Genomic Methods Identify Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Pancreas Adenocarcinoma and Optimize Treatment Selection

Breast, Colorectal, and Pancreatic Cancer Mortality With Pathogenic Variants in ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2

PURPOSE

Oncologists encounter patients with pathogenic variants (PVs) in ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2, but little is known about their cancer mortality.

METHODS

Patients who were 20 years or older, diagnosed in 2013-2019 with breast, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer, and reported to SEER registries in California and Georgia were linked to germline genetic testing results from four clinical laboratories and followed through 2021. Multivariable models of cancer mortality were fit; for each cancer, the reference group was the average hazard across all genetically tested patients with that diagnosis. Each cancer was modeled separately, followed by a single model that interacted the cancer type with all covariates. In addition to fixed effects models, random effects models were used as a regularization approach to reduce overfitting.

RESULTS

A total of 70,272 tested patients with breast (48,473 estrogen receptor-/progesterone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative; 9,957 HER2-positive; 11,842 triple-negative) cancer, 5,822 with colorectal cancer, and 1,861 with pancreatic cancer were analyzed; the mean follow-up was 3.9 years. Patients with ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 PVs had no differences in breast, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer mortality. Patients with ATM PVs in triple-negative breast cancer appeared to have higher mortality in fixed effects models (hazard ratio [HR], 3.7 [95% CI, 1.8 to 7.8]), but not in random effects models (HR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8 to 1.6]) that reduce overfitting. Patients with BRCA1/2 PVs had lower triple-negative breast cancer mortality in both models (fixed HR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9], random HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6 to 0.8]). Patients with Lynch syndrome gene PVs had lower colorectal cancer mortality in both models (fixed HR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.4 to 0.8], random HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9]).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 PVs had similar breast, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer mortality to the average genetically tested patient with their cancer type.

Current status of cancer genome medicine for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis; however, advancements in cancer genome profiling using next-generation sequencing have provided new perspectives. KRAS mutations are the most frequently observed genomic alterations in patients with PDAC. However, until recently, it was not considered a viable therapeutic target. Although KRAS G12C mutations for which targeted therapies are already available are infrequent in PDAC, treatments targeting KRAS G12D and pan-KRAS are still under development. Similarly, new treatment methods for KRAS, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, have been developed. Several other potential therapeutic targets have been identified for KRAS wild-type PDAC. For instance, immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in PDAC treatment with microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair and tumor mutation burden-high profiles. However, for other PDAC cases with low immunogenicity, combination therapies that enhance the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors are being considered. Additionally, homologous recombination repair deficiencies, including BRCA1/2 mutations, are prevalent in PDAC and serve as important biomarkers for therapies involving poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and platinum-based therapies. Currently, olaparib is available for maintenance therapy of BRCA1/2 mutation-positive PDAC. Further therapeutic developments are ongoing for genetic abnormalities involving BRAF V600E and the fusion genes RET, NTRK, NRG, ALK, FGFR2, and ROS1. Overcoming advanced PDAC remains a formidable challenge; however, this review outlines the latest therapeutic strategies that are expected to lead to significant advancements.

Identification of DNA damage and repair gene-related markers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing

BACKGROUND

The DNA damage response (DDR) has a major impact on the development and progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Investigating biomarkers linked to the DDR may facilitate prognostic assessment and prediction of immunological characteristics for patients with PDAC.

METHODS

The single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) dataset GSE212966 was obtained from the GEO database, whereas the bulk RNA-seq data were sourced from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and univariate Cox regression analyses were used to select genes to construct a prognostic risk model. Finally, the correlations of the model score with drug sensitivity, immunological checkpoints, and immune infiltration were assessed.

RESULTS

We used 16 DDR marker genes to construct a predictive model. Furthermore, we established that the model had strong performance in both the training and validation cohorts. For PDAC, the model risk score served as an independent predictor of prognosis. There were notable differences in the proportions of the immune cells in the tumor microenvironment and drug sensitivity between the high and low risk score groups. The study confirmed that the risk score model is useful for predicting the immunotherapy response. Our experiments verified that knockdown of LY6D inhibits cell proliferation, promotes apoptosis and DNA damage.

CONCLUSION

Our creative integration of bulk RNA sequencing and scRNA-seq data allowed us to construct a DDR-related prognostic model. Our model can be used to predict the immunological features, treatment response and prognosis of PDAC with a relatively high degree of accuracy.

The tandem duplicator phenotype may be a novel targetable subgroup in pancreatic cancer

Tandem duplicator phenotype (TDP) consists of distinct genomic rearrangements where tandem duplications are randomly distributed. In this study, we characterized the prevalence and outcomes of TDP in a large series of prospectively sequenced tumors from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC). Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed in 530 PDAC cases from the PanCuRx Initiative, COMPASS and PanGen/POG trials in Canada. Of 530 cases, 52 were identified as TDP (9.8%; 13 resected, 39 advanced). Etiological subgroups of TDP included BRCA1 (n = 9), CCNE1 (n = 4), and unknown (n = 39). Presence of TDP was not prognostic in resected specimens (p = 0.77) compared with non-HRD and non-TDP cases, described as typicals. In advanced cases, when stratified for only classical subtype cases, platinum therapy was correlated with longer response in non-BRCA1 TDP vs. typicals (p = 0.0036). There was no difference in overall survival between TDP and typicals (p = 0.5).TDP represents a potential novel targetable subgroup for chemotherapy selection in PDAC.

Clinical utility of comprehensive genomic profiling for advanced pancreatic cancer: insights from real-world data analysis

BACKGROUND

Precision medicine is a promising therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancer. However, only a few patients are eligible for genotype-matched treatments because of the low detection rate of actionable genomic alterations, and the clinical application of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in pancreatic cancer has not been completely investigated. CGP provides considerable information, including the prognosis and eligibility of patients for genotype-matched treatments, which can guide physicians' treatment strategies. This study aimed to investigate the contribution of CGP to patient outcomes.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with recurrent or metastatic pancreatic cancer with adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma who underwent systemic chemotherapy between April 2018 and April 2022. We reviewed the medical records for patient characteristics, survival, and genomic information. We compared overall survival (OS) between patients who received CGP (CGP group) and those who did not (non-CGP group).

RESULTS

Of 111 eligible patients, 59 underwent CGP. Median OS was significantly longer in the CGP than the non-CGP group (25.2 vs. 11.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.49; P = 0.0013). Six patients (10.2%) underwent genotype-matched treatments, with a median OS of 35.5 months, compared to 17.0 months for those who did not. The CGP group demonstrated a higher transition rate to subsequent chemotherapy than did the non-CGP group (76.3% vs. 48.1%, P = 0.0030).

CONCLUSIONS

OS was prolonged in patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent CGP, probably due to its influence on physicians' treatment strategies. These findings highlight the importance of the proactive and timely implementation of CGP in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer: failures and hopes-a review of new promising treatment approaches

Pancreatic cancer is a challenging disease with limited treatment options and a high mortality rate. Just few therapy advances have been made in recent years. Tumor microenvironment, immunosuppressive features and mutational status represent important obstacles in the improvement of survival outcomes. Up to now, first-line therapy did achieve a median overall survival of less than 12 months and this discouraging data lead clinicians all over the world to focus their efforts on various fields of investigation: 1) sequential cycling of different systemic therapy in order to overcome mechanisms of resistance; 2) discovery of new predictive bio-markers, in order to target specific patient population; 3) combination treatment, in order to modulate the tumor microenvironment of pancreatic cancer; 4) new modalities of the delivery of drugs in order to pass the physical barrier of desmoplasia and tumor stroma. This review shows future directions of treatment strategies in advanced pancreatic cancer through a deep analysis of these recent macro areas of research.

The Landscape of PARP Inhibitors in Solid Cancers

PARP inhibitors are a class of agents that have shown significant preclinical activity in models defective in homologous recombination (HR). The identification of synthetic lethality between HR defects and PARP inhibition led to several clinical trials in tumors with known HR defects (initially mutations in BRCA1/2 genes and subsequently in other genes involved in HR). These studies demonstrated significant responses in breast and ovarian cancers, which are known to have a significant proportion of patients with HR defects. Since the approval of the first PARP inhibitor (PARPi), olaparib, several other inhibitors have been developed, expanding the armamentarium available to clinicians in this setting. The positive results obtained in breast and ovarian cancer have expanded the use of PARPi in other solid tumors with HR defects, including prostate and pancreatic cancer in which these defects have been identified. The clinical trials have demonstrated responses to PARPi which are now also available for the subset of patients with prostate and pancreatic cancer with HR defects. This review summarizes the results obtained in solid tumors with PARPi and their potential use when combined with other agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors that are likely to further increase the survival of these patients which still needs a dramatic improvement.

Survival Outcomes and Genetic Characteristics of Resected Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (pACC) is a rare neoplasm of the exocrine pancreas. There is a dearth of information about tumor characteristics and patient outcomes. This study describes the clinical characteristics, genetic alterations, and survival outcomes of resected pACC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing pancreatectomy for pathologically confirmed pACC from 1999 to 2022 across three high-volume pancreas surgery centers were analyzed. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment data, and genetic sequencing were obtained through retrospective abstraction.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients with resected pACC were identified. Median overall survival (OS) was 73 months and median recurrence free survival was 22 months. Nine patients underwent resection for oligometastatic disease; median OS was not reached after a median follow-up of 31 months from date of metastasectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 67% of patients with FOLFOX/FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, ± irinotecan) the most common regimen (58%). Sequencing data were obtained in 47 (77%) patients. A mutation in at least one of three core genes associated with the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway (BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2) occurred in 26% (n = 12) with BRCA2 the most frequently identified. A mutation in any other "non-core" gene associated with DNA damage repair or the HRR pathway was identified in 45% (n = 21) with a high tumor mutational burden of > 10 mutations per megabase in 13%.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of pACC is associated with favorable survival outcomes, even in the setting of oligometastatic disease. Mutations in the HRR pathway are common, providing opportunities for potential targeted therapeutic options.

Clinicogenomic landscape of pancreatic adenocarcinoma identifies KRAS mutant dosage as prognostic of overall survival

Nearly all pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PDAC) are genomically characterized by KRAS exon 2 mutations. Most patients with PDAC present with advanced disease and are treated with cytotoxic therapy. Genomic biomarkers prognostic of disease outcomes have been challenging to identify. Herein leveraging a cohort of 2,336 patients spanning all disease stages, we characterize the genomic and clinical correlates of outcomes in PDAC. We show that a genomic subtype of KRAS wild-type tumors is associated with early disease onset, distinct somatic and germline features, and significantly better overall survival. Allelic imbalances at the KRAS locus are widespread. KRAS mutant allele dosage gains, observed in one in five (20%) KRAS-mutated diploid tumors, are correlated with advanced disease and demonstrate prognostic potential across disease stages. With the rapidly expanding landscape of KRAS targeting, our findings have potential implications for clinical practice and for understanding de novo and acquired resistance to RAS therapeutics.

Uridine-cytidine kinase 2 is correlated with immune, DNA damage repair and promotion of cancer stemness in pan-cancer

Background

UCK2 (Uridine-Cytidine Kinase 2) is a promising prognostic marker for malignant tumors, but its association with immune infiltration and cancer stemness in pan-cancer remains to be fully understood. we find that gene UCK2 is closed related to RNA stemness scores (RNAss) and DNA stemness scores (DNAss), which is measured the tumor stemness. We also discover an association between UCK2 expression and immune cells by CIBERSORT algorithm, ESTIMATE algorithm and ssGSEA algorithm, especially, related to T cell, monocytes, mast cells, and macrophages. This study aims to shed light on the role and possible mechanism of UCK2 in pan-cancer.

Methods

We used the R programming language for pan-cancer bulk sequencing data analysis, which were obtained from the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC) datasets. UCSC database is a very useful for explore data from TCGA and other cancer genomics datasets, The data we explored at the UCK2 transcriptome level came from TCGA data in the UCSC database. We explored differential UCK2 expression between tumor and normal samples. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was utilized to validate the expression of UCK2 in different types cancers using tumor tissue chips. The correlations of UCK2 with prognosis, genetic instability, DNA repair, cancer stem cell characteristics, and immune cell infiltration were investigated. Furthermore, single-cell datasets, acquired from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, were used to validate the relationship between UCK2 and immune cells. GEO is a famous public genomics database supporting freely disseminates microarray data. Finally, we analyzed the correlation between UCK2 and drug sensitivity.

Results

UCK2 expression was observed to be high in most cancers and was remarkably related to the prognosis of pan-cancers. We found that the increased UCK2 expression was associated with higher genetic instability. Additionally, positive relationships were observed between UCK2 expression and mismatch repair genes, homologous recombination repair genes, and cancer stemness across different cancer types. There were significant correlations between UCK2 and T cells, monocytes, mast cells, and macrophages. Moreover, as expected, the immune checkpoint human leucocyte antigen (HLA) was found to be negatively related to UCK2. Similarly, UCK2 was also observed to have a negative association with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes. We noted that UCK2 had significant correlations with the sensitivity to various anti-cancer drug.

Conclusion

We have observed that UCK2 plays pivotal roles in prognosis and tumor immunity, and it is associated with DNA repair and cancer stemness. The UCK2 gene exhibits a strong correlation with the immune checkpoints HLA. This study highlights its potential impact on drug sensitivity.

Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer: Advances in Genetic Testing, Early Detection Strategies, and Personalized Management

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy with a five-year survival rate of approximately 13% for advanced stages. While the majority of PDAC cases are sporadic, a significant subset is attributable to hereditary and familial predispositions, accounting for approximately 25% of cases. This article synthesizes recent advancements in the understanding, detection, and management of hereditary pancreatic cancer (PC). Results: Our review highlights the critical role of genetic testing (GT) in identifying high-risk individuals (HRIs), with germline pathogenic variants (PVs) found in up to 20% of hereditary PDAC cases. Since the implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels in 2014, detection capabilities have been significantly enhanced. HRIs can be included in screening programs that facilitate the early detection of PDAC. Early detection strategies, including the use of microribonucleic acid (miRNAs) signatures and novel imaging techniques like hyperpolarized 13C-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) have shown promising results. The identification of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) or mutations in homologous recombination (HR) genes plays a predictive role in the response to various treatments, prolonging patient survival. Discussion: Universal germline testing for PDAC, as recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), is now a standard practice, facilitating the identification of at-risk individuals and enabling targeted surveillance and intervention. Multidisciplinary management, integrating genetic counseling, imaging, and gastrointestinal services, is essential for optimizing outcomes. Conclusions: Advances in genetic testing and biomarker research are transforming the landscape of hereditary PC management. Early detection and personalized treatment strategies are pivotal in improving survival rates. Ongoing multi-institutional research efforts are crucial for validating biomarkers and developing preventive measures, ultimately aiming to reduce the burden of this aggressive cancer.

Clinical Outcomes and Molecular Profiling of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) is a rare and aggressive form of pancreatic cancer that originates in the acinar cells of the exocrine pancreas. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with PACC at our institution.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with PACC seen at Mayo Clinic between 2002 and 2023. Baseline patient characteristics, tumor pathology, treatment strategies used, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated using newsurv macros in SAS.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 65 patients with PACC. The median age at diagnosis was 66 years. Almost half of the patients (48%) presented with resectable/borderline-resectable disease (n = 28). Five-year overall survival (OS) for resectable/borderline-resectable, locally advanced/unresectable, and metastatic disease were 72.0%, 21.6%, and 20.9%, respectively. Somatic and germline next-generation sequencing identified numerous potentially actionable targets including homologous recombination (43% somatic, 33% germline), RAF alterations (29% somatic), and mismatch repair (14% somatic).

CONCLUSION

Our findings underscore the heterogeneity and aggressive nature of PACC. Despite the improved prognosis for patients with resectable/borderline-resectable disease, OS remains poor, particularly for those with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The identification of actionable molecular targets in a significant proportion of patients highlights the potential for personalized therapeutic approaches. Future research should focus on tailored treatment strategies to exploit these molecular vulnerabilities, which may offer new options for improving outcomes in this rare malignancy.

Regorafenib induces DNA damage and enhances PARP inhibitor efficacy in pancreatic ductal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in enhancing the response of the PARP inhibitor olaparib, which is currently approved for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with defects in DNA damage repair associated with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Moreover, agents that can mimic these defects in the absence of germline BRCA1/2 mutations are an area of active research in hopes of increasing the number of patients eligible for treatment with PARP inhibitors. The extent to which regorafenib, an FDA-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can be used to enhance the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in PDAC cells without known BRCA1/2 mutations remains to be investigated.

METHODS

Comet assay, cell cycle analysis, western blotting, and immunofluorescent detection of H2AXS139 were used to evaluate the extent to which regorafenib induces DNA damage in PDAC cell lines. The effects of regorafenib, either alone or in combination with PARPi inhibitors, on PDAC cell death were assessed by Annexin V/PI co-staining assay in cell lines and by immunohistochemistry staining for cleaved caspase-3 in mouse tumors and in ex vivo slice cultures of human PDAC tumors. Flow cytometry-based analysis was used to evaluate the ability of regorafenib to reprogram PDAC tumor microenvironment.

RESULTS

We now show that regorafenib, a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor with efficacy in several gastrointestinal malignancies, can enhance the response of olaparib in pancreatic cancer. While regorafenib induces DNA damage and limits the ability of PDAC cells to resolve the damage, regorafenib by itself does not induce apoptosis. However, regorafenib in combination with olaparib further induces DNA damage in vitro, in tumor-bearing mice, and in ex vivo slice cultures of human PDAC tumors, resulting in increased apoptosis compared to olaparib alone. Notably, we show that the efficacy of the combination treatment is not dependent on cytolytic T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, these findings demonstrate that regorafenib can attenuate DNA damage response and potentiate the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in PDAC tumors.

Phase II Trial of the PARP Inhibitor, Niraparib, in BAP1 and Other DNA Damage Response Pathway-Deficient Neoplasms

PURPOSE

BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) is a critical cell cycle and DNA damage response (DDR) regulator with mutations (mBAP1) causing a functional protein loss. PARP inhibitors (PARPis) demonstrate synthetic lethality in mBAP1 preclinical models, independent of underlying BRCA status. This study aimed to explore the clinical activity of niraparib in patients with advanced tumors likely to harbor mBAP1.

METHODS

This was a phase II multicenter trial in which refractory solid tumor patients were assigned to cohort A (histology-specific tumors likely to harbor mBAP1) or cohort B (histology-agnostic tumors with other known non-BRCA-confirmed DDR mutations). All patients received niraparib 300 mg orally once daily on a 28-day cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate, and secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.

RESULTS

From August 2018 through December 2021, 37 patients were enrolled with 31 evaluable for response (cohort A, n = 18; cohort B, n = 13). In cohort A, the best response was one partial response (PR; 6%), eight stable disease (SD; 44%), and nine progressive disease (PD; 50%). This cohort stopped at the first stage following the prespecified Simon's design. mBAP1 was confirmed in 7/9 patients (78%) with PR or SD but in only 3/9 (33%) in those with PD. The median PFS in patients with mBAP1 (n = 10) was 6.7 months (95% CI, 1.0 to 9.2) versus 1.8 months (95% CI, 0.9 to 4.5) for wild-type (n = 8; P = .020). In cohort B, the best response was six SD (46%) and seven PD (54%), with SD in those with ATM, CHEK2, PTEN, RAD50, and ARID1A mutations.

CONCLUSION

Niraparib failed to meet the prespecified efficacy end point for response. However, clinical benefit was suggested in a proportion of patients who had a confirmed mBAP1, supporting further investigation.

Real-world genome profiling in Japanese patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma focusing on HRD implications

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) poses significant challenges due to its high mortality, making it a critical area of research. This retrospective observational study aimed to analyze real-world data from comprehensive genome profiling (CGP) of Japanese patients with PDAC, mainly focusing on differences in gene detection rates among panels and the implications for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. This study enrolled 2568 patients with PDAC who had undergone CGP between June 2019 and December 2021 using data from the nationwide Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database. Two types of CGP assays (tissue and liquid biopsies) were compared and a higher detection rate of genetic abnormalities in tissue specimens was revealed. HRD-related gene alterations were detected in 23% of patients, with BRCA1/2 mutations accounting for 0.9% and 2.9% of patients, respectively. Treatment outcome analysis indicated that patients with BRCA1/2 mutations had a longer time to treatment discontinuation with FOLFIRINOX than gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy (9.3 vs. 5.6 months, p = 0.028). However, no significant differences were observed in the treatment response among the other HRD-related genes. Logistic regression analysis identified younger age and family history of breast, prostate, and ovarian cancers as predictive factors for HRD-related gene alterations. Despite the lack of progression-free survival data and the inability to discriminate between germline and somatic mutations, this study provides valuable insights into the clinical implications of CGP in Japanese patients with PDAC. Further research is warranted to optimize panel selection and elucidate the efficacy of platinum-based therapies depending on the HRD status.

1G6-D7 Inhibits Homologous Recombination Repair by Targeting Extracellular HSP90α to Promote Apoptosis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Despite recent advances in treatment, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to have a high mortality rate. Currently, NSCLC pathogenesis requires further investigation, and therapeutic drugs are still under development. Homologous recombination repair (HRR) repairs severe DNA double-strand breaks. Homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) occurs when HRR is impaired and causes irreparable double-strand DNA damage, leading to genomic instability and increasing the risk of cancer development. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors can effectively treat HRD-positive tumors. Extracellular heat shock protein 90α (eHSP90α) is highly expressed in hypoxic environments and inhibits apoptosis, thereby increasing cellular tolerance. Here, we investigated the relationship between eHSP90α and HRR in NSCLC. DNA damage models were established in NSCLC cell lines (A549 and H1299). The activation of DNA damage and HRR markers, apoptosis, proliferation, and migration were investigated. In vivo tumor models were established using BALB/c nude mice and A549 cells. We found that human recombinant HSP90α stimulation further activated HRR and reduced DNA damage extent; however, eHSP90α monoclonal antibody, 1G6-D7, effectively inhibited HRR. HRR inhibition and increased apoptosis were observed after LRP1 knockdown; this effect could not be reversed with hrHSP90α addition. The combined use of 1G6-D7 and olaparib caused significant apoptosis and HRR inhibition in vitro and demonstrated promising anti-tumor effects in vivo. Extracellular HSP90α may be involved in HRR in NSCLC through LRP1. The combined use of 1G6-D7 and PARP inhibitors may exert anti-tumor effects by inhibiting DNA repair and further inducing apoptosis of NSCLC cells.

Association between homologous recombination deficiency status and carboplatin treatment response in early triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status and its correlation with carboplatin treatment response in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients.

METHODS

Tumor tissues from 225 consecutive TNBC patients were evaluated with an HRD panel and homologous recombination-related (HRR) gene expression data. HRD positivity was defined as a high HRD score and/or BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutation. Clinicopathological factors, neoadjuvant treatment response, and prognosis were analyzed with respect to HRD status in these TNBC patients.

RESULTS

HRD positivity was found in 53.3% of patients and was significantly related to high Ki67 levels (P = 0.001). In patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HRD positivity (P = 0.005) or a high HRD score (P = 0.003) was significantly associated with a greater pathological complete response (pCR) rate, especially in those treated with carboplatin-containing neoadjuvant regimens (HRD positivity vs. negativity: 50.00% vs. 17.65%, P = 0.040). HRD positivity was associated with favorable distant metastasis-free survival (hazard ratio HR 0.49, 95% confidence interval CI 0.26-0.90, P = 0.022) and overall survival (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-0.99, P = 0.049), irrespective of carboplatin treatment.

CONCLUSION

TNBC patients with high HRDs had high Ki67 levels and BRCA mutations. HRD-positive TNBC patients treated with carboplatin had a higher pCR rate. Patients with HRD positivity had a better prognosis, irrespective of carboplatin treatment, warranting further evaluation.

Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence Predicts Homologous Recombination Deficiency and Platinum Response From Histologic Slides

PURPOSE

Cancers with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) can benefit from platinum salts and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Standard diagnostic tests for detecting HRD require molecular profiling, which is not universally available.

METHODS

We trained DeepHRD, a deep learning platform for predicting HRD from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histopathological slides, using primary breast (n = 1,008) and ovarian (n = 459) cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). DeepHRD was compared with four standard HRD molecular tests using breast (n = 349) and ovarian (n = 141) cancers from multiple independent data sets, including platinum-treated clinical cohorts with RECIST progression-free survival (PFS), complete response (CR), and overall survival (OS) endpoints.

RESULTS

DeepHRD predicted HRD from held-out H&E-stained breast cancer slides in TCGA with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.85). This performance was confirmed in two independent primary breast cancer cohorts (AUC, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.71 to 0.82]). In an external platinum-treated metastatic breast cancer cohort, samples predicted as HRD had higher complete CR (AUC, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.93]) with 3.7-fold increase in median PFS (14.4 v 3.9 months; P = .0019) and hazard ratio (HR) of 0.45 (P = .0047). There were no significant differences in nonplatinum treatment outcome by predicted HRD status in three breast cancer cohorts, including CR (AUC, 0.39) and PFS (HR, 0.98, P = .95) in taxane-treated metastatic breast cancer. Through transfer learning to high-grade serous ovarian cancer, DeepHRD-predicted HRD samples had better OS after first-line (HR, 0.46; P = .030) and neoadjuvant (HR, 0.49; P = .015) platinum therapy in two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

DeepHRD can predict HRD in breast and ovarian cancers directly from routine H&E slides across multiple external cohorts, slide scanners, and tissue fixation variables. When compared with molecular testing, DeepHRD classified 1.8- to 3.1-fold more patients with HRD, which exhibited better OS in high-grade serous ovarian cancer and platinum-specific PFS in metastatic breast cancer.

PARP Inhibitors in Pancreatic Cancer with Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations: A Single-Institution Experience

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available regarding the anticancer activity of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) in pancreatic cancer with mutations in HRR genes other than BRCA and PALB2.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 48 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer harboring pathogenic germline and/or somatic HRR mutations who were treated with PARPis.

RESULTS

Thirty patients had germline (g)HRR mutations only, twelve had somatic (s)HRR mutations only, and six had concomitant gHRR and sHRR mutations. The objective response rate (ORR) was 22%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) were 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively. Five patients received olaparib in the front-line setting due to borderline performance status. Their ORR was 20%, and their mPFS and mOS were both 11.3 months. The ORR was higher in patients with BRCA or PALB2 mutations (germline or somatic) than in those with non-BRCA/PALB2 mutations. Patients with somatic non-BRCA/PALB2 variants had a shorter mPFS. Patients with concomitant gHRR/sHRR mutations or gHRR mutations alone had a significantly longer mPFS than those with sHRR mutations only.

CONCLUSIONS

PARP inhibitors may be considered for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer harboring pathogenic alterations of BRCA who cannot tolerate standard chemotherapy. Maintenance PARPis can be considered in selected patients with non-BRCA/non-PALB2 HRR mutations.

Consensus, debate, and prospective on pancreatic cancer treatments

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most aggressive solid tumors. As a systemic disease, despite the improvement of multi-modality treatment strategies, the prognosis of pancreatic cancer was not improved dramatically. For resectable or borderline resectable patients, the surgical strategy centered on improving R0 resection rate is consensus; however, the role of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable patients and the optimal neoadjuvant therapy of chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in borderline resectable patients were debated. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of gemcitabine/capecitabine or mFOLFIRINOX is recommended regardless of the margin status. Chemotherapy as the first-line treatment strategy for advanced or metastatic patients included FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, or NALIRIFOX regimens whereas 5-FU plus liposomal irinotecan was the only standard of care second-line therapy. Immunotherapy is an innovative therapy although anti-PD-1 antibody is currently the only agent approved by for MSI-H, dMMR, or TMB-high solid tumors, which represent a very small subset of pancreatic cancers. Combination strategies to increase the immunogenicity and to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment may sensitize pancreatic cancer to immunotherapy. Targeted therapies represented by PARP and KRAS inhibitors are also under investigation, showing benefits in improving progression-free survival and objective response rate. This review discusses the current treatment modalities and highlights innovative therapies for pancreatic cancer.

Prediction of homologous recombination deficiency from routine histology with attention-based multiple instance learning in nine different tumor types

BACKGROUND

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is recognized as a pan-cancer predictive biomarker that potentially indicates who could benefit from treatment with PARP inhibitors (PARPi). Despite its clinical significance, HRD testing is highly complex. Here, we investigated in a proof-of-concept study whether Deep Learning (DL) can predict HRD status solely based on routine hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) histology images across nine different cancer types.

METHODS

We developed a deep learning pipeline with attention-weighted multiple instance learning (attMIL) to predict HRD status from histology images. As part of our approach, we calculated a genomic scar HRD score by combining loss of heterozygosity (LOH), telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI), and large-scale state transitions (LST) from whole genome sequencing (WGS) data of n = 5209 patients across two independent cohorts. The model's effectiveness was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), focusing on its accuracy in predicting genomic HRD against a clinically recognized cutoff value.

RESULTS

Our study demonstrated the predictability of genomic HRD status in endometrial, pancreatic, and lung cancers reaching cross-validated AUROCs of 0.79, 0.58, and 0.66, respectively. These predictions generalized well to an external cohort, with AUROCs of 0.93, 0.81, and 0.73. Moreover, a breast cancer-trained image-based HRD classifier yielded an AUROC of 0.78 in the internal validation cohort and was able to predict HRD in endometrial, prostate, and pancreatic cancer with AUROCs of 0.87, 0.84, and 0.67, indicating that a shared HRD-like phenotype occurs across these tumor entities.

CONCLUSIONS

This study establishes that HRD can be directly predicted from H&E slides using attMIL, demonstrating its applicability across nine different tumor types.

Pancreatic cancer: new approaches to drug therapy

Outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain poor due to a variety of biological, clinical, and societal factors. However, in recent years, PDAC has seen 1) increased precision of initial evaluation, 2) increased emphasis on supportive care, 3) deeper understanding of the translation biology of PDAC, especially as pertains to genomic alterations, and 4) foundational combination chemotherapy clinical trials across all disease stages. These advances have led to a wide range of new approaches to drug therapy for PDAC. Currently available drugs are showing added benefit, both by resequencing them with each other and also with respect to other therapeutic modalities. Molecular strategies are being developed to predict response to known therapeutic agents and to identify others. Additionally, a wide range of new drugs for PDAC are under development, including drugs which inhibit critical molecular pathways, drugs which attempt to capitalize on homologous repair deficiencies, immunotherapeutic approaches, antimetabolic agents, and drugs which attack the extracellular matrix which supports PDAC growth. These new approaches offer the promise of improved survival for future PDAC patients.

A case of BRCA1-mutated giant pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma successfully treated with modified FOLFIRINOX therapy and radical resection

Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) is a rare type of pancreatic cancer; further, its pathogenesis and treatment strategies remain unclear. We report the case of a 70-year-old man who presented with a chief complaint of abdominal distention. Computed tomography scans revealed a large lobulated mass (tumor diameter: 150 mm) in the pancreatic body tail, which was diagnosed as a PACC through endoscopic ultrasonography fine needle aspiration. The other imaging modalities did not reveal distant metastases, and the tumor was classified as resectable. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was planned after staging laparoscopy ruled out microscopic distant metastasis. First-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel failed due to tumor growth and worsening abdominal distention. Evaluation using the BRACAnalysis® device indicated that the patient was positive for BRCA1 mutation. Second-line modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) resulted in a marked decrease in elastase 1 levels; moreover, a partial antitumor response was observed, which prompted radical resection. After distal pancreatectomy, the patient has survived for 3.5 years without recurrence. BRCA-mutated pancreatic cancer is more likely to respond to mFFX, including platinum, and BRCA mutations have been reported to be highly prevalent in PACC. It is important to evaluate the presence of BRCA mutations in patients with PACC prior to treatment.

Clinical utility of BRCA and ATM mutation status in circulating tumour DNA for treatment selection in advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Identification of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) remains a challenge in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). We investigated the utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) profiling in the assessment of BRCA1/2 and ATM mutation status and treatment selection in APC.

METHODS

We analysed clinical and ctDNA data of 702 patients with APC enroled in GOZILA, a ctDNA profiling study using Guardant360.

RESULTS

Inactivating BRCA1/2 and ATM mutations were detected in 4.8% (putative germline, 3.7%) and 4.4% (putative germline, 0.9%) of patients, respectively. Objective response (63.2% vs. 16.2%) and PFS (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.93) on platinum-containing chemotherapy were significantly better in patients with putative germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA) mutation than those without. In contrast, putative gBRCA mutation had no impact on the efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. In 2 patients treated with platinum-containing therapy, putative BRCA2 reversion mutations were detected. Three of seven patients with somatic BRCA mutations responded to platinum-containing therapy, while only one of four with putative germline ATM mutations did. One-third of somatic ATM mutations were in genomic loci associated with clonal haematopoiesis.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive ctDNA profiling provides clinically relevant information regarding HRD status. It can be a practical, convenient option for HRD screening in APC.

Mcl-1 expression is a predictive marker of response to gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer

Antiapoptotic protein, including Mcl-1, expression is frequently observed in pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine plus nabpaclitaxel (GnP) is the standard chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC); however, predictive markers for its efficacy remain unestablished. This study evaluated the association between GnP's therapeutic effects and Mcl-1 expression in tissue samples obtained using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic tumor or percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy for metastatic liver tumor. We retrospectively reviewed 38 patients with histologically diagnosed MPC who received GnP as the first-line chemotherapy at our institute between December 2014 and July 2018. Post-immunohistochemistry analysis for Mcl-1 expression detection, patients were divided to into two groups based on the cell proportion showing Mcl-1 immunoreactivity: positive (> 20%; 23 [60.5%] patients) and negative (≤ 20%; 15 [39.5%] patients) groups. Clinical characteristics did not differ between the two groups. The Mcl-1 positive group showed a significantly higher disease control rate (95.7% vs. 73.3%; P = 0.046), longer progressionfree survival (PFS) (7.2 months vs. 4.9 months; P = 0.018) and longer overall survival (OS) (14.9 months vs. 9.2 months; P = 0.008) than the Mcl-1 negative group. Multivariate analysis showed that Mcl-1 expression was an independent predictive marker for PFS and OS. Mcl-1 expression could be a predictive marker for favorable response to GnP.

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is associated with better prognosis and possibly causes a non-inflamed tumour microenvironment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score is a reliable indicator of genomic instability. The significance of HRD in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), particularly its influence on prognosis and the immune microenvironment, has yet to be adequately explored. Understanding HRD status comprehensively can offer valuable insights for guiding precision treatment. We utilised three cohorts to investigate HRD status in NPC: the Zhujiang cohort from local collection and the Hong Kong (SRA288429) and Singapore (SRP035573) cohorts from public datasets. The GATK (genome analysis toolkit) best practice process was employed to investigate germline and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations and various bioinformatics tools and algorithms to examine the association between HRD status and clinical molecular characteristics. We found that individuals with a negative HRD status (no-HRD) exhibited a higher risk of recurrence [hazard ratio (HR), 1.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.03-333.76; p = 0.012] in the Zhujiang cohort, whereas, in the Singapore cohort, they experienced a higher risk of mortality (HR, 26.04; 95% CI, 1.43-34.21; p = 0.016) compared with those in the HRD group. In vitro experiments demonstrated that NPC cells with BRCA1 knockdown exhibit heightened sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, the HRD group showed significantly higher tumour mutational burden and tumour neoantigen burden levels than the no-HRD group. Immune infiltration analysis indicated that HRD tissues tend to have a non-inflamed tumour microenvironment. In conclusion, patients with HRD exhibit a comparatively favourable prognosis in NPC, possibly associated with a non-inflammatory immune microenvironment. These findings have positive implications for treatment stratification, enabling the selection of more precise and effective therapeutic approaches and aiding in the prediction of treatment response and prognosis to a certain extent.

Clinical significance of germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (gBRCA) testing and olaparib as maintenance therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (gBRCA) mutation in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) is not common in clinical practice. Therefore, factors that efficiently show gBRCA mutations and the real-world outcomes of olaparib maintenance therapy have not been fully established. In the present study, we clarified the indicators for the effective detection of gBRCA mutation and the efficacy and safety of olaparib as maintenance therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 84 patients with PC who underwent gBRCA testing (BRACAnalysis, Myriad Genetics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) at our institute between January 2021 and March 2022. For each patient, clinical data were extracted from medical records.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 64 y (29-85 y), and 41 patients (48.8%) were male. The gBRCA mutations were identified in 10 (11.9%) patients; two patients had BRCA1 mutation and eight had BRCA2 mutation. All patients with gBRCA mutation had a family history of any cancer, and eight of them had a family history of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC)-related cancer. The gBRCA mutation rate was higher for patients with PC with a family history of HBOC-related cancer compared to that in patients with PC having a family history of other cancers and no family history of cancer (22.9% vs. 4.1%; P = 0.014). In our study, eight out of 10 patients with gBRCA-positive PC received olaparib after platinum-based chemotherapy. The best responses to platinum-based chemotherapy included a complete response in one patient (12.5%) and a partial response in seven patients (87.5%). The median duration of treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy plus olaparib was 17.5 months (8-87 months), and the duration of treatment with olaparib maintenance therapy was 11 months (1-30 months). During olaparib maintenance therapy, three patients showed no disease progression. One of these three patients underwent conversion surgery after receiving olaparib for 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The gBRCA testing should be considered proactively, especially in patients with PC with a family history of HBOC-related cancer.

The mutagenic consequences of defective DNA repair

Multiple separate repair mechanisms safeguard the genome against various types of DNA damage, and their failure can increase the rate of spontaneous mutagenesis. The malfunction of distinct repair mechanisms leads to genomic instability through different mutagenic processes. For example, defective mismatch repair causes high base substitution rates and microsatellite instability, whereas homologous recombination deficiency is characteristically associated with deletions and chromosome instability. This review presents a comprehensive collection of all mutagenic phenotypes associated with the loss of each DNA repair mechanism, drawing on data from a variety of model organisms and mutagenesis assays, and placing greatest emphasis on systematic analyses of human cancer datasets. We describe the latest theories on the mechanism of each mutagenic process, often explained by reliance on an alternative repair pathway or the error-prone replication of unrepaired, damaged DNA. Aided by the concept of mutational signatures, the genomic phenotypes can be used in cancer diagnosis to identify defective DNA repair pathways.

Hereditary Cancer Clinics Improve Adherence to NCCN Germline Testing Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 10%. In November 2018, NCCN recommended that all patients with PDAC receive genetic counseling (GC) and germline testing regardless of family history. We hypothesized that patients with PDAC were more likely to be referred for testing after this change to the guidelines, regardless of presumed predictive factors, and that compliance would be further improved following the implementation of a hereditary cancer clinic (HCC).

METHODS

We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with PDAC from June 2017 through December 2021 at University of California, Irvine. We compared rates of genetics referral among patients in different diagnostic eras: the 18-month period before the NCCN Guideline change (pre-NCCN era: June 2017 through November 2018), 14 months following the change (post-NCCN era: December 2018 through January 2020), and 18 months after the creation of an HCC (HCC era: June 2020 through December 2021). Family and personal cancer history, genetics referral patterns, and results of GC were recorded. Data were compared using chi-square, Fisher exact, and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 335 patients were treated for PDAC (123 pre-NCCN, 109 post-NCCN, and 103 HCC) at University of California, Irvine. Demographics across groups were comparable. Prior to the guideline changes, 30% were referred to GC compared with 54.7% in the post-NCCN era. After the implementation of the HCC, 77.4% were referred to GC (P<.0001). The odds ratio (OR) for referral to GC among patients with a positive family history of cancer progressively decreased following the change (pre-NCCN era: OR, 11.90 [95% CI, 3.00-80.14]; post-NCCN era: OR, 3.39 [95% CI, 1.13-10.76]; HCC era: OR, 3.11 [95% CI, 0.95-10.16]).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2018 updates to the NCCN Guidelines for PDAC recommending germline testing for all patients with PDAC significantly increased GC referral rates at our academic medical center. Implementation of an HCC further boosted compliance with guidelines.

Multidisciplinary Standards and Evolving Therapies for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is a challenging disease that presents at an advanced stage and results in many symptoms that negatively influence patients' quality of life and reduce their ability to receive effective treatment. Early implementation of expert multidisciplinary care with nutritional support, exercise, and palliative care for both early-stage and advanced disease promises to maintain or improve the patients' physical, social, and psychological well-being, decrease aggressive interventions at the end of life, and ultimately improve survival. Moreover, advances in treatment strategies in the neoadjuvant and metastatic setting combined with novel therapeutic agents targeting the key drivers of the disease are leading to improvements in the care of patients with pancreatic cancer. Here, we emphasize the multidisciplinary supportive and therapeutic care of patients with PDA, review current guidelines and new developments of neoadjuvant and perioperative treatments for localized disease, as well as the treatment standards and the evolving field of precision oncology and immunotherapies for advanced PDA.

Advances in Surgery and (Neo) Adjuvant Therapy in the Management of Pancreatic Cancer

A multimodality approach, which usually includes chemotherapy, surgery, and/or radiotherapy, is optimal for patients with localized pancreatic cancer. The timing and sequence of these interventions depend on anatomic resectability and the biological suitability of the tumor and the patient. Tumors with vascular involvement (ie, borderline resectable/locally advanced) require surgical reassessments after therapy and participation of surgeons familiar with advanced techniques. When indicated, venous reconstruction should be offered as standard of care because it has acceptable morbidity. Morbidity and mortality of pancreas surgery may be mitigated when surgery is performed at high-volume centers.

The role of germline BRCA1 & BRCA2 mutations in familial pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FPC) presents a notable risk, with 3-10% of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases having a family history. Studies link FPC to syndromes like HBOC, suggesting BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations play a role. BRCA gene functions in DNA repair impact FPC management, influencing sensitivity to therapies like PARP inhibitors. Identifying mutations not only aids FPC treatment but also reveals broader cancer risks. However, challenges persist in selectively applying genetic testing due to cost constraints. This Systematic Review focuses on BRCA1/BRCA2 significance in FPC, diagnostic criteria, prognostic value, and limitations.

METHOD

Original articles published from 2013 to January 2023 were sourced from databases such as Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect. Inclusion criteria comprised observational cohort or diagnostic studies related to the role of BRCA1/2 mutation in correlation to familial pancreatic cancer (FPC), while article reviews, narrative reviews, and non-relevant content were excluded. The assessment of bias used ROBINS-I, and the results were organized using PICOS criteria in a Google spreadsheet table. The systematic review adhered to the PRISMA 2020 checklist.

RESULT

We analyzed 9 diagnostic studies encompassing 1325 families and 4267 patients from Italy, USA, and Poland. Despite the limitation of limited homogenous PICO studies, our findings effectively present evidence. BRCA1/2 demonstrates benefits in detecting first-degree relatives FPC involvement with 2.26-10 times higher risk. These mutation findings also play an important role since with the BRCA1/2 targeted therapy, Poly-ADP Ribose Polymerase inhibitors (PARP) may give better outcomes of FPC treatment. Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 administration's impact on odds ratio (OR) based on six and five studies respectively. BRCA1 exhibited non-significant effects (OR = 1.26, P = 0.51), while BRCA2 showed significance (OR = 1.68, P = 0.04). No heterogeneity observed, indicating consistent results. Further research on BRCA1 is warranted.

CONCLUSION

Detecting the BRCA1/2 mutation gene offers numerous advantages, particularly in its correlation with FPC. For diagnostic and prognostic purposes, testing is strongly recommended for first-degree relatives, who face a significantly higher risk (2.26-10 times) of being affected. Additionally, FPC patients with identified BRCA1/2 mutations exhibit a more favorable prognosis compared to the non-mutated population. This is attributed to the availability of targeted BRCA1/2 therapy, which maximizes treatment outcomes.

Mutational profiling of 103 unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas using EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy

Background and Objective

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most lethal cancers, with a 5-year survival rate of around 9%. Only 20% are candidates for surgery. Most unresectable patients undergo EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosis. Identification of targetable mutations using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly requested. Data on feasibility of EUS-FNB for NGS and knowledge regarding mutational profile of unresectable PDAC are scarce. We evaluated the "technical yield" of EUS-FNB for NGS in unresectable PDAC: relative fraction of diagnostic EUS-FNBs meeting technical criteria. We also investigated the "molecular yield": relative fraction of EUS-FNBs included in NGS containing sufficient DNA for detection of at least one mutation. Furthermore, we determined the relative frequency of cancer-associated mutations in unresectable PDAC.

Patients and Methods

Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded EUS-FNBs diagnostic of unresectable PDAC and fulfilling these criteria were included (n = 105): minimum 3-mm2 tissue, minimum of 2-mm2 tumor area, and minimum 20% relative tumor area. NGS was performed using Ion GeneStudio S5 Prime System and Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay v.3 including 161 cancer-related genes.

Results

Technical yield was 48% (105/219) and molecular yield was 98% (103/105). Most frequently mutated genes were KRAS (89.3%) and TP53 (69.9%), followed by CDKN2A (24.3%), ARID1A (9.7%), SMAD4 (7.8%), TSC2 (7.8%), and CCND3 (6.8%).

Conclusion

EUS-FNB for NGS of unresectable PDAC is feasible. Our technical criteria for NGS, using leftovers in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded blocks after routine pathology diagnosis, were met by around half of EUS-FNBs. Almost all EUS-FNBs fulfilling the technical criteria yielded a successful NGS analysis.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for comprehensive genomic profiling

Advances in next-generation sequencing have made comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) using tumor tissue specimens and liquid biopsy using blood samples feasible in routine clinical practice. In the context of pancreaticobiliary cancer, it is necessary to consider CGP in formulating individualized treatment strategies. Performing CGP with tumor tissue specimens requires a sufficient number of high-quality samples. EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is expected to play a significant role in this regard, and endosonographers need to address this role. Here, we review the current status of EUS-TA for CGP focusing on pancreatic cancer and biliary tract cancer.

Treatment resistance in pancreatic and biliary tract cancer: molecular and clinical pharmacology perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Treatment resistance poses a significant obstacle in oncology, especially in biliary tract cancer (BTC) and pancreatic cancer (PC). Current therapeutic options include chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Resistance to these treatments may arise due to diverse molecular mechanisms, such as genetic and epigenetic modifications, altered drug metabolism and efflux, and changes in the tumor microenvironment. Identifying and overcoming these mechanisms is a major focus of research: strategies being explored include combination therapies, modulation of the tumor microenvironment, and personalized approaches.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a current overview and discussion of the most relevant mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy, target therapy, and immunotherapy in both BTC and PC. Furthermore, we compare the different strategies that are being implemented to overcome these obstacles.

EXPERT OPINION

So far there is no unified theory on drug resistance and progress is limited. To overcome this issue, individualized patient approaches, possibly through liquid biopsies or single-cell transcriptome studies, are suggested, along with the potential use of artificial intelligence, to guide effective treatment strategies. Furthermore, we provide insights into what we consider the most promising areas of research, and we speculate on the future of managing treatment resistance to improve patient outcomes.

Pancreatic cancer biomarkers: A pathway to advance in personalized treatment selection

Pancreatic cancer is one of the tumors with the worst prognosis, and unlike other cancers, few advances have been made in recent years. The only curative option is surgery, but only 15-20% of patients are candidates, with a high risk of relapse. In advanced pancreatic cancer there are few first-line treatment options and no validated biomarkers for better treatment selection. The development of targeted therapies in pancreatic cancer is increasingly feasible due to tumor-agnostic treatments, such as PARP inhibitors in patients with BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 alterations or immunotherapies in patients with high microsatellite instability/tumor mutational burden. In addition, other therapeutic molecules have been developed for patients with KRAS G12C mutation or fusions in NTRK or NRG1. Consequently, there has been a growing interest in biomarkers that may help guide targeted therapy in pancreatic cancer. Therefore, this review aims to offer an updated perspective on biomarkers with therapeutic potential in pancreatic cancer.

Prediction of Adjuvant Gemcitabine Sensitivity in Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Using the GemPred RNA Signature: An Ancillary Study of the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

GemPred, a transcriptomic signature predictive of the efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM), was developed from cell lines and organoids and validated retrospectively. The phase III PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 trial has demonstrated the superiority of modified folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) over GEM as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at the expense of higher toxicity. We evaluated the potential predictive value of GemPred in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Routine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded surgical specimens of 350 patients were retrieved for RNA sequencing and GemPred prediction (167 in the GEM arm and 183 in the mFOLFIRINOX [mFFX] arm). Survival analyses were stratified by resection margins, lymph node status, and cancer antigen 19-9 level.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients' tumors (25.5%) were GemPred+ and were thus predicted to be gemcitabine-sensitive. In the GEM arm, GemPred+ patients (n = 50, 30%) had a significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) than GemPred- patients (n = 117, 70%; median 27.3 v 10.2 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.43 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.65]; P < .001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; median 68.4 v 28.6 months, HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66]; P < .001). GemPred had no prognostic value in the mFFX arm. DFS and CSS were similar in GemPred+ patients who received adjuvant GEM and mFFX (median 27.3 v 24.0 months, and 68.4 v 51.4 months, respectively). The statistical interaction between GEM and GemPred+ status was significant for DFS (P = .008) and CSS (P = .004). GemPred+ patients had significantly more adverse events of grade ≥3 in the mFFX arm (76%) compared with those in the GEM arm (40%; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

This ancillary study of a phase III randomized trial demonstrates that among the quarter of patients with a GemPred-positive transcriptomic signature, survival was comparable with that of mFOLFIRINOX, whereas those receiving adjuvant gemcitabine had fewer adverse events.

Comprehensive review of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma: epidemiology, diagnosis, molecular features and treatment

Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma is a rare form (0.2-4.3%) of pancreatic neoplasm with unique clinical and molecular characteristics, which largely differ from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma occurs more frequently in males and can occur in children. Serum lipase is elevated in 24-58% of patients with pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma. Pancreatic acinar cell carcinomas tend to be large at diagnosis (median tumour size: ~5 cm) and are frequently located in the pancreas head. Radiologically, pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma generally exhibits a solid appearance; however, necrosis, cystic changes and intratumoral haemorrhage can occur in larger lesions. Immunostaining is essential for the definitive diagnosis of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma. Compared with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma has a more favourable prognosis. Although radical surgery is recommended for patients with pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma who do not have distant metastases, the recurrence rate is high. The effectiveness of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma is unclear. The response to FOLFIRINOX is generally favourable, and some patients achieve a complete response. Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma has a different genomic profile compared with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Although genomic analyses have shown that pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma rarely has KRAS, TP53 and CDKN2A mutations, it has a higher prevalence of homologous recombination-related genes, including BRCA1/2 and ATM, than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, suggesting high sensitivity to platinum-containing regimens and PARP inhibitors. Targeted therapies for genomic alternations are beneficial. Therefore, genetic testing is important for patients with pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma to choose the optimal therapeutic strategy.

A deep-learning-based genomic status estimating framework for homologous recombination deficiency detection from low-pass whole genome sequencing

Genome-wide sequencing allows for prediction of clinical treatment responses and outcomes by estimating genomic status. Here, we developed Genomic Status scan (GSscan), a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based deep-learning framework, which utilizes low-pass whole genome sequencing (WGS) data to capture genomic instability-related features. In this study, GSscan directly surveys homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status independent of other existing biomarkers. In breast cancer, GSscan achieved an AUC of 0.980 in simulated low-pass WGS data, and obtained a higher HRD risk score in clinical BRCA-deficient breast cancer samples (p = 1.3 × 10-4, compared with BRCA-intact samples). In ovarian cancer, GSscan obtained higher HRD risk scores in BRCA-deficient samples in both simulated data and clinical samples (p = 2.3 × 10-5 and p = 0.039, respectively, compared with BRCA-intact samples). Moreover, HRD-positive patients predicted by GSscan showed longer progression-free intervals in TCGA datasets (p = 0.0011) treated with platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy, outperforming existing low-pass WGS-based methods. Furthermore, GSscan can accurately predict HRD status using only 1 ng of input DNA and a minimum sequencing coverage of 0.02 × , providing a reliable, accessible, and cost-effective approach. In summary, GSscan effectively and accurately detected HRD status, and provide a broadly applicable framework for disease diagnosis and selecting appropriate disease treatment.

Germline mutations of homologous recombination genes and clinical outcomes in pancreatic cancer: a multicenter study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Cancer susceptibility germline mutations are associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the hereditary status of PDAC and its impact on survival is largely unknown in the Asian population.

METHODS

Exome sequencing was performed on 527 blood samples from PDAC individuals and analyzed for mutations in 80 oncogenic genes. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variants were diagnosed according to the ACMG variant classification categories. The association between germline homologous recombination gene mutations (gHRmut, including BAP1, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, BLM, BRIP1, CHEK2, NBN, MUTYH, FANCA and FANCC) and the treatment outcomes was explored in patients with stage III/IV diseases treated with first-line (1L) platinum-based versus platinum-free chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 104 of 527 (19.7%) patients carried germline P/LP variants. The most common mutated genes were BRCA2 (3.60%), followed by ATR (2.66%) and ATM (1.9%). After a median follow-up duration of 38.3-months (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 35.0-43.7), the median overall survival (OS) was not significantly different among patients with gHRmut, non-HR germline mutations, or no mutation (P = 0.43). Among the 320 patients with stage III/IV disease who received 1L combination chemotherapy, 32 (10%) had gHRmut. Of them, patients receiving 1L platinum-based chemotherapy exhibited a significantly longer median OS compared to those with platinum-free chemotherapy, 26.1 months (95% CI 12.7-33.7) versus 9.6 months (95% CI 5.9-17.6), P = 0.001. However, the median OS of patients without gHRmut was 14.5 months (95% CI 13.2-16.9) and 12.6 months (95% CI 10.8-14.7) for patients receiving 1L platinum-based and platinum-free chemotherapy, respectively (P = 0.22). These results were consistent after adjusting for potential confounding factors including age, tumor stage, performance status, and baseline CA 19.9 in the multivariate Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that nearly 20% of Taiwanese PDAC patients carried germline P/LP variants. The longer survival observed in gHRmut patients treated with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy highlights the importance of germline testing for all patients with advanced PDAC at diagnosis.

NALIRIFOX, FOLFIRINOX, and Gemcitabine With Nab-Paclitaxel as First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

The NAPOLI 3 trial showed the superiority of fluorouracil, leucovorin, liposomal irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) over the combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NABP) as first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Analyses comparing NALIRIFOX and GEM-NABP with fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) have not yet been reported.

Objective

To derive survival, response, and toxic effects data from phase 3 clinical trials and compare NALIRIFOX, FOLFIRINOX, and GEM-NABP.

Data Sources

After a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology meetings' libraries, Kaplan-Meier curves were extracted from phase 3 clinical trials conducted from January 1, 2011, until September 12, 2023.

Study Selection

Phase 3 clinical trials that tested NALIRIFOX, FOLFIRINOX, or GEM-NABP as first-line treatment of metastatic PDAC and reported overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were selected. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Individual Participant Data reporting guidelines.

Data Extraction And Synthesis

Individual patient OS and PFS data were extracted from Kaplan-Meier plots of original trials via a graphic reconstructive algorithm. Overall response rates (ORRs) and grade 3 or higher toxic effects rates were also collected. A pooled analysis was conducted, and results were validated via a network meta-analysis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was OS. Secondary outcomes included PFS, ORR, and toxic effects rates.

Results

A total of 7 trials with data on 2581 patients were analyzed, including 383 patients treated with NALIRIFOX, 433 patients treated with FOLFIRINOX, and 1756 patients treated with GEM-NABP. Median PFS was longer in patients treated with NALIRIFOX (7.4 [95% CI, 6.1-7.7] months) or FOLFIRINOX (7.3 [95% CI, 6.5-7.9] months; [HR], 1.21 [95% CI, 0.86-1.70]; P = .28) compared with patients treated with GEM-NABP (5.7 [95% CI, 5.6-6.1] months; HR vs NALIRIFOX, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.22-1.73]; P < .001). Similarly, GEM-NABP was associated with poorer OS (10.4 [95% CI, 9.8-10.8]; months) compared with NALIRIFOX (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.00-1.39]; P = .05], while no difference was observed between FOLFIRINOX (11.7 [95% CI, 10.4-13.0] months) and NALIRIFOX (11.1 [95% CI, 10.1-12.3] months; HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.81-1.39]; P = .65). There were no statistically significant differences in ORR among NALIRIFOX (41.8%), FOLFIRINOX (31.6%), and GEM-NABP (35.0%). NALIRIFOX was associated with lower incidence of grade 3 or higher hematological toxic effects (eg, platelet count decreased 1.6% vs 11.8% with FOLFIRINOX and 10.8% with GEM-NABP), but higher rates of severe diarrhea compared with GEM-NABP (20.3% vs 15.7%).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, NALIRIFOX and FOLFIRINOX were associated with similar PFS and OS as first-line treatment of advanced PDAC, although NALIRIFOX was associated with a different toxicity profile. Careful patient selection, financial toxic effects consideration, and direct comparison between FOLFIRINOX and NALIRIFOX are warranted.

Therapeutic developments in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a rising incidence and is one of the most lethal human malignancies. Much is known regarding the biology and pathophysiology of PDAC, but translating this knowledge to the clinic to improve patient outcomes has been challenging. In this Review, we discuss advances and practice-changing trials for PDAC. We briefly review therapeutic failures as well as ongoing research to refine the standard of care, including novel biomarkers and clinical trial designs. In addition, we highlight contemporary areas of research, including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, KRAS-targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Finally, we discuss the future of pancreatic cancer research and areas for improvement in the next decade.

Current status and perspectives of genetic testing in gastrointestinal cancer (Review)

Genetic testing has become widespread in daily medical care for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, unlike breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer, in which personalized medicine targeting various driver genes is standardized, the incidence of targeted gene abnormalities in GI cancers is low. Nevertheless, such abnormalities may be linked to therapeutic agents and the further development of therapeutic agents for personalized medicine for GI cancers is desired. A liquid biopsy is of great benefit in offering clinical decision support, in applications such as GI cancer screening, surgical interventions, monitoring disease status and enhancing patient survival outcomes, all of which would contribute to personalized medicine. Germline genetic testing is required for several types of GI cancer, which shows clinical indications of hereditary predisposition. The increasing use of multigene panel testing has redefined gene-cancer associations, and consequently the estimate of cancer risk that vary from low to high penetrance. Comprehensive genetic testing can enable the detection of novel treatment targets and the discovery of undefined multiple diagnostic/predictive markers, which may enhance the molecular-level understanding of GI cancers. Genetic testing can also aid the design of more appropriate and adequate genomic-driven therapies for patients who may benefit from other standardized therapeutic methods.

Deciphering the Pathways to PARP Sensitivity in Pancreatic Cancer

A recent article analyzed paired cell-free DNA among patients with platinum-sensitive BRCA- or PALB2-mutated pancreatic cancer who received maintenance olaparib. Reversion mutations were linked with worse outcomes. These types of paired correlative studies are needed to improve our understanding of drug resistance and guide future clinical trials. See related article by Brown et al., p. 5207.

Clinical features of germline BRCA1/2 or ATM pathogenic variant positive pancreatic cancer in Japan

BACKGROUND

There has been increasing interest into the role of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA PV) and gATM PV and likely PV (PV and LPV; PV + LPV) in the carcinogenesis and treatment of pancreatic cancer (PC), but the clinical features have not been well described.

METHODS

Patients with confirmed gBRCA PV and gATM PV + LPV PC treated at our hospital between April 2016 and December 2021, were retrospectively evaluated for clinical characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients harbored gBRCA PV and three patients harbored gATM PV + LPV. Of the gBRCA PV patients, 81.8 % received platinum-based chemotherapy with favorable treatment outcomes with an objective response rate of 50.0 % (95 % CI: 23.0-77.0), median progression free survival (PFS) of 334 days, and median overall survival (OS) of 926 days from the initiation of first-line chemotherapy. The annual number of patients with gBRCA PV was two patients per year before January 2021 (when BRACAnalysis became available in Japan), and ten patients during the 10 months thereafter. Four patients (20 %) with gBRCA PV developed soft-tissue metastasis with progression. Two patients with gATM PV + LPV received platinum-based chemotherapy and the best response of those patients was partial response and stable disease and their OS from the initiation of first-line chemotherapy was 1192 and 989 days, and PFS was 579 and 140 days, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of gBRCA PV-positive PC has increased revealed in recent years. These tumors appear to be sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy, with long term survival observed in gATM PV + LPV-positive patients.

Initial chemotherapy option for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in patients with adequate performance status

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly progressive lethal malignancy, with chemotherapy being the primary treatment modality. This article provides a review of the initial chemotherapy options for PDAC patients with adequate performance status, comparing FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) or modified FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NabP) regimens. The availability of limited evidence from randomized trials restricts a direct comparison between the 2 regimens. Based on our review, (m)FOLFIRINOX yields superior survival outcomes compared to GEM-NabP in metastatic PDAC. For locally advanced PDAC, either (m)FOLFIRINOX or GEM-NabP can be considered initial chemotherapy. In the neoadjuvant setting for borderline resectable PDAC, both regimens have demonstrated promising results in achieving feasible resection rates. However, mFOLFIRINOX remains the preferred choice for adjuvant chemotherapy. The selection of initial chemotherapy for PDAC depends on the disease stage, patients’ performance status, and tumor molecular alterations. Further research and clinical trials are necessary to optimize treatment approaches for PDAC patients.