1
|
Drew Y, Kim JW, Penson RT, O'Malley DM, Parkinson C, Roxburgh P, Plummer R, Im SA, Imbimbo M, Ferguson M, Rosengarten O, Steeghs N, Kim MH, Gal-Yam E, Tsoref D, Kim JH, You B, De Jonge M, Lalisang R, Gort E, Bastian S, Meyer K, Feeney L, Baker N, Ah-See ML, Domchek SM, Banerjee S. Olaparib plus Durvalumab, with or without Bevacizumab, as Treatment in PARP Inhibitor-Naïve Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: A Phase II Multi-Cohort Study. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:50-62. [PMID: 37939124 PMCID: PMC10767301 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-2249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early results from the phase II MEDIOLA study (NCT02734004) in germline BRCA1- and/or BRCA2-mutated (gBRCAm) platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) showed promising efficacy and safety with olaparib plus durvalumab. We report efficacy and safety of olaparib plus durvalumab in an expansion cohort of women with gBRCAm PSROC (gBRCAm expansion doublet cohort) and two cohorts with non-gBRCAm PSROC, one of which also received bevacizumab (non-gBRCAm doublet and triplet cohorts). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this open-label, multicenter study, PARP inhibitor-naïve patients received olaparib plus durvalumab treatment until disease progression; the non-gBRCAm triplet cohort also received bevacizumab. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR; gBRCAm expansion doublet cohort), disease control rate (DCR) at 24 weeks (non-gBRCAm cohorts), and safety (all cohorts). RESULTS The full analysis and safety analysis sets comprised 51, 32, and 31 patients in the gBRCAm expansion doublet, non-gBRCAm doublet, and non-gBRCAm triplet cohorts, respectively. ORR was 92.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 81.1-97.8] in the gBRCAm expansion doublet cohort (primary endpoint); DCR at 24 weeks was 28.1% (90% CI, 15.5-43.9) in the non-gBRCAm doublet cohort (primary endpoint) and 74.2% (90% CI, 58.2-86.5) in the non-gBRCAm triplet cohort (primary endpoint). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 47.1%, 65.6%, and 61.3% of patients in the gBRCAm expansion doublet, non-gBRCAm doublet, and non-gBRCAm triplet cohorts, respectively, most commonly anemia. CONCLUSIONS Olaparib plus durvalumab continued to show notable clinical activity in women with gBRCAm PSROC. Olaparib plus durvalumab with bevacizumab demonstrated encouraging clinical activity in women with non-gBRCAm PSROC. No new safety signals were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvette Drew
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer – Vancouver and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Richard T. Penson
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David M. O'Malley
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Christine Parkinson
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Roxburgh
- Medical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, and School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Plummer
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Martina Imbimbo
- Immuno-oncology Service, Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michelle Ferguson
- Department of Oncology, NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Ora Rosengarten
- Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Neeltje Steeghs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Min Hwan Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Daliah Tsoref
- Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus, Petach Tikva and Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Jae-Hoon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Benoit You
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, CITOHL, EPSLYON, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon, IC-HCL, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Maja De Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roy Lalisang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW – School of Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Eelke Gort
- Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sara Bastian
- Medical Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital Graubuenden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Kassondra Meyer
- Late Development Oncology, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Laura Feeney
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel Baker
- Oncology Biometrics, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Mei-Lin Ah-See
- Late-stage Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Susan M. Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Susana Banerjee
- Gynaecology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kurtz JE, Pujade-Lauraine E, Oaknin A, Belin L, Leitner K, Cibula D, Denys H, Rosengarten O, Rodrigues M, de Gregorio N, Martinez García J, Petru E, Kocián R, Vergote I, Pautier P, Schmalfeldt B, Gaba L, Polterauer S, Mouret Reynier MA, Sehouli J, Churruca C, Selle F, Joly F, D'Hondt V, Bultot-Boissier É, Lebreton C, Lotz JP, Largillier R, Heudel PE, Heitz F. Atezolizumab Combined With Bevacizumab and Platinum-Based Therapy for Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer: Placebo-Controlled Randomized Phase III ATALANTE/ENGOT-ov29 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4768-4778. [PMID: 37643382 PMCID: PMC10602539 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Platinum-based doublets with concurrent and maintenance bevacizumab are standard therapy for ovarian cancer (OC) relapsing after a platinum-free interval (PFI) >6 months. Immunotherapy may be synergistic with bevacizumab and chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS ATALANTE/ENGOT-ov29 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02891824), a placebo-controlled double-blinded randomized phase III trial, enrolled patients with recurrent epithelial OC, one to two previous chemotherapy lines, and PFI >6 months. Eligible patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to atezolizumab (1,200 mg once every 3 weeks or equivalent) or placebo for up to 24 months, combined with bevacizumab and six cycles of chemotherapy doublet, stratified by PFI, PD-L1 status, and chemotherapy regimen. Coprimary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and PD-L1-positive populations (alpha .025 for each population). RESULTS Between September 2016 and October 2019, 614 patients were randomly assigned: 410 to atezolizumab and 204 to placebo. Only 38% had PD-L1-positive tumors. After 3 years' median follow-up, the PFS difference between atezolizumab and placebo did not reach statistical significance in the ITT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.99; P = .041; median 13.5 v 11.3 months, respectively) or PD-L1-positive (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.16; P = .30; median 15.2 v 13.1 months, respectively) populations. The immature overall survival (OS) HR was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.01; median 35.5 v 30.6 months with atezolizumab v placebo, respectively). Global health-related quality of life did not differ between treatment arms. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 88% of atezolizumab-treated and 87% of placebo-treated patients; grade ≥3 AEs typical of immunotherapy were more common with atezolizumab (13% v 8%, respectively). CONCLUSION ATALANTE/ENGOT-ov29 did not meet its coprimary PFS objectives in the ITT or PD-L1-positive populations. OS follow-up continues. Further research on biopsy samples is warranted to decipher the immunologic landscape of late-relapsing OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- Department of Medical and Surgical Oncology & Hematology, ICANS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Eric Pujade-Lauraine
- Association de Recherche sur les CAncers dont GYnécologiques (ARCAGY)-GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Ana Oaknin
- Gynaecologic Cancer Programme, Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lisa Belin
- Biostatistics and Public Health Department, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpětriére – Charles Foix, Paris, France
| | - Katharina Leitner
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ora Rosengarten
- Oncology Department, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Manuel Rodrigues
- Department of Medical Oncology and INSERM U830, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Nikolaus de Gregorio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- SLK Klinikum Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Jeronimo Martinez García
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen Arrixaca (El Palmar) and Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | - Edgar Petru
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Roman Kocián
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Barbara Schmalfeldt
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lydia Gaba
- Department of Medical Oncology, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut D'Investigacions Biomédiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stephan Polterauer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cristina Churruca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia, Spain
| | - Frédéric Selle
- Oncology Department, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Florence Joly
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Véronique D'Hondt
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Émilie Bultot-Boissier
- Oncology Department, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | | | - Jean-Pierre Lotz
- Medical Oncology Service, Hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux Universitaires de l'Est Parisien, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Rémy Largillier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France
| | | | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Corn BW, Rosengarten O. Innovation at life's end: a moment for hope. Ann Oncol 2021; 33:15-16. [PMID: 34673159 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- B W Corn
- Hebrew University, Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel; Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - O Rosengarten
- Hebrew University, Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel; Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bar-Shalom R, Rosengarten O, Heching N, Turner Y, Ruchlemer R. [FDG PET/CT FOR TREATMENT RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN CANCER]. Harefuah 2021; 160:462-467. [PMID: 34263575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
FDG PET/CT (fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT)) imaging reflects functional-metabolic changes occurring within the malignant process in response to therapy. Since these changes usually precede anatomic alterations, this imaging technique is highly valuable in assessing response during and after therapy and is superior to CT. FDG PET/CT following initiation of cancer therapy has a prognostic value, predicting progression free survival and overall survival. In some malignancies FDG PET/CT can guide personalized medicine by tailoring therapy in accordance with the metabolic cancer response in the individual patient. In lymphoma patients, including Hodgkin's disease (HD) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), FDG PET/CT is useful for monitoring response and guiding therapy, both after and early during therapy. Various quantitative and visual criteria systems are used for assessing cancer response to therapy by FDG PET/CT. Acquaintance with these interpretation methods and their adjustment to new anti-cancerous mechanisms such as in immunotherapy, is important for accurate imaging and meaningful interpretation. Large prospective meticulously performed studies, using standardized methodology, are required to further establish and expand the use of FDG PET/CT for the assessment of response to therapy in various malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Bar-Shalom
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem
| | - Ora Rosengarten
- Department of Oncology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem
| | - Norman Heching
- Department of Oncology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem
| | - Yehonatan Turner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem
| | - Rosa Ruchlemer
- Department of Hematology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gabizon AA, Cherny N, Isacson R, Abu Remilah A, Gabizon A, Shmeeda H, Rosengarten O. A phase 1b study of chemoimmunotherapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and pembrolizumab in estrogen receptor-positive, endocrine-resistant breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.1049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1049 Background: This is a single center phase 1b study of a regimen of pembrolizumab (PBZ) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in endocrine-resistant breast cancer. PLD was chosen as chemotherapy component because it is mildly myelosuppressive and non-immunosuppressive and contains doxorubicin, a strong immunogenic cell death inducer. Methods: Patients with estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative, metastatic breast cancer, whose disease progressed on hormonal and biological therapy and up to 2 chemotherapy lines were eligible for enrollment. PLD, 30 mg/m2, and PBZ, 200 mg flat dose, were infused on day 1 of every 3-week cycles. The main study objectives were safe dose clearance, characterization of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), tumor response, and pharmacokinetic analysis of PLD and PBZ during the first 3 cycles of treatment in a 1st cohort of 6 patients and a 2nd confirmatory cohort of 6-9 patients. Patients with partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) continued on the extended phase of the study consisting of 9 additional cycles during which further safety information was collected. All patients were followed-up for survival. Results: 12 patients were recruited (median age 61 y, range 45-91). 9 patients had received prior doxorubicin treatment. 82 treatments have been administered (median: 7, range 2-13). Overall, treatment was well tolerated. DLT including infusion reactions, grade ≥2 myelosuppression, hair loss and mucocutaneous toxicity were not observed in the first 3 cycles. Subsequently, skin toxicity (grade 2-3 palmar-plantar erythema) was observed forcing treatment delays of 1-2 weeks. Except for 2 cases of subclinical hypothyroidism, there were no other apparent PBZ-related side-effects. There was no evidence of cardiac toxicity. There were 2 early deaths (days 25 and 45) probably related to disease progression. Upon reevaluation on week 9, we observed: 2 patients with PD, 4 with SD, 2 with PR (15+ and 5+ mth), 1 with no measurable disease, and 1 early to evaluate. Three out of 5 patients responded well to post-study chemotherapy with durable improvement or stabilization (range, 5 to 11+ mth). Median follow-up is 14 mth. Median survival has not been reached with 4 deaths and a longest survivor of 19+ mth. Median progression-free survival is 6.0 mth. The clearance of PLD was slow with high Cmax, long T½ and small Vd. There was a significant increase in the AUC of PLD between the 1st and 3rd cycle (median: 2,649 vs 3,422 mg*h/l, p = 0.039). Analysis of PBZ plasma levels is ongoing. Conclusions: The combination of PLD and PBZ is well tolerated and feasible for extended treatment. Dose interval of PLD should be lengthened to 4 weeks after 2-3 cycles to prevent skin toxicity. The late appearance of skin toxicity is probably related to a delay in PLD clearance after 2 treatment cycles with PLD and PBZ. Clinical trial information: NCT03591276 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rut Isacson
- Shaare Zedek MC-Oncology Institute, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Evron E, Ben-David AM, Goldberg H, Fried G, Kaufman B, Catane R, Pfeffer MR, Geffen DB, Chernobelsky P, Karni T, Abdah-Bortnyak R, Rosengarten O, Matceyevsky D, Inbar M, Kuten A, Corn BW. Prophylactic irradiation to the contralateral breast for BRCA mutation carriers with early-stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2020; 30:412-417. [PMID: 30475942 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women who carry germ-line mutations in BRCA1/2 are at very high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. Breast conserving therapy is associated with a similar risk of ipsilateral cancer recurrence in BRCA carriers compared with non-carriers. However, the risk of subsequent contralateral breast cancer in carriers is markedly increased. Therefore, mastectomy of the diseased breast along with risk reducing mastectomy of the contralateral breast is often advocated for BRCA carriers who are treated for early breast cancer. Yet, many BRCA carriers forgo this option for fear of harmful effects and choose breast conserving treatment and observation instead. In Israel, BRCA-associated breast cancer is relatively common. Accordingly, a national protocol was devised for this enriched population. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this Institutional Review Board-approved phase II trial, the option of prophylactic irradiation to the contralateral breast, in addition to standard loco-regional treatment, was offered to BRCA carrier patients treated for early breast cancer who declined contralateral mastectomy. The primary end point was contralateral breast cancer. RESULTS Between May 2007 and October 2017, 162 patients were enrolled. Eighty-one patients opted for standard loco-regional treatment including surgery and radiation to the involved side (control arm) and 81 patients chose additional contralateral breast irradiation (intervention arm). At a median follow-up of 58 months, 10 patients developed contralateral breast cancer in the control arm at a median of 32 months, as compared with 2 patients in the intervention arm who developed contralateral breast cancer 80 and 105 months after bilateral breast irradiation (log-rank P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS Among BRCA carrier patients treated for early breast cancer, the addition of contralateral breast irradiation was associated with a significant reduction of subsequent contralateral breast cancers and a delay in their onset. CLINICAL TRIAL Phase II, comparative two-arm trial (NCT00496288).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Evron
- Oncology, Kaplan Medical Institute, Rehovot; Hadassah Medical School, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem
| | - A M Ben-David
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv; Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan
| | - H Goldberg
- Oncology Institute, Galilee Medical Center, Naharia
| | - G Fried
- Oncology Divisio, Rambam Health Care Campus, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa
| | - B Kaufman
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv; Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan
| | - R Catane
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv; Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan
| | | | - D B Geffen
- Department of Oncology, Soroka Medical Center, Beer-Sheva; Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva
| | - P Chernobelsky
- Department of Oncology, Soroka Medical Center, Beer-Sheva
| | - T Karni
- Assaf Harofe Medical Center, Zerifin
| | - R Abdah-Bortnyak
- Oncology Divisio, Rambam Health Care Campus, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa
| | | | | | - M Inbar
- Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv
| | - A Kuten
- Oncology Divisio, Rambam Health Care Campus, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa
| | - B W Corn
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stemmer SM, Steiner M, Rizel S, Ben-Baruch N, Uziely B, Jakubowski DM, Baron J, Shak S, Soussan-Gutman L, Bareket-Samish A, Fried G, Rosengarten O, Itay A, Nisenbaum B, Katz D, Leviov M, Tokar M, Liebermann N, Geffen DB. Ten-year clinical outcomes in N0 ER+ breast cancer patients with Recurrence Score-guided therapy. NPJ Breast Cancer 2019; 5:41. [PMID: 31728408 PMCID: PMC6841708 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-019-0137-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay is a validated prognosticator/predictor of chemotherapy (CT) benefit in early-stage estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC). Long-term data from real-life clinical practice where treatment was guided by the RS result are lacking. We performed exploratory analysis of the Clalit Health Services (CHS) registry, which included all CHS patients with node-negative ER+ HER2-negative BC who underwent RS testing between 1/2006 and 12/2009 to determine 10-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for distant recurrence/BC-specific mortality (BCSM) in this cohort. The analysis included 1365 patients. Distribution of RS results: RS 0-10, 17.8%; RS 11-25, 62.5%; RS 26-100, 19.7%. Corresponding CT use: 0, 9.4, and 69.9%. Ten-year distant recurrence rates in patients with RS 0-10, 11-25, and 26-100: 2.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-6.2%), 6.1% (95% CI, 4.4-8.6%), and 13.1% (95% CI, 9.4-18.3%), respectively (P < 0.001); corresponding BCSM rates: 0.7% (95% CI 0.1-5.1%), 2.2% (95% CI, 1.3-3.7%), and 9.5% (95% CI, 6.0-14.9%) (P < 0.001). When the analysis included patients treated with endocrine therapy alone (95.5/87.5% of patients with RS 0-10/11-25), 10-year distant recurrence and BCSM rates for RS 0-10 patients were 2.7% (95% CI, 1.1-6.5%) and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.1-5.3%), respectively, and for RS 11-25 patients, 5.7% (95% CI, 3.9-8.3%) and 2.0% (95% CI, 1.1-3.7%), respectively. For RS 11-25 patients, no statistically significant differences were observed in 10-year distant recurrence/BCSM rates between CT-treated and untreated patients; however, this should be interpreted cautiously since the number of events was low and patients were not randomized. In conclusion, in node-negative ER+ HER2-negative BC patients, where treatment decisions in real-life clinical practice incorporated the RS, patients with RS 0-25 (~80% of patients, <10% CT use) had excellent outcomes at 10 years. Patients with RS 26-100 had high distant recurrence risk despite CT use and are candidates for new treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salomon M. Stemmer
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Beatrice Uziely
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Georgeta Fried
- Oncology Dept., Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ora Rosengarten
- Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Amit Itay
- Oncology Dept., Sheba Medical Center at Tel HaShomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | | | - Daniela Katz
- Oncology Dept., Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel
| | | | - Margarita Tokar
- Department of Oncology, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | | | - David B. Geffen
- Department of Oncology, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Berek JS, Matulonis UA, Peen U, Ghatage P, Mahner S, Redondo A, Lesoin A, Colombo N, Vergote I, Rosengarten O, Ledermann J, Pineda M, Ellard S, Sehouli J, Gonzalez-Martin A, Berton-Rigaud D, Madry R, Reinthaller A, Hazard S, Guo W, Mirza MR. Safety and dose modification for patients receiving niraparib. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:859. [PMID: 30107447 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
|
9
|
Rottenstreich M, Armon S, Beller U, Rosengarten O, Vernea F, Reichman O. Recurrence of endometrial carcinoma presenting as vulvar lesions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019; 145:123-124. [DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Revised: 11/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Misgav Rottenstreich
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyShaare Zedek Medical CenterHebrew University Jerusalem Israel
| | - Shunit Armon
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyShaare Zedek Medical CenterHebrew University Jerusalem Israel
| | - Uzi Beller
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyShaare Zedek Medical CenterHebrew University Jerusalem Israel
| | - Ora Rosengarten
- Department of OncologyShaare Zedek Medical CenterHebrew University Jerusalem Israel
| | - Fiona Vernea
- Department of PathologyShaare Zedek Medical CenterHebrew University Jerusalem Israel
| | - Orna Reichman
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyShaare Zedek Medical CenterHebrew University Jerusalem Israel
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Laitman Y, Michaelson-Cohen R, Levi E, Chen-Shtoyerman R, Reish O, Josefsberg Ben-Yehoshua S, Bernstein-Molho R, Keinan-Boker L, Rosengarten O, Silverman BG, Perri T, Korach J, Mor P, Ephrat Ben-Baruch N, Levy Lahad E, Friedman E. Uterine cancer in Jewish Israeli BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Cancer 2018; 125:698-703. [PMID: 30489631 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2018] [Revised: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer, leading to the recommendation of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) at 35-40 years of age. The role, if any, that BRCA mutations play in conferring uterine cancer risk, is unresolved. METHOD Jewish Israeli women, carriers of one of the predominant Jewish mutations in BRCA1/2 from 1998 to 2016, were recruited. Cancer diagnoses were determined through the Israeli National Cancer Registry. Uterine cancer risk was assessed by computing the standardized incidence ratio of observed-to-expected number of cases, using the exact 2-sided P value of Poisson count. RESULTS Overall, 2627 eligible mutation carriers were recruited from 1998 to 2016, 2312 (88%) of whom were Ashkenazi Jews (1463 BRCA1, 1154 BRCA2 mutation carriers, 10 double mutation carriers). Among these participants, 1310 underwent RRSO without hysterectomy at a mean (± standard deviation) age of 43.6 years (± 4.4 years). During 32,774 women-years of follow up, 14 women developed uterine cancer, and the observed-to-expected rate of all histological subtypes was 3.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.17-6.67; P < .001). For serous papillary (n = 5), the observed-to-expected ratio was 14.29 (95% CI, 4.64-33.34; P < .001), and for sarcoma (n = 4) it was 37.74 (95% CI, 10.28-96.62). These rates were also higher than those detected in a group of 1844 age- and ethnicity-matched women (53% with breast cancer). CONCLUSION Israeli BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers are at an increased risk for developing uterine cancer, especially serous papillary and sarcoma. These elevated risks of uterine cancer should be discussed with BRCA carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yael Laitman
- Oncogenetics Unit, Institute of Human Genetics, and Meirav High Risk Clinic, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Rachel Michaelson-Cohen
- Genetics Institute and NOGA High Risk Clinic, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Einat Levi
- Genetics Institute and NOGA High Risk Clinic, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Rakefet Chen-Shtoyerman
- Oncogenetics Clinic, Clinical Genetics Institute, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Orit Reish
- Genetics Institute, Assaf Harofe Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel
| | - Sagi Josefsberg Ben-Yehoshua
- Oncogenetics Clinic, Clinical Genetics Institute, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Rinat Bernstein-Molho
- Breast Cancer Unit, Oncology Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Lital Keinan-Boker
- Israeli National Cancer Registry, Ministry of Health, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.,School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ora Rosengarten
- Gyneco-Oncology Unit, Institute of Oncology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Barbara G Silverman
- Israeli National Cancer Registry, Ministry of Health, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Tamar Perri
- Department of Gyneco-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Jacob Korach
- Department of Gyneco-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Pnina Mor
- Genetics Institute and NOGA High Risk Clinic, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Noa Ephrat Ben-Baruch
- Oncology Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ephrat Levy Lahad
- Genetics Institute and NOGA High Risk Clinic, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Eitan Friedman
- Oncogenetics Unit, Institute of Human Genetics, and Meirav High Risk Clinic, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bossi P, Antonuzzo A, Cherny NI, Rosengarten O, Pernot S, Trippa F, Schuler U, Snegovoy A, Jordan K, Ripamonti CI. Diarrhoea in adult cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:iv126-iv142. [PMID: 29931177 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- P Bossi
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano
| | - A Antonuzzo
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 1, Polo Oncologico Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - N I Cherny
- Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - O Rosengarten
- Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - S Pernot
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - F Trippa
- Radiation Oncology Centre, "S. Maria" Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - U Schuler
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Palliative Care Centre, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - A Snegovoy
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - K Jordan
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C I Ripamonti
- Oncology-Supportive Care in Cancer Unit, Department Onco-Haematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Berek J, Matulonis U, Peen U, Ghatage P, Mahner S, Redondo A, Lesoin A, Colombo N, Vergote I, Rosengarten O, Ledermann J, Pineda M, Ellard S, Sehouli J, Gonzalez-Martin A, Berton-Rigaud D, Madry R, Reinthaller A, Hazard S, Guo W, Mirza M. Safety and dose modification for patients receiving niraparib. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:1784-1792. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
|
13
|
Hadar T, Mor P, Amit G, Lieberman S, Tahover E, Rosengarten O, Carmon M, Olsha O, Abu Dalo R, Michaelson-Cohen R, Golomb E, Rabinovitch R, Levy-Lahad E. Impact of germline BRCA identification on subsequent breast cancer stage and therapy: Implications for routine screening. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.1584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Hadar
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Pnina Mor
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Gefen Amit
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | - Oded Olsha
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Evron E, Ben David MA, Goldberg H, Fried G, Kaufman B, Catane R, Pfeffer R, Geffen D, Karni T, Abdah-Bortnyak R, Rosengarten O, Matceyevsky D, Inbar MJ, Kuten A, Corn BW. Phase II national clinical trial of prophylactic irradiation to the contralateral breast for BRCA mutation carriers treated for early breast cancer (EBC). J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ella Evron
- Assaf Harofeh Medical institution, Zerifin, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David Geffen
- Department of Oncology, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheba, Israel
| | - Tami Karni
- Assaf Harofeh Medical institution, Zerifin, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stemmer SM, Rizel S, Steiner M, Geffen DB, Soussan-Gutman L, Bareket-Samish A, McCullough D, Svedman C, Nisenbaum B, Ryvo L, Peretz T, Fried G, Rosengarten O, Liebermann N, Ben Baruch N. Abstract P1-07-14: Real-life analysis evaluating >1000 N0/N1mi estrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer patients for whom treatment decisions incorporated the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) result: Clinical outcomes with median follow up of > 9 years. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p1-07-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) Assay (Oncotype DX®) is a validated prognosticator and predictive of chemotherapy (CT) benefit in patients with hormone receptor (HR)+ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. In Israel, the RS assay has been reimbursed by Clalit Health Services (CHS, the largest HMO in Israel) since 2006, and the assay is widely used in eligible estrogen receptor (ER)+ patients. Notably, ER+ breast cancer patients have a protracted risk of recurrence with approximately half of all distant recurrences occurring after 5 years from diagnosis. The goal of the current ongoing analysis was to investigate early (≤5 years) and late (>5 years) distant recurrence in N0/N1mi ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer patients who were RS-tested through CHS.
Methods: This analysis of the CHS registry included breast cancer patients with ER+ HER2-negative N0/N1mi disease who underwent RS testing from 1/2006 (CHS approval of the assay) through 1/2009. Data sources included CHS claims arms (for patient/tumor characteristics), Teva Pharmaceuticals (for tumor characteristics, RS result), and medical records (for treatment/recurrence/survival). The study was approved by the institutional review boards of the CHS Community Division and was granted a waiver for obtaining patient consent.
Results: The analysis included 1026 patients with median (interquartile range) follow up of 9.3 (8.8-10.2) years. Most patients were females (99%). Median (range) age was 59 (25-84) years; 92% had N0 and 8% had N1mi disease; 14%, 52%, and 16% had grade 1, 2, and 3 tumors, respectively (grade information was not available for 18% of patients); median (range) tumor size was 1.5 (0.3-6.5) cm. The majority of patients (78%) had invasive ductal carcinoma and 12% had invasive lobular carcinoma. Overall, 489 patients (48%) had RS<18, 434 (42%) had RS 18-30, and 103 (10%) had RS≥31. The use of adjuvant CT was consistent with the RS result: 3%, 27%, and 90% of RS<18, RS 18-30, and RS≥31 patients, respectively. Overall, 25 distant recurrences were reported within 5 years of RS testing: 5 (1.0%) in RS<18 patients, 9 (2.1%) in RS 18-30 patients, and 11 (10.6%) in RS≥31 patients. In the first 5 years, breast cancer-specific death was reported in 8 patients including 3 (0.7%) with RS 18-30 and 5 (4.9%) with RS≥31 results. Among N0 patients with RS 11-25 who did not receive adjuvant CT (n = 540), 5 (0.9%) distant recurrences and one (0.2%) breast cancer death were reported within 5 years of RS testing. Analysis of 'late' recurrences and breast cancer-specific death (from 5 to 9.3 years of follow-up) is ongoing.
Conclusions: These will be the first late recurrence data from over 1000 patients for whom the RS result was used in real-life clinical decision making. Consistent with previous analyses of the CHS registry, CT use was appropriately based on the RS result, and the recurrence/survival outcomes (for the first 5 years) demonstrated the prognostic performance of the RS. Distant recurrence and breast cancer death data beyond 5 years will be presented at the meeting.
Citation Format: Stemmer SM, Rizel S, Steiner M, Geffen DB, Soussan-Gutman L, Bareket-Samish A, McCullough D, Svedman C, Nisenbaum B, Ryvo L, Peretz T, Fried G, Rosengarten O, Liebermann N, Ben Baruch N. Real-life analysis evaluating >1000 N0/N1mi estrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer patients for whom treatment decisions incorporated the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) result: Clinical outcomes with median follow up of > 9 years [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-14.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SM Stemmer
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - S Rizel
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - M Steiner
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - DB Geffen
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - L Soussan-Gutman
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - A Bareket-Samish
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - D McCullough
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - C Svedman
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - B Nisenbaum
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - L Ryvo
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - T Peretz
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - G Fried
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - O Rosengarten
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - N Liebermann
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - N Ben Baruch
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Lin Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Oncotest Division, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Shoham, Israel; BioInsight Ltd, Zichron Yaakov, Israel; Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel; Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stemmer SM, Steiner M, Rizel S, Soussan-Gutman L, Ben-Baruch N, Bareket-Samish A, Geffen DB, Nisenbaum B, Isaacs K, Fried G, Rosengarten O, Uziely B, Svedman C, McCullough D, Maddala T, Klang SH, Zidan J, Ryvo L, Kaufman B, Evron E, Karminsky N, Goldberg H, Shak S, Liebermann N. Clinical outcomes in patients with node-negative breast cancer treated based on the recurrence score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry. NPJ Breast Cancer 2017; 3:33. [PMID: 28900633 PMCID: PMC5591181 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-017-0034-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Revised: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 06/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The 21-gene Recurrence Score® (RS) assay is a validated prognostic/predictive tool in ER + early-stage breast cancer. However, clinical outcome data from prospective studies in RS ≥ 11 patients are lacking, as are relevant real-life clinical practice data. In this retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed registry, we evaluated treatments/clinical outcomes in patients undergoing RS-testing through Clalit Health Services. The analysis included N0 ER + HER2-negative breast cancer patients who were RS-tested from 1/2006 through 12/2010. Medical records were reviewed to verify treatments/recurrences/survival. The cohort included 1801 patients (median follow-up, 6.2 years). Median age was 60 years, 50.4% were grade 2 and 81.1% had invasive ductal carcinoma; 48.9% had RS < 18, 40.7% RS 18-30, and 10.4% RS ≥ 31, with chemotherapy use of 1.4, 23.7, and 87.2%, respectively. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for distant recurrence were 0.8, 3.0, and 8.6%, for patients with RS < 18, RS 18-30 and RS ≥ 31, respectively; the corresponding 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for breast cancer death were 0.0, 0.9, and 6.2%. Chemotherapy-untreated patients with RS < 11 (n = 304) and 11-25 (n = 1037) (TAILORx categorization) had 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for distant recurrence risk/breast cancer death of 1.0%/0.0% and 1.3%/0.4%, respectively. Our results extend those of the prospective TAILORx trial: the 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for distant recurrence and breast cancer death rate for the RS < 18 patients were very low supporting the use of endocrine therapy alone. Furthermore, in chemotherapy-untreated patients with RS 11-25 (where TAILORx patients were randomized to chemoendocrine or endocrine therapy alone), 5-year distant recurrence rates were also very low, suggesting that chemotherapy would not have conferred clinically meaningful benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salomon M. Stemmer
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Jabotinski St., Petah Tikva, 49414 Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Shulamith Rizel
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Jabotinski St., Petah Tikva, 49414 Israel
| | | | | | | | - David B. Geffen
- Department of Oncology, Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | | | - Kevin Isaacs
- Oncology Dept., Ha’emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Georgeta Fried
- Oncology Dept., Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ora Rosengarten
- Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Beatrice Uziely
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Shmuel H. Klang
- Community Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel
- The Hebrew University, Faculty of Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Jamal Zidan
- Oncology Dept., Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Larisa Ryvo
- Oncology Dept., Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Bella Kaufman
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Oncology Dept., Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Ella Evron
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Oncology Dept., Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel
| | | | - Hadassah Goldberg
- Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel
- Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stemmer SM, Steiner M, Rizel S, Ben Baruch N, Geffen DB, Soussan-Gutman L, Bareket-Samish A, Nisenbaum B, Isaacs K, Fried G, Rosengarten O, Uziely B, Svedman C, McCullough D, Klang S, Evron E, Karminsky N, Goldberg H, Shak S, Liebermann N. Treatments/clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) where treatment decisions were recurrence score (RS)-guided: Analysis by histologic subtype. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e12053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e12053 Background: The RS assay is widely used to guide treatment decisions in ER+ HER2-negative early BC regardless of tumor histology. However, the RS validation studies did not include an analysis by histologic subtype. We investigated treatments/clinical outcomes in RS-tested Clalit Health Services (CHS) patients (pts) by histologic subtype, focusing on invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Methods: This exploratory analysis of the CHS cohort included BC pts with N0/N1mi/N1 disease who were RS-tested from 1/2006 through 12/2010 (N0) or 12/2011 (N1mi/N1). Data from medical records were analyzed to assess risks of distant recurrence and BC death by histologic subtype. Results: The cohort included 2510 pts: 2060 (82%) IDC, 298 (12%) ILC, and 152 (6%) unknown/others. Median follow up for IDC/ILC pts was 6.0/6.1 yrs. Median age in IDC/ILC pts was 60/62 yrs; median tumor size was 1.5/1.8 cm; 71%/71% were N0, and 29%/29% were N1mi/N1. RS distribution (<18, 18-30, ≥31) was 50%, 39%, and 11%, respectively for IDC pts and 48%, 48%, and 4%, respectively, for ILC pts. Chemotherapy (CT) use for each RS group was similar between IDC and ILC pts; 5-yr Kaplan-Meier estimates for the risk of distant recurrence and BC death differed significantly across RS groups in both IDC and ILC; clinical outcomes for IDC and ILC pts were similar within risk groups see Table. Conclusions: For both IDC and ILC pts, treatment was aligned with the RS results. Within each RS group, there was no difference in clinical outcomes between these histologic subtypes, however the number of pts with ILC and RS≥31 was limited. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - David B Geffen
- Soroka University Medical Center/Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | - Georgeta Fried
- Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | | | - Beatrice Uziely
- Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Ella Evron
- Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stemmer SM, Steiner M, Rizel S, Ben Baruch N, Soussan-Gutman L, Bareket-Samish A, Nisenbaum B, Isaacs K, Fried G, Rosengarten O, Peretz T, Svedman C, McCullough D, Klang S, Zidan J, Ryvo L, Kaufman B, Shak S, Liebermann N, Geffen DB. Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) where treatment decisions incorporated the 21-gene recurrence score (RS): Elderly (≥70 yrs) vs younger patients (Pts). J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
543 Background: Elderly BC pts are generally undertreated, despite evidence suggesting that they may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). We compared treatments/clinical outcomes in elderly vs younger Clalit Health Services (CHS) pts undergoing RS testing. Methods: This exploratory analysis of the CHS registry included BC pts with N0/N1mi/N1 disease who were RS-tested from 1/2006 (CHS approval of the test) through 12/2010 (N0) or 12/2011 (N1mi/N1). Medical records were reviewed to verify treatments/recurrences/survival. Results: The analysis included 458 elderly and 2052 younger pts, with a median (range) follow-up of 5.7 (0.9-9.6) and 6.1 (0.1-10.3) yrs, respectively. In the elderly/younger pts, median age was 73/58 yrs, 48%/52% had grade 2 tumors, median tumor size was 1.6/1.5 cm, 70%/72% were N0 and 30%/28% were N1mi/N1. RS distribution (<18, 18-30, ≥31) among elderly pts was 56%, 33%, and 11%, respectively, compared to 49%, 41%, and 10%, respectively, in younger pts. In pts with RS 18-30 and RS≥31, CT use was significantly lower in the elderly ( P<.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates for 5-yr distant recurrence and BC death risk are presented (Table). Conclusions: In elderly pts, the proportion of those with RS≥31 was very similar to younger pts; however, overall CT use was significantly lower. Within each RS group, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes between the age groups; though, numerically, in RS 18-30 pts, outcomes were worse in the elderly. In pts with RS<18, outcomes were excellent regardless of age and despite very low rates of CT use. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Georgeta Fried
- Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | | | - Tamar Peretz
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Jamal Zidan
- Ziv Medical Center affiliated with Faculty of Medicine (Bar Ilan University), Safed, Israel
| | - Larisa Ryvo
- Tel Aviv Sorasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | | | - David B Geffen
- Soroka University Medical Center/Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Karam A, Ledermann J, Kim JW, Sehouli J, Lu K, Gourley C, Katsumata N, Burger R, Nam BH, Bacon M, Ng C, Pfisterer J, Bekkers R, Casado Herráez A, Redondo A, Fujiwara H, Gleeson N, Rosengarten O, Scambia G, Zhu J, Okamoto A, Stuart G, Ochiai K. Fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup: first-line interventions. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:711-717. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
20
|
Stemmer S, Steiner M, Rizel S, Geffen D, Nisenbaum B, Peretz T, Isaacs K, Rosengarten O, Fried G, Svedman C, Ben-Baruch N. Clinical outcomes following Recurrence Score-based therapy in N+ ER+ breast cancer: a cohort study. Breast 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(17)30337-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
21
|
Mirza M, Monk B, Oza A, Mahner S, Redondo A, Fabbro M, Ledermann J, Lorusso D, Vergote I, Rosengarten O, Berek J, Herrstedt J, Tinker A, Dubois A, Martin AG, Follana P, Benigno B, Rimel B, Agarwal S, Matulonis U. gynaecological cancers A randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial of maintenance therapy with niraparib vs placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial). Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw435.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
22
|
Stemmer S, Steiner M, Rizel S, Geffen D, Nisenbaum B, Peretz T, Soussan-Gutman L, Bareket-Samish A, Isaacs K, Rosengarten O, Fried G, Svedman C, Shak S, Liebermann N, Ben-Baruch N. First prospectively-designed outcome study in estrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) with N1mi or 1-3 positive nodes in whom treatment decisions in clinical practice incorporated the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) result. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw364.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
23
|
Domchek SM, Aghajanian C, Shapira-Frommer R, Schmutzler RK, Audeh MW, Friedlander M, Balmaña J, Mitchell G, Fried G, Stemmer SM, Hubert A, Rosengarten O, Loman N, Robertson JD, Mann H, Kaufman B. Efficacy and safety of olaparib monotherapy in germline BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with advanced ovarian cancer and three or more lines of prior therapy. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 140:199-203. [PMID: 26723501 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 221] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2015] [Revised: 12/14/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The efficacy and safety of olaparib, an oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, was investigated in a subgroup of patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutated (gBRCA1/2m) advanced ovarian cancer who had received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy. Primary data from this Phase II study (Study 42, ClinicalTrials.govNCT01078662) have been reported previously. METHODS Eligible patients were treated with oral olaparib 400mg bid capsule monotherapy until disease progression according to RECIST v1.1. Objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR) were assessed for patients with measurable disease at baseline. Safety and tolerability were assessed for all patients by adverse event (AE) incidence and changes in laboratory parameters. Platinum resistance status was obtained retrospectively, and responses to olaparib evaluated. RESULTS In patients with gBRCA1/2m ovarian cancer, 154/193 (80%) had received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy, of whom 137/154 (89%) had measurable disease at baseline. ORR was 34% (46/137; 95% confidence interval [CI] 26-42) and median DoR was 7.9 (95% CI 5.6-9.6) months. ORR in platinum-resistant tumors was 30%. Median DoR for platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant disease was similar: 8.2months (95% CI 5.6-13.5) compared with 8.0months (4.8-14.8), respectively. Six of the 193 (3%) patients had an AE with an outcome of death. None of these AEs at time of occurrence was considered causally related to olaparib. CONCLUSION Following ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy, olaparib 400mg bid (capsule form) monotherapy demonstrated notable antitumor activity in patients with gBRCA1/2m advanced ovarian cancer. No new safety signals were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Domchek
- Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Michael Friedlander
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gillian Mitchell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Georgeta Fried
- Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | | | - Ayala Hubert
- Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital Sharett Institute of Oncology, Jerusalem, Israel; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Stemmer S, Steiner M, Rizel S, Ben-Baruch N, Soussan-Gutman L, Rosengarten O, Geffen D, Nisenbaum B, Ryvo L, Uziely B, Fried G, Svedman C, Rothney M, Klang S, Kaufman B, Isaacs K, Evron E, Zidan J, Shak S, Liebermann N. 1963 First prospective outcome data in 930 patients with more than 5 year median follow up in whom treatment decisions in clinical practice have been made incorporating the 21-Gene Recurrence Score. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)30911-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
25
|
Domchek SM, Shapira-Frommer R, Schmutzler RK, Audeh MW, Friedlander M, Balmaña J, Mitchell G, Fried G, Stemmer SM, Hubert A, Rosengarten O, Loman N, Robertson JD, Mann H, Kaufman B. Efficacy and safety of olaparib monotherapy in a subgroup of patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation and advanced ovarian cancer from a Phase II open-label study. J Clin Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.5529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M. Domchek
- Basser Research Center for BRCA at the Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Georgeta Fried
- Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | | | - Ayala Hubert
- Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Helen Mann
- AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom
| | - Bella Kaufman
- Sheba Medical Center; affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine (Tel Aviv Univ), Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Safra T, Rosengarten O, Korach J, Koren C, Siegelmann-Danieli N, Ben Baruch N, Merose R, Shpigel S, Beiner M, Greenberg J, Chmielecki J, Chalmers Z, Elvin JA, Stephens P, Dvir A, Miller VA, Ross JS, Soussan-Gutman L, Ali SM. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of gynecologic malignancies in Israeli population to reveal potentially clinically relevant genomic alterations and opportunities for targeted therapies. J Clin Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e16578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar Safra
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | - Noa Ben Baruch
- Department of Oncology, Kaplan Medical Center,Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School,, Rehovot, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Julia Greenberg
- Department of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | - Addie Dvir
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Shoham, Israel
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Grenader T, Plotkin Y, Rosengarten O. [Intravenous vinorelbine as first line chemotherapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer]. Harefuah 2014; 153:731-752. [PMID: 25654915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Docetaxel-based chemotherapy remains the treatment of choice in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Generally, elderly patients poorly tolerate these drugs. Vinorelbine has a favolable toxicity profile and may be useful in elderly or unfit patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. PURPOSE The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vinorelbine in patients with CRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed the medical records of patients with CRPC treated in our institution with intravenous vinorelbine as first line chemotherapy. RESULTS A total of 25 patients were assessable for efficacy. The median age was 73 years (range, 51-87 years); 9 out of 25 patients (36%) had a > 50% reduction in PSA levels from baseline. Mean progression-free survival was 7.2 months. Mean overall survival was 20.7 months. Mean overall survival for 11 patients treated with second-line taxane-based chemotherapy was 27.5 months compared to 16.8 months for patients who did not receive second-line chemotherapy. Treatment was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION On the basis of this small retrospective survey, we conclude that intravenous vinorelbine seems to be a therapeutic option in elderly or unfit patients with CRPC.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kaufman B, Shapira-Frommer R, Schmutzler RK, Audeh MW, Friedlander M, Balmaña J, Mitchell G, Fried G, Stemmer SM, Hubert A, Rosengarten O, Steiner M, Loman N, Bowen K, Fielding A, Domchek SM. Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 2014; 33:244-50. [PMID: 25366685 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.56.2728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1232] [Impact Index Per Article: 123.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Olaparib is an oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor with activity in germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) -associated breast and ovarian cancers. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of olaparib in a spectrum of BRCA1/2-associated cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter phase II study enrolled individuals with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation and recurrent cancer. Eligibility included ovarian cancer resistant to prior platinum; breast cancer with ≥ three chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease; pancreatic cancer with prior gemcitabine treatment; or prostate cancer with progression on hormonal and one systemic therapy. Olaparib was administered at 400 mg twice per day. The primary efficacy end point was tumor response rate. RESULTS A total of 298 patients received treatment and were evaluable. The tumor response rate was 26.2% (78 of 298; 95% CI, 21.3 to 31.6) overall and 31.1% (60 of 193; 95% CI, 24.6 to 38.1), 12.9% (eight of 62; 95% CI, 5.7 to 23.9), 21.7% (five of 23; 95% CI, 7.5 to 43.7), and 50.0% (four of eight; 95% CI, 15.7 to 84.3) in ovarian, breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancers, respectively. Stable disease ≥ 8 weeks was observed in 42% of patients (95% CI, 36.0 to 47.4), including 40% (95% CI, 33.4 to 47.7), 47% (95% CI, 34.0 to 59.9), 35% (95% CI, 16.4 to 57.3), and 25% (95% CI, 3.2 to 65.1) of those with ovarian, breast, pancreatic, or prostate cancer, respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported for 54% of patients; anemia was the most common (17%). CONCLUSION Responses to olaparib were observed across different tumor types associated with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Olaparib warrants further investigation in confirmatory studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bella Kaufman
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ronnie Shapira-Frommer
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - M William Audeh
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael Friedlander
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Gillian Mitchell
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Georgeta Fried
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Salomon M Stemmer
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ayala Hubert
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ora Rosengarten
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mariana Steiner
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Niklas Loman
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Karin Bowen
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Anitra Fielding
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Bella Kaufman and Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer; Georgeta Fried, Institute of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus; Mariana Steiner, Linn Medical Centre, Haifa; Salomon M. Stemmer, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Ayala Hubert, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Sharett Institute of Oncology; Ora Rosengarten, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Rita K. Schmutzler, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; M. William Audeh, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales; Gillian Mitchell, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Judith Balmaña, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Niklas Loman, Skånes Universitetssjuk Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karin Bowen and Anitra Fielding, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and Susan M. Domchek, Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Grenader T, Rosengarten O, Isacson R, Plotkin Y, Gabizon A. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/carboplatin combination in ovarian cancer, progressing on single-agent pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. World J Clin Oncol 2012; 3:137-141. [PMID: 23198277 PMCID: PMC3509111 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v3.i10.137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and carboplatin in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma (ROC), following disease progression on single agent PLD.
METHODS: An analysis of the medical records of 10 patients with ROC, treated in our institution with a combination of PLD and carboplatin following progression on single-agent PLD therapy was performed. The median age was 59.1 years (range, 45 to 77 years). All diagnoses were histological-proven. Eight of the 10 patients were platinum-resistant. Following disease progression on single-agent PLD treatment, carboplatin area under the curve (AUC)-5 was added to PLD in all 10 patients. In order to assess disease status, Ca-125 was assessed before each PLD/carboplatin treatment. Relative changes in Ca-125 values were calculated, and response defined as a greater than 50% reduction in Ca-125 from baseline. Radiographic studies were re-evaluated and responses to therapy based on computer tomography (CT) scans carried out on a regular basis every 2-3 mo in each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (V19).
RESULTS: A median of 10 cycles (range, 2-26) of the carboplatin-PLD combination was given. Of the 10 treated patients, 6 had > 50% reduction in Ca-125 levels from baseline, 4 of these had a partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and the other 2 patients had no measurable disease. In a further 2 patients with a best response of disease stabilization and < 50% reduction of Ca-125 levels, one had progression of disease after 26 cycles, and the second progressed with brain metastases following 12 cycles. Seven of the eight patients who were platinum-resistant showed evidence of clinical benefit on carboplatin-PLD combination therapy; 5 of these had > 50% reduction in Ca-125 level, 4 also showed a partial response on CT scan. The treatment was generally well-tolerated by the patients.
CONCLUSION: Addition of carboplatin to PLD, after disease progression on single-agent PLD therapy, is both effective and safe in patients with ROC, even in those with Platinum-resistant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Grenader
- Tal Grenader, Ora Rosengarten, Rut Isacson, Yevgeni Plotkin, Alberto Gabizon, Department of Oncology, Sha'are Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 91031, Israel
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kwa M, Baumgartner R, Shavit L, Barash I, Michael J, Puzanov I, Kopolovic J, Rosengarten O, Blank S, Curtin JP, Gabizon A, Muggia F. Is renal thrombotic angiopathy an emerging problem in the treatment of ovarian cancer recurrences? Oncologist 2012; 17:1534-40. [PMID: 22622146 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Ovarian cancer is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage, with most patients undergoing surgery followed by platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy. After initial clinical remission, the majority recur, leading to additional treatments, including not only platinums and taxanes but also pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), gemcitabine, topotecan, and, more recently, bevacizumab, which may extend survival times. PLD, in particular, has been extensively studied by our group, with encouraging therapeutic results. We, however, observed instances of chronic kidney disease (CKD) developing among patients who received long-term treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer. To document the frequency and contributing factors to the emergence of CKD, we initiated a retrospective review at two institutions. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-six consecutive patients with recurrent ovarian cancer receiving treatment at New York University Cancer Institute were reviewed for the presence of renal disease in 1997-2010. At Shaare Zedek Medical Center, 73 consecutive patients with ovarian cancer were reviewed in 2002-2010. Patients were diagnosed with CKD if they had an estimated GFR <60 mL/minute per 1.73 m2 for >3 months and were staged according to the National Kidney Foundation guidelines. RESULTS Thirteen patients (23%) developed stage ≥3 CKD. Three patients had renal biopsies performed that showed thrombotic microangiopathy. CONCLUSIONS CKD is emerging as a potential long-term consequence of current chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryann Kwa
- NYU Clinical Cancer Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kwa M, Baumgartner RA, Shavit L, Barash I, Michael J, Puzanov I, Kopolovic J, Rosengarten O, Hung A, Jones H, Gabizon A, Muggia F. Treatment-related microangiopathic glomerulopathy and severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (rEOC): A possible relationship with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.e15551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
32
|
Lowery M, Shah MA, Smyth E, Epstein A, Segal A, Rosengarten O, Isacson R, Drukker L, Keinan A, Rachkiman M, Reissman P, Gabizon A, Kelsen D, O’Reilly EM. A 67-Year-Old Woman with BRCA 1 Mutation Associated with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Cancer 2010; 42:160-4. [DOI: 10.1007/s12029-010-9197-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
33
|
Grenader T, Isacson R, Reinus C, Rosengarten O, Barenholz O, Hyman J, Gabizon A, Beller U. Primary amelanotic melanoma of the vagina. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008; 31:474-6. [PMID: 18787356 DOI: 10.1159/000142398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary malignant melanoma of the vagina is extremely rare, accounting for 0.3-0.8% of all malignant melanomas. True amelanotic vaginal melanoma showing no melanin on histological examination is exceedingly rare, accounting for only 2% of all vaginal melanomas. CASE REPORT We describe a 31-year-old female patient who presented with locally advanced amelanotic melanoma of the vagina, with no evidence of metastatic spread on the computerized tomography (CT) scan, but who was subsequently diagnosed as suffering from metastatic disease by positron emission tomography (PET)-CT performed a few weeks following posterior pelvic exenteration. CONCLUSION Specific immunohistochemical staining with melanoma markers should be performed to confirm or exclude a diagnosis of amelanotic melanoma in all patients presenting with a vaginal mass composed of undifferentiated epithelioid malignant cells. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET-CT should be performed as part of the preoperative evaluation, to identify the presence or absence of metastatic disease in all patients with vaginal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Grenader
- Department of Oncology, Sha'are Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gabizon A, Isacson R, Rosengarten O, Tzemach D, Shmeeda H, Sapir R. An open-label study to evaluate dose and cycle dependence of the pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2007; 61:695-702. [PMID: 17549475 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-007-0525-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2007] [Accepted: 05/11/2007] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are no definitive data in humans on the dose dependence and/or cycle dependence of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). This study examined the PK of PLD across a twofold dose variation and along 3 cycles. METHODS Fifteen patients received PLD in successive doses of 60, 30, and 45 mg/m(2) (Arm A) and 30, 60, and 45 mg/m(2) (Arm B), every 4 weeks. Twelve patients, six on each arm, completed all three cycles and were fully evaluable. Plasma levels of doxorubicin were analyzed by HPLC and fluorimetry. PK analysis was done by non-compartmental method. Repeated measures ANOVA and paired tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the PK parameters examined when the dose was increased from 30 to 60 mg/m(2). However, when we analyzed the effect of cycle number on the PK, we found a gradual and significant inhibition of clearance (P < 0.0001) from the 1st through the 3rd cycle of PLD, with a geometric mean increase of 43% in dose-normalized AUC (P = 0.0003). Dose-normalized C(max) and T(1/2) mean values increased by 17 and 18%, respectively between the 1st and 3rd cycles, but only the increase in T(1/2) was statistically significant (P = 0.0017). CONCLUSIONS While the PK of PLD is not dose-dependent within the dose range of 30-60 mg/m(2), there is evidence of a cycle-dependent effect that results in inhibition of clearance when patients receive successive cycles of PLD. These results suggest the need for dose adjustments of PLD upon retreatment to minimize the risk of toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Gabizon
- Department of Oncology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, POB 3235, Jerusalem, 91031, Israel.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gabizon A, Isacson R, Rosengarten O, Tzemach D, Shmeeda H, Sapir R. An open-label study to evaluate dose and cycle dependence of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.2012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2012 Background: There are no definitive data in humans on the dose dependency and/or cycle dependency of the pharmacokinetics of PLD. The skin toxicity of PLD tends to worsen after several treatment cycles. Therefore, it is important to characterize the PK of PLD after 2 or more cycles. Methods: Fifteen patients with various solid tumors were randomized to two arms of treatment in an open-label study. Arm A received PLD at doses of 60, 30, and 45 mg/m2 in 3 successive cycles every 4 weeks (q4w). Arm B received PLD at doses of 30, 60, and 45 mg/m2 in 3 successive cycles q4w. Twelve patients, 6 on each arm, completed all three cycles and were fully evaluable. Plasma levels of doxorubicin were analyzed by HPLC and fluorimetry following a previously published method (J Chromatogr B, 779:259–69, 2002) with minor modifications. PK analysis was done by non-compartmental method. The following parameters were obtained: Cmax, AUC∞, terminal half-life (T1/2), and Clearance (CL). The paired t test was used for statistical analysis. Results: There was no significant difference in the parameters examined when the dose was increased from 30 to 60 mg/m2. However, when we analyzed the effect of cycle number on the PK, we found a gradual and significant inhibition of CL when patients advance from the 1st through the 3rd cycle of PLD (p=0.0003), with a mean increase of 44% in AUC/mg dose (p=0.0011). Cmax and T1/2 mean values increased by 17% and 18% respectively between the 1st and 3rd cycles, but only the increase in T1/2 was statistically significant (p=0.0127). Conclusion: While the PK of PLD is not dose-dependent within the dose range of 30 to 60mg/m2, there is evidence of a cycle-dependent effect that results in inhibition of CL when patients receive successive cycles of PLD. This effect may account for the delayed skin toxicity of PLD. These results suggest the need for dose adjustments of PLD to minimize the risk of toxicity, such as an initial high loading dose followed by reduced maintenance doses from the 2nd or 3rd cycle onwards. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Gabizon
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - R. Isacson
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - D. Tzemach
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - H. Shmeeda
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - R. Sapir
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Carmon M, Cherny N, Olsha O, Spira R, Isacson R, Alberton J, Rivkin L, Abu-Dalo R, Rosengarten O, Beller U. The “Sentinel Chain”: Involvement pattern in patients with multiple sentinel nodes can predict non-sentinel node involvement in breast cancer patients. EJC Suppl 2004. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(04)90694-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
37
|
Isacson R, Hubert A, Kaduri L, Lyass O, Queralt B, Rosengarten O. Metast, malig, melanoma (M. M. M.): Prelim, results of a trial with carboplatin (CB), cis-platinum (DDP), dacarbazine (DTIC), interferon-α (IFNα) and tamoxifen (TAM). Eur J Cancer 1993. [DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(93)91630-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|