Intraindividual Comparison of Selective Arterial versus Venous 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Selective Prostatic Arterial and Intravenous PSMA PET/CT Radioligand Infusions in Primary Prostatic Adenocarcinoma

Background Intravenous prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy improves survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Yet, the impact of selective prostatic arterial administration on primary tumor uptake is unclear. Purpose To compare gallium 68 (68Ga)-PSMA-11 uptake using dynamic PET/CT in prostatic tumoral volumes of interest (VOIs) during intravenous and selective prostatic arterial infusions for individuals with untreated, high-risk prostate cancer. Materials and Methods In this prospective, intraindividual comparative study conducted at an academic medical center, five men aged 58, 61, 64, 66, and 68 years with treatment-naive prostate cancer were enrolled between January 2022 and February 2023 and underwent two dynamic 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT examinations 1 week apart. During the first examination, the radiotracer was administered intravenously. During the second administration, the radiotracer was delivered into either the right or left prostatic artery through an angiographically placed microcatheter. The primary outcome was maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in prostatic tumoral VOIs. The secondary outcomes included mean SUV (SUVmean) in prostatic tumoral VOIs and area under the SUVmean curves (AUC). Longitudinal mixed-effects models were used to compare dynamic SUVmax and SUVmean time-activity curves (TACs), and paired t tests were used for the remaining data. Results The mean SUVmax within tumoral VOIs was 14 (range, 3-43) for venous sessions and 938 (range, 460-1436) for arterial sessions (P = .008). The SUVmean within VOIs was greater during arterial sessions (P < .001) overall and 46-fold and 19-fold greater at peak uptake and final time points, respectively. The mean AUC was greater on arterial TACs than on venous TACs at 14600 SUV × min (range, 8353-20025 SUV × min) and 240 SUV × min (range, 69-622 SUV × min), respectively (P = .002). Conclusion Selective prostatic arterial infusion resulted in greater 68Ga-PSMA-11 tumoral SUV than intravenous infusion. Further study of local-regional, intra-arterial delivery of a PSMA-targeted theranostic agent is warranted in high-risk prostate cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04976257 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Civelek in this issue.

Alpha and Beta Radiation for Theragnostics

Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has significantly evolved from its beginnings with iodine-131 to employing carrier molecules with beta emitting isotopes like lutetium-177. With the success of Lu-177-DOTATATE for neuroendocrine tumors and Lu-177-PSMA-617 for prostate cancer, several other beta emitting radioisotopes, such as Cu-67 and Tb-161, are being explored for TRT. The field has also expanded into targeted alpha therapy (TAT) with agents like radium-223 for bone metastases in prostate cancer, and several other alpha emitter radioisotopes with carrier molecules, such as Ac-225, and Pb-212 under clinical trials. Despite these advancements, the scope of TRT in treating diverse solid tumors and integration with other therapies like immunotherapy remains under investigation. The success of antibody-drug conjugates further complements treatments with TRT, though challenges in treatment optimization continue.

Intra-arterial peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy for neuro-endocrine tumour liver metastases: an in-patient randomised controlled trial (LUTIA)

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE has been shown to effectively prolong progression free survival in grade 1-2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET), but is less efficacious in patients with extensive liver metastases. The aim was to investigate whether tumour uptake in liver metastases can be enhanced by intra-arterial administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE into the hepatic artery, in order to improve tumour response without increasing toxicity.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with grade 1-2 GEP-NET, and bi-lobar liver metastases were randomized to receive intra-arterial PRRT in the left or right liver lobe for four consecutive cycles. The contralateral liver lobe and extrahepatic disease were treated via a "second-pass" effect and the contralateral lobe was used as the control lobe. Up to three metastases (> 3 cm) per liver lobe were identified as target lesions at baseline on contrast-enhanced CT. The primary endpoint was the tumour-to-non-tumour (T/N) uptake ratio on the 24 h post-treatment [177Lu]Lu-SPECT/CT after the first cycle. This was calculated for each target lesion in both lobes using the mean uptake. T/N ratios in both lobes were compared using paired-samples t-test.

FINDINGS

After the first cycle, a non-significant difference in T/N uptake ratio was observed: T/NIA = 17·4 vs. T/Ncontrol = 16·2 (p = 0·299). The mean increase in T/N was 17% (1·17; 95% CI [1·00; 1·37]). Of all patients, 67% (18/27) showed any increase in T/N ratio after the first cycle.

CONCLUSION

Intra-arterial [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is safe, but does not lead to a clinically significant increase in tumour uptake.

Intra-arterial Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for the Treatment of Hepatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastases: Hope or Hype?

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) confers significant progression-free survival advantage for patients with small bowel grade 1 and 2 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD NET). PRRT may also be clinically beneficial for patients with NET of pancreatic, bronchial, and other sites of origin; patients with paragangliomas; as well as for patients with well-differentiated grade 3 NET. Direct intra-arterial (IA) administration of PRRT into the hepatic artery for patients with NET liver metastases may result in higher radiopharmaceutical dose and longer dwell time in the liver tumors while relatively sparing non-tumor liver tissue and other organs such as the kidneys and bone marrow when compared with intravenous (IV) administration. This review summarizes currently available data on IA and IV PRRT dose distribution, reports safety and efficacy of IA PRRT, and proposes future research questions.

Liver-Directed Therapy for Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastases in the Era of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) liver metastases involves a multidisciplinary approach that includes liver-directed therapies (LDT) and systemic treatments, such as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). LDT has demonstrated efficacy in rapidly reducing tumor bulk, improving symptoms, and delaying disease progression. Interventional radiologists should be consulted prior to switching therapy for patients with progressive or symptomatic neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases. Long-term follow-up data on the safety of Yttrium-90 radioembolization before and after PRRT remain limited. Therefore, a more conservative approach may be to preferentially employ transarterial embolization (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients' somatostatin receptor-avid disease who may be future candidates for PRRT. Notable exceptions where radioembolization may be a preferred treatment strategy may be patients with history of biliary tract instrumentation, asymmetric unilobar disease distribution, and rapidly progressive diffuse liver involvement. Selection of local treatment modality, sequencing, and combination of LDT with systemic therapy require further investigation.

A dosimetric comparison of systemic peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and intra-arterial peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with liver dominant gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

OBJECTIVES

Intra-arterial radionuclide therapy (IART) treatment allows direct delivery of 177 Lu-DOTATATE to the overexpressed somatostatin-positive neuroendocrine liver metastases, which led to higher tumour concentration compared with systemic radionuclide therapy (SRT). The aim was to evaluate and compare the absorbed doses of both IART and SRT to organs and hepatic metastatic sites.

METHODS

A total of 48 patients received SRT and IART. In SRT, activity was administered intravenously, whereas in IART, activity was administered directly into hepatic arteries. The sequential whole-body images were acquired at 2, 4, 24, 72 and 160 h. The reconstructed whole-body planar and single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography images were processed using the Dosimetry Toolkit for the estimation of normalized cumulated activity in the organs and tumour lesions. The absorbed dose was computed using OLINDA EXM 2.0 software.

RESULTS

The median absorbed dose (mGy/MBq) of kidneys and spleen in IART was compared with SRT and found to be decreased by 30.7% ( P  = 0.03) and 37.5% ( P  = 0.08), whereas it was found to be increased by 40% ( P  = 0.26) and 8.1% ( P  = 0.28) in the liver and lungs. The median dose (mGy/MBq) of tumours determined in IART was found to be increased by 62.2% ( P  = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

IART with 177 Lu-DOTATATE significantly increases tumour dose while reducing overall systemic toxicity in comparison to SRT treatment. After considering the maximum tolerance limit of kidneys in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, the number of treatment cycles and injected activity can be optimized further with IART for better response and survival.

Intra-Arterial Delivery of Radiopharmaceuticals in Oncology: Current Trends and the Future of Alpha-Particle Therapeutics

A paradigm shift is underway in cancer diagnosis and therapy using radioactivity-based agents called radiopharmaceuticals. In the new strategy, diagnostic imaging measures the tumor uptake of radioactive agent “X” in a patient’s specific cancer, and if uptake metrics are realized, the patient can be selected for therapy with radioactive agent “Y”. The X and Y represent different radioisotopes that are optimized for each application. X–Y pairs are known as radiotheranostics, with the currently approved route of therapy being intravenous administration. The field is now evaluating the potential of intra-arterial dosing of radiotheranostics. In this manner, a higher initial concentration can be achieved at the cancer site, which could potentially enhance tumor-to-background targeting and lead to improved imaging and therapy. Numerous clinical trials are underway to evaluate these new therapeutic approaches that can be performed via interventional radiology. Of further interest is changing the therapeutic radioisotope that provides radiation therapy by β- emission to radioisotopes that also decay by α-particle emissions. Alpha (α)-particle emissions provide high energy transfer to the tumors and have distinct advantages. This review discusses the current landscape of intra-arterially delivered radiopharmaceuticals and the future of α-particle therapy with short-lived radioisotopes.

Determinants of target absorbed dose in radionuclide therapy

In radionuclide therapy, activity kinetics in tissues determine the absorbed doses administered and thus efficacy and side effects of treatment. The objective of this work was to derive expressions for the parameters affecting the absorbed dose to a target tissue for first-order activity kinetics. The activity uptake results from contributions from the first-pass activity flow through the target tissue preceding systemic equilibration and uptake after distribution of the administered compound in the body. The absorbed dose from uptake after equilibration is the product of the mean energy deposited per decay in the target tissue, the time integral of the plasma activity concentration, the plasma volume flow per unit target tissue mass, the probability of activity removal during passage, and the mean lifetime of activity in the target tissue. Quantitative analysis of the determinants of absorbed dose exemplarily for radioiodine therapy indicates that the high uptake often observed in Graves' disease must be associated with high tissue perfusion and removal probability and that administration of stable iodine increases mean lifetime. For therapies with long residence times of the active compound in the blood, such as radioiodine therapy, the contribution of the first-pass is small compared with uptake after equilibration. The relative first-pass contribution is higher for agents that are rapidly eliminated from the blood pool, such as radiolabelled somatostatin analogues, and may dominate after arterial application. Understanding the determining parameters in radionuclide therapy reveals dose-limiting factors and opens up opportunities to optimise and individualize therapy, potentially improving treatment success rates.

Optimisation of radioligand therapy in neuroendocrine tumours: Current and evolving evidence

Treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) with radioligand therapy (RLT) for example, ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE is generally well-tolerated and prolongs time to progression in most patients. However, approximately 20% of patients are nonresponders. In addition, complete responses are rare (<5% of patients), and durable responses beyond 3-4 years are uncommon. This article will discuss factors which may improve the outcomes of PRRT by using biomarkers to identify patients at high risk to be nonresponders (imaging and liquid biomarkers) and will examine mechanisms to potentially improve/optimise current RLT treatment strategies. These include mechanisms to potentiate the effects of RLT, increase tumour absorbed dose, overcoming radio-resistance and upregulation of somatostatin receptors, although larger studies will be required to demonstrate which techniques are going to be most efficacious in clinical practice.

Neuroendocrine Tumors and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: When Is the Right Time?

Since its approval in 2018 by the US Food and Drug Administration, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has become a mainstay in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Lutetium-177-DOTATATE, the only approved agent, is indicated for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors. Although patient selection appears straightforward with somatostatin receptor-positron emission tomography, there is considerable complexity when deciding which patients to treat and when to start PRRT. Herein, we review the many factors that affect patient selection, focusing on the optimal patients to treat. Although significant effort has been expended to determine which patients benefit the most from PRRT, a validated predictive biomarker remains elusive. Although PRRT has been used for more than 2 decades in Europe and standards of care exist for safe treatment, there remain numerous questions regarding when PRRT should be used relative to other treatments. It is important to remember that multidisciplinary discussions are essential. Currently, there are a number of ongoing studies looking to assess the efficacy of PRRT compared with other treatment options and to optimize treatment through combination therapy, different dosing strategies, or use of different radionuclides and radioligands.

Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Radiolabeled Peptides-Where Are We Now

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been one of the most successful and exciting examples of theranostics in nuclear medicine in recent decades and is now firmly embedded in many treatment algorithms for unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) worldwide. It is widely considered to be an effective treatment for well- or moderately differentiated neoplasms, which express high levels of somatostatin receptors that can be selectively targeted. This review article outlines the scientific basis of PRRT in treatment of NENs and describes its discovery dating back to the early 1990s. Early treatments utilizing Indium-111, a γ-emitter, showed promise in reduction in tumor size and improvement in biochemistry, but were also met with high radiation doses and myelotoxic and nephrotoxic effects. Subsequently, stable conjugation of DOTA-peptides with β-emitting radionuclides, such as Yttrium-90 and Lutetium-177, served as a breakthrough for PRRT and studies highlighted their potential in eliciting progression-free survival and quality of life benefits. This article will also elaborate on the key trials which paved the way for its approval and will discuss therapeutic considerations, such as patient selection and administration technique, to optimize its use.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies

Simple Summary

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic treatment consisting of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. This will subsequently cause lethal DNA damage to the tumor cell. The only target that is currently used in widespread clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor, which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical applications of PRRT, and discusses several PRRT-optimization strategies.

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. The only target that is currently used in clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor (SSTR), which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review provides a summary of the treatment efficacy (e.g., response rates and symptom-relief), impact on patient outcome and toxicity profile of PRRT performed with different generations of SSTR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, including the landmark randomized-controlled trial NETTER-1. In addition, multiple optimization strategies for PRRT are discussed, i.e., the dose–effect concept, dosimetry, combination therapies (i.e., tandem/duo PRRT, chemoPRRT, targeted molecular therapy, somatostatin analogues and radiosensitizers), new radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., SSTR-antagonists, Evans-blue containing vector molecules and alpha-emitters), administration route (intra-arterial versus intravenous) and response prediction via molecular testing or imaging. The evolution and continuous refinement of PRRT resulted in many lessons for the future development of radionuclide therapy aimed at other targets and tumor types.

Dosimetric analyses of intra-arterial versus standard intravenous administration of 177Lu-DOTATATE in patients of well differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with liver-dominant metastatic disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to perform calculation of the absorbed doses to organs at risk and to neuroendocrine tumors and to determine whether hepatic intra-arterial (IA) injection of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) would achieve higher intratumoral concentrations than standard intravenous administration of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE.

METHODS

29 patients with Grade I-II, inoperable, metastatic gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEPNET) were prospectively identified and enrolled for the study. 15 patients of GEPNETs with liver-dominant metastatic disease and less than 3 sites of extrahepatic metastatic disease were administered a single dose of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE therapy through the selective catheterization of the hepatic artery (IA group). The other 14 patients received a single dose of ¹⁷⁷ Lu- DOTATATE through standard intravenous route (IV group). For dosimetry, whole-body γ (anterior and posterior planar acquisitions) and SPECT/CT scans of the abdomen at 2, 24 and 96 h post ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE administration were acquired. Dosimetric calculations were done using the HERMES software.

RESULTS

The mean dose per unit activity (DpA) in the liver and tumor lesions in the IA group differed significantly (p < 0.05) but differed insignificantly in spleen and kidneys (p > 05) with the IV group. The mean tumor/non-tumor concentration at 96 h was 76.83 ± 7.9 (range 10.2-251.3) in the IA group whereas it was 25.6 ± 5.9 (Range: 12-55) in the IV group. There was an average threefold increase in tumoral concentration over the standard intravenous group.

CONCLUSION

IA administration of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE results in higher concentration and absorbed dose in hepatic metastases in patients of GEPNETs as compared to a single dose of PRRT administered through standard IV route, and thus seems to be a powerful tool to improve the efficacy of PRRT.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Measurement of the dose received by the tumor lesions and the critical organs is of paramount importance for the prognostication of a radionuclide therapy. Scant data exist on the dosimetric impact of IA administration of the therapy with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE on the tumors and other organs, and this study would add an impact towards the better treatment outcome in patients of neuroendocrine tumor with liver-dominant metastatic disease.

Radiopharmaceuticals for Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that originate in endocrine tissues throughout the body. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic disease refractory to standard of care treatment. The landmark international phase III NETTER-1 trial led to the approval of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera) in the treatment of somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic NETs. Similarly, data from the multicenter, phase II Study IB12B led to the approval of meta-[¹³¹I]Iodo-Benzyl-Guanidine (^I31I-MIBG) for treatment of iobenguane scan-positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. With the clinical approval of these novel radiopharmaceuticals for managing select patients with NETs, additional studies are needed to refine patient selection, predict and assess therapy response, and optimize radiopharmaceutical delivery and clinical outcomes.

Internal Radiation Therapy

Targeted therapies are applied to increase the efficiency of antitumor treatment by simultaneously decreasing side effects. This can be achieved using carrier molecules which specifically bind to target structures or areas with remodeling activity. These carrier molecules may be coupled to chemotherapeutic drugs or to radioactive isotopes. In most cases, these carrier molecules are antibodies against tumor antigens, peptides, or small molecules which are binders for overexpressed receptors on tumor cells. The paradigm of endoradiotherapy is exemplified by the peptidic tracer DOTATOC which binds to somatostatin receptors and recently also small molecule inhibitors with high affinity for the prostate-specific membrane antigen.

Intraarterial Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Using 90Y-DOTATOC for Hepatic Metastases of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Given the high frequency of liver metastases in neuroendocrine tumor patients, we aimed to determine whether hepatic intraarterial administration of ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) would increase treatment efficacy while reducing systemic toxicity compared with systemic toxicity from intravenous administration as previously reported in the literature. Methods: PRRT-naïve adult neuroendocrine tumor patients with liver-dominant metastases were enrolled in a prospective single-center, open-label pilot study. The patients underwent baseline PET/CT using intravenous ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC. Then, 3.5 ± 0.2 GBq (94.7 ± 5.4 mCi) of ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC were administered into the proper hepatic artery over 30 min. The first 5 patients also received intraarterial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC and underwent PET/CT. All patients were followed for response (RECIST, version 1.1) (primary aim 2, safety) and toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) (primary aim 1, efficacy) for at least 6 mo, with optional follow-up for up to 1 y. In the subset of 5 patients who underwent both intravenous and intraarterial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, tumor SUV_max was compared between intravenous and intraarterial administration for hepatic tumors, intrahepatic tumors, and uninvolved background organs (secondary aim, intravenous vs. intraarterial uptake). Results: The study was terminated after a planned analysis of the first 10 patients because of lack of efficacy. The best response was stable disease in 90% (9/10 patients) and progressive disease in 10% (1/10 patients) at 3 mo, and stable disease in 8 of 10 patients and progressive disease in 2 of 10 patients at 6 mo. One additional patient developed progressive disease after the 6-mo follow-up period but within the optional 1-y follow-up period. No partial response or complete response was observed. The 2 patients with the highest liver tumor burden died within 6 mo of treatment, with treatment considered a possible contributor. Patients who received intraarterial administration failed to demonstrate higher uptake by hepatic metastases than patients who received intravenous administration, with a median intraarterial-to-intravenous SUV_max ratio of 0.81 (range, 0.36-2.09) on a lesion level. Conclusion: Our study found that administration of PRRT via the proper hepatic artery did not reproduce the increase in hepatic tumor uptake that was previously reported. In addition, the single treatment using ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC did not induce tumor shrinkage, indicating that more treatment cycles may be required. Possible safety concerns in patients with a high liver tumor burden should inform patient selection for future studies.

Intra-arterial versus standard intravenous administration of lutetium-177-DOTA-octreotate in patients with NET liver metastases: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (LUTIA trial)

BACKGROUND

Lutetium-177-DOTA-octreotate (¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE) significantly increases survival and response rates in patients with grade I and grade II neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, survival and response rates are significantly lower in patients with bulky liver metastases. Increasing the tumor-absorbed dose in liver metastases may improve response to ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. The LUTIA (Lutetium Intra-Arterial) study aims to increase the tumor-absorbed dose in liver metastases by intra-arterial (IA) administration of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, compared to conventional intravenous (IV) administration.

METHODS

A multicenter, within-patient randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 26 patients with progressive, liver-dominant, unresectable grade I or grade II NET will be conducted. Patients with bilobar bulky disease will be randomly allocated to receive IA treatment into either the left or the right hepatic artery. Using this approach, one liver lobe will be treated intra-arterially (first-pass effect), while the contralateral lobe will receive an intravenous treatment as a second-pass effect. The primary endpoint of this study is the difference in tumor-to-non-tumor ratio of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE uptake between the two liver lobes on post-treatment SPECT/CT (IA versus IV). Secondary endpoints include absorbed dose in both liver lobes, tumor response, dose-response relationship, toxicity, uptake in extrahepatic lesions, and renal uptake.

DISCUSSION

This multicenter, within-patient RCT will investigate whether IA administration of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE results in a higher activity concentration in liver metastases compared to IV administration.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03590119. Registered on 17 July 2018.

Predictive Value of 99MTC-hynic-toc Scintigraphy in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumor Diagnosis

Background:

Νeuroendocrine tumors of the lungs are rare arising in the thymus and gastro-entero-pancreatic tract and belonging to foregut of neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of the present prospective study was to estimate the potential impact of single-photon emission computed tomography somatostatin receptor scintigraphy using 99mTc-Tektrotyd on diagnosis, treatment response, and prognosis in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the lungs.

Methods:

Thirty-six patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the lungs were evaluated by using 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC scintigraphy. The scintigraphic results were compared to liver tissue uptake (Krenning score). Likewise, the functional imaging results were compared with biochemical indices including chromogranin A, neuroendocrine-specific enolase, and insulin-like growth factor 1 at the time of diagnosis (baseline) and disease progression.

Results:

The number of somatostatin receptors, expressed with Krenning score, did not show any correlation with the survival of patients both at baseline (P = .08) and at disease progression (P = .24), and scintigraphy results did not relate significantly to progression-free survival. Comparing the results of 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC scintigraphy according to the response of patients in the initial treatment, a statistically significant negative correlation was observed both in the first and in the second scintigraphy with patients’ response (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). The concentrations of biochemical markers were in accordance with scintigraphy results in the diagnosis.

Conclusion:

This study indicates that 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC scintigraphy appears to be a reliable, noninvasive technique for detection of primary neuroendocrine tumors and their locoregional or distant metastases, although it cannot be used as a neuroendocrine tumors of the lungs predictive technique.

Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Intraarterial Combined With Intravenous Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma may express somatostatin receptors (SSTR). We present a case with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the liver, bone, and lymph nodes. The patient was in progression after chemotherapy, external beam radiation therapy (ERBT), atezolizumab, and cetuximab. Due to strong SSTR expression of the metastases, PRRT was applied. After 3 cycles of intravenous Lu-DOTATOC and 1 cycle of intraarterial Y-DOTATOC therapy, the hepatic and bone metastases showed excellent response after PRRT. No nephrotoxicity or myelotoxicity was observed.

Phenomenon of Endothelial Antibody Capture: Principles and Potential for Locoregional Targeting of Hepatic Tumors

The systemic drug circulation represents a source of adverse effects during tumor targeting. We studied the binding efficacy of endothelium-specific antibodies after a very short contact with an antigen target, along with assessing the intravascular capture and targeting potential of these antibodies after locoregional injection. Fast-binding anti-CD 146 (clone ME-9F1) and anti-CD31 (clone 390) antibodies were selected based on histological analysis of their binding activity. The efficacy of antibody capture by hepatic endothelium under different conditions was analyzed using an isolated liver perfusion model. The local enrichment of R-phycoerythrin and ¹²⁵ I-conjugated antibody was studied in vivo in two hepatic tumor models using biodistribution, scintigraphic imaging, and fluorescence microscopy. Upon injection into the tumor-feeding artery, the antibody was immediately captured in the microvasculature during the first passage. At doses not exceeding the saturation level of endothelial epitopes, the capture efficacy was almost 90%. We showed that the efficacy of endothelial capture is controlled by factors such as antibody affinity, number of binding sites on the endothelium, and microvascular flow rate. The targeting potential of endothelial capture was experimentally proven in vivo using scintigraphic imaging and biodistribution analysis after locoregional intra-arterial injection of ¹²⁵ I-labeled antibodies in hepatic tumor models. Conclusion: The unique phenomenon of endothelial capture can broadly prevent systemic circulation of the antibody or antibody-drug conjugates applied by intravascular injection and may have specific relevance for targeting of hepatic tumors.

Theranostics in neuroendocrine tumours: somatostatin receptor imaging and therapy

Theranostics and its principles: pre-treatment selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment by the use of a related, specific diagnostic test are integral to the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). This is due to NETs' important, but variable, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression, their heterogeneity and variation in site of primary and rate of progression. Only patients whose tumours have sufficient expression of SSTRs will benefit from SSTR-based radionuclide therapy and demonstrating this expression prior to therapy is essential. This article provides a relevant overview of NETs and the multiple facets of SSTR based theranostics, including imaging and therapy radionuclides; clinical efficacy and toxicity; patient selection and treatment and finally emerging radiopharmaceuticals and newer clinical applications.

Peptide Receptor Radiotherapy Comes of Age

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a form of systemic radiotherapy shown to be effective in treating neuroendocrine tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. The NETTER-1 trial was the first randomized phase III clinical trial evaluating a radiolabeled somatostatin analog, and demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival among patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE versus high-dose octreotide. This article discusses the evolution of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, side effects, and potential future treatment approaches.

Glu-Ureido-Based Inhibitors of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: Lessons Learned During the Development of a Novel Class of Low-Molecular-Weight Theranostic Radiotracers

In recent years, several radioligands targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have been clinically introduced as a new class of theranostic radiopharmaceuticals for the treatment of prostate cancer (PC). In the second decade of the 21^st century, a new era in nuclear medicine was initiated by the clinical introduction of small-molecule PSMA inhibitor radioligands, 40 y after the clinical introduction of ¹⁸F-FDG. Because of the high incidence and mortality of PC, the new PSMA radioligands have already had a remarkable impact on the clinical management of PC. For the continuing clinical development and long-term success of theranostic agents, designing modern prospective clinical trials in theranostic nuclear medicine is essential. First-in-human studies with PSMA radioligands derived from small-molecule PSMA inhibitors showed highly sensitive imaging of PSMA-positive PC by means of PET and SPECT as well as a dramatic response of metastatic castration-resistant PC after PSMA radioligand therapy. This tremendous success logically led to the initiation of prospective clinical trials with several PSMA radioligands. Meanwhile, MIP-1404, PSMA-11, 2-(3-{1-carboxy-5-[(6-fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid (DCFPyL), PSMA-617, PSMA-1007, and others have entered or will enter prospective clinical trials soon in several countries. The significance becomes apparent by, for example, the considerable increase in the number of publications about PSMA-targeted PET imaging from 2013 to 2016 (e.g., a search of the Web of Science for "PSMA" AND "PET" found only 19 publications in 2013 but 218 in 2016). Closer examination of the initial success of PC treatment with PSMA inhibitor radiotracers leads to several questions from the basic research perspective as well as from the perspective of clinical demands: What lessons have been learned regarding the design of PSMA radioligands that have already been developed? Has an acceptable compromise between optimal PSMA radioligand design and a broad range of clinical demands been reached? Can the lessons learned from multiple successes within the PSMA experience be transferred to further theranostic approaches?

Merkel Cell Carcinoma Therapeutic Update

OPINION STATEMENT

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine tumor of the skin. Early-stage disease can be cured with surgical resection and radiotherapy (RT). Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important staging tool, as a microscopic MCC is frequently identified. Adjuvant RT to the primary excision site and regional lymph node bed may improve locoregional control. However, newer studies confirm that patients with biopsy-negative sentinel lymph nodes may not benefit from regional RT. Advanced MCC currently lacks a highly effective treatment as responses to chemotherapy are not durable. Recent work suggests that immunotherapy targeting the programmed cell death receptor 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) checkpoint holds great promise in treating advanced MCC and may provide durable responses in a portion of patients. At the same time, high-throughput sequencing studies have demonstrated significant differences in the mutational profiles of tumors with and without the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV). An important secondary endpoint in the ongoing immunotherapy trials for MCC will be determining if there is a response difference between the virus-positive MCC tumors that typically lack a large mutational burden and the virus-negative tumors that have a large number of somatic mutations and predicted tumor neoantigens. Interestingly, sequencing studies have failed to identify a highly recurrent activated driver pathway in the majority of MCC tumors. This may explain why targeted therapies can demonstrate exceptional responses in case reports but fail when treating all comers with MCC. Ultimately, a precision medicine approach may be more appropriate for treating MCC, where identified driver mutations are used to direct targeted therapies. At a minimum, stratifying patients in future clinical trials based on tumor viral status should be considered as virus-negative tumors are more likely to harbor activating driver mutations.

Semi-automatic 3D-volumetry of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors to improve combination therapy with 177Lu-DOTATOC and 90Y-DOTATOC

PURPOSE

Patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) often present with disseminated liver metastases and can be treated with a number of different nuclides or nuclide combinations in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) depending on tumor load and lesion diameter. For quantification of disseminated liver lesions, semi-automatic lesion detection is helpful to determine tumor burden and tumor diameter in a time efficient manner. Here, we aimed to evaluate semi-automated measurement of total metastatic burden for therapy stratification.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with liver metastasized NET underwent contrast-enhanced 1.5 T MRI using gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. Liver metastases (n=1537) were segmented using Fraunhofer MEVIS Software for three-dimensional (3D) segmentation. All lesions were stratified according to longest 3D diameter >20 mm or ≤20 mm and relative contribution to tumor load was used for therapy stratification.

RESULTS

Mean count of lesions ≤20 mm was 67.5 and mean count of lesions >20 mm was 13.4. However, mean contribution to total tumor volume of lesions ≤20 mm was 24%, while contribution of lesions >20 mm was 76%.

CONCLUSION

Semi-automatic lesion analysis provides useful information about lesion distribution in predominantly liver metastasized NET patients prior to PRRT. As conventional manual lesion measurements are laborious, our study shows this new approach is more efficient and less operator-dependent and may prove to be useful in the decision making process selecting the best combination PRRT in each patient.

Twins in spirit part IV - [177Lu] high affinity DOTATATE. A promising new tracer for peptide receptor radiotherapy?

AIM

Besides the use of somatostatin analogues, small molecules like sunitinib and everolimus as well as conventional chemotherapy, peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) using radiolabelled somatostatin analogues has gained an important role in the treatment of inoperable, metastasized neuroendocrine tumours (NET). There are various radiotracers in use. Based on our experience with the PET tracer [⁶⁸Ga]DOTA-3-iodo-Tyr³-octreotate ([⁶⁸Ga]HA-DOTATATE), a DOTATATE derivative with an increased binding affinity to hsst5, the current retrospective analysis is exploring the therapeutic potential of [¹⁷⁷Lu]HA-DOTATATE.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with metastatic NET (G1/G2) were treated using [¹⁷⁷Lu]DOTATATE and/or [¹⁷⁷Lu]HA-DOTATATE, and dosimetric results of both tracers were compared.

RESULTS

Using [¹⁷⁷Lu]HA-DOTATATE, a mean tumour dose of 5.34 Gy/GBq (median 2.53 Gy/GBq; range 0.89-33.3 Gy/GBq) was achieved, while [¹⁷⁷Lu]DOTATATE delivered a tumour dose of 5.53 Gy/GBq (median 2.70 Gy/GBq; range 0.44-15.3 Gy/GBq). Organ doses for [¹⁷⁷Lu]HA-DOTATATE vs. [¹⁷⁷Lu]DOTATATE were as follows: kidney 2.31 ± 0.85 vs. 2.03 ± 0.96 Gy/GBq, liver 1.06 ± 0.79 vs. 1.67 ± 1.73 Gy/GBq, spleen 3.89 ± 4.04 vs. 4.50 ± 3.69 Gy/GBq and whole body 0.16 ± 0.10 Gy/GBq vs. 0.15 ± 0.08 Gy/GBq. Tumour-to-kidney dose ratio was slightly higher for [¹⁷⁷Lu]DOTATATE (2.4 ± 5.6) compared to [¹⁷⁷Lu]HA-DOTATATE (1.5 ± 3.6).

CONCLUSION

Both tracers showed marked inter-patient variation in their dosimetry, and no significant differences in dosimetry of [¹⁷⁷Lu]HA-DOTATATE and [¹⁷⁷Lu]DOTATATE were observed when taking all patients into account. Thus, [¹⁷⁷Lu]HA-DOTATATE appears viable for PRRT, although it was marginally inferior regarding kidney dose and tumour-to-kidney dose ratio compared to the established [¹⁷⁷Lu]DOTATATE.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogue Therapy Of Gastroenteropancreatic Cancer

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been utilized for more than two decades and has been accepted as an effective therapeutic modality in the treatment of inoperable or metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) or neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The two most commonly used radiopeptides for PRRT, (90)Y-octreotide and (177)Lu-octreotate, produce disease-control rates of 68%-94%, with progression-free survival rates that compare favorably with chemotherapy, somatostatin analogues, and newer targeted therapies. In addition, biochemical and symptomatic responses are commonly observed. In general, PRRT is well tolerated with only low to moderate toxicity in most individuals. In line with the need to place PRRT in the therapeutic sequence of gastroenteropancreatic NENs, a recently sponsored phase III randomized trial in small intestine NENs treated with (177)Lu-octreotate vs high-dose octreotide long-acting release demonstrated that (177)Lu-octreotate significantly improved progression-free survival. Other strategies that are presently being developed include combinations with targeted therapies or chemotherapy, intra-arterial PRRT, and salvage treatments. Sophisticated molecular tools need to be incorporated into the management strategy to more effectively define therapeutic efficacy and for an early identification of adverse events. The strategy of randomized controlled trials is a key issue to standardize the treatment and establish the position of PRRT in the therapeutic algorithm of NENs.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a promising new treatment modality for inoperable or metastasized gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors patients. Most studies report objective response rates in 15% to 35% of patients. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compare favorably with that for somatostatin analogues, chemotherapy, or newer, "targeted" therapies. Prospective, randomized data regarding the potential PFS and OS benefit of PRRT compared with standard therapies is anticipated.

Comparison of 111In-[DTPA0]Octreotide Versus Non Carrier Added 177Lu- [DOTA0,Tyr3]-Octreotate Efficacy in Patients With GEP-NET Treated Intra-arterially for Liver Metastases

AIM

In patients with progressive, metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET), intra-arterial radionuclide infusions with high activities of In-[DTPA]-octreotide and more recently with non-carrier added (nca) Lu-[DOTA,Tyr]-octreotate have been performed with encouraging results. However, the affinity profiles (IC50) of these radiopeptides for human sst2 receptors are markedly different (In-[DTPA]-octreotide, 22 ± 3.6 nM and nca Lu-[DOTA,Tyr]-octreotate, 1.5 ± 4.0 nM). The total administered activity is determined by organ dose limits (kidneys and bone marrow), and our aim therefore was to compare and evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of both radiopeptides in metastatic NETs.

METHODS

Thirty patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) somatostatin-positive NETs with liver metastases confirmed on biopsy and In-pentetreotide scan were included. They were treated with In-[DTPA]-octreotide (n = 17) or nca Lu-[DOTA,Tyr]-octreotate (n = 13). Blood samples were collected 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours postadministration to calculate residence time in blood and in red marrow. The maximum percentage uptake in organs and tumors was estimated by region of interest analysis, and tumor dosimetry calculations were performed using OLINDA/EXM/ 1.0 software.

RESULTS

ncaLu-[DOTA,Tyr3]-octreotate blood radioactivity, expressed as a percentage of the injected dose, was significantly lower than In-[DTPA]-octreotide (P < 0.05), as clearly depicted from the time-activity curves; the background-corrected tumor uptake was significantly higher than In-[DTPA]-octreotide but without any significant difference in other organs (spleen, kidneys, and liver).

CONCLUSIONS

Using Lu-[DOTA,Tyr]-octreotate, a 3-fold higher absorbed dose to tumor tissue was achieved compared with In-[DTPA] octreotide. Residence time of nca Lu-[DOTA,Tyr]-octreotate results in a significantly higher absorbed dose to bone marrow compared with In-[DTPA]-octreotide. However, a drawback of In-[DTPA]-octreotide therapy is that the number of administrations would need to be almost doubled to achieve an equal therapeutic outcome as compared with Lu-[DOTA,Tyr]-octreotate.

Qualitative and quantitative image analysis of CT and MR imaging in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases in comparison to (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET

PURPOSE

To compare lesion conspicuity in patients with liver metastases arising from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) using MRI, PET and CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

16 patients with GEP-NETs were evaluated using non-contrast MRI, contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI using Gd-EOB-DTPA and CE-(68)Ga-DOTATOC PET. Quantitative analyses were performed by two blinded readers using ROI-analyses quantifying contrast ratios (CR) between normal liver-tissue and GEP-NET-metastases. Qualitative analyses were performed evaluating primary visibility and spatial detectability of all lesions.

RESULTS

103 of the same liver metastases were detected on all modalities. Qualitatively, lesion conspicuity was superior on CE-MRI imaging compared to non-contrast MR-sequences (T2, DWI, fl2D, fl3D), as well as arterial- and portal-venous phase CT. Concerning detectability of lesions, CE-MRI was superior to all other modalities. The quantitative ROI-analysis demonstrated improved CR for DWI compared to all other non-contrast MR-sequences (p<0.001). CE-MRI presented with higher CR-values compared to CE-(68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic imaging using non contrast MRI with fl2D-and fl3D-sequences in combination with the molecular imaging modality (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET is optimal for the assessment of liver lesions in GEP-NET-patients. Even though CE-MRI was superior to non-contrast MRI, non-contrast MRI is sufficient to detect and quantify liver metastases in daily routine, especially in combination with DW-Imaging.

Multimodal imaging for early functional response assessment of (90)Y-/ (177)Lu-DOTATOC peptide receptor targeted radiotherapy with DW-MRI and (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the utility of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI), diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI), and (68)Ga-DOTATOC positron emission tomography/computer tomography ((68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT) in the assessment of response to loco-regional peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) with (90)Y-/(177)Lu-DOTATOC in patients with hepatic metastases from gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET).

PROCEDURES

CE-MRI, DW-MRI, and (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT images were acquired before and 3 months after one to two cycles of intra-arterial (90)Y-/(177)Lu-DOTATOC therapy in 14 patients (nine female, five male; mean age, 54 ± 9 years; range, 41-69 years) with hepatic metastases from GEP-NET. A total of 38 liver metastases were defined as target lesions for which the longest diameter, mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were assessed. Based on changes in size on follow-up imaging, target lesions were classified as responding (RL) or nonresponding (NRL). Relative changes in tumor size, ADCmean, and SUVmax were compared between the two subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 27 responding and 11 nonresponding lesions were successfully evaluated. Mean ADCmean increased significantly in RL (p = 0.011) as well as NRL (p = 0.025). A significant correlation was found between baseline ADCmean and both the percent ADCmean change (p = 0.033) and decrease in lesion size after therapy (diameter p = 0.006; volume p = 0.002). SUVmax of RL declined significantly by 24.1 % (p = 0.014) and remained nearly unchanged in NRL. The change of SUVmax correlated significantly with the pretreatment SUVmax (p < 0.001) and the change in lesion diameter (p = 0.009). NRL with an ADCmean change >0.31 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s on first follow-up imaging showed a decrease in size in the long-term course.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that both DW-MRI and DOTATOC-PET imaging provide potential biomarkers for early assessment of treatment and stratification of therapy response, but that DW-MRI should be interpreted only in combination with SSTR expression and morphologic changes.

GEPNETs update: Radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a promising new treatment modality for inoperable or metastasized gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) patients. Most studies report objective response rates in 15-35% of patients. Also, outcome in terms of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival compares very favorably with that for somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, or new, 'targeted' therapies. They also compare favorably to PFS data for liver-directed therapies. Two decades after the introduction of PRRT, there is a growing need for randomized controlled trials comparing PRRT to 'standard' treatment, that is treatment with agents that have proven benefit when tested in randomized trials. Combining PRRT with liver-directed therapies or with targeted therapies could improve treatment results. The question to be answered, however, is whether a combination of therapies performed within a limited time-span from one another results in a better PFS than a strategy in which other therapies are reserved until after (renewed) tumor progression. Randomized clinical trials comparing PRRT with other treatment modalities should be undertaken to determine the best treatment options and treatment sequelae for patients with GEPNETs.

²¹³Bi-DOTATOC receptor-targeted alpha-radionuclide therapy induces remission in neuroendocrine tumours refractory to beta radiation: a first-in-human experience

Purpose

Radiopeptide therapy using a somatostatin analogue labelled with a beta emitter such as ⁹⁰Y/¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC is a new therapeutic option in neuroendocrine cancer. Alternative treatments for patients with refractory disease are rare. Here we report the first-in-human experience with ²¹³Bi-DOTATOC targeted alpha therapy (TAT) in patients pretreated with beta emitters.

Methods

Seven patients with progressive advanced neuroendocrine liver metastases refractory to treatment with ⁹⁰Y/¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC were treated with an intraarterial infusion of ²¹³Bi-DOTATOC, and one patient with bone marrow carcinosis was treated with a systemic infusion of ²¹³Bi-DOTATOC. Haematological, kidney and endocrine toxicities were assessed according to CTCAE criteria. Radiological response was assessed with contrast-enhanced MRI and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT. More than 2 years of follow-up were available in seven patients.

Results

The biodistribution of ²¹³Bi-DOTATOC was evaluable with 440 keV gamma emission scans, and demonstrated specific tumour binding. Enduring responses were observed in all treated patients. Chronic kidney toxicity was moderate. Acute haematotoxicity was even less pronounced than with the preceding beta therapies.

Conclusion

TAT can induce remission of tumours refractory to beta radiation with favourable acute and mid-term toxicity at therapeutic effective doses.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00259-014-2857-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using radiolabeled somatostatin analogs: focus on future developments

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) if curative surgery is not an option. A majority of NETs abundantly express somatostatin receptors. Consequently, following administration of somatostatin (SST) analogs labeled with γ-emitting radionuclides, these tumors can be imaged for diagnosis, staging or follow-up purposes. Furthermore, when β-emitting radionuclides are used, radiolabeled peptides (radiopeptides) can also be used for the treatment for NET patients. Even though excellent results have been achieved with PRRT, complete responses are still rare, which means that there is room for improvement. In this review, we highlight some of the directions currently under investigation in pilot clinical studies or in preclinical development to achieve this goal. Although randomized clinical trials are still lacking, early studies have shown that tumor response might be improved by application of other radionuclides, such as α-emitters or radionuclide combinations, or by adjustment of radiopeptide administration routes. Individualized dosimetry and better insight into tumor and normal organ radiation doses may allow adjustment of the amount of administered activity per cycle or the number of treatment cycles, resulting in more personalized treatment schedules. Other options include the application of novel (radiolabeled) SST analogs with improved tumor uptake and radionuclide retention time, or a combination of PRRT with other systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy or treatment with radio sensitizers. Though promising directions appear to bring improvements of PRRT within reach, additional research (including randomized clinical trials) is needed to achieve such improvements.

Selective intra-arterial administration of ¹⁸F-FDG to the rat brain -- effects on hemispheric uptake

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to investigate the radioligand uptake and iodine contrast distribution in the intra- and extracranial circulation of the rat, after intra-arterial injections to the common carotid artery and different parts of the internal carotid artery.

Methods

All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with Karolinska Institutet’s guidelines and were approved by the local laboratory animal ethics committee. We used clinical neurointerventional systems to place microcatheters in the extra- or intracranial carotid artery of 15 Sprague–Dawley rats. Here, injection dynamics of iodine contrast was assessed using digital subtraction angiography. Maintaining the catheter position, the animals were placed in a micro PET and small-animal positron emission tomography (PET) was used to analyze injections [2-¹⁸F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG).

Results

Microcatheters had to be placed in the intracranial carotid artery (iICA) for the infusate to distribute to the brain. Selective injection via the iICA resulted in a 9-fold higher uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG in the injected hemisphere (p < 0.005) compared to both intravenous and more proximal carotid artery injections. Furthermore, selective injection gave a dramatically improved contrast between the brain and extracranial tissue.

Conclusion

Intra-arterial injection increases the cerebral uptake of a radiotracer dramatically compared to systemic injection. This technique has potential applications for endovascular treatment of malignancies allowing intra-interventional modifications of injection strategy, based on information on tumor perfusion and risk to surrounding normal parenchyma. Furthermore the technique may increase diagnostic sensitivity and avoid problems due to peripheral pharmacological barriers and first passage metabolism of labile tracers.

Treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

The primary treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) is surgery with curative intent or debulking of the tumor mass. In case of metastatic disease, cytoreductive options are limited. A relatively new therapeutic modality, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, is currently available in a number of mostly European centers. Complete and partial responses obtained after treatment with [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide are in the same range as after treatment with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate (i.e. 10-30%). However, significant nephrotoxicity has been observed after treatment with [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide. Options to improve PRRT may include combinations of radioactive labeled somatostatin analogs, intra-arterial administration, and the use of radiosensitizing drugs combined with PRRT. Other therapeutic applications of PRRT may include additional therapy cycles in patients with progressive disease after benefit from initial therapy, PRRT in adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, or PRRT combined with new targeted therapies, such as sunitinib or everolimus. Randomized clinical trials comparing PRRT with other treatment modalities, or comparing various radioactive labeled somatostatin analogs should be undertaken to determine the best treatment options and treatment sequelae for patients with GEPNETs.

Lutetium-labelled peptides for therapy of neuroendocrine tumours

Treatment with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues is a promising new tool in the management of patients with inoperable or metastasized neuroendocrine tumours. Symptomatic improvement may occur with ¹⁷⁷Lu-labelled somatostatin analogues that have been used for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). The results obtained with ¹⁷⁷Lu-[DOTA⁰,Tyr³]octreotate (DOTATATE) are very encouraging in terms of tumour regression. Dosimetry studies with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE as well as the limited side effects with additional cycles of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE suggest that more cycles of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE can be safely given. Also, if kidney-protective agents are used, the side effects of this therapy are few and mild and less than those from the use of ⁹⁰Y-[DOTA⁰,Tyr³]octreotide (DOTATOC). Besides objective tumour responses, the median progression-free survival is more than 40 months. The patients' self-assessed quality of life increases significantly after treatment with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. Lastly, compared to historical controls, there is a benefit in overall survival of several years from the time of diagnosis in patients treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. These findings compare favourably with the limited number of alternative therapeutic approaches. If more widespread use of PRRT can be guaranteed, such therapy may well become the therapy of first choice in patients with metastasized or inoperable neuroendocrine tumours.

Hepatic arterial infusion enhances DOTATOC radiopeptide therapy in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases

Intravenously administered radiolabeled peptides targeting somatostatin receptors are used for the treatment of unresectable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Recently, we demonstrated a high first-pass effect during intra-arterial (i.a.) administration of positron emission tomography (PET) labeled (68)Ga-DOTA(0)-d-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide (DOTATOC). In this pilot study, we investigated the therapeutic effectiveness of arterial administered DOTATOC, labeled with the therapeutic β emitters (90)Y and (177)Lu. (90)Y- and/or (177)Lu-DOTATOC were infused into the hepatic artery of 15 patients with liver metastases arising from GEP-NETs. Response was assessed using DOTATOC-PET, multiphase contrast enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and the serum tumor marker chromogranin A. Pharmacokinetic data of the arterial approach were assessed using (111)In-DOTATOC scans. With the treatment regime of this pilot study, complete remission was achieved in one (7%) patient and partial remission was observed in eight (53%) patients, six patients were classified as stable (40%; response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria). The concomitant decrease of elevated serum tumor marker confirmed the radiologic response. Median time to progression was not reached within a mean follow-up period of 20 months. Receptor saturation and redistribution effects were identified as limiting factors for i.a. DOTATOC therapy. The high rate of objective radiologic response in NET patients treated with arterial infusion of (90)Y-/(177)Lu-DOTATOC compares favorably with systemic chemotherapy and intravenous radiopeptide therapy. While i.a. DOTATOC therapy is only applicable to patients with tumors of limited anatomic distribution, the results of this pilot study are a promising development in the treatment of GEP-NET and warrants further investigation of this novel approach.