How do differences in treatment impact racial and ethnic disparities in acute myeloid leukemia?

Racial and ethnic disparities in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 15-year experience at a safety net hospital system

Despite recent therapeutic advances, ethnic minorities in the U.S. continue to have disproportionately poor outcomes in many hematologic malignancies including AML. We identified 162 adult AML patients treated at a non-transplant safety net hospital from 2007 to 2022 and evaluated differences in disease characteristics, treatment and clinical outcomes based on race and ethnicity. Our cohort consisted of 82 (50.6%) Hispanic, 36 (22.2%) non-Hispanic black and 44 (27.2%) non-Hispanic white and Asian patients. Median age at diagnosis was 42.5, 49.0 and 52.5 years respectively (p=0.025). Hispanics had higher rates of intermediate and high-risk disease (p=0.699) and received high intensity induction and consolidation chemotherapy at lower rates (p=0.962), although differences did not reach statistical significance. Despite this, similar remission rates were achieved. Hispanics with high-risk disease had longer overall survival (OS) than the combined non-Hispanic cohort (mOS 14 m vs 7 m, p=0.030). Multivariate regression analysis showed that OS was negatively associated with age (HR 1.023, p=0.006), intermediate (HR 3.431, p=0.0003) and high-risk disease (HR 4.689, p<0.0001) and positively associated with Hispanic ethnicity (HR 0.614, p=0.026). This report suggests that contrary to other studies, Hispanics, particularly those with high-risk AML, may have improved OS compared to other ethnic groups. These results are unique to our safety net hospital setting where common barriers to medical care and healthcare disparities are largely mitigated.

Disparities in acute myeloid leukemia treatments and outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to summarize different contributors to survival disparities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. The focus is set on African-American (hereafter referred to as Black) patients, with separate consideration of self-reported race and ancestry. It aims to also highlight the interconnectivity of the different features that impact on despair survival.

RECENT FINDINGS

The main themes in the literature covered in this article include the impact of social deprivation, clinical trial enrollment and biobanking, structural racism and ancestry-associated differences in genetic features on survival outcomes.

SUMMARY

An increasing number of studies have not only shown persistent survival disparities between Black and non-Hispanic White AML patients, but uncovered a multitude of contributors that have additive adverse effects on patient outcomes. In addition to potentially modifiable features, such as socioeconomic factors and trial enrollment odds that require urgent interventions, there is emerging data on differences in disease biology with respect to genetic ancestry, including frequencies of known AML-driver mutations and their associated prognostic impact.

Sociodemographic associations with uptake of novel therapies for acute myeloid leukemia

Inequitable uptake of novel therapies (NT) in non-cancer settings are known for patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES), People of Color (POC), and older adults. NT uptake equity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is not well known. We performed a retrospective cohort study (1/2014-8/2022) of the United States nationwide Flatiron HealthTM electronic health record-derived, de-identified database. We estimated sociodemographic associations with AML NT receipt using incidence rate ratios (IRR). Odds ratios (OR) assessed differences in venetoclax (the most common NT) receipt at community sites and between site characteristics and NT adoption. Of 8081 patients (139 sites), 3102 (38%) received a NT. NT use increased annually (IRR 1.14, 95% confidence interval [1.07, 1.22]). NT receipt was similar between Non-Hispanic-Whites and POC (IRR 1.03, [0.91, 1.17]) and as age increased (IRR 1.02 [0.97, 1.07]). At community sites, Non-Hispanic-Whites were less likely to receive venetoclax (OR 0.77 [0.66, 0.91]); older age (OR 1.05 [1.04, 1.05]) and higher area-level SES were associated with venetoclax receipt (OR 1.23 [1.05, 1.43]). Early NT adopting sites had more prescribing physicians (OR 1.25 [1.13, 1.43]) and higher SES strata patients (OR 2.81 [1.08, 7.66]). Inequities in AML NT uptake were seen by SES; for venetoclax, differential uptake reflects its label indication for older adults and those with comorbidities.

Lessons to inform interventions to reduce racial and ethnic health disparities within hematologic malignancies

Although racial and ethnic disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and survival have been well documented within the field of hematologic malignancies, very little work has focused on testing interventions that may reduce these disparities. The aim of this commentary is to review prior work in hematologic malignancies and explore new opportunities to develop disparity-reducing interventions by drawing from evidence-based strategies that have been successfully implemented in fields related to hematologic malignancies, including oncology and solid organ transplants. Relevant literature demonstrates that patient navigation and broader insurance coverage have been shown to reduce racial and ethnic disparities among patients with solid malignancies such as colorectal and breast cancer. Evidence-based strategies that might be most applicable to the field of hematologic malignancies include patient navigation and policy changes.

Health disparity in use of novel agents for first-line therapy in Black and White patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the Department of Veterans Affairs

BACKGROUND: Novel agents (NAs) (ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax) were first introduced in 2013 as therapeutic options to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). OBJECTIVES: To determine if the uptake of NAs for first-line treatment was similar in Black and White patients with CLL treated in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including adults with CLL managed in the VA from October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2017. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic data, and appropriate bivariable statistical tests were used to compare NA use, baseline characteristics, health outcomes, and complications. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with uptake of NAs. The study included 565 patients; 86% were White and 14% were Black. Black patients were younger than White patients (median age [66 vs 69 years; P < 0.01]) but had similar median baseline Charlson comorbidity scores (4 vs 5). RESULTS: Overall, Black patients were less likely to receive NAs than White patients (14% vs 26%; P = 0.02). The gap narrowed over the study period: 4% vs 17% (2014), 13% vs 25% (2015), 17% vs 33% (2016), and 31% vs 33% (2017). Black race (P = 0.02) and fiscal year (P < 0.01) were the only variables significantly associated with NA use in the multivariable model. Health outcomes and most complications were similar for Black and White patients despite the difference in prescribing patterns. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to identify a potential health disparity with respect to use of NAs among Black and White patients with CLL treated in the VA. Fortunately, health outcomes and most complications were similar for Black and White patients despite the difference in prescribing patterns. DISCLOSURES: Funding for the study was provided by AstraZeneca as a research grant to the Foundation for Advancing Veterans' Health Research (FAVHR), a non-profit entity within the Audie L. Murphy Veterans Hospital, San Antonio, TX. Drs Nooruddin and Frei have received research grants (paid to FAVHR) from AstraZeneca in the last 3 years. Ms Ryan is an employee of AstraZeneca. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Institutes of Health, or the authors' affiliated institutions.

Racial/ethnic disparities for leukemias in Puerto Rico and the United States of America, 2015-2019

BACKGROUND

Leukemia is a cancer of the early-forming cells. Over the past decade, leukemia racial/ethnic disparities have been documented in the United States of America (USA). Although the Puerto Rican population in the USA represents the second-largest Hispanic population in the nation, most of the existing studies do not include Puerto Rico. We compared the incidence and mortality rates for leukemia and its subtypes in Puerto Rico and four racial/ethnic groups in the USA.

METHODS

We used data from the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (2015-2019). The racial/ethnic groups studied were non-Hispanic whites (NHW), non-Hispanic blacks (NHB), Hispanics (USH), and Asian/Pacific Islanders (NHAPI) living in the USA and the Puerto Rico population. We calculated the incidence and mortality rates. The relative risk of developing or dying due to leukemia was also calculated.

RESULTS

Compared with Puerto Rico, NHW [standardized incidence rate (SIR) = 1.47; 95%CI = 1.40-1.53; standardized mortality rates (SMR) = 1.55; 95%CI = 1.45-1.65)] and NHB (SIR = 1.09; 95%CI = 1.04-1.15; SMR = 1.27; 95%CI = 1.19-1.35) had higher incidence and mortality rates; but lower than the NHAPI (SIR = 0.78; 95%CI = 0.74-0.82; SMR = 0.83; 95%CI = 0.77-0.89); and similar to USH. However, we found differences among leukemia subtypes. For example, NHAPI and USH had lower risk of developing chronic leukemias than Puerto Rico. We found a lower risk to develop acute lymphocytic leukemia in NHB than in Puerto Rico.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides a better understanding of leukemia's racial/ethnic disparities and fills a knowledge gap by examining the incidence and mortality rates in Puerto Rico. Future studies are needed to better understand the factors influencing the differences found in the incidence and mortality of leukemia among different racial/ethnic groups.

Trends in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Utilization and Estimated Unmet Need Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is a resource-intensive procedure and the sole potentially curative treatment available for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Although Medicare coverage may help address a major financial barrier to accessing alloHCT, there remains an unmet need for alloHCT owing to sociodemographic disparities. This study examined trends and factors associated with the utilization of alloHCT and the estimated unmet need for alloHCT among Medicare beneficiaries with AML. This retrospective cohort study included patients (age 65 to 74 years) with a diagnosis of AML identified in Medicare claims data from 2010 through 2016. To study trends in utilization, transplantation rates were calculated as the number of patients who underwent alloHCT within 180 days and 1 year of diagnosis (numerator) divided by the total number of patients with AML within each diagnosis year (denominator). A multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the likelihood of undergoing alloHCT within 1 year of diagnosis. Two approaches were applied to estimate the unmet need for alloHCT. The first approach used claims data to identify the potential need for alloHCT among patients who achieved complete remission for at least 90 days. The second approach used established National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) methodology, which considers estimates of risk level, response to treatment, comorbidity, and early mortality, to identify the potential and unmet need for alloHCT. The overall estimated need and unmet need from 2010 to 2015 and over different time periods were evaluated for both approaches. The alloHCT rate within 180 days of diagnosis increased from 8% in 2010 to 15.8% in 2016 (P < .001), and the 1-year alloHCT rate also increased over time, from 11.9% in 2010 to 20.0% in 2015 (P < .001). The likelihood of undergoing alloHCT within 1 year of diagnosis was associated with diagnosis year, age, race, geographic region, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and population-level median household income. Between 2010 and 2015, the claims data approach estimated a lower potential need for alloHCT compared with the NMDP methodology estimate (27% versus 36%); both approaches estimated that 43% to 44% of patients with a potential need for alloHCT had an unmet treatment need. Despite the differences in estimated potential need between the 2 approaches, both showed a sustained unmet need but with a downward trend over time. Our data show that utilization of alloHCT has increased over time among Medicare beneficiaries with AML. Two approaches of need analysis were conducted for validation of estimated need and unmet need for alloHCT using claim-identified remission status, given the lack of cytogenetics and molecular information in claims data. Both approaches to estimating the unmet need for alloHCT found a downward trend over time; however, there are differences in utilization of alloHCT by age, race, geographic region, comorbidity, and socioeconomic status, indicating disparities in access to alloHCT among Medicare beneficiaries with AML. This suggests the need for policy efforts, research, and continued education to improve access to alloHCT and to close the gap between the actual utilization of alloHCT and the unmet need.

Induction Therapy and Survival for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Hispanic Adults from Puerto Rico

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common type of leukemia in adults. There are no previous studies evaluating AML treatment patterns in Puerto Rico. We describe the first-line therapy patterns and survival of patients diagnosed with AML in Puerto Rico using the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry Health Insurance Linkage Database (2011-2015).

METHODS

We describe patient characteristics according to intensive, non-intensive, and non-treatment status. We used Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the factors associated with the risk of death stratified by intensive and non-intensive therapy. For this study, 385 patients with AML were included.

RESULTS

The mean age was 67 years old and 50.1% were female. Nearly half of AML patients (46.8%) received intensive treatment, 23.6% received non-intensive treatment, and 26.2% did not receive treatment. The overall 3-year survival rate was 17.9%. Among those who received intensive therapy, the risk of death among females was lower than males (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.93). Patients 60 years or older who received intensive treatment had a higher risk of death than younger patients (HR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.09-2.55). Patients with poor/adverse risk receiving intensive (HR: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.76-6.69) or non-intensive (HR: 4.32, 95% CI: 1.66-11.28) treatment had a higher risk of death than patients with a favorable risk category.

CONCLUSION

Our findings are the first step to monitor the quality of care of patients with AML in Puerto Rico, particularly related to the administration of appropriate induction therapies, which is one of the most important predictors of AML survival.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic

IMPORTANCE

The full effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care disparities, particularly by race and ethnicity, remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether the race and ethnicity of patients with cancer was associated with disparities in cancer treatment delays, adverse social and economic effects, and concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic and to evaluate trusted sources of COVID-19 information by race and ethnicity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This national survey study of US adults with cancer compared treatment delays, adverse social and economic effects, concerns, and trusted sources of COVID-19 information by race and ethnicity from September 1, 2020, to January 12, 2021.

EXPOSURES

The COVID-19 pandemic.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was delay in cancer treatment by race and ethnicity. Secondary outcomes were duration of delay, adverse social and economic effects, concerns, and trusted sources of COVID-19 information.

RESULTS

Of 1639 invited respondents, 1240 participated (75.7% response rate) from 50 US states, the District of Columbia, and 5 US territories (744 female respondents [60.0%]; median age, 60 years [range, 24-92 years]; 266 African American or Black [hereafter referred to as Black] respondents [21.5%]; 186 Asian respondents [15.0%]; 232 Hispanic or Latinx [hereafter referred to as Latinx] respondents [18.7%]; 29 American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, or multiple races [hereafter referred to as other] respondents [2.3%]; and 527 White respondents [42.5%]). Compared with White respondents, Black respondents (odds ratio [OR], 6.13 [95% CI, 3.50-10.74]) and Latinx respondents (OR, 2.77 [95% CI, 1.49-5.14]) had greater odds of involuntary treatment delays, and Black respondents had greater odds of treatment delays greater than 4 weeks (OR, 3.13 [95% CI, 1.11-8.81]). Compared with White respondents, Black respondents (OR, 4.32 [95% CI, 2.65-7.04]) and Latinx respondents (OR, 6.13 [95% CI, 3.57-10.53]) had greater odds of food insecurity and concerns regarding food security (Black respondents: OR, 2.02 [95% CI, 1.34-3.04]; Latinx respondents: OR, 2.94 [95% CI, [1.86-4.66]), financial stability (Black respondents: OR, 3.56 [95% CI, 1.79-7.08]; Latinx respondents: OR, 4.29 [95% CI, 1.98-9.29]), and affordability of cancer treatment (Black respondents: OR, 4.27 [95% CI, 2.20-8.28]; Latinx respondents: OR, 2.81 [95% CI, 1.48-5.36]). Trusted sources of COVID-19 information varied significantly by race and ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this survey of US adults with cancer, the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with treatment delay disparities and adverse social and economic effects among Black and Latinx adults. Partnering with trusted sources may be an opportunity to overcome such disparities.

A Community-Engaged Process for Adapting a Proven Community Health Worker Model to Integrate Precision Cancer Care Delivery for Low-income Latinx Adults With Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Disparities in precision cancer care delivery among low-income Latinx adults are well described. In prior work, we developed a community health worker-led goals of care and cancer symptom assessment intervention. The objective of this study was to adapt this intervention for a community setting, incorporating precision cancer care delivery.

METHODS

We used a two-phased systematic approach to adapt an evidence-based intervention for our community. Specifically, we used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to identify barriers and facilitators to precision cancer care delivery via 1-hr interviews with Latinx adults with cancer, Latinx caregivers, community leaders, primary care and oncology clinicians, and community health workers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method and grounded theory analysis. Phase 2 involved interviews with key community advisors using the Expert Panels Method to decide on final adaptations.

RESULTS

Using this community-engaged approach, we identified specific intervention adaptations to ensure precision cancer care delivery in a community setting, which included: (a) expansion of the intervention inclusion criteria and mode of delivery; (b) integration of low-literacy precision cancer care intervention activities in Spanish in collaboration with community-based organizations; (c) ensuring goals reflective of patient and community priorities.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic and community-engaged approach to adapt an intervention for use in delivering precision cancer care strengthened an evidence-based approach to promote the needs and preferences of patients and key community stakeholders.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation for sickle cell disease: updates and future directions

Excellent outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from HLA-identical siblings, improvements in conditioning regimens, novel graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, and the availability of alternative donors have all contributed to the increased applicability and acceptability of HCT for sickle cell disease (SCD). In young children with symptomatic SCD with an available HLA-identical related donor, HCT should be carefully considered. HCT from alternative donors is typically undertaken only in patients with severe symptoms, causing or likely to cause organ damage, and in the context of clinical trials. Patients undergoing HCT for SCD require careful counseling and preparation. They require careful monitoring of unique organ toxicities and complications during HCT. Patients must be prospectively followed for a prolonged time to determine the long-term outcomes and late effects of HCT for SCD. Thus, there is a need for a universal, longitudinal clinical registry to follow patients after HCT for SCD in conjunction with individuals who do not receive HCT to compare outcomes. Antibody-based conditioning and ex-vivo umbilical cord blood expansion are likely to improve the availability and acceptability of HCT. In addition, new disease-modifying drugs and the emerging option of the autologous transplantation of gene-modified hematopoietic progenitor cells are likely to expand the available therapeutic options and make decision-making by patients, physicians, and caregivers even more complicated. Future efforts must also focus on determining the impact of socioeconomic status on access to and outcomes of HCT and the long-term impact of HCT on patients, families, and society.

Since everyone has a donor, why are some eligible patients still not transplanted?

Hematopoietic cell transplantation is an important treatment option for malignant and non-malignant hematologic diseases. Despite increasing the potential donor pool for hematopoietic cell transplantation there are many patients who are unable to access this treatment. There are several biologic and non-biologic factors that may explain lower utilization of transplantation. Biologic factors associated with lower utilization include older age, multiple comorbidities, persons of African American descent and high-risk disease that may not respond optimally to hematopoietic cell transplantation. Non-biologic factors associated with lower utilization include lower educational (without a high school diploma) or social status, uninsured, Medicaid or Medicare insurance and in persons aged ≥60 years, when the distance between their residence and hospital was greater than 37 miles. The decision to proceed to hematopoietic cell transplantation is a dialogue between the patient and the treating physician. While some patients may be considered poor candidates for continued treatment including hematopoietic cell transplantation others may be offered novel pharmacologic and cellular therapies with a capacity to deliver specific immunologic antitumor responses. Pharmacologic and cellular therapies are relatively recent, and it is not known whether the biologic and non-biologic factors that limit access to transplantation will limit access to these newer treatments.

Racial and ethnic enrollment disparities and demographic reporting requirements in acute leukemia clinical trials

Public demographic reporting for acute leukemia trials is inadequate, and NH-White subjects are more likely to be enrolled.

Larger racial-ethnic enrollment disparities were documented after federal reporting requirements, which may be from more data transparency.

Data regarding racial and ethnic enrollment diversity for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) clinical trials in the United States are limited, and little is known about the effect of federal reporting requirements instituted in the late 2000s. We examined demographic data reporting and enrollment diversity for ALL and AML trials in the United States from 2002 to 2017, as well as changes in reporting and diversity after reporting requirements were instituted. Of 223 AML trials and 97 ALL trials with results on ClinicalTrials.gov, 68 (30.5%) and 51 (52.6%) reported enrollment by both race and ethnicity. Among trials that reported race and ethnicity (AML, n = 6554; ALL, n = 4149), non-Hispanic (NH)-Black, NH-Native American, NH-Asian, and Hispanic patients had significantly lower enrollment compared with NH-White patients after adjusting for race-ethnic disease incidence (AML odds ratio, 0.68, 0.31, 0.75, and 0.83, respectively; ALL odds ratio, 0.74, 0.27, 0.67, and 0.64; all, P ≤ .01). The proportion of trials reporting race increased significantly after implementation of the reporting requirements (44.2% to 60.2%; P = .02), but race-ethnicity reporting did not (34.8% to 38.6%; P = .57). Reporting proportions according to number of patients enrolled increased significantly after the reporting requirements were instituted (race, 51.7% to 72.7%; race-ethnicity, 39.5% to 45.4%; both, P < .001), and relative enrollment of NH-Black and Hispanic patients decreased (AML odds ratio, 0.79 and 0.77; ALL odds ratio, 0.35 and 0.25; both P ≤ .01). These data suggest that demographic enrollment reporting for acute leukemia trials is suboptimal, changes in diversity after the reporting requirements may be due to additional enrollment disparities that were previously unreported, and enrollment diversification strategies specific to acute leukemia care delivery are needed.

Practice Patterns and Real-Life Outcomes for Patients with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia in the United States

14% of newly diagnosed APL patients in the Vizient Clinical Data Base died during initial admission or were discharged to hospice.

Adverse outcomes were lower with guideline-concordant treatment, low-risk disease, higher hospital AML volume, and younger age.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is associated with a favorable long-term prognosis if appropriate treatment is initiated promptly. Outcomes in clinical trials and population-based registries vary; potential explanations include a delay in treatment and lower adherence to guideline-recommended therapy in real-world practice. We used the Vizient Clinical Data Base to describe demographic characteristics, baseline clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns in patients newly diagnosed with APL during the study period of April 2017 to March 2020. Baseline white blood cell count was used to assign risk status and assess treatment concordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Logistic regression models examined adjusted associations between patient, hospital, disease characteristics, and adverse outcomes (in-hospital death or discharge to hospice). Among 1464 patients with APL, 205 (14.0%) experienced an adverse outcome. A substantial subset (20.6%) of patients did not receive guideline-concordant regimens. Odds of adverse outcomes increased with failure to receive guideline-concordant treatment (odds ratio [OR], 2.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-3.75; P = .001), high-risk disease (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.53-4.00; P < .001), and increasing age (≥60 years: OR, 11.13; 95% CI, 4.55-27.22; P < .001). Higher hospital acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patient volume was associated with lower odds of adverse outcome (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.99 [for ≤50 vs >200 AML patients per year]; P = .046). In conclusion, in this large database analysis, 14.0% of patients newly diagnosed with APL died or were discharged to hospice. A substantial proportion of patients did not receive guideline-concordant therapy, potentially contributing to adverse outcomes.

Health Disparities: Impact of Health Disparities and Treatment Decision-Making Biases on Cancer Adverse Effects Among Black Cancer Survivors

BACKGROUND

Health disparities affect cancer incidence, treatment decisions, and adverse effects. Oncology providers may hold biases in the decision-making process, which can perpetuate health disparities.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this article is to describe health disparities across treatment decisions and adverse effects, describe decision-making biases, and provide suggestions for nurses to mitigate adverse outcomes.

METHODS

A scoping review of the literature was conducted.

FINDINGS

Factors affecting health disparities stem, in part, from structural racism and decision-making biases, such as implicit bias, which occurs when individuals have unconscious negative thoughts or feelings toward a particular group. Other decision-making biases, seemingly unrelated to race, include default bias, delay discounting bias, and availability bias. Nurses and nurse navigators can mitigate health disparities by providing culturally appropriate care, assessing health literacy, providing education regarding adverse effects, serving as patient advocates, empowering patients, evaluating personal level of disease knowledge, and monitoring and managing cancer treatment adverse effects.

The Pursuit of Health Equity and Equality in Urologic Oncology: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going

CONTEXT

Advances in urologic oncology have improved early detection, treatment options, and health outcomes; however, racial/ethnic minorities continue to experience disparities in cancer incidence and survival. Research evaluating the optimal methods for closing these disparity gaps is under-reported.

OBJECTIVE

To highlight critical disparities in equity and equality in urologic oncology and identify ways in which health care professionals can reduce these disparities among disproportionately affected groups through a health equity-focused framework.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature search was performed using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed. Articles were included if they were published in English from 1980 to 2021 and addressed barriers and health care disparities in urologic cancer care in racial/ethnic minorities. The same search was conducted to look at barriers and disparities according to gender and to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, intersex, or asexual (LGBTQIA) identity, and among immigrant populations.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Racial/ethnic minorities in the USA are less likely to be screened for urologic cancers, are less likely to have an early diagnosis of cancer, and have a higher mortality rate than their white counterparts. In addition, major European and North American clinical trials lack proper representation of diverse populations, leading to a knowledge gap regarding effective methods for addressing cancer health disparities.

CONCLUSIONS

Continued medical advances have increased the efficacy of screening, diagnosis, and treatment of urologic cancers, but there remain significant well-documented disparities in the receipt of these advances among racial/ethnic minorities, women, LGBTQIA individuals, and immigrant populations. Multidisciplinary efforts are needed to address and ultimately eliminate these gaps.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We analyzed several studies to understand current disparities in cancer screening, diagnosis, and health outcomes across under-represented populations. We found that under-represented populations have worse outcomes than their white counterparts diagnosed with cancer. We conclude that the best way to address these disparities is through a multidisciplinary approach that involves engagement at the individual, community, research, and institutional levels to provide the best care possible to each individual patient.

Patterns of undertreatment among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): considerations for patients eligible for non-intensive chemotherapy (NIC)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a life-threatening malignancy that is more prevalent in the elderly. Because the patient population is heterogenous and advanced in age, choosing the optimal therapy can be challenging. There is strong evidence supporting antileukemic therapy, including standard intensive induction chemotherapy (IC) and non-intensive chemotherapy (NIC), for older patients with AML, and guidelines recommend treatment selection based on a patient’s individual and disease characteristics as opposed to age alone. Nonetheless, historic evidence indicates that a high proportion of patients who may be candidates for NIC receive no active antileukemic treatment (NAAT), instead receiving only best supportive care (BSC). We conducted a focused literature review to assess current real-world patterns of undertreatment in AML. From a total of 25 identified studies reporting the proportion of patients with AML receiving NAAT, the proportion of patients treated with NAAT varied widely, ranging from 10 to 61.4% in the US and 24.1 to 35% in Europe. Characteristics associated with receipt of NAAT included clinical factors such as age, poor performance status, comorbidities, and uncontrolled concomitant conditions, as well as sociodemographic factors such as female sex, unmarried status, and lower income. Survival was diminished among patients receiving NAAT, with reported median overall survival values ranging from 1.2 to 4.8 months compared to 5 to 14.4 months with NIC. These findings suggest a proportion of patients who are candidates for NIC receive NAAT, potentially forfeiting the survival benefit of active antileukemic treatment.

Frontline treatment patterns and outcomes among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A population-based analysis in the modern era

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, conventional induction chemotherapy has been the primary frontline treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, older adults are often poor chemotherapy candidates. Recently, several nonconventional frontline AML regimens, including hypomethylating agents, the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax, and targeted therapies, have emerged, and they may offer new options for older adults. This study was aimed at describing treatment patterns and outcomes of older adult AML in a modern population-based cohort.

METHODS

This study evaluated patients aged ≥60 years with a first primary diagnosis of AML (2014-2017) in the California Cancer Registry linked to inpatient hospitalizations. Multivariable regression examined factors associated with the frontline treatment regimen and survival.

RESULTS

In all, 3068 patients were included; 36% received frontline therapy with a conventional chemotherapy backbone, 42% received nonconventional therapy, and 22% received no treatment. The use of nonconventional therapy increased over time from 38% of patients in 2014 to 47% in 2017 (P < .001). In multivariable analyses, receipt of treatment was associated with an age younger than 80 years, fewer than 2 comorbidities, and care at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center (NCI-CC). Compared with conventional chemotherapy, nonconventional therapy was associated with Black race/ethnicity, public health insurance, fewer hospital admissions, and fewer inpatient days. Receiving frontline therapy at an NCI-CC was independently associated with superior overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a population-based approach, this study has demonstrated that patterns of care for frontline AML treatment in older adults are changing, with increasing use of nonconventional therapies. A significant proportion of older adults remain untreated. At the population level, there remain opportunities to increase therapy access for older adults with AML.

Ethnic differences in acute promyelocytic leukaemia between New Zealand Polynesian and European patients

Ethnic differences in haematologic malignancies remain poorly elucidated, hence research in this area is important. This was a retrospective study into potential ethnic disparity in the presentation and outcomes of acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) between New Zealand (NZ) Polynesian and European patients. Data were analysed for patients treated at Auckland City Hospital (ACH; n = 55) and recorded in the New Zealand Cancer Registry (NZCR; n = 173), both for the period 2000-2017. We found that Polynesian patients treated at ACH presented at a younger age than European (P = 0.005), showed higher blast counts (P = 0.033), and a marginally higher prothrombin ratio (P = 0.02). Treatment with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) was started faster in Polynesian patients than European (P = 0.021), suggesting Polynesians were sicker at presentation but were managed accordingly. There were no differences in bleeding events, transfusion requirements and early deaths during the first month of treatment. Long-term survival was also similar. Data extracted from the NZCR confirmed NZ Polynesian patients with APL were younger than European (P < 0.001), but long-term survival was similar (P = 0.920). In summary, this study indicates a discrepancy in the presentation and severity of APL between NZ Polynesian and European patients but treatment initiation was rapid with no difference in outcomes. The distinctive features of APL in NZ Polynesians raise the possibility of a predisposing genetic factor or a different risk factor profile, elucidation of which is important for all patients with APL.

Etiology of Acute Leukemia: A Review

Simple Summary

Acute leukemias are some of the most common cancers affecting all age groups. Despite a significant improvement made in the treatment of acute leukemias, their cause remains unknown. A number of genetic and environmental factors for the development of acute leukemias have been proposed, but none have been proven. Undoubtedly, genetics have a major role in the development of these diseases. The effects of a variety of environmental factors, occupations and hobbies have been explored. A recent “two-hit” theory” for the development of acute lymphoblastic leukemia has been proposed. This combines genetic factors and exposure to infections for the development of this disease. Several genetic factors are suggested. Most recently, for the infection portion, exposure to a virus containing Aspergillus Flavus has been proposed. This review summarizes what is currently known about the factors that are proposed for the development of acute leukemias.

Abstract

Acute leukemias constitute some of the most common malignant disorders. Despite significant progress made in the treatment of these disorders, their etiology remains unknown. A large and diverse group of genetic and environmental variables have been proposed. The role of a variety of factors, including pre-existing and acquired genetic mutations, exposure to radiation and various chemicals during preconception, pregnancy and throughout life, have been explored. The effects of inherited genetic variations and disorders, pre-existing diseases, infectious agents, hobbies, occupations, prior treatments, and a host of other factors have been proposed, but none is universally applicable to all cases. Variation in the incidence and prognosis based on the age, sex, race, type of the disease, geographic area of residence and other factors are intriguing but remain unexplained. Advances in genomic profiling, including genome-wide gene expression, DNA copy number and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype, may shed some light on the role of genetics in these disparities. Separate two-hit hypotheses for the development of acute myeloblastic and lymphoblastic leukemia have been proposed. The latter combines genetics and infection factors resulting in leukemogenesis. A number of pre- and post-natal environmental conditions and exposure to infections, including a mycovirus infected Aspergillus flavus, have been suggested. The exact nature, timing, sequence of the events and mechanisms resulting in the occurrence of leukemia requires further investigations. This review summarizes some of the above factors in acute lymphoblastic and myeloblastic leukemias and the direction for future research on the etiology of these disorders.

Age and remission induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: An analysis of data from the Korean acute myeloid leukemia registry

Objective

The clinical characteristics and therapeutic strategy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are influenced by patients’ age. We evaluated the impact of age on remission induction therapy for AML.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 3,011 adult AML patients identified from a nationwide database between January 2007 and December 2011.

Results

Three hundred twenty-nine (10.9%) acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and 2,682 (89.1%) non-APL patients were analyzed. The median age was 51 years and 55% of patients were male. Six hundred twenty-three patients (21%) were at favorable risk, 1522 (51%) were at intermediate risk, and 743 (25%) were at poor risk. As the age increased, the proportion of those at favorable risk and who received induction chemotherapy decreased. After induction therapy, complete response (CR) was achieved in 81.5% (243/298) of APL and 62.4% (1,409/2,258) of non-APL patients; these rates decreased as the age increased, with an obvious decrement in those older than 60 years. The median overall survival of non-APL patients was 18.7 months, while that of APL patients was not reached, with a 75% five-year survival rate.

Conclusions

Age impacts both the biology and clinical outcomes of AML patients. Further studies should confirm the role of induction remission chemotherapy by age group.

Association of Factors Influencing Selection of Upfront Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation versus Nontransplantation Therapies in Myelofibrosis

Despite the curative potential of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for myelofibrosis (MF), a significant number of patients with MF do not undergo HCT. Factors influencing treatment preferences in these patients have not been well studied. This study was conducted to identify patient-, disease-, and donor-related factors influencing the decision regarding HCT in patients with MF. A secondary objective was to compare survival between patients who elected upfront HCT and those who opted for nontransplantation therapy. We conducted a retrospective chart review amongst patients meeting criteria for transplant indication, evaluating clinical characteristics, treatment preferences, and outcomes. Of the 183 study eligible patients age <70 years, 129 (70%) developed an HCT indication. Age >60 years was significantly associated with higher rates of HLA-typing refusal (13 of 72 versus 1 of 44; P = .02). Caucasian ethnicity was significantly associated with an increased rate of identifying well-matched donors compared with non-Caucasian ethnicity (75% versus 48%; P = .02). Of the 69 patients with well-matched donors, 34 (49%) preferred to not pursue upfront HCT despite an indication for transplantation. Patient preference for nontransplantation therapies was the most common reason for declining HCT. We did not find any difference in survival between patients pursuing upfront HCT and those opting for nontransplantation therapies, although more patients in the HCT arm were in remission at the last follow-up. Patients of Caucasian ethnicity were significantly more likely than non-Caucasian patients to identify a well-matched donor. Despite availability of a well-matched donor, a significant proportion of MF patients with an indication for transplantation do not pursue HCT. Patient age, donor type, and patient preference play major roles in the selection of upfront HCT. Although a survival difference was not observed between upfront HCT versus non-transplant therapy, more patients in the HCT arm were in remission at the last follow-up.

Poorer Clinical Outcomes for Black Patients with AML: A Wake-Up Call for Better Data and Greater Understanding of Cancer Outcomes in All Ethnic Groups

In this issue of Cancer Discovery, Bhatnagar and colleagues show that Black patients in the United States with acute myeloid leukemia have a shorter survival compared with white patients. This is an important paper as it addresses an under researched issue: the complex interaction of race, tumor genetics, socioeconomic factors, and access to treatment in defining treatment outcomes for a devastating cancer.See related article by Bhatnagar et al., p. 626.

Understanding and Addressing Disparities in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies: Approaches for Clinicians

Approximately 185,840 individuals will be diagnosed with hematologic malignancies in the United States in 2020. Disparities in disease incidence, prevalence, burden, mortality, and survivorship have been identified among this patient population. Contributing factors include genetic ancestry, race/ethnicity, sex, socioeconomic status, and geographic region. Historically, these inequities have been understudied. Addressing these disparities requires a systems-level approach, improving access to care and reducing biases in the clinical setting. Additional research is needed to construct comprehensive, multilevel models to explore systematic observational studies and perform strategic intervention trials to overcome these disparities.

Poor Survival and Differential Impact of Genetic Features of Black Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with cytogenetic and molecular factors and patient demographics (e.g., age and race). We compared survival of 25,523 non-Hispanic Black and White adults with AML using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program data and performed mutational profiling of 1,339 patients with AML treated on frontline Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance) protocols. Black patients had shorter survival than White patients, both in SEER and in the setting of Alliance clinical trials. The disparity was especially pronounced in Black patients <60 years, after adjustment for socioeconomic (SEER) and molecular (Alliance) factors. Black race was an independent prognosticator of poor survival. Gene mutation profiles showed fewer NPM1 and more IDH2 mutations in younger Black patients. Overall survival of younger Black patients was adversely affected by IDH2 mutations and FLT3-ITD, but, in contrast to White patients, was not improved by NPM1 mutations. SIGNIFICANCE: We show that young Black patients have not benefited as much as White patients from recent progress in AML treatment in the United States. Our data suggest that both socioeconomic factors and differences in disease biology contribute to the survival disparity and need to be urgently addressed.See related commentary by Vyas, p. 540.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 521.

Cancer Disparities and Health Equity: A Policy Statement From the American Society of Clinical Oncology

ASCO strives, through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality of patient care, to create a world where cancer is prevented and every survivor is healthy. In this pursuit, cancer health equity remains the guiding institutional principle that applies to all its activities across the cancer care continuum. In 2009, ASCO committed to addressing differences in cancer outcomes in its original policy statement on cancer disparities. Over the past decade, despite novel diagnostics and therapeutics, together with changes in the cancer care delivery system such as passage of the Affordable Care Act, cancer disparities persist. Our understanding of the populations experiencing disparate outcomes has likewise expanded to include the intersections of race/ethnicity, geography, sexual orientation and gender identity, sociodemographic factors, and others. This updated statement is intended to guide ASCO's future activities and strategies to achieve its mission of conquering cancer for all populations. ASCO acknowledges that much work remains to be done, by all cancer stakeholders at the systems level, to overcome historical momentum and existing social structures responsible for disparate cancer outcomes. This updated statement affirms ASCO's commitment to moving beyond descriptions of differences in cancer outcomes toward achievement of cancer health equity, with a focus on improving equitable access to care, improving clinical research, addressing structural barriers, and increasing awareness that results in measurable and timely action toward achieving cancer health equity for all.

Barriers to Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review with a Focus on Age

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an effective treatment for many hematologic malignancies, and its utilization continues to rise. However, due to the difficult logistics and high cost of HCT, there are significant barriers to accessing the procedure; these barriers are likely greater for older patients. Although numerous factors may influence HCT access, no formal analysis has detailed the cumulative barriers that have been studied thus far. We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to better categorize the barriers to access and referral to HCT, with a focus on the subgroup of older patients. We searched for articles published in English from PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials between the database inception and January 31, 2020. We selected articles that met the following inclusion criteria: (1) study design: qualitative, cross-sectional, observational cohort, or mixed-method study designs; (2) outcomes: barriers related to patient and physician access to HCT; and (3) population: adults aged ≥18 years with hematologic malignancies within the United States. Abstracts without full text were excluded. QUALSYST methodology was used to determine article quality. Data on the barriers to access and referral for HCT were extracted, along with other study characteristics. We summarized the findings using descriptive statistics. We included 26 of 3859 studies screened for inclusion criteria. Twenty studies were retrospective cohorts and 4 were cross-sectional. There was 1 prospective cohort study and 1 mixed-method study. Only 1 study was rated as high quality, and 16 were rated as fair. Seventeen studies analyzed age as a potential barrier to HCT referral and access, with 16 finding older age to be a barrier. Other consistent barriers to HCT referral and access included nonwhite race (n = 16/20 studies), insurance status (n = 13/14 studies), comorbidities (n = 10/11 studies), and lower socioeconomic status (n = 7/8 studies). High-quality studies are lacking related to HCT barriers. Older age and nonwhite race were consistently linked to reduced access to HCT. To produce a more just health care system, strategies to overcome these barriers for vulnerable populations should be prioritized. Examples include patient and physician education, as well as geriatric assessment guided care models that can be readily incorporated into clinical practice.

A Community-Partnered, Evidence-Based Approach to Improving Cancer Care Delivery for Low-Income and Minority Patients with Cancer

Community-engaged adaptations of evidence-based interventions are needed to improve cancer care delivery for low-income and minority populations with cancer. The objective of this study was to adapt an intervention to improve end-of-life cancer care delivery using a community-partnered approach. We used a two-step formative research process to adapt the evidence-based lay health workers educate engage and encourage patients to share (LEAPS) cancer care intervention. The first step involved obtaining a series of adaptations through focus groups with 15 patients, 12 caregivers, and 6 leaders and staff of the Unite Here Health (UHH) payer organization, and 12 primary care and oncology care providers. Focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. The second step involved finalization of adaptations from a community advisory board comprised of 4 patients, 2 caregivers, 4 oncology providers, 2 lay health workers and 4 UHH healthcare payer staff and executive leaders. Using this community-engaged approach, stakeholders identified critical barriers and solutions to intervention delivery which included: (1) expanding the intervention to ensure patient recruitment; (2) including caregivers; (3) regular communication between UHH staff, primary care and oncology providers; and (4) selecting outcomes that reflect patient-reported quality of life. This systematic and community-partnered approach to adapt an end-of-life cancer care intervention strengthened this existing intervention to promote the needs and preferences of patients, caregivers, providers, and healthcare payer leaders. This approach can be used to address cancer care delivery for low-income and minority patients with cancer.

The global burden and attributable risk factor analysis of acute myeloid leukemia in 195 countries and territories from 1990 to 2017: estimates based on the global burden of disease study 2017

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a common leukemia subtype and has a poor prognosis. The risk of AML is highly related to age. In the context of population aging, a comprehensive report presenting epidemiological trends of AML is evaluable for policy-marker to allocate healthy resources.

METHODS

This study was based on the Global Burden of Disease 2017 database. We analyzed the change trends of incidence rate, death rate, and disability-adjusted life year (DALY) rate by calculating the corresponding estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) values. Besides, we investigated the influence of social development degree on AML's epidemiological trends and potential risk factors for AML-related mortality.

RESULTS

From 1990 to 2017, the incidence of AML gradually increased in the globe. Males and elder people had a higher possibility to develop AML. Developed countries tended to have higher age-standardized incidence rate and death rate than developing regions. Smoking, high body mass index, occupational exposure to benzene, and formaldehyde were the main risk factors for AML-related mortality. Notably, the contribution ratio of exposure to carcinogens was significantly increased in the low social-demographic index (SDI) region than in the high SDI region.

CONCLUSION

Generally, the burden of AML became heavier during the past 28 years which might need more health resources to resolve this population aging-associated problem. In the present stage, developed countries with high SDI had the most AML incidences and deaths. At the same time, developing countries with middle- or low-middle SDI also need to take actions to relieve rapidly increased AML burden.

Epidemiology and Etiology of Leukemia and Lymphoma

Available evidence suggests that the incidence of leukemia and lymphoma tends to be higher in highly developed regions of the world and among Whites in the United States. Temporal trends in incidence are dynamic and multifactorial; for instance, the incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma increased around the turn of the century, in part because of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic. Most leukemias and lymphomas are sporadic and the specific etiology remains elusive. Still, research shows that these malignancies often develop in the context of genetic abnormalities, immunosuppression, and exposure to risk factors like ionizing radiation, carcinogenic chemicals, and oncogenic viruses. The prognosis varies by subtype, with poorer survival outcomes for acute leukemias among adults, and more favorable outcomes for Hodgkin's lymphoma. At a time when specific prevention efforts targeting these malignancies are nonexistent, there is a great need to ensure equitable access to diagnostic services and treatments worldwide.

A randomized trial of a multi-level intervention to improve advance care planning and symptom management among low-income and minority employees diagnosed with cancer in outpatient community settings

INTRODUCTION

Equitable delivery of advance care planning and symptom management among patients is crucial to improving cancer care. Existing interventions to improve the uptake of these services have predominantly occurred in clinic settings and are limited in their effectiveness, particularly among low-income and minority populations.

METHODS

The "Lay health worker Educates Engages and Activates Patients to Share (LEAPS)" intervention was developed to improve advance care planning and symptom management among low-income and minority hourly-wage workers with cancer, in two community settings. The intervention provides a lay health worker to all patients newly diagnosed with cancer and aims to educate and activate patients to engage in advance care planning and symptom management with their oncology providers. In this randomized clinical trial, we will evaluate the effect on quality of life (primary outcome) using the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey, at enrollment, 4- and 12- months post-enrollment. We will examine between-group differences on our secondary outcomes of patient activation, patient satisfaction with healthcare decision-making, and symptom burden (at enrollment, 4- and 12-months post-enrollment), and total healthcare use and healthcare costs (at 12-months post-enrollment).

DISCUSSION

Multilevel approaches are urgently needed to improve cancer care delivery among low-income and minority patients diagnosed with cancer in community settings. The current study describes the LEAPS intervention, the study design, and baseline characteristics of the community centers participating in the study. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration #NCT03699748.

Bias and stereotyping among research and clinical professionals: Perspectives on minority recruitment for oncology clinical trials

BACKGROUND

In recent years, extensive attention has been paid to the possibility that bias among health care professionals contributes to health disparities. In its 2003 report, the Institute of Medicine concluded that bias against racial minorities may affect communication or care offered. However, to the authors' knowledge, the role of bias within the context of recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities to cancer clinical trials has not been explored to date. Therefore, the authors assessed the experiences of clinical and research personnel related to factors influencing the recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities for cancer clinical trials.

METHODS

A total of 91 qualitative interviews were conducted at 5 US cancer centers among 4 stakeholder groups: 1) cancer center leaders; 2) principal investigators; 3) referring clinicians; and 4) research staff. Data analysis was conducted using a content analysis approach to generate themes from the transcribed interviews.

RESULTS

Five prominent themes emerged: 1) recruitment interactions with potential minority participants were perceived to be challenging; 2) potential minority participants were not perceived to be ideal study candidates; 3) a combination of clinic-level barriers and negative perceptions of minority study participants led to providers withholding clinical trial opportunities from potential minority participants; 4) when clinical trial recruitment practices were tailored to minority patients, addressing research misconceptions to build trust was a common strategy; 5) for some respondents, race was perceived as irrelevant when screening and recruiting potential minority participants for clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only did some respondents view racial and ethnic minorities as less promising participants, some respondents reported withholding trial opportunities from minorities based on these perceptions. Some providers endorsed using tailored recruitment strategies whereas others eschewed race as a factor in trial recruitment. The presence of bias and stereotyping among clinical and research professionals recruiting for cancer clinical trials should be considered when designing interventions to increase minority enrollment.

Are social inequalities in acute myeloid leukemia survival explained by differences in treatment utilization? Results from a French longitudinal observational study among older patients

Background

Evidences support social inequalities in cancer survival. Studies on hematological malignancies, and more specifically Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), are sparser. Our study assessed: 1/ the influence of patients’ socioeconomic position on survival, 2/ the role of treatment in this relationship, and 3/ the influence of patients’ socioeconomic position on treatment utilization.

Methods

This prospective multicenter study includes all patients aged 60 and older, newly diagnosed with AML, excluding promyelocytic subtypes, between 1st January 2009 to 31st December 2014 in the South-West of France. Data came from medical files. Patients’ socioeconomic position was measured by an ecological deprivation index, the European Deprivation Index. We studied first, patients’ socioeconomic position influence on overall survival (n = 592), second, on the use of intensive chemotherapy (n = 592), and third, on the use of low intensive treatment versus best supportive care among patients judged unfit for intensive chemotherapy (n = 405).

Results

We found an influence of patients’ socioeconomic position on survival (highest versus lowest position HR_Q5: 1.39 [1.05;1.87] that was downsized to become no more significant after adjustment for AML ontogeny (HR_Q5: 1.31[0.97;1.76] and cytogenetic prognosis HR_Q5: 1.30[0.97;1.75]). The treatment was strongly associated with survival. A lower proportion of intensive chemotherapy was observed among patients with lowest socioeconomic position (OR_Q5: 0.41[0.19;0.90]) which did not persist after adjustment for AML ontogeny (OR_Q5: 0.59[0.25;1.40]). No such influence of patients’ socioeconomic position was found on the treatment allocation among patients judged unfit for intensive chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Finally, these results suggest an indirect influence of patients’ socioeconomic position on survival through AML initial presentation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-6093-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Temporal patterns and predictors of receiving no active treatment among older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in the United States: A population-level analysis

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are aged >65 years at the time of diagnosis and are not actively treated. The objective of the current study was to determine the prevalence, temporal trends, and factors associated with no active treatment (NAT) among older patients with AML in the United States.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 14,089 patients with AML residing in the United States who were diagnosed with AML at age ≥66 years during 2001 through 2013. NAT was defined as not receiving any chemotherapy, including hypomethylating agents. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze sociodemographic, clinical, and provider characteristics associated with NAT.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with NAT decreased over time from 59.7% among patients diagnosed in 2001 to 42.8% among those diagnosed in 2013. The median overall survival for the entire cohort was 82 days from the time of diagnosis. Patients treated with NAT had worse survival compared with those receiving active treatment. Variables found to be associated with higher odds of NAT included older age, certain sociodemographic characteristics (household income within the lowest quartile, residence outside the Northeast region of the United States, and being unmarried), and clinical factors (≥3 comorbidities, the presence of mental disorders, recent hospitalization, and disability).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater than one-half of older patients with AML residing in the United States do not receive any active leukemia-directed therapy despite the availability of lower intensity therapies such as hypomethylating agents. Lack of active therapy receipt is associated with inferior survival. Identifying predictors of NAT might improve the quality of care and survival in this patient population, especially as novel therapeutic options with lower toxicity are becoming available.

The Epidemiological Trend of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Childhood: a Population-Based Analysis

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the fifth most common malignancy in children, and the prognosis for AML in children remains relatively poor. However, its incidence and survival trends based on a large sample size have not been reported.

Children diagnosed with AML between 1975 and 2014 were accessed from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Incidence and survival trends were evaluated by age-adjusted incidence and relative survival rates (RSRs) and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Cox regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for child AML death.

The overall incidence of AML in childhood increased each decade between 1975 and 2014, with the total age-adjusted incidence increasing from 5.766 to 6.615 to 7.478 to 7.607 per 1,000,000 persons. In addition, the relative survival rates of AML in childhood improved significantly, with 5-year RSRs increasing from 22.40% to 39.60% to 55.50% to 68.30% over the past four decades (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, survival disparities among different races and socioeconomic statuses have continued to widen over the past four decades. Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed a higher risk of death in Black patients (HR = 1.245, 95% CI: 1.077-1.438, p = 0.003) with Whites as a reference.

These results may help predict future trends for AML in childhood, better design clinical trials by eliminating disparities, and ultimately improve clinical management and outcome.

Social Determinants of Appropriate Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities in guideline-based, appropriate treatment (ApT) may be a significant driving force for differences in survival for people with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We hypothesize that receipt of ApT is influenced by factors such as race and socioeconomic status, irrespective of neighborhood-level differences in healthcare, variations in practice patterns, and clinical characteristics of patients with nonmetastatic MIBC.

METHODS

Within the National Cancer Database, we identified individuals diagnosed with MIBC between 2004 and 2013. Multivariable logistic regression and mixed effects modelling was used to examine predictors of ApT, clustered within institutions.

RESULTS

A total of 51,350 individuals had clinically staged nonmetastatic, lymph node-negative MIBC. Black individuals comprised 6.4% of the cohort. Mean age was 72.6 years (SD 11.6) with a male predominance (71.4%). Less than half received ApT (42.6%). Fewer black individuals received ApT compared with white individuals (37% vs. 43%, P < 0.001). When clustered by institution, the odds of ApT were 21% lower for black individuals [odds ratio (OR), 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.87] compared with white individuals with nonmetastatic MIBC. When restricted to higher volume centers with more diverse populations, black individuals had 25% lower odds of ApT (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.91; P < 0.01), compared with white counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparities in treatment persisted after accounting for various clinical factors and social determinants of health. Future efforts should focus on addressing racial bias to improve disparities in bladder cancer treatment.

IMPACT

If we are not delivering evidence-based care due to these biases (after accounting for access and biology), then it is expected that patients will experience inferior outcomes.

Epidemiology of acute myeloid leukemia: Recent progress and enduring challenges

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant disorder of the bone marrow which is characterized by the clonal expansion and differentiation arrest of myeloid progenitor cells. The age-adjusted incidence of AML is 4.3 per 100,000 annually in the United States (US). Incidence increases with age with a median age at diagnosis of 68 years in the US. The etiology of AML is heterogeneous. In some patients, prior exposure to therapeutic, occupational or environmental DNA-damaging agents is implicated, but most cases of AML remain without a clear etiology. AML is the most common form of acute leukemia in adults and has the shortest survival (5-year survival = 24%). Curative therapies, including intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation, are generally applicable to a minority of patients who are younger and fit, while most older individuals exhibit poor prognosis and survival. Differences in patient outcomes are influenced by disease characteristics, access to care including active therapies and supportive care, and other factors. After many years without therapeutic advances, several new therapies have been approved and are expected to impact patient outcomes, especially for older patients and those with refractory disease.

Utilization of initial chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in the United States

The use of chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with survival benefits and alleviation of symptoms related to AML. Prior studies have demonstrated a lower receipt of chemotherapy with increasing age and comorbidities. We hypothesized that socioeconomic and health system factors also determine the use of chemotherapy. We included 61 775 adults with AML diagnosed between 2003 and 2011 from the National Cancer Database, and performed a multivariable logistic regression model to determine the association between receipt of chemotherapy and several factors. A total of 15 608 patients (25.3%) did not receive chemotherapy. In a multivariable analysis, the likelihood of getting chemotherapy declined with increasing age and comorbidities and among patients with therapy-related and intermediate-/high-risk AML. Other factors associated with a lower likelihood of receiving chemotherapy included receipt of care in nonacademic centers, African American race, lower income status, uninsured or Medicare insurance status, and female sex. Compared with the previous studies, our study is novel because it provides data from a large, unselected cohort of patients diagnosed in the United States in recent years, and simultaneously examines the effect of various biological, socioeconomic, and health system factors. The results of our study raise a possibility of leukemia care disparity based on socioeconomic and health system factors. Better understanding of ways such factors may influence receipt of chemotherapy may allow an increase in the use of chemotherapy.

Nonverbal synchrony as a behavioural marker of patient and physician race-related attitudes and a predictor of outcomes in oncology interactions: protocol for a secondary analysis of video-recorded cancer treatment discussions

INTRODUCTION

Racial disparities in cancer treatment contribute to racial disparities in mortality rates. The quality of patient-physician communication during clinical interactions with black patients and non-black physicians (racially discordant) is poorer than communication quality with white patients (racially concordant). Patient and physician race-related attitudes affect the quality of this communication. These attitudes are likely expressed through subtle non-verbal behaviours, but prior research has not examined these behaviours. Nonverbal synchrony, the coordination of physical movement, reflects the preinteraction attitudes of participants in interactions and predicts their postinteraction perceptions of and affect towards one another. In this study, peer reviewed and funded by the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (R21MD011766), we will investigate non-verbal synchrony in racially concordant and discordant interactions to better understand racial disparities in clinical communication.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This secondary analysis includes racially concordant (n=163) and racially discordant (n=68) video-recorded oncology interactions, patient and oncologist self-reported race-related attitudes, perceptions of the interaction and observer ratings of physician patient-centred communication and patient and physician affect and rapport. In aim 1, we will assess and compare non-verbal synchrony between physicians and patients in racially concordant and discordant interactions. In aim 2, we will determine the influence of non-verbal synchrony on patient and physician affect and communication. In aim 3, we will examine possible causes (ie, race-related attitudes) and consequences (ie, negative perceptions) of non-verbal synchrony in racially discordant interactions. In aim 4, we will develop and test a mediational model linking physician and patient race-related attitudes to non-verbal synchrony and, in turn, interaction outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The parent and current studies were approved by the Wayne State University Institutional Review Board. Since only archival data will be used, ethical or safety risks are low. We will disseminate our findings to relevant conferences and journals.

An overview of disparities in childhood cancer: Report on the Inaugural Symposium on Childhood Cancer Health Disparities, Houston, Texas, 2016

The Inaugural Symposium on Childhood Cancer Health Disparities was held in Houston, Texas, on November 2, 2016. The symposium was attended by 109 scientists and clinicians from diverse disciplinary backgrounds with interests in pediatric cancer disparities and focused on reviewing our current knowledge of disparities in cancer risk and outcomes for select childhood cancers. Following a full day of topical sessions, everyone participated in a brainstorming session to develop a working strategy for the continued expansion of research in this area. This meeting was designed to serve as a springboard for examination of childhood cancer disparities from a more unified and systematic approach and to enhance awareness of this area of need.

Incidence, Survival, and Risk Factors for Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Not Otherwise Specified and Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Recurrent Genetic Abnormalities: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database, 2001-2013

BACKGROUND/AIM

As the knowledgebase of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has grown, classification systems have moved to incorporate these new findings.

METHODS

We assessed 32,941 patients with AML whose records are contained in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

RESULTS

Half of all patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2013 did not have a World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Acute promyelocytic leukemia and acute panmyelosis with myelofibrosis were associated with the longest leukemia-specific survival (110 and 115 months, respectively), and AML with minimal differentiation and acute megakaryoblastic leukemia with the shortest (30 and 28 months, respectively). For patients in the WHO groups AML not otherwise specified (AML-NOS) and AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities (AML-RGA), the risk of death was greater for older patients and less for married patients. Black patients with any type of AML-NOS also had a higher risk of death. Patients whose case of AML did not receive a WHO classification were older and this group had a higher risk of death when compared to patients with a WHO type of AML-NOS.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the divergent outcomes of patients with AML and the importance of using the WHO classification system and demographic factors to gauge their prognosis.

Racial Differences in Four Leukemia Subtypes: Comprehensive Descriptive Epidemiology

Leukemia is a malignant progressive disease and has four major subtypes. Different racial groups differ significantly in multiple aspects. Our goal is to systematically and comprehensively quantify racial differences in leukemia. The SEER database is analyzed, and comprehensive descriptive analysis is provided for the four major subtypes, namely ALL (acute lymphoblastic leukemia), CLL (chronic lymphoblastic leukemia), AML (acute myeloid leukemia), and CML (chronic myeloid leukemia), and for two age groups (≤14 and >14) separately. The racial groups studied include NHW (non-Hispanic White), HW (Hispanic White), BL (Black), and API (Asian and Pacific Islander). Univariate and multivariate analyses are conducted to quantify racial differences in patients’ characteristics, incidence, and survival. For patients’ characteristics, significant racial differences are observed in gender, age at diagnosis, diagnosis era, using radiation for treatment, registry, cancer history, and histology type. For incidence, significant racial differences are observed, and the patterns vary across subtypes, gender, and age groups. For most of the subtypes and gender and age groups, Blacks have the worst five-year survival, and significant racial differences exist. This study provides a comprehensive epidemiologic description of racial differences for the four major leukemia subtypes in the U.S. population.

Racial and ethnic disparities in hematologic malignancies

Racial and ethnic disparities in patients with solid malignancies have been well documented. Less is known about these disparities in patients with hematologic malignancies. With the advent of novel chemotherapeutics and targeted molecular, cellular, and immunologic therapies, it is important to identify differences in care that may lead to disparate outcomes. This review provides a critical appraisal of the empirical research on racial and ethnic disparities in incidence, survival, and outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies. The review focuses on patients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, myeloproliferative neoplasms, and myelodysplastic syndrome. The review discusses possible causes of racial and ethnic disparities and also considers future directions for studies to help decrease disparities.

Randomized trial of a question prompt list to increase patient active participation during interactions with black patients and their oncologists

OBJECTIVE

Communication during racially-discordant interactions is often of poor quality and may contribute to racial treatment disparities. We evaluated an intervention designed to increase patient active participation and other communication-related outcomes during interactions between Black patients and non-Black oncologists.

METHODS

Participants were 18 non-Black medical oncologists and 114 Black patients at two cancer hospitals in Detroit, Michigan, USA. Before a clinic visit to discuss treatment, patients were randomly assigned to usual care or to one of two question prompt list (QPL) formats: booklet (QPL-Only), or booklet and communication coach (QPL-plus-Coach). Patient-oncologist interactions were video recorded. Patients reported perceptions of the intervention, oncologist communication, role in treatment decisions, and trust in the oncologist. Observers assessed interaction length, patient active participation, and oncologist communication.

RESULTS

The intervention was viewed positively and did not increase interaction length. The QPL-only format increased patient active participation; the QPL-plus-Coach format decreased patient perceptions of oncologist communication. No other significant effects were found.

CONCLUSION

This QPL booklet is acceptable and increases patient active participation in racially-discordant oncology interactions. Future research should investigate whether adding physician-focused interventions might improve other outcomes.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This QPL booklet is acceptable and can improve patient active participation in racially-discordant oncology interactions.