1
|
Hoshino H, Akama TO, Inoue D, Moritani S, Shigeto S, Matsuda K, Yoshida H, Yonemoto N, Fukushima M, Yoshida Y, Kobayashi M. Establishment of a human ovarian endometrioid carcinoma cell line by constitutive expression of cyclin-dependent kinase 4, cyclin D1 and telomerase reverse transcriptase. Hum Cell 2025; 38:47. [PMID: 39878900 PMCID: PMC11779770 DOI: 10.1007/s13577-025-01176-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/20/2025] [Indexed: 01/31/2025]
Abstract
Only a few human ovarian endometrioid carcinoma cell lines are currently available, partly due to the difficulty of establishing cell lines from low-grade cancers. Here, using a cell immortalization strategy consisting of i) inactivation of the p16INK4a-pRb pathway by constitutive expression of mutant cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (R24C) (CDK4R24C) and cyclin D1, and ii) acquisition of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) activity, we established a human ovarian endometrioid carcinoma cell line from a 46-year-old Japanese woman. That line, designated JFE-21, has proliferated continuously for over 6 months with a doubling time of ~ 55 h. JFE-21 cells exhibit polygonal shapes and proliferate without contact inhibition to form a monolayer in a jigsaw puzzle-like arrangement. Ultrastructurally, JFE-21 cells exhibit well-developed rough endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria and lysosomes in the cytoplasm, with cells contacting each other via desmosomes. G-band karyotype analysis indicated that cells had a near-tetraploid karyotype. Immunofluorescence staining revealed that the expression profile of a series of ovarian carcinoma markers in JFE-21 cells was consistent with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma. Moreover, Sanger sequencing of DNA polymerase ε (POLE) gene and immunohistochemical analysis of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins revealed that JFE-21 cells were classified as the no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subtype. In addition, JFE-21 cells were sensitive to paclitaxel and carboplatin administered to the donor as therapy. These findings indicate that constitutive expression of CDK4R24C, cyclin D1 and TERT genes may be an option to establish cell lines from low-grade cancers, including ovarian endometrioid carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hitomi Hoshino
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka-Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji, Fukui, 910-1193, Japan
| | - Tomoya O Akama
- Department of Pharmacology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Daisuke Inoue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Eiheiji, Japan
| | - Suzuko Moritani
- Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital, Otsu, Japan
| | - Shohei Shigeto
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Matsuda
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Hisato Yoshida
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka-Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji, Fukui, 910-1193, Japan
| | - Natsumi Yonemoto
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka-Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji, Fukui, 910-1193, Japan
- Division of Surgical Pathology, University of Fukui Hospital, Eiheiji, Japan
| | - Mana Fukushima
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka-Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji, Fukui, 910-1193, Japan
| | - Yoshio Yoshida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Eiheiji, Japan
| | - Motohiro Kobayashi
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka-Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji, Fukui, 910-1193, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen W, Yan L, Li Q, Zhou S, Hou T, Yang H, Ye S. Molecular subtype of ovarian clear cell carcinoma: an analysis of 80 Chinese patients using the TCGA molecular classification of endometrial cancer. BMC Cancer 2025; 25:90. [PMID: 39815187 PMCID: PMC11737267 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-13389-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2024] [Accepted: 12/23/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the utility of the TCGA molecular classification of endometrial cancer in a well-annotated, moderately sized, consecutive cohort of Chinese patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC). METHODS We performed DNA sequencing on 80 OCCC patients via a panel that contains 520 cancer-related genes. The TCGA molecular subtyping method was utilized for classification. The clinicopathological features were analysed, and the survival correlation was assessed for each subtype. RESULTS The most common mutated genes were ARID1A (49%) and PIK3CA (48%). No pathogenic POLE mutations were detected. MSI-high (MSI-H) tumours were observed in 5 (6.3%) patients. A total of 16.3% (13/80) of the patients were classified as the p53 abnormal (p53abn) subtype, and 77.5% (62/80) were classified as the nonspecific molecular profile (NSMP) subtype. All the MSI-H patients had ARID1A mutations, whereas patients with the p53abn subtype had the lowest percentage of ARID1A mutations (27.3%). No significant differences were observed between the molecular subtypes and clinicopathological features. The progression-free survival and overall survival of the entire cohort were closely associated with FIGO stage (p < 0.01), the presence of residual tumour (p < 0.01), and the platinum response (p < 0.01). Molecular classification did not significantly impact prognosis. Univariate analysis revealed that TP53 mutations in advanced-stage (FIGO III-IV) patients were associated with shorter survival. CONCLUSIONS We did not find prognostic significance of TCGA molecular subtyping in OCCC. POLEmuts are extremely rare, and the incidence of MSI-H and p53abn tumours is also quite low. Further subtyping of the NSMP subgroup is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Chen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, the Central Hospital of Minhang District, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Lu Yan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Qin Li
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Shuling Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Ting Hou
- Burning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Huijuan Yang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Shuang Ye
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neilson A, Jamieson A, Chiu D, Leung S, Lum A, Kommoss S, Huntsman DG, Talhouk A, Gilks CB, McAlpine JN. Serum CA125 levels in the context of ProMisE molecular classification provides pre-operative prognostic information that can direct endometrial cancer management. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 193:1-11. [PMID: 39740305 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2024] [Revised: 12/10/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/02/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous research suggests serum CA125 reflects extra-uterine disease in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). Our objective was to determine if CA125 can identify patients with extra-uterine and/or nodal metastases, the association of this biomarker with EC molecular subtype, and to explore an optimal cutoff in this context. METHODS We assessed the association of CA125 levels with clinicopathologic and outcomes data on a cohort of 1107 molecularly classified EC. RESULTS Abnormal CA125 (>35kU/L) was associated with higher stage and lymph node metastases (LNM) in all EC and in each molecular subtype on univariate (p < 0.01) and multivariate (p < 0.05) analyses. POLEmut had the lowest median CA125 level and proportion of CA125 abnormal patients, and p53abn the highest proportion (p < 0.001). CA125 > 35 kU/L had a sensitivity of 0.82, specificity 0.53, positive-predictive-value 0.92, and negative-predictive-value 0.31 for LNM, with similar values for stage>I. CA125 > 35 kU/L was associated with worse overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) in all EC, p53abn (OS, DSS, PFS), NSMP (OS, DSS), and MMRd (OS, DSS) subtypes. CA125 > 35 kU/L demonstrated a relative risk (RR) of 2.50 with presence of stage III/IV disease (p < 0.001) and RR 18.4 for the presence of synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas (SEOC)/co-existing adnexal malignancies (CAM) (p < 0.001). An exploratory cut point, optimized for correlation with DSS (CA125 > 24 kU/L) show similar association with clinical parameters and survival outcome. CONCLUSIONS CA125 levels are associated with molecular subtype, stage>I disease, and SEOC/CAM. CA125 remains a useful clinical tool in the triage of EC in the era of molecular classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Neilson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Amy Jamieson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Derek Chiu
- Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Samuel Leung
- Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amy Lum
- Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Molecular Oncology / Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Molecular Oncology / Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al Assaad M, Hadi K, Tu J, Levine MF, Patel M, Deshpande A, Manohar J, Sigouros M, Sboner A, Chapman-Davis E, Elemento O, Holcomb K, Boyraz B, Mosquera JM. Enhancing the detection of clinically relevant biomarkers in advanced uterine and tubo-ovarian carcinomas through genome-wide analysis. Pathol Res Pract 2024; 266:155773. [PMID: 39673888 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2024] [Accepted: 12/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced-stage tube-ovarian cancers (TOC) and uterine cancers (UC) significantly contribute to cancer mortality. While surgery achieves clinical remission in most cases, recurrence often necessitates systemic therapy. Recent molecular phenotype studies have advanced targeted therapies. We employed whole genome sequencing (WGS) to investigate biomarkers in gynecologic malignancies. DESIGN Ninety-one tumor samples (45 TOC, 46 UC) were analyzed for germline mutations, somatic driver mutations, rearrangements, genome-wide signatures, and molecular phenotypes. A WGS-based high-confidence classifier for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) was applied. Genomic profiles were correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS The HRD phenotype was identified in serous carcinoma components, with 50 % of HRD cases showing BRCA1/2 wildtype (33 %) or variants of unknown significance (17 %). HRD correlated with better overall survival in tubo-ovarian serous carcinoma and was linked to responses to platinum therapy and PARP inhibitors. Endometrioid carcinomas showed no HRD phenotype despite BRCA1/2 variants. CDK12-type genomic instability (10 %) occurred in cases with CDK12 rearrangements, and CCNE1 gain (8 %) was observed in CCNE1-amplified cases, independent of copy number. In endometrioid carcinoma, mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency single base substitution signatures, particularly SBS44, contributed to high tumor mutation burden (TMB). Ultra-high TMB was found in two cases with pathogenic POLE and POLQ mutations, exhibiting multiple SBS signatures, including MMR deficiency. CONCLUSION Comprehensive genomic profiling of advanced-stage TOC and UC via WGS reveals key biomarkers and therapeutic targets, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and advancing personalized medicine in gynecological cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majd Al Assaad
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jiangling Tu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jyothi Manohar
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Sigouros
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Sboner
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eloise Chapman-Davis
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olivier Elemento
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin Holcomb
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Baris Boyraz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juan Miguel Mosquera
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang Y, Zheng YT, Zhang L, Cao XQ, Lin Z, Liu HY, Hu QY. Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma diagnosed during perimenopausal hormone therapy: a case report and literature review. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1440246. [PMID: 39650060 PMCID: PMC11620970 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1440246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 10/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma, one of the three most frequent cancers of the female reproductive system, primarily affects women who are perimenopausal or postmenopausal. Moreover, it is an epithelial cancer that develops in the endometrium, which is classified as either estrogen-dependent (type I) or non-estrogen-dependent (type II). Non-estrogen-dependent endometrial cancers include plasma cell carcinoma and undifferentiated/dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma. Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma is a rare but aggressive endometrial epithelial cancer that lacks any histologic differentiation and is classified as a high-grade endometrial cancer. This case presents that a patient had uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma during perimenopausal hormone therapy, and the patient was treated with sequential estrogen-progestin treatment for 3 years. During that period, she did not undergo a follow-up examination for the last 2 years due to the pandemic. Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma is a special type of endometrial cancer that is not hormone-dependent, and whether the occurrence of this case is related to perimenopausal hormone therapy needs to be verified by more evidence-based clinical cases and further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Qiong-Ying Hu
- The Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), School of Medicine, Taizhou University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Da-Anoy A, Kang EY, Lee CH, Cheasley D, Llaurado Fernandez M, Carey MS, Cameron A, Köbel M. Molecular Surrogate Subtypes of Ovarian and Peritoneal Low-grade Serous Carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2024; 43:617-625. [PMID: 38914014 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000001043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) is an uncommon histotype of ovarian carcinoma, accounting for ~3% of cases. There is evidence that survival of peritoneal LGSC (pLGSC) is longer than that of ovarian LGSC (oLGSC). Key molecular alterations of LGSC have been established, including loss of CDKN2A and PR expression, MAPK pathway alterations, and loss of USP9X expression. We hypothesized that LGSC could be subclassified into clinically applicable molecular subtypes by a few surrogate tests similar to endometrioid carcinomas using a hierarchical decision tree based on the strength of the prognostic associations of the individual alterations. Our study included 71 LGSCs. Immunohistochemistry for CDKN2A, ER, PR, NF1, and USP9X and sequencing for KRAS , NRAS , and BRAF were performed. Our data showed the co-occurrence of key molecular alterations, and despite suggestive trends, hierarchical molecular subtyping did not provide significantly different stratification of patients according to survival in this cohort. We confirmed that patients diagnosed with pLGSC have a longer survival than high-stage oLGSC, with the intriguing observation that normal CDKN2A and PR status were associated with excellent survival in pLGSC. Therefore, CDKN2A and PR status might aid in the classification of indeterminate implants, where abnormal findings favor pLGSC over noninvasive implants. Molecular subtypes should be further evaluated in larger cohorts for their prognostic and potentially predictive value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalyn Da-Anoy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary
| | - Eun Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary
| | - Cheng Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Dane Cheasley
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Marta Llaurado Fernandez
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the Department of Clinical Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | - Mark S Carey
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the Department of Clinical Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | - Anna Cameron
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Garbuzenko OB, Sapiezynski J, Girda E, Rodriguez-Rodriguez L, Minko T. Personalized Versus Precision Nanomedicine for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer. SMALL (WEINHEIM AN DER BERGSTRASSE, GERMANY) 2024; 20:e2307462. [PMID: 38342698 PMCID: PMC11316847 DOI: 10.1002/smll.202307462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
The response to treatment is substantially varied between individual patients with ovarian cancer. However, chemotherapy treatment plans rarely pay sufficient attention to the mentioned factors. Instead, standardized treatment protocols are usually employed for most ovarian cancer patients. Variations in an individual's sensitivity to drugs significantly limit the effectiveness of treatment in some patients and lead to severe toxicities in others. In the present investigation, a nanotechnology-based approach for personalized treatment of ovarian carcinoma (the most lethal type of gynecological cancer) constructed on the individual genetic profile of the patient's tumor is developed and validated. The expression of predefined genes and proteins is analyzed for each patient sample. Finally, a mixture of the complex nanocarrier-based targeted delivery system containing drug(s)/siRNA(s)/targeted peptide is selected from the pre-synthesized bank and tested in vivo on murine cancer model using cancer cells isolated from tumors of each patient. Based on the results of the present study, an innovative approach and protocol for personalized treatment of ovarian cancer are suggested and evaluated. The results of the present study clearly show the advantages and perspectives of the proposed individual treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga B. Garbuzenko
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ USA 08854
| | - Justin Sapiezynski
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ USA 08854
| | - Eugenia Girda
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ USA 08901
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA 08901
| | - Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010
| | - Tamara Minko
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ USA 08854
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA 08901
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gupta S, Ahuja S, Kalwaniya DS. Immunohistochemistry Markers in Ovarian and Fallopian Tube Neoplasms: a Comprehensive Review. Indian J Surg Oncol 2024; 15:465-480. [PMID: 39328739 PMCID: PMC11422544 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-024-02049-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has emerged as a crucial tool in diagnosing and managing ovarian cancer, offering invaluable insights into tumor biology and guiding therapeutic decisions. The intricate histopathological landscape of ovarian cancer presents challenges in accurate diagnosis and classification. IHC offers a complementary approach, aiding in the characterization of tumor subtypes, prognostication, and prediction of treatment response. By targeting specific biomarkers, IHC enables the identification of diverse histological features and molecular alterations associated with ovarian malignancies. The integration of IHC into routine diagnostic workflows enhances diagnostic accuracy, aids in the subclassification of ovarian tumors, and facilitates personalized treatment strategies. Emphasis is placed on the judicious selection of antibody panels tailored to specific clinical scenarios, ensuring optimal utilization of resources and minimizing diagnostic pitfalls. Overall, this review underscores the pivotal role of IHC in refining the diagnosis, prognostication, and management of ovarian cancer, highlighting its significance in the era of precision medicine. By leveraging the molecular insights provided by IHC, clinicians and pathologists can optimize patient care and improve outcomes in ovarian cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumedha Gupta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sana Ahuja
- Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Dheer Singh Kalwaniya
- Department of Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Southworth E, Thomson JP, Croy I, Churchman M, Arends MJ, Hollis RL, Gourley C, Herrington CS. Whole exome sequencing reveals diverse genomic relatedness between paired concurrent endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. Eur J Cancer 2024; 208:114205. [PMID: 38986422 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Concurrent non-serous endometrial and ovarian tumours are often managed clinically as two separate primary tumours, but almost all exhibit evidence of a genomic relationship. METHODOLOGY This study investigates the extent of relatedness using whole exome sequencing, which was performed on paired non-serous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas from 27 patients with concurrent tumours in a cohort with detailed clinicopathological annotation. Four whole exome sequencing-derived parameters (mutation, mutational burden, mutational signatures and mutant allele tumour heterogeneity scores) were used to develop a novel unsupervised model for the assessment of genomic similarity to infer genomic relatedness of paired tumours. RESULTS This novel model demonstrated genomic relatedness across all four parameters in all tumour pairs. Mutations in PTEN, ARID1A, CTNNB1, KMT2D and PIK3CA occurred most frequently and 24 of 27 (89 %) tumour pairs shared identical mutations in at least one of these genes, with all pairs sharing mutations in a number of other genes. Ovarian endometriosis, CTNNB1 exon 3 mutation, and progression and death from disease were present across the similarity ranking. Mismatch repair deficiency was associated with less genomically similar pairs. DISCUSSION Although there was diversity across the cohort, the presence of genomic similarity in all paired tumours supports the hypothesis that concurrent non-serous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas are genomically related and may have arisen from a common origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Southworth
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - John P Thomson
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Ian Croy
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Michael Churchman
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Mark J Arends
- Edinburgh Pathology, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Robert L Hollis
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - C Simon Herrington
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK; Edinburgh Pathology, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kamaraj US, Gautam P, Cheng T, Chin TS, Tay SK, Ho TH, Nadarajah R, Goh RCH, Wong SL, Mantoo S, Busmanis I, Li H, Le MT, Li QJ, Lim EH, Loh YH. Deciphering tumour microenvironment and elucidating the origin of cancer cells in ovarian clear cell carcinoma. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.08.06.606821. [PMID: 39149248 PMCID: PMC11326226 DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.06.606821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) has an East Asian preponderance. It is associated with endometriosis, a benign condition where endometrial (inner lining of the uterus) tissue is found outside the uterus and on the peritoneal surface, in the abdominal or pelvic space. CCC is relatively more resistant to conventional chemotherapy compared to other ovarian cancer subtypes and is associated with a poorer prognosis. In this study, we recruited and obtained tumour tissues from seven patients across the four stages of CCC. The tumour and the tumour microenvironment (TME) from 7 CCC patients spanning clinical stages 1-4 were transcriptionally profiled using high-resolution scRNA-seq to gain insight into CCC's biological mechanisms. Firstly, we built a scRNA-seq resource for the CCC tumour microenvironment (TME). Secondly, we identified the different cell type proportions and found high levels of immune infiltration in CCC. Thirdly, since CCC is associated with endometriosis, we compared CCC with two publicly available endometriosis scRNA-seq datasets. The CCC malignant cells showed similarities with glandular secretory and ciliated epithelial cells found in endometriosis. Finally, we determined the differences in cell-cell communication between various cell types present in CCC TME and endometriosis conditions to gain insights into the transformations in CCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uma S Kamaraj
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Pradeep Gautam
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Terence Cheng
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Tham Su Chin
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Sun Kuie Tay
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608
| | - Tew Hong Ho
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608
| | - Ravichandran Nadarajah
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608
| | - Ronald Chin Hong Goh
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, College Road, Singapore 169856
| | - Shing Lih Wong
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, College Road, Singapore 169856
| | - Sangeeta Mantoo
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, College Road, Singapore 169856
| | - Inny Busmanis
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, College Road, Singapore 169856
| | - Hu Li
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Minh Tn Le
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Qi-Jing Li
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore 138673, Republic of Singapore
| | - Elaine Hsuen Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore 168583
| | - Yuin-Han Loh
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore 138673, Republic of Singapore
- Department of Physiology, NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, 2 Medical Drive, MD9, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- NUS Graduate School's Integrative Sciences and Engineering Programme, National University of Singapore, 28 Medical Drive, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Köbel M, Kang EY, Lee S, Ogilvie T, Terzic T, Wang L, Wiebe NJP, Al‐Shamma Z, Cook LS, Nelson GS, Stewart CJR, von Deimling A, Kommoss FKF, Lee C. Mesonephric-type adenocarcinomas of the ovary: prevalence, diagnostic reproducibility, outcome, and value of PAX2. J Pathol Clin Res 2024; 10:e12389. [PMID: 38970797 PMCID: PMC11227277 DOI: 10.1002/2056-4538.12389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
Mesonephric-type (or -like) adenocarcinomas (MAs) of the ovary are an uncommon and aggressive histotype. They appear to arise through transdifferentiation from Müllerian lesions creating diagnostic challenges. Thus, we aimed to develop a histologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) approach to optimize the identification of MA over its histologic mimics, such as ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC). First, we screened 1,537 ovarian epithelial neoplasms with a four-marker IHC panel of GATA3, TTF1, ER, and PR followed by a morphological review of EC to identify MA in retrospective cohorts. Interobserver reproducibility for the distinction of MA versus EC was assessed in 66 cases initially without and subsequently with IHC information (four-marker panel). Expression of PAX2, CD10, and calretinin was evaluated separately, and survival analyses were performed. We identified 23 MAs from which 22 were among 385 cases initially reported as EC (5.7%) and 1 as clear cell carcinoma. The interobserver reproducibility increased from fair to substantial (κ = 0.376-0.727) with the integration of the four-marker IHC panel. PAX2 was the single most sensitive and specific marker to distinguish MA from EC and could be used as a first-line marker together with ER/PR and GATA3/TTF1. Patients with MA had significantly increased risk of earlier death from disease (hazard ratio = 3.08; 95% CI, 1.62-5.85; p < 0.0001) compared with patients with EC, when adjusted for age, stage, and p53 status. A diagnosis of MA has prognostic implications for stage I disease, and due to the subtlety of morphological features in some tumors, a low threshold for ancillary testing is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Köbel
- Department of PathologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Eun Young Kang
- Department of PathologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Sandra Lee
- Department of PathologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Travis Ogilvie
- Department of PathologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Tatjana Terzic
- Department of PathologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Linyuan Wang
- Department of PathologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | | | | | - Linda S Cook
- Department of CSPH‐EpidemiologyUniversity of Colorado‐AnschutzAuroraCOUSA
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Colin JR Stewart
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, King Edward Memorial HospitalSubiacoWAAustralia
- School for Women's and Infants’ HealthUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthWAAustralia
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of NeuropathologyHeidelberg University Hospital and CCU Neuropathology DKFZHeidelbergGermany
| | - Felix KF Kommoss
- Department of PathologyHeidelberg University HospitalHeidelbergGermany
| | - Cheng‐Han Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABCanada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Parra-Herran C, Dundr P, McCluggage WG. Editorial: Infiltrative pattern of invasion is independently associated with shorter survival and desmoplastic stroma markers FAP and THBS2 in mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Histopathology 2024; 84:1092-1094. [PMID: 38655820 DOI: 10.1111/his.15181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pavel Dundr
- Department of Pathology, First Medical Faculty Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yin Z, Wang M. Real-world study of lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2024; 50:663-670. [PMID: 38332458 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence on the role of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is limited to less common histology subtypes of epithelial advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019. Patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer were included and divided into two groups based on whether they received retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. The primary outcomes are overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS Among the 10 184 included patients, 5472 patients underwent debulking surgery with retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy, while 4712 patients only underwent debulking surgery. No differences were found in the baseline information between the two groups after propensity score matching. Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy during debulking surgery was associated with improved 5-year OS (43.41% vs. 37.49%, p < 0.001) and 5-year CSS (46.43% vs. 41.79%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis further validate the retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy increased the 5-year OS and CSS in patients with high-grade serous cancer. Although the results were not validated in the less common ovarian cancer (including endometrial cancer, mucinous cancer, low-grade serous cancer, and clear cell cancer), the tendency showed patients with the above four subtypes may benefit from the lymphadenectomy which is restricted for small sample size after propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy could further improve the survival outcome during debulking surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The conclusion was affected by the histology subtypes of ovarian cancer and further studies are needed to validate the conclusion in less common ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziran Yin
- University Hospital Leipzig and Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ming Wang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University. Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gatius S, Matias Guiu X, Davidson B. Molecular features for timely cancer diagnosis and treatment - tumors of the ovary, fallopian tube and endometrium. Virchows Arch 2024; 484:339-351. [PMID: 38099957 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03710-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Gynecologic pathology has moved, within only a few years, from being a diagnostic area devoid of molecular testing into a diagnostic discipline in which such analyses are becoming routine. The direct relevance of molecular characterization to the choice of treatment of patients with carcinomas originating in both the uterus and adnexae makes it likely that such testing will only expand along with our understanding of the molecular make-up of these tumors. As a consequence, gynecologic pathologists have become an integral part of patient management, rather than lab personnel providing external services.In parallel, molecular testing is expanding as a tool for diagnosing rare tumors affecting these organs, including soft tissue tumors, sex cord-stromal tumors and germ cell tumors, as well as other rare entities. Increased knowledge in this area bears directly on the ability to diagnose these tumors in a reproducible manner, as well as recognize and consult on genetic diseases. Hopefully, despite the inherent difficulty in studying rare cancers, it will also translate into new therapeutic options for the malignant ones among these rare cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Gatius
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, Lleida, Spain.
| | - Xavier Matias Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, Lleida, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ben Davidson
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital Montebello, Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310, Oslo, Norway.
- University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, N-0316, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Herrington CS, Oswald AJ, Stillie LJ, Croy I, Churchman M, Hollis RL. Compartment-specific multiomic profiling identifies SRC and GNAS as candidate drivers of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in ovarian carcinosarcoma. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:327-335. [PMID: 38097740 PMCID: PMC10803731 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02508-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) is an exceptionally aggressive and understudied ovarian cancer type harbouring distinct carcinomatous and sarcomatous compartments. Here, we seek to identify shared and compartment-specific events that may represent potential therapeutic targets and candidate drivers of sarcomatous compartment formation through epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). METHODS We performed multiomic profiling (exome sequencing, RNA-sequencing, microRNA profiling) of paired carcinomatous and sarcomatous components in 12 OCS cases. RESULTS While paired sarcomatous and carcinomatous compartments demonstrate substantial genomic similarities, multiple loci are recurrently copy number-altered between components; regions containing GNAS and SRC are recurrently gained within the sarcomatous compartment. CCNE1 gain is a common event in OCS, occurring more frequently than in high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). Transcriptomic analysis suggests increased MAPK activity and subtype switching toward poor prognosis HGSOC-derived transcriptomic subtypes within the sarcomatous component. The two compartments show global differences in microRNA profiles, with differentially expressed microRNAs targeting EMT-related genes (SIRT1, ZEB2) and regulators of pro-tumourigenic pathways (TGFβ, NOTCH); chrX is a highly enriched target of these microRNAs and is also frequently deleted across samples. The sarcomatous component harbours significantly fewer CD8-positive cells, suggesting poorer immune engagement. CONCLUSION CCNE1 gain and chrX loss are frequent in OCS. SRC gain, increased GNAS expression and microRNA dysregulation represent potential mechanisms driving sarcomatous compartment formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Simon Herrington
- The Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ailsa J Oswald
- The Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lorna J Stillie
- The Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre and Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ian Croy
- The Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Michael Churchman
- The Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert L Hollis
- The Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sowamber R, Lukey A, Huntsman D, Hanley G. Ovarian Cancer: From Precursor Lesion Identification to Population-Based Prevention Programs. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:10179-10194. [PMID: 38132375 PMCID: PMC10742141 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30120741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a heterogeneous group of malignancies, including high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC). HGSC is often diagnosed at advanced stages and is linked to TP53 variants. While BRCA variants elevate risk, most HGSC cases occur in individuals without known genetic variants, necessitating prevention strategies for people without known high-risk genetic variants. Effective prevention programs are also needed due to the lack of traditional screening options. An emerging primary prevention strategy is opportunistic salpingectomy, which involves removing fallopian tubes during another planned pelvic surgery. Opportunistic salpingectomy offers a safe and cost-effective preventative option that is gaining global adoption. With the publication of the first cohort study of patients who underwent salpingectomy, specifically for cancer prevention, attention has turned to broadening opportunities for salpingectomy in addition to more targeted approaches. Prevention opportunities are promising with increasing adoption of salpingectomy and the increased understanding of the etiology of the distinct histotypes of ovarian cancer. Yet, further research on targeted risk-reducing salpingectomy with thoughtful consideration of equity is necessary to reduce death and suffering from ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramlogan Sowamber
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada;
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Alexandra Lukey
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada;
| | - David Huntsman
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada;
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Gillian Hanley
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ye W, Wang Q, Lu Y. Construction and validation of prognostic nomogram and clinical characteristics for ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: an SEER-based cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:13607-13618. [PMID: 37515614 PMCID: PMC10590339 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05172-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) is the second most commonly occurring ovarian epithelial malignancy, but the associated prognostic factors remain obscure. This study aimed to analyze independent prognostic factors for patients with OEC and to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of these patients. METHODS Clinical information of patients with OEC (2000-2019) was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors, and nomogram models were constructed using independent prognostic factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to verify the accuracy and validity of the nomogram. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the differences in OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) among subgroups. RESULTS A total of 4628 patients with OEC were included, being divided into training (n = 3238) and validation (n = 1390) sets (7:3 ratio). On multivariate Cox analysis, AJCC stage, age, tumor size, differentiation, chemotherapy, and lymph node resection were significant predictors of survival outcomes (P < 0.05). Resection of 1-3 lymph nodes in early-stage OEC patients did not significantly prolong OS (P > 0.05), but resection of ≥ 4 lymph nodes in early-stage improved OS and CSS (P < 0.05). The OS of early-stage patients was not related to whether or not they received chemotherapy (P > 0.05). Lymph node resection and chemotherapy significantly improved the prognosis of patients with advanced OEC (P < 0.05). The c-index of nomogram prediction model was 0.782. ROC with good discrimination, calibration plots with high consistency, and DCA with large net benefit rate result in large clinical value. CONCLUSION AJCC stage, differentiation, tumor size, age, chemotherapy, and lymph node dissection were prognostic factors of OEC. The constructed nomogram prediction model can effectively predict the prognosis of OEC patients and improve the accuracy of clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanlu Ye
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110003, Liaoning, China
| | - Qing Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110003, Liaoning, China
| | - Yanming Lu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110003, Liaoning, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Heinze K, Cairns ES, Thornton S, Harris B, Milne K, Grube M, Meyer C, Karnezis AN, Fereday S, Garsed DW, Leung SC, Chiu DS, Moubarak M, Harter P, Heitz F, McAlpine JN, DeFazio A, Bowtell DD, Goode EL, Pike M, Ramus SJ, Pearce CL, Staebler A, Köbel M, Kommoss S, Talhouk A, Nelson BH, Anglesio MS. The Prognostic Effect of Immune Cell Infiltration Depends on Molecular Subtype in Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3471-3483. [PMID: 37339172 PMCID: PMC10472107 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) is the second most-common type of ovarian carcinoma, comprising 10%-20% of cases. Recently, the study of ENOC has benefitted from comparisons to endometrial carcinomas including defining ENOC with four prognostic molecular subtypes. Each subtype suggests differential mechanisms of progression, although tumor-initiating events remain elusive. There is evidence that the ovarian microenvironment may be critical to early lesion establishment and progression. However, while immune infiltrates have been well studied in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, studies in ENOC are limited. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We report on 210 ENOC, with clinical follow-up and molecular subtype annotation. Using multiplex IHC and immunofluorescence, we examine the prevalence of T-cell lineage, B-cell lineage, macrophages, and populations with programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed death-ligand 1 across subtypes of ENOC. RESULTS Immune cell infiltrates in tumor epithelium and stroma showed higher densities in ENOC subtypes with known high mutation burden (POLEmut and MMRd). While molecular subtypes were prognostically significant, immune infiltrates were not (overall survival P > 0.2). Analysis by molecular subtype revealed that immune cell density was prognostically significant in only the no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subtype, where immune infiltrates lacking B cells (TILB minus) had inferior outcome (disease-specific survival: HR, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-14.7; P < 0.05). Similar to endometrial carcinomas, molecular subtype stratification was generally superior to immune response in predicting outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Subtype stratification is critical for better understanding of ENOC, in particular the distribution and prognostic significance of immune cell infiltrates. The role of B cells in the immune response within NSMP tumors warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolin Heinze
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Evan S. Cairns
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Shelby Thornton
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Bronwyn Harris
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Katy Milne
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Charlotte Meyer
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anthony N. Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dale W. Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samuel C.Y. Leung
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Derek S. Chiu
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Malak Moubarak
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
- Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jessica N. McAlpine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anna DeFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David D.L. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Malcolm Pike
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
| | - C. Leigh Pearce
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Brad H. Nelson
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chen S, Lu H, Jiang S, Li M, Weng H, Zhu J, Zhang T, Wang Y, Zhao W, Wu D, Shen Z, Yang Z, Zhou Y. An analysis of clinical characteristics and prognosis of endometrioid ovarian cancer based on the SEER database and two centers in China. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:608. [PMID: 37391693 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11048-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the clinical characteristics and the risk factors related to the unfavorable prognosis of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EOVC) based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and two clinical centers in China. METHODS Data were extracted from the SEER database and two clinical centers in China (2010 ~ 2021), 884 cases and 87 patients with EOVC were selected, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared among the different groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to identify independent prognostic factors related to EOVC. A nomogram was constructed based on the risk factors of the SEER database affecting prognosis and the discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were evaluated by C-index and calibration curves. RESULTS The average age at diagnosis of patients with EOVC in the SEER database and two centers in China was 55.77 ± 12.40 years and 47.14 ± 11.50 years, 84.7% and 66.6% of them were diagnosed at FIGO stage I ~ II, respectively. In the SEER database, age over 70 years, advanced FIGO stage, tumor grade 3, only unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were independent risk factors of unfavorable prognosis. In two clinical centers in China, 27.6% of EOVC patients were diagnosed with synchronous endometriosis. Advanced FIGO stage, HE4 > 179 pmol/L and bilateral ovarian involvement significantly correlated with poor OS and PFS in Kaplan-Meier analysis. Body mass index (BMI) < 19.34 kg/m2 was an independent risk factor relating to OS and PFS. Additionally, C-index of internal and external verification for the nomogram were 0.812 and 0.754 respectively, revealing good accuracy and clinical applicability. CONCLUSIONS Most patients were diagnosed at early stage, low grade and had better prognosis. Asian/Pacific Islander and Chinese diagnosed with EOVC were more likely to be younger than whites and blacks. Age, tumor grade and FIGO stage (SEER database) and BMI (two centers) are independent prognostic factors. HE4 appears to be more valuable in prognostic assessment compared with CA125. The nomogram had good discrimination and calibration for predicting prognosis, providing a convenient and reliable tool for clinical decision-making for patients with EOVC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuangfeng Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Huaiwu Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shan Jiang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Min Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Core Facility Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China
| | - Haiyan Weng
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China
| | - Jing Zhu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Core Facility Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China
| | - Tianjiao Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Core Facility Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China
| | - Yingying Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Core Facility Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China
| | - Weidong Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Core Facility Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China
| | - Dabao Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Core Facility Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China
| | - Zhen Shen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Core Facility Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China.
| | - Zhenye Yang
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, CAS Key Laboratory of Innate Immunity and Chronic Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
| | - Ying Zhou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Core Facility Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Köbel M, Kang E, Weir A, Rambau PF, Lee C, Nelson GS, Ghatage P, Meagher NS, Riggan MJ, Alsop J, Anglesio MS, Beckmann MW, Bisinotto C, Boisen M, Boros J, Brand AH, Brooks‐Wilson A, Carney ME, Coulson P, Courtney‐Brooks M, Cushing‐Haugen KL, Cybulski C, Deen S, El‐Bahrawy MA, Elishaev E, Erber R, Fereday S, Fischer A, Gayther SA, Barquin‐Garcia A, Gentry‐Maharaj A, Gilks CB, Gronwald H, Grube M, Harnett PR, Harris HR, Hartkopf AD, Hartmann A, Hein A, Hendley J, Hernandez BY, Huang Y, Jakubowska A, Jimenez‐Linan M, Jones ME, Kennedy CJ, Kluz T, Koziak JM, Lesnock J, Lester J, Lubiński J, Longacre TA, Lycke M, Mateoiu C, McCauley BM, McGuire V, Ney B, Olawaiye A, Orsulic S, Osorio A, Paz‐Ares L, Ramón y Cajal T, Rothstein JH, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Shah M, Sharma R, Sherman ME, Shvetsov YB, Singh N, Steed H, Storr SJ, Talhouk A, Traficante N, Wang C, Whittemore AS, Widschwendter M, Wilkens LR, Winham SJ, Benitez J, Berchuck A, Bowtell DD, Candido dos Reis FJ, Campbell I, Cook LS, DeFazio A, Doherty JA, Fasching PA, Fortner RT, García MJ, Goodman MT, Goode EL, Gronwald J, Huntsman DG, Karlan BY, Kelemen LE, Kommoss S, Le ND, Martin SG, Menon U, Modugno F, Pharoah PDP, Schildkraut JM, Sieh W, Staebler A, Sundfeldt K, Swerdlow AJ, Ramus SJ, Brenton JD. p53 and ovarian carcinoma survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study. J Pathol Clin Res 2023; 9:208-222. [PMID: 36948887 PMCID: PMC10073933 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
Our objective was to test whether p53 expression status is associated with survival for women diagnosed with the most common ovarian carcinoma histotypes (high-grade serous carcinoma [HGSC], endometrioid carcinoma [EC], and clear cell carcinoma [CCC]) using a large multi-institutional cohort from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium. p53 expression was assessed on 6,678 cases represented on tissue microarrays from 25 participating OTTA study sites using a previously validated immunohistochemical (IHC) assay as a surrogate for the presence and functional effect of TP53 mutations. Three abnormal expression patterns (overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic) and the normal (wild type) pattern were recorded. Survival analyses were performed by histotype. The frequency of abnormal p53 expression was 93.4% (4,630/4,957) in HGSC compared to 11.9% (116/973) in EC and 11.5% (86/748) in CCC. In HGSC, there were no differences in overall survival across the abnormal p53 expression patterns. However, in EC and CCC, abnormal p53 expression was associated with an increased risk of death for women diagnosed with EC in multivariate analysis compared to normal p53 as the reference (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-3.47, p = 0.0011) and with CCC (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.22, p = 0.012). Abnormal p53 was also associated with shorter overall survival in The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II EC and CCC. Our study provides further evidence that functional groups of TP53 mutations assessed by abnormal surrogate p53 IHC patterns are not associated with survival in HGSC. In contrast, we validate that abnormal p53 IHC is a strong independent prognostic marker for EC and demonstrate for the first time an independent prognostic association of abnormal p53 IHC with overall survival in patients with CCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
| | - Eun‐Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
| | - Ashley Weir
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical ResearchParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Peter F Rambau
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
- Pathology DepartmentCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences‐BugandoMwanzaTanzania
| | - Cheng‐Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABCanada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Nicola S Meagher
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Marjorie J Riggan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE)University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Christiani Bisinotto
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical SchoolUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
| | - Michelle Boisen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Jessica Boros
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Alison H Brand
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Michael E Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John A. Burns School of MedicineUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Madeleine Courtney‐Brooks
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Kara L Cushing‐Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWAUSA
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Suha Deen
- Department of HistopathologyNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical CentreNottinghamUK
| | - Mona A El‐Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and ReproductionImperial College London, Hammersmith HospitalLondonUK
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - AOCS Group
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Anna Fischer
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | | | - Aleksandra Gentry‐Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials UnitInstitute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Helena Gronwald
- Department of Propaedeutics, Physical Diagnostics and Dental PhysiotherapyPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Paul R Harnett
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer CentreWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Holly R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWAUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWAUSA
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital of UlmUlmGermany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Brenda Y Hernandez
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Yajue Huang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic DiagnosticsPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | | | - Michael E Jones
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsInstitute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow UniversityRzeszówPoland
| | | | - Jaime Lesnock
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Teri A Longacre
- Department of PathologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | - Maria Lycke
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyInstitute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | | | - Bryan M McCauley
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | - Britta Ney
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Alexander Olawaiye
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Ana Osorio
- Genetics Service, Fundación Jiménez DíazMadridSpain
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
| | - Luis Paz‐Ares
- H12O‐CNIO Lung Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
- Oncology DepartmentHospital Universitario 12 de OctubreMadridSpain
| | | | - Joseph H Rothstein
- Department of Genetics and Genomic SciencesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Population Health Science and PolicyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Minouk J Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Mark E Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo ClinicJacksonvilleFLUSA
| | - Yurii B Shvetsov
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABCanada
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, North Zone, Alberta Health ServicesEdmontonABCanada
| | - Sarah J Storr
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research CentreBiodiscovery Institute, University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE)University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
- Department of Biomedical Data ScienceStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | | | - Lynne R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Javier Benitez
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - David D Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Francisco J Candido dos Reis
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical SchoolUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Linda S Cook
- Epidemiology, School of Public HealthUniversity of ColoradoAuroraCOUSA
- Community Health Sciences, University of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUTUSA
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of NorwayOsloNorway
| | - María J García
- Computational Oncology Group, Structural Biology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cedars‐Sinai Cancer, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research CentreVancouverBCCanada
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Division of Acute Disease Epidemiology, South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlColumbiaSCUSA
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer AgencyVancouverBCCanada
| | - Stewart G Martin
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research CentreBiodiscovery Institute, University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials UnitInstitute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Public HealthPittsburghPAUSA
- Women's Cancer Research CenterMagee‐Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer CenterPittsburghPAUSA
| | - Paul DP Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterWest HollywoodCAUSA
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Genetics and Genomic SciencesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Population Health Science and PolicyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical ScienceSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Division of Breast Cancer ResearchThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chen R, An J, Wang Y, Yang L, Lin Q, Wang Y. LINC01589 serves as a potential tumor-suppressor and immune-related biomarker in endometrial cancer: A review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e33536. [PMID: 37058060 PMCID: PMC10101251 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000033536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, increasing attention is being paid to biomarkers in endometrial cancer. Immune infiltration of the tumor microenvironment has been shown to significantly affect the overall survival (OS) of uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) patients. LINC01589 is a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) that is rarely reported in cancer and is assumed to play a role in immune regulation. We therefore evaluated the role of LINC01589 in UCEC using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. We analyzed the expression of LINC01589 using the gene expression profiles of LINC01589 in the UCEC projects in TCGA. Comparisons between the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of the cancer and adjacent normal tissues of the UCEC projects revealed that LINC01589 expression was decreased in UCEC tissues. A multivariate cox regression analysis indicated that LINC01589 upregulation could serve as an independent prognostic factor for survival. Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between LINC01589 expression and B cell, T cell, NK cell, monocytic lineage, and myeloid dendritic cell infiltration in UCEC patients. In addition, 5 clusters of hub genes were detected by comparison of different expression levels of LINC01589 in the UCEC groups. The analysis of the reactome pathway using gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed immune-related pathways, including CD22-mediated B cell receptor (BCR) regulation and antigen-activated BCRs, leading to the generation of second messengers and complement cascade pathways that were significantly enriched in the high LINC01589 expression group. Thus, LINC01589 may serve as a prognostic biomarker, as it is associated with immune infiltration in UCEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruixin Chen
- Department of Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Jian An
- Department of Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Lingling Yang
- Department of Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qingping Lin
- Department of Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yanlong Wang
- Department of Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Meagher NS, Gorringe KL, Wakefield M, Bolithon A, Pang CNI, Chiu DS, Anglesio MS, Mallitt KA, Doherty JA, Harris HR, Schildkraut JM, Berchuck A, Cushing-Haugen KL, Chezar K, Chou A, Tan A, Alsop J, Barlow E, Beckmann MW, Boros J, Bowtell DD, Brand AH, Brenton JD, Campbell I, Cheasley D, Cohen J, Cybulski C, Elishaev E, Erber R, Farrell R, Fischer A, Fu Z, Gilks B, Gill AJ, Gourley C, Grube M, Harnett PR, Hartmann A, Hettiaratchi A, Høgdall CK, Huzarski T, Jakubowska A, Jimenez-Linan M, Kennedy CJ, Kim BG, Kim JW, Kim JH, Klett K, Koziak JM, Lai T, Laslavic A, Lester J, Leung Y, Li N, Liauw W, Lim BW, Linder A, Lubiński J, Mahale S, Mateoiu C, McInerny S, Menkiszak J, Minoo P, Mittelstadt S, Morris D, Orsulic S, Park SY, Pearce CL, Pearson JV, Pike MC, Quinn CM, Mohan GR, Rao J, Riggan MJ, Ruebner M, Salfinger S, Scott CL, Shah M, Steed H, Stewart CJ, Subramanian D, Sung S, Tang K, Timpson P, Ward RL, Wiedenhoefer R, Thorne H, Cohen PA, Crowe P, Fasching PA, Gronwald J, Hawkins NJ, Høgdall E, Huntsman DG, James PA, Karlan BY, Kelemen LE, Kommoss S, Konecny GE, Modugno F, Park SK, Staebler A, Sundfeldt K, Wu AH, Talhouk A, Pharoah PD, Anderson L, DeFazio A, Köbel M, Friedlander ML, Ramus SJ. Gene-Expression Profiling of Mucinous Ovarian Tumors and Comparison with Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Tumors Identifies Markers Associated with Adverse Outcomes. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:5383-5395. [PMID: 36222710 PMCID: PMC9751776 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Advanced-stage mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) has poor chemotherapy response and prognosis and lacks biomarkers to aid stage I adjuvant treatment. Differentiating primary MOC from gastrointestinal (GI) metastases to the ovary is also challenging due to phenotypic similarities. Clinicopathologic and gene-expression data were analyzed to identify prognostic and diagnostic features. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Discovery analyses selected 19 genes with prognostic/diagnostic potential. Validation was performed through the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium and GI cancer biobanks comprising 604 patients with MOC (n = 333), mucinous borderline ovarian tumors (MBOT, n = 151), and upper GI (n = 65) and lower GI tumors (n = 55). RESULTS Infiltrative pattern of invasion was associated with decreased overall survival (OS) within 2 years from diagnosis, compared with expansile pattern in stage I MOC [hazard ratio (HR), 2.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-7.41, P = 0.042]. Increased expression of THBS2 and TAGLN was associated with shorter OS in MOC patients (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04-1.51, P = 0.016) and (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.45, P = 0.043), respectively. ERBB2 (HER2) amplification or high mRNA expression was evident in 64 of 243 (26%) of MOCs, but only 8 of 243 (3%) were also infiltrative (4/39, 10%) or stage III/IV (4/31, 13%). CONCLUSIONS An infiltrative growth pattern infers poor prognosis within 2 years from diagnosis and may help select stage I patients for adjuvant therapy. High expression of THBS2 and TAGLN in MOC confers an adverse prognosis and is upregulated in the infiltrative subtype, which warrants further investigation. Anti-HER2 therapy should be investigated in a subset of patients. MOC samples clustered with upper GI, yet markers to differentiate these entities remain elusive, suggesting similar underlying biology and shared treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola S. Meagher
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kylie L. Gorringe
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Wakefield
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adelyn Bolithon
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chi Nam Ignatius Pang
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Bioinformatics Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Derek S. Chiu
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kylie-Ann Mallitt
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer A. Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Holly R. Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Joellen M. Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kara L. Cushing-Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ksenia Chezar
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Angela Chou
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adeline Tan
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- Western Women's Pathology, Western Diagnostic Pathology, Wembley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ellen Barlow
- Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jessica Boros
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David D.L. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Alison H. Brand
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James D. Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dane Cheasley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joshua Cohen
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rhonda Farrell
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anna Fischer
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Zhuxuan Fu
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anthony J. Gill
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Charlie Gourley
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Paul R. Harnett
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anusha Hettiaratchi
- The Health Precincts Biobank (formerly the Health Science Alliance Biobank), UNSW Biospecimen Services, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Claus K. Høgdall
- Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Catherine J. Kennedy
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Byoung-Gie Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Hoon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kayla Klett
- Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Tiffany Lai
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Angela Laslavic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yee Leung
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
- Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Na Li
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Winston Liauw
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Cancer Care Centre, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Belle W.X. Lim
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Linder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inst of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Sakshi Mahale
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Constantina Mateoiu
- Department of Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Simone McInerny
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Janusz Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Parham Minoo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Suzana Mittelstadt
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - David Morris
- St George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sang-Yoon Park
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Celeste Leigh Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - John V. Pearson
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Malcolm C. Pike
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Carmel M. Quinn
- The Health Precincts Biobank (formerly the Health Science Alliance Biobank), UNSW Biospecimen Services, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ganendra Raj Mohan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jianyu Rao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Marjorie J. Riggan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stuart Salfinger
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Clare L. Scott
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, North Zone, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Colin J.R. Stewart
- School for Women's and Infants' Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Soseul Sung
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Katrina Tang
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul Timpson
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn L. Ward
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebekka Wiedenhoefer
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Heather Thorne
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Paul A. Cohen
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Philip Crowe
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Nicholas J. Hawkins
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Estrid Høgdall
- Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - David G. Huntsman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul A. James
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Beth Y. Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Linda E. Kelemen
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gottfried E. Konecny
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sue K. Park
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inst of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna H. Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Aline Talhouk
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Lyndal Anderson
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Michael L. Friedlander
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gilks CB, Selinger CI, Davidson B, Köbel M, Ledermann JA, Lim D, Malpica A, Mikami Y, Singh N, Srinivasan R, Vang R, Lax SF, McCluggage WG. Data Set for the Reporting of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:S119-S142. [PMID: 36305537 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The move toward consistent and comprehensive surgical pathology reports for cancer resection specimens has been a key development in supporting evidence-based patient management and consistent cancer staging. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) previously developed a data set for reporting of the ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinomas which was published in 2015. In this paper, we provide an update on this data set, as a second edition, that reflects changes in the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumours as well as some other minor modifications. The data set has been developed by a panel of internationally recognized expert pathologists and a clinician and consists of "core" and "noncore" elements to be included in surgical pathology reports, with detailed commentary to guide users, including references. This data set replaces the widely used first edition, and will facilitate consistent and accurate case reporting, data collection for quality assurance and research, and allow for comparison of epidemiological and pathologic parameters between different populations.
Collapse
|
24
|
Yang Y, Zhao T, Chen Q, Li Y, Xiao Z, Xiang Y, Wang B, Qiu Y, Tu S, Jiang Y, Nan Y, Huang Q, Ai K. Nanomedicine Strategies for Heating "Cold" Ovarian Cancer (OC): Next Evolution in Immunotherapy of OC. ADVANCED SCIENCE (WEINHEIM, BADEN-WURTTEMBERG, GERMANY) 2022; 9:e2202797. [PMID: 35869032 PMCID: PMC9534959 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202202797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, dramatically improving survival rates of melanoma and lung cancer patients. Nevertheless, immunotherapy is almost ineffective against ovarian cancer (OC) due to its cold tumor immune microenvironment (TIM). Many traditional medications aimed at remodeling TIM are often associated with severe systemic toxicity, require frequent dosing, and show only modest clinical efficacy. In recent years, emerging nanomedicines have demonstrated extraordinary immunotherapeutic effects for OC by reversing the TIM because the physical and biochemical features of nanomedicines can all be harnessed to obtain optimal and expected tissue distribution and cellular uptake. However, nanomedicines are far from being widely explored in the field of OC immunotherapy due to the lack of appreciation for the professional barriers of nanomedicine and pathology, limiting the horizons of biomedical researchers and materials scientists. Herein, a typical cold tumor-OC is adopted as a paradigm to introduce the classification of TIM, the TIM characteristics of OC, and the advantages of nanomedicines for immunotherapy. Subsequently, current nanomedicines are comprehensively summarized through five general strategies to substantially enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy by heating the cold OC. Finally, the challenges and perspectives of this expanding field for improved development of clinical applications are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqi Yang
- Department of PharmacyXiangya HospitalCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410008P. R. China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric DisordersXiangya HospitalCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410008P. R. China
| | - Tianjiao Zhao
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular ResearchXiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
| | - Qiaohui Chen
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular ResearchXiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
| | - Yumei Li
- Department of Assisted ReproductionXiangya HospitalCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410008P. R. China
| | - Zuoxiu Xiao
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular ResearchXiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
| | - Yuting Xiang
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular ResearchXiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
| | - Boyu Wang
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular ResearchXiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
| | - Yige Qiu
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular ResearchXiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
| | - Shiqi Tu
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular ResearchXiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
| | - Yitian Jiang
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular ResearchXiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
| | - Yayun Nan
- Geriatric Medical CenterPeople's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous RegionYinchuanNingxia750002P. R. China
| | - Qiong Huang
- Department of PharmacyXiangya HospitalCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410008P. R. China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric DisordersXiangya HospitalCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410008P. R. China
| | - Kelong Ai
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular ResearchXiangya School of Pharmaceutical SciencesCentral South UniversityChangshaHunan410078P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Praetorius TH, Leonova A, Lac V, Senz J, Tessier-Cloutier B, Nazeran TM, Köbel M, Grube M, Kraemer B, Yong PJ, Kommoss S, Anglesio MS. Molecular analysis suggests oligoclonality and metastasis of endometriosis lesions across anatomically defined subtypes. Fertil Steril 2022; 118:524-534. [PMID: 35715244 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the heterogeneity of somatic cancer-driver mutations within patients and across endometriosis types. DESIGN A single-center cohort, retrospective study. SETTING Tertiary specialist-care center at a university hospital. PATIENT(S) Patients with surgically and histologically confirmed endometriosis of at least 2 anatomically distinct types (ovarian, deep infiltrating, and superficial). INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Specimens were analyzed for the presence or absence of somatic cancer-driver mutations using targeted panel sequencing with orthogonal validation using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and mutation-surrogate immunohistochemistry. RESULT(S) It was found that 13 of 27 patients had informative somatic driver mutations in endometriosis lesions; of these 13 patients, 9 had identical mutations across distinct lesions. Endometriomas showed a higher mutational complexity, with functionally redundant driver mutations in the same gene and within the same lesions. CONCLUSION(S) Our data are consistent with clonality across endometriosis lesions, regardless of subtype. Further, the finding of redundancy in mutations within the same gene and lesions is consistent with endometriosis representing an oligoclonal disease with dissemination likely to consist of multiple epithelial clones traveling together. This suggests that the current anatomically defined classification of endometriosis does not fully recognize the etiology of the disease. A novel classification should consider genomic and other molecular features to promote personalized endometriosis diagnosis and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa H Praetorius
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany; British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Anna Leonova
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Vivian Lac
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Janine Senz
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Basile Tessier-Cloutier
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Tayyebeh M Nazeran
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Kraemer
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Paul J Yong
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; BC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain & Endometriosis, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Thompson EF, Hoang L, Höhn AK, Palicelli A, Talia KL, Tchrakian N, Senz J, Rusike R, Jordan S, Jamieson A, Huvila J, McAlpine JN, Gilks CB, Höckel M, Singh N, Horn LC. Molecular subclassification of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: reproducibility and prognostic significance of a novel surgical technique. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:977-985. [PMID: 35764349 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma is subclassified into three prognostically relevant groups: (i) human papillomavirus (HPV) associated, (ii) HPV independent p53 abnormal (mutant pattern), and (iii) HPV independent p53 wild type. Immunohistochemistry for p16 and p53 serve as surrogates for HPV viral integration and TP53 mutational status. We assessed the reproducibility of the subclassification based on p16 and p53 immunohistochemistry and evaluated the prognostic significance of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma molecular subgroups in a patient cohort treated by vulvar field resection surgery. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, 68 cases treated by vulvar field resection were identified from the Leipzig School of Radical Pelvic Surgery. Immunohistochemistry for p16 and p53 was performed at three different institutions and evaluated independently by seven pathologists and two trainees. Tumors were classified into one of four groups: HPV associated, HPV independent p53 wild type, HPV independent p53 abnormal, and indeterminate. Selected cases were further interrogated by (HPV RNA in situ hybridization, TP53 sequencing). RESULTS Final subclassification yielded 22 (32.4%) HPV associated, 41 (60.3%) HPV independent p53 abnormal, and 5 (7.3%) HPV independent p53 wild type tumors. Interobserver agreement (overall Fleiss' kappa statistic) for the four category classification was 0.74. No statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between HPV associated and HPV independent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma were observed. CONCLUSION Interobserver reproducibility of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma subclassification based on p16 and p53 immunohistochemistry may support routine use in clinical practice. Vulvar field resection surgery showed no significant difference in clinical outcomes when stratified based on HPV status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily F Thompson
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lynn Hoang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anne Kathrin Höhn
- Division of Gynecologic Pathology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andrea Palicelli
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Karen L Talia
- Royal Women's Hospital and VCS Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nairi Tchrakian
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Janine Senz
- Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Amy Jamieson
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jutta Huvila
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael Höckel
- Leipzig School of Radical Pelvis Surgery, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Naveena Singh
- Cellular Pathology, Barts Health and NHS Trust and Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Heinze K, Nazeran TM, Lee S, Krämer P, Cairns ES, Chiu DS, Leung SC, Kang EY, Meagher NS, Kennedy CJ, Boros J, Kommoss F, Vollert HW, Heitze F, du Bois A, Harter P, Grube M, Kraemer B, Staebler A, Kommoss FK, Heublein S, Sinn HP, Singh N, Laslavic A, Elishaev E, Olawaiye A, Moysich K, Modugno F, Sharma R, Brand AH, Harnett PR, DeFazio A, Fortner RT, Lubinski J, Lener M, Tołoczko-Grabarek A, Cybulski C, Gronwald H, Gronwald J, Coulson P, El-Bahrawy MA, Jones ME, Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Gorringe KL, Campbell I, Cook L, Gayther SA, Carney ME, Shvetsov YB, Hernandez BY, Wilkens LR, Goodman MT, Mateoiu C, Linder A, Sundfeldt K, Kelemen LE, Gentry-Maharaj A, Widschwendter M, Menon U, Bolton KL, Alsop J, Shah M, Jimenez-Linan M, Pharoah PD, Brenton JD, Cushing-Haugen KL, Harris HR, Doherty JA, Gilks B, Ghatage P, Huntsman DG, Nelson GS, Tinker AV, Lee CH, Goode EL, Nelson BH, Ramus SJ, Kommoss S, Talhouk A, Köbel M, Anglesio MS. Validated biomarker assays confirm that ARID1A loss is confounded with MMR deficiency, CD8 + TIL infiltration, and provides no independent prognostic value in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas. J Pathol 2022; 256:388-401. [PMID: 34897700 PMCID: PMC9544180 DOI: 10.1002/path.5849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
ARID1A (BAF250a) is a component of the SWI/SNF chromatin modifying complex, plays an important tumour suppressor role, and is considered prognostic in several malignancies. However, in ovarian carcinomas there are contradictory reports on its relationship to outcome, immune response, and correlation with clinicopathological features. We assembled a series of 1623 endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas, including 1078 endometrioid (ENOC) and 545 clear cell (CCOC) ovarian carcinomas, through combining resources of the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) Consortium, the Canadian Ovarian Unified Experimental Resource (COEUR), local, and collaborative networks. Validated immunohistochemical surrogate assays for ARID1A mutations were applied to all samples. We investigated associations between ARID1A loss/mutation, clinical features, outcome, CD8+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8+ TILs), and DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). ARID1A loss was observed in 42% of CCOCs and 25% of ENOCs. We found no associations between ARID1A loss and outcomes, stage, age, or CD8+ TIL status in CCOC. Similarly, we found no association with outcome or stage in endometrioid cases. In ENOC, ARID1A loss was more prevalent in younger patients (p = 0.012) and was associated with MMRd (p < 0.001) and the presence of CD8+ TILs (p = 0.008). Consistent with MMRd being causative of ARID1A mutations, in a subset of ENOCs we also observed an association with ARID1A loss-of-function mutation as a result of small indels (p = 0.035, versus single nucleotide variants). In ENOC, the association with ARID1A loss, CD8+ TILs, and age appears confounded by MMRd status. Although this observation does not explicitly rule out a role for ARID1A influence on CD8+ TIL infiltration in ENOC, given current knowledge regarding MMRd, it seems more likely that effects are dominated by the hypermutation phenotype. This large dataset with consistently applied biomarker assessment now provides a benchmark for the prevalence of ARID1A loss-of-function mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers and brings clarity to the prognostic significance. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolin Heinze
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Tayyebeh M. Nazeran
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sandra Lee
- University of Calgary, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Pauline Krämer
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University Hospital Tübingen, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Evan S. Cairns
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Derek S. Chiu
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samuel C.Y. Leung
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Eun Young Kang
- University of Calgary, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Nicola S. Meagher
- University of New South Wales, Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Catherine J. Kennedy
- The University of Sydney, Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jessica Boros
- The University of Sydney, Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Friedrich Kommoss
- Medizin Campus Bodensee, Institute of Pathology, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Hans-Walter Vollert
- Medizin Campus Bodensee, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Florian Heitze
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Marcel Grube
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University Hospital Tübingen, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Kraemer
- University Hospital Tübingen, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Annette Staebler
- University Hospital Tübingen, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Felix K.F. Kommoss
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabine Heublein
- University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Naveena Singh
- Barts Health National Health Service Trust, Department of Pathology, London, UK
| | - Angela Laslavic
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, PA, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, PA, USA
| | - Alex Olawaiye
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, PA, USA
| | - Kirsten Moysich
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, PA, USA
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Westmead Hospital, Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alison H. Brand
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul R. Harnett
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The University of Sydney, Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Renée T. Fortner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Marcin Lener
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Tołoczko-Grabarek
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Helena Gronwald
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Propaedeutics, Physical Diagnostics and Dental Physiotherapy, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Penny Coulson
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, London, UK
| | - Mona A El-Bahrawy
- Imperial College London, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michael E. Jones
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, London, UK
| | - Minouk J. Schoemaker
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, London, UK
| | - Anthony J. Swerdlow
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Breast Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Kylie L. Gorringe
- The University of Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Women’s Cancer Program, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ian Campbell
- The University of Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Research Division, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Linda Cook
- The University of New Mexico, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Simon A. Gayther
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael E. Carney
- John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, HI, USA
| | - Yurii B. Shvetsov
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Epidemiology Program, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | | | - Lynne R. Wilkens
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Epidemiology Program, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Marc T. Goodman
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Constantina Mateoiu
- Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Linder
- Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Linda E. Kelemen
- Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, UK
- University College London, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, London, UK
| | | | - Usha Menon
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, UK
| | - Kelly L. Bolton
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Division of Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mitul Shah
- Addenbrookes Hospital, Department of Histopathology, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - James D. Brenton
- University of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kara L. Cushing-Haugen
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Holly R. Harris
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jennifer A. Doherty
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Blake Gilks
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- University of Calgary, Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - David G. Huntsman
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gregg S. Nelson
- University of Calgary, Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Anna V. Tinker
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Department of Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- University of Alberta, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brad H. Nelson
- Trev & Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- University of New South Wales, Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- University Hospital Tübingen, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Aline Talhouk
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- University of Calgary, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Similä-Maarala J, Soovares P, Pasanen A, Ahvenainen T, Vahteristo P, Bützow R, Lassus H. TCGA molecular classification in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas: Novel data on clear cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 165:577-584. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
29
|
Rajendran S, McCluggage WG. WT1 Positive Ovarian Endometrioid Tumors: Observations From Consult Cases and Strategies for Distinguishing From Serous Neoplasms. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:191-202. [PMID: 33782345 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma, more than any other type of ovarian epithelial malignancy, demonstrates a varied morphology which can cause problems in diagnosis. In tubo-ovarian tumor pathology, WT1 is a commonly used marker as it is consistently expressed in low-grade and high-grade serous carcinomas and is often considered a specific marker of a serous phenotype. However, ovarian endometrioid neoplasms may also express WT1 which may contribute to misdiagnosis. We report our experience with 23 ovarian endometrioid neoplasms (4 borderline tumors, 19 carcinomas), mainly received in consultation, which were WT1 positive (diffuse in 11 cases) which often contributed to misdiagnosis. Endometriosis was identified in the same ovary in 6 cases and squamous elements in 7. We describe strategies for distinguishing such neoplasms, which may exhibit morphologic overlap with serous tumors, from low-grade and high-grade serous carcinomas and stress that a diagnosis of HGSC is unlikely with two grossly and histologically normal fallopian tubes. We also stress that a panel of markers should always be used rather than relying on a single marker and that when the morphology is classical of an endometrioid carcinoma, diagnostic immunohistochemistry is not needed given the potential for confusion in cases showing "aberrant" staining. We also discuss the phenomenon of "aberrant" immunohistochemical staining in endometrioid carcinomas which appears more common than in other ovarian carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Rajendran
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK (S.R., W.G.M.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
The Evolution of Ovarian Carcinoma Subclassification. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020416. [PMID: 35053578 PMCID: PMC8774015 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Historically, cancers presenting with their main tumor mass in the ovary have been classified as ovarian carcinomas (a concise term for epithelial ovarian cancer) and treated with a one-size-fits-all approach. Over the last two decades, a growing molecular understanding established that ovarian carcinomas consist of several distinct histologic types, which practically represent different diseases. Further research is now delineating several molecular subtypes within each histotype. This histotype/molecular subtype subclassification provides a framework of grouping tumors based on molecular similarities for research, clinical trial inclusion and future patient management. Abstract The phenotypically informed histotype classification remains the mainstay of ovarian carcinoma subclassification. Histotypes of ovarian epithelial neoplasms have evolved with each edition of the WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumours. The current fifth edition (2020) lists five principal histotypes: high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), mucinous carcinoma (MC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC) and clear cell carcinoma (CCC). Since histotypes arise from different cells of origin, cell lineage-specific diagnostic immunohistochemical markers and histotype-specific oncogenic alterations can confirm the morphological diagnosis. A four-marker immunohistochemical panel (WT1/p53/napsin A/PR) can distinguish the five principal histotypes with high accuracy, and additional immunohistochemical markers can be used depending on the diagnostic considerations. Histotypes are further stratified into molecular subtypes and assessed with predictive biomarker tests. HGSCs have recently been subclassified based on mechanisms of chromosomal instability, mRNA expression profiles or individual candidate biomarkers. ECs are composed of the same molecular subtypes (POLE-mutated/mismatch repair-deficient/no specific molecular profile/p53-abnormal) with the same prognostic stratification as their endometrial counterparts. Although methylation analyses and gene expression and sequencing showed at least two clusters, the molecular subtypes of CCCs remain largely elusive to date. Mutational and immunohistochemical data on LGSC have suggested five molecular subtypes with prognostic differences. While our understanding of the molecular composition of ovarian carcinomas has significantly advanced and continues to evolve, the need for treatment options suitable for these alterations is becoming more obvious. Further preclinical studies using histotype-defined and molecular subtype-characterized model systems are needed to expand the therapeutic spectrum for women diagnosed with ovarian carcinomas.
Collapse
|
31
|
Buza N. Immunohistochemistry in gynecologic carcinomas: Practical update with diagnostic and clinical considerations based on the 2020 WHO classification of tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol 2021; 39:58-77. [PMID: 34750021 DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2021.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
This review provides an update on immunohistochemistry applications-diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive-in the pathology evaluation of gynecologic carcinomas. The 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumors introduced important changes in the diagnostic classification of lower genital tract, endometrial, and ovarian carcinomas, with major influence on the routine pathology practice. Lower genital tract carcinomas and their precursor lesions are now classified based on their human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated and HPV-independent pathogenesis, reflecting the clinically significant prognostic differences and impacting the therapeutic decision-making. Immunohistochemical markers have an increasing role in the pathology evaluation of endometrial carcinomas: in addition to their traditional use in the differential diagnosis and histologic subtyping, they have also been recently advocated for prognostic classification as surrogates for the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) molecular groups. New entities - mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma and gastric (gastrointestinal)-type mucinous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium - have also been added and often require immunostains for diagnostic confirmation. Ovarian carcinomas frequently show overlapping morphologic patterns and heterogeneous appearance within the same tumor, necessitating immunohistochemical work-up. Beyond diagnostic applications, there is increasing clinical demand for screening of inherited cancer syndromes, prediction of prognosis and guiding targeted therapy. Practical issues and pitfalls related to mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry, HER2, and PD-L1 testing are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Buza
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rodriguez M, Kang EY, Farrington K, Cook LS, Le ND, Karnezis AN, Lee CH, Nelson GS, Terzic T, Lee S, Köbel M. Accurate Distinction of Ovarian Clear Cell From Endometrioid Carcinoma Requires Integration of Phenotype, Immunohistochemical Predictions, and Genotype: Implications for Lynch Syndrome Screening. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:1452-1463. [PMID: 34534137 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) are both associated with endometriosis but differ in histologic phenotype, biomarker profile, and survival. Our objectives were to refine immunohistochemical (IHC) panels that help distinguish the histotypes and reassess the prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) in immunohistochemically confirmed OCCC. We selected 8 candidate IHC markers to develop first-line and second-line panels in a training set of 344 OCCC/OEC cases. Interobserver reproducibility of histotype diagnosis was assessed in an independent testing cohort of 100 OCC/OEC initially without and subsequently with IHC. The prevalence of MMRd was evaluated using the testing cohort and an expansion set of 844 ovarian carcinomas. The 2 prototypical combinations (OCCC: Napsin A+/HNF1B diffusely+/PR-; OEC: Napsin A-/HNF1B nondiffuse/PR+) occurred in 75% of cases and were 100% specific. A second-line panel (ELAPOR1, AMACR, CDX2) predicted the remaining cases with 83% accuracy. Integration of IHC improved interobserver reproducibility (κ=0.778 vs. 0.882, P<0.0001). The prevalence of MMRd was highest in OEC (11.5%, 44/383), lower in OCCC (1.7%, 5/297), and high-grade serous carcinomas (0.7%, 5/699), and absent in mucinous (0/126) and low-grade serous carcinomas (0/50). All 5 MMRd OCCC were probable Lynch syndrome cases with prototypical IHC profile but ambiguous morphologic features: 3/5 with microcystic architecture and 2/5 with intratumoral stromal inflammation. Integration of first-line and second-line IHC panels increases diagnostic precision and enhances prognostication and triaging for predisposing/predictive molecular biomarker testing. Our data support universal Lynch syndrome screening in all patients with OEC when the diagnosis of other histotypes has been vigorously excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Linda S Cook
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Preventative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency
| | - Anthony N Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | | | - Sandra Lee
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Clinical factors and biomarker profiles associated with patient outcome in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma - Emphasis on tumor grade. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:187-194. [PMID: 34711431 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The role of clinicopathological factors and molecular markers in prognostic classification of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EnOC) is not established. Tumor grade is used in risk assessment, but the role of current 3-tier grading system has been challenged. METHODS Clinicopathological factors and 12 immunohistochemical biomarkers (PR, ER, β-catenin, vimentin, ARID1A, HNF1-β, p53, p16, MIB-1, E-cadherin, c-erb-B2 and L1CAM) were analyzed as regards patient outcome in 215 contemporarily classified EnOCs. RESULTS Of clinical parameters, grade and stage appeared as strong independent prognostic factors both for disease-free and disease-specific overall survival. Grades 1-3 distinguished clearly from each other in the survival analysis, whereas stages I-II and stages III-IV clustered with each other. PR, ER, nuclear β-catenin and vimentin positivity were associated with favorable overall outcome and clinical parameters, whereas abnormal expression of p53, overexpression of p16 and L1CAM positivity were associated with aggressive disease characteristics and poor survival. The frequency of good-prognosis markers PR and β-catenin gradually decreased and poor-prognosis markers p53, p16 and L1CAM gradually increased from grade 1-3. However, vimentin and ER were expressed at similar frequencies across different grades and presented with independent prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS We found histological grade and disease stage, but not residual tumor, to be independent clinical prognostic factors in EnOC. A set of good-prognosis markers (PR, ER, β-catenin and vimentin) and poor-prognosis markers (p53, p16 and L1CAM) were identified. Our findings support continuation of the use of the 3-tier grading system for EnOC and provide clinically feasible IHC biomarkers for prognostic profiling.
Collapse
|
34
|
Witjes VM, van Bommel MHD, Ligtenberg MJL, Vos JR, Mourits MJE, Ausems MGEM, de Hullu JA, Bosse T, Hoogerbrugge N. Probability of detecting germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in histological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. A meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:221-230. [PMID: 34702566 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Histology restricted genetic predisposition testing of ovarian carcinoma patients is a topic of debate as the prevalence of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) in various histological subtypes is ambiguous. Our primary aim was to investigate the proportion of germline BRCA1/2 PVs per histological subtype. Additionally, we evaluated (i) proportion of somatic BRCA1/2 PVs and (ii) proportion of germline PVs in other ovarian carcinoma risk genes. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were systematically searched and we included all studies reporting germline BRCA1/2 PVs per histological subtype. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Subsets of studies were used for secondary analyses. RESULTS Twenty-eight studies were identified. The overall estimated proportion of germline BRCA1/2 PVs was 16.8% (95% CI 14.6 to 19.2). Presence differed substantially among patients with varying histological subtypes of OC; proportions being highest in high-grade serous (22.2%, 95% CI 19.6 to 25.0) and lowest in clear cell (3.0%, 95% CI 1.6 to 5.6) and mucinous (2.5%, 95% CI 0.6 to 9.6) carcinomas. Somatic BRCA1/2 PVs were present with total estimated proportion of 6.0% (95% CI 5.0 to 7.3), based on a smaller subset of studies. Germline PVs in BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, PALB2, and ATM were present in approximately 3%, based on a subset of nine studies. CONCLUSION Germline BRCA1/2 PVs are most frequently identified in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma patients, but are also detected in patients having ovarian carcinomas of other histological subtypes. Limiting genetic predisposition testing to high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma patients will likely be insufficient to identify all patients with a germline PV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera M Witjes
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Majke H D van Bommel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Janet R Vos
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kang EY, Wiebe NJ, Aubrey C, Lee CH, Anglesio MS, Tilley D, Ghatage P, Nelson GS, Lee S, Köbel M. Selection of endometrial carcinomas for p53 immunohistochemistry based on nuclear features. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY CLINICAL RESEARCH 2021; 8:19-32. [PMID: 34596362 PMCID: PMC8682942 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The World Health Organization endorses molecular subclassification of endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (EECs). Our objectives were to test the sensitivity of tumor morphology in capturing p53 abnormal (p53abn) cases and to model the impact of p53abn on changes to ESGO/ESTRO/ESP (European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology) risk stratification. A total of 292 consecutive endometrial carcinoma resections received at Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Canada (2019–2021) were retrieved and assigned to ESGO risk groups with and without p53 status. Three pathologists reviewed the representative H&E‐stained slides, predicted the p53 status, and indicated whether p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC) would be ordered. Population‐based survival for endometrial carcinomas diagnosed during 2008–2016 in Alberta was obtained from the Alberta Cancer Registry. The cohort consisted mostly of grade 1/2 endometrioid carcinomas (EEC1/2; N = 218, 74.6%). One hundred and fifty‐two EEC1/2 (52.1% overall) were stage IA and 147 (50.3%) were low risk by ESGO. The overall prevalence of p53abn and subclonal p53 was 14.5 and 8.3%, respectively. The average sensitivity of predicting p53abn among observers was 83.6%. Observers requested p53 IHC for 39.4% with 98.5% sensitivity to detect p53abn (99.6% negative predictive value). Nuclear features including smudged chromatin, pleomorphism, atypical mitoses, and tumor giant cells accurately predicted p53abn. In 7/292 (2.4%), p53abn upgraded ESGO risk groups (2 to intermediate risk, 5 to high risk). EEC1/2/stage IA patients had an excellent disease‐specific 5‐year survival of 98.5%. Pathologists can select cases for p53 testing with high sensitivity and low risk of false negativity. Molecular characterization of endometrial carcinomas has great potential to refine ESGO risk classification for a small subset but offers little value for approximately half of endometrial carcinomas, namely, EEC1/2/stage IA cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Nicholas Jp Wiebe
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Christa Aubrey
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Derek Tilley
- Cancer Control, Alberta Health Services, Holy Cross Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Sandra Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
D'Alessandris N, Travaglino A, Santoro A, Arciuolo D, Scaglione G, Raffone A, Inzani F, Zannoni GF. TCGA molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: A quantitative systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:427-432. [PMID: 34446267 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) shares morphological and molecular features with endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). Several studies assessed the four TCGA groups of EEC, i.e. POLE-mutated (POLEmut), mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), no specific molecular profile (NSMP) and p53-abnormal (p53abn), in OEC; however, it is unclear whether the TCGA groups have the same distribution and clinicopathological features between OEC and EEC. OBJECTIVE To assess the distribution and clinicopathological features of the TCGA groups in OEC. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out by searching 7 electronic databases from January 2013 to April 2021 for studies assessing the TCGA classification in OEC. Prevalence of each TCGA group in OEC and of FIGO grade 3 and stage>I was pooled using a random-effect model. Prevalence of TCGA groups was compared between OEC and EEC, extracting EEC data from a previous meta-analysis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression survival analyses were performed for progression-free survival (PFS). A significant p-value<0.05 was adopted. RESULTS Four studies with 785 patients were included. The frequency of the TCGA groups in OEC vs EEC was: POLEmut = 5% vs 7.6% (p = 0.594); MMRd = 14.6% vs 29.2% (p < 0.001); p53abn = 14% vs 7.8% (p = 0.097); NSMP = 66.4% vs 55.4% (p = 0.002). The pooled prevalence of FIGO grade 3 was: POLEmut = 19.2%; MMRd = 18.3%; p53abn = 38.1%; NSMP = 14.5%. The pooled prevalence of FIGO stage >I was: POLEmut = 31.6%; MMRd = 42.8%; p53abn = 48.5%; NSMP = 24.6%. Two-, 5- and 10-year PFS was: POLEmut = 100%, 100%, and 100%; MMRd = 89.1%, 82.2% and 73.3%; p53abn = 61.7%, 50.2% and 39.6%; NSMP = 87.7%, 79.6% and 65.5%. The hazard ratio for disease progression (reference = NSMP) was: POLEmut = not estimable (no events); MMRd = 0.825 (p = 0.626); p53abn = 2.786 (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION The prognostic value of the TCGA groups was similar between OEC and EEC, despite the differences in the frequency and pathological features of each group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoletta D'Alessandris
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Antonio Travaglino
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy; Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Angela Santoro
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Damiano Arciuolo
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Giulia Scaglione
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Antonio Raffone
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Frediano Inzani
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Gian Franco Zannoni
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy; Istituto di Anatomia Patologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Virani S, Baiocchi G, Bowtell D, Cabasag CJ, Cho KR, Fortner RT, Fujiwara K, Kim JW, Köbel M, Kurtz JE, Levine DA, Menon U, Norquist BM, Pharoah PDP, Sood AK, Tworoger ST, Wentzensen N, Chanock SJ, Brennan P, Trabert B. Joint IARC/NCI International Cancer Seminar Series Report: expert consensus on future directions for ovarian carcinoma research. Carcinogenesis 2021; 42:785-793. [PMID: 34037709 PMCID: PMC8427725 DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgab043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, ovarian cancer research has evolved considerably because of the emerging recognition that rather than a single disease, ovarian carcinomas comprise several different histotypes that vary by etiologic origin, risk factors, molecular profiles, therapeutic approaches and clinical outcome. Despite significant progress in our understanding of the etiologic heterogeneity of ovarian cancer, as well as important clinical advances, it remains the eighth most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide and the most fatal gynecologic cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer and the United States National Cancer Institute jointly convened an expert panel on ovarian carcinoma to develop consensus research priorities based on evolving scientific discoveries. Expertise ranged from etiology, prevention, early detection, pathology, model systems, molecular characterization and treatment/clinical management. This report summarizes the current state of knowledge and highlights expert consensus on future directions to continue advancing etiologic, epidemiologic and prognostic research on ovarian carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shama Virani
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Genomic Epidemiology Branch, Lyon, France
| | - Glauco Baiocchi
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - David Bowtell
- Women’s Cancer Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Citadel J Cabasag
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Kathleen R Cho
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Keiichi Fujiwara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- Department of Medical and Surgical Oncology and Hematology, Strasbourg Cancer Institute (ICANS-Europe), Strasbourg, France
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Pearlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC CTU at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Barbara M Norquist
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shelley T Tworoger
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paul Brennan
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Genomic Epidemiology Branch, Lyon, France
| | - Britton Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mori S, Gotoh O, Kiyotani K, Low SK. Genomic alterations in gynecological malignancies: histotype-associated driver mutations, molecular subtyping schemes, and tumorigenic mechanisms. J Hum Genet 2021; 66:853-868. [PMID: 34092788 DOI: 10.1038/s10038-021-00940-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
There are numerous histological subtypes (histotypes) of gynecological malignancies, with each histotype considered to largely reflect a feature of the "cell of origin," and to be tightly linked with the clinical behavior and biological phenotype of the tumor. The recent advances in massive parallel sequencing technologies have provided a more complete picture of the range of the genomic alterations that can persist within individual tumors, and have highlighted the types and frequencies of driver-gene mutations and molecular subtypes often associated with these histotypes. Several large-scale genomic cohorts, including the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), have been used to characterize the genomic features of a range of gynecological malignancies, including high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma, uterine cervical carcinoma, and uterine carcinosarcoma. These datasets have also been pivotal in identifying clinically relevant molecular targets and biomarkers, and in the construction of molecular subtyping schemes. In addition, the recent widespread use of clinical sequencing for the more ubiquitous types of gynecological cancer has manifested in a series of large genomic datasets that have allowed the characterization of the genomes, driver mutations, and histotypes of even rare cancer types, with sufficient statistical power. Here, we review the field of gynecological cancer, and seek to describe the genomic features by histotype. We also will demonstrate how these are linked with clinicopathological attributes and highlight the potential tumorigenic mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiichi Mori
- Project for Development of Innovative Research on Cancer Therapeutics, Cancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Osamu Gotoh
- Project for Development of Innovative Research on Cancer Therapeutics, Cancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuma Kiyotani
- Project for Immunogenomics, Cancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Siew Kee Low
- Project for Immunogenomics, Cancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chen S, Li Y, Qian L, Deng S, Liu L, Xiao W, Zhou Y. A Review of the Clinical Characteristics and Novel Molecular Subtypes of Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:668151. [PMID: 34150634 PMCID: PMC8210668 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.668151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the most common gynecologic cancers that has the highest mortality rate. Endometrioid ovarian cancer, a distinct subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, is associated with endometriosis and Lynch syndrome, and is often accompanied by synchronous endometrial carcinoma. In recent years, dysbiosis of the microbiota within the female reproductive tract has been suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer, with some specific pathogens exhibiting oncogenic having been found to contribute to cancer development. It has been shown that dysregulation of the microenvironment and accumulation of mutations are stimulatory factors in the progression of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. This would be a potential therapeutic target in the future. Simultaneously, multiple studies have demonstrated the role of four molecular subtypes of endometrioid ovarian cancer, which are of particular importance in the prediction of prognosis. This literature review aims to compile the potential mechanisms of endometrioid ovarian cancer, molecular characteristics, and molecular pathological types that could potentially play a role in the prediction of prognosis, and the novel therapeutic strategies, providing some guidance for the stratified management of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuangfeng Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yuebo Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Lili Qian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Sisi Deng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Luwen Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Weihua Xiao
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, The CAS Key Laboratory of Innate Immunity and Chronic Disease, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.,Institute of Immunology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Ying Zhou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Integrated molecular characterisation of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma identifies opportunities for stratification. NPJ Precis Oncol 2021; 5:47. [PMID: 34079052 PMCID: PMC8172925 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-021-00187-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EnOC) is an under-investigated ovarian cancer type. Recent studies have described disease subtypes defined by genomics and hormone receptor expression patterns; here, we determine the relationship between these subtyping layers to define the molecular landscape of EnOC with high granularity and identify therapeutic vulnerabilities in high-risk cases. Whole exome sequencing data were integrated with progesterone and oestrogen receptor (PR and ER) expression-defined subtypes in 90 EnOC cases following robust pathological assessment, revealing dominant clinical and molecular features in the resulting integrated subtypes. We demonstrate significant correlation between subtyping approaches: PR-high (PR + /ER + , PR + /ER−) cases were predominantly CTNNB1-mutant (73.2% vs 18.4%, P < 0.001), while PR-low (PR−/ER + , PR−/ER−) cases displayed higher TP53 mutation frequency (38.8% vs 7.3%, P = 0.001), greater genomic complexity (P = 0.007) and more frequent copy number alterations (P = 0.001). PR-high EnOC patients experience favourable disease-specific survival independent of clinicopathological and genomic features (HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.04–0.71). TP53 mutation further delineates the outcome of patients with PR-low tumours (HR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.14–5.75). A simple, routinely applicable, classification algorithm utilising immunohistochemistry for PR and p53 recapitulated these subtypes and their survival profiles. The genomic profile of high-risk EnOC subtypes suggests that inhibitors of the MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways, alongside PARP inhibitors, represent promising candidate agents for improving patient survival. Patients with PR-low TP53-mutant EnOC have the greatest unmet clinical need, while PR-high tumours—which are typically CTNNB1-mutant and TP53 wild-type—experience excellent survival and may represent candidates for trials investigating de-escalation of adjuvant chemotherapy to agents such as endocrine therapy.
Collapse
|
41
|
Evrard C, Alexandre J. Predictive and Prognostic Value of Microsatellite Instability in Gynecologic Cancer (Endometrial and Ovarian). Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2434. [PMID: 34069845 PMCID: PMC8157359 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
For endometrial cancer, a new classification is now available from ESMO, ESGO, and ESTRO based on clinical and molecular characteristics to determine adjuvant therapy. The contribution of molecular biology is major for this pathology mainly by the intermediary of deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability. Detection techniques for this phenotype have many peculiarities in gynecologic cancers (endometrial and ovarian) because it has been initially validated in colorectal cancer only. Endometrial cancer is the most common tumor with deficient mismatch repair, which is an important prognostic factor and a predictor of the benefit of adjuvant treatments. Concerning advanced stages, this phenotype is a theragnostic marker for using immunotherapy. Among ovarian cancer, microsatellite instability is less described in literature but exists, particularly in endometrioid type ovarian cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of the publications concerning deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability in endometrial and ovarian cancers, detection techniques, and clinical implications of these molecular characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Evrard
- Service d’Oncologie Médicale, CHU de Poitiers, 86021 Poitiers, France
| | - Jérôme Alexandre
- Service d’Oncologie Médicale, AP-HP, CARPEM, Cochin-Hospital, Université de Paris, 75014 Paris, France;
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Aubrey C, Saad N, Köbel M, Mattatall F, Nelson G, Glaze S. Implications for management of ovarian cancer in a transgender man: Impact of androgens and androgen receptor status. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:342-346. [PMID: 33663874 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
A 36-year-old transgender man (assigned female at birth) on exogenous testosterone therapy was found to have stage IIA ovarian endometrioid carcinoma, and underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Diffuse androgen receptor expression in the tumor initiated a multidisciplinary discussion regarding the safety of continuing exogenous testosterone as gender-affirming hormone therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa Aubrey
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Nathalie Saad
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Fiona Mattatall
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Sarah Glaze
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Santandrea G, Piana S, Valli R, Zanelli M, Gasparini E, De Leo A, Mandato VD, Palicelli A. Immunohistochemical Biomarkers as a Surrogate of Molecular Analysis in Ovarian Carcinomas: A Review of the Literature. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:199. [PMID: 33572888 PMCID: PMC7911119 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The term "ovarian carcinoma" encompasses at least five different malignant neoplasms: high-grade serous carcinoma, low-grade serous carcinoma, endometrioid carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, and clear cell carcinoma. These five histotypes demonstrated distinctive histological, molecular, and clinical features. The rise of novel target therapies and of a tailored oncological approach has demanded an integrated multidisciplinary approach in the setting of ovarian carcinoma. The need to implement a molecular-based classification in the worldwide diagnostic and therapeutic setting of ovarian cancer demanded a search for easy-to-use and cost-effective molecular-surrogate biomarkers, relying particularly on immunohistochemical analysis. The present review focuses on the role of immunohistochemistry as a surrogate of molecular analysis in the everyday diagnostic approach to ovarian carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Santandrea
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy
- Pathology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.P.); (R.V.); (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Simonetta Piana
- Pathology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.P.); (R.V.); (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Riccardo Valli
- Pathology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.P.); (R.V.); (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Magda Zanelli
- Pathology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.P.); (R.V.); (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Elisa Gasparini
- Oncology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| | - Antonio De Leo
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, AUSL Bologna, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Vincenzo Dario Mandato
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| | - Andrea Palicelli
- Pathology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.P.); (R.V.); (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Casey L, Singh N. POLE, MMR, and MSI Testing in Endometrial Cancer: Proceedings of the ISGyP Companion Society Session at the USCAP 2020 Annual Meeting. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2021; 40:5-16. [PMID: 33290350 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Subclassification of endometrial carcinoma (EC) based on morphologic features alone has been shown to have suboptimal reproducibility, both in regard to biopsy versus hysterectomy findings, as well as interobserver agreement. This restricts the role of morphologic classification of EC as a tool for risk prediction and therefore treatment planning. A diagnostic algorithm based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification of EC holds promise for improving accuracy in risk prediction. This classifies EC into 4 groups: those harbouring mutations in the exonuclease domain of DNA polymerase epsilon, POLE (POLEmut), those showing a mismatch repair defect, those showing mutations in TP53 (p53abn) and a heterogenous group showing none of these 3 abnormalities (currently termed no specific molecular profile). These groups can be accurately and reproducibly diagnosed on biopsy samples using a limited panel of tests, namely immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins and p53, and testing for POLE exonuclease domain pathogenic variants. In this article we briefly review the biology, testing and interpretation of POLE and mismatch repair defects in EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Casey
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
The Many Uses of p53 Immunohistochemistry in Gynecological Pathology: Proceedings of the ISGyP Companion Society Session at the 2020 USCAP Annual9 Meeting. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2020; 40:32-40. [PMID: 33290354 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Ancillary immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become a reliable adjunct for subclassification of gynecological neoplasms. An important recent development was optimization and validation of p53 IHC, where 3 abnormal IHC patterns (nuclear overexpression, complete absence, cytoplasmic) were shown to predict underlying TP53 mutations with high accuracy in ovarian carcinomas. p53 IHC now helps in distinguishing high-grade serous from low-grade serous carcinomas. Thereafter, the new interpretation of p53 IHC was quickly adapted for other purposes and similar accuracies were shown in endometrial carcinomas, vulvar squamous cell carcinomas, and ovarian mucinous tumors. However, it required further refinement of the p53 IHC interpretation criteria for each tumor site. A proportion of endometrial endometrioid carcinomas shows an ultramutated or hypermutated genotype due to underlying POLE mutations or mismatch repair deficiency sometimes causing subclonal TP53 mutations, and their distribution can be visualized by p53 IHC. Squamous cell carcinomas and ovarian mucinous tumors show a phenomenon called terminal differentiation where basal cells demonstrate an abnormal pattern of p53 IHC but apical cells do not despite an underlying TP53 mutation. High-grade progression of adult granulosa cell tumors due to a subclonal TP53 mutation has been recently described. Another use of p53 IHC is triaging gynecological sarcomas for molecular testing based on the assumption that TP53-mutated gynecological sarcomas do not harbor cancer driving translocations. Therefore, familiarity with interpretation of p53 IHC is becoming increasingly important for the practicing gynecological pathologist. Furthermore, local optimization of the p53 IHC assay using validated protocols including appropriate low expressing control tissues (eg, tonsil) is vital in order to achieve high diagnostic accuracy, especially for abnormal staining patterns such as complete absence or cytoplasmic, and interlaboratory concordance. p53 IHC is a reliable diagnostic adjunct for histotyping and molecular subtyping of ovarian and endometrial carcinomas, and it paves the way for large-scale studies to validate the prognostic value of p53 IHC in several gynecological tumor types. The technical advances, validated interpretation criteria, and its growing versatility in identifying high-risk neoplasms paired with its widespread availability in pathology departments make p53 IHC perhaps the single most useful IHC stain in gynecological pathology.
Collapse
|
46
|
Brennan A, Brennan D, Rees M, Hickey M. Management of menopausal symptoms and ovarian function preservation in women with gynecological cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:352-359. [PMID: 33127864 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Gynecological cancers affect a growing number of women globally, with approximately 1.3 million women diagnosed in 2018. Menopausal symptoms are a significant health concern after treatment for gynecological cancers and may result from oncologic treatments such as premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy, ovarian failure associated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and anti-estrogenic effects of maintenance endocrine therapy. Additionally, with the growing availability of testing for pathogenic gene variants such as BRCA1/2 and Lynch syndrome, there is an increasing number of women undergoing risk-reducing oophorectomy, which in most cases will be before age 45 years and will induce surgical menopause. Not all menopausal symptoms require treatment, but patients with cancer may experience more severe symptoms compared with women undergoing natural menopause. Moreover, there is increasing evidence of the long-term implications of early menopause, including bone loss, cognitive decline and increased cardiovascular risk. Systemic hormone therapy is well established as the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms and vaginal (topical) estrogen therapy is effective for genitourinary symptoms. However, the role of hormone receptors in many gynecological cancers and their treatment pose a challenge to the management of menopausal symptoms after cancer. Consequently, the use of menopausal hormone therapy in this setting can be difficult for clinicians to navigate and this article aims to provide current, comprehensive guidance for the use of menopausal hormone replacement therapy in women who have had, or are at risk of developing, gynecological cancer to assist with these treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Donal Brennan
- Gynaecology Oncology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Martha Hickey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
A Modern Approach to Endometrial Carcinoma: Will Molecular Classification Improve Precision Medicine in the Future? Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092577. [PMID: 32927671 PMCID: PMC7564776 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer has been histologically classified as either an estrogen-dependent cancer with a favorable outcome or an estrogen-independent cancer with a worse prognosis. These parameters, along with the clinical attributions, have been the basis for risk stratification. Recent molecular and histopathological findings have suggested a more complex approach to risk stratification. Findings from the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network established four distinctive genomic groups: ultramutated, hypermutated, copy-number low and copy-number high prognostic subtypes. Subsequently, more molecular and histopathologic classifiers were evaluated for their prognostic and predictive value. The impact of molecular classification is evident and will be recognized by the upcoming WHO classification. Further research is needed to give rise to a new era of molecular-based endometrial carcinoma patient care.
Collapse
|