1
|
Fan WX, Su F, Zhang Y, Zhang XL, Du YY, Gao YJ, Li WL, Hu WQ, Zhao J. Oncological characteristics, treatments and prognostic outcomes in MMR-deficient colorectal cancer. Biomark Res 2024; 12:89. [PMID: 39183366 PMCID: PMC11346251 DOI: 10.1186/s40364-024-00640-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the third most prevalent cancer globally. It's recognized that the molecular subtype of CRC, characterized by mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), plays a critical role in determining appropriate treatment strategies. This review examines the current molecular classifications, focusing on dMMR/MSI-H CRC and its subtypes: Lynch syndrome (LS), Lynch-like syndrome (LLS), and sporadic cases. Despite advances in understanding of these genetic backgrounds, clinical trials have not conclusively differentiated the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors among these subgroups. Therefore, while this review details the molecular characteristics and their general implications for treatment and prognosis, it also highlights the limitations and the need for more refined clinical studies to ascertain tailored therapeutic strategies for each subtype. Furthermore, this review summarizes completed and ongoing clinical studies, emphasizing the importance of developing treatments aligned more closely with molecular profiles. By discussing these aspects, the review seeks to provide a comprehensive analysis of oncological characteristics, presenting a detailed understanding of their implications for treatment and prognosis in dMMR/MSI-H CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Xuan Fan
- Graduate School of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030607, China
- Department of Oncology, Changzhi People's Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000, China
| | - Fei Su
- Graduate School of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030607, China
- Department of Oncology, Changzhi People's Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Changzhi People's Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000, China
- Graduate School of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000, China
| | - Xiao-Ling Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Changzhi People's Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000, China
| | - Yun-Yi Du
- Department of Oncology, Changzhi People's Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000, China
| | - Yang-Jun Gao
- Department of Oncology, Changzhi People's Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000, China
| | - Wei-Ling Li
- Department of Oncology, Changzhi People's Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000, China
- Graduate School of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000, China
| | - Wen-Qing Hu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzhi People's Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000, China
| | - Jun Zhao
- Department of Oncology, Changzhi People's Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Emelyanova M, Ikonnikova A, Pushkov A, Pudova E, Krasnov G, Popova A, Zhanin I, Khomich D, Abramov I, Tjulandin S, Gryadunov D, Pokataev I. Mutations in Mismatch Repair Genes and Microsatellite Instability Status in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2111. [PMID: 38893230 PMCID: PMC11171205 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Revised: 05/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) showing mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency may benefit from immunotherapy. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of MMR deficiency (MMR-D). Here, we estimated the prevalence of MSI in PC, investigated germline and somatic mutations in the three MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6), and assessed the relationship between MMR genes mutations and MSI status in PC. Clinical specimens from PC patients were analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing, including paired normal and tumor specimens from 155 patients, tumor-only specimens from 86 patients, and normal-only specimens from 379 patients. The MSI status of 235 PCs was assessed via PCR. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variants in the MMR genes were identified in 1.1% of patients, while somatic variants were found in 2.6% of patients. No MSI-H tumors were detected. One patient carried two variants (P (VAF = 0.57) and LP (VAF = 0.25)) simultaneously; however, their germline/somatic status remains unknown due to the investigation focusing solely on the tumor and MSI analysis was not performed for this patient. MSI is rare in PC, even in tumors with MMR genes mutations. Our findings underscore the importance of assessing tumor MMR-D status in PC patients with confirmed Lynch syndrome when deciding whether to prescribe immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Emelyanova
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia; (A.I.); (E.P.); (G.K.); (D.K.); (I.A.); (D.G.)
| | - Anna Ikonnikova
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia; (A.I.); (E.P.); (G.K.); (D.K.); (I.A.); (D.G.)
| | - Alexander Pushkov
- Federal State Autonomous Institution “National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 119991, Russia; (A.P.); (I.Z.)
| | - Elena Pudova
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia; (A.I.); (E.P.); (G.K.); (D.K.); (I.A.); (D.G.)
| | - George Krasnov
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia; (A.I.); (E.P.); (G.K.); (D.K.); (I.A.); (D.G.)
| | - Anna Popova
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center for Oncology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 115522, Russia; (A.P.); (S.T.); (I.P.)
| | - Ilya Zhanin
- Federal State Autonomous Institution “National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 119991, Russia; (A.P.); (I.Z.)
| | - Darya Khomich
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia; (A.I.); (E.P.); (G.K.); (D.K.); (I.A.); (D.G.)
| | - Ivan Abramov
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia; (A.I.); (E.P.); (G.K.); (D.K.); (I.A.); (D.G.)
| | - Sergei Tjulandin
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center for Oncology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 115522, Russia; (A.P.); (S.T.); (I.P.)
| | - Dmitry Gryadunov
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia; (A.I.); (E.P.); (G.K.); (D.K.); (I.A.); (D.G.)
| | - Ilya Pokataev
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center for Oncology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 115522, Russia; (A.P.); (S.T.); (I.P.)
- City Clinical Cancer Hospital No 1, Moscow Department of Health, Moscow 129090, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kang SY, Kim DG, Kim KM. BAT26 Only Microsatellite Instability with High Tumor Mutation Burden—A Rare Entity Associated with PTEN Protein Loss and High PD-L1 Expression. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms231810730. [PMID: 36142641 PMCID: PMC9504117 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Detecting microsatellite instability (MSI) in advanced cancers is crucial for clinical decision-making, as it helps in identifying patients with differential treatment responses and prognoses. BAT26 is a highly sensitive MSI marker that defines the mismatch repair (MMR) status with high sensitivity and specificity. However, isolated BAT26-only instability is rare and has not been previously reported. Of the 6476 cases tested using pentaplex MSI polymerase chain reaction, we identified two BAT26-only instability cases (0.03%) in this study. The case #1 patient was diagnosed with endometrial adenocarcinoma without MMR germline mutations. The endometrial tumor showed BAT26-only instability, partial loss of MLH1/PMS2 protein expression, and a high programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS = 8). The tumor exhibited a somatic phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) R303P missense mutation and loss of the PTEN protein. On a comprehensive cancer panel sequencing with ≥500 genes, the tumor showed an MSI score of 11.38% and high tumor mutation burden (TMB) (19.5 mt/mb). The case #2 patient was diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma with proficient MMR and PTEN protein loss without PTEN alteration, as well as a high PD-L1 CPS (CPS = 10). A pathogenic KRAS A146T mutation was detected with an MSI score of 3.36% and high TMB (13 mt/mb). In conclusion, BAT26-only instability is very rare and associated with PTEN protein loss, high TMB, and a high PD-L1 score. Our results suggest that patients with BAT26-only instability may show good responses to immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- So Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Deok Geun Kim
- Department of Clinical Genomic Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea
- Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute of Health Science and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Kyoung-Mee Kim
- Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
- Center of Companion Diagnostics, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-2-3410-2807; Fax: +82-2-3410-6396
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Microsatellite Instability: From the Implementation of the Detection to a Prognostic and Predictive Role in Cancers. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23158726. [PMID: 35955855 PMCID: PMC9369169 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) has been identified in several tumors arising from either germline or somatic aberration. The presence of MSI in cancer predicts the sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors. To date, the predictive role of MSI is currently used in the selection of colorectal cancer patients for immunotherapy; moreover, the expansion of clinical trials into other cancer types may elucidate the predictive value of MSI for non-colorectal tumors. In clinical practice, several assays are used for MSI testing, including immunohistochemistry (IHC), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). In this review, we provide an overview of MSI in various cancer types, highlighting its potential predictive/prognostic role and the clinical trials performed. Finally, we focus on the comparison data between the different assays used to detect MSI in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
5
|
Amemiya K, Hirotsu Y, Nagakubo Y, Watanabe S, Amemiya S, Mochizuki H, Oyama T, Kondo T, Omata M. Simple IHC reveals complex MMR alternations than PCR assays: Validation by LCM and next-generation sequencing. Cancer Med 2022; 11:4479-4490. [PMID: 35596629 PMCID: PMC9741978 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Evaluation of the status of mismatch repair (MMR) in tumors is crucial for determining the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Conventional PCR (MSI-PCR) is the gold standard for confirming the MMR status. However, it requires visual confirmation and presents difficulties in determining MMR status. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a simple method and can confirming MMR protein expression in the whole tumor. We aim to investigate IHC is more suitable for evaluating MMR status in the tumor. We compared MSI-PCR and IHC by testing 319 samples from 284 patients across 14 cancer types. In discordant cases, we performed laser-capture microdissection and microsatellite instability assay by next-generation sequencing (MSI-NGS). The concordance rate between IHC and MSI-PCR testing was 98.1% (313/319). Two reasons for these discrepancies were ambiguous MSI-PCR results and heterogeneous MSI status within the tumor. Among six cases (1.9%), three were judged as MSI-H by MSI-PCR but with proficient MMR by IHC. The results of MSI-NGS revealed microsatellite stable in these three cases. The remaining three cases, two of three were MSI-H and one was MSS in whole tumor in MSI-PCR. IHC showed a "mosaic" pattern containing both proficient MMR and deficient MMR portions by IHC in all three cases. We performed microdissection and MSI-PCR and found intratumoral heterogeneity of MMR status. These results indicated the advantages of IHC and performed expanded samples (n = 1082) and two additional mosaic cases were identified. Our results clearly indicated that simple IHC is the best choice for determining MMR alterations in critical cases for ICIs treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Amemiya
- Division of Genetics and Clinical LaboratoryYamanashi Cental HospitalYamanashiJapan,Genome Analysis CenterYamanashi Cental HospitalYamanashiJapan,Department of Pathology, School of MedicineUniversity of YamanashiYamanashiJapan
| | - Yosuke Hirotsu
- Division of Genetics and Clinical LaboratoryYamanashi Cental HospitalYamanashiJapan,Genome Analysis CenterYamanashi Cental HospitalYamanashiJapan
| | - Yuki Nagakubo
- Division of Genetics and Clinical LaboratoryYamanashi Cental HospitalYamanashiJapan
| | | | - Saki Amemiya
- Department of PathologyYamanashi Central HospitalYamanashiJapan
| | | | - Toshio Oyama
- Department of PathologyYamanashi Central HospitalYamanashiJapan
| | - Tetsuo Kondo
- Department of Pathology, School of MedicineUniversity of YamanashiYamanashiJapan
| | - Masao Omata
- Department of GastroenterologyYamanashi Central HospitalYamanashiJapan,Department of GastroenterologyThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Assessment of Microsatellite Instability from Next-Generation Sequencing Data. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2022; 1361:75-100. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-91836-1_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
7
|
Leelatian N, Hong CS, Bindra RS. The Role of Mismatch Repair in Glioblastoma Multiforme Treatment Response and Resistance. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2021; 32:171-180. [PMID: 33781500 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2020.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Mismatch repair (MMR) is a highly conserved DNA repair pathway that is critical for the maintenance of genomic integrity. This pathway targets base substitution and insertion-deletion mismatches, which primarily arise from replication errors that escape DNA polymerase proof-reading function. Here, the authors review key concepts in the molecular mechanisms of MMR in response to alkylation damage, approaches to detect MMR status in the clinic, and the clinical relevance of this pathway in glioblastoma multiforme treatment response and resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nalin Leelatian
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street LH 108, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Christopher S Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street Tompkins 4, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Ranjit S Bindra
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street Hunter 2, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
In vivo anticancer activity of a rhodium metalloinsertor in the HCT116 xenograft tumor model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:17535-17542. [PMID: 32661159 PMCID: PMC7395490 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2006569117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies are a hallmark of various cancers causing accumulation of DNA mutations and mismatches, which often results in chemotherapy resistance. Metalloinsertor complexes, including [Rh(chrysi)(phen)(PPO)]Cl2 (Rh-PPO), specifically target DNA mismatches and selectively induce cytotoxicity within MMR-deficient cells. Here, we present an in vivo analysis of Rh-PPO, our most potent metalloinsertor. Studies with HCT116 xenograft tumors revealed a 25% reduction in tumor volume and 12% increase in survival with metalloinsertor treatment (1 mg/kg; nine intraperitoneal doses over 20 d). When compared to oxaliplatin, Rh-PPO displays ninefold higher potency at tumor sites. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed rapid absorption of Rh-PPO in plasma with notable accumulation in the liver compared to tumors. Additionally, intratumoral metalloinsertor administration resulted in enhanced anticancer effects, pointing to a need for more selective delivery methods. Overall, these data show that Rh-PPO inhibits xenograft tumor growth, supporting the strategy of using Rh-PPO as a chemotherapeutic targeted to MMR-deficient cancers.
Collapse
|
9
|
Sundar R, Smyth EC, Peng S, Yeong JPS, Tan P. Predictive Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Gastroesophageal Cancers. Front Oncol 2020; 10:763. [PMID: 32500029 PMCID: PMC7243739 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibition has transformed cancer treatment. For gastroesophageal cancer, this class of drugs have demonstrated durable responses and survival benefit in a subgroup of patients, resulting in regulatory approval. However, several recent randomized phase III studies in gastroesophageal cancer have reported negative results, blunting initial enthusiasm. Identification and validation of predictive biomarkers with appropriate patient selection for benefit from immunotherapy is an area of intense research with novel concepts rapidly emerging. In this review we describe the latest immune checkpoint inhibitor trials which have been reported in gastroesophageal cancers with a focus on predictive biomarkers. We also explore novel biomarkers being developed to improve precision oncology for immunotherapy in gastroesophageal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raghav Sundar
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- The N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elizabeth C. Smyth
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Siyu Peng
- University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joe P. S. Yeong
- Division of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Institute of Molecular Cell Biology, Agency of Science, Technology and Research (ASTAR), Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Patrick Tan
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
- SingHealth/Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nano A, Bailis JM, Mariano NF, Pham ED, Threatt SD, Barton JK. Cell-Selective Cytotoxicity of a Fluorescent Rhodium Metalloinsertor Conjugate Results from Irreversible DNA Damage at Base Pair Mismatches. Biochemistry 2020; 59:717-726. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b01037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adela Nano
- Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
| | - Julie M. Bailis
- Department of Oncology Research, Amgen Research, Amgen, Inc., South San Francisco, California 94080, United States
| | - Natalie F. Mariano
- Department of Oncology Research, Amgen Research, Amgen, Inc., South San Francisco, California 94080, United States
| | - Elizabeth D. Pham
- Department of Oncology Research, Amgen Research, Amgen, Inc., South San Francisco, California 94080, United States
| | - Stephanie D. Threatt
- Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
| | - Jacqueline K. Barton
- Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Evrard C, Tachon G, Randrian V, Karayan-Tapon L, Tougeron D. Microsatellite Instability: Diagnosis, Heterogeneity, Discordance, and Clinical Impact in Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:E1567. [PMID: 31618962 PMCID: PMC6826728 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11101567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2019] [Revised: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency testing is important to the identification of Lynch syndrome and decision making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) and has become an indispensable test in metastatic tumors due to the high efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in deficient MMR (dMMR) tumors. CRCs greatly benefit from this testing as approximately 15% of them are dMMR but only 3% to 5% are at a metastatic stage. MMR status can be determined by two different methods, microsatellite instability (MSI) testing on tumor DNA, and immunohistochemistry of the MMR proteins on tumor tissue. Recent studies have reported a rate of 3% to 10% of discordance between these two tests. Moreover, some reports suggest possible intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity of MMR and MSI status. These issues are important to know and to clarify in order to define therapeutic strategy in CRC. This review aims to detail the standard techniques used for the determination of MMR and MSI status, along with their advantages and limits. We review the discordances that may arise between these two tests, tumor heterogeneity of MMR and MSI status, and possible explanations. We also discuss the strategies designed to distinguish sporadic versus germline dMMR/MSI CRC. Finally, we present new and accurate methods aimed at determining MMR/MSI status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Evrard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
| | - Gaëlle Tachon
- Department of Cancer biology, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
- Faculty of medicine, University of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
- Laboratory of Experimental and Clinical Neuroscience, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM) 1084, F-86073 Poitiers, France.
| | - Violaine Randrian
- Faculty of medicine, University of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
- Department of Gastroenterology, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
| | - Lucie Karayan-Tapon
- Department of Cancer biology, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
- Faculty of medicine, University of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
- Laboratory of Experimental and Clinical Neuroscience, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM) 1084, F-86073 Poitiers, France.
| | - David Tougeron
- Department of Medical Oncology, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
- Faculty of medicine, University of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
- Department of Gastroenterology, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boyle KM, Nano A, Day C, Barton JK. Cellular Target of a Rhodium Metalloinsertor is the DNA Base Pair Mismatch. Chemistry 2019; 25:3014-3019. [PMID: 30615818 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201900042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) are commonly found in various cancers, especially in colorectal cancers. Despite the high prevalence of MMR-deficient cancers, mismatch-targeted therapeutics are limited and diagnostic tools are indirect. Here, we examine the cytotoxic properties of a rhodium metalloinsertor, [Rh(phen)(chrysi)(PPO)]2+ (RhPPO) in 27 diverse colorectal cancer cell lines. Despite the low frequency of genomic mismatches and the non-covalent nature of the RhPPO-DNA lesion, RhPPO is on average five times more potent than cisplatin. Importantly, the biological target and profile for RhPPO differs from that of cisplatin. A fluorescent metalloinsertor, RhCy3, was used to demonstrate that the cellular target of RhPPO is the DNA mismatch. RhCy3 represents a direct probe for MMR-deficiency and correlates directly with the cytotoxicity of RhPPO across different cell lines. Overall, our studies clearly indicate that RhPPO and RhCy3 are promising anticancer and diagnostic probes for MMR-deficient cancers, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey M Boyle
- Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, MC 127-72, Pasadena, California, 91125, USA
| | - Adela Nano
- Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, MC 127-72, Pasadena, California, 91125, USA
| | - Catherine Day
- Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, MC 127-72, Pasadena, California, 91125, USA
| | - Jacqueline K Barton
- Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, MC 127-72, Pasadena, California, 91125, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Baudrin LG, Deleuze JF, How-Kit A. Molecular and Computational Methods for the Detection of Microsatellite Instability in Cancer. Front Oncol 2018; 8:621. [PMID: 30631754 PMCID: PMC6315116 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a genomic alteration in which microsatellites, usually of one to four nucleotide repeats, accumulate mutations corresponding to deletions/insertions of a few nucleotides. The MSI phenotype has been extensively characterized in colorectal cancer and is due to a deficiency of the DNA mismatch repair system. MSI has recently been shown to be present in most types of cancer with variable frequencies (from <1 to 30%). It correlates positively to survival outcome and predicts the response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. The different methods developed for MSI detection in cancer require taking into consideration two critical parameters which influence method performance. First, the microsatellite markers used should be chosen carefully to ensure they are highly sensitive and specific for MSI detection. Second, the analytical method used should be highly resolute to allow clear identification of MSI and of the mutant allele genotype, and should present the lowest limit of detection possible for application in samples with low mutant allele frequency. In this review, we describe all the different molecular and computational methods developed to date for the detection of MSI in cancer, how they have evolved and improved over the years, and their advantages and drawbacks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura G Baudrin
- Laboratoire de Génomique, Fondation Jean Dausset-CEPH, Paris, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence GenMed Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jean-François Deleuze
- Laboratoire de Génomique, Fondation Jean Dausset-CEPH, Paris, France.,Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, CEA-Institut François Jacob, Evry, France
| | - Alexandre How-Kit
- Laboratoire de Génomique, Fondation Jean Dausset-CEPH, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lifestyle Factors, Colorectal Tumor Methylation, and Survival Among African Americans and European Americans. Sci Rep 2018; 8:9470. [PMID: 29930328 PMCID: PMC6013500 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27738-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Differences in tumor characteristics might partially account for mortality disparities between African American (AA) and European American (EA) colorectal cancer patients. We evaluated effect modification by race for exposure and patient-outcomes associations with colorectal tumor methylation among 218 AA and 267 EA colorectal cancer cases from the population-based North Carolina Colon Cancer Study. Tumor methylation was assessed in CACNA1G, MLH1, NEUROG1, RUNX3, and SOCS1. We used logistic regression to assess whether associations between several lifestyle factors-intake of fruits, vegetables, folate, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-and tumor methylation were modified by race. Proportional hazards models were used to evaluate whether race modified associations between tumor methylation and time to all-cause mortality. Greater fruit consumption was associated with greater odds of high NEUROG1 methylation among EA at methylation cut points of 15-35% (maximum OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.66, 7.13) but not among AA. Higher folate intake was associated with lower odds of high CACNA1G methylation among EAs but not AAs. Tumor methylation was not associated with all-cause mortality for either group. Race might modify associations between lifestyle factors and colorectal tumor methylation, but in this sample did not appear to modify associations between tumor methylation and all-cause mortality.
Collapse
|
15
|
Sepulveda AR, Hamilton SR, Allegra CJ, Grody W, Cushman-Vokoun AM, Funkhouser WK, Kopetz SE, Lieu C, Lindor NM, Minsky BD, Monzon FA, Sargent DJ, Singh VM, Willis J, Clark J, Colasacco C, Bryan Rumble R, Temple-Smolkin R, B Ventura C, Nowak JA. Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017; 141:625-657. [PMID: 28165284 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0554-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES - To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens. METHODS - The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted. RESULTS - Twenty-one guideline statements were established. CONCLUSIONS - Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia R Sepulveda
- From the 1 Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | | | - Carmen J Allegra
- 5 Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville
| | - Wayne Grody
- 6 Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pediatrics, and Human Genetics, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - William K Funkhouser
- 8 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill
| | | | - Christopher Lieu
- 9 Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver
| | | | - Bruce D Minsky
- 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Daniel J Sargent
- 12 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Joseph Willis
- 14 Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jennifer Clark
- 15 ASCP Institute for Science, Technology, and Policy, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC
| | - Carol Colasacco
- 16 Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | - R Bryan Rumble
- 17 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | | | - Christina B Ventura
- 16 Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | - Jan A Nowak
- From the 1 Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY
- 2 Department of Pathology
- 3 Department of Gastrointestinal (GI) Medical Oncology
- 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- 5 Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville
- 6 Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pediatrics, and Human Genetics, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
- 7 Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
- 8 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill
- 9 Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver
- 10 Department of Medical Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
- 11 Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX
- 12 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- 13 Biocept, San Diego, CA
- 14 Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
- 15 ASCP Institute for Science, Technology, and Policy, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC
- 16 Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
- 17 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
- 18 Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD
- 19 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sepulveda AR, Hamilton SR, Allegra CJ, Grody W, Cushman-Vokoun AM, Funkhouser WK, Kopetz SE, Lieu C, Lindor NM, Minsky BD, Monzon FA, Sargent DJ, Singh VM, Willis J, Clark J, Colasacco C, Rumble RB, Temple-Smolkin R, Ventura CB, Nowak JA. Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Mol Diagn 2017; 19:187-225. [PMID: 28185757 PMCID: PMC5971222 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens. METHODS The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted. RESULTS Twenty-one guideline statements were established. CONCLUSIONS Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented. Key Words: Molecular diagnostics; Gastrointestinal; Histology; Genetics; Oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia R Sepulveda
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY.
| | - Stanley R Hamilton
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Carmen J Allegra
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville
| | - Wayne Grody
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pediatrics, and Human Genetics, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - William K Funkhouser
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill
| | - Scott E Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal (GI) Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Christopher Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver
| | | | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Daniel J Sargent
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Joseph Willis
- Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jennifer Clark
- ASCP Institute for Science, Technology, and Policy, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC
| | - Carol Colasacco
- Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | | | | | - Christina B Ventura
- Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | - Jan A Nowak
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sepulveda AR, Hamilton SR, Allegra CJ, Grody W, Cushman-Vokoun AM, Funkhouser WK, Kopetz SE, Lieu C, Lindor NM, Minsky BD, Monzon FA, Sargent DJ, Singh VM, Willis J, Clark J, Colasacco C, Rumble RB, Temple-Smolkin R, Ventura CB, Nowak JA. Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 2017; 147:221-260. [PMID: 28165529 PMCID: PMC7263311 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens. Methods: The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted. Results: Twenty-one guideline statements were established. Conclusions: Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia R. Sepulveda
- From theDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY; Departments of
| | | | - Carmen J. Allegra
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville
| | - Wayne Grody
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pediatrics, and Human Genetics UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - William K. Funkhouser
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill
| | | | - Christopher Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver
| | | | - Bruce D. Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | | | | | - Joseph Willis
- Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jennifer Clark
- ASCP Institute for Science, Technology, and Policy, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC
| | - Carol Colasacco
- Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | | | | | - Christina B. Ventura
- Laboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | - Jan A. Nowak
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sepulveda AR, Hamilton SR, Allegra CJ, Grody W, Cushman-Vokoun AM, Funkhouser WK, Kopetz SE, Lieu C, Lindor NM, Minsky BD, Monzon FA, Sargent DJ, Singh VM, Willis J, Clark J, Colasacco C, Rumble RB, Temple-Smolkin R, Ventura CB, Nowak JA. Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:1453-1486. [PMID: 28165299 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.71.9807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 208] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Molecular testing of colorectal cancers (CRCs) to improve patient care and outcomes of targeted and conventional therapies has been the center of many recent studies, including clinical trials. Evidence-based recommendations for the molecular testing of CRC tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) -targeted therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens are warranted in clinical practice. The purpose of this guideline is to develop evidence-based recommendations to help establish standard molecular biomarker testing for CRC through a systematic review of the literature. Methods The American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), College of American Pathologists (CAP), Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help establish standard molecular biomarker testing, guide targeted therapies, and advance personalized care for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included over 4,000 articles was conducted to gather data to inform this guideline. Results Twenty-one guideline statements (eight recommendations, 10 expert consensus opinions and three no recommendations) were established. Recommendations Evidence supports mutational testing for genes in the EGFR signaling pathway, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize molecular testing for predictive and prognostic molecular biomarkers involve selection of assays, type of specimens to be tested, timing of ordering of tests and turnaround time for testing results. Additional information is available at: www.asco.org/CRC-markers-guideline and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia R Sepulveda
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Stanley R Hamilton
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Carmen J Allegra
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Wayne Grody
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Allison M Cushman-Vokoun
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - William K Funkhouser
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Scott E Kopetz
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Christopher Lieu
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Noralane M Lindor
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Federico A Monzon
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Daniel J Sargent
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Veena M Singh
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Joseph Willis
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Jennifer Clark
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Carol Colasacco
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - R Bryan Rumble
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Robyn Temple-Smolkin
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Christina B Ventura
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Jan A Nowak
- Antonia R. Sepulveda, Columbia University, New York, NY; Stanley R. Hamilton, Scott E. Kopetz, and Bruce D. Minsky, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville, FL; Wayne Grody, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; William K. Funkhouser, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Christopher Lieu, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO; Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Federico A. Monzon, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX; Daniel J. Sargent, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Veena M. Singh, Biocept, San Diego, CA; Joseph Willis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Jennifer Clark, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC; Carol Colasacco and Christina B. Ventura, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; R. Bryan Rumble, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD; and Jan A. Nowak, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gasdermin C Is Upregulated by Inactivation of Transforming Growth Factor β Receptor Type II in the Presence of Mutated Apc, Promoting Colorectal Cancer Proliferation. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0166422. [PMID: 27835699 PMCID: PMC5105946 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2016] [Accepted: 10/30/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Mutations in TGFBR2, a component of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling pathway, occur in high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC). In mouse models, Tgfbr2 inactivation in the intestinal epithelium accelerates the development of malignant intestinal tumors in combination with disruption of the Wnt-β-catenin pathway. However, no studies have further identified the genes influenced by TGFBR2 inactivation following disruption of the Wnt-β-catenin pathway. We previously described CDX2P-G19Cre;Apcflox/flox mice, which is stochastically null for Apc in the colon epithelium. In this study, we generated CDX2P-G19Cre;Apcflox/flox;Tgfbr2flox/flox mice, with simultaneous loss of Apc and Tgfbr2. These mice developed tumors, including adenocarcinoma in the proximal colon. We compared gene expression profiles between tumors of the two types of mice using microarray analysis. Our results showed that the expression of the murine homolog of GSDMC was significantly upregulated by 9.25-fold in tumors of CDX2P-G19Cre;Apcflox/flox;Tgfbr2flox/flox mice compared with those of CDX2P-G19Cre;Apcflox/flox mice. We then investigated the role of GSDMC in regulating CRC tumorigenesis. The silencing of GSDMC led to a significant reduction in the proliferation and tumorigenesis of CRC cell lines, whereas the overexpression of GSDMC enhanced cell proliferation. These results suggested that GSDMC functioned as an oncogene, promoting cell proliferation in colorectal carcinogenesis. In conclusion, combined inactivation of both Apc and Tgfbr2 in the colon epithelium of a CRC mouse model promoted development of adenocarcinoma in the proximal colon. Moreover, GSDMC was upregulated by TGFBR2 mutation in CRC and promoted tumor cell proliferation in CRC carcinogenesis, suggesting that GSDMC may be a promising therapeutic target.
Collapse
|
20
|
Silva P, Albuquerque C, Lage P, Fontes V, Fonseca R, Vitoriano I, Filipe B, Rodrigues P, Moita S, Ferreira S, Sousa R, Claro I, Nobre Leitão C, Chaves P, Dias Pereira A. Serrated polyposis associated with a family history of colorectal cancer and/or polyps: The preferential location of polyps in the colon and rectum defines two molecular entities. Int J Mol Med 2016; 38:687-702. [PMID: 27430658 PMCID: PMC4990292 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2015] [Accepted: 03/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Serrated polyposis (SPP) is characterized by the development of multiple serrated polyps and an increased predisposition to colorectal cancer (CRC). In the present study, we aimed to characterize, at a clinical and molecular level, a cohort of SPP patients with or without a family history of SPP and/or polyps/CRC (SPP-FHP/CRC). Sixty-two lesions from 12 patients with SPP-FHP/CRC and 6 patients with sporadic SPP were included. The patients with SPP-FHP/CRC presented with an older mean age at diagnosis (p=0.027) and a more heterogeneous histological pattern of lesions (p=0.032) than the patients with sporadic SPP. We identified two molecular forms of SPP-FHP/CRC, according to the preferential location of the lesions: proximal/whole-colon or distal colon. Mismatch repair (MMR) gene methylation [mutS homolog 6 (MSH6)/mutS homolog 3 (MSH3)] or loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of D2S123 (flanking MSH6) were detected exclusively in the former (p=3.0×10−7), in most early lesions. Proximal/whole-colon SPP-FHP/CRC presented a higher frequency of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation/LOH, microsatel-lite instability (MSI) and Wnt mutations (19/29 vs. 7/17; 16/23 vs. 1/14, p=2.2×10−4; 15/26 vs. 2/15, p=0.006; 14/26 vs. 4/20, p=0.02) but a lower frequency of B-raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) mutations (7/30 vs. 12/20, p=0.0089) than the distal form. CRC was more frequent in cases of Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS)-associated proximal/whole-colon SPP-FHP/CRC than in the remaining cases (4/4 vs. 1/8, p=0.01). Thus, SPP-FHP/CRC appears to be a specific entity, presenting two forms, proximal/whole-colon and distal, which differ in the underlying tumor initiation pathways. Early MGMT and MMR gene deficiency in the former may underlie an inherited susceptibility to genotoxic stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrícia Silva
- Molecular Pathobiology Research Unit (UIPM), Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Cristina Albuquerque
- Molecular Pathobiology Research Unit (UIPM), Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Pedro Lage
- Gastroenterology Service, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vanessa Fontes
- Molecular Pathobiology Research Unit (UIPM), Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ricardo Fonseca
- Pathology Service, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Inês Vitoriano
- Molecular Pathobiology Research Unit (UIPM), Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Bruno Filipe
- Molecular Pathobiology Research Unit (UIPM), Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Paula Rodrigues
- Familial Cancer Risk Clinic, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Susana Moita
- Molecular Pathobiology Research Unit (UIPM), Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sara Ferreira
- Gastroenterology Service, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rita Sousa
- Gastroenterology Service, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Isabel Claro
- Gastroenterology Service, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carlos Nobre Leitão
- Gastroenterology Service, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Paula Chaves
- Pathology Service, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - António Dias Pereira
- Gastroenterology Service, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG, EPE), Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kumamoto K, Ishida H, Suzuki O, Tajima Y, Chika N, Kuwabara K, Ishibashi K, Saito K, Nagata K, Eguchi H, Tamaru J, Iwama T. Lower prevalence of Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients in a Japanese hospital-based population. Surg Today 2015; 46:713-20. [PMID: 26249337 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-015-1232-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2015] [Accepted: 07/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of Lynch syndrome among Japanese patients with surgically resected colorectal cancer at a single institution. METHODS Of 616 colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical operation in our institution from January 2005 to August 2010, immunohistochemistry analyses for mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) and microsatellite instability (MSI) testing for surgically resected, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer specimens from 138 colorectal cancer patients under 60 years of age were undertaken. Hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter and BRAF mutation were analyzed where necessary. RESULTS Seven patients were identified as candidates for genetic testing by mismatch repair protein loss (n = 7) or MSI-H (n = 6). Methylation of MLH1 was detected in one case. Three patients were diagnosed with Lynch syndrome, comprising 2.2 % of the total colorectal cancer patients younger than 60 years of age. CONCLUSION The prevalence of Lynch syndrome among hospital-based diagnosed cancer patients may therefore be lower than expected in Japan compared with Western populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kensuke Kumamoto
- Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, 350-8550, Japan.
- Department of Organ Regulatory Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
| | - Hideyuki Ishida
- Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, 350-8550, Japan
| | - Okihide Suzuki
- Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, 350-8550, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tajima
- Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, 350-8550, Japan
| | - Noriyasu Chika
- Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, 350-8550, Japan
| | - Koki Kuwabara
- Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, 350-8550, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Ishibashi
- Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, 350-8550, Japan
| | - Katsuharu Saito
- Department of Organ Regulatory Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan
| | - Koji Nagata
- Department of Pathology, Saitama International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan
| | - Hidetaka Eguchi
- Division of Translational Research, Research Center for Genomic Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, 350-1241, Japan
| | - Junichi Tamaru
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, 350-8550, Japan
| | - Takeo Iwama
- Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, 350-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kim SJ, Kim HR, Kim SH, Han JH, Cho YB, Yun SH, Lee WY, Kim HC. hMLH1 promoter methylation and BRAF mutations in high-frequency microsatellite instability colorectal cancers not fulfilling the revised Bethesda guidelines. Ann Surg Treat Res 2014; 87:123-30. [PMID: 25247165 PMCID: PMC4170578 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2014.87.3.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2014] [Revised: 05/07/2014] [Accepted: 05/08/2014] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Sporadic colorectal cancers with high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H) are related to hypermethylation of mismatch repair (MMR) genes and a higher frequency of BRAF mutations than Lynch syndrome. We estimated the feasibility of hereditary colorectal cancer based on hMLH1 methylation and BRAF mutations. METHODS Between May 2005 and June 2011, we enrolled all 33 analyzed patients with MSI-H cancer (male:female, 23:10; mean age, 65.5 ± 9.4 years) from a prospectively maintained database that didn't match Bethesda guidelines and who had results of hMLH1 methylation and BRAF mutations. RESULTS Among the 33 patients, hMLH1 promoter methylation was observed in 36.4% (n = 12), and was not significantly related with clinicopathologic variables, including MLH1 expression. BRAF mutations were observed in 33.3% of the patients (n = 11). Four of 11 and five of 22 patients with MSI-H colon cancers were BRAF mutation (+)/hMLH1 promoter methylation (-) or BRAF mutation (-)/hMLH1 promoter methylation (+). Of the 33 patients, 21.2% were BRAF mutation (+)/hMLH1 promoter methylation (+), indicating sporadic cancers. Seventeen patients (51.5%) were BRAF mutation (-)/hMLH1 promoter methylation (-), and suggested Lynch syndrome. CONCLUSION Patients with MSI-H colorectal cancers not fulfilling the Bethesda guidelines possibly have hereditary colorectal cancers. Adding tests of hMLH1 promoter methylation and BRAF mutations can be useful to distinguish them from sporadic colorectal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Jin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyoung Ran Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok Hyung Kim
- Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hye Han
- Center for Clinical Research, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Beom Cho
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Woo Yong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Cheol Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Xicola RM, Gagnon M, Clark JR, Carroll T, Gao W, Fernandez C, Mijic D, Rawson JB, Janoski A, Pusatcioglu CK, Rajaram P, Gluskin AB, Regan M, Chaudhry V, Abcarian H, Blumetti J, Cintron J, Melson J, Xie H, Guzman G, Emmadi R, Alagiozian-Angelova V, Kupfer SS, Braunschweig C, Ellis NA, Llor X. Excess of proximal microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer in African Americans from a multiethnic study. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20:4962-70. [PMID: 25013126 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE African Americans (AA) have the highest incidence of colorectal cancer compared with other U.S. populations and more proximal colorectal cancers. The objective is to elucidate the basis of these cancer disparities. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Of note, 566 AA and 328 non-Hispanic White (NHW) colorectal cancers were ascertained in five Chicago hospitals. Clinical and exposure data were collected. Microsatellite instability (MSI) and BRAF (V600E) and KRAS mutations were tested. Statistical significance of categorical variables was tested by the Fisher exact test or logistic regression and age by the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS Over a 10-year period, the median age at diagnosis significantly decreased for both AAs (68-61; P < 0.01) and NHWs (64.5- 62; P = 0.04); more AA patients were diagnosed before age 50 than NHWs (22% vs. 15%; P = 0.01). AAs had more proximal colorectal cancer than NHWs (49.5% vs. 33.7%; P < 0.01), but overall frequencies of MSI, BRAF and KRAS mutations were not different nor were they different by location in the colon. Proximal colorectal cancers often presented with lymphocytic infiltrate (P < 0.01) and were diagnosed at older ages (P = 0.02). Smoking, drinking, and obesity were less common in this group, but results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Patients with colorectal cancer have gotten progressively younger. The excess of colorectal cancer in AAs predominantly consists of more proximal, microsatellite stable tumors, commonly presenting lymphocytic infiltrate and less often associated with toxic exposures or a higher BMI. Younger AAs had more distal colorectal cancers than older ones. These data suggest two different mechanisms driving younger age and proximal location of colorectal cancers in AAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa M Xicola
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Molly Gagnon
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Julia R Clark
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Weihua Gao
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Dragana Mijic
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Maureen Regan
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Hui Xie
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Grace Guzman
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Xavier Llor
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Molecular heterogeneity and prognostic implications of synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia. Br J Cancer 2014; 110:1228-35. [PMID: 24434431 PMCID: PMC3950856 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2013] [Revised: 12/12/2013] [Accepted: 12/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether synchronous colorectal cancers (S-CRCs) preferentially develop through widespread DNA methylation and whether they have a prognosis worse than solitary CRC. As tumours with microsatellite instability (MSI) may confound the effect of S-CRC methylation on outcome, we addressed this issue in a series of CRC characterised by BRAF and MS status. METHODS Demographics, clinicopathological records and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed in 881 consecutively resected CRC undergoing complete colonoscopy. All tumours were typed for BRAF(c.1799T>A) mutation and MS status, followed by search of germ-line mutation in patients with MSI CRC. RESULTS Synchronous colorectal cancers (50/881, 5.7%) were associated with stage IV microsatellite-stable (MSS) CRC (19/205, 9.3%, P=0.001) and with HNPCC (9/32, 28%, P<0.001). BRAF mutation (60/881, 6.8%) was associated with sporadic MSI CRC (37/62, 60%, P<0.001) but not with S-CRC (3/50, 6.0%, P=0.96). Synchronous colorectal cancer (HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.15-2.87; P=0.01), synchronous advanced adenoma (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.27-2.58; P=0.001), and BRAF(c.1799T>A) mutation (HR 2.16; 95% CI 1.25-3.73; P=0.01) were stage-independent predictors of death from MSS CRC. Disease-specific survival of MSI CRC patients was not affected by S-CRC (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.09-5.75; P=0.77). CONCLUSION Microsatellite-stable CRCs have a worse prognosis if S-CRC or synchronous advanced adenoma are diagnosed. The occurrence and the enhanced aggressiveness of synchronous MSS advanced neoplasia are not associated with BRAF mutation.
Collapse
|
25
|
Oh JR, Kim DW, Lee HS, Lee HE, Lee SM, Jang JH, Kang SB, Ku JL, Jeong SY, Park JG. Microsatellite instability testing in Korean patients with colorectal cancer. Fam Cancer 2013; 11:459-66. [PMID: 22669410 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9536-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing is useful for identifying patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and detecting sporadic colorectal cancer that develops through replication error pathways. A pentaplex panel is recommended by the National Cancer Institute for MSI testing, but simplified mononucleotide panels and immunohistochemistry of mismatch repair proteins are widely employed for convenience. This study was to evaluate the MSI status of colorectal cancer in Korean patients. This study included 1,435 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma subjected to surgical resection. The pentaplex Bethesda panel was used for MSI testing. Seventy nine (5.5 %) carcinomas were classified as MSI-high (MSI-H) and 95 (6.6 %) as MSI-low (MSI-L). BAT-26 and BAT-25 were unstable in 73 and 75 of 79 MSI-H carcinomas, respectively. With the panel comprising these 2 mononucleotide markers, 72 carcinomas were diagnosed as MSI-H, compared to the Bethesda panel data (72/79, 91.1 %). In contrast, BAT-26 or BAT-25 were unstable in only 7 (7.4 %) of the 95 MSI-L tumors. In the panel with 2 dinucleotide markers, D17250 linked to p53 and D2S123 to hMSH2, detection rates were 89.9 % (71/79) for MSI-H and 80.0 % (76/95) for MSI-L carcinomas, compared to the Bethesda panel. Moreover, we compared the frequency of MSI tumor in our patients with those reported previously from Western countries. In conclusion, the frequency of MSI-H appears lower in colorectal cancer patients in Korea. A simplified panel for MSI testing with BAT-26 and BAT-25 seems not effective for the accurate evaluation of MSI status, particularly in MSI-L colorectal carcinomas, in our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Ryul Oh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumi-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 463-707, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hile SE, Shabashev S, Eckert KA. Tumor-specific microsatellite instability: do distinct mechanisms underlie the MSI-L and EMAST phenotypes? Mutat Res 2012. [PMID: 23206442 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2012.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Microsatellite DNA sequences display allele length alterations or microsatellite instability (MSI) in tumor tissues, and MSI is used diagnostically for tumor detection and classification. We discuss the known types of tumor-specific MSI patterns and the relevant mechanisms underlying each pattern. Mutation rates of individual microsatellites vary greatly, and the intrinsic DNA features of motif size, sequence, and length contribute to this variation. MSI is used for detecting mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient tumors, which display an MSI-high phenotype due to genome-wide microsatellite destabilization. Because several pathways maintain microsatellite stability, tumors that have undergone other events associated with moderate genome instability may display diagnostic MSI only at specific di- or tetranucleotide markers. We summarize evidence for such alternative MSI forms (A-MSI) in sporadic cancers, also referred to as MSI-low and EMAST. While the existence of A-MSI is not disputed, there is disagreement about the origin and pathologic significance of this phenomenon. Although ambiguities due to PCR methods may be a source, evidence exists for other mechanisms to explain tumor-specific A-MSI. Some portion of A-MSI tumors may result from random mutational events arising during neoplastic cell evolution. However, this mechanism fails to explain the specificity of A-MSI for di- and tetranucleotide instability. We present evidence supporting the alternative argument that some A-MSI tumors arise by a distinct genetic pathway, and give examples of DNA metabolic pathways that, when altered, may be responsible for instability at specific microsatellite motifs. Finally, we suggest that A-MSI in tumors could be molecular signatures of environmental influences and DNA damage. Importantly, A-MSI occurs in several pre-neoplastic inflammatory states, including inflammatory bowel diseases, consistent with a role of oxidative stress in A-MSI. Understanding the biochemical basis of A-MSI tumor phenotypes will advance the development of new diagnostic tools and positively impact the clinical management of individual cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne E Hile
- Department of Pathology, Gittlen Cancer Research Foundation, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Samion Shabashev
- Department of Pathology, Gittlen Cancer Research Foundation, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Kristin A Eckert
- Department of Pathology, Gittlen Cancer Research Foundation, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
The Correlation between Microsatellite Instability and the Features of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer in the North Part of Iran. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012; 2012:756263. [PMID: 23213329 PMCID: PMC3507153 DOI: 10.1155/2012/756263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2012] [Revised: 09/09/2012] [Accepted: 10/14/2012] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between MSI and sporadic colorectal cancer in Guilan province, North part of Iran.
Materials and Methods. A total of 96 patients who underwent resection for sporadic colorectal cancer in Guilan province were studied. No patients had positive family history of cancers. The frequencies of MSI were analyzed by testing the BAT-26 and BAT-25 markers. Results. MSI analysis revealed that 22.9% of the tumors (22 patients) were microsatellite instability positive and 77.1% (74 patients) were microsatellite instability negative. The highest rate of MSI (40.9%) was found in the rectal region. MSI-H status was seen more frequently in distal tumors (P = 0.04, odds ratio = 3.13, 0.96–10.14). Conclusions. Distal tumor location and MSI may associate with special clinicopathological features. It seems that there may be correlation with underlying genetic and immunologic mechanisms.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kim HR, Kim HC, Yun HR, Kim SH, Park CK, Cho YB, Yun SH, Lee WY, Chun HK. An alternative pathway in colorectal carcinogenesis based on the mismatch repair system and p53 expression in Korean patients with sporadic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 20:4031-40. [PMID: 22732839 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2455-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2011] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Microsatellite instability (MSI) and chromosomal instability are main mechanisms underlying colorectal carcinogenesis. We determined the features and prognosis of colorectal cancer based on MSI including mismatch repair genes and expression of p53. METHODS Between 1999 and 2008, a total of 2,649 colorectal cancer patients were analyzed using a prospective database. A mismatch repair defect (MMR-D) was defined as a loss of expression of more than one MMR protein and/or MSI-high. MMR-proficiency (MMR-P) was defined as expression of all MMR proteins and microsatellite stable (MSS)/MSI-low. Groups 1 (G1), 2 (G2), 3 (G3), and 4 (G4) were defined as MMR-D and p53-positive expression, MMR-D and p53-negative expression, MMR-P and p53-positive expression, MMR-P and p53-negative expression, respectively. RESULTS Eighty-two (3.0%), 181 (6.8%), 1,368 (51.7%), and 1,018 (38.5%) patients were classified into groups 1-4, respectively. Comparison between G1 and G2 showed differences in location (p < 0.001), size (p = 0.030), node metastasis (p = 0.027), distant metastasis (p = 0.009), and stage (p = 0.040). Comparison between G3 and G4 showed differences in location (p < 0.001) and histology (p < 0.001). Comparison between G1 and G3 showed differences in location (p < 0.001) and histology (p < 0.001). Comparison between G2 and G4 showed differences in age (p < 0.001), location (p < 0.001), size (p = 0.006), histology (p < 0.001), node metastasis (p < 0.001), distant metastasis (p < 0.001), and stage (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, stage (p = 0.007) and histology (p < 0.001) were associated with improved overall survival, and stage (p < 0.001) was associated with disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS According to the MSI and p53 subsets, colorectal cancers showed different clinicopathologic features, but these subsets had no prognostic impact on overall and disease-free survival rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyoung Ran Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wang L, Tsutsumi S, Kawaguchi T, Nagasaki K, Tatsuno K, Yamamoto S, Sang F, Sonoda K, Sugawara M, Saiura A, Hirono S, Yamaue H, Miki Y, Isomura M, Totoki Y, Nagae G, Isagawa T, Ueda H, Murayama-Hosokawa S, Shibata T, Sakamoto H, Kanai Y, Kaneda A, Noda T, Aburatani H. Whole-exome sequencing of human pancreatic cancers and characterization of genomic instability caused by MLH1 haploinsufficiency and complete deficiency. Genome Res 2011; 22:208-19. [PMID: 22156295 DOI: 10.1101/gr.123109.111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Whole-exome sequencing (Exome-seq) has been successfully applied in several recent studies. We here sequenced the exomes of 15 pancreatic tumor cell lines and their matched normal samples. We captured 162,073 exons of 16,954 genes and sequenced the targeted regions to a mean coverage of 56-fold. This study identified a total of 1517 somatic mutations and validated 934 mutations by transcriptome sequencing. We detected recurrent mutations in 56 genes. Among them, 41 have not been described. The mutation rates varied widely among cell lines. The diversity of the mutation rates was significantly correlated with the distinct MLH1 copy-number status. Exome-seq revealed intensive genomic instability in a cell line with MLH1 homozygous deletion, indicated by a dramatically elevated rate of somatic substitutions, small insertions/deletions (indels), as well as indels in microsatellites. Notably, we found that MLH1 expression was decreased by nearly half in cell lines with an allelic loss of MLH1. While these cell lines were negative in conventional microsatellite instability assay, they showed a 10.5-fold increase in the rate of somatic indels, e.g., truncating indels in TP53 and TGFBR2, indicating MLH1 haploinsufficiency in the correction of DNA indel errors. We further analyzed the exomes of 15 renal cell carcinomas and confirmed MLH1 haploinsufficiency. We observed a much higher rate of indel mutations in the affected cases and identified recurrent truncating indels in several cancer genes such as VHL, PBRM1, and JARID1C. Together, our data suggest that MLH1 hemizygous deletion, through increasing the rate of indel mutations, could drive the development and progression of sporadic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linghua Wang
- Genome Science Division, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Luévano-González A, Guzmán AQ, Ancer Rodríguez J, Ortiz López R, Rojas Martínez A, González Guerrero JF, Flores Gutiérrez JP. Analysis of DNA mismatch repair proteins expression and BRAF V600E mutation in a subset of early- and late-onset colorectal carcinoma patients in Mexico. Arch Med Res 2011; 42:457-62. [PMID: 21945875 DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2011.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2011] [Accepted: 08/18/2011] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS A third of colorectal carcinomas (CRC) affect patients <50 years of age. Fifteen percent of CRC cases with microsatellite instability are due to inherited germ-line mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. The rest have an epigenetic hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter in whom the BRAF V600E mutation is a common hallmark. Immunohistochemistry helps to classify colorectal cancers with 100% specificity and 92% sensitivity. We undertook this study to determine if age is a risk factor for defective MMR protein expression and BRAF mutations in our population and to compare these results with the histopathological tumor features. METHODS Immunohistochemistry for MLH1 and MSH2 and RT-PCR BRAF V600E mutation was performed on tissue specimens from 57 patients <50 years of age. Data on age, gender, tumor location, histology, depth of infiltration, and the presence of metastatic lymph nodes were collected. Forty eight patients >50 years of age were used as a control group. A statistical analysis using ANOVA, χ(2), and Spearman's rho test were performed. RESULTS Absent MMR protein expression was more prevalent in patients <50 years of age. No BRAF V600E mutations were detected in either group. Medullary and mucinous types were more prevalent among young patients, whereas intestinal type was more frequent in older patients (p = 0.0008). No differences were found regarding clinicopathological stages between groups. CONCLUSIONS We found an association between young age and defective MMR expression. No V600E BRAF mutations were detected in either group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arturo Luévano-González
- Anatomic Pathology and Cytopathology, Hospital Universitario Dr José E. González, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Quality assessment and correlation of microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical markers among population- and clinic-based colorectal tumors results from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. J Mol Diagn 2011; 13:271-81. [PMID: 21497289 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2010.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2010] [Revised: 12/13/2010] [Accepted: 12/22/2010] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The detection of defective mismatch repair (MMR), as assessed by the presence of tumor microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or loss of MMR protein expression by IHC, has been useful for risk assessment, prognosis, and prediction of treatment in patients with colorectal cancer. We analyzed tumors for the presence of defective MMR from 5927 Colorectal Cancer Family Registry patients recruited at six international consortium sites. We evaluated the appropriate percentage instability cutoff used to distinguish the three MSI phenotypes [ie, stable (MSS), low instability (MSI-L), and high instability (MSI-H)]; the sensitivity, specificity, and performance characteristics of individual markers; and the concordance between MSI and IHC phenotypes. Guided by the results of the IHC testing, our findings indicate that the distinction between an MSI-H phenotype from a low-instability or MSS phenotype can best be accomplished by using a cutoff of 30% or greater of the markers showing instability. The sensitivity and specificity of the mononucleotide markers were higher than those of the dinucleotide markers. Specifically, BAT26 and BAT25 had the highest sensitivity (94%) and specificity (98%), and the use of mononucleotide markers alone identified 97% of the MSI-H cases correctly. As expected, the presence of MSI-H correlated with an older age of diagnosis, the presence of tumor in the proximal colon, and female sex.
Collapse
|
32
|
Pino MS, Chung DC. Microsatellite instability in the management of colorectal cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 5:385-99. [PMID: 21651356 DOI: 10.1586/egh.11.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a form of genetic instability caused by alterations in the DNA mismatch repair system. Approximately 15% of colorectal cancers display MSI due to a germline mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2) or to epigenetic silencing of MLH1. Colorectal cancers with MSI have distinctive features, including a tendency to arise in the proximal colon, poor differentiation, lymphocytic infiltration and mucinous or signet-ring histology. Patients with MSI tumors appear to have a better prognosis than those with microsatellite stable tumors, but curiously the responses to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimens are poorer with MSI tumors. Preliminary data suggest possible advantages of irinotecan-based regimens, but these findings need validation in well-designed clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria S Pino
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Janavicius R, Matiukaite D, Jakubauskas A, Griskevicius L. Microsatellite instability detection by high-resolution melting analysis. Clin Chem 2010; 56:1750-7. [PMID: 20852132 DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.150680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microsatellite instability (MSI) is an important marker for screening for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) as well as a prognostic and predictive marker for sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC). The mononucleotide microsatellite marker panel is a well-established and superior alternative to the traditional Bethesda MSI analysis panel, and does not require testing for corresponding normal DNA. The most common MSI detection techniques-fluorescent capillary electrophoresis and denaturing HPLC (DHPLC)-both have advantages and drawbacks. A new high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis method enables rapid identification of heteroduplexes in amplicons by their lower thermal stability, a technique that overcomes the main shortcomings of capillary electrophoresis and DHPLC. METHODS We investigated the straightforward application of HRM for the detection of MSI in 70 archival CRC samples. HRM analysis for 2 MSI markers (BAT25 and BAT26) was evaluated, and 2 different HRM-enabled instruments were compared-the LightCycler® 480 (Roche Diagnostics) and the LightScanner(TM) (Idaho Technology). We also determined the analytical sensitivity and specificity of the HRM assay on both instruments using 11 known MSI-positive and 54 microsatellite-stable CRC samples. RESULTS All MSI-positive samples were detected on both instruments (100% analytical sensitivity). The LightScanner performed better for analytical specificity, giving a combined specificity value of 99.1% compared with 92.3% on the LightCycler 480. CONCLUSIONS We expanded the application of the HRM analysis method as an effective MSI detection technique for clinical samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramunas Janavicius
- Department of Molecular and Regenerative Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Transfusion Medicine Center, Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS), or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome, accounting for approximately 2-5% of all newly diagnosed cases of CRC. Patients with LS have an increased lifetime risk of colorectal (52.2% in women and 68.7% in men) and endometrial cancer (15-70%), as well as certain extra-colonic cancers. Germline mutations in one of several DNA mismatch repair genes underlie LS. Molecular testing has emerged as an indispensable strategy for the diagnosis of LS. The diagnostic work-up of at-risk individuals includes a careful family history evaluation, microsatellite instability, immunohistochemistry and germline DNA analysis. A positive test result can guide clinicians in formulating the appropriate screening, surveillance and management strategies. However, because of the absence of an overt phenotype, such as a diffuse polyposis, it is not always straightforward to recognize LS clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria S Pino
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Daniel C Chung
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Four novel germline mutations in the MLH1 and PMS2 mismatch repair genes in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24:885-93. [PMID: 19479271 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0731-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/13/2009] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is the most common cause of early onset hereditary colorectal cancer. In the majority of HNPCC families, microsatellite instability (MSI) and germline mutation in one of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes are found. MATERIALS AND METHODS The entire coding sequence of MMR genes (MLH1, MLH2, MLH6, and PMS2) was analyzed using direct sequencing. Also, tumor tests were done as MSI and immunohistochemistry testing. RESULTS We were able to find three novel MLH1 and one novel PMS2 germline mutations in three Iranian HNPCC patients. The first was a transversion mutation c.346A>C (T116P) and happened in the highly conserved HATPase-c region of MLH1 protein. The second was a transversion mutation c.736A>T (I246L), which caused an amino acid change of isoleucine to leucine. The third mutation (c.2145,6 delTG) was frameshift and resulted in an immature stop codon in five codons downstream. All of these three mutations were detected in the MLH1 gene. The other mutation was a transition mutation, c.676G>A (G207E), which has been found in exon six of the PMS2 gene and caused an amino acid change of glycine to glutamic acid. MSI assay revealed high instability in microsatellite for two patients and microsatellite stable for one patient. CONCLUSION In all patients, an abnormal expression of the MMR proteins in HNPCC was related to the above novel mutations.
Collapse
|
36
|
Kim YH, Min BH, Choi HK, Kim SJ, Kim KM, Kim JY, Chang DK, Son HJ, Rhee PL, Kim JJ, Rhee JC, Chun HK. Sporadic colorectal carcinomas with low-level microsatellite instability in Korea: do they form a distinct subgroup with distinguished clinicopathological features? J Surg Oncol 2009; 99:351-5. [PMID: 19204939 DOI: 10.1002/jso.21239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The biologic significance of low-level microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancers (CRCs) remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate whether sporadic MSI-low CRCs in Korea displayed distinguished clinicopathological characteristics from microsatellite stable (MSS) and MSI-high CRCs. METHODS We consecutively enrolled 657 patients who underwent their first surgical resections for stage I-IV sporadic CRCs and compared their clinicopathological features and prognosis after resection according to MSI status (574 MSS, 30 MSI-low and 53 MSI-high CRCs). RESULTS When compared with MSS CRCs, MSI-low CRCs showed significantly more frequent association with poorly differentiated histology, mucinous carcinoma, and large tumour size. In addition, MSI-low CRCs demonstrated significantly less frequent lymph node metastasis and advanced tumour stage than MSS CRCs. When compared with MSI-high CRCs, MSI-low CRCs were significantly more frequently located in distal colon. Three-year overall and disease-free survival rates of MSS, MSI-low and MSI-high CRCs were 83.5%, 90.0% and 91.7% and 82.0%, 89.1% and 87.5%, respectively and neither demonstrated significant difference between three groups. CONCLUSIONS These results indicated that sporadic MSI-low CRCs in Korea displayed distinguished clinicopathological features and might form a distinct subgroup especially from MSS CRCs. Further large studies are required to evaluate the impact of MSI-low status on prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Ho Kim
- Department of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 35-710, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Søreide K, Nedrebø BS, Knapp JC, Glomsaker TB, Søreide JA, Kørner H. Evolving molecular classification by genomic and proteomic biomarkers in colorectal cancer: Potential implications for the surgical oncologist. Surg Oncol 2009; 18:31-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2008] [Revised: 06/13/2008] [Accepted: 06/16/2008] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
38
|
Analysis of genomic instability in adult-onset celiac disease patients by microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 20:1159-66. [PMID: 18946361 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0b013e3283094ee9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Malignant complications of celiac disease (CD) include carcinomas and lymphomas. The genetic basis behind cancer development in CD is not known, but acquisition of genetic abnormalities and genomic instability has been involved. The aim of this study was to explore molecular characteristics of genomic instability in CD patients by analyzing microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of heterozygosis (LOH) with carefully selected microsatellites. METHODS We genotyped small bowel biopsies and peripheral blood samples from 20 untreated CD patients using five microsatellites related to MMR genes (panel A), and five repeats associated with tumor suppressor genes, chromosome instability, inflammation, and cancer (panel B). RESULTS Genomic instability was found in seven out of 20 (35%) cases at: D5S107, D18S58, GSTP, TP53 or DCC, being TP53 the most frequently affected (five out of seven cases; 71%). Microsatellite alterations were significantly found using panel B markers (P=0.04). No cases with high frequency of MSI and replication error phenotype were detected. Only one case displayed MSI-L alone. Three patients exhibited LOH and three other cases showed LOH with low level of MSI, being classified as having chromosome instability phenotype. CONCLUSION Two novel observations were found in this study: first, the finding that non-neoplastic cells from a group of untreated CD patients present genomic instability at nucleotide level; and second, the advantage to use carefully selected microsatellites to identify celiac patients with molecular instability. Our data support the existence of chromosome instability phenotype in CD, suggesting that stable and unstable patients are genomically distinct subtypes that may follow a different evolution.
Collapse
|
39
|
Mahdavinia M, Bishehsari F, Verginelli F, Cumashi A, Lattanzio R, Sotoudeh M, Ansari R, Semeraro D, Hormazdi M, Fakheri H, Rakhshani N, De Lellis L, Curia MC, Cama A, Piantelli M, Malekzadeh R, Iacobelli S, Mariani-Costantini R. P53 mutations in colorectal cancer from northern Iran: Relationships with site of tumor origin, microsatellite instability and K-ras mutations. J Cell Physiol 2008; 216:543-50. [PMID: 18330889 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.21428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
CRC-associated P53 mutations have not been studied extensively in non-Western countries at relatively low CRC risk. We examined, for the first time, 196 paraffin-embedded CRC cases from Northern Iran for mutations in P53 exons 5-8 using PCR-direct sequencing. P53 status and mutation site/type were correlated with nuclear protein accumulation, clinicopathologic variables and data on K-ras mutations and high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H). We detected 96 P53 mutations in 87 (44.4%) cases and protein accumulation in 84 cases (42.8%). P53 mutations correlated directly with stage and inversely with MSI-H. Distal CRCs were more frequently mutated at major CpG hotspot codons [248 (8/66, 12.1%), 175 (7/66, 10.6%), and 245 (7/66, 10.6%)], while in proximal tumors codon 213, emerged as most frequently mutated (5/28, 17.9% vs. 3/66, 4.5%, P = 0.048). Transitions at CpGs, the most common mutation type, were more frequent in non-mucinous (25% vs. 10.4% in mucinous, P = 0.032), and distal CRC (27% vs. 12.5% in proximal, P = 0.02), and correlated with K-ras transversions. Transitions at non-CpGs, second most common P53 mutation, were more frequent in proximal tumors (15.6% vs. 4.7% in distal, P = 0.01), and correlated with K-ras transitions and MSI-H. Overall frequency and types of mutations and correlations with P53 accumulation, stage and MSI-H were as reported for non-Iranian patients. However P53 mutation site/type and correlations between P53 and K-ras mutation types differed between proximal and distal CRC. The codon 213 P53 mutation that recurred in proximal CRC was previously reported as frequent in esophageal cancer from Northern Iran.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahboobeh Mahdavinia
- Department of Oncology and Neurosciences, University G. d'Annunzio, and Center of Excellence on Aging (CeSI), G. d'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bishehsari F, Mahdavinia M, Malekzadeh R, Verginelli F, Catalano T, Sotoudeh M, Bazan V, Agnese V, Esposito DL, De Lellis L, Semeraro D, Colucci G, Hormazdi M, Rakhshani N, Cama A, Piantelli M, Iacobelli S, Russo A, Mariani-Costantini R. Patterns of K-ras mutation in colorectal carcinomas from Iran and Italy (a Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale study): influence of microsatellite instability status and country of origin. Ann Oncol 2008; 17 Suppl 7:vii91-6. [PMID: 16760302 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdl959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND K-ras mutations are a key step in colorectal cancer progression. Such mutations have been widely studied in case series from Western countries but there are few data on the rate and spectrum of mutations in tumors from countries where the epidemiological features of the disease are different. PATIENTS AND METHODS Tumor samples from 182 Iranian colorectal cancer patients (170 sporadic cases and 12 HNPCC cases) were screened for K-ras mutations at codons 12, 13 and 61 by sequencing analysis. The cases were also characterized for microsatellite instability at mononucleotide repeats by PCR and fragment analysis, and classified according to microsatellite instability status. The frequency and the spectrum of K-ras mutations were compared with those observed in a series of colorectal cancer patients from Italy. RESULTS K-ras mutations were observed in 68/182 (37.4%) cases. Mutation frequencies were similar in HNPCC-associated, sporadic MSI-H and sporadic microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors. However, the G13D substitution was more frequent in HNPCC (3/4, 75%) and sporadic MSI-H (7/11, 63.6%) tumors compared to sporadic MSS tumors (11/53, 20.4%) (P <0.01). Comparison of mutations in the two series from Iran and Italy showed a significantly higher frequency of G13D among Italian patients. CONCLUSIONS While the frequency of K-ras mutations could be similar, the mutational spectrum could be differentially influenced by genetic and environmental factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Bishehsari
- Department of Oncology and Neurosciences, University G. d'Annunzio, and Center of Excellence on Aging (CeSI), G. d'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Erdamar S, Ucaryilmaz E, Demir G, Karahasanoglu T, Dogusoy G, Dirican A, Goksel S. Importance of MutL homologue MLH1 and MutS homologue MSH2 expression in Turkish patients with sporadic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13:4437-44. [PMID: 17724798 PMCID: PMC4611575 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i33.4437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To assess the incidence of MLH1 (the human MutL homologue) and MSH2 (the human MutS homologue) protein expression in Turkish patients with sporadic colorectal cancers and to compare their survival and clinicopathological features.
METHODS: We validated the tissue microarray technology in 77 colorectal carcinomas by analyzing the immunohistochemical expression of proteins involved in two main pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis: p53 protein for loss of heterozygosity tumors; MLH1 and MSH2 proteins for microsatellite instability (MSI).
RESULTS: Our analysis showed that 29 (39.2%) had loss of MLH1 expression, 5 (6.8%) had loss of MSH2 expression and 2 cases had loss of expression of both proteins. We found that 60% of MSH2-negative tumors were located in the right side of the colon; all MSH2-negative cases were women. In addition, the loss of MSH2 expression was correlated with low p53 expression. Neither MLH1 nor MSH2 expressions were associated with prognosis, although there seemed a tendency of longer survival (71.7 ± 8.65 mo vs 47.08 ± 5.26 mo) for the patients with MLH1-negative versus MLH1-positive carcinomas. There were not significant differences in overall and recurrence-free survival among MLH1/MSH2-positive and -negative cases.
CONCLUSION: Our data supports that Turkish patients with MLH1- and MSH2-defective tumors have some distinct features from each other. Although prognostic importance remains controversial, immunohistochemical analysis of mismatch repair genes may be used as a routine histopathological examination of sporadic colorectal carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibel Erdamar
- Department of Pathology, Cerrahpasa Medical College, Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa 34303, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Malesci A, Laghi L, Bianchi P, Delconte G, Randolph A, Torri V, Carnaghi C, Doci R, Rosati R, Montorsi M, Roncalli M, Gennari L, Santoro A. Reduced likelihood of metastases in patients with microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13:3831-9. [PMID: 17606714 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-0366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 187] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The outcome of patients with colorectal cancer is more favorable when the tumor exhibits high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI). Although associated with earlier-stage tumors, MSI has been proposed as an independent predictor of survival. We tested the prognostic value of MSI in a large series of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in the last decade. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN The survival of 893 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer characterized by microsatellite status was analyzed. The 89 (10%) patients with MSI cancer were classified according to tumor mismatch repair (MMR) defect, MMR germ-line mutation, hMLH1 and p16 promoter methylation, BRAF and K-ras mutations, and frameshifts of target genes. RESULTS The colorectal cancer-specific survival was significantly (P = 0.02) better in patients with MSI cancer than in those with stable tumor (MSS). MSI did not predict a significantly lower risk of cancer-related death if tumor stage was included in the multivariate analysis [hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.40-1.29; P = 0.27]. Instead, MSI was strongly associated with a decreased likelihood of lymph node (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17-0.56; P < 0.001) and distant organ (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05-0.33; P < 0.001) metastases at diagnosis, independently of tumor pathologic features. Molecular predictors of reduced metastatic risk, and then of more favorable prognosis, included TGFbetaRII mutation for all MSI tumors, hMSH2 deficiency for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, and absence of p16 methylation for sporadic hMLH1-deficient cancers. CONCLUSIONS Tumor MSI is a stage-dependent predictor of survival in patients with colorectal cancer. The decreased likelihood of metastases in patients with MSI cancer is associated with specific genetic and epigenetic changes of the primary tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Malesci
- Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
McNiel EA, Griffin KL, Mellett AM, Madrill NJ, Mickelson JR. Microsatellite Instability in Canine Mammary Gland Tumors. J Vet Intern Med 2007. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2007.tb03061.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
44
|
Khilko N, Bourne P. Mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 may not play an essential role in breast carcinogenesis. Int J Surg Pathol 2007; 15:233-41. [PMID: 17652529 DOI: 10.1177/1066896907302116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Breast carcinoma is one of the most common malignancies in women, and its carcinogenesis is still unknown. The role of microsatellite instability (MSI) in breast carcinogenesis has been inconsistent in the literature. Here we studied the expression of 2 mismatch repair genes, hMLH1 and hMSH2, in 211 cases of intraductal (DCIS; 90 cases) and invasive ductal carcinoma (121 cases) of the breast by immunohistochemical analysis; and evaluated its relationship with cytokeratin (CK) subtypes, along with expression of ER-alpha (138 cases positive, 73 cases negative); PR (118 cases positive, 93 cases negative), and HER-2/neu (47 cases positive, 164 cases negative); and clinical features such as patient age (157 cases>50 years, 54 cases<50 years), tumor size (31 cases of IDC>2 cm, 90 cases of IDC<2 cm), tumor grade (87 cases high nuclear grade, 124 case non-high grade), and lymph node metastasis (38 cases of IDC positive, 74 cases of IDC negative, 9 cases of IDC with no available data on lymph node status). For CK subtypes, 167 cases were classified as luminal subtype (expressing CK8 and/or CK18, negative for CK5/6, CK14, and CK17) and 44 cases were classified as nonluminal (most of them belonged to basal/stem subtype, expressing CK5/6, and/or CK14, and/or CK17). No typical or atypical medullary carcinoma was included in this study. Our results showed that no loss of nuclear expression of either hMLH1 or hMSH2 was identified in any of the 211 cases of DCIS or IDC regardless of the various pathological and clinical factors, suggesting that hMLH1 or hMSH2 may not play an essential role in the majority of cases of the breast carcinoma.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/genetics
- Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/physiology
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/physiopathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/physiopathology
- DNA Mismatch Repair
- DNA, Neoplasm/genetics
- ErbB Receptors/genetics
- ErbB Receptors/physiology
- Female
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Humans
- Keratins/genetics
- Keratins/physiology
- Microsatellite Instability
- Middle Aged
- MutL Protein Homolog 1
- MutS Homolog 2 Protein/genetics
- MutS Homolog 2 Protein/physiology
- Nuclear Proteins/genetics
- Nuclear Proteins/physiology
- Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics
- Receptor, ErbB-2/physiology
- Receptors, Estrogen/genetics
- Receptors, Estrogen/physiology
- Receptors, Progesterone/genetics
- Receptors, Progesterone/physiology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalya Khilko
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mead LJ, Jenkins MA, Young J, Royce SG, Smith L, St John DJB, Macrae F, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Southey MC. Microsatellite instability markers for identifying early-onset colorectal cancers caused by germ-line mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13:2865-9. [PMID: 17504984 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-2174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing of colorectal cancer tumors is used as a screening tool to identify patients most likely to be mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation carriers. We wanted to examine which microsatellite markers currently used to detect MSI best predict early-onset colorectal cancer caused by germ-line mutations in MMR genes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Invasive primary tumors from a population-based sample of 107 cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed before age 45 years and tested for germ-line mutations in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 and MMR protein expression were screened for MSI using the National Cancer Institute panel and an expanded 10-microsatellite marker panel. RESULTS The National Cancer Institute five-marker panel system scored 31 (29%) as (NCI)MSI-High, 13 (12%) as (NCI)MSI-Low, and 63 (59%) as (NCI)MS-Stable. The 10-marker panel classified 18 (17%) as (10)MSI-High, 17 (16%) as (10)MSI-Low, and 72 (67%) as (10)MS-Stable. Of the 26 cancers that lacked the expression of at least one MMR gene, 24 (92%) were positive for some level of MSI (using either microsatellite panel). The mononucleotide repeats Bat26, Bat40, and Myb were unstable in all (10)MSI-High cancers and all MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers (100% sensitive). Bat40 and Bat25 were unstable in all tumors of MSH6 mutation carriers (100% sensitive). Bat40 was unstable in all MMR gene mutation carriers (100% sensitive). By incorporating seven mononucleotide repeats markers into the 10-marker panel, we were able to distinguish the carriers of MSH6 mutations (all scored (10)MSI-Low) from the MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers (all scored (10)MSI-High). CONCLUSIONS In early-onset colorectal cancer, a microsatellite panel containing a high proportion of mononuclear repeats can distinguish between tumors caused by MLH1 and MSH2 mutations from those caused by MSH6 mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leeanne J Mead
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Watson N, Grieu F, Morris M, Harvey J, Stewart C, Schofield L, Goldblatt J, Iacopetta B. Heterogeneous staining for mismatch repair proteins during population-based prescreening for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. J Mol Diagn 2007; 9:472-8. [PMID: 17652638 PMCID: PMC1975100 DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2007.060162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI(+)) in tumors from a population-based series of young colorectal cancer patients and its correlation with the loss of expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. The BAT-26 mononucleotide repeat was used to screen for MSI(+) in all colorectal cancers diagnosed in Western Australia throughout a 5-year period in patients <60 years of age. MSI(+) was found in 75 of 1003 (7.5%) cases, of which six contained a concomitant mutation in BRAF and were therefore excluded from further investigations as possible hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate expression of the four major MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) in the remaining 69 MSI(+) tumors. Complete loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expression or of MSH2 and MSH6 expression was found in 35 (51%) and 17 (25%) cases, respectively, whereas other patterns of complete loss were observed in eight cases (12%). Eight tumors (12%) were initially recorded as showing normal expression, but on review seven were reclassified as having abnormal staining because of heterogeneous patterns of MMR loss. Three of these seven cases had previously been found to have germline mutations. Because of possible misinterpretation of heterogeneous immunohistochemistry staining for MMR protein loss, MSI testing is recommended as the initial screen for population-based detection of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Watson
- School of Surgery and Pathology M507, University of Western Australia, Nedlands 6009, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Arai T, Kasahara I, Sawabe M, Kanazawa N, Kuroiwa K, Honma N, Aida J, Takubo K. Microsatellite-unstable mucinous colorectal carcinoma occurring in the elderly: comparison with medullary type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Pathol Int 2007; 57:205-12. [PMID: 17316416 DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2007.02082.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Mucinous carcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the large intestine have a high frequency of microsatellite instability, and their occurrence increases gradually with age. To elucidate the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of microsatellite-unstable mucinous carcinoma and compare the tumor with medullary type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, the clinicopathological status and expression of mucin core and hMLH1 proteins were studied in 15 microsatellite-unstable and 20 microsatellite-stable mucinous colorectal carcinomas occurring in elderly patients, and compared with 23 cases of medullary type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in which 21 cases were microsatellite-unstable. Thirteen (87%) of 15 microsatellite-unstable carcinomas exhibited absent hMLH1 expression compared with three (15%) of 20 microsatellite-stable carcinomas (P < 0.01). The proportion (87%) of positive MUC5AC expression in microsatellite-unstable mucinous carcinoma was significantly higher than that (45%) in microsatellite-stable mucinous carcinoma (P = 0.01). Compared with microsatellite-stable mucinous carcinoma, microsatellite-unstable mucinous carcinomas were significantly associated with a proximal location, intra- and peritumoral inflammatory cell infiltration, frequent MUC5AC expression, a low incidence of lymph node metastasis and absent hMLH1 protein expression, which is not different to medullary type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma except for MUC2 expression and age-related occurrence. These results suggest that microsatellite-unstable mucinous carcinoma occurring in the elderly shares clinicopathological and molecular features with medullary type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and that microsatellite instability with absent hMLH1 expression plays an important role in the development of these two carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomio Arai
- Department of Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Sakaecho, Tokyo, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Søreide K. Molecular Testing for Microsatellite Instability and DNA Mismatch Repair Defects in Hereditary and Sporadic Colorectal Cancers – Ready for Prime Time? Tumour Biol 2007; 28:290-300. [DOI: 10.1159/000110427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2007] [Accepted: 08/15/2007] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
|
49
|
Sengupta S, Chakrabarti S, Roy A, Panda CK, Roychoudhury S. Inactivation of human mutL homolog 1 and mutS homolog 2 genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumors and leukoplakia samples by promoter hypermethylation and its relation with microsatellite instability phenotype. Cancer 2007; 109:703-12. [PMID: 17219447 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) exhibits a microsatellite instability (MIN) phenotype. The authors correlated alterations in the mismatch-repair genes human mutL homolog 1 (hMLH1) and human mutS homolog 2 (hMSH2) in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tumors and in samples of leukoplakia with the MIN phenotype. METHODS One hundred twenty-three paired HNSCC normal and tumor tissues and 27 leukoplakia samples were examined for hypermethylation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 promoters. The hypermethylation status of the tissues was confirmed by expression studies. Sixty-three of 123 randomly selected tumors and all 27 leukplakia samples were genotyped with 8 microsatellite markers to determine MIN. RESULTS Fifty percent of HNSCC tumors and 63% of leukoplakia samples harbored hypermethylation at either or both hMLH1 and hMSH2 promoters. Normal tissues adjacent to methylation-positive tumors also demonstrated hypermethylation of both promoters at a high frequency (25%). A positive correlation between tobacco habit and promoter hypermethylation was observed (P = .001). A correlation was observed between MIN and the frequency of promoter hypermethylation in the leukoplakia samples, but no such trend was observed in the HNSCC tumors. It is noteworthy that patients who had a high frequency of MIN-positive tumors exhibited hypermethylation in both the affected tissues and the adjacent normal tissues (P = .007). Patients with a tobacco habit who had promoter hypermethylation at both the affected tissues and the adjacent normal tissues had tumors that mostly were MIN positive (P = .047). CONCLUSIONS The current results suggested that tobacco-addicted individuals are more susceptible to promoter hypermethylation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 and that, if such hypermethylation occurs in the normal squamous epithelium of the head and neck region, then those tissues are likely to develop into tumors that involve the MIN pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiladitya Sengupta
- Molecular and Human Genetics Division, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Blanes A, Diaz-Cano SJ. Complementary analysis of microsatellite tumor profile and mismatch repair defects in colorectal carcinomas. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12:5932-40. [PMID: 17009390 PMCID: PMC4124399 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i37.5932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a prognostic factor and a marker of deficient mismatch repair (MMR) in colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRC). However, a proper application of this marker requires understanding the following: (1) The MSI concept: The PCR approach must amplify the correct locus and accurately identify the microsatellite pattern in the patient’s normal tissue. MSI is demonstrated when the length of DNA sequences in a tumor differs from that of nontumor tissue. Any anomalous expansion or reduction of tandem repeats results in extra-bands normally located in the expected size range (100 bp, above or below the expected product), differ from the germline pattern by some multiple of the repeating unit, and must show appropriate stutter. (2) MSI mechanisms: MMR gene inactivation (by either mutation or protein down-regulation as frequently present in deep CRC compartments) leads to mutation accumulation in a cell with every cellular division, resulting in malignant transformation. These mechanisms can express tumor progression and result in a decreased prevalence of aneuploid cells and loss of the physiologic cell kinetic correlations in the deep CRC compartments. MSI molecular mechanisms are not necessarily independent from chromosomal instability and may coexist in a given CRC. (3) Because of intratumoural heterogeneity, at least two samples from each CRC should be screened, preferably from the superficial (tumor cells above the muscularis propria) and deep (tumor cells infiltrating the muscularis propria) CRC compartments to cover the topographic tumor heterogeneity. (4) Pathologists play a critical role in identifying microsatellite-unstable CRC, such as occur in young patients with synchronous or metachronous tumors or with tumors showing classic histologic features. In these cases, MSI testing and/or MMR immunohistochemistry are advisable, along with gene sequencing and genetic counseling if appropriate. MSI is an excellent functional and prognostically useful marker, whereas MMR immunohistochemistry can guide gene sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Blanes
- Department of Pathology, University of Malaga School of Medicine, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|