1
|
Park SS, Chan M, Velaiutham S, Vargas AC. Benign Adenomyoepithelioma: An Unrecognised Precursor of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in Patient With Lynch Syndrome. Int J Surg Pathol 2024; 32:1350-1356. [PMID: 38297508 DOI: 10.1177/10668969241226704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Currently, there is no robust evidence demonstrating a clear association between Lynch syndrome and non-malignant breast pathology such as adenomyoepithelioma. We report a case of benign breast adenomyoepithelioma, which after recurrence was associated with ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) in a 41-year-old woman with Lynch syndrome, who lacked significant family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Both, the adenomyoepithelioma and DCIS were found to have nuclear loss of MSH2/MSH6 by immunohistochemistry, while germline testing confirmed MSH2 gene mutation. Concordant loss of MSH2 in both lesions in the context of a MSH2 pathogenic variant in this patient with Lynch syndrome illustrates that the benign adenomyoepithelioma behaved as a likely precursor of DCIS. Our report provides a novel perspective that in some patients with Lynch syndrome adenomyoepithelioma may represent a pre-malignant precursor lesion of DCIS.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Female
- Adult
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/pathology
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/diagnosis
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/complications
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Adenomyoepithelioma/pathology
- Adenomyoepithelioma/diagnosis
- Adenomyoepithelioma/genetics
- Adenomyoepithelioma/surgery
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnosis
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/genetics
- MutS Homolog 2 Protein/genetics
- Precancerous Conditions/pathology
- Precancerous Conditions/genetics
- Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis
- Germ-Line Mutation
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Sw Park
- The Breast Centre, Gasteshead, Australia
- The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | | | | | - Ana Cristina Vargas
- Douglas Hanly Moir Pathology, North Ryde, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elghobashy M, Siafakas M, Elshafie M, Hejmadi R, Basu NN, Shaaban AM. An Unusual Presentation of Synchronous Breast Cancer and Skin Malignancy in a Patient with Lynch Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1242. [PMID: 38927449 PMCID: PMC11201021 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12061242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition that leads to an increased risk of many neoplasms. In the United Kingdom, NICE recommends that patients with colorectal and endometrial cancer should be tested for Lynch syndrome. There is conflicting evidence in the literature on the link between breast cancer and Lynch syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION A 54-year-old woman presented with a lump in her right breast with a background of locally advanced colorectal cancer and Lynch syndrome due to a MLH1 gene mutation. A core biopsy showed a grade 3, invasive, triple-negative NST carcinoma. The tumour was triple-negative with patchy positivity for CK14 and CK5/6. Simultaneously, a cystic skin lesion in the contralateral breast was noted, which comprised lesional cells with a proliferation of clear cells and bland basaloid cells. The lesion had evidence of sebaceous differentiation with AR, podoplanin and p63 positivity. MSH1 and PMS2 deficiency was found in the breast and skin lesions. CONCLUSIONS In Lynch syndrome, it is vital to be aware of the increased risk of various types of cancer. This case adds to the body of evidence of the spectrum of malignancies that can be encountered in patients with Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Siafakas
- South Birmingham Screening, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| | - Mona Elshafie
- Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| | - Rahul Hejmadi
- Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| | - Naren N. Basu
- Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| | - Abeer M. Shaaban
- Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
- Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Joo JE, Chu YL, Georgeson P, Walker R, Mahmood K, Clendenning M, Meyers AL, Como J, Joseland S, Preston SG, Diepenhorst N, Toner J, Ingle DJ, Sherry NL, Metz A, Lynch BM, Milne RL, Southey MC, Hopper JL, Win AK, Macrae FA, Winship IM, Rosty C, Jenkins MA, Buchanan DD. Intratumoral presence of the genotoxic gut bacteria pks + E. coli, Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis, and Fusobacterium nucleatum and their association with clinicopathological and molecular features of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:728-740. [PMID: 38200234 PMCID: PMC10912205 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02554-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate clinicopathological and molecular tumour features associated with intratumoral pks+ Escherichia coli (pks+E.coli+), pks+E.coli- (non-E.coli bacteria harbouring the pks island), Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF) and Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum). METHODS We screened 1697 tumour-derived DNA samples from the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry, Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study and the ANGELS study using targeted PCR. RESULTS Pks+E.coli+ was associated with male sex (P < 0.01) and APC:c.835-8 A > G somatic mutation (P = 0.03). The association between pks+E.coli+ and APC:c.835-8 A > G was specific to early-onset CRCs (diagnosed<45years, P = 0.02). The APC:c.835-A > G was not associated with pks+E.coli- (P = 0.36). F. nucleatum was associated with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd), BRAF:c.1799T>A p.V600E mutation, CpG island methylator phenotype, proximal tumour location, and high levels of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (Ps < 0.01). In the stratified analysis by MMRd subgroups, F. nucleatum was associated with Lynch syndrome, MLH1 methylated and double MMR somatic mutated MMRd subgroups (Ps < 0.01). CONCLUSION Intratumoral pks+E.coli+ but not pks+E.coli- are associated with CRCs harbouring the APC:c.835-8 A > G somatic mutation, suggesting that this mutation is specifically related to DNA damage from colibactin-producing E.coli exposures. F. nucleatum was associated with both hereditary and sporadic MMRd subtypes, suggesting the MMRd tumour microenvironment is important for F. nucleatum colonisation irrespective of its cause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihoon E Joo
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Yen Lin Chu
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Georgeson
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Romy Walker
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Khalid Mahmood
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Aaron L Meyers
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Julia Como
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Sharelle Joseland
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan G Preston
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Natalie Diepenhorst
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Julie Toner
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Danielle J Ingle
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Norelle L Sherry
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Metz
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Brigid M Lynch
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roger L Milne
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Aung Ko Win
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kaplan HG, Whiteaker JR, Nelson B, Ivey RG, Lorentzen TD, Voytovich U, Zhao L, Corwin DJ, Resta R, Paulovich AG. Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Sensitive to Pembrolizumab: Evidence of the Pathogenicity of the MLH1 Variant 1835del3. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:1110-1116. [PMID: 37643636 PMCID: PMC11051703 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
A woman with estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer developed progressive disease despite treatment with multiple hormonal and chemotherapeutic modalities. She carried a germline variant of MLH1 (1835del3), also known as c.1835_1837del and v612del, the pathogenicity of which has not been conclusively determined. MLH1 staining was not seen on immunohistochemical staining of her tumor tissue. The patient experienced a >5-year dramatic response to 4 doses of pembrolizumab. Family studies revealed multiple other relatives with the MLH1 1835del3 variant, as well as multiple relatives with colon cancer. The one relative with colon cancer who underwent genetic testing demonstrated the same variant. Laboratory studies revealed that the patient's tumor showed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the MLH1 region, high levels of microsatellite instability, and a high tumor mutational burden. LOH in the MLH1 region, along with the remarkable clinical response to pembrolizumab treatment and the presence of the same MLH1 variant in affected relatives, supports the hypothesis that the MLH1 1835del3 variant is pathogenic. Given the patient's family history, this likely represents an uncommon presentation of Lynch syndrome. Physicians should be alert to evaluate patients for targetable genetic variants even in unlikely clinical situations such as the one described here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Lei Zhao
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Elze L, van der Post RS, Vos JR, Mensenkamp AR, de Hullu MSC, Nagtegaal ID, Hoogerbrugge N, de Voer RM, Ligtenberg MJL. Microsatellite instability in noncolorectal and nonendometrial malignancies in patients with Lynch syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:853-860. [PMID: 37018159 PMCID: PMC10323896 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with Lynch syndrome are at increased hereditary risk of colorectal and endometrial carcinomas with microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and mismatch repair-deficiency (dMMR), which make these tumors vulnerable to therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Our aim is to assess how often other tumor types in these individuals share these characteristics. METHODS We retrieved the full tumor history of a historical clinic-based cohort of 1745 individuals with Lynch syndrome and calculated the standardized incidence ratio for all tumor types. MSI status, somatic second hit alterations, and immunohistochemistry-based MMR status were analyzed in 236 noncolorectal and nonendometrial malignant tumors. RESULTS In individuals with Lynch syndrome MSI-H/dMMR occurred both in Lynch-spectrum and in non-Lynch-spectrum malignancies (85% vs 37%, P < .01). MSI-H/dMMR malignancies were found in nearly all non-Lynch-spectrum tumor types. Almost all breast carcinomas had medullary features, and most of them were MSI-H/dMMR. Breast carcinoma with medullary features were shown to be associated with Lynch syndrome (standardized incidence ratio = 38.8, 95% confidence interval = 16.7 to 76.5). CONCLUSIONS In individuals with Lynch syndrome, MSI-H/dMMR occurs in more than one-half of the malignancies other than colorectal and endometrial carcinomas, including tumor types without increased incidence. The Lynch-spectrum tumors should be expanded to breast carcinomas with medullary features. All malignancies in patients with Lynch syndrome, independent of subtype, should be tested for MSI-H/dMMR in case therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors is considered. Moreover, Lynch syndrome should be considered an underlying cause of all MSI-H/dMMR malignancies other than colorectal and endometrial carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Elze
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rachel S van der Post
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Janet R Vos
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen R Mensenkamp
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam S C de Hullu
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Richarda M de Voer
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Genetic Considerations in the Locoregional Management of Breast Cancer: a Review of Current Evidence. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-023-00478-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|
7
|
Chevarin M, Alcantara D, Albuisson J, Collonge-Rame MA, Populaire C, Selmani Z, Baurand A, Sawka C, Bertolone G, Callier P, Duffourd Y, Jonveaux P, Bignon YJ, Coupier I, Cornelis F, Cordier C, Mozelle-Nivoix M, Rivière JB, Kuentz P, Thauvin C, Boidot R, Ghiringhelli F, O'Driscoll M, Faivre L, Nambot S. The "extreme phenotype approach" applied to male breast cancer allows the identification of rare variants of ATR as potential breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Oncotarget 2023; 14:111-125. [PMID: 36749285 PMCID: PMC9904323 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In oncogenetics, some patients could be considered as "extreme phenotypes", such as those with very early onset presentation or multiple primary malignancies, unusually high numbers of cancers of the same spectrum or rare cancer types in the same parental branch. For these cases, a genetic predisposition is very likely, but classical candidate gene panel analyses often and frustratingly remains negative. In the framework of the EX2TRICAN project, exploring unresolved extreme cancer phenotypes, we applied exome sequencing on rare familial cases with male breast cancer, identifying a novel pathogenic variant of ATR (p.Leu1808*). ATR has already been suspected as being a predisposing gene to breast cancer in women. We next identified 3 additional ATR variants in a cohort of both male and female with early onset and familial breast cancers (c.7762-2A>C; c.2078+1G>A; c.1A>G). Further molecular and cellular investigations showed impacts on transcripts for variants affecting splicing sites and reduction of ATR expression and phosphorylation of the ATR substrate CHEK1. This work further demonstrates the interest of an extended genetic analysis such as exome sequencing to identify very rare variants that can play a role in cancer predisposition in extreme phenotype cancer cases unexplained by classical cancer gene panels testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Chevarin
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Unité Fonctionnelle Innovation diagnostique dans les maladies rares, laboratoire de génétique chromosomique et moléculaire, Plateau Technique de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Diana Alcantara
- Human DNA Damage Response Disorders Group, University of Sussex, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Juliette Albuisson
- Service d’Oncogénétique, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
- Département de biologie et pathologie des tumeurs, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Céline Populaire
- Oncobiologie Génétique Bioinformatique, PCBio, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Zohair Selmani
- Oncobiologie Génétique Bioinformatique, PCBio, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Amandine Baurand
- Service d’Oncogénétique, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Caroline Sawka
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Geoffrey Bertolone
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Patrick Callier
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Unité Fonctionnelle Innovation diagnostique dans les maladies rares, laboratoire de génétique chromosomique et moléculaire, Plateau Technique de Biologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Médecine Translationnelle et Anomalies du Développement (FHU TRANSLAD), CHU Dijon Bourgogne et Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Yannis Duffourd
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Médecine Translationnelle et Anomalies du Développement (FHU TRANSLAD), CHU Dijon Bourgogne et Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Philippe Jonveaux
- Laboratoire de Génétique Médicale, INSERM U954, Hôpitaux de Brabois, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France
| | - Yves-Jean Bignon
- Laboratoire d’Oncologie Moléculaire, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - François Cornelis
- Université Bordeaux, IMB, UMR 5251, Talence, France
- Service d’imagerie diagnostique et interventionnelle de l’adulte, Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Jean-Baptiste Rivière
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Médecine Translationnelle et Anomalies du Développement (FHU TRANSLAD), CHU Dijon Bourgogne et Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Paul Kuentz
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Oncobiologie Génétique Bioinformatique, PCBio, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Médecine Translationnelle et Anomalies du Développement (FHU TRANSLAD), CHU Dijon Bourgogne et Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Christel Thauvin
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Romain Boidot
- Département de biologie et pathologie des tumeurs, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - François Ghiringhelli
- Département d’oncologie médicale, INSERM LNC U1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Marc O'Driscoll
- Human DNA Damage Response Disorders Group, University of Sussex, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Laurence Faivre
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Service d’Oncogénétique, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Médecine Translationnelle et Anomalies du Développement (FHU TRANSLAD), CHU Dijon Bourgogne et Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Sophie Nambot
- Inserm UMR 1231 GAD Génétique des Anomalies du Développement, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Service d’Oncogénétique, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
- Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Anomalies du Développement de l’Interrégion Est, Hôpital d’Enfants, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Médecine Translationnelle et Anomalies du Développement (FHU TRANSLAD), CHU Dijon Bourgogne et Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sokolova A, Johnstone KJ, McCart Reed AE, Simpson PT, Lakhani SR. Hereditary breast cancer: syndromes, tumour pathology and molecular testing. Histopathology 2023; 82:70-82. [PMID: 36468211 PMCID: PMC10953374 DOI: 10.1111/his.14808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
Hereditary factors account for a significant proportion of breast cancer risk. Approximately 20% of hereditary breast cancers are attributable to pathogenic variants in the highly penetrant BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. A proportion of the genetic risk is also explained by pathogenic variants in other breast cancer susceptibility genes, including ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D and BARD1, as well as genes associated with breast cancer predisposition syndromes - TP53 (Li-Fraumeni syndrome), PTEN (Cowden syndrome), CDH1 (hereditary diffuse gastric cancer), STK11 (Peutz-Jeghers syndrome) and NF1 (neurofibromatosis type 1). Polygenic risk, the cumulative risk from carrying multiple low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility alleles, is also a well-recognised contributor to risk. This review provides an overview of the established breast cancer susceptibility genes as well as breast cancer predisposition syndromes, highlights distinct genotype-phenotype correlations associated with germline mutation status and discusses molecular testing and therapeutic implications in the context of hereditary breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sokolova
- Sullivan and Nicolaides PathologyBrisbane
- Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of MedicineThe University of QueenslandBrisbane
| | - K J Johnstone
- Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of MedicineThe University of QueenslandBrisbane
- Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane and Women's HospitalBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - A E McCart Reed
- Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of MedicineThe University of QueenslandBrisbane
| | - P T Simpson
- Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of MedicineThe University of QueenslandBrisbane
| | - S R Lakhani
- Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of MedicineThe University of QueenslandBrisbane
- Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane and Women's HospitalBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Epithelial ovarian cancer: Review article. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2022; 33:100629. [PMID: 36127285 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer is the second commonest cause of death amongst all gynaecological cancers. Treatment is challenging because almost 75% of cases are diagnosed in advanced stages. Front line treatment with aggressive cytoreduction and adjuvant treatment decides the outcome. Despite the complete response to primary treatment majority will relapse with disease. Treatment options of recurrent disease depends on platinum free interval. Systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment and secondary cytoreduction may be beneficial in selected patients Newer therapeutic agents are being added in the front line and recurrent setting to improve outcome.
Collapse
|
10
|
Wieland J, Buchan S, Sen Gupta S, Mantzouratou A. Genomic instability and the link to infertility: A focus on microsatellites and genomic instability syndromes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 274:229-237. [PMID: 35671666 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Infertility is associated to multiple types of different genomic instabilities and is a genetic feature of genomic instability syndromes. While the mismatch repair machinery contributes to the maintenance of genome integrity, surprisingly its potential role in infertility is overlooked. Defects in mismatch repair mechanisms contribute to microsatellite instability and genomic instability syndromes, due to the inability to repair newly replicated DNA. This article reviews the literature to date to elucidate the contribution of microsatellite instability to genomic instability syndromes and infertility. The key findings presented reveal microsatellite instability is poorly researched in genomic instability syndromes and infertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Wieland
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK.
| | - Sarah Buchan
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK.
| | - Sioban Sen Gupta
- Institute for Women's Health, 86-96 Chenies Mews, University College London, London WC1E 6HX, UK.
| | - Anna Mantzouratou
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Joyon N, Guillaume Z, Ouafi L, Cotteret S, Rouleau E, Caron O, Goldbarg V, Lacroix-Triki M. Malignant Adenomyoepithelioma of the Breast: An Unexpected Malignancy in a Lynch Syndrome Patient. Int J Surg Pathol 2022:10668969221105623. [PMID: 35707990 DOI: 10.1177/10668969221105623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Natacha Joyon
- 46657Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Department of Pathology, Villejuif, France
| | - Zoe Guillaume
- 46657Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Department of Tumor Genetics, Villejuif, France.,46657Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Department of Medical Oncology, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Sophie Cotteret
- 46657Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Department of Tumor Genetics, Villejuif, France
| | - Etienne Rouleau
- 46657Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Department of Tumor Genetics, Villejuif, France
| | - Olivier Caron
- 46657Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Department of Tumor Genetics, Villejuif, France.,46657Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Department of Medical Oncology, Villejuif, France
| | - Veronica Goldbarg
- 46657Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Department of Medical Oncology, Villejuif, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hu L, Sun J, Li Z, Qu Z, Liu Y, Wan Q, Liu J, Ding X, Zang F, Zhang J, Yao L, Xu Y, Wang Y, Xie Y. Clinical relevance of pathogenic germline variants in mismatch repair genes in Chinese breast cancer patients. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:52. [PMID: 35449176 PMCID: PMC9023502 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00417-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevalence and clinical relevance of pathogenic germline variants in MMR genes have not been investigated in large series of breast cancers. In this study, we screened the germline variants in MMR genes in 8085 consecutive Chinese breast cancer patients, and investigated the MMR/PD-L1 protein expression and tumor mutation burden (TMB) of breast tumors from MMR variant carriers. We found that 15 of 8085 patients (0.19%) carried a pathogenic germline variant in MMR genes. Compared with non-carriers, MMR variant carriers might have worse recurrence-free survival (unadjusted hazard ratios [HR] = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.12-6.49, P = 0.027) and distant recurrence-free survival (unadjusted HR = 3.24, 95% CI: 1.45-7.22, P = 0.004). More importantly, some of the breast cancers from MMR carriers displayed MMR protein loss (5/13), TMB-high (2/10), and PD-L1 positive expression (9/13). This study showed that MMR variant carriers were rare in breast cancer. They might have worse survival and part of them might benefit from immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Hu
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Jie Sun
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Zhongwu Li
- Department of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Ziwei Qu
- Berry Oncology Corporation, 350200, Fujian, P. R. China
| | - Yan Liu
- Berry Oncology Corporation, 350200, Fujian, P. R. China
| | - Qiting Wan
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Jiaming Liu
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Xinyun Ding
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Fan Zang
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Juan Zhang
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Lu Yao
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Ye Xu
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Yin Wang
- Berry Oncology Corporation, 350200, Fujian, P. R. China.
| | - Yuntao Xie
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kostov S, Watrowski R, Kornovski Y, Dzhenkov D, Slavchev S, Ivanova Y, Yordanov A. Hereditary Gynecologic Cancer Syndromes - A Narrative Review. Onco Targets Ther 2022; 15:381-405. [PMID: 35422633 PMCID: PMC9005127 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s353054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Hereditary cancer syndromes are defined as syndromes, where the genetics of cancer are the result of low penetrant polymorphisms or of a single gene disorder inherited in a mendelian fashion. During the last decade, compelling evidence has accumulated that approximately 5-10% of all cancers could be attributed to hereditary cancer syndromes. A tremendous progress has been made over the last decade in the evaluation and management of these syndromes. However, hereditary syndromes associated with gynecologic malignancies still present significant challenge for oncogynecologists. Oncogynecologists tend to pay more attention to staging, histological type and treatment options of gynecological cancers than thinking of inherited cancers and taking a detailed family history. Moreover, physicians should also be familiar with screening strategies in patients with inherited gynecological cancers. Lynch syndrome and hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome are the most common and widely discussed syndromes in medical literature. The aim of the present review article is to delineate and emphasize the majority of hereditary gynecological cancer syndromes, even these, which are rarely reported in oncogynecology. The following inherited cancers are briefly discussed: Lynch syndrome; "site-specific" ovarian cancer and hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome; Cowden syndrome; Li-Fraumeni syndrome; Peutz-Jeghers syndrome; ataxia-telangiectasia; DICER1- syndrome; gonadal dysgenesis; tuberous sclerosis; multiple endocrine neoplasia type I, II; hereditary small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type and hereditary undifferentiated uterine sarcoma; hereditary diffuse gastric cancer and MUTYH-associated polyposis. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, pathology and screening of these syndromes are discussed. General treatment recommendations are beyond the scope of this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stoyan Kostov
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital "Saint Anna", Medical University "Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov", Varna, Bulgaria.,Faculty of Health Care, Medical University Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria
| | - Rafał Watrowski
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79106, Germany
| | - Yavor Kornovski
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital "Saint Anna", Medical University "Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov", Varna, Bulgaria
| | - Deyan Dzhenkov
- Department of General and Clinical Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Deontology, Division of General and Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University "Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov", Varna, Bulgaria
| | - Stanislav Slavchev
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital "Saint Anna", Medical University "Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov", Varna, Bulgaria
| | - Yonka Ivanova
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital "Saint Anna", Medical University "Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov", Varna, Bulgaria
| | - Angel Yordanov
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shen T, Zhao J, Zhao M, Taggart MW, Ramalingam P, Gong Y, Wu Y, Liu H, Zhang J, Resetkova E, Wang WL, Ding Q, Huo L, Yoon E. Unusual Staining of Immunohistochemical Markers PAX8 and CDX2 in Breast Carcinoma: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall. Hum Pathol 2022; 125:35-47. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
15
|
Shen L, Zhang S, Wang K, Wang X. Familial Breast Cancer: Disease Related Gene Mutations and Screening Strategies for Chinese Population. Front Oncol 2021; 11:740227. [PMID: 34926254 PMCID: PMC8671637 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.740227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 5%-10% of the breast cancer cases have a hereditary background, and this subset is referred to as familial breast cancer (FBC). In this review, we summarize the susceptibility genes and genetic syndromes associated with FBC and discuss the FBC screening and high-risk patient consulting strategies for the Chinese population. METHODS We searched the PubMed database for articles published between January 2000 and August 2021. Finally, 380 pieces of literature addressing the genes and genetic syndromes related to FBC were included and reviewed. RESULTS We identified 16 FBC-related genes and divided them into three types (high-, medium-, and low-penetrance) of genes according to their relative risk ratios. In addition, six genetic syndromes were found to be associated with FBC. We then summarized the currently available screening strategies for FBC and discussed those available for high-risk Chinese populations. CONCLUSION Multiple gene mutations and genetic disorders are closely related to FBC. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend corresponding screening strategies for these genetic diseases. However, such guidelines for the Chinese population are still lacking. For screening high-risk groups in the Chinese population, genetic testing is recommended after genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Xiaochen Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Ministry of Education, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schwartz CJ, da Silva EM, Marra A, Gazzo AM, Selenica P, Rai VK, Mandelker D, Pareja F, Misyura M, D'Alfonso TM, Brogi E, Drullinsky P, Razavi P, Robson ME, Drago JZ, Wen HY, Zhang L, Weigelt B, Shia J, Reis-Filho JS, Zhang H. Morphological and genomic characteristics of breast cancers occurring in individuals with Lynch Syndrome. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 28:404-413. [PMID: 34667028 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-2027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Lynch syndrome (LS) is defined by germline pathogenic mutations involving DNA Mismatch Repair (MMR) genes and linked with the development of MMR-deficient (MMRd) colon and endometrial cancers. Whether breast cancers (BC) developing in context of LS are causally related to MMR deficiency (MMRd), remains controversial. Thus, we explored the morphological and genomic characteristics of BCs occurring in LS individuals. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A retrospective analysis of 20,110 cancer patients who underwent multigene panel genetic testing was performed to identify individuals with a likely pathogenic/pathogenic germline variant in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2 who developed BCs. The histological characteristics and immunohistochemical (IHC) assessment of BCs for MMR proteins and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression were assessed on cases with available materials. DNA samples from paired tumors and blood were sequenced with MSK-IMPACT ({greater than or equal to}468 key cancer genes). MSI status was assessed utilizing MSISensor. Mutational signatures were defined using SigMA. RESULTS 272 LS individuals were identified, 13 (5%) of whom had primary BCs. The majority of BCs (92%) were hormone receptor positive tumors. Five (42%) of 12 BCs displayed loss of MMR proteins by IHC. Four (36%) of 11 BCs subjected to tumor-normal sequencing showed dominant microsatellite instability mutational signatures, high tumor mutational burden and indeterminate (27%) or high MSISensor scores (9%). One patient with metastatic MMRd BC received anti-PD1 therapy and achieved a robust and durable response. CONCLUSIONS A subset of BCs developing in LS individuals are etiologically linked to MMRd and may benefit from anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Antonio Marra
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS
| | - Andrea M Gazzo
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Fresia Pareja
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Edi Brogi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | - Pedram Razavi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Mark E Robson
- Breast Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | - Hong Zhang
- Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pope BJ, Clendenning M, Rosty C, Mahmood K, Georgeson P, Joo JE, Walker R, Hutchinson RA, Jayasekara H, Joseland S, Como J, Preston S, Spurdle AB, Macrae FA, Win AK, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA, Winship IM, Buchanan DD. Germline and Tumor Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool To Resolve Suspected Lynch Syndrome. J Mol Diagn 2021; 23:358-371. [PMID: 33383211 PMCID: PMC7927277 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients in whom mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient cancer develops in the absence of pathogenic variants of germline MMR genes or somatic hypermethylation of the MLH1 gene promoter are classified as having suspected Lynch syndrome (SLS). Germline whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and targeted and genome-wide tumor sequencing were applied to identify the underlying cause of tumor MMR deficiency in SLS. Germline WGS was performed on samples from 14 cancer-affected patients with SLS, including two sets of first-degree relatives. MMR genes were assessed for germline pathogenic variants, including complex structural rearrangements and noncoding variants. Tumor tissue was assessed for somatic MMR gene mutations using targeted, whole-exome sequencing or WGS. Germline WGS identified pathogenic MMR variants in 3 of the 14 cases (21.4%), including a 9.5-megabase inversion disrupting MSH2 in a mother and daughter. Excluding these 3 MMR carriers, tumor sequencing identified at least two somatic MMR gene mutations in 8 of 11 tumors tested (72.7%). In a second mother-daughter pair, a somatic cause of tumor MMR deficiency was supported by the presence of double somatic MSH2 mutations in their respective tumors. More than 70% of SLS cases had double somatic MMR mutations in the absence of germline pathogenic variants in the MMR or other DNA repair-related genes on WGS, and, therefore, were confidently assigned a noninherited cause of tumor MMR deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard J Pope
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Melbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Khalid Mahmood
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Melbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Georgeson
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jihoon E Joo
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Romy Walker
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ryan A Hutchinson
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Harindra Jayasekara
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sharelle Joseland
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julia Como
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan Preston
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Molecular Cancer Epidemiology Laboratory, Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aung K Win
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cho H, Yamada M, Sekine S, Tanabe N, Ushiama M, Hirata M, Ogawa G, Gotoh M, Yoshida T, Yoshikawa T, Saito Y, Kuchiba A, Oda I, Sugano K. Gastric cancer is highly prevalent in Lynch syndrome patients with atrophic gastritis. Gastric Cancer 2021; 24:283-291. [PMID: 32794040 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-020-01113-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although gastric cancer is one of the Lynch syndrome (LS)-related tumors, the clinicopathological features of gastric cancer in patients with LS remain uncertain. To investigate the incidence risk and clinicopathological features of gastric neoplasms in LS, we conducted a retrospective cohort study in Japanese LS patients. METHODS LS patients with pathogenic mismatch repair (MMR) gene variants were extracted from the LS registry of the National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan. Cumulative risks of gastric neoplasm, including dysplasia and cancer, were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Gastric atrophy was evaluated endoscopically and/or histologically. Immunohistochemical staining for MMR proteins was performed for all available specimens. RESULTS Of 118 eligible patients, 26 patients were diagnosed with 58 gastric neoplasms. The cumulative incidence of gastric neoplasm was 41.0% (95% confidence interval, 26.9-55.0) at the age of 70. Of these, 13 (50%) patients developed synchronous and/or metachronous multiple gastric neoplasms. Among the 49 gastric neoplasms available for detailed pathological evaluation, all were associated with intestinal metaplasia. Immunohistochemically, 42 (86%) were MMR-deficient. The individuals with gastric atrophy had a significantly higher risk of developing gastric neoplasms compared with those without gastric atrophy (26 cases/54 individuals vs. 0 cases/53 individuals) (P = 0.026). CONCLUSION LS patients, particularly those with atrophic gastritis, are at high risk of gastric neoplasm and often develop multiple tumors. Endoscopic surveillance for gastric cancer is recommended for LS patients, especially those with atrophic gastritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hourin Cho
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Yamada
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
| | - Shigeki Sekine
- Division of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Noriko Tanabe
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Mineko Ushiama
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
- Department of Clinical Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Makoto Hirata
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Gakuto Ogawa
- Biostatistics Division, Center for Research Administration and Support, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Masahiro Gotoh
- Department of Clinical Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Teruhiko Yoshida
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Takaki Yoshikawa
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Aya Kuchiba
- Biostatistics Division, Center for Research Administration and Support, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Ichiro Oda
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Kokichi Sugano
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
- Oncogene Research Unit/Cancer Prevention Unit, Tochigi Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
AbstractLynch syndrome was formerly known as Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer. Currently, these two nomenclatures each have their unique definitions and are no longer used interchangeably. The history of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer was first recognized formally in the literature by Henry Lynch in 1967. With advances of molecular genetics, there has been a transformation from clinical phenotype to genotype diagnostics. This has led to the ability to diagnose affected patients before they manifest with cancer, and therefore allow preventative surveillance strategies. Genotype diagnostics has shown a difference in penetrance of different cancer risks dependent on the gene containing the mutation. Surgery is recommended as prevention for some cancers; for others they are reserved for once cancer is noted. Various surveillance strategies are recommended dependent on the relative risk of cancer and the ability to intervene with surgery to impact on survival. Risk reduction through aspirin has shown some recent promise, and continues to be studied.
Collapse
|
20
|
Mathew JG, Bowman AS, Saab J, Busam KJ, Nehal K, Pulitzer M. Next Generation Sequencing analysis suggests varied multistep mutational pathogenesis for Endocrine Mucin Producing Sweat Gland Carcinoma with comments on INSM1 and MUC2 suggesting a conjunctival origin. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 86:1072-1079. [PMID: 33515627 PMCID: PMC9627720 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.11.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Endocrine mucin-producing sweat gland carcinoma (EMPSGC) is a low-grade eyelid tumor. Small biopsies and insensitive immunohistochemistry predispose to misdiagnosis. We aimed to identify clarifying immunohistochemical and/or molecular markers. Clinicopathologic data (22 cases) was reviewed. Immunohistochemistry (Insulinoma-associated protein-1(INSM1), BCL-2, MUC2, MUC4, androgen-receptor, Beta-catenin, MCPyV) and next generation sequencing (MSK-IMPACT, 468 genes) was performed (3 cases). Female (n=15) and male (n=7) patients, mean-age 71.8 years (53-88), had eyelid/periorbital tumors (>90%) with mucin-containing solid/cystic neuroendocrine pathology. Immunohistochemistry (INSM1, BCL2, androgen-receptor, RB1, Beta-catenin) was diffusely-positive (5/5), MUC2 partial, MUC4 focal, and MCPyV negative. MSK-IMPACT identified 12 single-nucleotide-variants and one in-frame deletion in 3 cases, each with DNA damage response/repair (BRD4, PPP4R2, RTEL1) and tumor-suppressor pathway (BRD4, TP53, TSC1, LATS2) mutations. Microsatellite instability, copy number alterations, and structural alterations were absent. INSM1 and MUC2 are positive in EMPSGC. MUC2 positivity suggests conjunctival origin. Multistep pathogenesis involving DNA damage repair and tumor-suppressor pathways may be implicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph G Mathew
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Anita S Bowman
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jad Saab
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Klaus J Busam
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kishwer Nehal
- Department of Medicine, Dermatology Division, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa Pulitzer
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. https://twitter.com/MPulitzerMD
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gallon R, Gawthorpe P, Phelps RL, Hayes C, Borthwick GM, Santibanez-Koref M, Jackson MS, Burn J. How Should We Test for Lynch Syndrome? A Review of Current Guidelines and Future Strategies. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:406. [PMID: 33499123 PMCID: PMC7865939 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
International guidelines for the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (LS) recommend molecular screening of colorectal cancers (CRCs) to identify patients for germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene testing. As our understanding of the LS phenotype and diagnostic technologies have advanced, there is a need to review these guidelines and new screening opportunities. We discuss the barriers to implementation of current guidelines, as well as guideline limitations, and highlight new technologies and knowledge that may address these. We also discuss alternative screening strategies to increase the rate of LS diagnoses. In particular, the focus of current guidance on CRCs means that approximately half of Lynch-spectrum tumours occurring in unknown male LS carriers, and only one-third in female LS carriers, will trigger testing for LS. There is increasing pressure to expand guidelines to include molecular screening of endometrial cancers, the most frequent cancer in female LS carriers. Furthermore, we collate the evidence to support MMR deficiency testing of other Lynch-spectrum tumours to screen for LS. However, a reliance on tumour tissue limits preoperative testing and, therefore, diagnosis prior to malignancy. The recent successes of functional assays to detect microsatellite instability or MMR deficiency in non-neoplastic tissues suggest that future diagnostic pipelines could become independent of tumour tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Burn
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK; (P.G.); (R.L.P.); (C.H.); (G.M.B.); (M.S.-K.); (M.S.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Peleg Hasson S, Menes T, Sonnenblick A. Comparison of Patient Susceptibility Genes Across Breast Cancer: Implications for Prognosis and Therapeutic Outcomes. PHARMACOGENOMICS & PERSONALIZED MEDICINE 2020; 13:227-238. [PMID: 32801835 PMCID: PMC7394592 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s233485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Hereditary breast cancer syndromes affect a small (10–15% of cases) but significant group of patients. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most familiar and well-studied genes associated with inherited breast cancer. However, mutations in the high-penetrance genes, TP53, PTEN, CDH1, MSH1, MLH1, MSH6, PMS2, PALB2, and STK11, and in the moderate-penetrance genes, CHEK2, ATM, and BRIP1, also correlate with high lifetime risks of breast cancer and other malignancies as well. Advances in breast cancer genetics have led to an improved perception of diagnosis and screening strategies. The specific considerations and challenges involved in treating this unique population have become a fertile ground for research. Indeed, these genes and downstream molecular pathways have now become potential therapeutic targets in breast cancer patients, including those with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. This review describes the variety of hereditary breast cancer genes, from their molecular origins to the prognosis and multidisciplinary clinical decision-making processes. Key publications and other reported recent clinical trials and guidelines are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shira Peleg Hasson
- Oncology Department, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tehillah Menes
- Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv-Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Amir Sonnenblick
- Oncology Department, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Russell H, Kedzierska K, Buchanan DD, Thomas R, Tham E, Mints M, Keränen A, Giles GG, Southey MC, Milne RL, Tomlinson I, Church D, Spurdle AB, O'Mara TA, Lewis A. The MLH1 polymorphism rs1800734 and risk of endometrial cancer with microsatellite instability. Clin Epigenetics 2020; 12:102. [PMID: 32641106 PMCID: PMC7346630 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-020-00889-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Both colorectal (CRC, 15%) and endometrial cancers (EC, 30%) exhibit microsatellite instability (MSI) due to MLH1 hypermethylation and silencing. The MLH1 promoter polymorphism, rs1800734 is associated with MSI CRC risk, increased methylation and reduced MLH1 expression. In EC samples, we investigated rs1800734 risk using MSI and MSS cases and controls. We found no evidence that rs1800734 or other MLH1 SNPs were associated with the risk of MSI EC. We found the rs1800734 risk allele had no effect on MLH1 methylation or expression in ECs. We propose that MLH1 hypermethylation occurs by different mechanisms in CRC and EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Russell
- Cancer Gene Regulation Group, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Katarzyna Kedzierska
- Cancer Genomics and Immunology Group, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
- Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - Rachael Thomas
- Cancer Gene Regulation Group, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Emma Tham
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Miriam Mints
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anne Keränen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Graham G Giles
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia
| | - Roger L Milne
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Cancer Genetics and Evolution Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK
| | - David Church
- Cancer Genomics and Immunology Group, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, QLD, Brisbane, 4006, Australia
| | - Tracy A O'Mara
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, QLD, Brisbane, 4006, Australia
| | - Annabelle Lewis
- Cancer Gene Regulation Group, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK.
- Division of Biosciences, Department of Life Sciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Álvarez K, Orellana P, De la Fuente M, Canales T, Pinto E, Heine C, Solar B, Hurtado C, Møller P, Kronberg U, Zarate AJ, Dominguez-Valentin M, López-Köstner F. Spectrum and Frequency of Tumors, Cancer Risk and Survival in Chilean Families with Lynch Syndrome: Experience of the Implementation of a Registry. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9061861. [PMID: 32549215 PMCID: PMC7356331 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with the highest risk of colorectal (CRC) and several extracolonic cancers. In our effort to characterize LS families from Latin America, this study aimed to describe the spectrum of neoplasms and cancer risk by gender, age and gene, and survival in 34 Chilean LS families. Of them, 59% harbored path_MLH1, 23% path_MSH2, 12% path_PMS2 and 6% path_EPCAM variants. A total of 866 individuals at risk were identified, of which 213 (24.6%) developed 308 neoplasms. In males, CRC was the most common cancer (72.6%), while females showed a greater frequency of extracolonic cancers (58.4%), including uterus and breast (p < 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of extracolonic cancers was higher in females than males (p = 0.001). Path_MLH1 variants are significantly more associated with the development of CRC than extracolonic tumors (59.5% vs. 40.5%) when compared to path_MSH2 (47.5% vs. 52.5%) variants (p = 0.05018). The cumulative incidence of CRC was higher in path_MLH1/path_MSH2 carriers compared to path_PMS2 carriers (p = 0.03). In addition, path_MSH2 carriers showed higher risk of extracolonic tumors (p = 0.002). In conclusion, this study provides a snapshot of the LS profile from Chile and the current LS-associated diagnostic practice and output in Chile. Categorizing cancer risks associated with each population is relevant in the genetic counselling of LS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Álvarez
- Oncology and Molecular Genetic Laboratory, Coloproctology Unit, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago 7591047, Chile; (K.Á.); (P.O.); (M.D.l.F.); (E.P.); (C.H.); (C.H.); (U.K.); (A.J.Z.)
| | - Paulina Orellana
- Oncology and Molecular Genetic Laboratory, Coloproctology Unit, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago 7591047, Chile; (K.Á.); (P.O.); (M.D.l.F.); (E.P.); (C.H.); (C.H.); (U.K.); (A.J.Z.)
| | - Marjorie De la Fuente
- Oncology and Molecular Genetic Laboratory, Coloproctology Unit, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago 7591047, Chile; (K.Á.); (P.O.); (M.D.l.F.); (E.P.); (C.H.); (C.H.); (U.K.); (A.J.Z.)
| | - Tamara Canales
- Cancer Institute, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago 7591047, Chile;
| | - Eliana Pinto
- Oncology and Molecular Genetic Laboratory, Coloproctology Unit, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago 7591047, Chile; (K.Á.); (P.O.); (M.D.l.F.); (E.P.); (C.H.); (C.H.); (U.K.); (A.J.Z.)
| | - Claudio Heine
- Oncology and Molecular Genetic Laboratory, Coloproctology Unit, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago 7591047, Chile; (K.Á.); (P.O.); (M.D.l.F.); (E.P.); (C.H.); (C.H.); (U.K.); (A.J.Z.)
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital San José, Osorno 5311523, Chile
| | - Benjamín Solar
- Genetic Section, University of Chile Clinic Hospital, Santiago 8380456, Chile;
- Servicio de Neurología Infantil, Hospital de Puerto Montt, Puerto Montt 5507798, Chile
| | - Claudia Hurtado
- Oncology and Molecular Genetic Laboratory, Coloproctology Unit, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago 7591047, Chile; (K.Á.); (P.O.); (M.D.l.F.); (E.P.); (C.H.); (C.H.); (U.K.); (A.J.Z.)
| | - Pål Møller
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, 0369 Oslo, Norway; (P.M.); (M.D.-V.)
| | - Udo Kronberg
- Oncology and Molecular Genetic Laboratory, Coloproctology Unit, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago 7591047, Chile; (K.Á.); (P.O.); (M.D.l.F.); (E.P.); (C.H.); (C.H.); (U.K.); (A.J.Z.)
| | - Alejandro José Zarate
- Oncology and Molecular Genetic Laboratory, Coloproctology Unit, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago 7591047, Chile; (K.Á.); (P.O.); (M.D.l.F.); (E.P.); (C.H.); (C.H.); (U.K.); (A.J.Z.)
- Department of Surgery, Finis Terrae University, Santiago 7501015, Chile
| | - Mev Dominguez-Valentin
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, 0369 Oslo, Norway; (P.M.); (M.D.-V.)
- Instituto de Investigación, Universidad Católica de Trujillo, Chimbote 02800, Peru
| | - Francisco López-Köstner
- Oncology and Molecular Genetic Laboratory, Coloproctology Unit, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago 7591047, Chile; (K.Á.); (P.O.); (M.D.l.F.); (E.P.); (C.H.); (C.H.); (U.K.); (A.J.Z.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Porkka NK, Olkinuora A, Kuopio T, Ahtiainen M, Eldfors S, Almusa H, Mecklin JP, Peltomäki P. Does breast carcinoma belong to the Lynch syndrome tumor spectrum? - Somatic mutational profiles vs. ovarian and colorectal carcinomas. Oncotarget 2020; 11:1244-1256. [PMID: 32292574 PMCID: PMC7147090 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Inherited DNA mismatch repair (MMR) defects cause predisposition to colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, and other cancers occurring in Lynch syndrome (LS). It is unsettled whether breast carcinoma belongs to the LS tumor spectrum. We approached this question through somatic mutational analysis of breast carcinomas from LS families, using established LS-spectrum tumors for comparison. Somatic mutational profiles of 578 cancer-relevant genes were determined for LS-breast cancer (LS-BC, n = 20), non-carrier breast cancer (NC-BC, n = 10), LS-ovarian cancer (LS-OC, n = 16), and LS-colorectal cancer (LS-CRC, n = 18) from the National LS Registry of Finland. Microsatellite and MMR protein analysis stratified LS-BCs into MMR-deficient (dMMR, n = 11) and MMR-proficient (pMMR, n = 9) subgroups. All NC-BCs were pMMR and all LS-OCs and LS-CRCs dMMR. All but one dMMR LS-BCs were hypermutated (> 10 non-synonymous mutations/Mb; average 174/Mb per tumor) and the frequency of MMR-deficiency-associated signatures 6, 20, and 26 was comparable to that in LS-OC and LS-CRC. LS-BCs that were pMMR resembled NC-BCs with respect to somatic mutational loads (4/9, 44%, hypermutated with average mutation count 33/Mb vs. 3/10, 30%, hypermutated with average 88 mutations/Mb), whereas mutational signatures shared features of dMMR LS-BC, LS-OC, and LS-CRC. Epigenetic regulatory genes were significantly enriched as mutational targets in LS-BC, LS-OC, and LS-CRC. Many top mutant genes of our LS-BCs have previously been identified as drivers of unselected breast carcinomas. In conclusion, somatic mutational signatures suggest that conventional MMR status of tumor tissues is likely to underestimate the significance of the predisposing MMR defects as contributors to breast tumorigenesis in LS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noora K. Porkka
- Department of Medical and Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Alisa Olkinuora
- Department of Medical and Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Teijo Kuopio
- Department of Pathology, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Maarit Ahtiainen
- Department of Education and Research, Jyväskylä Central Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Samuli Eldfors
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Henrikki Almusa
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jukka-Pekka Mecklin
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Department of Surgery, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Department of Education & Science, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Päivi Peltomäki
- Department of Medical and Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sheehan M, Heald B, Yanda C, Kelly ED, Grobmyer S, Eng C, Kalady M, Pederson H. Investigating the Link between Lynch Syndrome and Breast Cancer. Eur J Breast Health 2020; 16:106-109. [PMID: 32285031 DOI: 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective Lynch syndrome is an inherited genetic disorder associated with a predisposition to early-onset colorectal and endometrial cancers, but breast cancer risk in these patients is debated. The aim of this study is to evaluate breast cancer rates in a cohort of Lynch syndrome patients, as well as to identify women who may be eligible for additional breast cancer specific genetic testing or enhanced breast surveillance (contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening). Materials and Methods Using a hereditary colorectal cancer registry at a single academic institution for identification of patients with Lynch syndrome, a retrospective chart review was performed of 188 women with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) mutations. The Tyrer-Cuzick model was used to estimate breast cancer risk in patients without breast cancer. Results The prevalence of breast cancer differed based on mutation type (p=0.0043), as 27% of women with a PMS2 mutation were diagnosed with breast cancer, compared to 3%, 4%, and 9% in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 patients. The average age at diagnosis for women with a PMS2 mutation was 46.7 years. Additionally, 7.5% of unaffected women had an estimated lifetime risk of breast cancer greater than 20%. 46/188 (24.4%) of patients were eligible for breast specific genetic testing. Conclusion Our analysis suggests that Lynch syndrome patients with PMS2 mutations may be at higher risk of developing breast cancer. Additionally, the personal and family history of cancer suggests crossover in eligibility for breast specific genetic testing in a significant number of patients (16.5-24.4%). Also, many women are eligible for enhanced breast surveillance (7.5%) which would otherwise not be offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Sheehan
- Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Brandie Heald
- Cleveland Clinic, Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Courtney Yanda
- Cleveland Clinic, Breast Services Department, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Erinn Downs Kelly
- Cleveland Clinic, RJ Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stephen Grobmyer
- Cleveland Clinic, Breast Services Department, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Charis Eng
- Cleveland Clinic, Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Matthew Kalady
- Cleveland Clinic, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Holly Pederson
- Cleveland Clinic, Breast Services Department, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lin PH, Chen M, Tsai LW, Lo C, Yen TC, Huang TY, Chen CK, Fan SC, Kuo SH, Huang CS. Using next-generation sequencing to redefine BRCAness in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Sci 2020; 111:1375-1384. [PMID: 31958182 PMCID: PMC7156820 DOI: 10.1111/cas.14313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCAness is considered a predictive biomarker to platinum and poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. However, recent trials showed that its predictive value was limited in triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with platinum. Moreover, tumors with mutations of DNA damage response (DDR) genes, such as homologous recombination (HR) genes, could be sensitive to platinum and PARP inhibitors. Thus, we aim to explore the relationship between mutation status of DDR genes and BRCAness in TNBC. We sequenced 56 DDR genes in 120 TNBC and identified BRCAness by array comparative genomic hybridization. The sequencing results showed that 13, 14, and 14 patients had BRCA, non‐BRCA HR, and non‐HR DDR gene mutations, respectively. Array comparative genomic hybridization revealed that BRCA‐mutated and HR gene‐mutated TNBC shared similar BRCAness features, both having higher numbers and longer length of large‐scale structural aberration (LSA, >10 Mb) and similar altered chromosomal regions of LSA. These suggested non‐BRCA HR gene‐mutated TNBC shared similar characteristics with BRCA‐mutated TNBC, indicating non‐BRCA HR gene‐mutated TNBC sensitive to platinum and PARP inhibitors. Among tumors with mutation of non‐HR DDR genes, 3 PTEN and 1 MSH6 mutation also contained significant LSAs (BRCAness); however, they had different regions of genomic alteration to BRCA and HR gene‐mutated tumors, might explain prior findings that PTEN‐ and MSH6‐mutated cancer cells not sensitive to PARP inhibitors. Therefore, we hypothesize that the heterogeneous genomic background of BRCAness indicates different responsiveness to platinum and PARP inhibitors. Direct sequencing DDR genes in TNBC should be applied to predict their sensitivity toward platinum and PARP inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Han Lin
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Genomic Medicine and Center for Medical Genetics, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Li-Wei Tsai
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chiao Lo
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Chun Yen
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Yoyan Huang
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Kai Chen
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sheng-Chih Fan
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sung-Hsin Kuo
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chiun-Sheng Huang
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Angeli D, Salvi S, Tedaldi G. Genetic Predisposition to Breast and Ovarian Cancers: How Many and Which Genes to Test? Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E1128. [PMID: 32046255 PMCID: PMC7038038 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21031128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast and ovarian cancers are some of the most common tumors in females, and the genetic predisposition is emerging as one of the key risk factors in the development of these two malignancies. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the best-known genes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. However, recent advances in molecular techniques, Next-Generation Sequencing in particular, have led to the identification of many new genes involved in the predisposition to breast and/or ovarian cancer, with different penetrance estimates. TP53, PTEN, STK11, and CDH1 have been identified as high penetrance genes for the risk of breast/ovarian cancers. Besides them, PALB2, BRIP1, ATM, CHEK2, BARD1, NBN, NF1, RAD51C, RAD51D and mismatch repair genes have been recognized as moderate and low penetrance genes, along with other genes encoding proteins involved in the same pathways, possibly associated with breast/ovarian cancer risk. In this review, we summarize the past and more recent findings in the field of cancer predisposition genes, with insights into the role of the encoded proteins and the associated genetic disorders. Furthermore, we discuss the possible clinical utility of genetic testing in terms of prevention protocols and therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Angeli
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Samanta Salvi
- Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Gianluca Tedaldi
- Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee SE, Lee HS, Kim KY, Park JH, Roh H, Park HY, Kim WS. High prevalence of the MLH1 V384D germline mutation in patients with HER2-positive luminal B breast cancer. Sci Rep 2019; 9:10966. [PMID: 31358837 PMCID: PMC6662670 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-47439-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
HER2-positive luminal B breast cancer (BC), a subset of the luminal B subtype, is ER-positive and HER2-positive BC which is approximately 10% of all BC. However, HER2-positive luminal B BC has received less attention and is less represented in previous molecular analyses than other subtypes. Hence, it is important to elucidate the molecular biology of HER2-positive luminal B BC to stratify patients in a way that allows them to receive their respective optimal treatment. We performed molecular profiling using targeted next-generation sequencing on 94 HER2-positive luminal B BC to identify its molecular characteristics. A total of 134 somatic nonsynonymous mutations, including 131 nonsynonymous single nucleotide variants and three coding insertions/deletions were identified in 30 genes of 75 samples. PIK3CA was most frequently mutated (38/94, 40.4%), followed by TP53 (31/94, 33.0%), and others were detected at lower frequencies. Recurrent germline mutations of MLH1 V384D were found in 13.8% (13/94), with a significantly high TP53 mutations rate. The frequency of MLH1 V384D germline mutation in individuals with HER2-positive luminal B BC was significantly higher than that observed in the controls. All 13 cases were classified as microsatellite stable tumors. Tumor mutation burdens (TMB) were not significantly different between MLH1 V384D carrier and wild type. The concordant results of microsatellite instability (MSI) and TMB suggest that the haploinsufficiency of MLH1 plays a role as a tumor predisposition factor rather than a direct oncogenic driver. Our study identified, for the first time, that MLH1 V384D germline variant is frequently detected in HER2-positive luminal B BC. MLH1 V384D germline variant may not only contribute to gastrointestinal cancer predisposition but may also contribute to BC in East Asians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Eun Lee
- Department of Pathology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Seung Lee
- Department of Pathology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Jung-Hoon Park
- Precision Medicine Institute, Macrogen, Inc., Seoul, Korea
| | - Hanseong Roh
- Precision Medicine Institute, Macrogen, Inc., Seoul, Korea
| | - Ha Young Park
- Department of Pathology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
| | - Wan-Seop Kim
- Department of Pathology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cohen SA, Pritchard CC, Jarvik GP. Lynch Syndrome: From Screening to Diagnosis to Treatment in the Era of Modern Molecular Oncology. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2019; 20:293-307. [PMID: 30848956 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome is a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline alterations in the mismatch repair genes and is the most common etiology of hereditary colorectal cancer. While Lynch syndrome was initially defined by the clinical Amsterdam criteria, these criteria lack the sensitivity needed for clinical utility. This review covers the evolution of screening for Lynch syndrome from the use of tumor microsatellite instability and/or somatic alterations in mismatch repair protein expression by immunohistochemistry to the newest methods using next-generation sequencing. Additionally, it discusses the clinical implications of the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome as it affects cancer therapeutics and the role of screening in noncolorectal Lynch-associated cancers. As molecular oncology continues to evolve, it is crucial to remain current on the increasing complexity of Lynch syndrome diagnostics and treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey A Cohen
- Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA; .,Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.,Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Roberts ME, Jackson SA, Susswein LR, Zeinomar N, Ma X, Marshall ML, Stettner AR, Milewski B, Xu Z, Solomon BD, Terry MB, Hruska KS, Klein RT, Chung WK. MSH6 and PMS2 germ-line pathogenic variants implicated in Lynch syndrome are associated with breast cancer. Genet Med 2018; 20:1167-1174. [PMID: 29345684 PMCID: PMC6051923 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE An association of Lynch syndrome (LS) with breast cancer has been long suspected; however, there have been insufficient data to address this question for each of the LS genes individually. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of personal and family history in 423 women with pathogenic or likely pathogenic germ-line variants in MLH1 (N = 65), MSH2 (N = 94), MSH6 (N = 140), or PMS2 (N = 124) identified via clinical multigene hereditary cancer testing. Standard incidence ratios (SIRs) of breast cancer were calculated by comparing breast cancer frequencies in our study population with those in the general population (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 data). RESULTS When evaluating by gene, the age-standardized breast cancer risks for MSH6 (SIR = 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.56-2.86) and PMS2 (SIR = 2.92; 95% CI, 2.17-3.92) were associated with a statistically significant risk for breast cancer whereas no association was observed for MLH1 (SIR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.42-1.83) or MSH2 (SIR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.72-2.06). CONCLUSION Our data demonstrate that two LS genes, MSH6 and PMS2, are associated with an increased risk for breast cancer and should be considered when ordering genetic testing for individuals who have a personal and/or family history of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nur Zeinomar
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Xinran Ma
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lee J, Gubernick LR, Brodsky AL, Fehniger JE, Levine DA, Gerber D, Asgari SA, Cantor A, Martineau JT, Ginsburg OM, Smith JA, Pothuri B. Missed opportunities: Genetic counseling and testing among an ethnically diverse cohort of women with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 151:153-158. [PMID: 30077346 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2018] [Revised: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for the majority of inherited endometrial cancers (EC), and the identification of probands presents a unique opportunity to treat and prevent multiple cancers. The diagnosis of EC can provide the indication for women with specific risk factors to undergo genetic testing (GT). We sought to evaluate genetic counseling referrals (GCR) and subsequent GT rates in an ethnically diverse group of high-risk women. METHODS All women diagnosed with EC between 2011 and 2016 were identified. Risk factors for LS including age, family and personal histories of Lynch-related cancers and loss of tumor mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression were identified from laboratory and medical records. Standard two-sided statistical tests were used. RESULTS Of 583 women diagnosed with EC, 184 (31.6%) were found to have at least one high-risk characteristic for LS. Among these high-risk women, 58% were given GCR and resulting in only 35% undergoing GT. Ten of the 65 high-risk women who had GT (15.4%) were diagnosed with Lynch syndrome, and all ten met high-risk criteria. Two women of Asian race had tumors exhibiting retained MMR protein expression despite germline testing demonstrating Lynch syndrome. CONCLUSIONS Many high-risk women do not receive GCR despite a high rate of germline mutations among these women. Improving GCR among high-risk women will lead to more subsequent GT to identify more Lynch syndrome families and prevent additional cancers. Among our ethnically diverse cohort, two women diagnosed with LS had retained MMR protein expression. GCR should be offered to women who possess high-risk characteristics despite normal MMR protein expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Lee
- New York University Langone Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, 240 East 38th Street, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Allison L Brodsky
- New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julia E Fehniger
- New York University Langone Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, 240 East 38th Street, New York, NY, USA
| | - Douglas A Levine
- New York University Langone Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, 240 East 38th Street, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deanna Gerber
- New York University Langone Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, 240 East 38th Street, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shabnam A Asgari
- New York University Langone Health, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, High-Risk Cancer Program, 160 East 34th Street, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Cantor
- New York University Langone Health, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, High-Risk Cancer Program, 160 East 34th Street, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica T Martineau
- New York University Langone Health, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, High-Risk Cancer Program, 160 East 34th Street, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ophira M Ginsburg
- New York University Langone Health, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, High-Risk Cancer Program, 160 East 34th Street, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julia A Smith
- New York University Langone Health, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, High-Risk Cancer Program, 160 East 34th Street, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bhavana Pothuri
- New York University Langone Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, 240 East 38th Street, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Goldberg M, Bell K, Aronson M, Semotiuk K, Pond G, Gallinger S, Zbuk K. Association between the Lynch syndrome gene MSH2 and breast cancer susceptibility in a Canadian familial cancer registry. J Med Genet 2017; 54:742-746. [PMID: 28779004 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2017] [Revised: 07/09/2017] [Accepted: 07/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies assessing breast cancer risk in families with Lynch syndrome (LS) have yielded conflicting results. Furthermore, conclusions are limited by small sample size and few breast cancer outcomes. This study assesses breast cancer risk in a large prospectively followed LS cohort. METHODS Pedigrees of 325 unrelated families with LS within the Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry in Canada were examined for breast cancer diagnoses. Standardised incidence ratios (SIR) and lifetime cumulative incidence calculations were used to compare the incidence of breast cancer in mutation carriers with the general population. RESULTS Forty-one mutation carriers diagnosed with breast cancer belonging to 34 unrelated families were identified. Mean age at diagnosis was 54 years. The mutation distribution among the LS patients with breast cancer was statistically different from those without breast cancer (p=0.015), reflecting the predominance of MSH2 mutations among affected patients (74%). Eighty-eight per cent of LS families with breast cancer met Amsterdam criteria, compared with 49% of LS families without breast cancer (p=0.03). Lifetime cumulative incidence of breast cancer in female MSH2 mutation carriers in our cohort was 22% (p<0.001). The SIR for breast cancer of female MSH2 mutation carriers in our cohort was 3.11 (95% CI 1.95 to 4.71). CONCLUSIONS An increased risk of breast cancer in MSH2 mutation carriers was demonstrated in a Canadian familial cancer registry. Women with breast cancer often had a personal and family history of multiple LS-related malignancies. These results suggest a potential role for intensified breast cancer surveillance among women with LS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mira Goldberg
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Kathleen Bell
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Melyssa Aronson
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kara Semotiuk
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Greg Pond
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Oncology, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kevin Zbuk
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Espenschied CR, LaDuca H, Li S, McFarland R, Gau CL, Hampel H. Multigene Panel Testing Provides a New Perspective on Lynch Syndrome. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:2568-2575. [PMID: 28514183 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.71.9260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Most existing literature describes Lynch syndrome (LS) as a hereditary syndrome leading to high risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer mainly as a result of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. Most of these studies were performed on cohorts with disease suggestive of hereditary CRC and population-based CRC and endometrial cancer cohorts, possibly biasing results. We aimed to describe a large cohort of mismatch repair (MMR) mutation carriers ascertained through multigene panel testing, evaluate their phenotype, and compare the results with those of previous studies. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical histories of patients who had multigene panel testing, including the MMR and EPCAM genes, between March 2012 and June 2015 (N = 34,981) and performed a series of statistical comparisons. Results Overall, MSH6 mutations were most frequent, followed by PMS2, MSH2, MLH1, and EPCAM mutations, respectively. Of 528 patients who had MMR mutations, 63 (11.9%) had breast cancer only and 144 (27.3%) had CRC only. When comparing those with breast cancer only to those with CRC only, MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations ( P = 2.3 × 10-5). Of the 528 patients, 22.2% met BRCA1 and BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2) testing criteria and not LS criteria, and 5.1% met neither BRCA1/2 nor LS testing criteria. MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations among patients who met BRCA1/2 testing criteria but did not meet LS testing criteria ( P = 4.3 × 10-7). Conclusion These results provide a new perspective on LS and suggest that individuals with MSH6 and PMS2 mutations may present with a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer phenotype. These data also highlight the limitations of current testing criteria in identifying these patients, as well as the need for further investigation of cancer risks in patients with MMR mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carin R Espenschied
- Carin R. Espenschied, Holly LaDuca, Shuwei Li, Rachel McFarland, and Chia-Ling Gau, Ambry Genetics, Clinical Diagnostics, Aliso Viejo, CA; and Heather Hampel, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Holly LaDuca
- Carin R. Espenschied, Holly LaDuca, Shuwei Li, Rachel McFarland, and Chia-Ling Gau, Ambry Genetics, Clinical Diagnostics, Aliso Viejo, CA; and Heather Hampel, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Shuwei Li
- Carin R. Espenschied, Holly LaDuca, Shuwei Li, Rachel McFarland, and Chia-Ling Gau, Ambry Genetics, Clinical Diagnostics, Aliso Viejo, CA; and Heather Hampel, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Rachel McFarland
- Carin R. Espenschied, Holly LaDuca, Shuwei Li, Rachel McFarland, and Chia-Ling Gau, Ambry Genetics, Clinical Diagnostics, Aliso Viejo, CA; and Heather Hampel, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Chia-Ling Gau
- Carin R. Espenschied, Holly LaDuca, Shuwei Li, Rachel McFarland, and Chia-Ling Gau, Ambry Genetics, Clinical Diagnostics, Aliso Viejo, CA; and Heather Hampel, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Heather Hampel
- Carin R. Espenschied, Holly LaDuca, Shuwei Li, Rachel McFarland, and Chia-Ling Gau, Ambry Genetics, Clinical Diagnostics, Aliso Viejo, CA; and Heather Hampel, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Buchanan DD, Clendenning M, Rosty C, Eriksen SV, Walsh MD, Walters RJ, Thibodeau SN, Stewart J, Preston S, Win AK, Flander L, Ouakrim DA, Macrae FA, Boussioutas A, Winship IM, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Southey MC, English D, Jenkins MA. Tumor testing to identify lynch syndrome in two Australian colorectal cancer cohorts. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 32:427-438. [PMID: 27273229 PMCID: PMC5140773 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Tumor testing of colorectal cancers (CRC) for mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is an effective approach to identify carriers of germline MMR gene mutation (Lynch syndrome). The aim of this study was to identify MMR gene mutation carriers in two cohorts of population-based CRC utilizing a combination of tumor and germline testing approaches. METHODS Colorectal cancers from 813 patients diagnosed with CRC < 60 years of age from the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (ACCFR) and from 826 patients from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (MCCS) were tested for MMR protein expression using immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability (MSI), BRAFV600E somatic mutation, and for MLH1 methylation. MMR gene mutation testing (Sanger sequencing and Multiplex Ligation Dependent Probe Amplification) was performed on germline DNA of patients with MMR-deficient tumors and a subset of MMR-proficient CRCs. RESULTS Of the 813 ACCFR probands, 90 probands demonstrated tumor MMR deficiency (11.1%), and 42 had a MMR gene germline mutation (5.2%). For the MCCS, MMR deficiency was identified in the tumors of 103 probands (12.5%) and seven had a germline mutation (0.8%). All the mutation carriers were diagnosed prior to 70 years of age. Probands with a MMR-deficient CRC without MLH1 methylation and a gene mutation were considered Lynch-like and comprised 41.1% and 25.2% of the MMR-deficient CRCs for the ACCFR and MCCS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Identification of MMR gene mutation carriers in Australian CRC-affected patients is optimized by immunohistochemistry screening of CRC diagnosed before 70 years of age. A significant proportion of MMR-deficient CRCs will have unknown etiology (Lynch-like) proving problematic for clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stine V Eriksen
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael D Walsh
- Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rhiannon J Walters
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stephen N Thibodeau
- Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jenna Stewart
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan Preston
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aung Ko Win
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louisa Flander
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Driss Ait Ouakrim
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alex Boussioutas
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Genomics and Predictive Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Institute of Health and Environment, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dallas English
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Deb S, Lakhani SR, Ottini L, Fox SB. The cancer genetics and pathology of male breast cancer. Histopathology 2016; 68:110-8. [PMID: 26768033 DOI: 10.1111/his.12862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Male breast cancer (MBC) is an uncommon and poorly understood disease. Recent molecular studies have shown important differences from female breast cancer which are likely to influence treatment strategies from the current female-based management towards a more tailored approach. Significantly more MBCs than female breast cancers arise with an underlying germline cancer predisposition, and display a vastly different penetrance compared with females. Furthermore, the genophenotypical association of basal-like cancer with BRCA1 present in female breast cancer is not observed in male breast cancer. Differences in somatic changes between male and female breast cancer have also been reported, with particular enrichment of PIK3CA mutations and a paucity of TP53 mutations. In general, chromosomal-based changes, in particular regions of gains, are seen more frequently in male than female breast cancer and methylation is seen less frequently. Clinically, several molecular subtypes with prognostic relevance have been described, including chromosomal complex high and methylation high groups, and subgroups with profiling signatures pertaining to epithelial mesenchymal transition and hormonal therapy insensitivity. As with female breast cancer, attention to male specific multicentre trials based on the individual characteristics are needed, together with establishment of reliable preclinical models to understand more clearly the pathogenesis of male breast cancer and improve the general poor outcome of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddhartha Deb
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Pathology and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Sunil R Lakhani
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.,Department of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.,The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Laura Ottini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Pathology and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cobain EF, Milliron KJ, Merajver SD. Updates on breast cancer genetics: Clinical implications of detecting syndromes of inherited increased susceptibility to breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2016; 43:528-535. [DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2016.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
38
|
Rashid MU, Naeemi H, Muhammad N, Loya A, Yusuf MA, Lubiński J, Jakubowska A, Hamann U. A novel deleterious c.2656G>T MSH2 germline mutation in a Pakistani family with a phenotypic overlap of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2016; 14:14. [PMID: 27413415 PMCID: PMC4942885 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-016-0056-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) and Lynch syndrome (LS) account for a significant proportion of inherited gynecologic malignancies, mainly caused by pathogenic germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes or in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, such as MLH1 and MSH2. Women harboring deleterious mutations in these genes have increased life-time risks of developing a number of malignancies including ovarian cancer. Since there is a phenotypic overlap of HBOC and LS, timely identification of individuals at-risk of a particular syndrome is crucial in order to optimize cancer risk management. Case presentation We report a novel pathogenic MSH2 mutation, c.2656G > T, which was identified in a 67-year-old female patient with breast cancer, who had previously tested negative for a deleterious mutation in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 or RAD51C. The patient reported a personal history of endometrial cancer diagnosed at age 48, and a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer, as well as several other malignancies within the spectrum of LS. The novel mutation was also found in the index patient’s daughter and a niece, who were diagnosed with endometrial and ovarian cancer, respectively. Breast and endometrial tumors from c.2656G > T mutation carriers showed loss of MSH2 and MSH6 protein expression. The mutation was absent in the control population. Conclusions Our finding suggests that testing for MMR genes may be of benefit to BRCA1/2 negative families with overlapping HBOC and LS phenotype in Pakistan. It is clinically significant to identify individuals harboring mutations in genes linked with a particular syndrome so that they can benefit from targeted life-saving cancer surveillance and preventive strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad U Rashid
- Basic Sciences Research, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (SKMCH & RC), Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Humaira Naeemi
- Basic Sciences Research, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (SKMCH & RC), Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Noor Muhammad
- Basic Sciences Research, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (SKMCH & RC), Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Asif Loya
- Department of Pathology, SKMCH & RC, Lahore, Pakistan
| | | | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Polabska 4, 70-115 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Polabska 4, 70-115 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 580, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dominguez-Valentin M, Joost P, Therkildsen C, Jonsson M, Rambech E, Nilbert M. Frequent mismatch-repair defects link prostate cancer to Lynch syndrome. BMC Urol 2016; 16:15. [PMID: 27013479 PMCID: PMC4806412 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-016-0130-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2015] [Accepted: 03/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A possible role for prostate cancer in Lynch syndrome has been debated based on observations of mismatch-repair defective tumors and reports of an increased risk of prostate cancer in mutation carriers. Potential inclusion of prostate cancer in the Lynch syndrome tumor spectrum is relevant for family classification, risk estimates and surveillance recommendations in mutation carriers. METHODS We used the population-based Danish HNPCC-register to identify all prostate cancers that developed in mutation carriers and in their first-degree relatives from 288 Lynch syndrome families. The tumors were evaluated for clinicopathologic features and mismatch-repair status, and the cumulative risk of prostate cancer was determined. RESULTS In total, 28 prostate cancers developed in 16 mutation carriers and in 12 first-degree relatives at a median age of 63 years. The majority of the tumors were high-grade tumors with Gleason scores 8-10. Prostate cancer was associated with mutations in MSH2, MLH1 and MSH6 with loss of the respective mismatch repair protein in 69 % of the tumors, though a MSI-high phenotype was restricted to 13 % of the tumors. The cumulative risk of prostate cancer at age 70 was 3.7 % (95 % CI: 2.3-4.9). CONCLUSION We provide evidence to link prostate cancer to Lynch syndrome through demonstration of MMR defective tumors and an increased risk of the disease, which suggests that prostate cancer should be considered in the diagnostic work-up of Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mev Dominguez-Valentin
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, SE-22381, Lund, Sweden
| | - Patrick Joost
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, SE-22381, Lund, Sweden
| | - Christina Therkildsen
- HNPCC-Register, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Mats Jonsson
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, SE-22381, Lund, Sweden
| | - Eva Rambech
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, SE-22381, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mef Nilbert
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, SE-22381, Lund, Sweden. .,HNPCC-Register, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rosty C, Clendenning M, Walsh MD, Eriksen SV, Southey MC, Winship IM, Macrae FA, Boussioutas A, Poplawski NK, Parry S, Arnold J, Young JP, Casey G, Haile RW, Gallinger S, Le Marchand L, Newcomb PA, Potter JD, DeRycke M, Lindor NM, Thibodeau SN, Baron JA, Win AK, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA, Buchanan DD. Germline mutations in PMS2 and MLH1 in individuals with solitary loss of PMS2 expression in colorectal carcinomas from the Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e010293. [PMID: 26895986 PMCID: PMC4762074 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Immunohistochemistry for DNA mismatch repair proteins is used to screen for Lynch syndrome in individuals with colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Although solitary loss of PMS2 expression is indicative of carrying a germline mutation in PMS2, previous studies reported MLH1 mutation in some cases. We determined the prevalence of MLH1 germline mutations in a large cohort of individuals with a CRC demonstrating solitary loss of PMS2 expression. DESIGN This cohort study included 88 individuals affected with a PMS2-deficient CRC from the Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort. Germline PMS2 mutation analysis (long-range PCR and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification) was followed by MLH1 mutation testing (Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification). RESULTS Of the 66 individuals with complete mutation screening, we identified a pathogenic PMS2 mutation in 49 (74%), a pathogenic MLH1 mutation in 8 (12%) and a MLH1 variant of uncertain clinical significance predicted to be damaging by in silico analysis in 3 (4%); 6 (9%) carried variants likely to have no clinical significance. Missense point mutations accounted for most alterations (83%; 9/11) in MLH1. The MLH1 c.113A> G p.Asn38Ser mutation was found in 2 related individuals. One individual who carried the MLH1 intronic mutation c.677+3A>G p.Gln197Argfs*8 leading to the skipping of exon 8, developed 2 tumours, both of which retained MLH1 expression. CONCLUSIONS A substantial proportion of CRCs with solitary loss of PMS2 expression are associated with a deleterious MLH1 germline mutation supporting the screening for MLH1 in individuals with tumours of this immunophenotype, when no PMS2 mutation has been identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Rosty
- Envoi Pathology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- The School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael D Walsh
- Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stine V Eriksen
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alex Boussioutas
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Genomics and Predictive Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicola K Poplawski
- South Australian Clinical Genetics Service, SA Pathology at the WCH, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- University Department of Paediatrics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Susan Parry
- New Zealand Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Gastroenterology, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Julie Arnold
- Department of Gastroenterology, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Joanne P Young
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- SAHMRI Colorectal Node, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Research, Woodville, South Australia, Australia
| | - Graham Casey
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Robert W Haile
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Polly A Newcomb
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - John D Potter
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Melissa DeRycke
- Departments of Health Sciences Research, Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Medical Genetics, Medical Genomics Technology and Advanced Genomics Technology Center, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Noralane M Lindor
- Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Stephen N Thibodeau
- Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - John A Baron
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Aung Ko Win
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bilbao-Sieyro C, Ramírez R, Rodríguez-González G, Falcón O, León L, Torres S, Fernández L, Alonso S, Díaz-Chico N, Perucho M, Díaz-Chico JC. Microsatellite instability and ploidy status define three categories with distinctive prognostic impact in endometrioid endometrial cancer. Oncotarget 2015; 5:6206-17. [PMID: 25026289 PMCID: PMC4171623 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.2187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) and aneuploidy are inversely related phenomena. We tested whether ploidy status influences the clinical impact of MSI in endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). We analyzed 167 EECs for MSI and ploidy. Tumors were classified in three categories according to MSI and ploidy status. Associations with clinicopathological and molecular variables, survival, and treatment response were assessed. All MSI tumors (23%) were scored as diploid, and 14% of microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors presented aneuploidy. MSI tumors associated with older age at diagnosis, non-obesity, high histological grade, and advanced surgical stage. MSS-aneuploid tumors also associated with higher grade and advanced stage. In multivariate survival analysis MSI did not influence disease-free survival (DFS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS). However, when just diploid tumors were considered for the analysis, MSI significantly contributed to worse DFS and CSS, and the same was observed for aneuploidy when MSS tumors were analyzed alone. In diploid tumors, a differential response to postoperative radiotherapy (RT) was observed according to MSI, since it predicted poor DFS and CSS in the multivariate analysis. We conclude that ploidy status influences the clinical impact of MSI in EEC. Among diploid tumors those with MSI have poor clinical outcome and respond worse to RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Bilbao-Sieyro
- Cancer Research Institute of The Canary Islands (ICIC), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain; Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Physiology Department, Molecular and Translational Endocrinology Group, Institute for Biomedical and Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Raquel Ramírez
- Cancer Research Institute of The Canary Islands (ICIC), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain; Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Physiology Department, Molecular and Translational Endocrinology Group, Institute for Biomedical and Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Germán Rodríguez-González
- Cancer Research Institute of The Canary Islands (ICIC), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain; Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Physiology Department, Molecular and Translational Endocrinology Group, Institute for Biomedical and Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Orlando Falcón
- Cancer Research Institute of The Canary Islands (ICIC), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Materno-Insular de Canarias, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Laureano León
- Cancer Research Institute of The Canary Islands (ICIC), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain; Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario Materno-Insular de Canarias, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Santiago Torres
- Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Physiology Department, Molecular and Translational Endocrinology Group, Institute for Biomedical and Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Leandro Fernández
- Cancer Research Institute of The Canary Islands (ICIC), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain; Clinical Sciences Department, Molecular and Translational Endocrinology Group, Institute for Biomedical and Health Research, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Sergio Alonso
- Institute of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (IMPPC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nicolás Díaz-Chico
- Cancer Research Institute of The Canary Islands (ICIC), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain; Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Physiology Department, Molecular and Translational Endocrinology Group, Institute for Biomedical and Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Manuel Perucho
- Institute of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (IMPPC), Barcelona, Spain; Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute (SBMRI), La Jolla, CA, USA; Instituciò Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Passeig Lluis Companys 23, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Díaz-Chico
- Cancer Research Institute of The Canary Islands (ICIC), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain; Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Physiology Department, Molecular and Translational Endocrinology Group, Institute for Biomedical and Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rosty C, Walsh MD, Lindor NM, Thibodeau SN, Mundt E, Gallinger S, Aronson M, Pollett A, Baron JA, Pearson S, Clendenning M, Walters RJ, Nagler BN, Crawford WJ, Young JP, Winship I, Win AK, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA, Buchanan DD. High prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency in prostate cancers diagnosed in mismatch repair gene mutation carriers from the colon cancer family registry. Fam Cancer 2015; 13:573-82. [PMID: 25117503 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-014-9744-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The question of whether prostate cancer is part of the Lynch syndrome spectrum of tumors is unresolved. We investigated the mismatch repair (MMR) status and pathologic features of prostate cancers diagnosed in MMR gene mutation carriers. Prostate cancers (mean age at diagnosis = 62 ± SD = 8 years) from 32 MMR mutation carriers (23 MSH2, 5 MLH1 and 4 MSH6) enrolled in the Australasian, Mayo Clinic and Ontario sites of the Colon Cancer Family Registry were examined for clinico-pathologic features and MMR-deficiency (immunohistochemical loss of MMR protein expression and high levels of microsatellite instability; MSI-H). Tumor MMR-deficiency was observed for 22 cases [69 %; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 50-83 %], with the highest prevalence of MMR-deficiency in tumors from MSH2 mutation carriers (19/23, 83 %) compared with MLH1 and MSH6 carriers combined (3/9, 33 %; p = 0.01). MMR-deficient tumors had increased levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes compared with tumors without MMR-deficiency (p = 0.04). Under the assumption that tumour MMR-deficiency occurred only because the cancer was caused by the germline mutation, mutation carriers are at 3.2-fold (95 % CI 2.0-6.3) increased risk of prostate cancer, and when assessed by gene, the relative risk was greatest for MSH2 carriers (5.8, 95 % CI 2.6-20.9). Prostate cancer was the first or only diagnosed tumor in 37 % of carriers. MMR gene mutation carriers have at least a twofold or greater increased risk of developing MMR-deficient prostate cancer where the risk is highest for MSH2 mutation carriers. MMR IHC screening of prostate cancers will aid in identifying MMR gene mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Rosty
- Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
McFarland D, Miller-Samuel S, Schmidt H, Morris GJ. Case series: five individuals diagnosed with breast and gastrointestinal cancers: are they "related"? Semin Oncol 2015; 42:e1-12. [PMID: 25726062 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
44
|
Rosty C, Williamson EJ, Clendenning M, Walters RJ, Win AK, Jenkins MA, Hopper JL, Winship IM, Southey MC, Giles GG, English DR, Buchanan DD. Should the grading of colorectal adenocarcinoma include microsatellite instability status? Hum Pathol 2014; 45:2077-84. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2014] [Revised: 06/19/2014] [Accepted: 06/25/2014] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
45
|
Giardiello FM, Allen JI, Axilbund JE, Boland CR, Burke CA, Burt RW, Church JM, Dominitz JA, Johnson DA, Kaltenbach T, Levin TR, Lieberman DA, Robertson DJ, Syngal S, Rex DK. Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2014; 147:502-26. [PMID: 25043945 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 337] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The Multi-Society Task Force, in collaboration with invited experts, developed guidelines to assist health care providers with the appropriate provision of genetic testing and management of patients at risk for and affected with Lynch syndrome as follows: Figure 1 provides a colorectal cancer risk assessment tool to screen individuals in the office or endoscopy setting; Figure 2 illustrates a strategy for universal screening for Lynch syndrome by tumor testing of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer; Figures 3-6 provide algorithms for genetic evaluation of affected and at-risk family members of pedigrees with Lynch syndrome; Table 10 provides guidelines for screening at-risk and affected persons with Lynch syndrome; and Table 12 lists the guidelines for the management of patients with Lynch syndrome. A detailed explanation of Lynch syndrome and the methodology utilized to derive these guidelines, as well as an explanation of, and supporting literature for, these guidelines are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John I Allen
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jason A Dominitz
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | - Douglas J Robertson
- White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, White River Junction, Vermont
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Giardiello FM, Allen JI, Axilbund JE, Boland CR, Burke CA, Burt RW, Church JM, Dominitz JA, Johnson DA, Kaltenbach T, Levin TR, Lieberman DA, Robertson DJ, Syngal S, Rex DK. Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80:197-220. [PMID: 25034835 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
47
|
Giardiello FM, Allen JI, Axilbund JE, Boland CR, Burke CA, Burt RW, Church JM, Dominitz JA, Johnson DA, Kaltenbach T, Levin TR, Lieberman DA, Robertson DJ, Syngal S, Rex DK. Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109:1159-79. [PMID: 25070057 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 312] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The Multi-Society Task Force, in collaboration with invited experts, developed guidelines to assist health care providers with the appropriate provision of genetic testing and management of patients at risk for and affected with Lynch syndrome as follows: Figure 1 provides a colorectal cancer risk assessment tool to screen individuals in the office or endoscopy setting; Figure 2 illustrates a strategy for universal screening for Lynch syndrome by tumor testing of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer; Figures 3,4,5,6 provide algorithms for genetic evaluation of affected and at-risk family members of pedigrees with Lynch syndrome; Table 10 provides guidelines for screening at-risk and affected persons with Lynch syndrome; and Table 12 lists the guidelines for the management of patients with Lynch syndrome. A detailed explanation of Lynch syndrome and the methodology utilized to derive these guidelines, as well as an explanation of, and supporting literature for, these guidelines are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John I Allen
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jason A Dominitz
- 1] VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA [2] University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Douglas J Robertson
- 1] White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA [2] Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, White River Junction, Vermont, USA
| | - Sapna Syngal
- 1] Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA [2] Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA [3] Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lee E, Levine EA, Franco VI, Allen GO, Gong F, Zhang Y, Hu JJ. Combined genetic and nutritional risk models of triple negative breast cancer. Nutr Cancer 2014; 66:955-63. [PMID: 25023197 DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2014.932397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) presents clinical challenges due to unknown etiology, lack of treatment targets, and poor prognosis. We examined combined genetic and nutritional risk models of TNBC in 354 breast cancer cases. We evaluated 18 DNA-repair nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) and dietary/nutritional intakes. Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines models were used to select nutrients of interest and define cut-off values for logistic regression models. Our results suggest that TNBC was associated with 6 DNA-repair nsSNPs, ERCC4 R415Q (rs1800067), MSH3 R940Q (rs184967), MSH6 G39E (rs1042821), POLD1 R119H (rs1726801), XRCC1 R194W (rs1799782), and XPC A499V (rs2228000) and/or deficiencies in 3 micronutrients (zinc, folate, and β-carotene). Combined analyses of these 6 nsSNPs and 3 micronutrients showed significant association with TNBC: odds ratios = 2.77 (95% confidence interval = 1.01-7.64) and 10.89 (95% confidence interval = 3.50-33.89) for 2 and at least 3 risk factors, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to suggest that multiple genetic and nutritional factors are associated with TNBC, particularly in combination. Our findings, if validated in larger studies, will have important clinical implication that dietary modulations and/or micronutrient supplementations may prevent or reverse TNBC phenotype, so tumors can be treated with less toxic therapeutic strategies, particularly in genetically susceptible women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunkyung Lee
- a Department of Public Health Sciences and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center , University of Miami Miller School of Medicine , Miami , Florida , USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Risk of secondary malignancy (including breast) in patients with mismatch-repair protein deficiency. Am J Surg Pathol 2014; 38:1494-500. [PMID: 24921635 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant inherited disease that is associated with an increased risk for colorectal and endometrial cancer due to germline mutations in mismatch-repair (MMR) genes. Whereas primary tumors in this syndrome are widely recognized, the relative risk(s) of secondary malignancies, particularly breast cancer, in LS patients are still poorly characterized. To provide an improved assessment of these risks, MMR status was evaluated in secondary tumors from a series of patients with index tumors of known MMR status (both proficient and deficient). A total of 1252 tumors (index tumors) and all secondary malignancies were tested for MMR by immunohistochemistry (MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, PMS2) between 1992 and 2013. Tumors with MLH1/PMS2 deficiency were tested for hypermethylation or BRAF mutation, when appropriate. Of the 1252 index tumors, 162 were MMR deficient (dMMR), and, of that subset, 32 secondary tumors were identified (19.7%). In contrast, 80 secondary tumors were identified in the proficient (intact) group (7.3%). Although secondary malignancies were more common in the dMMR group (P=0.0001), there was no trend in tumor type. Specifically, breast cancer was not overly represented in the dMMR group. When secondary tumors had dMMR, they were more likely to have deficiency in MSH2/MSH6 than in MLH1/PMS2 (P=0.01). Of the patients with tumors exhibiting dMMR, women were more likely to have a dMMR secondary tumor in this series (P=0.0001); however, breast cancer was not overly represented, and our study provides no evidence that it is more frequent in LS. MSH2/MSH6 deficiency is more commonly associated with a secondary tumor compared with MLH1/PMS2 deficiency, when methylation/BRAF status is taken into account.
Collapse
|
50
|
Desai A, Xu J, Aysola K, Qin Y, Okoli C, Hariprasad R, Chinemerem U, Gates C, Reddy A, Danner O, Franklin G, Ngozi A, Cantuaria G, Singh K, Grizzle W, Landen C, Partridge EE, Rice VM, Reddy ESP, Rao VN. Epithelial ovarian cancer: An overview. World J Transl Med 2014; 3:1-8. [PMID: 25525571 PMCID: PMC4267287 DOI: 10.5528/wjtm.v3.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2013] [Revised: 01/16/2014] [Accepted: 03/04/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the second most common gynecological cancer and the leading cause of death in the United States. In this article we review the diagnosis and current management of epithelial ovarian cancer which accounts for over 95 percent of the ovarian malignancies. We will present various theories about the potential origin of ovarian malignancies. We will discuss the genetic anomalies and syndromes that may cause ovarian cancers with emphasis on Breast cancer type 1/2 mutations. The pathology and pathogenesis of ovarian carcinoma will also be presented. Lastly, we provide a comprehensive overview of treatment strategies and staging of ovarian cancer, conclusions and future directions.
Collapse
|