1
|
Iacovacci J, Brough R, Moughari FA, Alexander J, Kemp H, Tutt ANJ, Natrajan R, Lord CJ, Haider S. Proteogenomic discovery of RB1-defective phenocopy in cancer predicts disease outcome, response to treatment, and therapeutic targets. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2025; 11:eadq9495. [PMID: 40138429 PMCID: PMC11939072 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adq9495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025]
Abstract
Genomic defects caused by truncating mutations or deletions in the Retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene (RB1) are frequently observed in many cancer types leading to dysregulation of the RB pathway. Here, we propose an integrative proteogenomic approach that predicts cancers with dysregulation in the RB pathway. A subset of these cancers, which we term as "RBness," lack RB1 genomic defects and yet phenocopy the transcriptional profile of RB1-defective cancers. We report RBness as a pan-cancer phenomenon, associated with patient outcome and chemotherapy response in multiple cancer types, and predictive of CDK4/6 inhibitor response in estrogen-positive breast cancer. Using RNA interference and a CRISPR-Cas9 screen in isogenic models, we find that RBness cancers also phenocopy synthetic lethal vulnerabilities of cells with RB1 genomic defects. In summary, our findings suggest that dysregulation of the RB pathway in cancers lacking RB1 genomic defects provides a molecular rationale for how these cancers could be treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Iacovacci
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
- Data Science Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy
| | - Rachel Brough
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
- CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Fatemeh Ahmadi Moughari
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - John Alexander
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Harriet Kemp
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Andrew N. J. Tutt
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Rachael Natrajan
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Christopher J. Lord
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
- CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Syed Haider
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Serbes ED, Horeweg N, Parra-Herran C, van Rijnsoever R, Jobsen JJ, Jurgenliemk-Schulz I, Kuijsters N, Nout RA, Haverkort MAD, Powell ME, Khaw P, Plante M, Genestie C, Nijman HW, Creutzberg CL, Bosse T, Kramer CJH. Retinoblastoma Protein Loss in p53 Abnormal Endometrial Carcinoma: Histologic and Clinicopathological Correlates. Mod Pathol 2025; 38:100660. [PMID: 39577664 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Revised: 11/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/24/2024]
Abstract
Of the 4 molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer (EC), p53-abnormal (p53abn) EC is associated with abundant copy number alterations and the worst clinical outcome. Patients with p53abn EC have the highest risk of disease recurrence and death, independent of tumor grade and histologic subtype. Currently, all invasive p53abn ECs are considered high risk, and no prognostic biomarkers have yet been found that can aid in clinical management. Here, we aimed to test whether loss of retinoblastoma (RB) protein expression using immunohistochemistry has the potential for prognostic refinement of p53abn EC. A large cohort of 227 p53abn ECs collected from the PORTEC-1/2/3 clinical trials and the Medisch Spectrum Twente cohort study was investigated, and RB loss was identified in 7.0% (n = 16/227). RB-lost p53abn ECs were predominantly high-grade endometrioid ECs (n = 6, 37.5%) and carcinosarcomas with endometrioid-type epithelial component (n = 5, 31.3%). Histologically, RB-lost p53abn ECs were typified by high-grade nuclear atypia (n = 16, 100%), predominantly solid growth pattern (n = 15/16, 93.8%), and polypoid growth (n = 9/16, 56.3%). Copy number loss involving the RB1 locus was identified in the majority of RB-lost p53abn EC (n = 13/14, 92.9%), explaining the loss of RB expression. Comparative analysis also showed that RB-lost p53abn ECs were diagnosed at earlier stages than RB-retained p53abn EC (P = .014). Interestingly, RB-lost p53abn EC showed prolonged time to overall recurrence (P = .038), even within stage I alone (P = .040). These findings highlight distinct morphomolecular features in RB-lost p53abn ECs and confirm the utility of RB immunohistochemistry as a surrogate for underlying molecular RB1 alterations. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show the potential use of RB in prognostic refinement of p53abn EC, although validation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ezgi Dicle Serbes
- Department of Pathology, Van Research and Training Hospital, Van, Turkiye
| | - Nanda Horeweg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos Parra-Herran
- Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Jan J Jobsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Ina Jurgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke Kuijsters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastro Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marie A D Haverkort
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapiegroep, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Melanie E Powell
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pearly Khaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marie Plante
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Catherine Genestie
- Department of Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Île-de-France, France
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Claire J H Kramer
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu Y, Zhang Q, Jiang W, Gao Y, Qu B, Wang X. CT-based radiomics predicts HRD score and HRD status in patients with ovarian cancer. Front Oncol 2025; 14:1477759. [PMID: 39845327 PMCID: PMC11750671 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1477759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2024] [Accepted: 12/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study predicted HRD score and status based on intra- and peritumoral radiomics in patients with ovarian cancer (OC) for better guiding the use of PARPi in clinical. Methods A total of 106 and 95 patients with OC were included between January 2022 and November 2023 for predicting HRD score and status, respectively. Radiomics features were extracted and quantitatively analyzed from intra- and peri-tumor regions in the CT image. Radiomics signatures (RSs) were built based on features from intra- and peri-tumor regions for predicting HRD score and status alone or in combination. Subject working characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity (SEN), and specificity (SPE) were calculated as comparative metrics. Results For predicting HRD score, 4 and 2 features were selected as the most important predictors from the intra- and peritumoral regions, respectively. For predicting HRD status, 4 features from the intratumoral region and 2 from the peritumoral region were identified as the most important predictors. Radiomics nomograms created by combining RSs and important clinical factors showed good predictive results with AUCs of 0.852 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.765-0.938, SEN = 0.907, SPE = 0.655) and 0.781 (95% CI: 0.621-0.941, SEN = 0.688, SPE = 0.833) in the training and validation cohort for predicting HRD score, respectively; with AUCs of 0.874 (95% CI: 0.790-0.957, SEN = 0.765, SPE = 0.867) and 0.824 (95% CI: 0.663-0.985, SEN = 0.762, SPE = 0.800) in the training and validation cohort for predicting HRD status, respectively. Discussion Calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed potential clinical usefulness of our nomograms. Our findings suggest that radiomics features derived from the CT image of OC have the potential to predict HRD score and status, and the developed nomograms can enrich the range of applicable population of PARPi, prolong progression-free survival and provide personalized treatment for OC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujiao Wu
- School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Liaoning, China
| | - Qianhui Zhang
- School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Liaoning, China
| | - Wenyan Jiang
- Department of Scientific Research and Academic, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Yuhua Gao
- Department of Gynecology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Bin Qu
- School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Liaoning, China
| | - Xingling Wang
- Department of Gynecology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barnicle A, Ray-Coquard I, Rouleau E, Cadoo K, Simpkins F, Aghajanian C, Leary A, Poveda A, Lheureux S, Pujade-Lauraine E, You B, Ledermann J, Matulonis U, Gourley C, Timms KM, Lai Z, Hodgson DR, Elks CE, Dearden S, Egile C, Lao-Sirieix P, Harrington EA, Brown JS. Patterns of genomic instability in > 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparib. Genome Med 2024; 16:145. [PMID: 39695768 PMCID: PMC11657106 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-024-01413-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors represented a paradigm shift in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Genomic data from patients with high-grade ovarian cancer in six phase II/III trials involving the PARP inhibitor olaparib were analyzed to better understand patterns and potential causes of genomic instability. PATIENTS AND METHODS Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) was assessed in 2147 tumor samples from SOLO1, PAOLA-1, Study 19, SOLO2, OPINION, and LIGHT using next-generation sequencing technology. Genomic instability scores (GIS) were assessed in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCA)-mutated (BRCAm), non-BRCA homologous recombination repair-mutated (non-BRCA HRRm), and non-HRRm tumors. RESULTS BRCAm was identified in 1021/2147 (47.6%) tumors. BRCAm tumors had significantly higher GIS than non-BRCAm tumors (P < 0.001) and high biallelic loss (815/838; 97.3%) regardless of germline (658/672; 97.9%) or somatic (101/108; 93.5%) BRCAm status. In non-BRCA HRRm tumors (n = 121) a similar proportion were HRD-positive (GIS ≥ 42: 55/121; 45.5%) relative to HRD-negative (GIS < 42: 52/121; 43.0%). GIS was highly variable in non-BRCA HRRm (median 42 [interquartile range (IQR) 29-58]) and non-HRRm (n = 1005; median 32 [IQR 20-55]) tumors. Gene mutations with high GIS included HRR genes BRIP1 (median 46 [IQR 41-58]), RAD51C (median 58 [IQR 48-66]), RAD51D (median 62 [IQR 54-69]), and PALB2 (median 64 [IQR 58-74]), and non-HRR genes NF1 (median 49 [IQR 25-60]) and RB1 (median 55 [IQR 30-71]). CCNE1-amplified and PIK3CA-mutated tumors had low GIS (CCNE1-amplified: median 24 [IQR 18-29]; PIK3CA-mutated: median 32 [IQR 14-52]) and were predominantly non-BRCAm. CONCLUSIONS These analyses provide valuable insight into patterns of genomic instability and potential drivers of HRD, besides BRCAm, in ovarian cancer and will help guide future research into the potential clinical effectiveness of anti-cancer treatments in ovarian cancer, including PARP inhibitors as well as other precision oncology agents. TRIAL REGISTRATION The SOLO1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01844986) on April 30, 2013; the PAOLA-1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02477644) on June 18, 2015 (retrospectively registered); Study 19 was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00753545) on September 12, 2008 (retrospectively registered); the SOLO2 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01874353) on June 7, 2013; the OPINION trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03402841) on January 3, 2018; the LIGHT trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02983799) on November 4, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Barnicle
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, 1 Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, UK.
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard and University Claude Bernard Lyon, and Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), Lyon, France
| | - Etienne Rouleau
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Karen Cadoo
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fiona Simpkins
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jordan Center for Gynecologic Oncology at the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Andrés Poveda
- Initia Oncology, Hospital Quironsalud, Valencia, Spain
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ONT, Canada
| | - Eric Pujade-Lauraine
- Association de Recherche Cancers Gynécologiques (ARCAGY)-GINECO, and GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Benoit You
- Medical Oncology, IC-HCL, EPSILYON, Univ Lyon 1, and GINECO, Lyon, France
| | - Jonathan Ledermann
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London and UCL Hospitals, London, UK
| | | | - Charlie Gourley
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Zhongwu Lai
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, Research and Early Development, AstraZeneca, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Darren R Hodgson
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, Research and Early Development, AstraZeneca, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cathy E Elks
- Precision Medicine and Biosamples, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Simon Dearden
- Precision Medicine and Biosamples, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Coumaran Egile
- Precision Medicine and Biosamples, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pierre Lao-Sirieix
- Precision Medicine and Biosamples, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Elizabeth A Harrington
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, 1 Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, UK
| | - Jessica S Brown
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, 1 Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haggstrom L, Lee YC, Scott C, Harter P, Woelber L, Ledermann J, Gourley C, McNeish IA, Amant F, Ray-Coquard I, Leary A, Oza AM, Tinker A, González Martin A, Cecere SC, Pignata S, Colombo N, Yoshida H, Marth C, Rosengarten O, Moore KN, Gómez-García EM, Tan D, Friedlander ML. How long is long enough? An international survey exploring practice variations on the recommended duration of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors in patients with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer and long-term outcomes. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:1932-1939. [PMID: 39438068 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There are no data, and thus no consensus, on the optimal duration of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy for exceptional responders (here defined as progression-free for 5 years or longer) with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The current licence is to continue PARP inhibitors until progression or toxicity; however, international practice varies considerably. The risks of late progression and late-onset myeloid malignancies, defined as occurring beyond 5 years of PARP inhibition, are unknown. This study aims to examine the practice patterns and opinions regarding the management and surveillance protocols of exceptional responders with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS An online international survey of experts from June 2023 to June 2024 was carried out, disseminated at Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup meetings and by Chairs of Cooperative Groups. RESULTS 210 responses were received from 26 countries including Australia (27 respondents), Germany (24), the UK (21), the Netherlands (16), France (13), Spain (12), Canada (12), Italy (11), Japan (11), and other countries (63). Most respondents did not have institutional or trials group guidelines regarding duration of PARP inhibitors (154, 73.3%). For the minority with guidelines, recommendations varied: 1 year (2), 2 years (13), 3 years (4), and indefinite treatment (22). Individual practice varied considerably for those without guidelines: most (116, 76.3%) recommended ≥5 years of PARP inhibition, of which 73 (48.0%) recommended indefinite PARP inhibition. Sixty-six respondents (31.4%) reported having patients with late progression and 46 (22.0%) had cases with late-onset myeloid malignancies. Surveillance practices varied widely across all respondents. CONCLUSIONS This international survey highlights the diverse practice variations and disparate views on the optimal duration of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors in platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The responses suggest a notable risk of late progression and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia among exceptional responders which needs confirmation. Detailed individual patient data is required to draw more reliable conclusions; another study is underway addressing this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Haggstrom
- Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yeh Chen Lee
- Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Clare Scott
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom, Essen, Germany
| | - Linn Woelber
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonathan Ledermann
- UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Iain A McNeish
- Imperial College London Department of Surgery and Cancer, London, UK
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Universite Claude Bernard Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Alexandra Leary
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Amit M Oza
- Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Tinker
- BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Antonio González Martin
- Grupo Español de Investigación en Cancer Ginecológico (GEICO), Madrid, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sabrina Chiara Cecere
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
- Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies, Naples, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
- Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Hiroyuki Yoshida
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University, Iruma-gun, Japan
- GOTIC - North Kanto Gynecologic Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium, Saitama, Japan
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ora Rosengarten
- Medical Gyneco-Oncology Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | - David Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore Centre for Cancer Research, Singapore
| | - Michael L Friedlander
- Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang Z, Lu Y, Han M, Li A, Ruan M, Tong Y, Yang C, Zhang X, Zhu C, Wang C, Shen K, Dong L, Chen X. Association between homologous recombination deficiency status and carboplatin treatment response in early triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 208:429-440. [PMID: 39048852 PMCID: PMC11457550 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07436-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status and its correlation with carboplatin treatment response in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. METHODS Tumor tissues from 225 consecutive TNBC patients were evaluated with an HRD panel and homologous recombination-related (HRR) gene expression data. HRD positivity was defined as a high HRD score and/or BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutation. Clinicopathological factors, neoadjuvant treatment response, and prognosis were analyzed with respect to HRD status in these TNBC patients. RESULTS HRD positivity was found in 53.3% of patients and was significantly related to high Ki67 levels (P = 0.001). In patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HRD positivity (P = 0.005) or a high HRD score (P = 0.003) was significantly associated with a greater pathological complete response (pCR) rate, especially in those treated with carboplatin-containing neoadjuvant regimens (HRD positivity vs. negativity: 50.00% vs. 17.65%, P = 0.040). HRD positivity was associated with favorable distant metastasis-free survival (hazard ratio HR 0.49, 95% confidence interval CI 0.26-0.90, P = 0.022) and overall survival (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-0.99, P = 0.049), irrespective of carboplatin treatment. CONCLUSION TNBC patients with high HRDs had high Ki67 levels and BRCA mutations. HRD-positive TNBC patients treated with carboplatin had a higher pCR rate. Patients with HRD positivity had a better prognosis, irrespective of carboplatin treatment, warranting further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Yujie Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Mengyuan Han
- Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Anqi Li
- Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Miao Ruan
- Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Yiwei Tong
- Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Cuiyan Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Xiaotian Zhang
- Department of Translational Oncology, Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd., Xiamen, 361026, China
| | - Changbin Zhu
- Department of Translational Oncology, Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd., Xiamen, 361026, China
| | - Chaofu Wang
- Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China.
| | - Kunwei Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China.
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China.
| | - Xiaosong Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miras I, Estévez-García P, Muñoz-Galván S. Clinical and molecular features of platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 201:104434. [PMID: 38960218 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal of all the gynecological tumors despite remarkable advances in our understanding of its molecular biology. The cornerstone treatment remains cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. Recently, the addition of targeted therapies, such as PARP inhibitors, as first-line maintenance has led to outstanding improvements, mainly in BRCA mutated and homologous recombination deficient tumors. However, a significant proportion of patients will experience recurrence, primarily due to platinum resistance, which ultimately result in fatality. Among these patients, primary platinum-resistant have a particularly dismal prognosis due to their low response to current available therapies, historical exclusion from clinical trials, and the absence of validated biomarkers. In this review, we discuss the concept of platinum resistance in ovarian cancer, the clinical and molecular characteristics of this resistance, and the current and new treatment options for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Miras
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBIS, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Universidad de Sevilla, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Seville, Spain; Medical Oncology Department. Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Purificación Estévez-García
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBIS, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Universidad de Sevilla, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Seville, Spain; Medical Oncology Department. Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain; CIBER de CANCER, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sandra Muñoz-Galván
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBIS, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Universidad de Sevilla, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Seville, Spain; CIBER de CANCER, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Saner FA, Takahashi K, Budden T, Pandey A, Ariyaratne D, Zwimpfer TA, Meagher NS, Fereday S, Twomey L, Pishas KI, Hoang T, Bolithon A, Traficante N, Alsop K, Christie EL, Kang EY, Nelson GS, Ghatage P, Lee CH, Riggan MJ, Alsop J, Beckmann MW, Boros J, Brand AH, Brooks-Wilson A, Carney ME, Coulson P, Courtney-Brooks M, Cushing-Haugen KL, Cybulski C, El-Bahrawy MA, Elishaev E, Erber R, Gayther SA, Gentry-Maharaj A, Gilks CB, Harnett PR, Harris HR, Hartmann A, Hein A, Hendley J, Hernandez BY, Jakubowska A, Jimenez-Linan M, Jones ME, Kaufmann SH, Kennedy CJ, Kluz T, Koziak JM, Kristjansdottir B, Le ND, Lener M, Lester J, Lubiński J, Mateoiu C, Orsulic S, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Shah M, Sharma R, Sherman ME, Shvetsov YB, Soong TR, Steed H, Sukumvanich P, Talhouk A, Taylor SE, Vierkant RA, Wang C, Widschwendter M, Wilkens LR, Winham SJ, Anglesio MS, Berchuck A, Brenton JD, Campbell I, Cook LS, Doherty JA, Fasching PA, Fortner RT, Goodman MT, Gronwald J, Huntsman DG, Karlan BY, Kelemen LE, Menon U, Modugno F, Pharoah PD, Schildkraut JM, Sundfeldt K, Swerdlow AJ, Goode EL, DeFazio A, Köbel M, Ramus SJ, Bowtell DD, Garsed DW. Concurrent RB1 Loss and BRCA Deficiency Predicts Enhanced Immunologic Response and Long-term Survival in Tubo-ovarian High-grade Serous Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:3481-3498. [PMID: 38837893 PMCID: PMC11325151 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate RB1 expression and survival across ovarian carcinoma histotypes and how co-occurrence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alterations and RB1 loss influences survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN RB1 protein expression was classified by immunohistochemistry in ovarian carcinomas of 7,436 patients from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We examined RB1 expression and germline BRCA status in a subset of 1,134 HGSC, and related genotype to overall survival (OS), tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes, and transcriptomic subtypes. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we deleted RB1 in HGSC cells with and without BRCA1 alterations to model co-loss with treatment response. We performed whole-genome and transcriptome data analyses on 126 patients with primary HGSC to characterize tumors with concurrent BRCA deficiency and RB1 loss. RESULTS RB1 loss was associated with longer OS in HGSC but with poorer prognosis in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Patients with HGSC harboring both RB1 loss and pathogenic germline BRCA variants had superior OS compared with patients with either alteration alone, and their median OS was three times longer than those without pathogenic BRCA variants and retained RB1 expression (9.3 vs. 3.1 years). Enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin and paclitaxel was seen in BRCA1-altered cells with RB1 knockout. Combined RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency correlated with transcriptional markers of enhanced IFN response, cell-cycle deregulation, and reduced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. CD8+ lymphocytes were most prevalent in BRCA-deficient HGSC with co-loss of RB1. CONCLUSIONS Co-occurrence of RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency was associated with exceptionally long survival in patients with HGSC, potentially due to better treatment response and immune stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flurina A.M. Saner
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Kazuaki Takahashi
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Timothy Budden
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Skin Cancer and Ageing Lab, Cancer Research United Kingdom Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Ahwan Pandey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | | | - Nicola S. Meagher
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Laura Twomey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Kathleen I. Pishas
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Therese Hoang
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Adelyn Bolithon
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | | | - Kathryn Alsop
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Elizabeth L. Christie
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Eun-Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Gregg S. Nelson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - Marjorie J. Riggan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Jessica Boros
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Alison H. Brand
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | | | - Michael E. Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii.
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Madeleine Courtney-Brooks
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Kara L. Cushing-Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Mona A. El-Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Simon A. Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
- Department of Women’s Cancer, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - C. Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Paul R. Harnett
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Holly R. Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
| | | | - Michael E. Jones
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Scott H. Kaufmann
- Division of Oncology Research, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Catherine J. Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecology Oncology and Obstetrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszów, Poland.
| | | | - Björg Kristjansdottir
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Nhu D. Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Marcin Lener
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Jenny Lester
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
| | | | - Sandra Orsulic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Minouk J. Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Mitul Shah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Mark E. Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | - Yurii B. Shvetsov
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - T. Rinda Soong
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, North Zone, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - Paniti Sukumvanich
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Aline Talhouk
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Sarah E. Taylor
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Robert A. Vierkant
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Chen Wang
- Division of Computational Biology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | | | - Lynne R. Wilkens
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Stacey J. Winham
- Division of Computational Biology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - James D. Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Linda S. Cook
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Jennifer A. Doherty
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Renée T. Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Marc T. Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - David G. Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Beth Y. Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Linda E. Kelemen
- Division of Acute Disease Epidemiology, South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control, Columbia, South Carolina.
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
- Women’s Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, California.
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Joellen M. Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Anthony J. Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - David D.L. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Dale W. Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stiegeler N, Garsed DW, Au-Yeung G, Bowtell DDL, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Zwimpfer TA. Homologous recombination proficient subtypes of high-grade serous ovarian cancer: treatment options for a poor prognosis group. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1387281. [PMID: 38894867 PMCID: PMC11183307 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1387281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Approximately 50% of tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) have functional homologous recombination-mediated (HR) DNA repair, so-called HR-proficient tumors, which are often associated with primary platinum resistance (relapse within six months after completion of first-line therapy), minimal benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and shorter survival. HR-proficient tumors comprise multiple molecular subtypes including cases with CCNE1 amplification, AKT2 amplification or CDK12 alteration, and are often characterized as "cold" tumors with fewer infiltrating lymphocytes and decreased expression of PD-1/PD-L1. Several new treatment approaches aim to manipulate these negative prognostic features and render HR-proficient tumors more susceptible to treatment. Alterations in multiple different molecules and pathways in the DNA damage response are driving new drug development to target HR-proficient cancer cells, such as inhibitors of the CDK or P13K/AKT pathways, as well as ATR inhibitors. Treatment combinations with chemotherapy or PARP inhibitors and agents targeting DNA replication stress have shown promising preclinical and clinical results. New approaches in immunotherapy are also being explored, including vaccines or antibody drug conjugates. Many approaches are still in the early stages of development and further clinical trials will determine their clinical relevance. There is a need to include HR-proficient tumors in ovarian cancer trials and to analyze them in a more targeted manner to provide further evidence for their specific therapy, as this will be crucial in improving the overall prognosis of HGSC and ovarian cancer in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dale W. Garsed
- Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - George Au-Yeung
- Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David D. L. Bowtell
- Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Tibor A. Zwimpfer
- Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ho GY, Vandenberg CJ, Lim R, Christie EL, Garsed DW, Lieschke E, Nesic K, Kondrashova O, Ratnayake G, Radke M, Penington JS, Carmagnac A, Heong V, Kyran EL, Zhang F, Traficante N, Huang R, Dobrovic A, Swisher EM, McNally O, Kee D, Wakefield MJ, Papenfuss AT, Bowtell DDL, Barker HE, Scott CL. The microtubule inhibitor eribulin demonstrates efficacy in platinum-resistant and refractory high-grade serous ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft models. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231208674. [PMID: 38028140 PMCID: PMC10666702 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231208674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite initial response to platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitor therapy (PARPi), nearly all recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) will acquire lethal drug resistance; indeed, ~15% of individuals have de novo platinum-refractory disease. Objectives To determine the potential of anti-microtubule agent (AMA) therapy (paclitaxel, vinorelbine and eribulin) in platinum-resistant or refractory (PRR) HGSC by assessing response in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of HGSC. Design and methods Of 13 PRR HGSC PDX, six were primary PRR, derived from chemotherapy-naïve samples (one was BRCA2 mutant) and seven were from samples obtained following chemotherapy treatment in the clinic (five were mutant for either BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2), four with prior PARPi exposure), recapitulating the population of individuals with aggressive treatment-resistant HGSC in the clinic. Molecular analyses and in vivo treatment studies were undertaken. Results Seven out of thirteen PRR PDX (54%) were sensitive to treatment with the AMA, eribulin (time to progressive disease (PD) ⩾100 days from the start of treatment) and 11 out of 13 PDX (85%) derived significant benefit from eribulin [time to harvest (TTH) for each PDX with p < 0.002]. In 5 out of 10 platinum-refractory HGSC PDX (50%) and one out of three platinum-resistant PDX (33%), eribulin was more efficacious than was cisplatin, with longer time to PD and significantly extended TTH (each PDX p < 0.02). Furthermore, four of these models were extremely sensitive to all three AMA tested, maintaining response until the end of the experiment (120d post-treatment start). Despite harbouring secondary BRCA2 mutations, two BRCA2-mutant PDX models derived from heavily pre-treated individuals were sensitive to AMA. PRR HGSC PDX models showing greater sensitivity to AMA had high proliferative indices and oncogene expression. Two PDX models, both with prior chemotherapy and/or PARPi exposure, were refractory to all AMA, one of which harboured the SLC25A40-ABCB1 fusion, known to upregulate drug efflux via MDR1. Conclusion The efficacy observed for eribulin in PRR HGSC PDX was similar to that observed for paclitaxel, which transformed ovarian cancer clinical practice. Eribulin is therefore worthy of further consideration in clinical trials, particularly in ovarian carcinoma with early failure of carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwo Yaw Ho
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- The Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
| | - Cassandra J. Vandenberg
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ratana Lim
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth L. Christie
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Dale W. Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Lieschke
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ksenija Nesic
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Olga Kondrashova
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Marc Radke
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jocelyn S. Penington
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Amandine Carmagnac
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Valerie Heong
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth L. Kyran
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Fan Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Alexander Dobrovic
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Orla McNally
- The Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Damien Kee
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew J. Wakefield
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Anthony T. Papenfuss
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - David D. L. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Holly E. Barker
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Clare L. Scott
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- The Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Saner FAM, Takahashi K, Budden T, Pandey A, Ariyaratne D, Zwimpfer TA, Meagher NS, Fereday S, Twomey L, Pishas KI, Hoang T, Bolithon A, Traficante N, Alsop K, Christie EL, Kang EY, Nelson GS, Ghatage P, Lee CH, Riggan MJ, Alsop J, Beckmann MW, Boros J, Brand AH, Brooks-Wilson A, Carney ME, Coulson P, Courtney-Brooks M, Cushing-Haugen KL, Cybulski C, El-Bahrawy MA, Elishaev E, Erber R, Gayther SA, Gentry-Maharaj A, Blake Gilks C, Harnett PR, Harris HR, Hartmann A, Hein A, Hendley J, Hernandez BY, Jakubowska A, Jimenez-Linan M, Jones ME, Kaufmann SH, Kennedy CJ, Kluz T, Koziak JM, Kristjansdottir B, Le ND, Lener M, Lester J, Lubiński J, Mateoiu C, Orsulic S, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Shah M, Sharma R, Sherman ME, Shvetsov YB, Singh N, Rinda Soong T, Steed H, Sukumvanich P, Talhouk A, Taylor SE, Vierkant RA, Wang C, Widschwendter M, Wilkens LR, Winham SJ, Anglesio MS, Berchuck A, Brenton JD, Campbell I, Cook LS, Doherty JA, Fasching PA, Fortner RT, Goodman MT, Gronwald J, Huntsman DG, Karlan BY, Kelemen LE, Menon U, Modugno F, Pharoah PD, Schildkraut JM, Sundfeldt K, Swerdlow AJ, Goode EL, DeFazio A, Köbel M, Ramus SJ, Bowtell DDL, Garsed DW. Concurrent RB1 loss and BRCA-deficiency predicts enhanced immunological response and long-term survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.11.09.23298321. [PMID: 37986741 PMCID: PMC10659507 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.09.23298321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Somatic loss of the tumour suppressor RB1 is a common event in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), which frequently co-occurs with alterations in homologous recombination DNA repair genes including BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA). We examined whether tumour expression of RB1 was associated with survival across ovarian cancer histotypes (HGSC, endometrioid (ENOC), clear cell (CCOC), mucinous (MOC), low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC)), and how co-occurrence of germline BRCA pathogenic variants and RB1 loss influences long-term survival in a large series of HGSC. Patients and methods RB1 protein expression patterns were classified by immunohistochemistry in epithelial ovarian carcinomas of 7436 patients from 20 studies participating in the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium and assessed for associations with overall survival (OS), accounting for patient age at diagnosis and FIGO stage. We examined RB1 expression and germline BRCA status in a subset of 1134 HGSC, and related genotype to survival, tumour infiltrating CD8+ lymphocyte counts and transcriptomic subtypes. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we deleted RB1 in HGSC cell lines with and without BRCA1 mutations to model co-loss with treatment response. We also performed genomic analyses on 126 primary HGSC to explore the molecular characteristics of concurrent homologous recombination deficiency and RB1 loss. Results RB1 protein loss was most frequent in HGSC (16.4%) and was highly correlated with RB1 mRNA expression. RB1 loss was associated with longer OS in HGSC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.83, P = 6.8 ×10-7), but with poorer prognosis in ENOC (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.17-4.03, P = 0.0140). Germline BRCA mutations and RB1 loss co-occurred in HGSC (P < 0.0001). Patients with both RB1 loss and germline BRCA mutations had a superior OS (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25-0.58, P = 5.2 ×10-6) compared to patients with either alteration alone, and their median OS was three times longer than non-carriers whose tumours retained RB1 expression (9.3 years vs. 3.1 years). Enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin (P < 0.01) and paclitaxel (P < 0.05) was seen in BRCA1 mutated cell lines with RB1 knockout. Among 126 patients with whole-genome and transcriptome sequence data, combined RB1 loss and genomic evidence of homologous recombination deficiency was correlated with transcriptional markers of enhanced interferon response, cell cycle deregulation, and reduced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in primary HGSC. CD8+ lymphocytes were most prevalent in BRCA-deficient HGSC with co-loss of RB1. Conclusions Co-occurrence of RB1 loss and BRCA mutation was associated with exceptionally long survival in patients with HGSC, potentially due to better treatment response and immune stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flurina A. M. Saner
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kazuaki Takahashi
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Timothy Budden
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Skin Cancer and Ageing Lab, Cancer Research United Kingdom Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ahwan Pandey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Nicola S. Meagher
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laura Twomey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kathleen I. Pishas
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Therese Hoang
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adelyn Bolithon
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kathryn Alsop
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth L. Christie
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eun-Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Gregg S. Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Marjorie J. Riggan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jessica Boros
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alison H. Brand
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Michael E. Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Madeleine Courtney-Brooks
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kara L. Cushing-Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Mona A. El-Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Simon A. Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Women’s Cancer, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - C. Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Paul R. Harnett
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Holly R. Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - AOCS Group
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Michael E. Jones
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Scott H. Kaufmann
- Division of Oncology Research, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Catherine J. Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecology Oncology and Obstetrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszów, Poland
| | | | - Björg Kristjansdottir
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nhu D. Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Marcin Lener
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Sandra Orsulic
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Minouk J. Schoemaker
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark E. Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - T. Rinda Soong
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, North Zone, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Paniti Sukumvanich
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aline Talhouk
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sarah E. Taylor
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Robert A. Vierkant
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Stacey J. Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - James D. Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Linda S. Cook
- Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer A. Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Renée T. Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marc T. Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - David G. Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Beth Y. Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Linda E. Kelemen
- Division of Acute Disease Epidemiology, South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Women’s Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, USA
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joellen M. Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anthony J. Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David D. L. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dale W. Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Köbel M, Yang RZ, Kang EY, Al-Shamma Z, Cook LS, Kinloch M, Carey MS, Hopkins L, Nelson GS, McManus KJ, Vizeacoumar FS, Vizeacoumar FJ, Freywald A, Fu Y, Reuss DE, Lee CH. Survey of NF1 inactivation by surrogate immunohistochemistry in ovarian carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 178:80-88. [PMID: 37820398 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Inhibition of the MAPK pathway by MEK inhibitors (MEKi) is currently a therapeutic standard in several cancer types, including ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). A common MAPK pathway alteration in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the genomic inactivation of neurofibromin 1 (NF1). The primary objectives of our study were to survey the prevalence of NF1 inactivation in the principal ovarian carcinoma histotype as well as to evaluate its associations with clinico-pathological parameters and key biomarkers including BRCA1/2 status in HGSC. METHODS A recently commercialized NF1 antibody (clone NFC) was orthogonally validated on an automated immunohistochemistry (IHC) platform and IHC was performed on tissue microarrays containing 2140 ovarian carcinoma cases. Expression was interpreted as loss/inactivated (complete or subclonal) versus normal/retained. RESULTS Loss of NF1 expression was detected in 250/1429 (17.4%) HGSC including 11% with subclonal loss. Survival of NF1-inactivated HGSC patients was intermediate between favorable BRCA1/2 mutated HGSC and unfavorable CCNE1 high-level amplified HGSC. NF1 inactivation was mutually exclusive with CCNE1 high-level amplifications, co-occurred with RB1 loss and occurred at similar frequencies in BRCA1/2 mutated versus wild-type HGSC. NF1 loss was found in 21/286 (7.3%) endometrioid carcinomas with a favorable prognostic association (p = 0.048), and in 4/64 (5.9%) LGSC, mutually exclusive with other driver events. CONCLUSIONS NF1 inactivation occurs in a significant subset of BRCA1/2 wild-type HGSC and a subset of LGSC. While the functional effects of NF1 inactivation need to be further characterized, this signifies a potential therapeutic opportunity to explore targeting NF1 inactivation in these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Rui Zhe Yang
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Eun Young Kang
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Zainab Al-Shamma
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Linda S Cook
- Department of CSPH-Epidemiology, University of Colorado-Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Mary Kinloch
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Mark S Carey
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Laura Hopkins
- Division of Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada; Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Kirk J McManus
- Department of Biochemistry & Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute CancerCare, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Frederick S Vizeacoumar
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Franco J Vizeacoumar
- Division of Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada; Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Andrew Freywald
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - YangXin Fu
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - David E Reuss
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Benada J, Bulanova D, Azzoni V, Petrosius V, Ghazanfar S, Wennerberg K, Sørensen C. Synthetic lethal interaction between WEE1 and PKMYT1 is a target for multiple low-dose treatment of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. NAR Cancer 2023; 5:zcad029. [PMID: 37325550 PMCID: PMC10262308 DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcad029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is driven by genetic alterations that necessitate protective DNA damage and replication stress responses through cell cycle control and genome maintenance. This creates specific vulnerabilities that may be exploited therapeutically. WEE1 kinase is a key cell cycle control kinase, and it has emerged as a promising cancer therapy target. However, adverse effects have limited its clinical progress, especially when tested in combination with chemotherapies. A strong genetic interaction between WEE1 and PKMYT1 led us to hypothesize that a multiple low-dose approach utilizing joint WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibition would allow exploitation of the synthetic lethality. We found that the combination of WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibition exhibited synergistic effects in eradicating ovarian cancer cells and organoid models at a low dose. The WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibition synergistically promoted CDK activation. Furthermore, the combined treatment exacerbated DNA replication stress and replication catastrophe, leading to increase of the genomic instability and inflammatory STAT1 signalling activation. These findings suggest a new multiple low-dose approach to harness the potency of WEE1 inhibition through the synthetic lethal interaction with PKMYT1 that may contribute to the development of new treatments for ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Benada
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Daria Bulanova
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Violette Azzoni
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Valdemaras Petrosius
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
- Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads 224, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Saba Ghazanfar
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Krister Wennerberg
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Claus Storgaard Sørensen
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
A novel defined risk signature of endoplasmic reticulum stress-related genes for predicting the prognosis and immune infiltration status of ovarian cancer. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2023; 24:64-77. [PMID: 36632751 PMCID: PMC9837372 DOI: 10.1631/jzus.b2200272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, as an emerging hallmark feature of cancer, has a considerable impact on cell proliferation, metastasis, invasion, and chemotherapy resistance. Ovarian cancer (OvCa) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality across the world due to the late stage of disease at diagnosis. Studies have explored the influence of ER stress on OvCa in recent years, while the predictive role of ER stress-related genes in OvCa prognosis remains unexplored. Here, we enrolled 552 cases of ER stress-related genes involved in OvCa from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) cohorts for the screening of prognosis-related genes. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was applied to establish an ER stress-related risk signature based on the TCGA cohort. A seven-gene signature revealed a favorable predictive efficacy for the TCGA, International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC), and another GEO cohort (P<0.001, P<0.001, and P=0.04, respectively). Moreover, functional annotation indicated that this signature was enriched in cellular response and senescence, cytokines interaction, as well as multiple immune-associated terms. The immune infiltration profiles further delineated an immunologic unresponsive status in the high-risk group. In conclusion, ER stress-related genes are vital factors predicting the prognosis of OvCa, and possess great application potential in the clinic.
Collapse
|
15
|
Garsed DW, Pandey A, Fereday S, Kennedy CJ, Takahashi K, Alsop K, Hamilton PT, Hendley J, Chiew YE, Traficante N, Provan P, Ariyaratne D, Au-Yeung G, Bateman NW, Bowes L, Brand A, Christie EL, Cunningham JM, Friedlander M, Grout B, Harnett P, Hung J, McCauley B, McNally O, Piskorz AM, Saner FAM, Vierkant RA, Wang C, Winham SJ, Pharoah PDP, Brenton JD, Conrads TP, Maxwell GL, Ramus SJ, Pearce CL, Pike MC, Nelson BH, Goode EL, DeFazio A, Bowtell DDL. The genomic and immune landscape of long-term survivors of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat Genet 2022; 54:1853-1864. [PMID: 36456881 PMCID: PMC10478425 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-022-01230-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Fewer than half of all patients with advanced-stage high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSCs) survive more than five years after diagnosis, but those who have an exceptionally long survival could provide insights into tumor biology and therapeutic approaches. We analyzed 60 patients with advanced-stage HGSC who survived more than 10 years after diagnosis using whole-genome sequencing, transcriptome and methylome profiling of their primary tumor samples, comparing this data to 66 short- or moderate-term survivors. Tumors of long-term survivors were more likely to have multiple alterations in genes associated with DNA repair and more frequent somatic variants resulting in an increased predicted neoantigen load. Patients clustered into survival groups based on genomic and immune cell signatures, including three subsets of patients with BRCA1 alterations with distinctly different outcomes. Specific combinations of germline and somatic gene alterations, tumor cell phenotypes and differential immune responses appear to contribute to long-term survival in HGSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dale W Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Ahwan Pandey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kazuaki Takahashi
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kathryn Alsop
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Phineas T Hamilton
- The Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yoke-Eng Chiew
- The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Pamela Provan
- The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - George Au-Yeung
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicholas W Bateman
- Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Leanne Bowes
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Brand
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth L Christie
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie M Cunningham
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael Friedlander
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Paul Harnett
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jillian Hung
- The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bryan McCauley
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Orla McNally
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna M Piskorz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Flurina A M Saner
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Robert A Vierkant
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chen Wang
- Division of Computational Biology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Division of Computational Biology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas P Conrads
- Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - George L Maxwell
- Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Celeste Leigh Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology and Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Malcolm C Pike
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brad H Nelson
- The Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Division of Epidemology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David D L Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
O'Malley DM, Oza AM, Lorusso D, Aghajanian C, Oaknin A, Dean A, Colombo N, Weberpals JI, Clamp AR, Scambia G, Leary A, Holloway RW, Gancedo MA, Fong PC, Goh JC, Swisher EM, Maloney L, Goble S, Lin KK, Kwan T, Ledermann JA, Coleman RL. Clinical and molecular characteristics of ARIEL3 patients who derived exceptional benefit from rucaparib maintenance treatment for high-grade ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:404-413. [PMID: 36273926 PMCID: PMC10339359 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE ARIEL3 (NCT01968213) is a placebo-controlled randomized trial of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rucaparib as maintenance treatment in patients with recurrent high-grade ovarian carcinoma who responded to their latest line of platinum therapy. Rucaparib improved progression-free survival across all predefined subgroups. Here, we present an exploratory analysis of clinical and molecular characteristics associated with exceptional benefit from rucaparib. METHODS Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive rucaparib 600 mg twice daily or placebo. Molecular features (genomic alterations, BRCA1 promoter methylation) and baseline clinical characteristics were evaluated for association with exceptional benefit (progression-free survival ≥2 years) versus progression on first scan (short-term subgroup) and other efficacy outcomes. RESULTS Rucaparib treatment was significantly associated with exceptional benefit compared with placebo: 79/375 (21.1%) vs 4/189 (2.1%), respectively (p < 0.0001). Exceptional benefit was more frequent among patients with favorable baseline clinical characteristics and with carcinomas harboring molecular evidence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). A comparison between patients who derived exceptional benefit from rucaparib and those in the short-term subgroup revealed both clinical markers (no measurable disease at baseline, complete response to latest platinum, longer penultimate platinum-free interval) and molecular markers (BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, and RAD51D alterations and genome-wide loss of heterozygosity) significantly associated with exceptional benefit. CONCLUSIONS Exceptional benefit in ARIEL3 was more common in, but not exclusive to, patients with favorable clinical characteristics or molecular features associated with HRD. Our results suggest that rucaparib can deliver exceptional benefit to a diverse set of patients with recurrent high-grade ovarian carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA. David.O'
| | - Amit M Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Carol Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ana Oaknin
- Gynecologic Cancer Program, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrew Dean
- Department of Medical Oncology, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subaico, WA, Australia
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Milan-Bicocca and European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Johanne I Weberpals
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew R Clamp
- Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Cancer Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS and Scientific Directorate, Rome, Italy
| | - Alexandra Leary
- Gynecological Unit, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, INSERM U981, Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), Villejuif, France
| | - Robert W Holloway
- Gynecologic Oncology, Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | - Peter C Fong
- Medical Oncology, Auckland City Hospital and University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jeffrey C Goh
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Elizabeth M Swisher
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lara Maloney
- Clinical Development, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Sandra Goble
- Biostatistics, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Kevin K Lin
- Molecular Diagnostics, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Tanya Kwan
- Molecular Diagnostics, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Jonathan A Ledermann
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London and UCL Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Punzón-Jiménez P, Lago V, Domingo S, Simón C, Mas A. Molecular Management of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:13777. [PMID: 36430255 PMCID: PMC9692799 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232213777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) represents the most common form of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The absence of specific symptoms leads to late-stage diagnosis, making HGSOC one of the gynecological cancers with the worst prognosis. The cellular origin of HGSOC and the role of reproductive hormones, genetic traits (such as alterations in P53 and DNA-repair mechanisms), chromosomal instability, or dysregulation of crucial signaling pathways have been considered when evaluating prognosis and response to therapy in HGSOC patients. However, the detection of HGSOC is still based on traditional methods such as carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) detection and ultrasound, and the combined use of these methods has yet to support significant reductions in overall mortality rates. The current paradigm for HGSOC management has moved towards early diagnosis via the non-invasive detection of molecular markers through liquid biopsies. This review presents an integrated view of the relevant cellular and molecular aspects involved in the etiopathogenesis of HGSOC and brings together studies that consider new horizons for the possible early detection of this gynecological cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Punzón-Jiménez
- Carlos Simon Foundation, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Victor Lago
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CEU Cardenal Herrera University, 46115 Valencia, Spain
| | - Santiago Domingo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Carlos Simón
- Carlos Simon Foundation, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, 46010 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Aymara Mas
- Carlos Simon Foundation, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Manganaro L, Celli V, Viggiani V, Berardelli E, Granato T, Tartaglione S, Farina A, Catalano C, Angeloni A, Anastasi E. CT imaging phenotypes linked to CA125 and HE4 biomarkers are highly predictive in discriminating between hereditary and sporadic ovarian cancer patients. Tumour Biol 2022; 44:171-185. [DOI: 10.3233/tub-211557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hereditary ovarian cancers (HOC) represent about 23% of ovarian cancer (OC) cases: they are most frequently related to germline mutations in the BRCA genes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare CA125/HE4 serum levels and Computed Tomography (CT) features at time of ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis in two populations: BRCA mutant and BRCA wild-type (WT) OC, and to investigate the relationship between this laboratory and radiological biomarker and BRCA mutation status. METHODS: This retrospective study included 60 newly diagnosed OC patients with FIGO stage IIIC-IV disease, tested for BRCA1/2 germline mutation status of which preoperative CT scan and serum tumor marker assay were available. RESULTS: The median level of CA125 (708 U/mL) was significantly higher (p < 0.002) in BRCA1/2 mutated patients than in WT patients (176 U/mL), whereas the median level of HE4 (492 pmol/L) was significantly higher (p < 0.002) in WT than in BRCA-mutated patients (252 pmol/L). BRCA mutation carriers showed a higher incidence of bilateral ovarian masses (p = 0.0303) characterized by solid structures (p < 0.00001), higher peritoneal tumor load, macronodular implants >2 cm (p = 0.000099), increased frequency of lymphadenopathies (p = 0.019), and metastasis (p = 0.052) compared to patients with BRCA WT. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor markers and CT patterns may help in identifying BRCA mutation status in OC directing patients towards a personalized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Manganaro
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Veronica Celli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Viggiani
- Department of Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Berardelli
- Department of Experimental Medicine “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Teresa Granato
- CNR-IBPM, National Research Council, Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Tartaglione
- Department of Experimental Medicine “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Farina
- Department of Experimental Medicine “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Catalano
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Angeloni
- Department of Experimental Medicine “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuela Anastasi
- Department of Experimental Medicine “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hollis RL, Meynert AM, Michie CO, Rye T, Churchman M, Hallas-Potts A, Croy I, McCluggage WG, Williams AR, Bartos C, Iida Y, Okamoto A, Dougherty B, Barrett JC, March R, Matakidou A, Roxburgh P, Semple CA, Harkin DP, Kennedy R, Herrington CS, Gourley C. Multiomic Characterization of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Enables High-Resolution Patient Stratification. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:3546-3556. [PMID: 35696721 PMCID: PMC9662902 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most common ovarian cancer type; most patients experience disease recurrence that accumulates chemoresistance, leading to treatment failure. Genomic and transcriptomic features have been associated with differential outcome and treatment response. However, the relationship between events at the gene sequence, copy number, and gene-expression levels remains poorly defined. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We perform multiomic characterization of a large HGSOC cohort (n = 362) with detailed clinical annotation to interrogate the relationship between patient subgroups defined by specific molecular events. RESULTS BRCA2-mutant (BRCA2m) and EMSY-overexpressing cases demonstrated prolonged survival [multivariable hazard ratios (HR) 0.40 and 0.51] and significantly higher first- and second-line chemotherapy response rate. CCNE1-gained (CCNE1g) cases demonstrated underrepresentation of FIGO stage IV cases, with shorter survival but no significant difference in treatment response. We demonstrate marked overlap between the TCGA- and Tothill-derived subtypes. IMR/C2 cases displayed higher BRCA1/2m frequency (25.5%, 32.5%) and significantly greater immune cell infiltration, whereas PRO/C5 cases had the highest CCNE1g rate (23.9%, 22.2%) and were uniformly low in immune cell infiltration. The survival benefit for cases with aberrations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes was apparent across all transcriptomic subtypes (HR range, 0.48-0.68). There was significant co-occurrence of RB loss and HRR gene aberrations; RB loss was further associated with favorable survival within HRR-aberrant cases (multivariable HR, 0.50). CONCLUSIONS These data paint a high-resolution picture of the molecular landscape in HGSOC, better defining patients who may benefit most from specific molecular therapeutics and highlighting those for whom novel treatment strategies are needed to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L. Hollis
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Corresponding Author: Robb L. Hollis, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland, UK. E-mail:
| | - Alison M. Meynert
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Caroline O. Michie
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tzyvia Rye
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Michael Churchman
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Amelia Hallas-Potts
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ian Croy
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Clare Bartos
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Yasushi Iida
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Brian Dougherty
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts
| | - J. Carl Barrett
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts
| | - Ruth March
- Precision Medicine and Biosamples, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Athena Matakidou
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Patricia Roxburgh
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Belfast, UK
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Colin A. Semple
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - D. Paul Harkin
- Almac Diagnostics, Craigavon, UK
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Richard Kennedy
- Almac Diagnostics, Craigavon, UK
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - C. Simon Herrington
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Budczies J, Kluck K, Beck S, Ourailidis I, Allgäuer M, Menzel M, Kazdal D, Perkhofer L, Kleger A, Schirmacher P, Seufferlein T, Stenzinger A. Homologous recombination deficiency is inversely correlated with microsatellite instability and identifies immunologically cold tumors in most cancer types. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY CLINICAL RESEARCH 2022; 8:371-382. [PMID: 35384413 PMCID: PMC9161338 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) leads to DNA double‐strand breaks and can be exploited by the use of poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors to induce synthetic lethality. Extending the original therapeutic concept, the role of HRD is currently being investigated in clinical trials testing immune checkpoint blockers alone or in combination with PARP inhibitors, but the relationship between HRD and immune cell context in cancer is incompletely understood. We analyzed the association between immune cell composition, gene expression, and HRD in 9,041 tumors of 32 solid cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The numbers of genomic scars were quantified by the HRD sum score (HRDsum) including loss of heterozygosity, large‐scale state transitions, and telomeric allelic imbalance. The T‐cell inflamed gene expression profile correlated weakly, but significantly positively, with HRDsum across cancer types (ρ = 0.17). Within individual cancer types, a significantly positive correlation was observed only in breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and four other cancer types, but not in the remaining 26 cancer types. HRDsum and tumor mutational burden (TMB) correlated significantly positively across cancer types (ρ = 0.42) and within 18 cancer types. HRDsum and a proliferation metagene correlated significantly positively across cancer types (ρ = 0.52) and within 20 cancer types. Mismatch repair deficiency and HRD as well as proofreading deficiency showed a high level of exclusivity. High HRD scores were associated with an immunologically activated tumor microenvironment only in a minority of cancer types. Our data favor the combination of genetic markers, complex genomic markers (including HRDsum and TMB), and other molecular markers (including proliferation scores) for a precise and comprehensive read‐out of the tumor biology and an individually tailored treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Budczies
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg and Ulm Partner Sites, Germany.,German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kluck
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Beck
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Allgäuer
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Menzel
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Kazdal
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Perkhofer
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg and Ulm Partner Sites, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Alexander Kleger
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg and Ulm Partner Sites, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg and Ulm Partner Sites, Germany
| | - Thomas Seufferlein
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg and Ulm Partner Sites, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg and Ulm Partner Sites, Germany.,German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Veenstra JP, Bittencourt LFF, Aird KM. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype in ovarian cancer dissemination. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2022; 323:C125-C132. [PMID: 35584328 PMCID: PMC9273281 DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00049.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a highly aggressive disease with poor survival rates in part due to diagnosis after dissemination throughout the peritoneal cavity. It is well-known that inflammatory signals affect ovarian cancer dissemination. Inflammation is a hallmark of cellular senescence, a stable cell cycle arrest induced by a variety of stimuli including many of the therapies used to treat patients with ovarian cancer. Indeed, recent work has illustrated that ovarian cancer cells in vitro, mouse models, and patient tumors undergo senescence in response to platinum-based or poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapies, standard-of-care therapies for ovarian cancer. This inflammatory response, termed the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), is highly dynamic and has pleiotropic roles that can be both beneficial and detrimental in cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic ways. Recent data on other cancer types suggest that the SASP promotes metastasis. Here, we outline what is known about the SASP in ovarian cancer and discuss both how the SASP may promote ovarian cancer dissemination and strategies to mitigate the effects of the SASP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob P. Veenstra
- Department of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Lucas Felipe Fernandes Bittencourt
- Department of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Katherine M. Aird
- Department of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Upregulation of CXCL1 and LY9 contributes to BRCAness in ovarian cancer and mediates response to PARPi and immune checkpoint blockade. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:916-926. [DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01836-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
23
|
Konstantinopoulos PA, Cheng SC, Supko JG, Polak M, Wahner-Hendrickson AE, Ivy SP, Bowes B, Sawyer H, Basada P, Hayes M, Curtis J, Horowitz N, Wright AA, Campos SM, Ivanova EV, Paweletz CP, Palakurthi S, Liu JF, D'Andrea AD, Gokhale PC, Chowdhury D, Matulonis UA, Shapiro GI. Combined PARP and HSP90 inhibition: preclinical and Phase 1 evaluation in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:1027-1036. [PMID: 34887522 PMCID: PMC8980096 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01664-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE PARP inhibitor resistance may be overcome by combinatorial strategies with agents that disrupt homologous recombination repair (HRR). Multiple HRR pathway components are HSP90 clients, so that HSP90 inhibition leads to abrogation of HRR and sensitisation to PARP inhibition. We performed in vivo preclinical studies of the HSP90 inhibitor onalespib with olaparib and conducted a Phase 1 combination study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Tolerability and efficacy studies were performed in patient-derived xenograft(PDX) models of ovarian cancer. Clinical safety, tolerability, steady-state pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of olaparib and onalespib were evaluated using a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. RESULTS Olaparib/onalespib exhibited anti-tumour activity against BRCA1-mutated PDX models with acquired PARPi resistance and PDX models with RB-pathway alterations(CDKN2A loss and CCNE1 overexpression). Phase 1 evaluation revealed that dose levels up to olaparib 300 mg/onalespib 40 mg and olaparib 200 mg/onalespib 80 mg were safe without dose-limiting toxicities. Coadministration of olaparib and onalespib did not appear to affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of either agent. There were no objective responses, but disease stabilisation ≥24 weeks was observed in 7/22 (32%) evaluable patients including patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancers and acquired PARPi resistance and patients with tumours harbouring RB-pathway alterations. CONCLUSIONS Combining onalespib and olaparib was feasible and demonstrated preliminary evidence of anti-tumour activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - S Percy Ivy
- National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Joyce F Liu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kang EY, Millstein J, Popovic G, Meagher NS, Bolithon A, Talhouk A, Chiu DS, Anglesio MS, Leung B, Tang K, Lambie N, Pavanello M, Da-Anoy A, Lambrechts D, Loverix L, Olbrecht S, Bisinotto C, Garcia-Donas J, Ruiz-Llorente S, Yagüe-Fernandez M, Edwards RP, Elishaev E, Olawaiye A, Taylor S, Ataseven B, du Bois A, Harter P, Lester J, Høgdall CK, Armasu SM, Huang Y, Vierkant RA, Wang C, Winham SJ, Heublein S, Kommoss FKF, Cramer DW, Sasamoto N, van-Wagensveld L, Lycke M, Mateoiu C, Joseph J, Pike MC, Odunsi K, Tseng CC, Pearce CL, Bilic S, Conrads TP, Hartmann A, Hein A, Jones ME, Leung Y, Beckmann MW, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Terry KL, El-Bahrawy MA, Coulson P, Etter JL, LaVigne-Mager K, Andress J, Grube M, Fischer A, Neudeck N, Robertson G, Farrell R, Barlow E, Quinn C, Hettiaratchi A, Casablanca Y, Erber R, Stewart CJR, Tan A, Yu Y, Boros J, Brand AH, Harnett PR, Kennedy CJ, Nevins N, Morgan T, Fasching PA, Vergote I, Swerdlow AJ, Candido Dos Reis FJ, Maxwell GL, Neuhausen SL, Barquin-Garcia A, Modugno F, Moysich KB, Crowe PJ, Hirasawa A, Heitz F, Karlan BY, Goode EL, Sinn P, Horlings HM, Høgdall E, Sundfeldt K, Kommoss S, Staebler A, et alKang EY, Millstein J, Popovic G, Meagher NS, Bolithon A, Talhouk A, Chiu DS, Anglesio MS, Leung B, Tang K, Lambie N, Pavanello M, Da-Anoy A, Lambrechts D, Loverix L, Olbrecht S, Bisinotto C, Garcia-Donas J, Ruiz-Llorente S, Yagüe-Fernandez M, Edwards RP, Elishaev E, Olawaiye A, Taylor S, Ataseven B, du Bois A, Harter P, Lester J, Høgdall CK, Armasu SM, Huang Y, Vierkant RA, Wang C, Winham SJ, Heublein S, Kommoss FKF, Cramer DW, Sasamoto N, van-Wagensveld L, Lycke M, Mateoiu C, Joseph J, Pike MC, Odunsi K, Tseng CC, Pearce CL, Bilic S, Conrads TP, Hartmann A, Hein A, Jones ME, Leung Y, Beckmann MW, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Terry KL, El-Bahrawy MA, Coulson P, Etter JL, LaVigne-Mager K, Andress J, Grube M, Fischer A, Neudeck N, Robertson G, Farrell R, Barlow E, Quinn C, Hettiaratchi A, Casablanca Y, Erber R, Stewart CJR, Tan A, Yu Y, Boros J, Brand AH, Harnett PR, Kennedy CJ, Nevins N, Morgan T, Fasching PA, Vergote I, Swerdlow AJ, Candido Dos Reis FJ, Maxwell GL, Neuhausen SL, Barquin-Garcia A, Modugno F, Moysich KB, Crowe PJ, Hirasawa A, Heitz F, Karlan BY, Goode EL, Sinn P, Horlings HM, Høgdall E, Sundfeldt K, Kommoss S, Staebler A, Wu AH, Cohen PA, DeFazio A, Lee CH, Steed H, Le ND, Gayther SA, Lawrenson K, Pharoah PDP, Konecny G, Cook LS, Ramus SJ, Kelemen LE, Köbel M. MCM3 is a novel proliferation marker associated with longer survival for patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2022; 480:855-871. [PMID: 34782936 PMCID: PMC9035053 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03232-0] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) are highly proliferative neoplasms that generally respond well to platinum/taxane chemotherapy. We recently identified minichromosome maintenance complex component 3 (MCM3), which is involved in the initiation of DNA replication and proliferation, as a favorable prognostic marker in HGSC. Our objective was to further validate whether MCM3 mRNA expression and possibly MCM3 protein levels are associated with survival in patients with HGSC. MCM3 mRNA expression was measured using NanoString expression profiling on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue (N = 2355 HGSC) and MCM3 protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (N = 522 HGSC) and compared with Ki-67. Kaplan-Meier curves and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate associations with survival. Among chemotherapy-naïve HGSC, higher MCM3 mRNA expression (one standard deviation increase in the score) was associated with longer overall survival (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.92, p < 0.0001, N = 1840) in multivariable analysis. MCM3 mRNA expression was highest in the HGSC C5.PRO molecular subtype, although no interaction was observed between MCM3, survival and molecular subtypes. MCM3 and Ki-67 protein levels were significantly lower after exposure to neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy-naïve tumors: 37.0% versus 46.4% and 22.9% versus 34.2%, respectively. Among chemotherapy-naïve HGSC, high MCM3 protein levels were also associated with significantly longer disease-specific survival (HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.36-0.74, p = 0.0003, N = 392) compared to cases with low MCM3 protein levels in multivariable analysis. MCM3 immunohistochemistry is a promising surrogate marker of proliferation in HGSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Joshua Millstein
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gordana Popovic
- Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, Stats Central, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicola S Meagher
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Adelyn Bolithon
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Aline Talhouk
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Derek S Chiu
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Histopathology/ISH Core Facility, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Betty Leung
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katrina Tang
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Neil Lambie
- NSW Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marina Pavanello
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia
| | - Annalyn Da-Anoy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liselore Loverix
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Siel Olbrecht
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christiani Bisinotto
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Jesus Garcia-Donas
- HM Sanchinarro Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sergio Ruiz-Llorente
- HM Sanchinarro Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Monica Yagüe-Fernandez
- HM Sanchinarro Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Robert P Edwards
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alexander Olawaiye
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sarah Taylor
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Dr. Horst-Schmidt Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Dr. Horst-Schmidt Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Jenny Lester
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Claus K Høgdall
- Department of Gynaecology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sebastian M Armasu
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Yajue Huang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Robert A Vierkant
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sabine Heublein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix K F Kommoss
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel W Cramer
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Naoko Sasamoto
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lilian van-Wagensveld
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maria Lycke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Constantina Mateoiu
- Department of Pathology and Cytology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Janine Joseph
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Malcolm C Pike
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kunle Odunsi
- Department of Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Chiu-Chen Tseng
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sanela Bilic
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Australia
| | - Thomas P Conrads
- Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael E Jones
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Yee Leung
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Australia
- Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Minouk J Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mona A El-Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - John L Etter
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | - Juergen Andress
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anna Fischer
- Institute of Pathology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nina Neudeck
- Institute of Pathology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Greg Robertson
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St George Private Hospital, Kogarah, Australia
| | | | - Ellen Barlow
- Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carmel Quinn
- Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, Stats Central, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Translational Cancer Research Network, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- UNSW Biorepository, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anusha Hettiaratchi
- UNSW Biorepository, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Yovanni Casablanca
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, USAF, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Colin J R Stewart
- School for Women's and Infants' Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Adeline Tan
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Western Women's Pathology, Western Diagnostic Pathology, Wembley, Australia
| | - Yu Yu
- School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Jessica Boros
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison H Brand
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul R Harnett
- The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney-West Cancer Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nikilyn Nevins
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Terry Morgan
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Francisco J Candido Dos Reis
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - G Larry Maxwell
- Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Philip J Crowe
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Akira Hirasawa
- Department of Clinical Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Dr. Horst-Schmidt Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Peter Sinn
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Estrid Høgdall
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Molecular Unit, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul A Cohen
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Bendat Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia
| | - Anna DeFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney-West Cancer Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Helen Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kate Lawrenson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gottfried Konecny
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Linda S Cook
- School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Bureau of Population Health Data Analytics & Informatics, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Xie B, Tan G, Ren J, Lu W, Pervaz S, Ren X, Otoo AA, Tang J, Li F, Wang Y, Wang M. RB1 Is an Immune-Related Prognostic Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:830908. [PMID: 35299734 PMCID: PMC8920998 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.830908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most lethal gynecologic malignancies and a leading cause of death in the world. Thus, this necessitates identification of prognostic biomarkers which will be helpful in its treatment. Methods The gene expression profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GSE31245 were selected as the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analysis was used to analyze the difference in overall survival (OS) between high and low RB transcriptional corepressor 1 (RB1) expression groups. To confirm whether RB1 was an independent risk factor for OC, we constructed a multivariate Cox regression model. Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways enrichment analyses were conducted to identify the functions of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The associations of RB1 with immune infiltration and immune checkpoints were studied by the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER 2.0) and the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA). The immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to compare the expression level of RB1 in normal tissues and tumor samples, and to predict the prognosis of OC. Results The KM survival curve of the TCGA indicated that the OS in the high-risk group was lower than that in the low-risk group (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.28-2.02, P = 3×10-5), which was validated in GSE31245 (HR = 4.08, 95% CI: 1.21–13.74, P = 0.01) and IHC. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that RB1 was an independent prognostic biomarker (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.31-2.10, P = 2.02×10-5). Enrichment analysis suggested that the DEGs were mainly involved in cell cycle, DNA replication, and mitochondrial transition. The infiltration levels of fibroblast, neutrophil, monocyte and macrophage were positively correlated with RB1. Furthermore, RB1 was associated with immune checkpoint molecules (CTLA4, LAG3, and CD274). The IHC staining revealed higher expression of RB1 in tumor tissues as compared to that in normal tissues (P = 0.019). Overexpression of RB1 was associated with poor prognosis of OC (P = 0.01). Conclusion These findings suggest that RB1 was a novel and immune-related prognostic biomarker for OC, which may be a promising target for OC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biao Xie
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Guangqing Tan
- Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jingyi Ren
- Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Weiyu Lu
- Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Sadaf Pervaz
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Reproduction and Development of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xinyi Ren
- Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Antonia Adwoa Otoo
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Reproduction and Development of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jing Tang
- Department of Bioinformatics, School of Basic Medical Science, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Fangfang Li
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Reproduction and Development of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yingxiong Wang
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Reproduction and Development of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Meijiao Wang
- Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.,Joint International Research Laboratory of Reproduction and Development of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yang L, Xie HJ, Li YY, Wang X, Liu XX, Mai J. Molecular mechanisms of platinum‑based chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer (Review). Oncol Rep 2022; 47:82. [PMID: 35211759 PMCID: PMC8908330 DOI: 10.3892/or.2022.8293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Cisplatin is one of the most effective chemotherapy drugs for ovarian cancer, but resistance is common. The initial response to platinum‑based chemotherapy is as high as 80%, but in most advanced patients, final relapse and death are caused by acquired drug resistance. The development of resistance to therapy in ovarian cancer is a significant hindrance to therapeutic efficacy. The resistance of ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapeutic mechanisms is rather complex and includes multidrug resistance, DNA damage repair, cell metabolism, oxidative stress, cell cycle regulation, cancer stem cells, immunity, apoptotic pathways, autophagy and abnormal signaling pathways. The present review provided an update of recent developments in our understanding of the mechanisms of ovarian cancer platinum‑based chemotherapy resistance, discussed current and emerging approaches for targeting these patients and presented challenges associated with these approaches, with a focus on development and overcoming resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Yang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China
| | - Hong-Jian Xie
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China
| | - Ying-Ying Li
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China
| | - Xia Wang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China
| | - Xing-Xin Liu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China
| | - Jia Mai
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
The Evolution of Ovarian Carcinoma Subclassification. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020416. [PMID: 35053578 PMCID: PMC8774015 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Historically, cancers presenting with their main tumor mass in the ovary have been classified as ovarian carcinomas (a concise term for epithelial ovarian cancer) and treated with a one-size-fits-all approach. Over the last two decades, a growing molecular understanding established that ovarian carcinomas consist of several distinct histologic types, which practically represent different diseases. Further research is now delineating several molecular subtypes within each histotype. This histotype/molecular subtype subclassification provides a framework of grouping tumors based on molecular similarities for research, clinical trial inclusion and future patient management. Abstract The phenotypically informed histotype classification remains the mainstay of ovarian carcinoma subclassification. Histotypes of ovarian epithelial neoplasms have evolved with each edition of the WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumours. The current fifth edition (2020) lists five principal histotypes: high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), mucinous carcinoma (MC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC) and clear cell carcinoma (CCC). Since histotypes arise from different cells of origin, cell lineage-specific diagnostic immunohistochemical markers and histotype-specific oncogenic alterations can confirm the morphological diagnosis. A four-marker immunohistochemical panel (WT1/p53/napsin A/PR) can distinguish the five principal histotypes with high accuracy, and additional immunohistochemical markers can be used depending on the diagnostic considerations. Histotypes are further stratified into molecular subtypes and assessed with predictive biomarker tests. HGSCs have recently been subclassified based on mechanisms of chromosomal instability, mRNA expression profiles or individual candidate biomarkers. ECs are composed of the same molecular subtypes (POLE-mutated/mismatch repair-deficient/no specific molecular profile/p53-abnormal) with the same prognostic stratification as their endometrial counterparts. Although methylation analyses and gene expression and sequencing showed at least two clusters, the molecular subtypes of CCCs remain largely elusive to date. Mutational and immunohistochemical data on LGSC have suggested five molecular subtypes with prognostic differences. While our understanding of the molecular composition of ovarian carcinomas has significantly advanced and continues to evolve, the need for treatment options suitable for these alterations is becoming more obvious. Further preclinical studies using histotype-defined and molecular subtype-characterized model systems are needed to expand the therapeutic spectrum for women diagnosed with ovarian carcinomas.
Collapse
|
28
|
Yoo TK, Kang J, Lee A, Chae BJ. A triple-negative breast cancer surrogate subtype classification that correlates with gene expression subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 191:599-610. [PMID: 35018542 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06437-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study developed a triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) surrogate subtype classification that represents TNBC subtypes based on the Vanderbilt subtype classification. METHODS Patients who underwent primary curative surgery for TNBC were included. Representative FFPE blocks were used for gene expression analysis and tissue microarray construction for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. The Vanderbilt subtypes were re-classified into four groups: basal-like (BL), mesenchymal-like (M), immunomodulatory (IM) and luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype. Classification and regression tree (CART) modeling was applied to develop a surrogate subtype classification. RESULTS A total of 145 patients were included. The study cohort was allocated to the Vanderbilt 4 subtypes as LAR (n = 22, 15.2%), IM (n = 32, 22.1%), M (n = 38, 26.2%), BL (n = 25, 17.2%) and unclassified (n = 28, 19.3%). After excluding nine (6.2%) patients due to poor IHC staining quality, CART modeling was performed. TNBC surrogate subtypes were defined as follows: LAR subtype, androgen receptor Allred score 8; IM subtype, LAR-negative with a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) score > 70%; M subtype, LAR-negative with a TIL score < 20%; BL subtype, LAR-negative with a TIL score 20-70% and diffuse, strong p16 staining. The study cohort was classified by the surrogate subtypes as LAR (n = 26, 17.9%), IM (n = 21, 14.5%), M (n = 44, 30.3%), BL1 (n = 27, 18.6%) and unclassified (n = 18, 12.4%). Surrogate subtypes predicted TNBC Vanderbilt 4 subtypes with an accuracy of 0.708. CONCLUSION We have developed a TNBC surrogate subtype classification that correlates with the Vanderbilt subtype. It is a practical and accessible diagnostic test that can be easily applied in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae-Kyung Yoo
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.,Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Kang
- Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Awon Lee
- Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Joo Chae
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cunningham JM, Winham SJ, Wang C, Weiglt B, Fu Z, Armasu SM, McCauley BM, Brand AH, Chiew YE, Elishaev E, Gourley C, Kennedy CJ, Laslavic A, Lester J, Piskorz A, Sekowska M, Brenton JD, Churchman M, DeFazio A, Drapkin R, Elias KM, Huntsman DG, Karlan BY, Köbel M, Konner J, Lawrenson K, Papaemmanuil E, Bolton KL, Modugno F, Goode EL. DNA Methylation Profiles of Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:132-141. [PMID: 34697060 PMCID: PMC8755592 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a rare ovarian cancer histotype that tends to be resistant to standard platinum-based chemotherapeutics. We sought to better understand the role of DNA methylation in clinical and biological subclassification of OCCC. METHODS We interrogated genome-wide methylation using DNA from fresh frozen tumors from 271 cases, applied nonsmooth nonnegative matrix factorization (nsNMF) clustering, and evaluated clinical associations and biological pathways. RESULTS Two approximately equally sized clusters that associated with several clinical features were identified. Compared with Cluster 2 (N = 137), Cluster 1 cases (N = 134) presented at a more advanced stage, were less likely to be of Asian ancestry, and tended to have poorer outcomes including macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery (P < 0.10). Subset analyses of targeted tumor sequencing and IHC data revealed that Cluster 1 tumors showed TP53 mutation and abnormal p53 expression, and Cluster 2 tumors showed aneuploidy and ARID1A/PIK3CA mutation (P < 0.05). Cluster-defining CpGs included 1,388 CpGs residing within 200 bp of the transcription start sites of 977 genes; 38% of these genes (N = 369 genes) were differentially expressed across cluster in transcriptomic subset analysis (P < 10-4). Differentially expressed genes were enriched for six immune-related pathways, including IFNα and IFNγ responses (P < 10-6). CONCLUSIONS DNA methylation clusters in OCCC correlate with disease features and gene expression patterns among immune pathways. IMPACT This work serves as a foundation for integrative analyses that better understand the complex biology of OCCC in an effort to improve potential for development of targeted therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M Cunningham
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Britta Weiglt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zhuxuan Fu
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sebastian M Armasu
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bryan M McCauley
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Alison H Brand
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yoke-Eng Chiew
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angela Laslavic
- Womens Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Anna Piskorz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Magdalena Sekowska
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Churchman
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Anna DeFazio
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ronny Drapkin
- Penn Ovarian Cancer Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - David G Huntsman
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Laboratory and Pathology Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jason Konner
- Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kate Lawrenson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Elli Papaemmanuil
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kelly L Bolton
- Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Womens Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Liang L, Mai S, Mai G, Chen Y, Liu L. DNA damage repair-related gene signature predicts prognosis and indicates immune cell infiltration landscape in skin cutaneous melanoma. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:882431. [PMID: 35957812 PMCID: PMC9361349 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.882431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND DNA damage repair plays an important role in the onset and progression of cancers and its resistance to treatment therapy. This study aims to assess the prognostic potential of DNA damage repair markers in skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM). METHOD In this study, we have analyzed the gene expression profiles being downloaded from TCGA, GTEx, and GEO databases. We sequentially used univariate and LASSO Cox regression analyses to screen DNA repair genes associated with prognosis. Then, we have conducted a multivariate regression analysis to construct the prognostic profile of DNA repair-related genes (DRRGs). The risk coefficient is used to calculate the risk scores and divide the patients into two cohorts. Additionally, we validated our prognosis model on an external cohort as well as evaluated the link between immune response and the DRRGs prognostic profiles. The risk signature is compared to immune cell infiltration, chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment. RESULTS An analysis using LASSO-Cox stepwise regression established a prognostic signature consisting of twelve DRRGs with strong predictive ability. Disease-specific survival (DSS) is found to be lower among high-risk patients group as compared to low-risk patients. The signature may be employed as an independent prognostic predictor after controlling for clinicopathological factors, as demonstrated by validation on one external GSE65904 cohort. A strong correlation is also found between the risk score and the immune microenvironment, along with the infiltrating immune cells, and ICIs key molecules. The gene enrichment analysis results indicate a wide range of biological activities and pathways to be exhibited by high-risk groups. Furthermore, Cisplatin exhibited a considerable response sensitivity in low-risk groups as opposed to the high-risk incidents, while docetaxel exhibited a considerable response sensitivity in high-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide a thorough investigation of DRRGs to develop an DSS-related prognostic indicator which may be useful in forecasting SKCM progression and enabling more enhanced clinical benefits from immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liping Liang
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shijie Mai
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Genghui Mai
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ye Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Integrated Clinical Microecology Center, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
- *Correspondence: Le Liu, ; Ye Chen,
| | - Le Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Integrated Clinical Microecology Center, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
- *Correspondence: Le Liu, ; Ye Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Xu Q, Li Z. Update on Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer With Non-BRCA Mutations. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:743073. [PMID: 34912215 PMCID: PMC8667582 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.743073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) has become an important maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer after surgery and cytotoxic chemotherapy, which has changed the disease management model of ovarian cancer, greatly decreased the risk of recurrence, and made the prognosis of ovarian cancer better to certain extent. The three PARPis currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of ovarian cancer are Olaparib, Niraparib and Rucaparib. With the incremental results from new clinical trials, the applicable population of PARPi for ovarian cancer have expanded to population with non-BRCA mutations. Although BRCA mutated population are still the main beneficiaries of PARPi, recent clinical trials indicated PARPis' therapeutic potential in non-BRCA mutated population, especially in homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) positive population. However, lack of unified HRD status detection method poses a challenge for the accurate selection of PARPi beneficiaries. The reversal of homologous recombination (HR) function during the treatment will not only cause resistance to PARPis, but also reduce the accuracy of the current method to determine HRD status. Therefore, the development of reliable HRD status detection methods to determine the beneficiary population, as well as rational combination treatment are warranted. This review mainly summarizes the latest clinical trial results and combination treatment of PARPis in ovarian cancer with non-BRCA mutations, and discusses the application prospects, including optimizing combination therapy against drug resistance, developing unified and accurate HRD status detection methods for patient selection and stratification. This review further poses an interesting topic: the efficacy and safety in patients retreated with PARPis after previous PARPi treatment---"PARPi after PARPi".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zhengyu Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
The Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor Is Required for the NUP98-HOXA9-Induced Aberrant Nuclear Envelope Phenotype. Cells 2021; 10:cells10112851. [PMID: 34831074 PMCID: PMC8616146 DOI: 10.3390/cells10112851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromosomal translocations involving the nucleoporin NUP98 gene are recurrently identified in leukemia; yet, the cellular defects accompanying NUP98 fusion proteins are poorly characterized. NUP98 fusions cause changes in nuclear and nuclear envelope (NE) organization, in particular, in the nuclear lamina and the lamina associated polypeptide 2α (LAP2α), a regulator of the tumor suppressor retinoblastoma protein (RB). We demonstrate that, for NUP98-HOXA9 (NHA9), the best-studied NUP98 fusion protein, its effect(s) on nuclear architecture largely depend(s) on RB. Morphological alterations caused by the expression of NHA9 are largely diminished in the absence of RB, both in human cells expressing the human papillomavirus 16 E7 protein and in mouse embryonic fibroblasts lacking RB. We further show that NHA9 expression associates with distinct histone modification. Moreover, the pattern of trimethylation of histone H3 lysine-27 is affected by NHA9, again in an RB-dependent manner. Our results pinpoint to an unexpected interplay between NUP98 fusion proteins and RB, which may contribute to leukemogenesis.
Collapse
|
33
|
Swisher EM, Kristeleit RS, Oza AM, Tinker AV, Ray-Coquard I, Oaknin A, Coleman RL, Burris HA, Aghajanian C, O'Malley DM, Leary A, Welch S, Provencher D, Shapiro GI, Chen LM, Shapira-Frommer R, Kaufmann SH, Goble S, Maloney L, Kwan T, Lin KK, McNeish IA. Characterization of patients with long-term responses to rucaparib treatment in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:490-497. [PMID: 34602290 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe molecular and clinical characteristics of patients with high-grade recurrent ovarian carcinoma (HGOC) who had long-term responses to the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib. METHODS This post hoc analysis pooled patients from Study 10 (NCT01482715; Parts 2A and 2B; n = 54) and ARIEL2 (NCT01891344; Parts 1 and 2; n = 491). Patients with investigator-assessed complete or partial response per RECIST were classified based on duration of response (DOR): long (≥1 year), intermediate (6 months to <1 year), or short (<6 months). Next-generation sequencing was used to detect deleterious mutations and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in tumors. RESULTS Overall, 25.3% (138/545) of enrolled patients were responders. Of these, 27.5% (38/138) had long-term responses; 28.3% (39/138) were intermediate- and 34.8% (48/138) were short-term responders. Most of the long-term responders harbored a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) mutation (71.1%, 27/38), and BRCA structural variants were most frequent among long-term responders (14.8%; 4/27). Responders with HGOC harboring a BRCA structural variant (n = 5) had significantly longer DOR than patients with other mutation types (n = 81; median not reached vs 0.62 years; HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.10-0.43; unadjusted p = 0.014). Among responders with BRCA wild-type HGOC, most long- and intermediate-term responders had high genome-wide LOH: 81.8% (9/11) and 76.9% (10/13), respectively, including 7 with deleterious RAD51C, RAD51D, or CDK12 mutations. CONCLUSION Among patients who responded to rucaparib, a substantial proportion achieved responses lasting ≥1 year. These analyses demonstrate the relationship between DOR to PARP inhibitor treatment and molecular characteristics in HGOC, such as presence of reversion-resistant BRCA structural variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Swisher
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Rebecca S Kristeleit
- Department of Oncology, University College London (UCL) Cancer Institute and UCL Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Amit M Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard and University Claude Bernard and Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), Lyon, France
| | - Ana Oaknin
- Gynecologic Cancer Program, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Howard A Burris
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alexandra Leary
- Gynecological Unit, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, INSERM U981, and Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), Villejuif, France
| | - Stephen Welch
- Division of Medical Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Diane Provencher
- Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Geoffrey I Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lee-May Chen
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Sandra Goble
- Biostatistics, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Lara Maloney
- Clinical Development, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Tanya Kwan
- Molecular Diagnostics, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Kevin K Lin
- Molecular Diagnostics, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Iain A McNeish
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Virani S, Baiocchi G, Bowtell D, Cabasag CJ, Cho KR, Fortner RT, Fujiwara K, Kim JW, Köbel M, Kurtz JE, Levine DA, Menon U, Norquist BM, Pharoah PDP, Sood AK, Tworoger ST, Wentzensen N, Chanock SJ, Brennan P, Trabert B. Joint IARC/NCI International Cancer Seminar Series Report: expert consensus on future directions for ovarian carcinoma research. Carcinogenesis 2021; 42:785-793. [PMID: 34037709 PMCID: PMC8427725 DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgab043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, ovarian cancer research has evolved considerably because of the emerging recognition that rather than a single disease, ovarian carcinomas comprise several different histotypes that vary by etiologic origin, risk factors, molecular profiles, therapeutic approaches and clinical outcome. Despite significant progress in our understanding of the etiologic heterogeneity of ovarian cancer, as well as important clinical advances, it remains the eighth most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide and the most fatal gynecologic cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer and the United States National Cancer Institute jointly convened an expert panel on ovarian carcinoma to develop consensus research priorities based on evolving scientific discoveries. Expertise ranged from etiology, prevention, early detection, pathology, model systems, molecular characterization and treatment/clinical management. This report summarizes the current state of knowledge and highlights expert consensus on future directions to continue advancing etiologic, epidemiologic and prognostic research on ovarian carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shama Virani
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Genomic Epidemiology Branch, Lyon, France
| | - Glauco Baiocchi
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - David Bowtell
- Women’s Cancer Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Citadel J Cabasag
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Kathleen R Cho
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Keiichi Fujiwara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- Department of Medical and Surgical Oncology and Hematology, Strasbourg Cancer Institute (ICANS-Europe), Strasbourg, France
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Pearlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC CTU at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Barbara M Norquist
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shelley T Tworoger
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paul Brennan
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Genomic Epidemiology Branch, Lyon, France
| | - Britton Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Baum J, Braicu EI, Hunsicker O, Vergote I, Concin N, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Feldheiser A, Achimas-Cadariu P, Darb-Esfahani S, Berger A, Fetica B, Mahner S, Papadia A, Wölber L, Gasparri ML, Vanderstichele A, Benedetti Panici P, Mueller MD, Ruscito I, Woopen H, Sehouli J. Impact of clinical factors and surgical outcome on long-term survival in high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a multicenter analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:713-720. [PMID: 33563640 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Long-term survivors of ovarian cancer are a unique group of patients in whom prognostic factors for long-term survival have been poorly described. Such factors may provide information for a more personalized therapeutic approach. The objective of this study is to determine further characteristics of long-term survivors with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. METHODS Long-term survivors were defined as patients living longer than 8 years after first diagnosis and were recruited within seven high volume centers across Europe from November 1988 to November 2008. The control group included patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer with less than 5 years' survival identified from the systematic 'Tumorbank ovarian cancer' database. A subanalysis of Charité patients only was performed separately for in-depth analysis of tumor dissemination. Propensity score matching with nearest-neighbor caliper width was used to match long-term survivors and the control group regarding age, FIGO stage, and residual tumor. RESULTS A total of 276 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer were included, divided into 131 long-term survivors and 145 control group patients. After propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, platinum sensitivity (p=0.002) was an independent favorable prognostic factor whereas recurrence (p<0.001) and ascites (p=0.021) were independent detrimental predictors for long-term survival. Significantly more long-term survivors tested positive for mutation in the BRCA1 gene than the BRCA2 gene (p=0.016). Intraoperatively, these patients had less tumor involvement of the upper abdomen at initial surgery (p=0.024). Complexity of surgery and surgical techniques were similar in both cohorts. CONCLUSION Platinum sensitivity constitutes a favorable factor for long-term survival whereas tumor involvement of the upper abdomen, ascites, and recurrence have a negative impact. Based on clinical estimation, long-term survival is associated with combinations of clinical, surgical, and molecular factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Baum
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Hunsicker
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, CCM / CVK Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicole Concin
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aarne Feldheiser
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, CCM / CVK Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Patriciu Achimas-Cadariu
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Surgical and Gynecological Oncology, The Oncology Institute Cluj-Napoca, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Silvia Darb-Esfahani
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Astrid Berger
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Bogdan Fetica
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Pathology, Oncology Institute Prof Dr Ion Chiricuta, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Sven Mahner
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of the Italian Switzerland (USI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Linn Wölber
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of the Italian Switzerland (USI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Adriaan Vanderstichele
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Michael D Mueller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ilary Ruscito
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Gynecology Division, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Hannah Woopen
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Liu X, Li X, Li J. Long Non-coding RNA FEZF1-AS1 Promotes Growth and Reduces Apoptosis Through Regulation of miR-363-3p/PAX6 Axis in Retinoblastoma. Biochem Genet 2021; 59:637-651. [PMID: 33432525 PMCID: PMC8096736 DOI: 10.1007/s10528-020-10026-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Retinoblastoma is the most common malignancy in children's eyes with high incidence. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play important roles in the progression of retinoblastoma. LncRNA FEZF1 antisense RNA 1 (FEZF1-AS1) has been found to stimulate retinoblastoma. However, the mechanism of FEZF1-AS1 underlying progression of retinoblastoma is still unclear. In current study, FEZF1-AS1 was up-regulated in retinoblastoma tissues and cells. FEZF1-AS1 overexpression enhanced retinoblastoma cell viability, promoted cell cycle, and inhibited apoptosis. Conversely, FEZF1-AS1 knockdown reduced cell viability, cycle, and elevated apoptosis. The interaction between FEZF1-AS1 and microRNA-363-3p (miR-363-3p) was confirmed. FEZF1-AS1 down-regulated miR-363-3p and up-regulated PAX6. PAX6 was a target gene of miR-363-3p. EZF1-AS1 promoted retinoblastoma cell viability and suppressed apoptosis via PAX6. Further, we demonstrated that FEZF1-AS1 contribute to tumor formation in vivo. In conclusion, FEZF1-AS1 elevated growth and inhibited apoptosis by regulating miR-363-3p/PAX6 in retinoblastoma, which provide a new target for retinoblastoma treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuming Liu
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 1, Huanghe Road, Huaiyin District, Huaian, 223300, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Xiaofeng Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 1, Huanghe Road, Huaiyin District, Huaian, 223300, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jianchang Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 1, Huanghe Road, Huaiyin District, Huaian, 223300, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Guo E, Wu C, Ming J, Zhang W, Zhang L, Hu G. The Clinical Significance of DNA Damage Repair Signatures in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Front Genet 2021; 11:593039. [PMID: 33488669 PMCID: PMC7820869 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.593039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA damage repair plays an important role in cancer’s initiation and progression, and in therapeutic resistance. The prognostic potential of damage repair indicators was studied in the case of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Gene expression profiles of the disease were downloaded from cancer genome databases and gene ontology was applied to the DNA repair-related genes. Twenty-six differentially expressed DNA repair genes were identified, and regression analysis was used to identify those with prognostic potential and to construct a risk model. The model accurately predicted patient outcomes and distinguished among patients with different expression levels of immune evasion genes. The data indicate that DNA repair genes can be valuable for predicting the progression of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and the clinical benefits of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ergang Guo
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, Wuhan
| | - Cheng Wu
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, Wuhan
| | - Jun Ming
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, Wuhan
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, Wuhan
| | - Linli Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, Wuhan
| | - Guoqing Hu
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, Wuhan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dono A, Ramesh AV, Wang E, Shah M, Tandon N, Ballester LY, Esquenazi Y. The role of RB1 alteration and 4q12 amplification in IDH-WT glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdab050. [PMID: 34131647 PMCID: PMC8193911 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies have identified that glioblastoma IDH-wildtype (GBM IDH-WT) might be comprised of molecular subgroups with distinct prognoses. Therefore, we investigated the correlation between genetic alterations and survival in 282 GBM IDH-WT patients, to identify subgroups with distinct outcomes. METHODS We reviewed characteristics of GBM IDH-WT (2009-2019) patients analyzed by next-generation sequencing interrogating 205 genes and 26 rearrangements. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated with the log-rank test and Cox regression models. We validated our results utilizing data from cBioPortal (MSK-IMPACT dataset). RESULTS Multivariable analysis of GBM IDH-WT revealed that treatment with chemoradiation and RB1-mutant status correlated with improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.25, P < .001 and HR 0.47, P = .002) and OS (HR 0.24, P < .001 and HR 0.49, P = .016). In addition, younger age (<55 years) was associated with improved OS. Karnofsky performance status less than 80 (HR 1.44, P = .024) and KDR amplification (HR 2.51, P = .008) were predictors of worse OS. KDR-amplified patients harbored coexisting PDGFRA and KIT amplification (P < .001) and TP53 mutations (P = .04). RB1-mutant patients had less frequent CDKN2A/B and EGFR alterations (P < .001). Conversely, RB1-mutant patients had more frequent TP53 (P < .001) and SETD2 (P = .006) mutations. Analysis of the MSK-IMPACT dataset (n = 551) validated the association between RB1 mutations and improved PFS (11.0 vs 8.7 months, P = .009) and OS (34.7 vs 21.7 months, P = .016). CONCLUSIONS RB1-mutant GBM IDH-WT is a molecular subgroup with improved PFS and OS. Meanwhile, 4q12 amplification (KDR/PDGFRA/KIT) denoted patients with worse OS. Identifying subgroups of GBM IDH-WT with distinct survival is important for optimal clinical trial design, incorporation of targeted therapies, and personalized neuro-oncological care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Dono
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Mauli Shah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nitin Tandon
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
- Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMC, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Leomar Y Ballester
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
- Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMC, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yoshua Esquenazi
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
- Center for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
- Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMC, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Role of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase inhibitors beyond BReast CAncer Gene-mutated ovarian tumours: definition of homologous recombination deficiency? Curr Opin Oncol 2020; 32:442-450. [PMID: 32796232 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW PARP inhibitors have transformed the management of BRCA mutant (BRCA) high-grade serous and endometroid ovarian cancer (HGOC). However, it is clear that the benefit can be extended beyond this subgroup, particularly to those cancers with homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD). We review emerging molecular and clinical data to support the use of PARP inhibitors in HRD HGOC and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different HRD assays. RECENT FINDINGS Several phase 3 trials support the use of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy beyond those patients with BRCA in the first-line and platinum-sensitive relapse setting. Many of these studies included HRD testing and it is clear, regardless of the assay used, that an incremental reduction in benefit is observed from BRCA tumours to HRD to homologous recombination proficient tumours. However, although currently available HRD assays predict the magnitude of benefit from PARP inhibitors, they consistently fail to identify a subgroup of patients who do not benefit. SUMMARY Clinical data support the use of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy beyond BRCA patients. Current HRD tests lack negative predictive value and more research is required to develop a composite HRD assay that provides a dynamic readout of HRD status.
Collapse
|
40
|
Cong S, Guo Q, Cheng Y, He Y, Zhao X, Kong C, Ning S, Zhang G. Immune Characterization of Ovarian Cancer Reveals New Cell Subtypes With Different Prognoses, Immune Risks, and Molecular Mechanisms. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020; 8:614139. [PMID: 33409283 PMCID: PMC7779527 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.614139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OV) is a considerable threat to the health of women due to its complex mechanisms and atypical symptoms. Various currently available treatments fail to substantially increase the survival rate of OV patients. The tumor microenvironment (TME) is gaining attention due to its role in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. This study mainly investigated the immune characteristics of OV by CIBERSORT and MCP-counter. We reclassified OV into four TME cell subtypes with different prognoses and evaluated the infiltration of the cells in each subtype. The immune risk of diverse subtypes was evaluated based on the immunoscore calculated by Cox regression analysis. The molecular mechanisms and hallmark pathways of the four subtypes were analyzed. The results indicate that the immune procancer cell subtype is associated with the worst prognosis, closely related to the high immune risk group, and characterized by low expression of checkpoints and MHC class I and II molecules, high expression of hypoxia-related genes, high enrichment of the EMT and hypoxia pathways, and low enrichment of the DNA repair and interferon α response pathways. This study contributes to the investigation of immune mechanisms and identifies more effective targets for immunotherapy of OV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanshan Cong
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Qiuyan Guo
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yan Cheng
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yanan He
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Xibo Zhao
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Congcong Kong
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Shangwei Ning
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Guangmei Zhang
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Genomic profiling of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: The road into druggable targets. Semin Cancer Biol 2020; 77:29-41. [PMID: 33161141 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic cancer. High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most frequent histologic subtype and while it is a highly platinum-sensitive cancer at initial treatment, nearly 90 % of stage IIIC patients recur in 5 years and eventually become resistant to platinum treatment. Historically, the definition of platinum-resistant disease is based on the time interval between last platinum therapy and recurrence shorter than 6 months. Nowadays the use of sophisticated imaging techniques and serum markers to detect recurrence makes the accuracy of this clinical definition less clear and even more debatable as we begin to better understand the molecular landscape of HGSC and markers of platinum resistance and sensitivity. HGSC is characterized by a low frequency of recurrent mutations, great genomic instability with widespread copy number variations, universal TP53 mutations, and homologous recombination deficiency in more than 50 % of cases. Platinum agents form DNA adducts and intra- and inter-strand cross-links in the DNA. Most of DNA repair pathways are involved at some point in the repair of platinum induced DNA damaging, most notably homologous recombination, Fanconi Anemia, and nucleotide excision repair pathways. Mechanisms of platinum resistance are related mostly to the limitation of platinum-DNA adduct formation by changing cellular pharmacology, and to the prevention of cell death after DNA damage due to alterations in DNA repair pathways and cell cycle regulation. Understanding these mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance may help to define the utility of platinum re-challenge in each situation and guide new therapeutic opportunities. Moreover, the discovery of mechanisms of synthetic lethality related to alterations in DNA repair and cell cycle regulation pathways has opened up a new avenue for drug therapy in the last decade. In the present article, we review pathways involved in platinum-induced DNA damage repair and their relationship with genomic alterations present in HGSC. Moreover, we report new treatment strategies that are underway to target these alterations.
Collapse
|
42
|
Bley N, Schott A, Müller S, Misiak D, Lederer M, Fuchs T, Aßmann C, Glaß M, Ihling C, Sinz A, Pazaitis N, Wickenhauser C, Vetter M, Ungurs O, Strauss HG, Thomssen C, Hüttelmaier S. IGF2BP1 is a targetable SRC/MAPK-dependent driver of invasive growth in ovarian cancer. RNA Biol 2020; 18:391-403. [PMID: 32876513 PMCID: PMC7951963 DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2020.1812894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a hallmark of aggressive, mesenchymal-like high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). The SRC kinase is a key driver of cancer-associated EMT promoting adherens junction (AJ) disassembly by phosphorylation-driven internalization and degradation of AJ proteins. Here, we show that the IGF2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1) is up-regulated in mesenchymal-like HGSOC and promotes SRC activation by a previously unknown protein-ligand-induced, but RNA-independent mechanism. IGF2BP1-driven invasive growth of ovarian cancer cells essentially relies on the SRC-dependent disassembly of AJs. Concomitantly, IGF2BP1 enhances ERK2 expression in an RNA-binding dependent manner. Together this reveals a post-transcriptional mechanism of interconnected stimulation of SRC/ERK signalling in ovarian cancer cells. The IGF2BP1-SRC/ERK2 axis is targetable by the SRC-inhibitor saracatinib and MEK-inhibitor selumetinib. However, due to IGF2BP1-directed stimulation, only combinatorial treatment effectively overcomes the IGF2BP1-promoted invasive growth in 3D culture conditions as well as intraperitoneal mouse models. In conclusion, we reveal an unexpected role of IGF2BP1 in enhancing SRC/MAPK-driven invasive growth of ovarian cancer cells. This provides a rationale for the therapeutic benefit of combinatorial SRC/MEK inhibition in mesenchymal-like HGSOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Bley
- Sect. Molecular Cell Biology, Inst. of Molecular Medicine, Charles Tanford Protein Center, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Schott
- Sect. Molecular Cell Biology, Inst. of Molecular Medicine, Charles Tanford Protein Center, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Simon Müller
- Sect. Molecular Cell Biology, Inst. of Molecular Medicine, Charles Tanford Protein Center, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Danny Misiak
- Sect. Molecular Cell Biology, Inst. of Molecular Medicine, Charles Tanford Protein Center, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Marcell Lederer
- Sect. Molecular Cell Biology, Inst. of Molecular Medicine, Charles Tanford Protein Center, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Tommy Fuchs
- Sect. Molecular Cell Biology, Inst. of Molecular Medicine, Charles Tanford Protein Center, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Chris Aßmann
- Sect. Molecular Cell Biology, Inst. of Molecular Medicine, Charles Tanford Protein Center, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Markus Glaß
- Sect. Molecular Cell Biology, Inst. of Molecular Medicine, Charles Tanford Protein Center, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Christian Ihling
- Dept. of Pharmaceutical Chemistry & Bioanalytics, Inst. of Pharmacy, Charles Tanford Protein Center, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Andrea Sinz
- Dept. of Pharmaceutical Chemistry & Bioanalytics, Inst. of Pharmacy, Charles Tanford Protein Center, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Pazaitis
- Inst. of Pathology, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Claudia Wickenhauser
- Inst. of Pathology, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Martina Vetter
- Clinics for Gynecology, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Olga Ungurs
- Clinics for Gynecology, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Hans-Georg Strauss
- Clinics for Gynecology, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Clinics for Gynecology, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Stefan Hüttelmaier
- Sect. Molecular Cell Biology, Inst. of Molecular Medicine, Charles Tanford Protein Center, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wu A, Zhang S, Liu J, Huang Y, Deng W, Shu G, Yin G. Integrated Analysis of Prognostic and Immune Associated Integrin Family in Ovarian Cancer. Front Genet 2020; 11:705. [PMID: 32765584 PMCID: PMC7379341 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Human integrin receptors are important for cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion in normal epithelial cells. Emerging evidences have indicated integrin members are involved in cancer development and progression as well. However, the expression patterns and clinical significance of the whole integrin family in ovarian cancer (OC) have not yet been well understood. In the present study, we utilized the public datasets including GEPIA, GEO, ONCOMINE, cBioPortal, Kaplan-Meier Plotter, TIMER databases, to analyze the expression and prognostic value of integrin members in OC. We found ITGA3/B4/B6/B7/B8 were abnormally overexpressed in OC; ITGA6 was good prognosis predictor in OC; ITGA3/ B4/B8 were poor prognosis predictor specially in advanced OC patients; elevated ITGA3/B4 might promote metastasis and elevated ITGA3/B8 might promote platinum resistance of OC; ITGA3 and ITGB4 might synergistically or independently regulate cell adhesion and proliferation; ITGA4/AL/AM/AX/B2/B7 showed strong correlations with various tumor immune infiltrates (TILs), especially with pro-tumor immunes cell types like monocyte, M2 macrophage and exhaustion T cells infiltration; ITGAL/AM/B2/B7 and residing memory CD8+ T cells marker ITGAE were specially associated with early OC patients outcome. Our results implied that ITGA3/B4 were important prognostic markers of advanced OC, ITGAL/AM/ B2/B7 were immune associated prognosis markers of early OC, together they might render important therapeutic targets for OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anqi Wu
- Department of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Sai Zhang
- Deparment of Pathology, School of Basic Medicine Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jiaqi Liu
- Deparment of Pathology, School of Basic Medicine Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yifeng Huang
- Department of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wenyu Deng
- Departmemt of Nursing, School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Guang Shu
- Deparment of Pathology, School of Basic Medicine Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Gang Yin
- Department of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Deparment of Pathology, School of Basic Medicine Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Knarr M, Avelar RA, Sekhar SC, Kwiatkowski LJ, Dziubinski ML, McAnulty J, Skala S, Avril S, Drapkin R, DiFeo A. miR-181a initiates and perpetuates oncogenic transformation through the regulation of innate immune signaling. Nat Commun 2020; 11:3231. [PMID: 32591511 PMCID: PMC7320168 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17030-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic instability (GI) predisposes cells to malignant transformation, however the molecular mechanisms that allow for the propagation of cells with a high degree of genomic instability remain unclear. Here we report that miR-181a is able to transform fallopian tube secretory epithelial cells through the inhibition of RB1 and stimulator-of-interferon-genes (STING) to propagate cells with a high degree of GI. MiR-181a targeting of RB1 leads to profound nuclear defects and GI generating aberrant cytoplasmic DNA, however simultaneous miR-181a mediated inhibition of STING allows cells to bypass interferon mediated cell death. We also found that high miR-181a is associated with decreased IFNγ response and lymphocyte infiltration in patient tumors. DNA oncoviruses are the only known inhibitors of STING that allow for cellular transformation, thus, our findings are the first to identify a miRNA that can downregulate STING expression to suppress activation of intrinsic interferon signaling. This study introduces miR-181a as a putative biomarker and identifies the miR-181a-STING axis as a promising target for therapeutic exploitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Knarr
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.,Department of Pathology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Rita A Avelar
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.,Department of Pathology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.,The Rogel Cancer Center, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Sreeja C Sekhar
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.,Department of Pathology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.,The Rogel Cancer Center, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Lily J Kwiatkowski
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Michele L Dziubinski
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.,Department of Pathology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.,The Rogel Cancer Center, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Jessica McAnulty
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.,Department of Pathology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.,The Rogel Cancer Center, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Stephanie Skala
- Department of Pathology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Stefanie Avril
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.,Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Ronny Drapkin
- Penn Ovarian Cancer Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Analisa DiFeo
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. .,Department of Pathology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. .,The Rogel Cancer Center, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Functional genomics identifies new synergistic therapies for retinoblastoma. Oncogene 2020; 39:5338-5357. [PMID: 32572160 PMCID: PMC7391301 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-020-1372-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Local intravitreal or intra-arterial chemotherapy has improved therapeutic success for the pediatric cancer retinoblastoma (RB), but toxicity remains a major caveat. RB initiates primarily with RB1 loss or, rarely, MYCN amplification, but the critical downstream networks are incompletely understood. We set out to uncover perturbed molecular hubs, identify synergistic drug combinations to target these vulnerabilities, and expose and overcome drug resistance. We applied dynamic transcriptomic analysis to identify network hubs perturbed in RB versus normal fetal retina, and performed in vivo RNAi screens in RB1null and RB1wt;MYCNamp orthotopic xenografts to pinpoint essential hubs. We employed in vitro and in vivo studies to validate hits, define mechanism, develop new therapeutic modalities, and understand drug resistance. We identified BRCA1 and RAD51 as essential for RB cell survival. Their oncogenic activity was independent of BRCA1 functions in centrosome, heterochromatin, or ROS regulation, and instead linked to DNA repair. RAD51 depletion or inhibition with the small molecule inhibitor, B02, killed RB cells in a Chk1/Chk2/p53-dependent manner. B02 further synergized with clinically relevant topotecan (TPT) to engage this pathway, activating p53-BAX mediated killing of RB but not human retinal progenitor cells. Paradoxically, a B02/TPT-resistant tumor exhibited more DNA damage than sensitive RB cells. Resistance reflected dominance of the p53-p21 axis, which mediated cell cycle arrest instead of death. Deleting p21 or applying the BCL2/BCL2L1 inhibitor Navitoclax re-engaged the p53-BAX axis, and synergized with B02, TPT or both to override resistance. These data expose new synergistic therapies to trigger p53-induced killing in diverse RB subtypes.
Collapse
|
46
|
Magrill J, Karnezis AN, Tessier-Cloutier B, Talhouk A, Kommoss S, Cochrane D, Chow C, Cheng A, Soslow R, Hauptmann S, du Bois A, Pfisterer J, Gilks CB, Huntsman DG, Kommoss F. Tubo-Ovarian Transitional Cell Carcinoma and High-grade Serous Carcinoma Show Subtly Different Immunohistochemistry Profiles. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2020; 38:552-561. [PMID: 30059451 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Tubo-ovarian transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) is grouped with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) in the current World Health Organization classification. TCC is associated with BRCA mutations and a better prognosis compared with HGSC. Previous papers examining the immunohistochemical features of TCC have studied limited numbers of samples. No marker reflecting the biological difference between TCC and HGSC is known. We collected a large cohort of TCC to determine whether TCC and HGSC could be distinguished by immunohistochemistry. A tissue microarray was built from 89 TCC and a control cohort of 232 conventional HGSC. Immunohistochemistry was performed, scored, and statistically analyzed for routine markers of HGSC and urothelial tumors: PAX8, WT1, p53, p16, ER, p63, and GATA3. Using scoring cutoffs commonly employed in clinical practice, the immunohistochemical profile of TCC was indistinguishable from HGSC for all markers. However, more detailed scoring criteria revealed statistically significant differences between the 2 groups of tumors with respect to ER, PAX8, and WT1. HGSC showed more diffuse and intense staining for PAX8 (P=0.004 and 0.001, respectively) and WT1 (P=0.002 and 0.002, respectively); conversely, TCC showed more intense staining for ER (P=0.007). TCC and HGSC therefore show subtle differences in their immunohistochemical profiles which might reflect underlying (epi)genetic differences. Further studies using proteomic analysis will focus on the identification of differentially expressed proteins that might serve as markers of TCC-like differentiation, which could help explain biologic differences between TCC and HGSC and might identify other cases of HGSC with a better prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Magrill
- British Columbia Cancer Agency (J.M., A.N.K., A.T., D.C., D.G.H.) Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia (A.N.K., B.T.-C., C.C., A.C., C.B.G., D.G.H.), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (R.S.) Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands (S.H.) Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen (S.K.) Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.D.B.) Gynecologic Oncology Center, Kiel (J.P.) Institute of Pathology, Friedrichshafen (F.K.), Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tuna M, Ju Z, Yoshihara K, Amos CI, Tanyi JL, Mills GB. Clinical relevance of TP53 hotspot mutations in high-grade serous ovarian cancers. Br J Cancer 2020; 122:405-412. [PMID: 31780779 PMCID: PMC7000721 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0654-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mutation of TP53 is the most frequent genetic alteration in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The impact of hotspot mutations of TP53 and protein levels on patient outcomes in HGSOC has not been fully elucidated. METHODS The study population (n = 791) comprised of HGSOC samples with TP53 mutation from TCGA and other publicly available data. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to select variables that were correlated with patient survival. RESULTS We assessed the effects of TP53 mutations based on type and individual hotspot mutations on patient outcomes in HGSOC. Only hotspot mutations were associated with outcomes. Three hotspot mutations: G266, Y163C, and R282, in aggregate were associated with a worsened overall and recurrence-free survival compared with other hotspot mutations (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.001), other non-hotspot missense mutations (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.008), truncated mutations (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.001), and all other mutations (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.001). Specific hotspot mutations were associated with different protein expression patterns consistent with different functions. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence that individual TP53 hotspot mutations have different impact on HGSOC patient outcomes and potentially TP53 function. Thus the status of particular TP53 aberrations could influence response to therapy and selection of therapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Musaffe Tuna
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
- Precision Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Zhenlin Ju
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kosuke Yoshihara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | | | - Janos L Tanyi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Gordon B Mills
- Precision Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Cell, Developmental & Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Fan Z, Hu L, Ouyang T, Li J, Wang T, Fan Z, Fan T, Lin B, Xu Y, Xie Y. Germline mutation in DNA-repair genes is associated with poor survival in BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer patients. Cancer Sci 2019; 110:3368-3374. [PMID: 31432574 PMCID: PMC7938415 DOI: 10.1111/cas.14175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BRCA1/2 genes are the most frequently germline mutated DNA‐repair genes, and the survival of BRCA1/2 carriers has been extensively explored in breast cancer. However, the prevalence of germline mutations in non‐BRCA1/2 DNA‐repair genes and the survival of carriers are largely unknown in a large cohort of unselected breast cancer patients. Germline mutations in 16 DNA‐repair genes were determined using a multigene panel in 7657 BRCA1/2‐negative breast cancer patients who were unselected for family history of cancer or age at diagnosis. Among the 7657 BRCA1/2‐negative breast cancer patients, 257 (3.4%) carried at least 1 pathogenic germline mutation in the 16 DNA‐repair genes. The prevalence of DNA‐repair gene mutations was significantly higher in familial breast cancers (5.2%, P = 0.002) and early‐onset breast cancers (diagnosed at and before the age of 40) (4.5%, P = 0.003) than that of sporadic breast cancers (2.9%) (diagnosed above age of 40), respectively. The DNA‐repair gene mutation carriers were significantly more likely to have a larger tumor (P = 0.04) and axillary lymph node metastasis (P = 0.03). Moreover, DNA‐repair gene mutation was an independent unfavorable factor for recurrence‐free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.00‐1.91, P = 0.05) and disease‐specific survival (adjusted HR=1.63, 95% CI: 1.04‐2.57, P = 0.03) in this cohort. Overall, 3.4% of BRCA1/2‐negative breast cancer patients carried germline mutations in the 16 DNA‐repair genes, and the DNA‐repair gene mutation carriers exhibited an aggressive phenotype and had poor survival compared with noncarriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenhua Fan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Li Hu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Ouyang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jinfeng Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tianfeng Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhaoqing Fan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tie Fan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Benyao Lin
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ye Xu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuntao Xie
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
RB1 Deletion in Retinoblastoma Protein Pathway-Disrupted Cells Results in DNA Damage and Cancer Progression. Mol Cell Biol 2019; 39:MCB.00105-19. [PMID: 31138663 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.00105-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Proliferative control in cancer cells is frequently disrupted by mutations in the retinoblastoma protein (RB) pathway. Intriguingly, RB1 mutations can arise late in tumorigenesis in cancer cells whose RB pathway is already compromised by another mutation. In this study, we present evidence for increased DNA damage and instability in cancer cells with RB pathway defects when RB1 mutations are induced. We generated isogenic RB1 mutant genotypes with CRISPR/Cas9 in a number of cell lines. Cells with even one mutant copy of RB1 have increased basal levels of DNA damage and increased mitotic errors. Elevated levels of reactive oxygen species as well as impaired homologous recombination repair underlie this DNA damage. When xenografted into immunocompromised mice, RB1 mutant cells exhibit an elevated propensity to seed new tumors in recipient lungs. This study offers evidence that late-arising RB1 mutations can facilitate genome instability and cancer progression that are beyond the preexisting proliferative control deficit.
Collapse
|
50
|
Rajitha B, Malla RR, Vadde R, Kasa P, Prasad GLV, Farran B, Kumari S, Pavitra E, Kamal MA, Raju GSR, Peela S, Nagaraju GP. Horizons of nanotechnology applications in female specific cancers. Semin Cancer Biol 2019; 69:376-390. [PMID: 31301361 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 06/23/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Female-specific cancers are the most common cancers in women worldwide. Early detection methods remain unavailable for most of these cancers, signifying that most of them are diagnosed at later stages. Furthermore, current treatment options for most female-specific cancers are surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. Although important milestones in molecularly targeted approaches have been achieved lately, current therapeutic strategies for female-specific cancers remain limited, ineffective and plagued by the emergence of chemoresistance, which aggravates prognosis. Recently, the application of nanotechnology to the medical field has allowed the development of novel nano-based approaches for the management and treatment of cancers, including female-specific cancers. These approaches promise to improve patient survival rates by reducing side effects, enabling selective delivery of drugs to tumor tissues and enhancing the uptake of therapeutic compounds, thus increasing anti-tumor activity. In this review, we focus on the application of nano-based technologies to the design of novel and innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in the context of female-specific cancers, highlighting their potential uses and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balney Rajitha
- Department of Pathology, WellStar Hospital, Marietta, GA, 30060, USA
| | - Rama Rao Malla
- Department of Biochemistry, GITAM Institute of Science, GITAM University, Visakhapatnam, AP, 530045, India
| | - Ramakrishna Vadde
- Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, AP, 516003, India
| | - Prameswari Kasa
- Dr. LV Prasad Diagnostics and Research Laboratory, Khairtabad, Hyderabad, TS, 500004, India
| | | | - Batoul Farran
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Seema Kumari
- Department of Biochemistry, GITAM Institute of Science, GITAM University, Visakhapatnam, AP, 530045, India
| | - Eluri Pavitra
- Department of Biological Engineering, Biohybrid Systems Research Center (BSRC), Inha University, 100, Inha-ro, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea
| | - Mohammad Amjad Kamal
- King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box 80216, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia; Enzymoics, 7 Peterlee Place, Hebersham, NSW 2770, Australia; Novel Global Community Educational Foundation, Australia
| | - Ganji Seeta Rama Raju
- Department of Energy and Materials Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
| | - Sujatha Peela
- Department of Biotechnology, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, Srikakulam, AP, 532410, India
| | - Ganji Purnachandra Nagaraju
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| |
Collapse
|