Hysterectomy, Oophorectomy, and Risk of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Hysterectomy - A Possible Risk Factor for Operative Intervention in Female Patients for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Conditions: A Case Control and Cohort Study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Researchers have recently linked hysterectomy, which alters sex hormone levels, to diseases like osteoporosis, lumbar spondylolisthesis, hypertension and diabetes etc. However, the association between hysterectomy and lumbar disc herniation (LDH)/lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) remains unclarified.

PURPOSE

To determine whether there is a correlation between hysterectomy and surgical intervention for LDH/LSS in women, further substantiated through imaging and clinical research.

STUDY DESIGN

A case control and cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The study group comprised 1202 female patients aged 45 and older who had undergone operative treatment due to LDH/LSS (825 for LDH and 377 for LSS), and the comparison group comprised 1168 females without lumbar diseases who visited health examination clinic during the same period. One hundred and two hysterectomized patients were further selected (Hysterectomy cohort) and matched approximately with the control cohort at a 1:2 ratio from the study group with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the association between hysterectomy and surgical intervention for LDH/LSS in women after adjusted by confounding factors. Patients from both the hysterectomy and control cohorts underwent a comprehensive assessment. This assessment included the evaluation of several parameters: the functional cross-sectional area, fat infiltration rate, relative functional cross-sectional area of the lumbar paravertebral muscles, facet joint degeneration grade, cartilage endplate damage, Modic changes for the L3/4-L5/S1 segments, Pfirrmann grade of lumbar disc degeneration, and disc height index for the L1/2-L5/S1 segments. Additionally, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were recorded preoperatively and at the last follow-up.

METHODS

Associations between hysterectomy and patients treated surgically for LDH or LSS were analyzed using multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis. Lumbar X-ray, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to evaluate the imaging variables. Imaging and clinical variables were compared.

RESULTS

Hysterectomized women were associated with requiring surgery due to LDH/LSS, with ORs of 2.613 (P < 0.001) and 2.084 (P = 0.006), respectively. The imaging evaluation further revealed that the hysterectomy cohort had more severe degeneration of the paraspinal muscles, facet joints, endplates, and intervertebral discs, Modic changes at L3/4-L5/S1 segments, and intervertebral height reduction at L1/2-L5/S1 segments when compared to the control cohort (P < 0.01). Compared to the control cohort, the hysterectomy cohort exhibited higher preoperative and last follow-up VAS scores for low back pain, and last follow-up JOA scores (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of this study, it seems that women who have had a hysterectomy are correlated with requiring surgical intervention due to LDH/LSS. Imaging and clinical studies also indicate that hysterectomized patients exhibited more severe lumbar degeneration and back pain.

Long-term outcomes of hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to provide an up-to-date systematic review of "the long-term outcomes of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy" and perform a meta-analysis for the reported associations.

DATA SOURCES

Our study updated a previous systematic review by searching the literature using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for publications between January 2015 and August 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Our study included studies of women who had a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy vs women who had a hysterectomy with ovarian conservation or no surgery.

METHODS

The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. Adjusted hazard ratios were extracted and combined to obtain fixed effect estimates.

RESULTS

Compared with hysterectomy or no surgery, hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in young women was associated with decreased risk of breast cancer (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.84) but with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.47). In addition, it was associated with an increased risk of total cardiovascular diseases, coronary heart disease, and stroke with hazard ratios of 1.18 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.25), 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.25), and 1.20 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.31), respectively. Compared with no surgery, hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy before the age of 50 years was associated with an increased risk of hyperlipidemia (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.65), diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.24), hypertension (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.20), dementia (hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.69), and depression (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.60). The evidence on the association with all-cause mortality in young women showed substantial heterogeneity between the studies (I2=85%; P<.01).

CONCLUSION

Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with multiple long-term outcomes. The benefits of the addition of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy to hysterectomy should be balanced against the risks.

Effect of chronic viral hepatitis and metabolic factors on renal cancer risk in a large cohort in Republic of Korea

PURPOSE

We investigated the association between hepatic and metabolic factors and renal cancer risk.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study included cancer-free individuals who underwent general health evaluation (January to December 2010) at the Korean National Health Insurance Service and followed-up through 2017. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), determined by adjusted Cox regression analysis were used to investigate the effect of variables on renal cancer risk.

RESULTS

Among 4,518,704 subjects, 6531 patients developed renal cancer. Adjusted analyses of epidemiological factors and BMI (body mass index) (Model I) showed serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ≥60 mg/dL (adjusted HR [aHR] 0.88, 95% CI, 0.81-0.95) reduced renal cancer risk comparing to low HDL-C, whereas hepatitis B virus (HBV) antigen (aHR 1.41, 95% CI 1.19-1.68) and chronic HBV infection (aHR 1.65, 95% CI 1.26-2.17) increased its risk. Higher BMI increased renal cancer risk in dose-dependent manner (P for trend <0.001). This association persisted after adjustment for epidemiological factors and waist circumference (Model II). Sex-specific analyses showed similar effect of HBV antigen and chronic HBV infection in both sexes. Normal (50-59 mg/dL in women) or high (≥60 mg/dL in men) HDL-C reduced renal cancer risk. Alcohol consumption increased kidney cancer risk in age ≥ 60 years, but it had no association with renal cancer in age < 60 years.

CONCLUSIONS

High serum HDL-C levels reduced and HBV antigen and chronic HBV infection increased renal cancer risk across different adjusted analysis models. This effect of low HDL-C and chronic HBV infection persisted in sex-based subanalysis.

Is hysterectomy associated with kidney cancer risk? A meta-analysis of cohort studies

Introduction

Emerging evidence have suggested a potential relationship between hysterectomy and risk of kidney cancer with inconsistent results. We aimed to investigate the association of hysterectomy with kidney cancer risk based on a meta-analysis of all available cohort studies.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed in the PubMed and Embase database, covering all the papers published by September 2022. The pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a DerSimonian and Laird random effects model.

Results

Overall, our meta-analysis included 10 cohorts from 9 studies with approximately 240 million participants. The pooled RR with its 95% CI showed a significantly positive association between hysterectomy and risk of kidney cancer (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.19-1.41). No obvious heterogeneity was observed across the studies (P = 0.206 for heterogeneity; I2 = 25.9%).

Conclusion

Findings from this meta-analysis of cohort studies indicated that hysterectomy was positively associated with subsequent kidney cancer risk. Further large prospective studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to verify these findings.

Reproductive and hormonal factors and risk of renal cell carcinoma among women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is twice as common among men compared with women, and hormonal factors have been suggested to partially explain this difference. There is currently little evidence on the roles of reproductive and hormonal risk factors in RCC aetiology.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We investigated associations of age at menarche and age at menopause, pregnancy-related factors, hysterectomy and ovariectomy and exogenous hormone use with RCC risk among 298,042 women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.

RESULTS

During 15 years of follow-up, 438 RCC cases were identified. Parous women had higher rates of RCC compared with nulliparous women (HR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.18, 2.46), and women who were older at age of first pregnancy had lower rates of RCC (30 years + vs. <20 years HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.34, 0.82). Additionally, we identified a positive association for hysterectomy (HR = 1.43 95% CI 1.09, 1.86) and bilateral ovariectomy (HR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.13, 2.47), but not unilateral ovariectomy (HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.61, 1.62) with RCC risk. No clear associations were found for age at menarche, age at menopause or exogenous hormone use.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that parity and reproductive organ surgeries may play a role in RCC aetiology.

Sex and Gender Differences in Kidney Cancer: Clinical and Experimental Evidence

Simple Summary

Kidney cancer is a frequent malignant tumor that accounts for approximately 5% of all cancer incidences. It affects both males and females, but males are twice as likely to develop kidney cancer than females. Evidence shows that this discrepancy takes root in individual differences, such as genetics or pathologies that affect the patient. It is then reflected in the clinical characteristics of the tumors, as males have larger and more aggressive tumors. Understanding the sex- and gender-based differences in kidney cancer is essential to be able to offer patients individualized medicine that would better cover their needs in terms of prevention, diagnosis and treatment.

Abstract

Sex and gender disparities have been reported for different types of non-reproductive cancers. Males are two times more likely to develop kidney cancer than females and have a higher death rate. These differences can be explained by looking at genetics and genomics, as well as other risk factors such as hypertension and obesity, lifestyle, and female sex hormones. Examination of the hormonal signaling pathways bring further insights into sex-related differences. Sex and gender-based disparities can be observed at the diagnostic, histological and treatment levels, leading to significant outcome difference. This review summarizes the current knowledge about sex and gender-related differences in the clinical presentation of patients with kidney cancer and the possible biological mechanisms that could explain these observations. Underlying sex-based differences may contribute to the development of sex-specific prognostic and diagnostic tools and the improvement of personalized therapies.