Cetuximab Pharmacokinetics Influences Progression-Free Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

Antibody Drug Clearance: An Underexplored Marker of Outcomes with Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has dramatically changed the clinical landscape for several cancers, and ICI use continues to expand across many cancer types. Low baseline clearance (CL) and/or a large reduction of CL during treatment correlates with better clinical response and longer survival. Similar phenomena have also been reported with other monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in cancer and other diseases, highlighting a characteristic of mAb clinical pharmacology that is potentially shared among various mAbs and diseases. Though tempting to attribute poor outcomes to low drug exposure and arguably low target engagement due to high CL, such speculation is not supported by the relatively flat exposure-response relationship of most ICIs, where a higher dose or exposure is not likely to provide additional benefit. Instead, an elevated and/or increasing CL could be a surrogate marker of the inherent resistant phenotype that cannot be reversed by maximizing drug exposure. The mechanisms connecting ICI clearance, therapeutic efficacy, and resistance are unclear and likely to be multifactorial. Therefore, to explore the potential of ICI CL as an early marker for efficacy, this review highlights the similarities and differences of CL characteristics and CL-response relationships for all FDA-approved ICIs, and we compare and contrast these to selected non-ICI mAbs. We also discuss underlying mechanisms that potentially link mAb CL with efficacy and highlight existing knowledge gaps and future directions where more clinical and preclinical investigations are warranted to clearly understand the value of baseline and/or time-varying CL in predicting response to ICI-based therapeutics.

Plasma Cetuximab Concentrations Correlate With Survival in Patients With Advanced KRAS Wild Type Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Cetuximab is a standard of care therapy for patients with RAS wild-type (WT) advanced colorectal cancer. Limited data suggest a wide variation in cetuximab plasma concentrations after standard dosing regimens. We correlated cetuximab plasma concentrations with survival and toxicity.

METHODS

The CO. 20 study randomized patients with RAS WT advanced colorectal cancer in a 1:1 ratio to cetuximab 400 mg/m2 intravenously followed by weekly maintenance of 250 mg/m2, plus brivanib 800 mg orally daily or placebo. Blood samples obtained at week 5 precetuximab treatment were analyzed by ELISA. Patients were grouped into tertiles based on plasma cetuximab concentrations. Cetuximab concentration tertiles were correlated with survival outcomes and toxicity. Patient demographic and biochemical parameters were evaluated as co-variables.

RESULTS

Week 5 plasma cetuximab concentrations were available for 591 patients (78.8%). The median overall survival (OS) was 11.4 months and 7.8 months for patients in the highest (T3) and lowest tertiles (T1) respectively. On multivariable analysis, plasma cetuximab concentration was associated with OS (HR 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.83, P < .001, T3 vs. T1), and a trend towards progression-free survival (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.02, P = .07, T3 vs. T1). There was no association between cetuximab concentration and skin toxicity or diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

The standard cetuximab dosing regimen may not be optimal for all patients. Further pharmacokinetic studies are needed to optimize cetuximab dosing given the potential improvement in OS.

Relationship Between Cetuximab Target-Mediated Pharmacokinetics and Progression-Free Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cetuximab, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 antibody, has been approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The influence of target-antigen on cetuximab pharmacokinetics has never been investigated using target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) modelling. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between cetuximab concentrations, target kinetics and progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

In this ancillary study (NCT00559741), 91 patients with mCRC treated with cetuximab were assessed. Influence of target levels on cetuximab pharmacokinetics was described using TMDD modelling. The relationship between cetuximab concentrations, target kinetics and time-to-progression (TTP) was described using a joint pharmacokinetic-TTP model, where unbound target levels were assumed to influence hazard of progression by an Emax model. Mitigation strategies of concentration-response relationship, i.e., time-varying endogenous clearance and mutual influences of clearance and time-to-progression were investigated.

RESULTS

Cetuximab concentration-time data were satisfactorily described using the TMDD model with quasi-steady-state approximation and time-varying endogenous clearance. Estimated target parameters were baseline target levels (R0 = 43 nM), and complex elimination rate constant (kint = 0.95 day-1). Estimated time-varying clearance parameters were time-invariant component of CL (CL0= 0.38 L/day-1), time-variant component of CL (CL1= 0.058 L/day-1) and first-order rate of CL1 decreasing over time (kdes = 0.049 day-1). Part of concentration-TTP was TTP-driven, where clearance and TTP were inversely correlated. In addition, increased target occupancy was associated with increased TTP.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study describing the complex relationship between cetuximab target-mediated pharmacokinetics and PFS in mCRC patients using a joint PK-time-to-progression model. Further studies are needed to provide a more in-depth description of this relationship.

A Novel Class of On-Treatment Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarker: Trough Levels of Antibody Therapeutics in Peripheral Blood

While immune checkpoint blockade has revolutionized cancer treatment, unfortunately most patients do not benefit from this treatment. Many pharmacodynamic (PD) studies have revealed essential requirements for successful cancer immunotherapy that may provide insight into how we can improve these agents. Despite enormous efforts focused on interrogating the immune system using different biospecimens (e.g. blood, primary tumor, metastatic tumor, microbiome samples), a variety of technologies (e.g. flow cytometry, bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing, immunohistochemistry), and wide-ranging disciplines (e.g. pathology, genomics, bioinformatics, immunology, cancer biology, metabolomics, bacteriology), discovery of consistent biomarkers of response have remained elusive. Pharmacokinetics (PK) studies, however, not only provide critical information regarding safe dosing but may also reveal useful biomarkers. For example, recent studies found that trough levels of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or clearance (CL) of them were associated with clinical outcome, which suggests that trough levels of mAbs may represent a new class of on-treatment cancer immunotherapy biomarker. In this review, we summarize the potential utility of trough levels of mAbs, the mechanism of varying PK, consideration for therapeutic drug monitoring, and assay attributes that will facilitate wider utilization of PK information in conjunction with PD assessments.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of approved monoclonal antibody therapy for colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of monoclonal antibodies to the chemotherapy backbone treatment has challenged the paradigm of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment. Their mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics are complex but important to understand in order to improve patient selection and treatment outcomes for mCRC population.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the scientific data, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of approved monoclonal antibodies used to treat mCRC patients, including agents targeting signaling via VEGFR (bevacizumab and ramucirumab), EGFR (cetuximab and panitumumab), HER2/3 target therapy, and immunotherapy agents such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab. Efficacy and mechanism of action of bispecific antibodies are also covered.

EXPERT OPINION

mCRC is a heterogeneous disease and the optimal selection and sequence of treatments is challenging. Monoclonal antibodies have complex pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, with important interactions between them. The arrival of bioequivalent molecules to the market increases the need for the characterization of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of classic monoclonal antibodies to reach bioequivalent novel molecules.

Early change in the clearance of pembrolizumab reflects the survival and therapeutic response: A population pharmacokinetic analysis in real-world non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

The dosing pattern of pembrolizumab is based on population pharmacokinetic (Pop-PK) analysis of clinical trials. Data for Japanese patients or patient populations with poor conditions such as cachexia are scarce. In this study, we performed a Pop-PK analysis of Japanese non-small cell lung cancer patients and analyzed the relationship between exposure, treatment effect, and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 270 blood samples from 76 patients who received 200 mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks between March 2017 and December 2018 were included. Blood concentrations of pembrolizumab were measured using mass spectrometry, and Pop-PK analysis was conducted using the Phoenix NLME software with a one-compartment model.

RESULTS

The estimated median of clearance (CL) in this analysis population was 0.104 L/day, about half of the historical data for Western data. Overall, pembrolizumab CL decreased over time, with some populations showing increased CL early in the treatment and others showing decreased CL over time. When the time-varying CL was stratified by quartile, the group with decreasing CL showed significantly better treatment response and survival than the group with increasing CL, even though the group included more patients with cachexia. Detailed analysis suggested that the patient population that responded to pembrolizumab treatment had an improved general condition and reduced protein catabolism, further decreasing CL.

CONCLUSION

In populations that benefit from pembrolizumab treatment, CL may be reduced early in their treatment, which may be a predictive and prognostic factor. However, further prospective validation of our findings is needed.

Mechanistic Modeling of the Effect of Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) on Subcutaneous Delivery of Cetuximab in Rats

PURPOSE

To evaluate the duration of effect of rHuPH20 on SC absorption of cetuximab and to develop a mechanistic pharmacokinetic model linking the kinetics of rHuPH20 action with hyaluronan (HA) homeostasis and absorption of cetuximab from the SC space.

METHODS

Serum pharmacokinetics of cetuximab was evaluated after IV and SC dosing at 0.4 and 10 mg/kg (control groups). In test groups, SC cetuximab was administered simultaneously with rHuPH20 (Co-Injection) or 12 h after injection of rHuPH20 (Pre-Injection). Mechanistic pharmacokinetic model was developed to simultaneously capture cetuximab kinetics in all groups.

RESULTS

Administration of rHuPH20 resulted in a faster absorption of cetuximab; the difference between co-injection and pre-injection groups appeared to be dependent on the dose level. The model combined three major components: kinetics of rHuPH20 at SC site; HA homeostasis and its disruption by rHuPH20; and cetuximab systemic disposition and the effect of HA disruption on cetuximab SC absorption. The model provided good description of experimental data obtained in this study and collected previously.

CONCLUSIONS

Proposed model can serve as a potential translational framework for capturing the effect of rHuPH20 across multiple preclinical species and in human studies and can be used for optimization of SC delivery of biotherapeutics.

AAV-Vectored Expression of the Vascular Normalizing Agents 3TSR and Fc3TSR, and the Anti-Angiogenic Bevacizumab Extends Survival in a Murine Model of End-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecological malignancy. The lack of effective treatments highlights the need for novel therapeutic interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate whether sustained adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector-mediated expression of vascular normalizing agents 3TSR and Fc3TSR and the antiangiogenic monoclonal antibody, Bevacizumab, with or without oncolytic virus treatment would improve survival in an orthotopic syngeneic mouse model of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. AAV vectors were administered 40 days post-tumor implantation and combined with oncolytic avian orthoavulavirus-1 (AOaV-1) 20 days later, at the peak of AAV-transgene expression, to ascertain whether survival could be extended. Flow cytometry conducted on blood samples, taken at an acute time point post-AOaV-1 administration (36 h), revealed a significant increase in activated NK cells in the blood of all mice that received AOaV-1. T cell analysis revealed a significant increase in CD8+ tumor specific T cells in the blood of AAV-Bevacizumab+AOaV-1 treated mice compared to control mice 10 days post AOaV-1 administration. Immunohistochemical staining of primary tumors harvested from a subset of mice euthanized 90 days post tumor implantation, when mice typically have large primary tumors, secondary peritoneal lesions, and extensive ascites fluid production, revealed that AAV-3TSR, AAV-Fc3TSR+AOaV-1, or AAV-Bevacizumab+AOaV-1 treated mice had significantly more tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells than PBS controls. Despite AAV-mediated transgene expression waning faster in tumor-bearing mice than in non-tumor bearing mice, all three of the AAV therapies significantly extended survival compared to control mice; with AAV-Bevacizumab performing the best in this model. However, combining AAV therapies with a single dose of AOaV-1 did not lead to significant extensions in survival compared to AAV therapies on their own, suggesting that additional doses of AOaV-1 may be required to improve efficacy in this model. These results suggest that vectorizing anti-angiogenic and vascular normalizing agents is a viable therapeutic option that warrants further investigation, including optimizing combination therapies.

Late phase 1 studies: concepts and outcomes

Over the past two decades, targeted therapies have become cornerstone treatments for numerous cancers with oncogene addiction. Unfortunately, their effectiveness reduces over time and most patients who receive targeted therapies relapse within 12 months. The emergence of drug-resistance mechanisms in tumours paved the way for next-generation inhibitors. However, insufficient concentration of targeted therapy is a frequent but poorly explored mechanism of treatment failure. Additionally, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is not always reached in phase studies, and the recommended phase 2 dose is mostly based on benefit-risk ratio and pharmacokinetic considerations, which could result in a suboptimal dose. This scenario has led us to propose a new concept in clinical drug development: the late phase 1 study. The primary goal of this type of trial is to define an alternative MTD of a drug in patients who are chronically exposed and had an initial benefit from targeted therapy but subsequently progressed without an identified resistance alteration. Intrapatient dose escalation might increase drug concentration and restore drug activity or efficacy.

Cross-Validation of a Multiplex LC-MS/MS Method for Assaying mAbs Plasma Levels in Patients with Cancer: A GPCO-UNICANCER Study

BACKGROUND

Different liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods have been published for quantification of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in plasma but thus far none allowed the simultaneous quantification of several mAbs, including immune checkpoint inhibitors. We developed and validated an original multiplex LC-MS/MS method using a ready-to-use kit to simultaneously assay 7 mAbs (i.e., bevacizumab, cetuximab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, rituximab and trastuzumab) in plasma. This method was next cross-validated with respective reference methods (ELISA or LC-MS/MS).

METHODS

The mAbXmise kit was used for mAb extraction and full-length stable-isotope-labeled antibodies as internal standards. The LC-MS/MS method was fully validated following current EMA guidelines. Each cross validation between reference methods and ours included 16-28 plasma samples from cancer patients.

RESULTS

The method was linear from 2 to 100 µg/mL for all mAbs. Inter- and intra-assay precision was <14.6% and accuracy was 90.1-111.1%. The mean absolute bias of measured concentrations between multiplex and reference methods was 10.6% (range 3.0-19.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and cross-validated a simple, accurate and precise method that allows the assay of up to 7 mAbs. Furthermore, the present method is the first to offer a simultaneous quantification of three immune checkpoint inhibitors likely to be associated in patients.

A plug-and-play platform of ratiometric bioluminescent sensors for homogeneous immunoassays

Heterogeneous immunoassays such as ELISA have become indispensable in modern bioanalysis, yet translation into point-of-care assays is hindered by their dependence on external calibration and multiple washing and incubation steps. Here, we introduce RAPPID (Ratiometric Plug-and-Play Immunodiagnostics), a mix-and-measure homogeneous immunoassay platform that combines highly specific antibody-based detection with a ratiometric bioluminescent readout. The concept entails analyte-induced complementation of split NanoLuc luciferase fragments, photoconjugated to an antibody sandwich pair via protein G adapters. Introduction of a calibrator luciferase provides a robust ratiometric signal that allows direct in-sample calibration and quantitative measurements in complex media such as blood plasma. We developed RAPPID sensors that allow low-picomolar detection of several protein biomarkers, anti-drug antibodies, therapeutic antibodies, and both SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. With its easy-to-implement standardized workflow, RAPPID provides an attractive, fast, and low-cost alternative to traditional immunoassays, in an academic setting, in clinical laboratories, and for point-of-care applications.

Many current immunoassays require multiple washing, incubation and optimization steps. Here the authors present Ratiometric Plug-and-Play Immunodiagnostics (RAPPID), a generic assay platform that uses ratiometric bioluminescent detection to allow sandwich immunoassays to be performed directly in solution.

Importance and Considerations of Antibody Engineering in Antibody-Drug Conjugates Development from a Clinical Pharmacologist's Perspective

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) appear to be in a developmental boom, with five FDA approvals in the last two years and a projected market value of over $4 billion by 2024. Major advancements in the engineering of these novel cytotoxic drug carriers have provided a few early success stories. Although the use of these immunoconjugate agents are still in their infancy, valuable lessons in the engineering of these agents have been learned from both preclinical and clinical failures. It is essential to appreciate how the various mechanisms used to engineer changes in ADCs can alter the complex pharmacology of these agents and allow the ADCs to navigate the modern-day therapeutic challenges within oncology. This review provides a global overview of ADC characteristics which can be engineered to alter the interaction with the immune system, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and therapeutic index of ADCs. In addition, this review will highlight some of the engineering approaches being explored in the creation of the next generation of ADCs.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship of trastuzumab and bevacizumab in early-stage breast cancer

AIMS

To describe the sources of interindividual variability of bevacizumab and trastuzumab pharmacokinetics in early-stage breast cancer, and to study the relationship between exposure and both early clinical response and specific adverse events.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (n = 86) received 6 cycles of docetaxel + trastuzumab. Early tumour response was assessed by determination of the maximum standard uptake value (SUV_max) variation (ΔSUV_max) after 1 cycle using [¹⁸F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET. Early poor responders (ΔSUV_max < 70%) also received bevacizumab from cycle 3 to cycle 6. Sources of interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics of both antibodies were studied by population compartment modelling. Exposure as assessed by area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) was compared between responders and non-responders and between patients experiencing specific adverse events or not.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model described the pharmacokinetics of both antibodies satisfactorily. Their central volume of distributions (Vc) increased with body surface area and their elimination half-lives were shorter (~14 days) than previously reported (~26-28 days). There was a time-dependent increase in trastuzumab Vc, positively correlated to baseline SUV_max. Bevacizumab elimination rate (k₁₀) was positively correlated with ΔSUV_max measured at the end of the first cycle. Bevacizumab had no significantly influence on trastuzumab pharmacokinetics. No relationship between exposure and clinical response or occurrence of adverse events was found.

CONCLUSION

Tumour uptake as assessed by SUV_max influences the pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab and trastuzumab. In early-stage breast cancer, elimination half-lives of these therapeutic monoclonal antibodies may be shorter than those previously reported in more advanced disease.

Population pharmacokinetics of raxibacumab in healthy adult subjects

AIMS

Raxibacumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of Bacillus anthracis toxins, thereby protecting target cells from its effects. Raxibacumab is approved in the USA for the treatment of adults and children with inhalational anthrax in combination with antibiotics, and for prophylaxis of inhalational anthrax. The aim of this investigation was to characterise the population pharmacokinetics and assess the effect of baseline demographic covariates on the disposition of raxibacumab.

METHODS

The data used for this analysis were obtained from 3 clinical trials and include 2229 blood samples from 322 healthy subjects who were randomised to receive a 40 mg/kg intravenous dose of raxibacumab over a period of 2.25 hours. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed using a nonlinear mixed effects approach. Secondary parameters of interest were the area under the curve, maximum concentration and the time of serum raxibacumab concentrations greater than or equimolar to the highest serum protective antigen concentrations observed for at least 28 days in any monkey challenged with B. anthracis that died.

RESULTS

Raxibacumab exposure in healthy subjects was described by a 2-compartment model. Interindividual variability was estimated for all model parameters, whilst residual variability was described by a proportional and additive error model. Weight was the only influential covariate with significant effect on disposition parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

A dose of 40 mg/kg provided comparable exposure across the overall healthy subject population. Interindividual variability in raxibacumab vs. time profiles could partially be accounted for by differences in body weight.

Monoclonal Antibody Monitoring: Clinically Relevant Aspects, A Systematic Critical Review

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy does not usually lead to a clinical response in all patients and resistance may increase over time after repeated mAb administration. This lack or loss of response to the treatment may originate from different and little-known epigenetic, biomolecular, or pathophysiological mechanisms, although an inadequate serum concentration is perhaps the most likely cause, even if not widely recognized and investigated yet. Patient factors that influence the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a mAb should be taken into account. Multiple analyses of patient-derived PK data have identified various factors influencing the clearance of mAbs. These factors include the presence of antidrug antibodies, low serum albumin, high serum levels of C-reactive protein, high body weight, and gender differences among others. The same clearance processes involved in systemic clearance after intravenous administration are also involved in local first-pass catabolism after subcutaneous administration of mAbs. Therapeutic drug monitoring has been proposed as a way to understand and respond to the variability in clinical response and remission. For both classes of mAbs with anti-inflammatory and antitumor effects, dose-guided optimization based on the measurement of serum concentrations in individual patients could be the next step for a personalized and targeted mAb therapy.

Predictive and prognostic biomarkers with therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer: A 2021 update on current development, evidence, and recommendation

Although therapeutically actionable molecular alterations are widely distributed across many cancer types, only a handful of them show evidence of clinical utility and are recommended for routine clinical practice in the management of cancers of colon and rectum (CRC). This 2021 update aims to provide a succinct summary on the use of prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers (expanded RAS, BRAF, microsatellite-high [MSI-H] or deficient mismatch repair [dMMR], neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase [NTRK] fusion genes, and human epidermal growth factor receptor type II [HER2] gene amplification) associated with CRC. Therapeutic implications of each relevant predictive or prognostic biomarker for patients with CRC are described, along with discussion on new developments on (1) biomarker-driven therapies such as testing of BRAF, MLH1 promoter methylation and MMR germline genes in differentiating sporadic CRC or hereditary conditions such as Lynch syndrome; (2) first-line use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic CRC; (3) risk stratification and therapy selection based on primary tumor location (left-sided vs. right-sided colon cancer); (3) atypical BRAF mutations; (4) use of EGFR directed therapy in the perioperative oligometastatic disease setting; (5) re-challenge of EGFR directed therapy and (6) personalizing therapy of fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan based on new evidence in pharmacogenomic testing. Data are collected and analyzed from available systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatments with known therapeutic targets in CRC, which may be associated with predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers. Discussions are presented in an application-based format, with goal to empower pharmacists or other clinicians to gain awareness and understanding in biomarker-driven cancer therapy issues.

Unraveling the complexity of therapeutic drug monitoring for monoclonal antibody therapies to individualize dose in oncology

Monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) have become key drugs in cancer treatment, either as targeted therapies or more recently as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The fact that only some patients benefit from these drugs poses the usual question in the field of onco-hematology: that of the benefit of individual dosing and the potential of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to carry out this individualization. However, Mabs present unique pharmacological characteristics for TDM, and the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship observed should be interpreted differently than that observed for conventional drugs and small molecules. This pharmacology practice review has been summarized from a public debate between the authors at the International TDM and Clinical Toxicology meeting in Banff, 2020, regarding the potential roles of TDM in the Mab/ICI setting.

Correlations between serum cetuximab and EGFR-related markers, and skin disorders in head and neck cancer patients

PURPOSE

Cetuximab inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer and skin cells, thereby inducing anti-cancer effects and skin disorders. The present study aimed to evaluate the relationships between serum cetuximab and EGFR-related markers, and adverse effects in head and neck cancer patients.

METHODS

Thirty-four head and neck cancer patients receiving weekly intravenous cetuximab were enrolled. Serum cetuximab levels were determined just before dosing. Blood samples for determination of serum EGFR-related markers including soluble epidermal growth factor receptor (sEGFR) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were obtained. The severities of skin disorders, their medications, and hypomagnesemia treatment were also assessed.

RESULTS

Serum levels of cetuximab and sEGFR were negatively and positively correlated with that of IL-6, respectively. The serum cetuximab level was twofold higher in the patients with a grade 2-3 skin rash than with a grade 0-1 rash. The serum cetuximab cutoff value related to severe skin rash was 71 μg/mL (sensitivity, 59%; and specificity, 94%). The use of a strong topical corticosteroid for skin rash was also associated with a higher serum cetuximab level. Serum levels of sEGFR and IL-6 had no correlations with the skin disorder severities or their medications. Hypomagnesemia treatment using intravenous magnesium sulfate was not related to serum cetuximab and EGFR-related markers.

CONCLUSIONS

Head and neck cancer patients with a higher serum IL-6 level tended to have a lower serum cetuximab level. Serum cetuximab had positive correlations to skin rash severity and its medication in the study population.

Comparison of Various Phase I Combination Therapy Designs in Oncology for Evaluation of Early Tumor Shrinkage Using Simulations

There is still a lack of efficient designs for identifying the dose response in oncology combination therapies in early clinical trials. The concentration response relationship can be identified using the early tumor shrinkage time course, which has been shown to be a good early response marker of clinical efficacy. The performance of various designs using an exposure–tumor growth inhibition model was explored using simulations. Different combination effects of new drug M and cetuximab (reference therapy) were explored first assuming no effect of M on cetuximab (to investigate the type I error (α)), and subsequently assuming additivity or synergy between cetuximab and M. One‐arm, two‐arm, and four‐arm designs were evaluated. In the one‐arm design, 60 patients received cetuximab + M. In the two‐arm design, 30 patients received cetuximab and 30 received cetuximab + M. In the four‐arm design, in addition to cetuximab and cetuximab + M as standard doses, combination arms with lower doses of cetuximab were evaluated (15 patients/arm). Model‐based predictions or “simulated observations” of early tumor shrinkage at week 8 (ETS8) were compared between the different arms. With the same number of individuals, the one‐arm design showed better statistical power than other designs but led to strong inflation of α in case of misestimated reference for ETS8 value. The two‐arm design protected against this misestimation and, with the same total number of subjects, would provide higher statistical power than a four‐arm design. However, a four‐arm design would be helpful for exploring more doses of cetuximab in combination with M to better understand the interaction.

Semimechanistic Clearance Models of Oncology Biotherapeutics and Impact of Study Design: Cetuximab as a Case Study

This study aimed to explore the currently competing and new semimechanistic clearance models for monoclonal antibodies and the impact of clearance model misspecification on exposure metrics under different study designs exemplified for cetuximab. Six clearance models were investigated under four different study designs (sampling density and single/multiple‐dose levels) using a rich data set from two cetuximab clinical trials (226 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer) and using the nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling approach. A two‐compartment model with parallel Michaelis–Menten and time‐decreasing linear clearance adequately described the data, the latter being related to post‐treatment response. With respect to bias in exposure metrics, the simplified time‐varying linear clearance (CL) model was the best alternative. Time‐variance of the linear CL component should be considered for biotherapeutics if response impacts pharmacokinetics. Rich sampling at steady‐state was crucial for unbiased estimation of Michaelis–Menten elimination in case of the reference (parallel Michaelis–Menten and time‐varying linear CL) model.

A multilayered epithelial mucosa model of head neck squamous cell carcinoma for analysis of tumor-microenvironment interactions and drug development

Pharmacotherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) often fails due to the development of chemoresistance and severe systemic side effects of current regimens limiting dose escalation. Preclinical models comprising all major elements of treatment resistance are urgently needed for the development of new strategies to overcome these limitations. For model establishment, we used tumor cells from patient-derived HNSCC xenografts or cell lines (SCC-25, UM-SCC-22B) and characterized the model phenotype. Docetaxel and cetuximab were selected for comparative analysis of drug-related effects at topical and systemic administration. Cetuximab cell binding was mapped by cluster-based fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy.The tumor oral mucosa (TOM) models displayed unstructured, hyper-proliferative, and pleomorphic cell layers, reflecting well the original tumor morphology and grading. Dose- and time-dependent effects of docetaxel on tumor size, apoptosis, hypoxia, and interleukin-6 release were observed. Although the spectrum of effects was comparable, significantly lower doses were required to achieve similar docetaxel-induced changes at topical compared to systemic application. Despite displaying anti-proliferative effects in monolayer cultures, cetuximab treatment showed only minor effects in TOM models. This was not due to inefficient cetuximab uptake or target cell binding but likely mediated by microenvironmental components.We developed multi-layered HNSCC models, closely reflecting tumor morphology and displaying complex interactions between the tumor and its microenvironment. Topical application of docetaxel emerged as promising option for HNSCC treatment. Aside from the development of novel strategies for topical drug delivery, our tumor model might help to better understand key regulators of drug-tumor-interactions.

Towards Rational Cancer Therapeutics: Optimizing Dosing, Delivery, Scheduling, and Combinations

The current trend to personalize anticancer therapies mostly relies on selecting the best drug or combination of drugs to achieve optimal efficacy in patients. In addition to the comprehensive genetic and molecular knowledge of each tumor before choosing the drugs to be given, there is probably much room left for improvement by further personalizing the very modes by which the drugs are given, once they have been carefully selected. In particular, shifting from standard dosing to tailored dosing should help in maintaining drug exposure levels in the right therapeutic window, thus ensuring that the efficacy/toxicity balance is optimal. This paper covers the current knowledge regarding pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of anticancer agents, from decades-old cytotoxics to the latest immune checkpoint inhibitors, the most frequent sources for long-neglected interpatient variability impacting on drug exposure levels, and what could be done to achieve real personalized medicine in oncology such as implementing therapeutic drug monitoring with adaptive dosing strategies or using model-driven modalities for personalized dosing and scheduling.

Correlation Between Bevacizumab Exposure and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab treatment is subject to large interpatient variability in efficacy, which may partly be explained by differences in complex bevacizumab pharmacokinetic characteristics that influence bevacizumab exposure. Exposure-response relationships have been identified for other monoclonal antibodies. We aimed to identify possible exposure-survival relationships in bevacizumab-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with mCRC who started first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy between July 2012 and July 2014, and from whom serial blood samples and survival were prospectively collected, were included. Follow-up was carried out until July 2018. Total bevacizumab trough concentrations were measured from cycle 2 to cycle 30 of treatment. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Cox analysis were used to identify the relationship between concentrations and overall survival (OS). In addition, OS was compared between different trough concentration groups.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-seven blood samples from 46 patients were evaluable for analyses. ROC analysis showed a clear separation in survival based on trough levels (area under the curve = 0.739, p = .009). Cox regression also showed a strong positive correlation between trough levels and survival (p = .0004). Three distinct groups of exposure were identified: low (median trough concentration [C_tm ] ≤41.9 mg/L); medium (C_tm 43-87.2 mg/L) with median OS of 12.8 and 36 months, respectively (p = .0003); and high (C_tm ≥7.9 mg/L), where the majority of patients were still alive 60 months after the initiation of treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that survival was proportional to the magnitude of exposure in patients with mCRC. Further clinical research should focus on clarifying these exposure-outcome relationships in order to optimize dosing.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Bevacizumab-based chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. Moreover, bevacizumab presents complicated pharmacokinetics, and in many cases, clinical outcomes can be highly variable, with some patients responding remarkably well and others not. This study's results show that patients who experienced longer overall survival also had significantly higher exposure to bevacizumab. Therefore, bevacizumab trough concentrations could be used both as a predictive biomarker and as a tool for treatment monitoring and optimization. Finally, the development of validated, rapid, and sensitive assays for bevacizumab concentration measurements in combination with these results may lead to a therapeutic drug monitoring-guided approach in bevacizumab treatment with better clinical outcomes.

Influence of Antigen Mass on the Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Antibodies in Humans

Therapeutic antibodies are increasingly used to treat various diseases, including neoplasms and chronic inflammatory diseases. Antibodies exhibit complex pharmacokinetic properties, notably owing to the influence of antigen mass, i.e. the amount of antigenic targets to which the monoclonal antibody binds specifically. This review focuses on the influence of antigen mass on the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic antibodies quantified by pharmacokinetic modelling in humans. Out of 159 pharmacokinetic studies, 85 reported an influence of antigen mass. This influence led to non-linear elimination decay in 50 publications, which was described using target-mediated drug disposition or derived models, as quasi-steady-state, irreversible binding and Michaelis-Menten models. In 35 publications, the pharmacokinetics was apparently linear and the influence of antigen mass was described as a covariate of pharmacokinetic parameters. If some reported covariates, such as the circulating antigen level or tumour size, are likely to be correlated to antigen mass, others, such as disease activity or disease type, may contain little information on the amount of antigenic targets. In some cases, antigen targets exist in different forms, notably in the circulation and expressed at the cell surface. The influence of antigen mass should be soundly described during the early clinical phases of drug development. To maximise therapeutic efficacy, sufficient antibody doses should be administered to ensure the saturation of antigen targets by therapeutic antibodies in all patients. If necessary, antigen mass should be taken into account in routine clinical practice.

[Determining the dose to be injected in the first clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies: not so easy!]

Monoclonal antibodies are a therapeutic tool frequently used in oncology, as they allow the specific targeting of molecules expressed by cancer cells and, in most cases, induce minimal toxic effects on healthy tissues. Because monoclonal antibodies frequently lack significant toxicity and are not associated to a direct relationship between dose and effect, the methods of clinical development traditionally used for chemotherapy agents are scarcely useful for this class of drugs. In addition, no consensus exists on the definition of parameters different from toxicity that could assist the process of dose selection of monoclonal antibody in early clinical trials.

[Pharmacokinetic variability of therapeutic antibodies]

Therapeutic antibodies have been increasingly used for the treatment of various diseases, including cancers and chronic inflammatory diseases. The pharmacokinetic interindividual variability of mAbs is large and influences, at least in part, the clinical response to antibody treatment. This variability is explained by a number of individual sources of variability, which are reviewed here. Some of them are major because they are frequently reported to greatly influence the interindividual variability; notably, increased body size, the presence of anti-drug antibodies, and high antigen mass are associated with decreased antibody concentrations. Other individual sources of variability are of less critical importance. They include sex, age, co-treatments, or genetic polymorphisms of IgG Fc receptors (FcgRs). The interindividual variability of antibody pharmacokinetics should be soundly described in order to design optimal dosing strategy.

Setting the Dose of Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Role of Clinical Pharmacology

Cancer immunotherapy is based on checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) that significantly improve the clinical outcome of several malignant diseases. These inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed at cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), sharing most of the clinical pharmacokinetic characteristics of mAb targeted therapies, all of which differ from those of cytotoxics and small molecules. Establishing the labeled dose of mAbs, and particularly of the CPIs, represents a true challenge. This review therefore examines the main criteria used for dose selection, along with their limits. The relationships between CPI pharmacokinetic parameters and treatment outcome (efficacy and/or toxicity) differ somewhat among the various drugs, but general features can be identified. Nevertheless, the interpretation of these relationships remains quite controversial. A first interpretation asserts that inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability in clearance has an impact on outcome and should be taken into consideration for dosing individualization. The second considers that higher clearance values observed in some patients result from characteristics associated with poor predictive factors of efficacy. Finally, the schedule, and particularly its frequency of administration, merits rethinking.

[89Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT as biomarker for cetuximab monotherapy in patients with RAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

One-third of patients with RAS wild-type mCRC do not benefit from anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. This might be a result of variable pharmacokinetics and insufficient tumor targeting. We evaluated cetuximab tumor accumulation on [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT as a potential predictive biomarker and determinant for an escalating dosing strategy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PET/CT imaging of [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-cetuximab (37 MBq/10 mg) after a therapeutic pre-dose (500 mg/m² ≤ 2 h) cetuximab was performed at the start of treatment. Patients without visual tumor uptake underwent dose escalation and a subsequent [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT. Treatment benefit was defined as stable disease or response on CT scan evaluation after 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Visual tumor uptake on [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT was observed in 66% of 35 patients. There was no relationship between PET positivity and treatment benefit (52% versus 80% for PET-negative, P = 0.16), progression-free survival (3.6 versus 5.7 months, P = 0.15), or overall survival (7.1 versus 9.4 months, P = 0.29). However, in 67% of PET-negative patients, cetuximab dose escalation (750-1250 mg/m²) was applied, potentially influencing outcome in this group. None of the second [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT was positive. Eighty percent of patients without visual tumor uptake had treatment benefit, making [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT unsuitable as a predictive biomarker. Tumor SUV_peak did not correlate to changes in tumor size on CT (P = 0.23), treatment benefit, nor progression-free survival. Cetuximab pharmacokinetics were not related to treatment benefit. BRAF mutations, right-sidedness, and low sEGFR were correlated with intrinsic resistance to cetuximab.

CONCLUSION

Tumor uptake on [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-cetuximab PET/CT failed to predict treatment benefit in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC receiving cetuximab monotherapy. BRAF mutations, right-sidedness, and low sEGFR correlated with intrinsic resistance to cetuximab.

Population pharmacokinetics and covariate analysis of Sym004, an antibody mixture against the epidermal growth factor receptor, in subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer and other solid tumors

Sym004 is an equimolar mixture of two monoclonal antibodies, futuximab and modotuximab, which non-competitively block the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Sym004 has been clinically tested for treatment of solid tumors. The present work characterizes the non-linear pharmacokinetics (PK) of Sym004 and its constituent antibodies and investigates two types of covariate models for interpreting the interindividual variability of Sym004 exposure. Sym004 serum concentration data from 330 cancer patients participating in four Phase 1 and 2 trials (n = 247 metastatic colorectal cancer, n = 87 various types advanced solid tumors) were pooled for non-linear mixed effects modeling. Dose regimens of 0.4-18 mg/kg Sym004 dosed by i.v. infusion weekly or every 2nd week were explored. The PK profiles for futuximab and modotuximab were parallel, and the parameter values for their population PK models were similar. The PK of Sym004 using the sum of the serum concentrations of futuximab and modotuximab was well captured by a 2-compartment model with parallel linear and saturable, Michaelis-Menten-type elimination. The full covariate model including all plausible covariates included in a single step showed no impact on Sym004 exposure of age, Asian race, renal and hepatic function, tumor type and previous anti-EGFR treatments. The reduced covariate model contained statistically and potentially clinically significant influences of body weight, albumin, sex and baseline tumor size. Population PK modeling and covariate analysis of Sym004 were feasible using the sum of the serum concentrations of the two constituent antibodies. Full and reduced covariate models provided insights into which covariates may be clinically relevant for dose modifications and thus may need further exploration.

Removal of interstitial hyaluronan with recombinant human hyaluronidase improves the systemic and lymphatic uptake of cetuximab in rats

Interstitial, e.g. subcutaneous (SC) or intradermal (ID), administration of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) is less invasive than intravenous administration and leads to mAb uptake into both lymphatic and blood capillaries draining the injection site. Interstitial administration, however, is hindered by the presence of hyaluronan (HA), a glycosaminoglycan that is a major fluid barrier in the interstitial space. The transient removal of HA with recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) helps facilitate the interstitial administration of often high therapeutic doses of mAb in the clinic. rHuPH20's impact on the systemic pharmacokinetics of several mAbs has been previously described, however effects on route of absorption (lymph vs blood) are unknown. The current study has therefore explored the lymphatic transport and bioavailability of cetuximab and trastuzumab after SC and ID coadministration in the presence and absence of rHuPH20 in rats. After SC administration cetuximab absolute bioavailability increased from 67 % to 80 % in the presence of rHuPH20. Cetuximab recovery in the lymphatics also increased after SC (35.8 % to 49.4 %) and ID (26.7 % to 58.8 %) administration in the presence of rHuPH20. When the injection volume (and therefore dose) was increased 10-fold in the presence of rHuPH20 cetuximab plasma exposure increased approximately linearly (12- and 8.9-fold respectively after SC and ID administration), although the proportional contribution of cetuximab lymphatic transport reduced slightly (6.2-fold increase for both administration routes). In contrast, co-administration with rHuPH20 did not lead to increases in plasma exposure for trastuzumab after SC or ID administration, most likely reflecting the fact that the reported absolute bioavailability of trastuzumab (in the absence of rHuPH20) is high (∼77-99 %). However, lymphatic transport of trastuzumab did increase when coadministered ID with rHuPH20 in spite of the lack of change to overall bioavailability. The data suggest that co-administration with rHuPH20 is able to increase the volume of mAb that can be administered interstitially, and in some instances can increase the amount absorbed into both the blood and the lymph. In the current studies the ability of rHuPH20 to enhance interstitial bioavailability was higher for cetuximab where intrinsic interstitial bioavailability was low, when compared to trastuzumab where interstitial bioavailability was high.

Determination of Cetuximab in Plasma by Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Orbitrap With a Stable Labeled 13C,15N-Cetuximab Internal Standard

BACKGROUND

Cetuximab (CTX) is a chimeric IgG1 Kappa monoclonal antibody used to treat head and neck cancer and colorectal cancer. Previous clinical studies indicated that the pharmacokinetics of CTX influences patient survival. Thus, individualizing CTX treatment by measuring trough levels of the drug in plasma could have a major impact on clinical efficacy.

METHODS

To measure these levels, a full-length stable isotope-labeled CTX standard was used in a generic, rapid, and high-throughput sample preparation protocol based on IgG capture followed by trypsin digestion, on-line solid-phase extraction cleanup, and liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS).

RESULTS

The optimized method displayed good analytical performance and was linear over a range from 5 to 150 mcg/mL. The within-run and between-run imprecision of the assay were equal to or less than 10%, for 6 replicates at 3 different concentrations and for runs performed on 5 separate days. The plasma CTX concentrations in 19 patients were also determined.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that quantification of mAb in clinical samples does not strictly require a tandem mass spectrometry system, and LC-HRMS is also relevant in this context. This first study implementing a quantitative LC-HRMS assay with a specific stable isotope-labeled mAb internal standard paves the way for more robust clinical monitoring of anticancer mAbs.

Optimizing drug development in oncology by clinical trial simulation: Why and how?

In therapeutic research, the safety and efficacy of pharmaceutical products are necessarily tested on humans via clinical trials after an extensive and expensive preclinical development period. Methodologies such as computer modeling and clinical trial simulation (CTS) might represent a valuable option to reduce animal and human assays. The relevance of these methods is well recognized in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics from the preclinical phase to postmarketing. However, they are barely used and are poorly regarded for drug approval, despite Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency recommendations. The generalization of CTS could be greatly facilitated by the availability of software for modeling biological systems, by clinical trial studies and hospital databases. Data sharing and data merging raise legal, policy and technical issues that will need to be addressed. Development of future molecules will have to use CTS for faster development and thus enable better patient management. Drug activity modeling coupled with disease modeling, optimal use of medical data and increased computing speed should allow this leap forward. The realization of CTS requires not only bioinformatics tools to allow interconnection and global integration of all clinical data but also a universal legal framework to protect the privacy of every patient. While recognizing that CTS can never replace 'real-life' trials, they should be implemented in future drug development schemes to provide quantitative support for decision-making. This in silico medicine opens the way to the P4 medicine: predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory.

Potential prognostic factors for predicting the chemotherapeutic outcomes and prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to explore whether pretreatment potential prognostic factors are related to chemotherapeutic outcomes and the prognosis of inpatients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing chemotherapy.

Materials and methods

Data from 71 patients with mCRC were analyzed retrospectively. The relationship between the potential prognostic factors before first‐line chemotherapy and the clinicopathological characteristics and chemotherapy response of the patients was calculated using Fisher's exact test and the chi‐square test. The prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. We analyzed the subgroups using the Mann‐Whitney U test.

Results

Four factors were eventually used as prognostic factors, namely the albumin‐to‐globulin ratio (AGR), the fibrinogen‐to‐albumin ratio (FAR), the prealbumin‐to‐globulin ratio (PGR), and the fibrinogen‐to‐prealbumin ratio (FPR); the cutoff values of the four potential prognostic factors were 1.40, 10.63, 5.44, and 18.49, respectively. The high AGR and PGR groups had a higher response rate than that of the low groups. Patients in the low FAR and FPR groups showed a higher objective response rate than the high FAR and FPR groups. Patients with low FPR were associated with a higher disease control rate than patients with high FPR. Higher progression‐free survival (PFS) was observed in the high AGR and PGR and low FAR and FPR groups. The AGR, FAR, PGR, and FPR were considered reliable prognostic factors for PFS in a univariate analysis.

Conclusions

The prechemotherapy AGR, FAR, PGR, and FPR were good prognostic factors to predict the chemotherapy response and PFS in patients with mCRC.

Development of an Enzyme-Linked Immune Sorbent Assay to Measure Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab Serum Concentrations

BACKGROUND

Treatment with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against programmed cell death protein 1 receptor is subject to high variation in treatment outcome among cancer patients. For these agents, no exposure-response (ER) relationships have been investigated in routine health care settings. However, ER relationships have been identified for several other mAbs used in oncology. Methods to conveniently measure serum concentrations of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 mAbs in routine health care may clarify possible ER relationships. Therefore, the authors aimed to develop an enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA) for the measurement of both nivolumab and pembrolizumab serum concentrations of treated cancer patients.

METHODS

Optimal capture antigen and detection antibody concentrations were selected based on titrations. Nivolumab calibration standards ranging from 0.2 to 300 ng/mL were tested in duplicate. Accuracy was assessed in 2 recovery experiments. Intra- and interassay variations were assessed on 3 different days by 2 independent technicians. The developed ELISA was also set up for pembrolizumab calibration curves. Cross-reactivity of nivolumab measurements with ipilimumab was assessed. Of one nivolumab treated patient, serum concentrations in follow up samples were measured and presented.

RESULTS

Nivolumab calibration standards of 0.20-25 ng/mL were used. Nivolumab trough concentrations after 1 cycle in 8 patients ranged from 17.3 to 31.1 mcg/mL. The range of accuracy was 84%-105%, whereas intra- and interassay variations showed a coefficient of variation of 5.5% and 10.1%, respectively. No cross-reactivity with ipilimumab was detected. Pembrolizumab trough concentrations (n = 8) ranged from 9.1 to 19.7 mcg/mL after 1 infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The in-house-developed ELISA provides the opportunity to measure both nivolumab and pembrolizumab serum concentrations. This may help identify possible ER relationships in treated cancer patients and may potentially lead to dose adjustments in the future.

Cetuximab pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics relationships in advanced head and neck carcinoma patients

AIMS

Cetuximab associated with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil is used to treat patients with inoperable or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) up until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. To date, no biomarkers of efficacy are available to select patients who will benefit from treatment.

METHODS

An ancillary pharmacokinetics (PK) exploration was performed in the context of a prospective study investigating circulating-tumour cells vs progression-free survival (PFS). Cetuximab plasma concentrations were analysed according to a population PK model. Individual exposure parameters were confronted with soluble epidermal growth factor receptor (sEGFR) concentrations, tumour response and PFS.

RESULTS

PK data (28 patients, 203 observations) were best described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination. Performance status (PS) significantly correlated to both cetuximab clearance and central volume of distribution with both parameters increasing by 33.3% (95% CI 1-65.6) for each 1-point increase of PS compared to PS = 0. Univariate analysis showed that patients with higher trough cetuximab concentrations at Day 7 (C_min,D7 ) had better tumour response (P = 0.03) and longer PFS (P = 0.035). However, multivariate analysis revealed that only PS and tumour size at baseline remained significantly associated with PFS. Levels of sEGFR increased during cetuximab treatment but were not associated with PFS in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study prospectively indicates that PS is likely a confounding factor in the relationship between cetuximab PK and PFS, patients with a poor PS having lower cetuximab plasma exposure and lower PFS.

Ratiometric Bioluminescent Sensor Proteins Based on Intramolecular Split Luciferase Complementation

Bioluminescent sensor proteins provide attractive tools for applications ranging from in vivo imaging to point-of-care testing. Here we introduce a new class of ratiometric bioluminescent sensor proteins that do not rely on direct modulation of BRET efficiency, but are based on competitive intramolecular complementation of split NanoLuc luciferase. Proof of concept for the feasibility of this sensor principle was provided by developing a blue-red light emitting sensor protein for the detection of anti-HIV1-p17 antibodies with a 500% change in emission ratio and a K_d of 10 pM. The new sensor design also improved the dynamic response of a sensor for the therapeutic antibody cetuximab 4-fold, allowing the direct quantification of this anti-EGFR antibody in undiluted blood plasma. The modular sensor architecture allows easy and systematic tuning of a sensor's dynamic range and should be generally applicable to allow rational engineering of bioluminescent sensor proteins.

Correlation between nivolumab exposure and treatment outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Nivolumab treatment is subject to large interpatient variability in both efficacy and toxicity, which may partly be explained by differences in nivolumab exposure. Exposure-response relationships in regular healthcare have not been extensively investigated for nivolumab. Therefore, we aimed to identify possible exposure-response relationships in nivolumab-treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with NSCLC who started second-line nivolumab therapy (3 mg/kg Q2W) between May 5th 2016 and August 1st 2017, and from whom serial blood samples, toxicity data and outcome data were prospectively collected, were included. Follow-up was carried out until November 1st 2017. Patients were classified according to the best overall response (BOR) based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, v1.1, and toxicities according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Nivolumab trough concentrations were measured after 2, 4 and 10 weeks of treatment, excluding dose delays, and calculated geometric means were tested versus BOR or toxicity using analysis of variance and an independent samples t-test, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were compared between high and low trough concentration groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were evaluable for analyses. Responders (n = 15) had higher mean trough concentrations than patients with progression (n = 33): 47% higher after 2 weeks (p = 0.001), 53% higher after 4 weeks (p = 0.008) and 73% higher after 10 weeks (p = 0.002). Higher trough concentrations were associated with longer OS (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that patients with NSCLC with a response to nivolumab had a higher nivolumab exposure than patients with progression, indicating a potential exposure-response relationship. Further clinical research should focus on clarifying these exposure-response relationships.

Retreatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer: Systematic review of different strategies

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in precision oncology and immunotherapy of tumors, little progress has been made in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in recent years. Therefore, making the most of available therapies is a necessity. Several studies, based on the pulsatile behavior of RAS clones under EGFR blockade, investigated whether readministration of EGFR-targeted agents is effective beyond second line.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies of retreatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies has been performed from January 2005 to December 2018 according to PRISMA criteria from PubMed, ESMO and ASCO meetings libraries and Clinicaltrial.gov. Efficacy has been evaluated as objective response rate and survival in available publications. In addition, type and incidence of side effects occurring during on anti-EGFR retreatment have been considered.

RESULTS

26 publications have been retrieved, of which 20 full-text articles and 6 abstracts and categorized as for the retreatment strategy into five groups: rechallenge (n = 10), reintroduction (n = 4), sequence (n = 5), dose escalation (n = 1) and mixed (n = 6). Data of efficacy displayed high heterogeneity across different strategies (objective response rate, ORR = 0.0-53.8%; disease control rate, DCR = 24.0-89.7%), with best results in the setting of rechallenge (ORR = 2.9-53.8%; DCR = 40.0-89.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Rechallenge with anti-EGFR provides clinical benefit in molecularly selected mCRC patients beyond second line. Further ctDNA-guided studies comparing this option of treatment with current approved advanced line treatments are warranted.

Strategies for clinical development of monoclonal antibodies beyond first-in-human trials: tested doses and rationale for dose selection

BACKGROUND

Our previous survey on first-in-human trials (FIHT) of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) showed that, due to their limited toxicity, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was only tentatively defined.

METHODS

We identified, by MEDLINE search, articles on single-agent trials of mAbs with an FIHT included in our previous survey. For each mAb, we examined tested dose(s) and dose selection rationale in non-FIHTs (NFIHTs). We also assessed the correlation between doses tested in the registration trials (RTs) of all FDA-approved mAbs and the corresponding FIHT results.

RESULTS

In the 37 dose-escalation NFIHTs, the RP2D indication was still poorly defined. In phase II-III NFIHTs (n=103 on 37 mAbs), the FIHT RP2D was the only dose tested for five mAbs. For 16 mAbs, only doses different from the FIHT RP2D or the maximum administered dose (MAD) were tested and the dose selection rationale infrequently indicated. In the 60 RTs on 27 FDA-approved mAbs with available FIHT, the FIHT RP2D was tested only for two mAbs, and RT doses were much lower than the FIHT MAD.

CONCLUSIONS

The rationale beyond dose selection in phase II and III trials of mAbs is often unclear in published articles and not based on FIHT data.

Dual-Color Bioluminescent Sensor Proteins for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antitumor Antibodies

Monitoring the levels of therapeutic antibodies in individual patients would allow patient-specific dose optimization, with the potential for major therapeutic and financial benefits. Our group recently developed a new platform of bioluminescent sensor proteins (LUMABS; LUMinescent AntiBody Sensor) that allow antibody detection directly in blood plasma. In this study, we targeted four clinically important therapeutic antibodies, the Her2-receptor targeting trastuzumab, the anti-CD20 antibodies rituximab and obinutuzumab, and the EGFR-blocking cetuximab. A strong correlation was found between the affinity of the antibody binding peptide and sensor performance. LUMABS sensors with physiologically relevant affinities and decent sensor responses were obtained for trastuzumab and cetuximab using mimotope and meditope peptides, respectively, with affinities in the 10^-7 M range. The lower affinity of the CD20-derived cyclic peptide employed in the anti-CD20 LUMABS sensor ( K_d = 10^-5 M), translated in a LUMABS sensor with a strongly attenuated sensor response. The trastuzumab and cetuximab sensors were further characterized with respect to binding kinetics and their performance in undiluted blood plasma. For both antibodies, LUMABS-based detection directly in plasma compared well to the analytical performance of commercial ELISA kits. Besides identifying important design parameters for the development of new LUMABS sensors, this work demonstrates the potential of the LUMABS platform for point-of-care detection of therapeutic antibodies.

Influence of FCGR3A-158V/F Genotype and Baseline CD20 Antigen Count on Target-Mediated Elimination of Rituximab in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Study of FILO Group

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Rituximab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody approved in the first-line treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Rituximab pharmacokinetics shows a time dependency possibly related to changes in the target antigen amount over time. The purpose of this study was to quantify the influence of both CD20 antigenic mass and the FcγRIIIA genetic polymorphism on rituximab pharmacokinetics in CLL.

METHODS

Rituximab pharmacokinetics was described in 118 CLL patients using a semi-mechanistic model including a latent target antigen turnover, which allowed the estimation of rituximab target-mediated elimination in addition to the endogenous clearance.

RESULTS

Target-mediated elimination rate constant increased with the baseline CD20 count on circulating B cells (p = 0.00046) and in patients with the FCGR3A-158VV genotype (p = 0.0016). Physiologic elimination of antigen was lower in the Binet C disease stage (p = 0.00018). The effects of these covariates on rituximab concentrations were mainly visible at the beginning of treatment. Body surface area also increased central and peripheral volumes of distribution (p = 1.3 × 10^-5 and 0.0015, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A pharmacokinetic model including target-mediated elimination accurately described rituximab concentrations in CLL and showed that rituximab 'consumption' (target-mediated elimination) increases with increasing baseline antigen count on circulating B cells and in FCGR3A-158VV patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01370772.

Development and validation of an ELISA to study panitumumab pharmacokinetics

Aim: Panitumumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against EGFR that is approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. To investigate its pharmacokinetics and concentration–response relationship, a validated assay is required. Results: An ELISA assay was developed and validated according to international recommendations. Six calibrators (ranging from 0.1 to 20 mg/l) plus one anchor point (50 mg/l) and three quality controls (0.45, 2 and 8 mg/l) were defined. The limit of detection, lower limit of quantification and upper limit of quantification were 0.033, 0.112 and 10 mg/l, respectively. Conclusion: This method is validated and can be used to study pharmacokinetics of panitumumab or to perform therapeutic drug monitoring.

Cetuximab Pharmacokinetics Influences Overall Survival in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

BACKGROUND

A retrospective study was conducted to analyze interindividual variability of cetuximab pharmacokinetics and its influence on survival (progression-free survival and overall survival [OS]) in a cohort of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

Thirty-four patients received cetuximab as an infusion loading dose of 400 mg/m followed by weekly infusions of 250 mg/m. Twenty-one patients had locally advanced HNSCC, and 13 had metastatic/recurrent HNSCC. Cetuximab concentrations were measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and its pharmacokinetics was analyzed by a population approach. Survivals were analyzed with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Cetuximab pharmacokinetics was best described using a 2-compartment model with both first-order and saturable (zero-order) eliminations. Estimated pharmacokinetic parameters (%CV) were central volume of distribution V1 = 3.18 L (6%), peripheral volume of distribution V2 = 5.4 L (42%), elimination clearance CL = 0.57 L/d (31%), distribution clearance Q = 0.64 L/d, and zero-order elimination rate k0 = 6.72 mg/d (29%). Both V1 and V2 increased with the body surface area. Adjunction of chemotherapy reduced CL and increased k0. OS was inversely related with cetuximab global clearance (P = 0.007) and was higher in patients with severe radiation dermatitis (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Cetuximab pharmacokinetics in patients with HNSCC can be described using a 2-compartment model combining linear and nonlinear mechanisms of elimination. OS is associated with both cetuximab global clearance and severe radiation dermatitis.