1
|
Bankar A, Alibhai S, Smith E, Yang D, Malik S, Cheung V, Siddiq N, Claudio J, Arruda A, Tsui H, Capo-Chichi JM, Kennedy JA, McNamara C, Sibai H, Maze D, Xu W, Gupta V. Association of frailty with clinical outcomes in myelofibrosis: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Haematol 2021; 194:557-567. [PMID: 34131896 PMCID: PMC8361997 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
There is limited understanding of the impact of frailty on clinical outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). In this retrospective cohort study on 439 chronic phase MF patients [mean age: 68·7 ± 12 years; median follow-up: 3·4 years (IQR 0·4-8·6)] from 2004 till 2018, we used a 35-variable frailty index (FI) to categorise patient's frailty status as fit (FI < 0·2, reference), prefrail (FI 0·2-0·29) or frail (FI ≥ 0·3). The association of frailty with overall survival (OS) and cumulative JAK inhibitor (JAKi) therapy failure was measured using hazard ratio (HR, 95% CI). In multivariable analysis, prefrail (HR 1·7, 1·1-2·5) and frail patients (HR 2·9, 1·6-5·5), those with higher DIPSS score (HR 2·5, 1·6-3·9) and transfusion dependency (HR 1·9, 1·3-2·9) had shorter OS. In a subset analysis of patients on JAKi treatment (n = 222), frail patients (HR 2·5, 1·1-5·7), patients with higher DIPSS score (HR 1·7, 1·0-3·1) and transfusion dependence (HR 1·7, 1·1-2·7) had higher cumulative incidence of JAKi failure. Age, comorbidities, ECOG performance status, and MPN driver mutations did not impact outcomes. Thus, higher frailty scores are associated with worse OS and increased JAKi failure in MF, and is a superior indicator of fitness in comparison to age, comorbidities, and performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniket Bankar
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Elliot Smith
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dongyang Yang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah Malik
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Verna Cheung
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nancy Siddiq
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jaime Claudio
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Arruda
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hubert Tsui
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Hassan Sibai
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dawn Maze
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vikas Gupta
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith E, Huang J, Viswabandya A, Maze D, Malik S, Cheung V, Siddiq N, Claudio J, Arruda A, Kennedy J, Bankar A, Law AD, Lam W, Michelis FV, Kim D, Lipton J, Kumar R, Mattsson J, McNamara C, Sibai H, Xu W, Gupta V. Association of Factors Influencing Selection of Upfront Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation versus Nontransplantation Therapies in Myelofibrosis. Transplant Cell Ther 2021; 27:600.e1-600.e8. [PMID: 33798769 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Despite the curative potential of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for myelofibrosis (MF), a significant number of patients with MF do not undergo HCT. Factors influencing treatment preferences in these patients have not been well studied. This study was conducted to identify patient-, disease-, and donor-related factors influencing the decision regarding HCT in patients with MF. A secondary objective was to compare survival between patients who elected upfront HCT and those who opted for nontransplantation therapy. We conducted a retrospective chart review amongst patients meeting criteria for transplant indication, evaluating clinical characteristics, treatment preferences, and outcomes. Of the 183 study eligible patients age <70 years, 129 (70%) developed an HCT indication. Age >60 years was significantly associated with higher rates of HLA-typing refusal (13 of 72 versus 1 of 44; P = .02). Caucasian ethnicity was significantly associated with an increased rate of identifying well-matched donors compared with non-Caucasian ethnicity (75% versus 48%; P = .02). Of the 69 patients with well-matched donors, 34 (49%) preferred to not pursue upfront HCT despite an indication for transplantation. Patient preference for nontransplantation therapies was the most common reason for declining HCT. We did not find any difference in survival between patients pursuing upfront HCT and those opting for nontransplantation therapies, although more patients in the HCT arm were in remission at the last follow-up. Patients of Caucasian ethnicity were significantly more likely than non-Caucasian patients to identify a well-matched donor. Despite availability of a well-matched donor, a significant proportion of MF patients with an indication for transplantation do not pursue HCT. Patient age, donor type, and patient preference play major roles in the selection of upfront HCT. Although a survival difference was not observed between upfront HCT versus non-transplant therapy, more patients in the HCT arm were in remission at the last follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliot Smith
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jingyue Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Auro Viswabandya
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dawn Maze
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Malik
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Verna Cheung
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy Siddiq
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jaime Claudio
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Arruda
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Kennedy
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aniket Bankar
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Datt Law
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wilson Lam
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fotios V Michelis
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dennis Kim
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Lipton
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rajat Kumar
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonas Mattsson
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caroline McNamara
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hassan Sibai
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vikas Gupta
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lippman SM, Klein EA, Goodman PJ, Lucia MS, Thompson IM, Ford LG, Parnes HL, Minasian LM, Gaziano JM, Hartline JA, Parsons JK, Bearden JD, Crawford ED, Goodman GE, Claudio J, Winquist E, Cook ED, Karp DD, Walther P, Lieber MM, Kristal AR, Darke AK, Arnold KB, Ganz PA, Santella RM, Albanes D, Taylor PR, Probstfield JL, Jagpal TJ, Crowley JJ, Meyskens FL, Baker LH, Coltman CA. Effect of selenium and vitamin E on risk of prostate cancer and other cancers: the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). JAMA 2009; 301:39-51. [PMID: 19066370 PMCID: PMC3682779 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2008.864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1431] [Impact Index Per Article: 95.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Secondary analyses of 2 randomized controlled trials and supportive epidemiologic and preclinical data indicated the potential of selenium and vitamin E for preventing prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE To determine whether selenium, vitamin E, or both could prevent prostate cancer and other diseases with little or no toxicity in relatively healthy men. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized, placebo-controlled trial (Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial [SELECT]) of 35,533 men from 427 participating sites in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico randomly assigned to 4 groups (selenium, vitamin E, selenium + vitamin E, and placebo) in a double-blind fashion between August 22, 2001, and June 24, 2004. Baseline eligibility included age 50 years or older (African American men) or 55 years or older (all other men), a serum prostate-specific antigen level of 4 ng/mL or less, and a digital rectal examination not suspicious for prostate cancer. INTERVENTIONS Oral selenium (200 microg/d from L-selenomethionine) and matched vitamin E placebo, vitamin E (400 IU/d of all rac-alpha-tocopheryl acetate) and matched selenium placebo, selenium + vitamin E, or placebo + placebo for a planned follow-up of minimum of 7 years and a maximum of 12 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Prostate cancer and prespecified secondary outcomes, including lung, colorectal, and overall primary cancer. RESULTS As of October 23, 2008, median overall follow-up was 5.46 years (range, 4.17-7.33 years). Hazard ratios (99% confidence intervals [CIs]) for prostate cancer were 1.13 (99% CI, 0.95-1.35; n = 473) for vitamin E, 1.04 (99% CI, 0.87-1.24; n = 432) for selenium, and 1.05 (99% CI, 0.88-1.25; n = 437) for selenium + vitamin E vs 1.00 (n = 416) for placebo. There were no significant differences (all P>.15) in any other prespecified cancer end points. There were statistically nonsignificant increased risks of prostate cancer in the vitamin E group (P = .06) and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the selenium group (relative risk, 1.07; 99% CI, 0.94-1.22; P = .16) but not in the selenium + vitamin E group. CONCLUSION Selenium or vitamin E, alone or in combination at the doses and formulations used, did not prevent prostate cancer in this population of relatively healthy men. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00006392.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott M Lippman
- Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chang H, Qi XY, Claudio J, Zhuang L, Patterson B, Stewart AK. Analysis of PTEN deletions and mutations in multiple myeloma. Leuk Res 2005; 30:262-5. [PMID: 16112193 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2005] [Revised: 07/10/2005] [Accepted: 07/12/2005] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Clonal plasma cells from patients with multiple myeloma (MM), plasma cell leukemia (PCL) and human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs) were analyzed for deletions/mutations of the tumor suppressor gene PTEN. By interphase-FISH, hemizygous PTEN deletions were detected in 4 (5.6%) of 71 MM patients, 2 (20%) of 10 PCLs, and 2 (20%) of 10 HMCLs. PTEN deletions were detected in 4 MM patients at diagnosis with stage III disease (Durie-Salmon). Of the six cases with PTEN deletions, 1 MM had a 13q deletion, 1 PCL had a t(11;14), and the other PCL had a t(14;16), a 13q deletion and a p53 deletion. Sequencing analysis did not detect PTEN mutations in 11 primary MM and 5 PCL cases. Our results indicate that alterations of PTEN are uncommon in MM patients, and PTEN deletions tend to occur in advanced disease suggesting that they are secondary, rather than primary, events in the pathogenesis of MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Chang
- Department of Laboratory Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ont., Canada M5G 2M9.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To assess the value of precordial percussion in detecting cardiomegaly, and to compare it with palpation of the apical impulse. DESIGN Descriptive study. SETTING Hospitals and clinics of a university medical center. PATIENTS Light indirect percussion of the precordium was performed on 72 inpatients and 28 outpatients. All patients had a posteroanterior radiograph of the chest. Percussors were unaware of the clinical history and of chest roentgenogram results. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Thirty-six patients (36%) had cardiomegaly, defined as a cardiothoracic ratio of greater than 0.5 on chest roentgenogram. The cardiothoracic ratio was significantly correlated with percussion distance from the midsternal line in the left fourth (r = 0.35, p less than 0.0006), fifth (r = 0.65, p less than 0.00001), and sixth (r = 0.40, p less than 0.0001) intercostal spaces. After adjustment for clinical symptoms and systolic and diastolic blood pressures, percussion distance in the left fifth intercostal space remained a significant independent predictor of the cardiothoracic ratio. Percussion distance in the left fifth interspace discriminated cardiomegaly with a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) area of 0.95. Percussion dullness more than 10.5 cm from the midsternal line in the left fifth interspace had a sensitivity of 94.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79.9% to 99.0%) and a specificity of 67.2% (CI, 54.2% to 78.1%). Distance of the apical impulse from the midsternal line discriminated with an ROC area of 0.95, but an impulse was palpated in only 40% of cases. CONCLUSIONS Percussion in the left fifth intercostal space accurately discriminates patients with and without cardiomegaly, and adds information beyond that obtainable from the history and other parts of the physical examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P S Heckerling
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago 60680
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|