Semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of the antitumor activity of LY2835219, a new cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, in mice bearing human tumor xenografts

Assay for the quantification of abemaciclib, its metabolites, and olaparib in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

An isotope-dilution bioanalytical assay for abemaciclib and its metabolites in combination with olaparib was developed and validated in human plasma K2 EDTA. For the quantitative assay, human plasma samples (or human plasma QC samples) were spiked with internal standard solution before a simple protein precipitation with methanol. The extract was injected onto a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) instrument where it was chromatographically separated by a polar end-capped reversed phase column and guard using gradient elution with water and methanol both modified with 0.2 % formic acid (v/v) as the mobile phases. The analytes and internal standards were measured by heated electrospray ionization (HESI) in positive polarity using selected reaction monitoring (SRM) on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. The assay was validated for linear ranges as follows: 0.4 - 1000 nM abemaciclib, 0.35 - 1000 nM M2 and M18, 0.5 - 1000 nM M20, and 0.75 - 1000 nM olaparib. The inter-day or between day precision for the quality controls (n = 18) was < 13 % and the accuracy was ± 12 %, for all analytes, including the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). The intra-day or within day precision for the quality controls (n = 6) was ≤ 11 % and the accuracy was ± 12 % for low, mid, and high and < 19 % at LLOQ. The recovery in human plasma was determined to be between 92 % and 102 % for all analytes spanning the linear range. The validated, bioanalytical quantitative assay was designed to measure abemaciclib, its metabolites, and olaparib for pharmacokinetic evaluation of patients in clinical trials for breast, brain, and ovarian cancers.

A comprehensive review of computational cell cycle models in guiding cancer treatment strategies

This article reviews the current knowledge and recent advancements in computational modeling of the cell cycle. It offers a comparative analysis of various modeling paradigms, highlighting their unique strengths, limitations, and applications. Specifically, the article compares deterministic and stochastic models, single-cell versus population models, and mechanistic versus abstract models. This detailed analysis helps determine the most suitable modeling framework for various research needs. Additionally, the discussion extends to the utilization of these computational models to illuminate cell cycle dynamics, with a particular focus on cell cycle viability, crosstalk with signaling pathways, tumor microenvironment, DNA replication, and repair mechanisms, underscoring their critical roles in tumor progression and the optimization of cancer therapies. By applying these models to crucial aspects of cancer therapy planning for better outcomes, including drug efficacy quantification, drug discovery, drug resistance analysis, and dose optimization, the review highlights the significant potential of computational insights in enhancing the precision and effectiveness of cancer treatments. This emphasis on the intricate relationship between computational modeling and therapeutic strategy development underscores the pivotal role of advanced modeling techniques in navigating the complexities of cell cycle dynamics and their implications for cancer therapy.

Limited clinical activity of palbociclib and ribociclib monotherapy in advanced cancers with cyclin D-CDK4/6 pathway alterations in the Dutch DRUP and Australian MoST trials

The Dutch Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP) and the Australian Cancer Molecular Screening and Therapeutic (MoST) Program are similar nonrandomized, multidrug, pan-cancer trial platforms that aim to identify signals of clinical activity of molecularly matched targeted therapies or immunotherapies outside their approved indications. Here, we report results for advanced or metastatic cancer patients with tumors harboring cyclin D-CDK4/6 pathway alterations treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib or ribociclib. We included adult patients that had therapy-refractory solid malignancies with the following alterations: amplifications of CDK4, CDK6, CCND1, CCND2 or CCND3, or complete loss of CDKN2A or SMARCA4. Within MoST, all patients were treated with palbociclib, whereas in DRUP, palbociclib and ribociclib were assigned to different cohorts (defined by tumor type and alteration). The primary endpoint for this combined analysis was clinical benefit, defined as confirmed objective response or stable disease ≥16 weeks. We treated 139 patients with a broad variety of tumor types; 116 with palbociclib and 23 with ribociclib. In 112 evaluable patients, the objective response rate was 0% and clinical benefit rate at 16 weeks was 15%. Median progression-free survival was 4 months (95% CI: 3-5 months), and median overall survival 5 months (95% CI: 4-6 months). In conclusion, only limited clinical activity of palbociclib and ribociclib monotherapy in patients with pretreated cancers harboring cyclin D-CDK4/6 pathway alterations was observed. Our findings indicate that monotherapy use of palbociclib or ribociclib is not recommended and that merging data of two similar precision oncology trials is feasible.

Cost Effectiveness of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women in the USA

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors improve progression-free survival when combined with endocrine therapies in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. However, the comparative cost effectiveness of utilizing three US Food and Drug Administration-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of individual CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib) with letrozole versus letrozole monotherapy in the first-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the USA.

METHODS

We constructed a Markov-based decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapies over a 40-year lifetime from a third-party payer perspective. The model incorporated health states (progression-free disease, progressive disease, and death), major adverse events (neutropenia), and cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. Using clinical efficacy and quality-of-life scores (utility) data from clinical trials, we estimated quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using Medicare charges reported in US dollars per 2022 valuation and a discount rate of 3% applied to costs and outcomes. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to evaluate parametric and decision uncertainty.

RESULTS

Compared to letrozole, the model estimated an increase of 5.72, 5.87, and 6.39 in QALYs and costs of $799,178, $788,168, and $741,102 in combining palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib plus letrozole, respectively. Palbociclib or ribociclib plus letrozole were dominated by abemaciclib plus letrozole. Compared with letrozole, abemaciclib plus letrozole resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $457,538 per QALY with an incremental cost of $553,621 and an incremental QALY gain of 1.21. The results were sensitive to the cost of abemaciclib, disease progression utility, and patients' age.

CONCLUSIONS

At a willingness to pay of $100,000/QALY gained, our model predicts that combining CDK4/6 inhibitors plus letrozole is not cost effective with a marginal increase in QALYs at a high cost. Lowering the cost of these drugs or identifying patients who can receive maximal benefit from CDK4/6 inhibitors would improve the value of this regimen in patients.

Therapeutic Strategies for Targeting CDKN2A Loss in Melanoma

Loss of the tumor suppressor gene CDKN2A, encoding p16 and p14, is a frequent event driving melanoma progression. Therefore, therapeutic strategies aimed at CDKN2A loss hold great potential to improve melanoma treatment. Pharmacological inhibition of the p16 targets CDK4/6 is a prime example of such a strategy. Other approaches exploit cell cycle deregulation, target metabolic rewiring, epigenetically restore expression, act on dependencies resulting from co-deleted genes, or are directed at the effects of CDKN2A loss on immune responses. This review explores these therapeutic strategies targeting CDKN2A loss, which potentially open up new avenues for precision medicine in melanoma.

The protective effect of curcumin on cardiac markers and fibrosis in abemaciclib-induced cardiac damage in rats

Abemaciclib (ABE) is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor used in combination with an antiestrogen in the treatment of breast cancer. In addition to the important therapeutic properties of this drug, its side effects are not fully known. In this study, we aimed to investigate the protective effect of curcumin (CUR) on cardiac damage caused by ABE administration. Forty rats were equally divided into control, dimethyl sulfoxide (150 µL), CUR (30 mg/kg/day), ABE (26 mg/kg/day), and ABE + CUR (26 mg/kg/day ABE and 30mg/kg/day CUR) groups (n = 8). Injections were administered daily for 28 days. Troponin-I, total cholesterol, and creatine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB) levels and cardiac fibrosis were higher in the ABE group than in the control group (p < 0.05), and were lower in the ABE + CUR group than in the ABE group (p < 0.05). The results showed that ABE administration can cause cardiac damage and increase cardiac fibrosis. However, they showed that coadministration of CUR with ABE could suppress increases in CK-MB, troponin-I, and total cholesterol levels and also cardiac fibrosis associated with cardiac damage. Therefore, we can infer that the subsequent administration of CUR ABE treatment can be used as a therapeutic strategy for preventing cardiac damage.

Targeting CDK4 and 6 in Cancer Therapy: Emerging Preclinical Insights Related to Abemaciclib

Pharmacologic inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4 and 6) are approved for the treatment of subsets of patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). In metastatic disease, strategies involving endocrine therapy combined with CDK4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4 and 6i) improve clinical outcomes in HR+ BCs. CDK4 and 6i prevent retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein phosphorylation, thereby blocking the transcription of E2F target genes, which in turn inhibits both mitogen and estrogen-mediated cell proliferation. In this review, we summarize preclinical data pertaining to the use of CDK4 and 6i in BC, with a particular focus on several of the unique chemical, pharmacologic, and mechanistic properties of abemaciclib. As research efforts elucidate the novel mechanisms underlying abemaciclib activity, potential new applications are being identified. For example, preclinical studies have demonstrated abemaciclib can exert antitumor activity against multiple tumor types and can cross the blood-brain barrier. Abemaciclib has also demonstrated distinct activity as a monotherapeutic in the treatment of BC. Accordingly, we also discuss how a greater understanding of mechanisms related to CDK4 and 6 blockade highlight abemaciclib's unique in-class properties, and could pave new avenues for enhancing its therapeutic efficacy.

Recent advances in targeting protein kinases and pseudokinases in cancer biology

Kinases still remain the most favorable members of the druggable genome, and there are an increasing number of kinase inhibitors approved by the FDA to treat a variety of cancers. Here, we summarize recent developments in targeting kinases and pseudokinases with some examples. Targeting the cell cycle machinery garnered significant clinical success, however, a large section of the kinome remains understudied. We also review recent developments in the understanding of pseudokinases and discuss approaches on how to effectively target in cancer.

Structure-guided design and development of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors: A review on therapeutic implications

Cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (EC 2.7.11.22) play significant roles in numerous biological processes and triggers cell cycle events. CDK6 controlled the transcriptional regulation. A dysregulated function of CDK6 is linked with the development of progression of multiple tumor types. Thus, it is considered as an effective drug target for cancer therapy. Based on the direct roles of CDK4/6 in tumor development, numerous inhibitors developed as promising anti-cancer agents. CDK4/6 inhibitors regulate the G1 to S transition by preventing Rb phosphorylation and E2F liberation, showing potent anti-cancer activity in several tumors, including HR+/HER2- breast cancer. CDK4/6 inhibitors such as abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib, control cell cycle, provoke cell senescence, and induces tumor cell disturbance in pre-clinical studies. Here, we discuss the roles of CDK6 in cancer along with the present status of CDK4/6 inhibitors in cancer therapy. We further discussed, how structural features of CDK4/6 could be implicated in the design and development of potential anti-cancer agents. In addition, the therapeutic potential and limitations of available CDK4/6 inhibitors are described in detail. Recent pre-clinical and clinical information for CDK4/6 inhibitors are highlighted. In addition, combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with other drugs for the therapeutic management of cancer are discussed.

CDK4/CDK6 Inhibitors Synergize with Midostaurin, Avapritinib, and Nintedanib in Inducing Growth Inhibition in KIT D816V+ Neoplastic Mast Cells

In most patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM), neoplastic mast cells (MC) express KIT D816V. However, despite their disease-modifying potential, KIT D816V-targeting drugs, including midostaurin and avapritinib, may not produce long-term remissions in all patients. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and CDK6 are promising targets in oncology. We found that shRNA-mediated knockdown of CDK4 and CDK6 results in growth arrest in the KIT D816V+ MC line HMC-1.2. The CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib suppressed the proliferation in primary neoplastic MC as well as in all HMC-1 and ROSA cell subclones that were examined. Abemaciclib was also found to block growth in the drug-resistant MC line MCPV-1, whereas no effects were seen with palbociclib and ribociclib. Anti-proliferative drug effects on MC were accompanied by cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors were found to synergize with the KIT-targeting drugs midostaurin, avapritinib, and nintedanib in inducing growth inhibition and apoptosis in neoplastic MCs. Finally, we found that CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors induce apoptosis in CD34+/CD38- stem cells in AdvSM. Together, CDK4/CDK6 inhibition is a potent approach to suppress the growth of neoplastic cells in AdvSM. Whether CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors can improve clinical outcomes in patients with AdvSM remains to be determined in clinical trials.

A look at current and potential treatment approaches for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer

The heterogeneity of hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancers reinforces the importance of individualized, risk-adapted treatment approaches. Numerous factors contribute to the risk for recurrence, including clinical tumor features, individual biomarkers, and genomic risk. Current standard approaches for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, early stage disease focus on endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. The specific treatment regimen and duration of adjuvant therapy should be selected based on accurate risk assessment, tolerability of available therapies, and consideration for patient preferences. For patients with high-risk features, such as highly proliferative tumors, large tumor size, and significant nodal involvement, the risk for recurrence remains clinically significant despite appropriate adjuvant treatment with current standards of care. This has driven investigation into novel treatment approaches, including the addition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors to adjuvant endocrine therapy. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibition has demonstrated significant efficacy in patients with high-risk, HR-positive, HER2-negative, nonmetastatic breast cancer and now offers a new strategy to greatly improve outcomes in this difficult to treat patient population.; LAY SUMMARY: Hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancers are highly diverse and need to be managed differently for individual patients. The use of adjuvant endocrine therapy and chemotherapy should be driven by a patient's risk for recurrence, preferences, and risk for side effects. Patients with high-risk tumors have a persistently elevated risk for recurrence despite current standards of care. Emerging cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors are highly effective when added to endocrine therapy in high-risk, HR-positive early breast cancer and have the potential to improve patient outcomes in this difficult to treat patient population.

Abemaciclib-loaded ethylcellulose based nanosponges for sustained cytotoxicity against MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells lines

Abemaciclib (AC) is a novel, orally available drug molecule approved for the treatment of breast cancer. Due to its low bioavailability, its administration frequency is two to three times a day that can decrease patient compliance. Sustained release formulation are needed for prolong the action and to reduce the adverse effects. The aim of current study was to develop sustained release NSs of AC. Nanosponges (NSs) was prepared by emulsion-solvent diffusion method using ethyl-cellulose (EC) and Kolliphor P-188 (KP-188) as sustained-release polymer and surfactant, respectively. Effects of varying surfactant concentration and drug: polymer proportions on the particle size (PS), polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential (ζP), entrapment efficiency (%EE), and drug loading (%DL) were investigated. The results of AC loaded NSs (ACN1-ACN5) exhibited PS (366.3–842.2 nm), PDI (0.448–0.853), ζP (−8.21 to −19.7 mV), %EE (48.45–79.36%) and %DL (7.69–19.17%), respectively. Moreover, ACN2 showed sustained release of Abemaciclib (77.12 ± 2.54%) in 24 h Higuchi matrix as best fit kinetics model. MTT assay signified ACN2 as potentials cytotoxic nanocarrier against MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. Further, ACN2 displayed drug release property without variation in the % release after exposing the product at 25 °C, 5 °C, and 45 °C storage conditions for six months. This investigation proved that the developed NSs would be an efficient carrier to sustain the release of AC in order to improve efficacy against breast cancer.

An UHPLC-MS/MS method for quantification of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib in human serum

BACKGROUND

Abemaciclib is a new oral targeted treatment option for patients with advanced breast cancer. The emerging field of oral antitumor therapeutics presents challenges for both patients and healthcare teams; non-adherence and high inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability can influence response rates.

METHODS

For monitoring abemaciclib in human sera, a rapid novel ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and fully validated. Sample preparation was based on a protein precipitation step followed by on-line solid phase extraction. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a biphenyl column and the isotope labeled standard abemaciclib-d8 was used for quantification.

RESULTS

The method showed linearity over a wide calibration range from 20.0 to 2500 ng/mL. With accuracies and precisions of ≤13.9% and ≤4.42%, respectively, the validation results were within the criteria of acceptance. The fitness of the method was tested by monitoring abemaciclib levels under compassionate use for a single individual.

CONCLUSIONS

The novelty of the presented two dimensional isotope dilution UHPLC-MS/MS method is in the semi-automated sample preparation, which results in negligible matrix effects, thereby allowing the introduction of abemaciclib into robust routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This method provides an efficient tool to verify the usefulness of personalized anticancer therapy in clinical practice.

R-praziquantel integrated population pharmacokinetics in preschool- and school-aged African children infected with Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium and Lao adults infected with Opisthorchis viverrini

Racemic praziquantel (PZQ) is the standard treatment for schistosomiasis and liver fluke infections (opisthorchiasis and clonorchiasis). The development of an optimal pediatric formulation and dose selection would benefit from a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model. A popPK model was developed for R-PZQ, the active enantiomer of PZQ, in 664 subjects, 493 African children (2-15 years) infected with Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium, and 171 Lao adults (15-78 years) infected with Opisthorchis viverrini. Racemate tablets were administered as single doses of 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg in children and 30, 40 and 50 mg/kg in 129 adults, and as 3 × 25 mg/kg apart in 42 adults. Samples collected by the dried-blood-spot technique were assayed by LC-MS/MS. A two-compartment disposition model, with allometric scaling and dual first-order and transit absorption, was developed using Phoenix™ software. Inversely parallel functions of age described the apparent oral bioavailability (BA) and clearance maturation in children and ageing in adults. BA decreased slightly in children with dose increase, and by 35% in adults with multiple dosing. Crushing tablets for preschool-aged children increased the first-order absorption rate by 64%. The mean transit absorption time was 70% higher in children. A popPK model for R-PZQ integrated African children over 2 years of age with schistosomiasis and Lao adults with opisthorchiasis, and should be useful to support dose optimization in children. In vitro hepatic and intestinal metabolism data would help refining and validating the model in younger children as well as in target ethnic pediatric and adult groups.

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors and Their Therapeutic Potential in Colorectal Cancer Treatment

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are key players in cell cycle regulation. So far, more than ten CDKs have been described. Their direct interaction with cyclins allow progression through G1 phase, transitions to S and G2 phase and finally through mitosis (M). While CDK activation is important in cell renewal, its aberrant expression can lead to the development of malignant tumor cells. Dysregulations in CDK pathways are often encountered in various types of cancer, including all gastrointestinal (GI) tract tumors. This prompted the development of CDK inhibitors as novel therapies for cancer. Currently, CDK inhibitors such as CDK4/6 inhibitors are used in pre-clinical studies for cancer treatment. In this review, we will focus on the therapeutic role of various CDK inhibitors in colorectal cancer, with a special focus on the CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Protein Kinase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Patients

Protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) represent up-to-date therapeutic approach in breast cancer treatment. Although cancer is a rapidly progressive disease, many substances, including PKIs, are usually used at fixed doses without regard to each patient's individuality. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a tool that allows individualization of therapy based on drug plasma levels. For TDM conduct, exposure-response relationships of drug substances are required. The pharmacokinetic data and exposure-response evidence supporting the use of TDM for 6 PKIs used in breast cancer treatment, one of the most common female tumour diseases, are discussed in this review.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 and 6 Inhibitors Palbociclib, Ribociclib, and Abemaciclib

Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib are inhibitors of the cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. In this review, we provide an overview of the available clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of these novel drugs, summarize the results of food-effect and drug-drug interaction studies, and highlight exposure-response and exposure-toxicity relationships. All three drugs exhibit a large inter-individual variability in exposure (coefficient of variation range 40-95% for minimum plasma concentration), are extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4, and have their brain penetration limited by efflux transporters. Abemaciclib has three active metabolites with similar potency that are clinically relevant (i.e., M2, M20, M18), whereas the metabolites of palbociclib and ribociclib are not of clinical significance. Pharmacokinetic exposure increases in a dose-proportional manner for palbociclib, whereas exposure increases under- and over-proportionally with an increasing dose for abemaciclib and ribociclib, respectively. High exposure is associated with an increased risk of neutropenia, and for ribociclib also to corrected QT prolongation. For abemaciclib, a clear exposure-efficacy relationship has been described, while for palbociclib and ribociclib exposure-response analyses remain inconclusive. Future studies are needed to address exposure-efficacy relationships to further improve dosing.

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors in solid tumors: a review of clinical trials

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) play a key regulating role in the cell cycle, which is almost universally altered in cancer, leading to sustained proliferation. Early pan-CDK inhibitors showed poor results in clinical trials for solid malignancies, as the lack of selectivity produced significant toxicity. The production of more selective inhibitors led to significant developments in cancer therapy, as CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy changed the landscape of the treatment of hormone-receptor positive (HR +) metastatic breast cancer. Recently, Trilaciclib demonstrated benefits regarding hematological toxicity compared to placebo when administered in combination with chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer. Newer agents, such as SY-5609, a selective CDK7 inhibitor, have also shown promising results in early clinical trials. In this paper, we review the data from clinical trials of CDK inhibitors in solid tumors, either as a monotherapy or in combination with other agents, with an emphasis on novel agents and potential new indications for this drug class.

Selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors as anticancer drugs: Moving beyond hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

The cyclin D-cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 pathway controls the cell cycle machinery by regulating the G1-to-S-phase transition. Dysregulation of this pathway, resulting in increased cellular proliferation, is frequently observed in a variety of human cancers. Activation of cyclin D-CDK 4/6 pathway can occur through different mechanisms, including gene amplification/rearrangement, loss of negative regulatory factors, epigenetic modifications, and point mutations of different components of this pathway. Quite conspicuously, CDK 4/6 inhibitors have emerged as promising anticancer agents in various tumors in which CDK 4/6 has a pivotal role in the G1-to-S-phase cell cycle transition. The clinical use of first-generation, nonselective pan-CDK inhibitors was not progressed beyond early phase trials, due to unacceptable toxicity and lack of efficacy noted with these agents. The emergence of selective CDK 4/6 inhibitors, including ribociclib, abemaciclib, and palbociclib, has enabled us to effectively target cyclin D-CDK 4/6 pathway, at the cost of acceptable toxicity. The results of landmark phase III trials investigating palbociclib and ribociclib in advanced hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer have demonstrated a substantial clinical benefit with a well-tolerated toxicity profile. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to selective CDK 4/6 inhibitors are beginning to emerge. Clearly, a detailed understanding of these resistance mechanisms is very much essential for the rational development of post-CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapeutic strategies. Extending the use of selective CDK 4/6 inhibitors beyond HR-positive breast cancer is a challenging task and will likely require identification of clinically meaningful biomarkers to predict response and the use of combination approaches to optimize CDK 4/6 targeting.

Development of CDK4/6 Inhibitors: A Five Years Update

The inhibition of cyclin dependent kinases 4 and 6 plays a role in aromatase inhibitor resistant metastatic breast cancer. Three dual CDK4/6 inhibitors have been approved for the breast cancer treatment that, in combination with the endocrine therapy, dramatically improved the survival outcomes both in first and later line settings. The developments of the last five years in the search for new selective CDK4/6 inhibitors with increased selectivity, treatment efficacy, and reduced adverse effects are reviewed, considering the small-molecule inhibitors and proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) approaches, mainly pointing at structure-activity relationships, selectivity against different kinases and antiproliferative activity.

New Insights into CDK Regulators: Novel Opportunities for Cancer Therapy

Cyclins and their catalytic partners, the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), control the transition between different phases of the cell cycle. CDK/cyclin activity is regulated by CDK inhibitors (CKIs), currently comprising the CDK-interacting protein/kinase inhibitory protein (CIP/KIP) family and the inhibitor of kinase (INK) family. Recent studies have identified a third group of CKIs, called ribosomal protein-inhibiting CDKs (RPICs). RPICs were discovered in the context of cellular senescence, a stable cell cycle arrest with tumor-suppressing abilities. RPICs accumulate in the nonribosomal fraction of senescent cells due to a decrease in rRNA biogenesis. Accordingly, RPICs are often downregulated in human cancers together with other ribosomal proteins, the tumor-suppressor functions of which are still under study. In this review, we discuss unique therapies that have been developed to target CDK activity in the context of cancer treatment or senescence-associated pathologies, providing novel tools for precision medicine.

In vitro to Clinical Translation of Combinatorial Effects of Doxorubicin and Abemaciclib in Rb-Positive Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Systems-Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling Approach

Background

Doxorubicin (DOX) and its pegylated liposomal formulation (L_DOX) are the standard of care for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, resistance to DOX often occurs, motivating the search for alternative treatment approaches. The retinoblastoma protein (Rb) is a potential pharmacological target for TNBC treatment since its expression has been associated with resistance to DOX-based therapy.

Methods

DOX (0.01–20 μM) combination with abemaciclib (ABE, 1–6 μM) was evaluated over 72 hours on Rb-positive (MDA-MB-231) and Rb-negative (MDA-MB-468) TNBC cells. Combination indices (CI) for DOX+ABE were calculated using Compusyn software. The TNBC cell viability time-course and fold-change from the control of phosphorylated-Rb (pRb) protein expression were measured with CCK8-kit and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A cell-based pharmacodynamic (PD) model was developed, where pRb protein dynamics drove cell viability response. Clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) models for DOX, L_DOX, and ABE were developed using data extracted from the literature. After scaling cancer cell growth to clinical TNBC tumor growth, the time-to-tumor progression (TTP) was predicted for human dosing regimens of DOX, ABE, and DOX+ABE.

Results

DOX and ABE combinations were synergistic (CI<1) in MDA-MB-231 and antagonistic (CI>1) in MDA-MB-468. The maximum inhibitory effects (Imax) for both drugs were set to one. The drug concentrations producing 50% of Imax for DOX and ABE were 0.565 and 2.31 μM (MDA-MB-231) and 0.121 and 1.61 μM (MDA-MB-468). The first-orders rate constants of abemaciclib absorption (k_a) and doxorubicin release from L_DOX (k_Rel) were estimated at 0.31 and 0.013 h⁻¹. Their linear clearances were 21.7 (ABE) and 32.1 L/h (DOX). The estimated TTP for intravenous DOX (75 mg/m2 every 21 days), intravenous L_DOX (50 mg/m² every 28 days), and oral ABE (200 mg twice a day) were 125, 31.2, and 8.6 days shorter than drug-free control. The TTP for DOX+ABE and L_DOX+ABE were 312 days and 47.5 days shorter than control, both larger than single-agent DOX, suggesting improved activity with the DOX+ABE combination.

Conclusion

The developed translational systems-based PK/PD model provides an in vitro-to-clinic modeling platform for DOX+ABE in TNBC. Although model-based simulations suggest improved outcomes with combination over monotherapy, tumor relapse was not prevented with the combination. Hence, DOX+ABE may not be an effective treatment combination for TNBC.

Inhibiting CDK4/6 in Breast Cancer with Palbociclib, Ribociclib, and Abemaciclib: Similarities and Differences

The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors belong to a new class of drugs that interrupt proliferation of malignant cells by inhibiting progression through the cell cycle. Three such inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib were recently approved for breast cancer treatment in various settings and combination regimens. On the basis of their impressive efficacy, all three CDK4/6 inhibitors now play an important role in the treatment of patients with HR+, HER2- breast cancer; however, their optimal use still needs to be established. The three drugs have many similarities in both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. However, there are some differences on the basis of which the choice for a particular CDK4/6 inhibitor for an individual patient can be important. In this article, the clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the three CDK4/6 inhibitors are reviewed and important future directions of the clinical applicability of CDK4/6 inhibitors will be discussed.

Small-molecule inhibitors of breast cancer-related targets: Potential therapeutic agents for breast cancer

Despite dramatic advances in cancer research and therapy, breast cancer remains a tricky health problem and represents a top biomedical research priority. Nowadays, breast cancer is still the leading cause of malignancy-related deaths in women, and incidence and mortality rates of it are expected to increase significantly the next years. Currently more and more researchers are interested in the study of breast cancer by its arising in young women. The common treatment options of breast cancer are chemotherapy, immunotherapy, hormone therapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Most of them require chemical agents, such as PARP inhibitors, CDK4/6 inhibitors, and HER2 inhibitors. Recent studies suggest that some targets or pathways, including BRD4, PLK1, PD-L1, HDAC, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR, are tightly related to the occurrence and development of breast cancer. This article reviews the interplay between these targets and breast cancer and summarizes the progress of current research on small molecule inhibitors of these anti-breast cancer targets. The review aims to provide structural and theoretical basis for designing novel anti-breast cancer agents.

Preclinical discovery and development of abemaciclib used to treat breast cancer

Introduction: Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have altered the standard-of-care treatment for patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. One such inhibitor, abemaciclib, a reversible ATP-competitive CDK4/6 inhibitor developed by Eli Lilly and Company, was approved by the FDA for ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.Areas covered: Preclinical studies revealed abemaciclib's distinct structure, efficacy as monotherapy, and ability to penetrate the Central Nervous System. In this review, the authors have examined the literature regarding the development of CDK 4/6 inhibitors before providing a focused review on the preclinical discovery and development of abemaciclib. The authors then conclude their manuscript by providing their expert opinion and future perspectives.Expert opinion: Understanding the genesis and evolution from concept to approval and beyond will allow one to analyze the impact of abemaciclib. With its unique characteristics, abemaciclib has provided a meaningful addition to the therapeutic arsenal for metastatic breast cancer. There is, however, a need for predictive biomarkers to identify patients who may not benefit from or may develop resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition.

Abemaciclib, a third CDK 4/6 inhibitor for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

The field of metastatic luminal breast cancer (hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative) is dynamic and evolving, harboring some of the most significant therapeutic advances in medical oncology. Over the last decade, many pivotal trials showed excellent results with drastic improvements in survival as well as the quality of life of metastatic luminal breast cancer patients.

AREAS COVERED

The successful inhibition of the cyclinD/cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6)-retinoblastoma protein (RB) pathway with potent CDK4/6 inhibitors improved the outcome of advanced luminal breast cancers. Abemaciclib is the third CDK 4/6 inhibitor arriving to the market after palbociclib and ribociclib. Here, we describe the biology of the CDK4/6 pathway and summarize clinical data of previously published pivotal trials emphasizing the efficacy and toxicity of abemaciclib. The aim was to define its place in the current guidelines and to make a brief comparison with other available drugs of same class in the absence of cross trials comparison.

EXPERT OPINION

As there are no available biomarkers to predict response or resistance to abemaciclib, the promising overall survival data of MONARCH-2 could possibly impact the clinician's choice to optimize treatment for endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer.

Metformin as a senostatic drug enhances the anticancer efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

CDK4/6 inhibitors show promising antitumor activity in a variety of solid tumors; however, their role in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) requires further investigation. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) induced by CDK4/6 inhibitors has dual effects on cancer treatment. The need to address the SASP is a serious challenge in the clinical application of CDK4/6 inhibitors. We investigated whether metformin can act as a senostatic drug to modulate the SASP and enhance the anticancer efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HNSCC. In this study, the efficacy of a combination of the CDK4/6 inhibitor LY2835219 and metformin in HNSCC was investigated in in vitro assays, an HSC6 xenograft model, and a patient-derived xenograft model. Senescence-associated β-galactosidase staining, antibody array, sphere-forming assay, and in vivo tumorigenesis assay were used to detect the impacts of metformin on the senescence and SASP induced by LY2835219. We found that LY2835219 combined with metformin synergistically inhibited HNSCC by inducing cell cycle arrest in vitro and in vivo. Metformin significantly modulated the profiles of the SASP elicited by LY2835219 by inhibiting the mTOR and stat3 pathways. The LY2835219-induced SASP resulted in upregulation of cancer stemness, while this phenomenon can be attenuated when combined with metformin. Furthermore, results showed that the stemness inhibition by metformin was associated with blockade of the IL6-stat3 axis. Survival analysis demonstrated that overexpression of IL6 and stemness markers was associated with poor survival in HNSCC patients, indicating that including metformin to target these proteins might improve patient prognosis. Collectively, our data suggest that metformin can act as a senostatic drug to enhance the anticancer efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors by reprogramming the profiles of the SASP.

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model of MBQ-167 to Predict Tumor Growth Inhibition in Mice

MBQ-167 is a dual inhibitor of the Rho GTPases Rac and Cdc42 that has shown promising results as an anti-cancer therapeutic at the preclinical stage. This drug has been tested in vitro and in vivo in metastatic breast cancer mouse models. The aim of this study is to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK-PD) model of MBQ-167 to predict tumor growth inhibition following intraperitoneal (IP) administration in mice bearing Triple Negative and HER2+ mammary tumors. PBPK and Simeoni tumor growth inhibition (TGI) models were developed using the Simcyp V19 Animal Simulator. Our developed PBPK framework adequately describes the time course of MBQ-167 in each of the mouse tissues (e.g., lungs, heart, liver, kidneys, spleen, plasma) and tumor, since the predicted results were consistent with the experimental data. The developed PBPK-PD model successfully predicts tumor shrinkage in HER2+ and triple-negative breast tumors after the intraperitoneal administration of 1 and 10 mg/kg body weight (BW) dose level of MBQ-167 three times a week. The findings from this study suggest that MBQ-167 has a higher net effect and potency inhibiting Triple Negative mammary tumor growth compared to HER2+ and that liver metabolism is the major route of elimination of this drug.

Targeting Cell Cycle in Breast Cancer: CDK4/6 Inhibitors

Deregulation of cell cycle, via cyclin D/CDK/pRb pathway, is frequently observed in breast cancer lending support to the development of drugs targeting the cell cycle control machinery, like the inhibitors of the cycline-dependent kinases (CDK) 4 and 6. Up to now, three CDK4/6 inhibitors have been approved by FDA for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. These agents have been effective in improving the clinical outcomes, but the development of intrinsic or acquired resistance can limit the efficacy of these treatments. Clinical and translational research is now focused on investigation of the mechanism of sensitivity/resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition and novel therapeutic strategies aimed to improve clinical outcomes. This review summarizes the available knowledge regarding CDK4/6 inhibitor, the discovery of new biomarkers of response, and the biological rationale for new combination strategies of treatment.

Opportunities for Quantitative Translational Modeling in Oncology

A 2-day meeting was held by members of the UK Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Network () in November 2018 on the topic of Translational Challenges in Oncology. Participants from a wide range of backgrounds were invited to discuss current and emerging modeling applications in nonclinical and clinical drug development, and to identify areas for improvement. This resulting perspective explores opportunities for impactful quantitative pharmacology approaches. Four key themes arose from the presentations and discussions that were held, leading to the following recommendations: Evaluate the predictivity and reproducibility of animal cancer models through precompetitive collaboration. Apply mechanism of action (MoA) based mechanistic models derived from nonclinical data to clinical trial data. Apply MoA reflective models across trial data sets to more robustly quantify the natural history of disease and response to differing interventions. Quantify more robustly the dose and concentration dependence of adverse events through mathematical modelling techniques and modified trial design.

A CRISPR knockout negative screen reveals synergy between CDKs inhibitor and metformin in the treatment of human cancer in vitro and in vivo

Laboratory research and pharmacoepidemiology provide support for metformin as a potential antitumor agent. However, the lack of a clear understanding of the indications of metformin limits its efficacy. Here, we performed a genome-wide CRISPR knockout negative screen to identify potential targets that might synergize with metformin. Next-generation sequencing of pooled genomic DNAs isolated from surviving cells after 18 days of metformin treatment (T18) compared to those of the untreated cells at day 0 (T0) yielded candidate genes. Knockdown of a group of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), including CDK1, CDK4, and CDK6, confirmed the results of the screen. Combination treatment of the CDKs inhibitor abemaciclib with metformin profoundly inhibited tumor viability in vitro and in vivo. Although cell cycle parameters were not further altered under the combination treatment, investigation of the metabolome revealed significant changes in cell metabolism, especially with regard to fatty acid oxidation, the tricarboxylic acid cycle and aspartate metabolism. Such changes appeared to be mediated through inhibition of the mTOR pathway. Collectively, our study suggests that the combination of CDKs inhibitor with metformin could be recognized as a potential therapy in future clinical applications.

Tumor Growth Dynamic Modeling in Oncology Drug Development and Regulatory Approval: Past, Present, and Future Opportunities

Model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches have rapidly advanced in drug development in recent years. Additionally, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) VI has specific commitments to further enhance MIDD. Tumor growth dynamic (TGD) modeling, as one of the commonly utilized MIDD approaches in oncology, fulfills the purposes to accelerate the drug development, to support new drug and biologics license applications, and to guide the market access. Increasing knowledge of TGD modeling methodologies, encouraging applications in clinical setting for patients' survival, and complementing assessment of regulatory review for submissions, together fueled promising potentials for imminent enhancement of TGD in oncology. This review is to comprehensively summarize the history of TGD, and present case examples of the recent advance of TGD modeling (mixture model and joint model), as well as the TGD impact on regulatory decisions, thus illustrating challenges and opportunities. Additionally, this review presents the future perspectives for TGD approach.

Non-BRAF Mutant Melanoma: Molecular Features and Therapeutical Implications

Melanoma is one of the most aggressive tumors of the skin, and its incidence is growing worldwide. Historically considered a drug resistant disease, since 2011 the therapeutic landscape of melanoma has radically changed. Indeed, the improved knowledge of the immune system and its interactions with the tumor, and the ever more thorough molecular characterization of the disease, has allowed the development of immunotherapy on the one hand, and molecular target therapies on the other. The increased availability of more performing technologies like Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), and the availability of increasingly large genetic panels, allows the identification of several potential therapeutic targets. In light of this, numerous clinical and preclinical trials are ongoing, to identify new molecular targets. Here, we review the landscape of mutated non-BRAF skin melanoma, in light of recent data deriving from Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) or Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) studies on melanoma cohorts for which information on the mutation rate of each gene was available, for a total of 10 NGS studies and 992 samples, focusing on available, or in experimentation, targeted therapies beyond those targeting mutated BRAF. Namely, we describe 33 established and candidate driver genes altered with frequency greater than 1.5%, and the current status of targeted therapy for each gene. Only 1.1% of the samples showed no coding mutations, whereas 30% showed at least one mutation in the RAS genes (mostly NRAS) and 70% showed mutations outside of the RAS genes, suggesting potential new roads for targeted therapy. Ongoing clinical trials are available for 33.3% of the most frequently altered genes.

Abemaciclib induces atypical cell death in cancer cells characterized by formation of cytoplasmic vacuoles derived from lysosomes

In the cell cycle, the G₁ /S transition is controlled by the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6-cyclin D complex. Constitutive activation of CDK4/6 dysregulates G₁ /S transition, leading to oncogenic transformation. We found that 3 CDK4/6 inhibitors, abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib, exerted a cytocidal effect as well as a cytostatic effect at the G₁ phase in cancer cell lines, including A549 human non-small cell lung cancer cells. Among these inhibitors, abemaciclib exhibited the most potent cytotoxic effect. The cell-death phenotype induced by abemaciclib, which entailed formation of multiple cytoplasmic vacuoles, was not consistent with apoptosis or necroptosis. Abemaciclib blocked autophagic flux, resulting in accumulation of autophagosomes, however vacuole formation and cell death induced by abemaciclib were independent of autophagy. In addition, methuosis, a cell-death phenotype characterized by vacuole formation induced by excessive macropinocytosis, was excluded because the vacuoles did not incorporate fluorescent dextran. Of note, both formation of vacuoles and induction of cell death in response to abemaciclib were inhibited by vacuolar-type ATPase (V-ATPase) inhibitors such as bafilomycin A1 and concanamycin A. Live-cell imaging revealed that the abemaciclib-induced vacuoles were derived from lysosomes that expanded following acidification. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that these vacuoles contained undigested debris and remnants of organelles. Cycloheximide chase assay revealed that lysosomal turnover was blocked by abemaciclib. Furthermore, mTORC1 inhibition along with partial lysosomal membrane permeabilization occurred after abemaciclib treatment. Together, these results indicate that, in cancer cells, abemaciclib induces a unique form of cell death accompanied by swollen and dysfunctional lysosomes.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: past, present, and future

The development and approval of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer represents a major milestone in cancer therapeutics. Three different oral CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, have significantly improved progression-free survival by a number of months when combined with endocrine therapy. More recently, improvement in overall survival has been reported with ribociclib and abemaciclib. The toxicity profile of all three drugs is well described and generally easily manageable with dose reductions when indicated. More myelotoxicity is observed with palbociclib and ribociclib, but more gastrointestinal toxicity is observed with abemaciclib. Emerging data is shedding light on the resistance mechanisms associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, including cell cycle alterations and activation of upstream tyrosine kinase receptors. A number of clinical trials are exploring several important questions regarding treatment sequencing, combinatorial strategies, and the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, thereby further expanding and refining the clinical application of CDK4/6 inhibitors for patients with breast cancer.

An Update on the Clinical Use of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer

Deregulated cell division, resulting in aberrant cell proliferation, is one of the key hallmarks of cancer. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) play a central role in cell cycle progression in cancer, and the clinical development of the CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib has changed clinical practice in the setting of endocrine-receptor positive breast cancer. Results of pivotal phase II and III trials investigating these CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with endocrine receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer have demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival, with a safe toxicity profile. No validated biomarkers of sensitivity or resistance exist at the moment. Future development of CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer should focus on the identification of predictive biomarkers, the development of drug combinations to overcome resistance, and the application of CDK4/6 inhibitors to other breast cancer subtypes.

A Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Abemaciclib in a Phase I Clinical Trial in Cancer Patients

Background and Objectives

Abemaciclib, a dual inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6, has demonstrated clinical activity in a number of different cancer types. The objectives of this study were to characterize the pharmacokinetics of abemaciclib in cancer patients using population pharmacokinetic (popPK) modeling, and to evaluate target engagement at clinically relevant dose levels.

Methods

A phase I study was conducted in cancer patients which incorporated intensive pharmacokinetic sampling after single and multiple oral doses of abemaciclib. Data were analyzed by popPK modeling, and patient demographics contributing to pharmacokinetic variability were explored. Target engagement was evaluated by combining the clinical popPK model with a previously developed pre-clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

Results

The pharmacokinetic analysis incorporated 4012 plasma concentrations from 224 patients treated with abemaciclib at doses ranging from 50 to 225 mg every 24 h and 75 to 275 mg every 12 h. A linear one-compartment model with time- and dose-dependent relative bioavailability (F_rel) adequately described the pharmacokinetics of abemaciclib. Serum albumin and alkaline phosphatase were the only significant covariates identified in the model, the inclusion of which reduced inter-individual variability in F_rel by 10.3 percentage points. By combining the clinical popPK model with the previously developed pre-clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model, the extent of target engagement in skin in cancer patients was successfully predicted.

Conclusion

The proportion of abemaciclib pharmacokinetic variability that can be attributed to patient demographics is negligible, and as such there are currently no dose adjustments recommended for adult patients of different sex, age, or body weight.

Trial registration

NCT01394016 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40262-017-0559-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Revisiting mTOR inhibitors as anticancer agents

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a highly conserved serine/threonine kinase that regulates a variety of cellular processes, influencing diverse pathological conditions including a variety of cancers. Accordingly, therapies that target mTOR as anticancer agents benefit patients in various clinical settings. It is therefore important to fully investigate mTOR signaling at a molecular level and corresponding mTOR inhibitors to identify additional clinical opportunities of targeting mTOR in cancers. In this review, we introduce the function and regulation of the mTOR signaling pathway and organize and summarize the different roles of mTOR in cancers and a variety of mTOR inhibitors that can be used as anticancer agents. This article aims to enlighten and guide the development of mTOR-targeted anticancer agents in the future.

Mechanisms of therapeutic CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer

Cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have advanced the treatment of metastatic breast cancer by targeting the cell cycle machinery, interrupting intracellular and mitogenic hormone signals that stimulate proliferation of malignant cells. Preclinical evidence demonstrated that derangements of cyclin D1, CDK4/6, and retinoblastoma expression are common in breast cancer, and suggested a therapeutic benefit from interrupting this axis required for cell cycle progression. Studies of cell lines and animal models of breast cancer have demonstrated the complex interplay between the cell cycle and estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth receptor 2 signaling, which informs our understanding of synergistic use of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy, as well as mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy. Interestingly, estrogen receptor activity leads to upregulation of cyclin D1 expression, but the estrogen receptor is also in turn activated by cyclin D1, independent of estrogen binding. Early CDK inhibitors were nonspecific and limited by systemic toxicities, while the current generation of CDK4/6 inhibitors have shown promise in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Preclinical investigations of the three CDK4/6 inhibitors approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib) lend further insight into their mechanism of action, which will hopefully inform the future use and refinement of these therapies. Finally, we summarize evidence for additional novel CDK4/6 inhibitors currently in development.

CDK 4/6 Inhibitors as Single Agent in Advanced Solid Tumors

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, namely abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib, interfere with cell cycle progression, induce cell senescence and might promote cancer cell disruption by a cytotoxic T cells-mediated effect. Phase III randomized clinical trials have proven that CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with several endocrine agents improve treatment efficacy over endocrine agents alone for hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Based on such results, these combinations have been approved for clinical use. Preclinical studies in cell cultures and mouse models proved that CDK4/6i are active against a broad spectrum of solid tumors other than breast cancer, including liposarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, non-small cell lung cancer, glioblastoma multiforme, esophageal cancer, and melanoma. The role of CDK4/6i in monotherapy in several solid tumors is currently under evaluation in phase I, II, and III trials. Nowadays, abemaciclib is the only of the three inhibitors that has received approval as single agent therapy for pretreated HR+ HER2- MBC. Here we review biological, preclinical and clinical data on the role of CDK4/6 inhibitors as single agents in advanced solid tumors.

CDK4-6 inhibitors in breast cancer: current status and future development

INTRODUCTION

Aberrant cellular proliferation due to dysregulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) retinoblastoma (Rb)-pathway occurs in several cancers. Selective inhibition of CDK4/6 is an attractive target particularly in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), where it has transformed the treatment of these cancers in recent years. Three CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, have been approved for the treatment of HR+, HER2 negative (HER2-) MBC. Areas covered: We reviewed and compared the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and toxicity profiles of the three CDK4/6 inhibitors and discussed several challenges in the use of these drugs, particularly in identifying biomarkers, optimizing dosing strategies, and finding best combinations with other therapies. Expert opinion: All three CDK4/6 inhibitors have shown remarkable efficacy when added to endocrine therapy in the treatment of HR+/HER2- MBC with consistent improvements in progression-free survival across all phase III trials. As efficacy appears similar between the drugs, differences in toxicities, dosing schedule, and monitoring requirements may influence the choice of CDK4/6 inhibitor. There is a paucity of predictive biomarkers that have been identified thus far, but a few promising biomarkers have been studied in the preclinical setting and results of ongoing clinical studies are awaited to validate their utility.

Identification of Therapeutic Targets in Rhabdomyosarcoma through Integrated Genomic, Epigenomic, and Proteomic Analyses

Personalized cancer therapy targeting somatic mutations in patient tumors is increasingly being incorporated into practice. Other therapeutic vulnerabilities resulting from changes in gene expression due to tumor specific epigenetic perturbations are progressively being recognized. These genomic and epigenomic changes are ultimately manifest in the tumor proteome and phosphoproteome. We integrated transcriptomic, epigenomic, and proteomic/phosphoproteomic data to elucidate the cellular origins and therapeutic vulnerabilities of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). We discovered that alveolar RMS occurs further along the developmental program than embryonal RMS. We also identified deregulation of the RAS/MEK/ERK/CDK4/6, G2/M, and unfolded protein response pathways through our integrated analysis. Comprehensive preclinical testing revealed that targeting the WEE1 kinase in the G2/M pathway is the most effective approach in vivo for high-risk RMS.