Discrimination of Breast Cancer from Healthy Breast Tissue Using a Three-component Diffusion-weighted MRI Model

Longitudinal registration of T1-weighted breast MRI: A registration algorithm (FLIRE) and clinical application

PURPOSE

MRI is commonly used to aid breast cancer diagnosis and treatment evaluation. For patients with breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy aims to reduce the tumor size and extent of surgery necessary. The current clinical standard to measure breast tumor response on MRI uses the longest tumor diameter. Radiologists also account for other tissue properties including tumor contrast or pharmacokinetics in their assessment. Accurate longitudinal image registration of breast tissue is critical to properly compare response to treatment at different timepoints.

METHODS

In this study, a deformable Fast Longitudinal Image Registration (FLIRE) algorithm was optimized for breast tissue. FLIRE was then compared to the publicly available software packages with high accuracy (DRAMMS) and fast runtime (Elastix). Patients included in the study received longitudinal T1-weighted MRI without fat saturation at two to six timepoints as part of asymptomatic screening (n = 27) or throughout neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (n = 32). T1-weighted images were registered to the first timepoint with each algorithm.

RESULTS

Alignment and runtime performance were compared using two-way repeated measure ANOVAs (P < 0.05). Across all patients, Pearson's correlation coefficient across the entire image volume was slightly higher with statistical significance and had less variance for FLIRE (0.98 ± 0.01 stdev) compared to DRAMMS (0.97 ± 0.03 stdev) and Elastix (0.95 ± 0.03 stdev). Additionally, FLIRE runtime (10.0 mins) was 9.0 times faster than DRAMMS (89.6 mins) and 1.5 times faster than Elastix (14.5 mins) on a Linux workstation.

CONCLUSION

FLIRE demonstrates promise for time-sensitive clinical applications due to its accuracy, robustness across patients and timepoints, and speed.

Discrimination Between Benign and Malignant Lesions With Restriction Spectrum Imaging MRI in an Enriched Breast Cancer Screening Cohort

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer screening with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is recommended for high-risk women but has limitations, including variable specificity and difficulty in distinguishing cancerous (CL) and high-risk benign lesions (HRBL) from average-risk benign lesions (ARBL). Complementary non-invasive imaging techniques would be useful to improve specificity.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of a previously-developed breast-specific diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) model (BS-RSI3C) to improve discrimination between CL, HRBL, and ARBL in an enriched screening population.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

Exactly 187 women, either with mammography screening recommending additional imaging (N = 49) or high-risk individuals undergoing routine breast MRI (N = 138), before the biopsy.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Multishell DW-MRI echo planar imaging sequence with a reduced field of view at 3.0 T.

ASSESSMENT

A total of 72 women had at least one biopsied lesion, with 89 lesions categorized into ARBL, HRBL, CL, and combined CLs and HRBLs (CHRLs). DW-MRI data were processed to produce apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and estimate signal contributions (C1, C2, and C3-restricted, hindered, and free diffusion, respectively) from the BS-RSI3C model. Lesion regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated on DW images based on suspicious DCE-MRI findings by two radiologists; control ROIs were drawn in the contralateral breast.

STATISTICAL TESTS

One-way ANOVA and two-sided t-tests were used to assess differences in signal contributions and ADC values among groups. P-values were adjusted using the Bonferroni method for multiple testing, P = 0.05 was used for the significance level. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and intra-class correlations (ICC) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

C1, √C1C2, andlog C 1 C 2 C 3 $$ \log \left(\frac{{\mathrm{C}}_1{\mathrm{C}}_2}{{\mathrm{C}}_3}\right) $$ were significantly different in HRBLs compared with ARBLs (P-values < 0.05). Thelog C 1 C 2 C 3 $$ \log \left(\frac{{\mathrm{C}}_1{\mathrm{C}}_2}{{\mathrm{C}}_3}\right) $$ had the highest AUC (0.821) in differentiating CHRLs from ARBLs, performing better than ADC (0.696), especially in non-mass enhancement (0.776 vs. 0.517).

DATA CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the BS-RSI3C could differentiate HRBLs from ARBLs in a screening population, and separate CHRLs from ARBLs better than ADC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1

TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE

2.

Quantitative characterization of breast lesions and normal fibroglandular tissue using compartmentalized diffusion-weighted model: comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion and restriction spectrum imaging

BACKGROUND

To compare the compartmentalized diffusion-weighted models, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and restriction spectrum imaging (RSI), in characterizing breast lesions and normal fibroglandular tissue.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 152 patients with 157 histopathologically verified breast lesions (41 benign and 116 malignant). All patients underwent a full-protocol preoperative breast MRI, including a multi-b-value DWI sequence. The diffusion parameters derived from the mono-exponential model (ADC), IVIM model (Dt, Dp, f), and RSI model (C1, C2, C3, C1C2, F1, F2, F3, F1F2) were quantitatively measured and then compared among malignant lesions, benign lesions and normal fibroglandular tissues using Kruskal-Wallis test. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for the pairwise comparisons. Diagnostic models were built by logistic regression analysis. The ROC analysis was performed using five-fold cross-validation and the mean AUC values were calculated and compared to evaluate the discriminative ability of each parameter or model.

RESULTS

Almost all quantitative diffusion parameters showed significant differences in distinguishing malignant breast lesions from both benign lesions (other than C2) and normal fibroglandular tissue (all parameters) (all P < 0.0167). In terms of the comparisons of benign lesions and normal fibroglandular tissues, the parameters derived from IVIM (Dp, f) and RSI (C1, C2, C1C2, F1, F2, F3) showed significant differences (all P < 0.005). When using individual parameters, RSI-derived parameters-F1, C1C2, and C2 values yielded the highest AUCs for the comparisons of malignant vs. benign, malignant vs. normal tissue and benign vs. normal tissue (AUCs = 0.871, 0.982, and 0.863, respectively). Furthermore, the combined diagnostic model (IVIM + RSI) exhibited the highest diagnostic efficacy for the pairwise discriminations (AUCs = 0.893, 0.991, and 0.928, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative parameters derived from the three-compartment RSI model have great promise as imaging indicators for the differential diagnosis of breast lesions compared with the bi-exponential IVIM model. Additionally, the combined model of IVIM and RSI achieves superior diagnostic performance in characterizing breast lesions.

Discrimination between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low-expressing and HER2-overexpressing breast cancers: a comparative study of four MRI diffusion models

OBJECTIVES

To determine the value of conventional DWI, continuous-time random walk (CTRW), fractional order calculus (FROC), and stretched exponential model (SEM) in discriminating human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status of breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

This prospective study included 158 women who underwent DWI, CTRW, FROC, and SEM and were pathologically categorized into the HER2-zero-expressing group (n = 10), HER2-low-expressing group (n = 86), and HER2-overexpressing group (n = 62). Nine diffusion parameters, namely ADC, αCTRW, βCTRW, DCTRW, βFROC, DFROC, μFROC, αSEM, and DDCSEM of the primary tumor, were derived from four diffusion models. These diffusion metrics and clinicopathologic features were compared between groups. Logistic regression was used to determine the optimal diffusion metrics and clinicopathologic variables for classifying the HER2-expressing statuses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate their discriminative ability.

RESULTS

The estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, and tumor size differed between HER2-low-expressing and HER2-overexpressing groups (p < 0.001 to p = 0.009). The αCTRW, DCTRW, βFROC, DFROC, μFROC, αSEM, and DDCSEM were significantly lower in HER2-low-expressing BCs than those in HER2-overexpressing BCs (p < 0.001 to p = 0.01). Further multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the αCTRW was the single best discriminative metric, with an area under the curve (AUC) being higher than that of ADC (0.802 vs. 0.610, p < 0.05); the addition of ER status, PR status, and tumor size to the αCTRW improved the AUC to 0.877.

CONCLUSIONS

The αCTRW could help discriminate the HER2-low-expressing and HER2-overexpressing BCs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low-expressing breast cancer (BC) might also benefit from the HER2-targeted therapy. Prediction of HER2-low-expressing BC or HER2-overexpressing BC is crucial for appropriate management. Advanced continuous-time random walk diffusion MRI offers a solution to this clinical issue.

KEY POINTS

• Human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-low-expressing BC had lower αCTRW, DCTRW, βFROC, DFROC, μFROC, αSEM, and DDCSEM values compared with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. • The αCTRW was the single best diffusion metric (AUC = 0.802) for discrimination between the HER2-low-expressing and HER2-overexpressing breast cancers. • The addition of αCTRW to the clinicopathologic features (estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, and tumor size) further improved the discriminative ability.

Three-compartment spectral diffusion analysis for breast cancer magnetic resonance imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To examine the diagnostic performance of a three-compartment diffusion model with the fixed cut-off diffusion coefficient (D) using magnetic resonance spectral diffusion analysis for differentiating between invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and compare the conventional apparent D (ADC), and mean kurtosis (MK), with the tissue D (DIVIM), perfusion D (D*IVIM), and perfusion fraction (fIVIM) calculated by conventional intravoxel incoherent motion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included women who underwent breast MRI with eight b-value diffusion-weighted imaging between February 2019 and March 2022. Spectral diffusion analysis was performed; very-slow, cellular, and perfusion compartments were defined using cut-off Ds of 0.1 × 10-3 and 3.0 × 10-3 mm2/s (static water D). The mean D (Ds, Dc, Dp, respectively) and fraction F (Fs, Fc, Fp, respectively) for each compartment were calculated. ADC and MK values were also calculated; receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Histologically confirmed 132 ICD and 62 DCIS (age range 31-87 [53 ± 11] years) were evaluated. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for ADC, MK, DIVIM, D*IVIM, fIVIM, Ds, Dc, Dp, Fs, Fc, and Fp were 0.77, 0.72, 0.77, 0.51, 0.67, 0.54, 0.78, 0.51, 0.57, 0.54, and 0.57, respectively. The AUCs for the model combining very-slow and cellular compartments and the model combining the three compartments were 0.81 each, slightly and significantly higher than for ADC, DIVIM, and Dc (P = 0.09-0.14); and MK (P < 0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Three-compartment model analysis using the diffusion spectrum accurately differentiated IDC from DCIS; however, it was not superior to ADC and DIVIM. The diagnostic performance of MK was lower than that of the three-compartment model.

Preoperatively Identify the Microvascular Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with the Restricted Spectrum Imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To noninvasively and preoperatively identify the microvascular invasion (MVI) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with the restricted spectrum imaging (RSI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

62 patients were included into this prospective study and underwent the RSI examination with a 3.0-T scanner. Mono-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and RSI-derived metrics including f1 (fraction of restricted diffusion), f2 (fraction of hindered diffusion), f3 (fraction of free diffusion), and f1f2 (the multiply of f1 and f2) were calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to select the independent risk factors. Nomogram-based model was constructed with the selected indexes. Receiver operative characteristics analysis and calibration curve were used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

MVI-positive HCC showed significantly higher f1 and lower ADC values (ADC: 1.549 ± 0.228 ×10-3 vs 1.365 ± 0.239 ×10-3 mm2/s, P = .003; f1: 0.1633 ± 0.0341 vs 0.2221 ± 0.0491, P < .001). Tumor size and f1 were selected as independent risk factors for MVI. The nomogram-based model was then constructed with tumor size and f1. Nomogram-based model (area under ROC curve [AUC]= 0.856) yielded the best diagnostic accuracy followed by f1 (AUC=0.842) and ADC (AUC=0.708). The AUC of both the f1 and nomogram model were significantly higher than that of ADC.

CONCLUSION

RSI-derived metrics can be utilized to noninvasively and efficiently identify the MVI of HCC. Considering the importance of MVI as a significant prognostic factor for HCC, the utilization of RSI has the potential to assist in prognostic prediction and clinical management.

A Multicompartmental Diffusion Model for Improved Assessment of Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted Imaging Data and Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases

Purpose To develop a multicompartmental signal model for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apply it to study the diffusion properties of normal tissue and metastatic prostate cancer bone lesions in vivo. Materials and Methods This prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03440554) included 139 men with prostate cancer (mean age, 70 years ± 9 [SD]). Multicompartmental models with two to four tissue compartments were fit to DWI data from whole-body scans to determine optimal compartmental diffusion coefficients. Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and model-fitting residuals were calculated to quantify model complexity and goodness of fit. Diffusion coefficients for the optimal model (having lowest BIC) were used to compute compartmental signal-contribution maps. The signal intensity ratio (SIR) of bone lesions to normal-appearing bone was measured on these signal-contribution maps and on conventional DWI scans and compared using paired t tests (α = .05). Two-sample t tests (α = .05) were used to compare compartmental signal fractions between lesions and normal-appearing bone. Results Lowest BIC was observed from the four-compartment model, with optimal compartmental diffusion coefficients of 0, 1.1 × 10^-3, 2.8 × 10^-3, and >3.0 ×10^-2 mm²/sec. Fitting residuals from this model were significantly lower than from conventional apparent diffusion coefficient mapping (P < .001). Bone lesion SIR was significantly higher on signal-contribution maps of model compartments 1 and 2 than on conventional DWI scans (P < .008). The fraction of signal from compartments 2, 3, and 4 was also significantly different between metastatic bone lesions and normal-appearing bone tissue (P ≤ .02). Conclusion The four-compartment model best described whole-body diffusion properties. Compartmental signal contributions from this model can be used to examine prostate cancer bone involvement. Keywords: Whole-Body MRI, Diffusion-weighted Imaging, Restriction Spectrum Imaging, Diffusion Signal Model, Bone Metastases, Prostate Cancer Clinical trial registration no. NCT03440554 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023 See also commentary by Margolis in this issue.

Quantitative Assessment of Restriction Spectrum MR Imaging for the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer and Association With Prognostic Factors

BACKGROUND

Restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) is an advanced quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) technique to assess breast cancer.

PURPOSE

To investigate the ability of RSI to differentiate the benign and malignant breast lesions and the association with prognostic factors of breast cancer.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

Seventy women (mean age, 49.6 ± 12.3 years) with 56 malignant and 19 benign breast lesions.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3-T; RSI-based DWI sequence with echo-planar imaging technique.

ASSESSMENT

The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and RSI parameters (restricted diffusion f₁ , hindered diffusion f₂ , free diffusion f₃ , and signal fractions f₁ f₂ ) were calculated by two readers for the whole lesion volume and compared between the benign and malignant groups and the subgroups with different statuses of prognostic factors in breast cancer.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Mann-Whitney U test or Student's t-test was applied to compare the quantitative parameters between the different groups. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess readers' reproducibility. Binary logistic regression was used to combine parameters. Area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of parameters to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Malignant breast lesions showed significantly lower ADC and f₃ values, and significantly higher f₁ and f₁ f₂ values than the benign lesions, with AUC of 0.951, 0.877, 0.868, and 0.860, respectively. When RSI-derived parameters and ADC were combined, the diagnostic performance was superior to either single parameter (AUC = 0.973). The f₃ value was significantly differed between estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative tumors. The ADC, f₁ , f₃ , and f₁ f₂ values were significantly different progesterone receptor (PR)-positive and PR-negative status.

DATA CONCLUSION

The RSI-derived parameters (f₁ , f₃ , and f₁ f₂ ) may facilitate the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques

The role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) as a biomarker has been the subject of active investigation in the field of breast radiology. By quantifying the random motion of water within a voxel of tissue, DWI provides indirect metrics that reveal cellularity and architectural features. Studies show that data obtained from DWI may provide information related to the characterization, prognosis, and treatment response of breast cancer. The incorporation of DWI in breast imaging demonstrates its potential to serve as a non-invasive tool to help guide diagnosis and treatment. In this review, current technical literature of diffusion-weighted breast imaging will be discussed, in addition to clinical applications, advanced techniques, and emerging use in the field of radiomics.

Tri-Compartmental Restriction Spectrum Imaging Breast Model Distinguishes Malignant Lesions from Benign Lesions and Healthy Tissue on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) offers a potential adjunct to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to discriminate benign from malignant breast lesions by yielding quantitative information about tissue microstructure. Multi-component modeling of the DW-MRI signal over an extended b-value range (up to 3000 s/mm²) theoretically isolates the slowly diffusing (restricted) water component in tissues. Previously, a three-component restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) model demonstrated the ability to distinguish malignant lesions from healthy breast tissue. We further evaluated the utility of this three-component model to differentiate malignant from benign lesions and healthy tissue in 12 patients with known malignancy and synchronous pathology-proven benign lesions. The signal contributions from three distinct diffusion compartments were measured to generate parametric maps corresponding to diffusivity on a voxel-wise basis. The three-component model discriminated malignant from benign and healthy tissue, particularly using the restricted diffusion C₁ compartment and product of the restricted and intermediate diffusion compartments (C₁ and C₂). However, benign lesions and healthy tissue did not significantly differ in diffusion characteristics. Quantitative discrimination of these three tissue types (malignant, benign, and healthy) in non-pre-defined lesions may enhance the clinical utility of DW-MRI in reducing excessive biopsies and aiding in surveillance and surgical evaluation without repeated exposure to gadolinium contrast.

Discriminating rectal cancer grades using restriction spectrum imaging

PURPOSE

Restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) is a novel diffusion MRI model that separates water diffusion into several microscopic compartments. The restricted compartment correlating to the tumor cellularity is expected to be a potential indicator of rectal cancer aggressiveness. Our aim was to assess the ability of RSI model for rectal tumor grading.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with different rectal cancer grading confirmed by biopsy were involved in this study. DWI acquisitions were performed using single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI) with multi-b-values at 3 T. We applied a three-compartment RSI model, along with ADC model and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) model, to DWI images of 58 patients. ROC and AUC were used to compare the performance of the three models in differentiating the low grade (G1 + G2) and high grade (G3). Mean ± standard deviation, ANOVA, ROC analysis, and correlation analysis were used in this study.

RESULTS

The volume fraction of restricted compartment C₁ from RSI was significantly correlated with grades (r = 0.403, P = 0.002). It showed significant difference between G1 and G3 (P = 0.008) and between G2 and G3 (P = 0.01). As for the low-grade and high-grade discrimination, significant difference was found in C₁ (P < 0.001). The AUC of C₁ for differentiation between low-grade and high-grade groups was 0.753 with a sensitivity of 72.0% and a specificity of 70.0%.

CONCLUSION

The three-compartment RSI model was able to discriminate the rectal cancer of low and high grades. The results outperform the traditional ADC model and DKI model in rectal cancer grading.

Clinical experience of tensor-valued diffusion encoding for microstructure imaging by diffusional variance decomposition in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Diffusion-weighted imaging plays a key role in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of breast tumors. However, it remains unclear how to interpret single diffusion encoding with respect to its link with tissue microstructure. The purpose of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to use tensor-valued diffusion encoding to investigate the underlying microstructure of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and evaluate its potential value in a clinical setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed biopsy-proven breast cancer patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI examination from July 2020 to March 2021. We reviewed the MRI of 29 patients with 30 IDCs, including analysis by diffusional variance decomposition enabled by tensor-valued diffusion encoding. The diffusion parameters of mean diffusivity (MD), total mean kurtosis (MKT), anisotropic mean kurtosis (MKA), isotropic mean kurtosis (MKI), macroscopic fractional anisotropy (FA), and microscopic fractional anisotropy (µFA) were estimated. The parameter differences were compared between IDC and normal fibroglandular breast tissue (FGBT), as well as the association between the diffusion parameters and histopathologic items.

RESULTS

The mean value of MD in IDCs was significantly lower than that of normal FGBT (1.07±0.27 vs. 1.34±0.29, P<0.001); however, MKT, MKA, MKI, FA, and µFA were significantly higher (P<0.005). Among all the diffusion parameters, MKI was positively correlated with the tumor size on both MRI and pathological specimen (rs=0.38, P<0.05 vs. rs=0.54, P<0.01), whereas MKT had a positive correlation with the tumor size in the pathological specimen only (rs=0.47, P<0.02). In addition, the lymph node (LN) metastasis group had significantly higher MKT, MKA, and µFA compared to the metastasis negative group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Tensor-valued diffusion encoding enables a useful non-invasive method for characterizing breast cancers with information on tissue microstructures. Particularly, µFA could be a potential imaging biomarker for evaluating breast cancers prior to surgery or chemotherapy.

Characterization of the diffusion signal of breast tissues using multi-exponential models

PURPOSE

Restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) decomposes the diffusion-weighted MRI signal into separate components of known apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs). The number of diffusion components and optimal ADCs for RSI are organ-specific and determined empirically. The purpose of this work was to determine the RSI model for breast tissues.

METHODS

The diffusion-weighted MRI signal was described using a linear combination of multiple exponential components. A set of ADC values was estimated to fit voxels in cancer and control ROIs. Later, the signal contributions of each diffusion component were estimated using these fixed ADC values. Relative-fitting residuals and Bayesian information criterion were assessed. Contrast-to-noise ratio between cancer and fibroglandular tissue in RSI-derived signal contribution maps was compared to DCE imaging.

RESULTS

A total of 74 women with breast cancer were scanned at 3.0 Tesla MRI. The fitting residuals of conventional ADC and Bayesian information criterion suggest that a 3-component model improves the characterization of the diffusion signal over a biexponential model. Estimated ADCs of triexponential model were D_1,3 = 0, D_2,3 = 1.5 × 10^-3 , and D_3,3 = 10.8 × 10^-3 mm² /s. The RSI-derived signal contributions of the slower diffusion components were larger in tumors than in fibroglandular tissues. Further, the contrast-to-noise and specificity at 80% sensitivity of DCE and a subset of RSI-derived maps were equivalent.

CONCLUSION

Breast diffusion-weighted MRI signal was best described using a triexponential model. Tumor conspicuity in breast RSI model is comparable to that of DCE without the use of exogenous contrast. These data may be used as differential features between healthy and malignant breast tissues.

What's Hot in Breast MRI

Several articles in the literature have demonstrated a promising role for breast MRI techniques that are more economic in total exam time than others when used as supplement to mammography for detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. There are many technical factors that must be considered in the shortened breast MRI protocols to cut down time of standard ones, including using optimal fat suppression, gadolinium-chelates intravascular contrast administrations for dynamic imaging with post processing subtractions and maximum intensity projections (MIP) high spatial and temporal resolution among others. Multiparametric breast MRI that includes both gadolinium-dependent, i.e., dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-MRI) and gadolinium-free techniques, i.e., diffusion-weighted/diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DWI/DTI) are shown by several investigators that can provide extremely high sensitivity and specificity for detection of breast cancer. This article provides an overview of the proven indications for breast MRI including breast cancer screening for higher than average risk, determining chemotherapy induced tumor response, detecting residual tumor after incomplete surgical excision, detecting occult cancer in patients presenting with axillary node metastasis, detecting residual tumor after incomplete breast cancer surgical excision, detecting cancer when results of conventional imaging are equivocal, as well patients suspicious of having breast implant rupture. Despite having the highest sensitivity for breast cancer detection, there are pitfalls, however, secondary to false positive and false negative contrast enhancement and contrast-free MRI techniques. Awareness of the strengths and limitations of different approaches to obtain state of the art MR images of the breast will facilitate the work-up of patients with suspicious breast lesions.