are likely to participate in precision medicine studies as research initiatives are being developed. We evaluated the likelihood of participating in a clinical study for precision medicine. Design, Setting, Participants Observational study conducted between October 2010 and February 2011 in a national sample of African Americans. Main Outcome Measure Intentions to participate in a government sponsored study that involves providing a biospecimen and generates data that could be shared with other researchers to conduct future studies. Results One third of respondents would participate in a clinical study for precision medicine. Only gender had a significant independent association with participation intentions. Men had a 1.86 (95% CI = 1.11, 3.12, p = 0.02) increased likelihood of participating in a precision medicine study compared to women in the model that included overall barriers and facilitators. In the model with specific participation barriers, distrust was associated with a reduced likelihood of participating in the research described in the vignette (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.34, 0.96, p = 0.04). Conclusion and Relevance African Americans may have low enrollment in PMI research. As PMI research is implemented, extensive efforts will be needed to ensure adequate representation. Additional research is needed to identify optimal ways of ethically describing precision medicine studies to ensure sufficient recruitment of racial minorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanita Hughes Halbert
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America
- Ralph H. Johnson Veteran’s Administration Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Jasmine McDonald
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States of America
| | | | - LaShanta Rice
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America
| | - Melanie Jefferson
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Halbert CH, Gattoni-Celli S, Savage S, Prasad SM, Kittles R, Briggs V, Delmoor E, Rice LJ, Jefferson M, Johnson JC. Ever and Annual Use of Prostate Cancer Screening in African American Men. Am J Mens Health 2016; 11:99-107. [PMID: 26240090 DOI: 10.1177/1557988315596225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Since prostate cancer continues to disproportionately affect African American men in terms of incidence, morbidity, and mortality, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening plays an important role in early detection, especially when men engage in informed decision making to accept or decline this test. The authors evaluated utilization of PSA testing among African American men based on factors that are important components of making informed decisions. Utilization of PSA testing was evaluated based on whether men had ever had PSA testing and PSA testing during the past year in a community-based sample of African American men ages 50 to 75 ( n = 132). Overall, 64% of men ( n = 85) reported that they had ever had a PSA test; the mean ( SD) age for first use of PSA testing was 47.7 ( SD = 7.4). The likelihood of ever having a PSA test increased significantly with physician communication (odds ratio [OR] = 14.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.20, 48.10; p = .0001) and with having an annual household income that was greater than $20,000 (OR = 9.80; 95% CI = 3.15, 30.51; p = .0001). The odds of ever having a PSA test were also decreased with each unit increase in future temporal orientation (OR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.47, 0.93; p = .02). Of the men who had ever had PSA testing, 57% were screened during the past year. Only health insurance status had a significant independent association with having annual PSA testing (OR = 5.10; 95% CI = 1.67, 15.60; p = .004). Different factors were associated significantly with ever having PSA testing and annual testing among African American men. African American men may not be making an informed decision about prostate cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanita Hughes Halbert
- 1 Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.,2 Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Administration Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Sebastiano Gattoni-Celli
- 1 Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.,2 Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Administration Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Stephen Savage
- 1 Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.,2 Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Administration Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Sandip M Prasad
- 1 Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.,2 Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Administration Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - Vanessa Briggs
- 4 Health Promotion Council of Southeastern Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ernestine Delmoor
- 5 Philadelphia Chapter, National Black Leadership Initiative on Cancer, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rice LJ, Hughes B, Briggs V, Delmoor E, Jefferson M, Johnson JC, Halbert CH. Perceived Efficacy and Control for Neighborhood Change: the Cross-Cutting Role of Collective Efficacy. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2015; 3:667-675. [PMID: 27294763 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-015-0185-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2015] [Revised: 10/22/2015] [Accepted: 10/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The premise of community advocacy is to empower residents by increasing their capacity to address and change neighborhood and structural factors that contribute to adverse health outcomes. An underlying assumption is that community residents will advocate for public policy and other changes. However, limited empirical evidence exists on community residents' perceived ability to advocate for neighborhood change. In this study, we characterized perceived neighborhood control and efficacy for neighborhood change and evaluated independent associations between efficacy and control beliefs and sociodemographic factors, community involvement, and perceptions of social environment. METHODS Cross-sectional data from 488 African American adults were analyzed to describe efficacy and control beliefs and to characterize bivariate associations between these beliefs and sociodemographic factors, social environment, and community involvement variables. Variables with significant relationships (p < 0.10) were included in a multivariate logistic regression model to identify factors having significant independent associations with efficacy and control beliefs. RESULTS Overall, beliefs about neighborhood control and confidence were varied, yet approximately half of residents (49 and 55 %, respectively) reported having a little control over things that happen in their neighborhood and a little confidence in their ability to change things where they live. The likelihood of reporting confidence to make neighborhood improvements increased with greater collective efficacy (OR = 1.78, 95 % CI = 1.19-1.31, p = 0.002). In addition, participants who were involved in a community organization were more likely to report confidence to improve their neighborhood (OR = 2.03, 95 % CI = 1.21-3.42, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION Efforts are needed to improve residents' ability to become positive agents of change in their community. Creating a research infrastructure within academic community partnerships that focus on strengthening advocacy and public policy may improve resident's efficacy and ability to seek and encourage neighborhood change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LaShanta J Rice
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. .,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, Suite BE103, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| | - Brenda Hughes
- Department of Health and Environmental Control, Walterboro, SC, USA
| | - Vanessa Briggs
- Health Promotion Council of Southeastern Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ernestine Delmoor
- National Black Leadership Initiative on Cancer, Philadelphia Chapter, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Melanie Jefferson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Jerry C Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chanita Hughes Halbert
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.,Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hughes Halbert C, Welch B, Lynch C, Magwood G, Rice L, Jefferson M, Riley J. Social determinants of family health history collection. J Community Genet 2015; 7:57-64. [PMID: 26280996 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-015-0251-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2015] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Family health history (FHH) is the most basic form of genomic information. Although public health efforts have been made to promote FHH collection, empirical data on the extent to which community residents in rural areas actively collect FHH is limited. Therefore, we examined rates of FHH collection in a community-based sample of South Carolina residents. We conducted a structured telephone survey in a random sample of black and white South Carolina residents. Respondents were asked if they had ever actively collected FHH from relatives using an item developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Overall, 42 % of respondents reported that they had actively collected their FHH. Blacks were significantly more likely than whites to have collected their FHH in bivariate analysis, but race did not have a significant association with FHH collection in the multivariate model (OR = 1.36, 95 % CI = 0.79, 2.35, p = 0.26). The likelihood of collecting FHH was increased among respondents whose last medical visit occurred in the past year compared to those whose last medical visit was more than 1 year ago (OR = 2.00, 95 % CI = 1.12, 3.56, p = 0.02). In addition, older respondents had a reduced likelihood of collecting their FHH (OR = 0.69, 95 % CI = 0.53, 0.90, p = .01). Lastly, women were about twice as likely as men to have collected their FHH (OR = 1.83, 95 % CI = 1.12, 2.99, p = 0.02). Greater efforts are needed to increase the collection of FHH information; these efforts may need to target men, the elderly, and individuals who have not had a recent medical visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanita Hughes Halbert
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, Suite BE103, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Veteran Administration Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Brandon Welch
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Cheryl Lynch
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Veteran Administration Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Gayenell Magwood
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - LaShanta Rice
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, Suite BE103, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Melanie Jefferson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, Suite BE103, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Jodie Riley
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, Suite BE103, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|