A feasibility study of bevacizumab plus dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in early-stage breast cancer

Targeting breast tumor extracellular matrix and stroma utilizing nanoparticles

Breast cancer is a complicated malignancy and is known as the most common cancer in women. Considerable experiments have been devoted to explore the basic impacts of the tumor stroma, particularly the extracellular matrix (ECM) and stromal components, on tumor growth and resistance to treatment. ECM is made up of an intricate system of proteins, glycosaminoglycans, and proteoglycans, and maintains structural support and controls key signaling pathways involved in breast tumors. ECM can block different drugs such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy drugs from entering the tumor stroma. Furthermore, the stromal elements, such as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), immune cells, and blood vessels, have crucial impacts on tumor development and therapeutic resistance. Recently, promising outcomes have been achieved in using nanotechnology for delivering drugs to tumor stroma and crossing ECM in breast malignancies. Nanoparticles have various benefits for targeting the breast tumor stroma, such as improved permeability and retention, extended circulation time, and the ability to actively target the area. This review covers the latest developments in nanoparticle therapies that focus on breast tumor ECM and stroma. We will explore different approaches using nanoparticles to target the delivery of anticancer drugs like chemotherapy, small molecule drugs, various antitumor products, and other specific synthetic therapeutic agents to the breast tumor stroma. Furthermore, we will investigate the utilization of nanoparticles in altering the stromal elements, such as reprogramming CAFs and immune cells, and also remodeling ECM.

Effectiveness and safety of surgical glove compression therapy as a prophylactic method against nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy

BACKGROUND

We have developed a surgical glove (SG)-compression therapy and reported that this method significantly reduced the overall occurrence of grade 2 or higher nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel (nab-PTX)-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) from 76.1% to 21.4%. In this multicenter single-arm confirmatory study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of SG-compression therapy for the prevention of nab-PTX-induced PN, compared with the incidence of grade 2 or higher PN in published literature as controls.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Primary breast cancer patients who received 260 mg/m² of nab-PTX were eligible for this study. Patients wore two SGs (one size smaller than the tight-fitting size) in each hand for 90 min. PN was evaluated at each treatment cycle using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 and the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ). The temperature of each fingertip was measured using thermography.

RESULTS

Between October 2016 and June 2017, 58 patients were evaluated. The incidence of CTCAE grade 2 or higher PN was as low as 13.8% following SG-compression therapy. A goodness-of-fit test proved that the overall incidence of 13.8% grade 2 or higher PN in this study was comparable to the hypothesis-predicted value (13%). No adverse events, including compression intolerance or skin disorders caused by use of SG, were observed. SG-compression therapy significantly reduced the temperature of each fingertip by 1.3°C-2.3 °C compared to pre-chemotherapy level.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested the safety and efficacy of SG-compression therapy for the amelioration of CIPN.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

UMIN 000024836.

Cardiovascular Complications of Cancer Therapy: Best Practices in Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management: Part 1

Modern cancer therapy has successfully cured many cancers and converted a terminal illness into a chronic disease. Because cancer patients often have coexisting heart diseases, expert advice from cardiologists will improve clinical outcome. In addition, cancer therapy can also cause myocardial damage, induce endothelial dysfunction, and alter cardiac conduction. Thus, it is important for practicing cardiologists to be knowledgeable about the diagnosis, prevention, and management of the cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy. In this first part of a 2-part review, we will review cancer therapy-induced cardiomyopathy and ischemia. This review is based on a MEDLINE search of published data, published clinical guidelines, and best practices in major cancer centers. With the number of cancer survivors expanding quickly, the time has come for cardiologists to work closely with cancer specialists to prevent and treat cancer therapy-induced cardiovascular complications.

A phase II, multicenter, single-arm study of tri-weekly low-dose nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel chemotherapy for patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel is a solvent-free formulation of paclitaxel that is bound to albumin and has demonstrated improved progression free survival in previous studies of breast cancer. However, it is difficult to treat Japanese patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer with the recommended dose of 260 mg/m² of (nab)-paclitaxel for more than six cycles due to the occurrence of adverse events. To evaluate the treatment continuity and safety of low-dose nab-paclitaxel, we conducted a phase II study of nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer who had received up to one prior chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment included low doses of 180 mg/m² nab-paclitaxel that were administered on day 1 of each 3-week cycle to 35 patients. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of six cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 35 eligible patients were enrolled and received a median of eight (range 2-24) cycles of low-dose nab-paclitaxel therapy. The completion rate of six cycles of treatment was 66%. ORR and clinical benefit rate was 23 and 71%, respectively. Median PFS was 6.5 months and median OS was 44 months. Adverse events were relatively mild. Commonly observed grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (46%), leukopenia (9%), and hypertension (3%). No grade 3-4 peripheral sensory neuropathy occurred.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with a low dose of nab-paclitaxel once every 3 weeks was tolerable and of acceptable safety and might be beneficial for patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer.

Tyrosine kinase-targeting drugs-associated heart failure

Background:

The impact of cancer therapies on cardiac disease in the general adult cancer survivor population is largely unknown. Our objective was to evaluate which tyrosine kinase-targeting drugs are associated with greater risk for new-onset heart failure (HF).

Methods:

A nested case–control analysis was conducted within a cohort of 27 992 patients of Clalit Health Services, newly treated with a tyrosine kinase-targeting, and/or chemotherapeutic drug, for a malignant disease, between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2012. Each new case of HF was matched to up to 30 controls from the cohort on calendar year of cohort entry, age, gender, and duration of follow-up. Main outcome measure was odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of new-onset HF.

Results:

There were 936 incident cases of HF during 71 742 person-years of follow-up. Trastuzumab (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.46–2.49), cetuximab (OR 1.72, 1.10–2.69), panitumumab (OR 3.01, 1.02–8.85), and sunitinib (OR 3.39, 1.78–6.47) were associated with increased HF risk. Comorbidity independently associated with higher risk in a multivariable conditional regression model was diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic renal failure, ischaemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, arrhythmia, and smoking.

Conclusions:

Trastuzumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, and sunitinib are associated with increased risk for new-onset HF.

Biomarkers for monitoring chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity

Cardiotoxicity, including acute and late-onset cardiotoxicity, is a well-known adverse effect of many types of antitumor agents. Early identification of patients with cardiotoxicity is important to ensure prompt treatment and minimize toxic effects. The etiology of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity is multifactorial. Traditional methods for assessment of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity typically involve serial measurements of cardiac function via multi-modality imaging techniques. Typically, however, significant left ventricular dysfunction has already occurred when cardiotoxicity is detected by imaging techniques. Biomarkers, most importantly cardiac natriuretic peptides and troponins, are promising markers for identifying patients potentially at risk for clinical heart failure symptoms. This review summarizes the recent progress in clinical utilization of biomarkers for early diagnosis of acute cardiotoxicity and for prediction of late-onset cardiotoxicity. We also discuss the conflicting results of different studies and the association of results with study design.

Evaluation of the effect of compression therapy using surgical gloves on nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy: a phase II multicenter study by the Kamigata Breast Cancer Study Group

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of using surgical glove (SG) compression therapy to prevent nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX)-induced peripheral neuropathy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with primary and recurrent breast cancer who received 260 mg/m² of nab-PTX were eligible for this case-control study. Patients wore two SGs of the same size, i.e., one size smaller than the size that fit their dominant hand, for only 90 min. They did not wear two SGs on the non-dominant hand, which served as the control hand. Peripheral neuropathy was evaluated at each treatment cycle using common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0 and the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire. The temperature of each fingertip of the compression SG-protected hand and control hand was measured using thermography.

RESULTS

Between August 2013 and January 2016, 43 patients were enrolled and 42 were evaluated. The occurrence rates of CTCAE grade 2 or higher sensory and motor peripheral neuropathies were significantly lower for SG-protected hands than for control hands (sensory neuropathy 21.4 vs. 76.1 %; motor neuropathy 26.2 vs. 57.1 %). No patients withdrew from this study because they could not tolerate the compression from the SGs. SG compression therapy significantly decreased the temperature of each fingertip by 1.6-2.2 °C as compared with the temperature before chemotherapy (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

SG compression therapy is effective for reducing nab-PTX-induced peripheral neuropathy. The nab-PTX exposure to the peripheral nerve may be decreased because the SG decreases microvascular flow to the fingertip.

Brief-exposure to preoperative bevacizumab reveals a TGF-β signature predictive of response in HER2-negative breast cancers

To best define biomarkers of response, and to shed insight on mechanism of action of certain clinically important agents for early breast cancer, we used a brief-exposure paradigm in the preoperative setting to study transcriptional changes in patient tumors that occur with one dose of therapy prior to combination chemotherapy. Tumor biopsies from breast cancer patients enrolled in two preoperative clinical trials were obtained at baseline and after one dose of bevacizumab (HER2-negative), trastuzumab (HER2-positive) or nab-paclitaxel, followed by treatment with combination chemo-biologic therapy. RNA-Sequencing based PAM50 subtyping at baseline of 46 HER2-negative patients revealed a strong association between the basal-like subtype and pathologic complete response (pCR) to chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (p ≤ 0.0027), but did not provide sufficient specificity to predict response. However, a single dose of bevacizumab resulted in down-regulation of a well-characterized TGF-β activity signature in every single breast tumor that achieved pCR (p ≤ 0.004). The TGF-β signature was confirmed to be a tumor-specific read-out of the canonical TGF-β pathway using pSMAD2 (p ≤ 0.04), with predictive power unique to brief-exposure to bevacizumab (p ≤ 0.016), but not trastuzumab or nab-paclitaxel. Down-regulation of TGF-β activity was associated with reduction in tumor hypoxia by transcription and protein levels, suggesting therapy-induced disruption of an autocrine-loop between tumor stroma and malignant cells. Modulation of the TGF-β pathway upon brief-exposure to bevacizumab may provide an early functional readout of pCR to preoperative anti-angiogenic therapy in HER2-negative breast cancer, thus providing additional avenues for exploration in both preclinical and clinical settings with these agents.

nab-Paclitaxel dose and schedule in breast cancer

nab-Paclitaxel is approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer on an every-3-week schedule based on positive findings from a pivotal phase III trial in which nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks was superior to solvent-based paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for the primary endpoint of overall response rate (33 % vs 19 %; P = 0.001). Subsequently, a number of trials have examined different schedules, doses, and combinations in efforts to optimize nab-paclitaxel-based therapy for metastatic and early-stage breast cancer. The goal of this review is to evaluate the clinical experiences to date with nab-paclitaxel as a single agent or in combination with targeted agents in different treatment settings - with a focus on the feasibility of administration, adverse event profile, and standard efficacy endpoints, such as overall survival, progression-free survival, overall response rate, and pathologic complete response rate. In general, weekly dosing during the first 3 of 4 weeks appears to achieve the best clinical benefit in both the metastatic and early-stage settings. Furthermore, the data suggest that high doses of nab-paclitaxel, such as 150 mg/m(2) during first 3 of 4 weeks or 260 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks, may be more feasible and appropriate for treatment of early-stage disease compared with metastatic disease. Intense regimens of nab-paclitaxel may not be the best treatment approach for unselected patients with metastatic breast cancer, but may suit a subset of patients for whom immediate disease control is required. The growing number of nab-paclitaxel trials in breast cancer will lead to greater refinements in tailoring therapy to patients based on their individual disease and patient characteristics.

The development of dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy

Dose-dense chemotherapy has made a significant contribution to the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. One way of achieving dose-density is through the use of sequential therapy with noncross resistant therapies to cause cell kill in tumors composed of heterogeneous cells. Another way to achieve this is to shorten the inter-treatment interval to minimize the re-growth of tumor cells, thus allowing for more effective cell killing. Several trials have tested this concept with the majority demonstrating improved efficacy with a dose-density when compared with the traditional schedule. One such notable trial was CALGB 9741 that showed that when dose size and cycle numbers were kept constant, shortening the interval between each chemotherapy dose, with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support, significantly improved disease-free and overall survival. This important and practice-changing trial led to the wide adoption of dose-dense chemotherapy and formed the basis of many subsequent studies, including allowing for the addition of biologic and targeted agents with excellent safety profile.

Prognostic role of troponin and natriuretic peptides as biomarkers for deterioration of left ventricular ejection fraction after chemotherapy

Cardiotoxicity due to anthracyclines, trastuzumab and other potential cardiotoxic drugs is still a problem of modern chemotherapy. For years researchers have tried to find biological markers that can predict changes in the heart. The most thoroughly tested markers are troponin and natriuretic peptides. Some studies have proven that these markers can indeed be useful. In studies which have shown the predictive role of troponin I the assessment of this marker was performed very frequently. It is not possible to carry out such serial measurements in many centers because of typical 1-day hospital stay times. The predictive role of natriuretic peptides still needs further investigation. This review considers the newest research from recent years.

A systematic review of bevacizumab efficacy in breast cancer

Angiogenesis is a key component of cancer growth, invasion and metastasis. Therefore, inhibition of angiogenesis is an attractive strategy for the treatment of cancer. We systematically describe phase II and III clinical trials of bevacizumab for the treatment of breast cancer.

METHODS

A computer-based literature search was carried out using PUBMED and conference databases. Original phase II and III studies reporting ≥15 patients who received bevacizumab were included.

RESULTS

41 phase II trials were identified in the metastatic setting. Most trials found bevacizumab treatment feasible. Response rates (RR) varied from 0% to 76.5%, time to progression (TTP)/progression free survival (PFS) from 2.4 to 25.3 months and overall survival from 11.5 to more than 38 months. 14 phase III trials including more than 4400 patients with MBC unanimously showed increased RR and PFS, however, no trials demonstrated an OS benefit. In the neoadjuvant setting 23 phase II and III trials were identified. All studies found increased pCR/tpCR but no benefit in terms of OS could be demonstrated. The only study conducted in the adjuvant setting failed to show any survival benefit of bevacizumab.

CONCLUSION

Despite increased response rates in both the metastatic and neoadjuvant setting, bevacizumab has failed to show any OS benefit. Future trials should include identification of robust predictive biomarkers in order to improve our understanding of molecular biomarkers and mechanisms.

nab-Paclitaxel in combination with biologically targeted agents for early and metastatic breast cancer

Taxanes are highly active chemotherapeutic agents used in the treatment of early-stage and metastatic breast cancer. Novel formulations have been developed to improve efficacy and decrease toxicity associated with these cytotoxic agents. nab-Paclitaxel is a biologically interactive, solvent-free, 130-nm-sized albumin-bound paclitaxel, developed to avoid the Cremophor vehicle used in solvent-based paclitaxel. Based on a pivotal phase 3 study, nab-paclitaxel was shown to be safely infused at a significantly higher dose of paclitaxel than the doses used with standard paclitaxel therapy, and had a shorter infusion time, no premedication, and higher response rates. It is now approved in the United States for treatment of breast cancer after failure of combination chemotherapy for metastatic disease or relapse within 6 months of adjuvant therapy, and has demonstrated promising efficacy and favorable tolerability. Recently, several phase 2 and 3 studies have suggested a role for nab-paclitaxel in combination with biologically targeted agents for the treatment of early- and late-stage breast cancer. This review will discuss the findings of clinical trials evaluating nab-paclitaxel in combination with biologically targeted therapeutic agents for breast cancer in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings.

Randomized phase II trial of weekly vs. every 2 weeks vs. every 3 weeks nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel with bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-P) and bevacizumab have each demonstrated efficacy in patients with MBC. This trial was designed to further develop nab-P by evaluating its efficacy and safety using every 3 weeks (q3w), every 2 weeks (q2w), or weekly scheduling in combination with bevacizumab as first-line treatment of MBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This open-label phase II study randomized patients to nab-P 260 mg/m(2) q3w (arm A) vs. 260 mg/m(2) q2w with filgrastim (arm B) vs. 130 mg/m(2) weekly uninterrupted, all with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg q3w arm A, 10 mg/kg q2w arms B and C). The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and toxicity. Time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Of 212 patients randomized, 208 (arm A, 75; arm B, 54; arm C, 79) were treated. Arm B was closed early due to toxicity, with more grade ≥ 2 fatigue (arm A, 46%; arm B, 62%; arm C, 62%) and bone pain (arm A, 11%; arm B, 23%; arm C, 5%). Neurotoxicity grade ≥ 2 was equivalent across the arms (> 50%) and reversible for most patients. Febrile neutropenia occurred in ≤ 3% of patients in all arms. ORR was similar among the arms (arm A, 45%; arm B, 41%; arm C, 46%). Median TTP was slightly longer in arm C (9.0 months) vs. arms A (8.0 months) and B (5.8 months) (overall, P = .105).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant antitumor activity was observed in all the arms. Weekly nab-P with bevacizumab appeared to have the highest therapeutic index. However, sensory neuropathy was treatment limiting, which suggests that a 3 weeks on and 1 week off schedule should be explored.

Addition of bevacizumab to three docetaxel regimens as adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer

Docetaxel-containing chemotherapy improves disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival in patients with early stage breast cancer. Bevacizumab improves response rate and DFS in metastatic breast cancer. However, adding antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy may increase cardiotoxicity. This trial evaluates the feasibility of adding bevacizumab to three standard adjuvant docetaxel regimens with a primary endpoint of grade ≥3 congestive heart failure (CHF). Phase IIb, randomized, non-comparative study of women with previously untreated node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patients were randomized to: (arm A) doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel or (arm B) docetaxel + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide. HER2-positive patients (arm C) received docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab for 52 weeks. All patients received bevacizumab beginning on day 1 for 52 weeks. Safety data in 212 women (mean age = 53.1 years) show that 1 patient each in arm A (1.3 %) and arm C (1.7 %), and 3 patients in arm B (4.0 %) experienced clinical CHF grade ≥3. A decreased ejection fraction was observed in 1 patient each in arms A and C, and cardiac disorder was observed in 12.8, 22.7, and 8.5 % in arms A, B, and C, respectively. A grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event was reported in 82.1, 84.0, and 52.5 % of participants in arms A, B, and C, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of DFS show rates at 24 months of 85.5, 90.4, and 90.4 % in arms A, B, and C, respectively. Adding bevacizumab to three standard docetaxel-based chemotherapy regimens as adjuvant treatment in patients with node-positive and high-risk node-negative breast cancer resulted in a low rate of clinical CHF grade ≥3. Maintenance bevacizumab monotherapy did not identify any new safety signals. Breast cancer recurrence/relapse, secondary malignancies, and death were uncommon, although the follow-up time in this study was relatively short.

Decision-making tools to assist prognosis and treatment choices in early breast cancer: a review

Breast cancer remains the most common type of cancer affecting women worldwide with an estimated lifetime risk of 1:8. With developments in adjuvant treatment and the identification of breast cancer subtypes, rising expectation of 'personalized' and 'targeted' therapy, decisions on systemic therapy have become increasingly more difficult. In a bid to assist clinicians in correctly selecting patients in whom systemic adjuvant therapy would be of most benefit, a number of decision-making tools have been developed. In this article, the authors will review some of these tools, explore how they were developed and assess the impact they have had on daily clinical practice.

Sorafenib or placebo with either gemcitabine or capecitabine in patients with HER-2-negative advanced breast cancer that progressed during or after bevacizumab

PURPOSE

We assessed adding the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib to gemcitabine or capecitabine in patients with advanced breast cancer whose disease progressed during/after bevacizumab.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase IIb study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00493636) enrolled patients with locally advanced or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer and prior bevacizumab treatment. Patients were randomized to chemotherapy with sorafenib (400 mg, twice daily) or matching placebo. Initially, chemotherapy was gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) i.v., days 1, 8/21), but later, capecitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) orally twice daily, days 1-14/21) was allowed as an alternative. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty patients were randomized. More patients received gemcitabine (82.5%) than capecitabine (17.5%). Sorafenib plus gemcitabine/capecitabine was associated with a statistically significant prolongation in PFS versus placebo plus gemcitabine/capecitabine [3.4 vs. 2.7 months; HR = 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-0.95; P = 0.02], time to progression was increased (median, 3.6 vs. 2.7 months; HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44-0.93; P = 0.02), and overall response rate was 19.8% versus 12.7% (P = 0.23). Median survival was 13.4 versus 11.4 months for sorafenib versus placebo (HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.71-1.44; P = 0.95). Addition of sorafenib versus placebo increased grade 3/4 hand-foot skin reaction (39% vs. 5%), stomatitis (10% vs. 0%), fatigue (18% vs. 9%), and dose reductions that were more frequent (51.9% vs. 7.8%).

CONCLUSION

The addition of sorafenib to gemcitabine/capecitabine provided a clinically small but statistically significant PFS benefit in HER2-negative advanced breast cancer patients whose disease progressed during/after bevacizumab. Combination treatment was associated with manageable toxicities but frequently required dose reductions.

Latest approved therapies for metastatic melanoma: what comes next?

Nowadays, oncogene-directed therapy and immunotherapy represent the two most promising avenues for patients with metastatic melanoma. The recent oncogene-directed therapeutic, vemurafenib, usually produces high level of tumor shrinkage and survival benefits in many patients with B-RAF (V600E) mutant melanomas, although the fast and high degrees of responses are likely short-lived. Conversely, the newly-approved immunotherapeutic, ipilimumab, produces durable responses in patients presenting CTLA-4 T-cell surface protein. Nevertheless, the possible synergy in combining these two therapeutic strategies primarily rely on the rational design of medical protocols (e.g., sequence and timing of agent administration; drug selectivity; compatibility of combined therapies i.e., adoptive T cell or agents, i.e., MEK inhibitor trametinib, PD-1 and PDL-1 blockers). Improved therapeutic protocols shall overcome therapeutic limitations such as the (i) tolerability and safety (i.e., minimal toxic side-effects); (ii) progression free survival (e.g., reduced relapse disease frequency); (iii) duration response (i.e., decreased drug resistance). Eventually, multidisciplinary approaches are still requested (e.g., genomics for personalized medicine, nanomedicine to overcome low free-drug bioavailability and targeting, systematic search of "melanoma stem cells" to enhance the prognosis and develop more valuable theranostics). In this paper, I will mainly present and discuss the latest and promising treatments for advanced cutaneous melanomas.

Targeted therapies in breast cancer: are heart and vessels also being targeted?

The concept of 'targeted' therapies implies that such drugs only act on cells that specifically express the particular target, therefore giving rise to a low incidence of side effects. However, targeted therapies currently approved for the treatment of breast cancer have demonstrated a relatively high incidence of cardiovascular events. The anti-HER2 agents trastuzumab and lapatinib may cause left ventricular dysfunction or even congestive heart failure. Bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic drug, has been shown to increase the risk of hypertension, cardiovascular dysfunction and thromboembolic events. In addition, several anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and antiangiogenic agents plus their combinations are currently being developed and evaluated for the treatment of breast cancer. In this review, we aim to assess the incidence of cardiac adverse events associated with targeted therapies designed to block HER2 and angiogenic pathways.

Sunitinib, hypertension, and heart failure: a model for kinase inhibitor-mediated cardiotoxicity

Kinase inhibitors have emerged as an important new class of agents for the treatment of diverse tumors. Sunitinib malate is a small-molecule, oral, multi-kinase inhibitor approved for use in treating renal cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. It has also demonstrated efficacy in treating pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and is being evaluated for the treatment of other cancers. Initially developed for its inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway, sunitinib has been associated with hypertension and heart failure. This review examines the incidence and severity of these adverse events, relevant findings from other agents that inhibit VEGF signaling, the mechanisms underlying these effects, and suggestions for their clinical management. Hypertension is a common adverse effect that is usually easily managed. The associated heart failure is less common; it can be reversible but must be actively monitored and managed. Mechanistic insights suggest that an attentive clinical strategy for hypertension could prevent severe cardiotoxicity.

Benefit-risk assessment of bevacizumab in the treatment of breast cancer

An evaluation of the benefit-versus-risk of bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced breast cancer is timely and relevant. Recently, the US FDA has withdrawn the approval of bevacizumab as a therapeutic option for the treatment of advanced breast cancer, generating controversy in the scientific community. Although the pivotal study (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 2100 trial [E2100]) had shown doubling of the progression-free survival when bevacizumab was added to chemotherapy, this magnitude of benefit could not be replicated in subsequent studies. Furthermore, individual studies and meta-analyses failed to demonstrate an overall survival benefit with the addition of bevacizumab to different chemotherapy regimens. In addition, this agent is associated with an increased incidence of serious adverse events such as hypertension, congestive heart failure and thromboembolism, and its cost is likely to be a consideration in its use for many patients worldwide. Retrospective biomarker-based studies aiming to identify the subpopulation of patients most likely to benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy in breast cancer should be a research priority.

A phase II pilot trial incorporating bevacizumab into dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in patients with lymph node positive breast cancer: a trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

E2104 was designed to evaluate the safety of two different strategies incorporating bevacizumab into anthracycline-containing adjuvant therapy as a precursor to a definitive randomized phase III trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were sequentially assigned to one of two treatment arms. In addition to dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (Taxol) (ddAC→T), all patients received bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks × 26) initiated either concurrently with AC (Arm A: ddBAC→BT→B) or with paclitaxel (Arm B: ddAC→BT→B). The primary end point was incidence of clinically apparent cardiac dysfunction (CHF).

RESULTS

Patients enrolled were 226 in number (Arm A 104, Arm B 122). Grade 3 hypertension, thrombosis, proteinuria and hemorrhage were reported for 12, 2, 2 and <1% of patients, respectively. Two patients developed grade 3 or more cerebrovascular ischemia. Three patients in each arm developed CHF. There was no significant difference between arms in the proportion of patients with an absolute decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction of >15% or >10% to below the lower limit of normal post AC or post bevacizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of bevacizumab into anthracycline-containing adjuvant therapy does not result in prohibitive cardiac toxicity. The definitive phase III trial (E5103) was activated with systematic and extensive cardiac monitoring to define the true impact of bevacizumab on cardiac function.

Nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of breast cancer: efficacy, safety, and approval

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is a novel formulation of paclitaxel that does not require solvents such as polyoxyethylated castor oil and ethanol. Use of these solvents has been associated with toxic response, including hypersensitivity reactions and prolonged sensory neuropathy, as well as a negative impact in relation to the therapeutic index of paclitaxel. nab-paclitaxel displays greater antitumor activity and less toxicity than solvent-base paclitaxel. In a phase I trial of single nab-paclitaxel, the maximum tolerated dose was 300 mg/m(2) with the dose limiting toxicities being sensory neuropathy, stomatitis, and superficial keratopathy. In the metastatic setting, a pivotal comparative randomized phase III study demonstrated that nab-paclitaxel (at 260 mg/m(2) over 30 minutes infusion without premedication every 3 weeks) mediated a superior objective response rate and prolonged time to progression compared with solvent-based paclitaxel (at 175 mg/m(2) over a 3-hour injection with standard premedication). The nab-paclitaxel-treated group showed a higher incidence of sensory neuropathy than the solvent-based paclitaxel group. However, these adverse side effects rapidly resolved after interruption of treatment and dose reduction. Weekly administration of nabpaclitaxel was also more active and displayed less toxicity compared with 100 mg/m(2) docetaxel given triweekly. Nab-paclitaxel has already been approved in 42 countries for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline, based on confirmation of the efficacy and manageable toxicity in the metastatic setting. This review summarizes the most relevant knowledge on nab-paclitaxel for treating breast cancer in terms of clinical usefulness including efficacy and safety of this new agent.