1
|
Dong F. Pan-Cancer Molecular Biomarkers: A Paradigm Shift in Diagnostic Pathology. Clin Lab Med 2024; 44:325-337. [PMID: 38821647 DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2023.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
The rapid adoption of next-generation sequencing in clinical oncology has enabled the detection of molecular biomarkers shared between multiple tumor types. These pan-cancer biomarkers include sequence-altering mutations, copy number changes, gene rearrangements, and mutational signatures and have been demonstrated to predict response to targeted therapy. This article reviews issues surrounding current and emerging pan-cancer molecular biomarkers in clinical oncology: technological advances that enable the broad detection of cancer mutations across hundreds of genes, the spectrum of driver and passenger mutations derived from human cancer genomes, and implications for patient care now and in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Dong
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3375 Hillview Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gupta S, Sholl LM, Yang Y, Osunkoya AO, Gordetsky JB, Cornejo KM, Michalova K, Maclean F, Dvindenko E, Snuderl M, Hirsch MS, Anderson WJ, Rowsey RA, Jimenez RE, Cheville JC, Sadow PM, Colecchia M, Ricci C, Ulbright TM, Berney DM, Acosta AM. Genomic analysis of spermatocytic tumors demonstrates recurrent molecular alterations in cases with malignant clinical behavior. J Pathol 2024; 262:50-60. [PMID: 37792634 DOI: 10.1002/path.6210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
Spermatocytic tumor (ST) is a rare type of germ cell tumor that occurs exclusively in the postpubertal testis and typically affects elderly men. Most STs are benign, but rare cases exhibit aggressive clinical behavior, often in association with transition to sarcomatoid histology. Limited molecular analyses have been performed on STs; therefore, their genomic and epigenomic features remain incompletely described. Twenty-seven samples from 25 individual patients were analyzed with a combination of DNA sequencing panels, genomic methylation profiling, SNP array, isochromosome (12p) [i(12p)] FISH, and immunohistochemistry. The series included five metastasizing tumors (three with sarcomatoid transformation, one anaplastic, and one conventional) and 20 non-metastasizing tumors (14 anaplastic and six conventional). Anaplastic tumors comprised a monomorphic population of intermediate-sized neoplastic cells, as previously described. Multiomic analyses demonstrated that there were two genomic subgroups of STs: one with diploid genomes and hotspot RAS/RAF variants and the other with global ploidy shift and absence of recurrent mutations. Relative gain of chromosome 9 was a consistent finding in both subgroups. A comparison of metastasizing and non-metastasizing cases demonstrated that aggressive behavior was associated with the acquisition of pathogenic TP53 mutations and/or relative gains of 12p/i(12p). In cases with sarcomatoid transformation, TP53 mutations seem to underlie the transition to sarcomatoid histology. Genomic methylation analysis demonstrated that aggressive cases with gains of 12p cluster closer to pure seminomas than to STs without gains of 12p. In conclusion, STs include two genomic subgroups, characterized by global ploidy shifts without recurrent mutations and diploid genomes with RAS/RAF hotspot mutations, respectively. Biologic progression was associated with relative gains of 12p and TP53 mutations. The findings in STs with relative gains of 12p suggest that they may exhibit biologic characteristics akin to those seen in germ cell neoplasia in situ-related germ cell tumors rather than non-germ cell neoplasia in situ-derived STs. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sounak Gupta
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lynette M Sholl
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yiying Yang
- Department of Pathology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adeboye O Osunkoya
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Kristine M Cornejo
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Fiona Maclean
- Department of Pathology, Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Eugénia Dvindenko
- Department of Pathology, Instituto Português de Oncologia, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Matija Snuderl
- Department of Pathology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michelle S Hirsch
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William J Anderson
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ross A Rowsey
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Peter M Sadow
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Department of Pathology, Universita Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Costantino Ricci
- Pathology Unit, Maggiore Hospital-AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Daniel M Berney
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers & Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Andres Martin Acosta
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dong F, Davies KD. Mutational Signatures in Cancer: Laboratory Considerations and Emerging Applications. J Mol Diagn 2023; 25:790-795. [PMID: 37633594 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Patterns of somatic mutations have emerged from the broad sequencing of human cancer genomes. These mutational signatures reflect mechanisms of mutagenesis and DNA repair defects and represent an emerging class of cancer biomarkers. The appropriate interpretation of mutational signatures from sequencing assays holds implications in the reporting of molecular diagnostic results for patients with cancer. This brief review describes the scientific principles, laboratory considerations, and emerging clinical applications of mutational signature analysis from clinical cancer genomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Dong
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| | - Kurtis D Davies
- Emerging and Evolving Biomarker Content Committee, A Working Group of the Training and Education Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology, University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Walker R, Mahmood K, Como J, Clendenning M, Joo JE, Georgeson P, Joseland S, Preston SG, Pope BJ, Chan JM, Austin R, Bojadzieva J, Campbell A, Edwards E, Gleeson M, Goodwin A, Harris MT, Ip E, Kirk J, Mansour J, Mar Fan H, Nichols C, Pachter N, Ragunathan A, Spigelman A, Susman R, Christie M, Jenkins MA, Pai RK, Rosty C, Macrae FA, Winship IM, Buchanan DD. DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Variant Classification: Evaluating the Utility of Somatic Mutations and Mismatch Repair Deficient Colonic Crypts and Endometrial Glands. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4925. [PMID: 37894291 PMCID: PMC10605939 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes (Lynch syndrome) predispose to colorectal (CRC) and endometrial (EC) cancer. Lynch syndrome specific tumor features were evaluated for their ability to support the ACMG/InSiGHT framework in classifying variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) in the MMR genes. Twenty-eight CRC or EC tumors from 25 VUS carriers (6xMLH1, 9xMSH2, 6xMSH6, 4xPMS2), underwent targeted tumor sequencing for the presence of microsatellite instability/MMR-deficiency (MSI-H/dMMR) status and identification of a somatic MMR mutation (second hit). Immunohistochemical testing for the presence of dMMR crypts/glands in normal tissue was also performed. The ACMG/InSiGHT framework reclassified 7/25 (28%) VUS to likely pathogenic (LP), three (12%) to benign/likely benign, and 15 (60%) VUS remained unchanged. For the seven re-classified LP variants comprising nine tumors, tumor sequencing confirmed MSI-H/dMMR (8/9, 88.9%) and a second hit (7/9, 77.8%). Of these LP reclassified variants where normal tissue was available, the presence of a dMMR crypt/gland was found in 2/4 (50%). Furthermore, a dMMR endometrial gland in a carrier of an MSH2 exon 1-6 duplication provides further support for an upgrade of this VUS to LP. Our study confirmed that identifying these Lynch syndrome features can improve MMR variant classification, enabling optimal clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romy Walker
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Khalid Mahmood
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
- Melbourne Bioinformatics, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Julia Como
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Jihoon E. Joo
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Peter Georgeson
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Sharelle Joseland
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Susan G. Preston
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Bernard J. Pope
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
- Melbourne Bioinformatics, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - James M. Chan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Rachel Austin
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (R.A.); (H.M.F.)
| | - Jasmina Bojadzieva
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia; (J.B.); (A.C.)
| | - Ainsley Campbell
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia; (J.B.); (A.C.)
| | - Emma Edwards
- Familial Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia;
| | - Margaret Gleeson
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia; (M.G.); (J.K.); (A.R.)
| | - Annabel Goodwin
- Cancer Genetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (A.G.); (A.S.)
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Marion T. Harris
- Monash Health Familial Cancer Centre, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia;
| | - Emilia Ip
- Cancer Genetics Service, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia;
| | - Judy Kirk
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia; (M.G.); (J.K.); (A.R.)
| | - Julia Mansour
- Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia;
| | - Helen Mar Fan
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (R.A.); (H.M.F.)
| | - Cassandra Nichols
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA 6008, Australia; (C.N.); (N.P.)
| | - Nicholas Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA 6008, Australia; (C.N.); (N.P.)
- Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
- School of Medicine, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Abiramy Ragunathan
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia; (M.G.); (J.K.); (A.R.)
| | - Allan Spigelman
- Cancer Genetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (A.G.); (A.S.)
- St Vincent’s Cancer Genetics Unit, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
- Surgical Professorial Unit, UNSW Clinical School of Clinical Medicine, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Rachel Susman
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (R.A.); (H.M.F.)
| | - Michael Christie
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Department of Pathology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Mark A. Jenkins
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Rish K. Pai
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA;
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
- Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Finlay A. Macrae
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.A.M.); (I.M.W.)
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Ingrid M. Winship
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.A.M.); (I.M.W.)
- Department of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Daniel D. Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.A.M.); (I.M.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Neil AJ, Zhao L, Isidro RA, Srivastava A, Cleary JM, Dong F. SMARCA4 Mutations in Carcinomas of the Esophagus, Esophagogastric Junction, and Stomach. Mod Pathol 2023; 36:100183. [PMID: 37054973 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
Deficiency of SMARCA4, a member of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, has been described in a subset of undifferentiated gastroesophageal carcinomas with an aggressive clinical course. The full spectrum and frequency of SMARCA4 mutations in gastroesophageal cancer are unknown. We interrogated our institutional database and identified patients with gastroesophageal carcinomas who underwent cancer next-generation sequencing. We classified SMARCA4 mutations, assessed histologic features, and correlated SMARCA4 mutations with SMARCA4 protein expression by immunohistochemistry. SMARCA4 mutations were identified in gastroesophageal carcinomas from 107 (9.1%) of 1174 patients. Forty-nine SMARCA4 mutations, including 26 missense variants and 23 protein-truncating variants, were interpreted as pathogenic in 42 (3.6%) of 1174 patients. Thirty (71%) of 42 cancers with pathogenic SMARCA4 mutations were located in the esophagus or esophagogastric junction, and 12 cancers (29%) were located in the stomach. Sixty-four percent of carcinomas with pathogenic truncating SMARCA4 variants were poorly differentiated or undifferentiated compared with 25% of carcinomas with pathogenic missense variants. Eight of 12 carcinomas with truncating SMARCA4 variants and none of the 7 carcinomas with pathogenic SMARCA4 missense variants showed loss of SMARCA4 expression by immunohistochemistry. Four carcinomas with pathogenic truncating SMARCA4 variants were associated with Barrett esophagus. SMARCA4-mutated gastroesophageal cancers were enriched for APC (31%) and CTNNB1 (14%) mutations and exhibited similar frequency of TP53 (76%) and ARID1A (31%) mutations compared with gastroesophageal cancers without pathogenic SMARCA4 mutations. The median overall survival was 13.6 months for patients who presented with metastasis at diagnosis and 22.7 months for patients without metastasis. Overall, SMARCA4-mutated gastroesophageal cancers exhibit a spectrum of histologic grade, an association with Barrett esophagus, and a concurrent mutational pattern similar to SMARCA4-wild-type gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. Although SMARCA4-deficient gastroesophageal carcinomas are associated with poorly differentiated and undifferentiated histology, the spectrum of histologic and molecular features suggests overlapping pathogenic pathways with conventional gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Neil
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lei Zhao
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Raymond A Isidro
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amitabh Srivastava
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Now with Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - James M Cleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Fei Dong
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Acosta AM, Bridge JA, Dal Cin PS, Sholl LM, Cornejo KM, Fletcher CDM, Ulbright TM. Inflammatory and Nested Testicular Sex Cord Tumor: A Novel Neoplasm With Aggressive Clinical Behavior and Frequent EWSR1::ATF1 Gene Fusions. Am J Surg Pathol 2023; 47:504-517. [PMID: 36791251 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
A subset of malignant testicular sex cord tumors (TSCTs), heretofore interpreted as Sertoli cell tumors, not otherwise specified, exhibits distinctive morphologic features that partially overlap with those of seminoma. In this study, we evaluated the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of 13 such tumors. The patients were 20 to 73 years old (median, 36 y), and all with available data presented with testicular masses (median size, 3 cm), with 2 having synchronous retroperitoneal metastases. All 11 patients with available follow-up developed metastases to retroperitoneal lymph nodes, nonretroperitoneal lymph nodes, bone, contralateral testis, and/or lung. Microscopically, the tumors showed solid nests and sheets of epithelioid cells with granular, eosinophilic to clear/vacuolated cytoplasm, admixed in most (12/13) cases with variable proportions of lymphocytes, plasma cells, eosinophils, and neutrophils. Additional features included intracytoplasmic hyaline inclusions and a prominent collagenous, sometimes hyalinized stroma. Mitotic activity was relatively low (median, 1 mitosis/10 HPF), but tumor necrosis was frequent (11/13). Local invasion of adjacent structures and lymphovascular invasion were noted in some tumors (4/9 cases with available data for each feature). All were α-inhibin-positive and lacked nuclear reactivity for β-catenin. In addition, all tested cases were positive for epithelial membrane antigen (9/9) and steroidogenic factor-1 (8/8), and 8/10 expressed CD30. Two "index" cases were initially analyzed using a DNA sequencing panel, which identified EWSR1::ATF1 fusions in both. Subsequently, EWSR1::ATF1 fusions were demonstrated in 8 of the remaining 11 cases using fluorescence in situ hybridization or DNA sequencing. One of the 3 cases that were negative for EWSR1::ATF1 harbored ATF1 amplification. This study, therefore, shows that a group of malignant TSCTs resembling seminoma is characterized by α-inhibin and steroidogenic factor-1 positivity, no expression of nuclear β-catenin, frequent CD30 positivity and recurrent EWSR1::ATF1 fusions. We have descriptively termed these neoplasms "inflammatory and nested TSCT." Importantly, inflammatory and nested TSCTs show significant differences in morphology, immunoprofile, molecular biology, and, likely, clinical behavior from Sertoli cell tumors, not otherwise specified and should be classified separately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andres M Acosta
- Department of Pathology of Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | - Julia A Bridge
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE
- ProPath, Dallas, TX
| | - Paola S Dal Cin
- Department of Pathology of Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | - Lynette M Sholl
- Department of Pathology of Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | | | | | - Thomas M Ulbright
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Health Partners, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yu S, Sholl LM, Siegmund S, Ulbright TM, Collins K, Colecchia M, Del Pilar Gonzalez-Peramato M, Michalová K, Gordetsky JB, Cornejo KM, Kao CS, Wobker SE, Vargas SO, Maclean F, Idrees MT, Anderson WJ, Fletcher CDM, Acosta AM. Large cell calcifying Sertoli cell tumour: molecular and immunohistochemical assessment of a series comprising non-metastasising and metastasising neoplasms. Histopathology 2023; 82:1079-1088. [PMID: 36929593 DOI: 10.1111/his.14895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Large cell calcifying Sertoli cell tumour (LCCSCT) is a type of testicular sex cord-stromal tumour that may occur sporadically or in the context of Carney complex and other genetic syndromes. A subset is clinically malignant, and the molecular mechanisms that drive such aggressive behaviour remain unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 21 samples from 20 patients with LCCSCT (12 non-metastasising and eight metastasising) using PRKAR1A immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing. All tumours except two (cases 17 and 20, both metastasising) demonstrated loss of PRKAR1A expression. Among 11 cases with interpretable sequencing results, all harboured pathogenic single nucleotide variants of PRKAR1A. Evidence of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of PRKAR1A was present in all tumours with interpretable zygosity data, but the mechanisms of LOH were different for non-metastasising and metastasising tumours. Non-metastasising tumours demonstrated only copy-neutral LOH, while metastasising tumours demonstrated a spectrum of mechanisms of LOH, including copy-loss LOH, two concurrent mutations or copy-neutral LOH. Relevant molecular findings in non-metastasising LCCSCT were limited to PRKAR1A variants. In contrast, all metastasising LCCSCTs with interpretable data harboured additional pathogenic variants, including (but not restricted to) BRCA2 mutations with evidence of LOH and bi-allelic CDKN2A/B deletions. Three patients harboured PRKAR1A variants of inferred germline origin, including one with Carney complex and two without known syndromic features. CONCLUSIONS: This study further confirms that PRKAR1A IHC is a useful diagnostic tool for both non-metastasising and metastasising tumours and suggests that molecular analyses can be helpful to identify non-metastasising tumours with malignant potential in selected patients. Importantly, these results highlight that germline assessment could be beneficial for all patients presenting with LCCSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanhong Yu
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lynette M Sholl
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephanie Siegmund
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas M Ulbright
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Katrina Collins
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Department of Pathology, Vita- Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Květoslava Michalová
- Department of Pathology, Charles University, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Jennifer B Gordetsky
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kristine M Cornejo
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chia-Sui Kao
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sara E Wobker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sara O Vargas
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fiona Maclean
- Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Muhammad T Idrees
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - William J Anderson
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher D M Fletcher
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andres M Acosta
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rizzo NM, Sholl LM, Kao CS, Cornejo KM, Sangoi AR, Hirsch MS, Collins K, Gordetsky JB, Reyes Curcio FA, Fletcher CDM, Ulbright TM, Acosta AM. Molecular Correlates of Aggressive Behavior and Biologic Progression in Testicular Sertoli Cell Tumor. Mod Pathol 2023; 36:100152. [PMID: 36906070 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
Sertoli cell tumor (SCT) is the second most common type of sex cord-stromal tumor in men and ∼10% exhibit malignant behavior. Although CTNNB1 variants have been described in SCTs, only a limited number of metastatic cases have been analyzed, and the molecular alterations associated with aggressive behavior remain largely unexplored. This study evaluated a series of nonmetastasizing and metastasizing SCTs using next-generation DNA sequencing to further characterize their genomic landscape. Twenty-two tumors from 21 patients were analyzed. Cases were divided into metastasizing SCTs and nonmetastasizing SCTs. Nonmetastasizing tumors were considered to have aggressive histopathologic features if they exhibited ≥1 of the following: size > 2.4 cm, necrosis, lymphovascular invasion, ≥ 3 mitoses per 10 high-power fields (HPF), severe nuclear atypia or invasive growth. Six patients had metastasizing SCTs and the remaining 15 had nonmetastasizing SCTs; 5 nonmetastasizing tumors had ≥1 aggressive histopathologic feature(s). Gain-of-function CTNNB1 or inactivating APC variants were highly recurrent in nonmetastasizing SCTs (combined frequency >90%), with arm-/chromosomal-level CNVs, loss of 1p and CTNNB1 LOH occurring exclusively in CTNNB1-mutant tumors with aggressive histopathologic features or size >1.5 cm. Nonmetastasizing SCTs were almost invariably driven by WNT pathway activation. In contrast, only 50% of metastasizing SCTs harbored gain-of-function CTNNB1 variants. The remaining 50% of metastasizing SCTs were CTNNB1-wild-type and harbored alterations in TP53, MDM2, CDKN2A/CDKN2B, and TERT pathways. These findings suggest that aggressive SCTs can arise from progression of CTNNB1-mutant benign SCTs, or from CTNNB1-wild type tumors with alterations of TP53, cell cycle regulation, and telomere maintenance pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie M Rizzo
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lynette M Sholl
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Andres M Acosta
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Collins K, Sholl LM, Siegmund S, Dickson BC, Colecchia M, Michalová K, Hwang M, Ulbright TM, Kao CS, van Leenders GJLH, Mehta V, Trpkov K, Yilmaz A, Cimadamore A, Matoso A, Epstein JI, Maclean F, Comperat E, Anderson WJ, Fletcher CDM, Acosta AM. Myoid gonadal stromal tumours are characterised by recurrent chromosome-level copy number gains: molecular assessment of a multi-institutional series. Histopathology 2023; 82:431-438. [PMID: 36226695 DOI: 10.1111/his.14825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Myoid gonadal stromal tumours (MGST) represent a rare type of testicular sex cord-stromal tumour that has recently been recognised as a distinct entity by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of genitourinary tumours. MGSTs affect adult men and have been reported to behave in an indolent fashion. Histologically, MGSTs are pure spindle cell neoplasms that coexpress SMA and S100 protein. Given that the molecular features of these neoplasms remain largely undescribed, we evaluated a multi-institutional series of MGSTs using DNA and RNA sequencing. This study included 12 tumours from 12 patients aged 28 to 57 years. Tumour sizes ranged from 0.6 to 4.3 cm. Aggressive histologic features, such as vascular invasion, necrosis, invasive growth, and atypical mitoses were invariably absent. Mitotic activity was low, with a median of less than 1 mitosis per 10 high power fields (HPF; maximum: 3 mitoses per 10 HPF). Molecular analyses did not identify recurrent mutations or gene fusions. All cases with interpretable copy number variant data (9/10 cases sequenced successfully) demonstrated a consistent pattern of chromosome arm-level and whole-chromosome-level copy number gains indicative of ploidy shifts, with recurrent gains involving chromosomes 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14q, 15q, 17, 18q, 20, and 21q. Similar findings have also been recognised in pure spindle cell and spindle-cell predominant sex cord-stromal tumours without S100 protein expression. MGSTs are characterised by ploidy shifts and may be part of a larger spectrum of spindle cell-predominant sex cord-stromal tumours, including cases without S100 protein expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina Collins
- Departments of Pathology of Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Lynette M Sholl
- Departments of Pathology of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephanie Siegmund
- Departments of Pathology of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brendan C Dickson
- Departments of Pathology of Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Departments of Pathology of Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Michael Hwang
- Departments of Pathology of Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Thomas M Ulbright
- Departments of Pathology of Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Chia-Sui Kao
- Departments of Pathology of Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Vikas Mehta
- Departments of Pathology of University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kiril Trpkov
- Departments of Pathology of Alberta Precision Laboratories and University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Asli Yilmaz
- Departments of Pathology of Alberta Precision Laboratories and University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Alessia Cimadamore
- Departments of Pathology of Polytechnic University of The Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andres Matoso
- Departments of Pathology of The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan I Epstein
- Departments of Pathology of The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Fiona Maclean
- Departments of Pathology of Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology and Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eva Comperat
- Departments of Pathology of Tenon Hospital and Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - William J Anderson
- Departments of Pathology of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher D M Fletcher
- Departments of Pathology of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrés M Acosta
- Departments of Pathology of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Molecular correlates of male germ cell tumors with overgrowth of components resembling somatic malignancies. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:1966-1973. [PMID: 36030288 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-022-01136-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
A small subset of male germ cell tumors (GCT) demonstrates overgrowth of histologic components that resemble somatic malignancies (e.g., sarcoma, carcinoma). The presence of so-called "somatic-type" malignancies (SM) in GCT has been associated with chemotherapy-resistance and poor clinical outcomes in prior studies. However, the molecular characteristics of these tumors remain largely undescribed. In this study, we performed a multi-platform molecular analysis of GCTs with SM diagnosed in 36 male patients (primary site: testis, 29 and mediastinum, 7). The most common histologic types of SM were sarcoma and embryonic-type neuroectodermal tumor (ENT, formerly known as "PNET"), present in 61% and 31% of cases, respectively. KRAS and TP53 mutations were identified by DNA sequencing in 28% of cases each, with enrichment of TP53 mutations in mediastinal tumors (86%). Gains in the short arm of chromosome 12 were seen in 91% of cases, likely reflecting the presence of isochromosome 12p. Numerous copy number changes indicative of widespread aneuploidy were found in 94% of cases. Focal homozygous deletions and amplifications were also detected, including MDM2 amplifications in 16% of cases. Sequencing of paired samples in 8 patients revealed similar mutational and copy number profiles in the conventional GCT and SM components. Oncogenic gene fusions were not detected using RNA sequencing of SM components from 9 cases. DNA methylation analysis highlighted the distinct methylation profile of SM components that sets them apart from conventional GCT components. In conclusion, GCT with SM are characterized by widespread aneuploidy, a distinct epigenetic signature and the presence of mutations that are otherwise rare in testicular GCT without SM. The similarity of the mutational and DNA methylation profiles of different histologic types of SM suggests that the identification of SM components could be more important than their precise histologic subclassification, pending confirmation by further studies.
Collapse
|
11
|
Clinicopathologic and molecular spectrum of testicular sex cord-stromal tumors not amenable to specific histopathologic subclassification. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:1944-1954. [PMID: 36180576 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-022-01155-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
A subset of testicular sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST), which includes neoplasms with mixed histology, cannot be classified into a specific histologic subtype. This study evaluated the clinicopathologic, immunophenotypic and molecular features of 26 SCST not amenable to specific classification by expert uropathologists. Median age at diagnosis was 43 years and median tumor size was 2.4 cm. Follow-up information was available for 18 (69%) patients, with evidence of an aggressive clinical course in 6 patients (4 alive with disease, 2 dead of disease 3 months and 6 months after orchiectomy). Microscopically, SCST not amenable to specific classification demonstrated monophasic epithelioid (9/26, 35%), monophasic spindle cell (5/26, 19%), and biphasic or mixed histology (12/26, 46%). One or more aggressive histopathologic features were seen in 11 cases. DNA sequencing was successful in 22 tumors. Pathogenic CTNNB1 and APC alterations were seen in 7 (33%) and 2 (10%) cases, respectively, with additional variants (e.g., CDKN2A, RB1, TP53, BRCA2) being identified in individual cases. Combined evaluation of morphology, sequencing data and beta-catenin immunohistochemistry resulted in reclassification of 6 (23%) tumors as Sertoli cell tumor, not otherwise specified. This was supported by comparing the methylation profiles of a subset of these tumors and those of typical Sertoli cell tumors. Additionally, a subset of 5 neoplasms (19%) with spindle cell or biphasic histology and SMA expression was characterized by hyperdiploid genomes with recurrent chromosomal gains and absence of driver mutations, possibly representing a distinct tumor type. The SCST that remained not amenable to specific histologic classification (15/26, 58%) were enriched for aggressive histologic features and malignant clinical behavior. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that a subset of testicular SCST that were originally not amenable to specific classification could be reclassified by combined evaluation of morphology, immunohistochemistry and molecular data.
Collapse
|
12
|
A scoping review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of pan-tumour biomarkers (dMMR, MSI, high TMB) in different solid tumours. Sci Rep 2022; 12:20495. [PMID: 36443366 PMCID: PMC9705554 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23319-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved in the USA for tumours exhibiting mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), microsatellite instability (MSI), or high tumour mutational burden (TMB), with regulatory and reimbursement applications in multiple other countries underway. As the estimated budget impacts of future reimbursements depend on the size of the potential target population, we performed a scoping review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of these pan-tumour biomarkers in different cancers. We systematically searched Medline/Embase and included studies reporting the prevalence of dMMR/MSI/high TMB in solid tumours published 01/01/2018-31/01/2021. Meta-analyses were performed separately for the pan-cancer prevalence of each biomarker, and by cancer type and stage where possible. The searches identified 3890 papers, with 433 prevalence estimates for 32 different cancer types from 201 studies included in meta-analyses. The pooled overall prevalence of dMMR, MSI and high TMB (≥ 10 mutations/Mb) in pan-cancer studies was 2.9%, 2.7% and 14.0%, respectively. The prevalence profiles of dMMR/MSI and high TMB differed across cancer types. For example, endometrial, colorectal, small bowel and gastric cancers showed high prevalence of both dMMR and MSI (range: 8.7-26.8% and 8.5-21.9%, respectively) and high TMB (range: 8.5-43.0%), while cervical, esophageal, bladder/urothelial, lung and skin cancers showed low prevalence of dMMR and MSI (< 5%), but high prevalence of high TMB (range: 23.7-52.6%). For other cancer types, prevalence of all three biomarkers was generally low (< 5%). This structured review of dMMR/MSI/high TMB prevalence across cancers and for specific cancer types and stages provide timely evidence to inform budget impact forecasts in health technology assessments for drug approvals based on these pan-tumour biomarkers.
Collapse
|
13
|
Bartley AN, Mills AM, Konnick E, Overman M, Ventura CB, Souter L, Colasacco C, Stadler ZK, Kerr S, Howitt BE, Hampel H, Adams SF, Johnson W, Magi-Galluzzi C, Sepulveda AR, Broaddus RR. Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability Testing for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration With the Association for Molecular Pathology and Fight Colorectal Cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022; 146:1194-1210. [PMID: 35920830 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0632-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for patients with advanced solid tumors that have DNA mismatch repair defects or high levels of microsatellite instability; however, the FDA provided no guidance on which specific clinical assays should be used to determine mismatch repair status. OBJECTIVE.— To develop an evidence-based guideline to identify the optimal clinical laboratory test to identify defects in DNA mismatch repair in patients with solid tumor malignancies who are being considered for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. DESIGN.— The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and develop recommendations. Using the National Academy of Medicine-endorsed Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the recommendations were derived from available evidence, strength of that evidence, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus. Mismatch repair immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability derived from both polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing, and tumor mutation burden derived from large panel next-generation sequencing were within scope. RESULTS.— Six recommendations and 3 good practice statements were developed. More evidence and evidence of higher quality were identified for colorectal cancer and other cancers of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract than for cancers arising outside the GI tract. CONCLUSIONS.— An optimal assay depends on cancer type. For most cancer types outside of the GI tract and the endometrium, there was insufficient published evidence to recommend a specific clinical assay. Absent published evidence, immunohistochemistry is an acceptable approach readily available in most clinical laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela N Bartley
- From the Department of Pathology, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Bartley)
| | - Anne M Mills
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (Mills)
| | - Eric Konnick
- From the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle (Konnick)
| | - Michael Overman
- From the Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Overman)
| | - Christina B Ventura
- From Surveys, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Ventura, Colasacco)
| | - Lesley Souter
- From Methodology Consultant, Smithville, Ontario, Canada (Souter)
| | - Carol Colasacco
- From Surveys, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Ventura, Colasacco)
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- From the Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Stadler)
| | - Sarah Kerr
- From Hospital Pathology Associates, PA, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Kerr)
| | - Brooke E Howitt
- From the Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California (Howitt)
| | - Heather Hampel
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Hampel)
| | - Sarah F Adams
- From the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque (Adams)
| | - Wenora Johnson
- From Fight Colorectal Cancer, Springfield, Missouri (Johnson)
| | - Cristina Magi-Galluzzi
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (Magi-Galluzzi)
| | - Antonia R Sepulveda
- From the Department of Pathology, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia (Sepulveda)
| | - Russell R Broaddus
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill (Broaddus)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
The rapid adoption of next-generation sequencing in clinical oncology has enabled the detection of molecular biomarkers shared between multiple tumor types. These pan-cancer biomarkers include sequence-altering mutations, copy number changes, gene rearrangements, and mutational signatures and have been demonstrated to predict response to targeted therapy. This article reviews issues surrounding current and emerging pan-cancer molecular biomarkers in clinical oncology: technological advances that enable the broad detection of cancer mutations across hundreds of genes, the spectrum of driver and passenger mutations derived from human cancer genomes, and implications for patient care now and in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Dong
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cleary JM, Raghavan S, Wu Q, Li YY, Spurr LF, Gupta HV, Rubinson DA, Fetter IJ, Hornick JL, Nowak JA, Siravegna G, Goyal L, Shi L, Brais LK, Loftus M, Shinagare AB, Abrams TA, Clancy TE, Wang J, Patel AK, Brichory F, Vaslin Chessex A, Sullivan RJ, Keller RB, Denning S, Hill ER, Shapiro GI, Pokorska-Bocci A, Zanna C, Ng K, Schrag D, Janne PA, Hahn WC, Cherniack AD, Corcoran RB, Meyerson M, Daina A, Zoete V, Bardeesy N, Wolpin BM. FGFR2 Extracellular Domain In-Frame Deletions are Therapeutically Targetable Genomic Alterations that Function as Oncogenic Drivers in Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Discov 2021; 11:2488-2505. [PMID: 33926920 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
We conducted next generation DNA sequencing on 335 biliary tract cancers and characterized the genomic landscape by anatomic site within the biliary tree. In addition to frequent FGFR2 fusions among patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), we identified FGFR2 extracellular domain in-frame deletions (EIDs) in 5 of 178 (2.8%) patients with IHCC, including two patients with FGFR2 p.H167_N173del. Expression of this FGFR2 EID in NIH3T3 cells resulted in constitutive FGFR2 activation, oncogenic transformation, and sensitivity to FGFR inhibitors. Three patients with FGFR2 EIDs were treated with Debio 1347, an oral FGFR-1/2/3 inhibitor, and all showed partial responses. One patient developed an acquired L618F FGFR2 kinase domain mutation at disease progression and experienced a further partial response for 17 months to an irreversible FGFR2 inhibitor, futibatinib. Together, these findings reveal FGFR2 EIDs as an alternative mechanism of FGFR2 activation in IHCC that predict sensitivity to FGFR inhibitors in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Cleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | | | - Yvonne Y Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | - Liam F Spurr
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School
| | - Hersh V Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | | | - Jason L Hornick
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | | | | | - Lipika Goyal
- Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School
| | - Lei Shi
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School
| | - Lauren K Brais
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | - Atul B Shinagare
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | | | - Jiping Wang
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - Anuj K Patel
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | | | - Ryan J Sullivan
- Center for Melanoma, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Emma R Hill
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | - Pasi A Janne
- Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | - William C Hahn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | - Andrew D Cherniack
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Brian M Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gallon R, Gawthorpe P, Phelps RL, Hayes C, Borthwick GM, Santibanez-Koref M, Jackson MS, Burn J. How Should We Test for Lynch Syndrome? A Review of Current Guidelines and Future Strategies. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:406. [PMID: 33499123 PMCID: PMC7865939 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
International guidelines for the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (LS) recommend molecular screening of colorectal cancers (CRCs) to identify patients for germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene testing. As our understanding of the LS phenotype and diagnostic technologies have advanced, there is a need to review these guidelines and new screening opportunities. We discuss the barriers to implementation of current guidelines, as well as guideline limitations, and highlight new technologies and knowledge that may address these. We also discuss alternative screening strategies to increase the rate of LS diagnoses. In particular, the focus of current guidance on CRCs means that approximately half of Lynch-spectrum tumours occurring in unknown male LS carriers, and only one-third in female LS carriers, will trigger testing for LS. There is increasing pressure to expand guidelines to include molecular screening of endometrial cancers, the most frequent cancer in female LS carriers. Furthermore, we collate the evidence to support MMR deficiency testing of other Lynch-spectrum tumours to screen for LS. However, a reliance on tumour tissue limits preoperative testing and, therefore, diagnosis prior to malignancy. The recent successes of functional assays to detect microsatellite instability or MMR deficiency in non-neoplastic tissues suggest that future diagnostic pipelines could become independent of tumour tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Burn
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK; (P.G.); (R.L.P.); (C.H.); (G.M.B.); (M.S.-K.); (M.S.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Albayrak A, Garrido-Castro AC, Giannakis M, Umeton R, Manam MD, Stover EH, Porter RL, Johnson BE, Liaw KL, Amonkar M, Church AJ, Janeway KA, Nowak JA, Sholl L, Lin NU, Johnson JM. Clinical Pan-Cancer Assessment of Mismatch Repair Deficiency Using Tumor-Only, Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing. JCO Precis Oncol 2020; 4:1084-1097. [PMID: 35050773 PMCID: PMC10445788 DOI: 10.1200/po.20.00185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Given regulatory approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mismatch repair-deficient (MMR-D) cancers agnostic to tumor type, it has become important to characterize occurrence of MMR-D and develop cost-effective screening approaches. Using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel (OncoPanel), we developed an algorithm to identify MMR-D frequency in tumor samples and applied it in a clinical setting with pathologist review. METHODS To predict MMR-D, we adapted methods described previously for use in NGS panels, which assess patterns of single base-pair insertion or deletion events occurring in homopolymer regions. Tumors assayed with OncoPanel between July 2013 and July 2018 were included. For tumors tested after June 2017, sequencing results were presented to pathologists in real time for clinical MMR determination, in the context of tumor mutation burden, other mutational signatures, and clinical data. RESULTS Of 20,301 tumors sequenced, 2.7% (553) were retrospectively classified as MMR-D by the algorithm. Of 4,404 samples with pathologist sign-out of MMR status, the algorithm classified 147 (3.3%) as MMR-D: in 116 cases, MMR-D was confirmed by a pathologist, five cases were overruled by the pathologist, and 26 were assessed as indeterminate. Overall, the highest frequencies of OncoPanel-inferred MMR-D were in endometrial (21%; 152/723), colorectal (9.7%; 169/1,744), and small bowel (9.3%; 9/97) cancers. When algorithm predictions were compared with historical MMR immunohistochemistry or polymerase chain reaction results in a set of 325 tumors sequenced before initiation of pathologist assessment, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm were 91.1% and 98.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION We show that targeted, tumor-only NGS can be leveraged to determine MMR signatures across tumor types, suggesting that broader biomarker screening approaches may have clinical value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adem Albayrak
- Informatics and Analytics Department, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ana C. Garrido-Castro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Marios Giannakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Renato Umeton
- Informatics and Analytics Department, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | | | - Elizabeth H. Stover
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rebecca L. Porter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Bruce E. Johnson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Alanna J. Church
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Jonathan A. Nowak
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Lynette Sholl
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Nancy U. Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jason M. Johnson
- Informatics and Analytics Department, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Purpose of review: Identification of Lynch syndrome is important from an individual patient and public health standpoint. As paradigms for Lynch syndrome diagnosis have shifted in recent years, this review will discuss rationale and limitations for current strategies as well as provide an overview of future directions in the field. Recent findings: In recent years, the use of clinical criteria and risk scores for identification of Lynch syndrome have been augmented by universal testing of all newly diagnosed colorectal cancers with molecular methods to screen for mismatch repair deficiency with high sensitivity and specificity. Studies of implementation and outcomes of universal testing in clinical practice have demonstrated significant heterogeneity that results in suboptimal uptake and contributes to disparities in diagnosis. Emerging technologies, such as next-generation sequencing, hold significant promise as a screening strategy for Lynch syndrome. Summary: Universal testing for Lynch syndrome is being performed with increasing frequency, although real-world outcomes have demonstrated room for improvement. Future directions in Lynch syndrome diagnosis will involve optimization of universal testing workflow and application of new genetics technologies.
Collapse
|