1
|
Galldiks N, Lohmann P, Friedrich M, Werner JM, Stetter I, Wollring MM, Ceccon G, Stegmayr C, Krause S, Fink GR, Law I, Langen KJ, Tonn JC. PET imaging of gliomas: Status quo and quo vadis? Neuro Oncol 2024:noae078. [PMID: 38970818 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/08/2024] Open
Abstract
PET imaging, particularly using amino acid tracers, has become a valuable adjunct to anatomical MRI in the clinical management of patients with glioma. Collaborative international efforts have led to the development of clinical and technical guidelines for PET imaging in gliomas. The increasing readiness of statutory health insurance agencies, especially in European countries, to reimburse amino acid PET underscores its growing importance in clinical practice. Integrating artificial intelligence and radiomics in PET imaging of patients with glioma may significantly improve tumor detection, segmentation, and response assessment. Efforts are ongoing to facilitate the clinical translation of these techniques. Considerable progress in computer technology developments (eg quantum computers) may be helpful to accelerate these efforts. Next-generation PET scanners, such as long-axial field-of-view PET/CT scanners, have improved image quality and body coverage and therefore expanded the spectrum of indications for PET imaging in Neuro-Oncology (eg PET imaging of the whole spine). Encouraging results of clinical trials in patients with glioma have prompted the development of PET tracers directing therapeutically relevant targets (eg the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase) for novel anticancer agents in gliomas to improve response assessment. In addition, the success of theranostics for the treatment of extracranial neoplasms such as neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer has currently prompted efforts to translate this approach to patients with glioma. These advancements highlight the evolving role of PET imaging in Neuro-Oncology, offering insights into tumor biology and treatment response, thereby informing personalized patient care. Nevertheless, these innovations warrant further validation in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Michel Friedrich
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Isabelle Stetter
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael M Wollring
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Garry Ceccon
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carina Stegmayr
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Sandra Krause
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Galldiks N, Kaufmann TJ, Vollmuth P, Lohmann P, Smits M, Veronesi MC, Langen KJ, Rudà R, Albert NL, Hattingen E, Law I, Hutterer M, Soffietti R, Vogelbaum MA, Wen PY, Weller M, Tonn JC. Challenges, limitations, and pitfalls of PET and advanced MRI in patients with brain tumors: A report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1181-1194. [PMID: 38466087 PMCID: PMC11226881 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Brain tumor diagnostics have significantly evolved with the use of positron emission tomography (PET) and advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. In addition to anatomical MRI, these modalities may provide valuable information for several clinical applications such as differential diagnosis, delineation of tumor extent, prognostication, differentiation between tumor relapse and treatment-related changes, and the evaluation of response to anticancer therapy. In particular, joint recommendations of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Group, the European Association of Neuro-oncology, and major European and American Nuclear Medicine societies highlighted that the additional clinical value of radiolabeled amino acids compared to anatomical MRI alone is outstanding and that its widespread clinical use should be supported. For advanced MRI and its steadily increasing use in clinical practice, the Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition provided more recently an updated acquisition protocol for the widely used dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI. Besides amino acid PET and perfusion MRI, other PET tracers and advanced MRI techniques (e.g. MR spectroscopy) are of considerable clinical interest and are increasingly integrated into everyday clinical practice. Nevertheless, these modalities have shortcomings which should be considered in clinical routine. This comprehensive review provides an overview of potential challenges, limitations, and pitfalls associated with PET imaging and advanced MRI techniques in patients with gliomas or brain metastases. Despite these issues, PET imaging and advanced MRI techniques continue to play an indispensable role in brain tumor management. Acknowledging and mitigating these challenges through interdisciplinary collaboration, standardized protocols, and continuous innovation will further enhance the utility of these modalities in guiding optimal patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
| | | | - Philipp Vollmuth
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine and Brain Tumour Center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael C Veronesi
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Goethe University, Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Markus Hutterer
- Department of Neurology with Acute Geriatrics, Saint John of God Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tariq R. Predicting response to chemotherapy in brain tumor patients based on MRI features. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2024; 244:108409. [PMID: 38959786 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
Chemotherapy in brain tumors is tailored based on tumor type, grade, and molecular markers, which are crucial for predicting responses and survival outcomes. This review summarizes the role of chemotherapy in gliomas, glioneuronal and neuronal tumors, ependymomas, choroid plexus tumors, medulloblastomas, and meningiomas, discussing standard treatment protocols and recent developments in targeted therapies.Furthermore, the studies reporting the integration of MRI-based radiomics and deep learning models for predicting treatment outcomes are reviewed. Advances in MRI-based radiomics and deep learning models have significantly enhanced the prediction of chemotherapeutic benefits, survival prediction following chemotherapy, and differentiating tumor progression with psuedoprogression. These non-invasive techniques offer valuable insights into tumor characteristics and treatment responses, facilitating personalized therapeutic strategies. Further research is warranted to refine these models and expand their applicability across different brain tumor types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rabeet Tariq
- Department of Neurosurgery, Section of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Issa ASM, Scheins J, Tellmann L, Brambilla CR, Lohmann P, Rota-Kops E, Herzog H, Neuner I, Shah NJ, Lerche C. Impact of improved dead time correction on the quantification accuracy of a dedicated BrainPET scanner. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0296357. [PMID: 38578749 PMCID: PMC10997125 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Quantitative values derived from PET brain images are of high interest for neuroscientific applications. Insufficient DT correction (DTC) can lead to a systematic bias of the output parameters obtained by a detailed analysis of the time activity curves (TACs). The DTC method currently used for the Siemens 3T MR BrainPET insert is global, i.e., differences in DT losses between detector blocks are not considered, leading to inaccurate DTC and, consequently, to inaccurate measurements masked by a bias. However, following careful evaluation with phantom measurements, a new block-pairwise DTC method has demonstrated a higher degree of accuracy compared to the global DTC method. APPROACH Differences between the global and the block-pairwise DTC method were studied in this work by applying several radioactive tracers. We evaluated the impact on [11C]ABP688, O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET), and [15O]H2O TACs. RESULTS For [11C]ABP688, a relevant bias of between -0.0034 and -0.0053 ml/ (cm3 • min) was found in all studied brain regions for the volume of distribution (VT) when using the current global DTC method. For [18F]FET-PET, differences of up to 10% were observed in the tumor-to-brain ratio (TBRmax), these differences depend on the radial distance of the maximum from the PET isocenter. For [15O]H2O, differences between +4% and -7% were observed in the GM region. Average biases of -4.58%, -3.2%, and -1.2% for the regional cerebral blood flow (CBF (K1)), the rate constant k2, and the volume of distribution VT were observed, respectively. Conversely, in the white matter region, average biases of -4.9%, -7.0%, and 3.8% were observed for CBF (K1), k2, and VT, respectively. CONCLUSION The bias introduced by the global DTC method leads to an overestimation in the studied quantitative parameters for all applications compared to the block-pairwise method. SIGNIFICANCE The observed differences between the two DTC methods are particularly relevant for research applications in neuroscientific studies as they affect the accuracy of quantitative Brain PET images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahlam Said Mohamad Issa
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 4, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- JARA, BRAIN, Translational Medicine, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Scheins
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 4, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Lutz Tellmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 4, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | | | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 4, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Elena Rota-Kops
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 4, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Hans Herzog
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 4, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Irene Neuner
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 4, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- JARA, BRAIN, Translational Medicine, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - N. Jon Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 4, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- JARA, BRAIN, Translational Medicine, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 11, INM-11, JARA, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Christoph Lerche
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 4, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hu LS, Smits M, Kaufmann TJ, Knutsson L, Rapalino O, Galldiks N, Sundgrene PC, Cha S. Advanced Imaging in the Diagnosis and Response Assessment of High-Grade Glioma: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024. [PMID: 38477525 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.30612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
This AJR Expert Panel Narrative explores the current status of advanced MRI and PET techniques for the post-therapeutic response assessment of high-grade adult-type gliomas, focusing on ongoing clinical controversies in current practice. Discussed techniques that complement conventional MRI and aid the differentiation of recurrent tumor from post-treatment effects include DWI and diffusion tensor imaging; perfusion MRI techniques including dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and arterial spin labeling; MR spectroscopy including assessment of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) concentration; glucose- and amino acid (AA)-based PET; and amide proton transfer imaging. Updated criteria for Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology are presented. Given the abundant supporting clinical evidence, the panel supports a recommendation that routine response assessment after HGG treatment should include perfusion MRI, particularly given the development of a consensus recommended DSC-MRI protocol. Although published studies support 2HG MRS and AA PET, these techniques' widespread adoption will likely require increased availability (for 2HG MRS) or increased insurance funding in the United States (for AA PET). The article concludes with a series of consensus opinions from the author panel, centered on the clinical integration of the advanced imaging techniques into posttreatment surveillance protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Delta, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Linda Knutsson
- F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Otto Rapalino
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Dept. of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Pia C Sundgrene
- Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund/Radiology, Lund University, Lund Sweden
- Lund BioImaging Center, Lund University, Lud, Sweden
- Department of Medical Imaging and Function Skane University hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Soonmee Cha
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bhattacharya K, Rastogi S, Mahajan A. Post-treatment imaging of gliomas: challenging the existing dogmas. Clin Radiol 2024; 79:e376-e392. [PMID: 38123395 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Gliomas are the commonest malignant central nervous system tumours in adults and imaging is the cornerstone of diagnosis, treatment, and post-treatment follow-up of these patients. With the ever-evolving treatment strategies post-treatment imaging and interpretation in glioma remains challenging, more so with the advent of anti-angiogenic drugs and immunotherapy, which can significantly alter the appearance in this setting, thus making interpretation of routine imaging findings such as contrast enhancement, oedema, and mass effect difficult to interpret. This review details the various methods of management of glioma including the upcoming novel therapies and their impact on imaging findings, with a comprehensive description of the imaging findings in conventional and advanced imaging techniques. A systematic appraisal for the existing and emerging techniques of imaging in these settings and their clinical application including various response assessment guidelines and artificial intelligence based response assessment will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bhattacharya
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - S Rastogi
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - A Mahajan
- Department of imaging, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L7 8YA, UK; University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yu P, Wang Y, Su F, Chen Y. Comparing [18F]FET PET and [18F]FDOPA PET for glioma recurrence diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1346951. [PMID: 38269019 PMCID: PMC10805829 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1346951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of our meta-analysis and systematic review was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic effectiveness of [18F]FET PET and [18F]FDOPA PET in detecting glioma recurrence. Methods Sensitivities and specificities were assessed using the DerSimonian and Laird methodology, and subsequently transformed using the Freeman-Tukey double inverse sine transformation. Confidence intervals were computed employing the Jackson method, while heterogeneity within and between groups was evaluated through the Cochrane Q and I² statistics. If substantial heterogeneity among the studies was observed (P < 0.10 or I² > 50%), we conducted meta-regression and sensitivity analyses. Publication bias was assessed through the test of a funnel plot and the application of Egger's test. For all statistical tests, except for assessing heterogeneity (P < 0.10), statistical significance was determined when the two-tailed P value fell below 0.05. Results Initially, 579 publications were identified, and ultimately, 22 studies, involving 1514 patients(1226 patients for [18F]FET PET and 288 patients for [18F]FDOPA PET), were included in the analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of [18F]FET PET were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.90) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91), respectively, while for [18F]FDOPA PET, the values were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.86-1.00) for sensitivity and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77-0.98) for specificity. A statistically significant difference in sensitivity existed between these two radiotracers (P=0.04), while no significant difference was observed in specificity (P=0.58). Conclusion It seems that [18F]FDOPA PET demonstrates superior sensitivity and similar specificity to [18F] FET PET. Nevertheless, it's crucial to emphasize that [18F]FDOPA PET results were obtained from studies with limited sample sizes. Further larger prospective studies, especially head-to-head comparisons, are needed in this issue. Systematic Review Registration identifier CRD42023463476.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yan Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Albert NL, Galldiks N, Ellingson BM, van den Bent MJ, Chang SM, Cicone F, de Groot J, Koh ES, Law I, Le Rhun E, Mair MJ, Minniti G, Rudà R, Scott AM, Short SC, Smits M, Suchorska B, Tolboom N, Traub-Weidinger T, Tonn JC, Verger A, Weller M, Wen PY, Preusser M. PET-based response assessment criteria for diffuse gliomas (PET RANO 1.0): a report of the RANO group. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e29-e41. [PMID: 38181810 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00525-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) response criteria have been established and were updated in 2023 for MRI-based response evaluation of diffuse gliomas in clinical trials. In addition, PET-based imaging with amino acid tracers is increasingly considered for disease monitoring in both clinical practice and clinical trials. So far, a standardised framework defining timepoints for baseline and follow-up investigations and response evaluation criteria for PET imaging of diffuse gliomas has not been established. Therefore, in this Policy Review, we propose a set of criteria for response assessment based on amino acid PET imaging in clinical trials enrolling participants with diffuse gliomas as defined in the 2021 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. These proposed PET RANO criteria provide a conceptual framework that facilitates the structured implementation of PET imaging into clinical research and, ultimately, clinical routine. To this end, the PET RANO 1.0 criteria are intended to encourage specific investigations of amino acid PET imaging of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Cicone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - John de Groot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maximilian J Mair
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli IS, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin and City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan C Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Brain Tumour Centre, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Medical Delta, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Bogdana Suchorska
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Tatjana Traub-Weidinger
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU Nancy and IADI INSERM UMR 1254, Universitè de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center For Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen Q, Wang K, Ren X, Zhao X, Chen Q, Fan D, Zhang S, Li X, Ai L. Individualized discrimination of tumor progression from treatment-related changes in different types of adult-type diffuse gliomas using [ 11C]methionine PET. J Neurooncol 2023; 165:547-559. [PMID: 38095773 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04529-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the ability of [11C]methionine (MET) PET in distinguishing between tumor progression (TP) and treatment-related changes (TRCs) among different types of adult-type diffuse gliomas according to the 2021 World Health Organization classification and predict overall survival (OS). METHODS We retrospectively selected 113 patients with adult-type diffuse gliomas with suspected TP who underwent MET PET imaging. Maximum and mean tumor-to-background ratios (TBRmax, TBRmean) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were calculated. Diagnoses were verified by histopathology (n = 50) or by clinical/radiological follow-up (n = 63). The diagnostic performance of MET PET parameters was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and area under the curve (AUC) calculation. Survival analysis employed the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS TP and TRCs were diagnosed in 76 (67%) and 37 (33%) patients, respectively. ROC analysis revealed TBRmax had the best performance in differentiating TP from TRCs with a cut-off of 1.96 in IDH-mutant astrocytoma (AUC, 0.87; sensitivity, 93%; specificity 69%), 1.80 in IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma (AUC, 0.96; sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 89%), and 2.13 in IDH wild-type glioblastoma (AUC, 0.89; sensitivity, 89%; specificity, 78%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, higher TBRmean and MTV were significantly correlated with shorter OS in all IDH-mutant gliomas, as well as in IDH-mutant astrocytoma subgroup. CONCLUSION This work confirms that MET PET has varying diagnostic performances in distinguishing TP from TRCs within three types of adult-type diffuse gliomas, and highlights its high diagnostic accuracy in IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma and potential prognostic value for IDH-mutant gliomas, particularly IDH-mutant astrocytoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 119 West Road of South 4th Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 119 West Road of South 4th Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohui Ren
- Department of Neurosurgical Oncology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaobin Zhao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 119 West Road of South 4th Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 119 West Road of South 4th Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, China
| | - Di Fan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 119 West Road of South 4th Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, China
| | - Shu Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 119 West Road of South 4th Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaotong Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 119 West Road of South 4th Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Ai
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 119 West Road of South 4th Ring, Fengtai District, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zeyen T, Paech D, Weller J, Schäfer N, Tzaridis T, Duffy C, Nitsch L, Schneider M, Potthoff AL, Steinbach JP, Hau P, Schlegel U, Seidel C, Krex D, Grauer O, Goldbrunner R, Zeiner PS, Tabatabai G, Galldiks N, Stummer W, Hattingen E, Glas M, Radbruch A, Herrlinger U, Schaub C. Undetected pseudoprogressions in the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial: hints from postprogression survival and MRI analyses. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:607-616. [PMID: 37728779 PMCID: PMC10589172 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04444-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the randomized CeTeG/NOA-09 trial, lomustine/temozolomide (CCNU/TMZ) was superior to TMZ therapy regarding overall survival (OS) in MGMT promotor-methylated glioblastoma. Progression-free survival (PFS) and pseudoprogression rates (about 10%) were similar in both arms. Further evaluating this discrepancy, we analyzed patterns of postprogression survival (PPS) and MRI features at first progression according to modified RANO criteria (mRANO). METHODS We classified the patients of the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial according to long vs. short PPS employing a cut-off of 18 months and compared baseline characteristics and survival times. In patients with available MRIs and confirmed progression, the increase in T1-enhancing, FLAIR hyperintense lesion volume and the change in ADC mean value of contrast-enhancing tumor upon progression were determined. RESULTS Patients with long PPS in the CCNU/TMZ arm had a particularly short PFS (5.6 months). PFS in this subgroup was shorter than in the long PPS subgroup of the TMZ arm (11.1 months, p = 0.01). At mRANO-defined progression, patients of the CCNU/TMZ long PPS subgroup had a significantly higher increase of mean ADC values (p = 0.015) and a tendency to a stronger volumetric increase in T1-enhancement (p = 0.22) as compared to long PPS patients of the TMZ arm. CONCLUSION The combination of survival and MRI analyses identified a subgroup of CCNU/TMZ-treated patients with features that sets them apart from other patients in the trial: short first PFS despite long PPS and significant increase in mean ADC values upon mRANO-defined progression. The observed pattern is compatible with the features commonly observed in pseudoprogression suggesting mRANO-undetected pseudoprogressions in the CCNU/TMZ arm of CeTeG/NOA-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Zeyen
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Daniel Paech
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Johannes Weller
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Niklas Schäfer
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Theophilos Tzaridis
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Cathrina Duffy
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Louisa Nitsch
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Peter Hau
- Department of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander NeuroOncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Uwe Schlegel
- Department of Neurology, Klinik Hirslanden, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Dietmar Krex
- Department of Neurosurgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Oliver Grauer
- Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Roland Goldbrunner
- Center of Neurosurgery Department of General, Neurosurgery University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Pia Susan Zeiner
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, HertieTübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany and Research Center Juelich, Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Juelich, Germany
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Martin Glas
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Medicine Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Medicine Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Schaub
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu P, Huang J, Lu J, Chen Z, Duan W. Postoperative Spinal 18F-FDG PET Pseudoprogression Mimicking Malignancy. Clin Nucl Med 2023; Publish Ahead of Print:00003072-990000000-00596. [PMID: 37276463 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT A 60-year-old woman presented with left upper limb weakness. Spinal MRI revealed C2-C3 heterogeneous mass with no hypermetabolic foci on 18F-FDG PET. Total resection was performed, and the pathology showed gliosis. Her limb weakness worsened 3 months after surgery. Spinal MRI revealed long intramedullary mass from medulla oblongata to C5, which showed obvious hypermetabolism under 18F-FDG PET with an SUVmax of 7.11, but 18F-FET PET indicated mild hypermetabolism with an SUVmax of 2.29. Malignancy was suspected, and C2-C4 biopsy was performed. The pathology results confirmed the diagnosis of gliosis, and the postoperative spinal 18F-FDG PET results were considered pseudoprogression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jing Huang
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Lu
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Galldiks N, Lohmann P, Fink GR, Langen KJ. Amino Acid PET in Neurooncology. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:693-700. [PMID: 37055222 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
For decades, several amino acid PET tracers have been used to optimize diagnostics in patients with brain tumors. In clinical routine, the most important clinical indications for amino acid PET in brain tumor patients are differentiation of neoplasm from nonneoplastic etiologies, delineation of tumor extent for further diagnostic and treatment planning (i.e., diagnostic biopsy, resection, or radiotherapy), differentiation of treatment-related changes such as pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis after radiation or chemoradiation from tumor progression at follow-up, and assessment of response to anticancer therapy, including prediction of patient outcome. This continuing education article addresses the diagnostic value of amino acid PET for patients with either glioblastoma or metastatic brain cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany; and
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany; and
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Soni N, Ora M, Jena A, Rana P, Mangla R, Ellika S, Almast J, Puri S, Meyers SP. Amino Acid Tracer PET MRI in Glioma Management: What a Neuroradiologist Needs to Know. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023; 44:236-246. [PMID: 36657945 PMCID: PMC10187808 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PET with amino acid tracers provides additional insight beyond MR imaging into the biology of gliomas that can be used for initial diagnosis, delineation of tumor margins, planning of surgical and radiation therapy, assessment of residual tumor, and evaluation of posttreatment response. Hybrid PET MR imaging allows the simultaneous acquisition of various PET and MR imaging parameters in a single investigation with reduced scanning time and improved anatomic localization. This review aimed to provide neuroradiologists with a concise overview of the various amino acid tracers and a practical understanding of the clinical applications of amino acid PET MR imaging in glioma management. Future perspectives in newer advances, novel radiotracers, radiomics, and cost-effectiveness are also outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Soni
- From the University of Rochester Medical Center (N.S., S.E., J.A., S.P., S.M.), Rochester, New York
| | - M Ora
- Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (M.O.), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - A Jena
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital (A.J., P.R.), New Delhi, India
| | - P Rana
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital (A.J., P.R.), New Delhi, India
| | - R Mangla
- Upstate University Hospital (R.M.), Syracuse, New York
| | - S Ellika
- From the University of Rochester Medical Center (N.S., S.E., J.A., S.P., S.M.), Rochester, New York
| | - J Almast
- From the University of Rochester Medical Center (N.S., S.E., J.A., S.P., S.M.), Rochester, New York
| | - S Puri
- From the University of Rochester Medical Center (N.S., S.E., J.A., S.P., S.M.), Rochester, New York
| | - S P Meyers
- From the University of Rochester Medical Center (N.S., S.E., J.A., S.P., S.M.), Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Singnurkar A, Poon R, Detsky J. 18F-FET-PET imaging in high-grade gliomas and brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurooncol 2023; 161:1-12. [PMID: 36502457 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04201-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide a summary of the diagnostic performance of 18F-FET-PET in the management of patients with high-grade brain gliomas or metastases from extracranial primary malignancies. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched for studies that reported on diagnostic test parameters in radiotherapy planning, response assessment, and tumour recurrence/treatment-related changes differentiation. Radiomic studies were excluded. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool and the GRADE approach. A bivariate, random-effects model was used to produce summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS Twenty-six studies with a total of 1206 patients/lesions were included in the analysis. For radiotherapy planning of glioma, the pooled proportion of patients from 3 studies with 18F-FET uptake extending beyond the 20 mm margin from the gadolinium enhancement on standard MRI was 39% (95% CI, 10-73%). In 3 studies, 18F-FET-PET was also shown to be predictive of early responders to treatment, whereas MRI failed to show any prognostic value. For the differentiation of glioma recurrence from treatment-related changes, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of TBRmax 1.9-2.3 from 6 studies were 91% (95% CI, 74-97%) and 84% (95% CI, 69-93%), respectively. The respective values for brain metastases from 4 studies were 82% (95% CI, 74-88%) and 82% (95% CI, 74-88%) using TBRmax 2.15-3.11. CONCLUSION While 18F-FET shows promise as a complementary modality to standard-of-care MRI for the management of primary and metastatic brain malignancies, further validation with standardized image interpretation methods in well-designed prospective studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Singnurkar
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Raymond Poon
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Department of Oncology, McMaster University McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,Program in Evidence-Based Care, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, G Wing, 2nd Floor, 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON, L8V 1C3, Canada.
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wollring MM, Werner JM, Ceccon G, Lohmann P, Filss CP, Fink GR, Langen KJ, Galldiks N. Clinical applications and prospects of PET imaging in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas. J Neurooncol 2022; 162:481-488. [PMID: 36577872 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04218-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PET imaging using radiolabeled amino acids in addition to MRI has become a valuable diagnostic tool in the clinical management of patients with brain tumors. This review provides a comprehensive overview of PET studies in glioma patients with a mutation in the isocitrate dehydrogenase gene (IDH). A considerable fraction of these tumors typically show no contrast enhancement on MRI, especially when classified as grade 2 according to the World Health Organization classification of Central Nervous System tumors. Major diagnostic challenges in this situation are differential diagnosis, target definition for diagnostic biopsies, delineation of glioma extent for treatment planning, differentiation of treatment-related changes from tumor progression, and the evaluation of response to alkylating agents. The main focus of this review is the role of amino acid PET in this setting. Furthermore, in light of clinical trials using IDH inhibitors targeting the mutated IDH enzyme for treating patients with IDH-mutant gliomas, we also aim to give an outlook on PET probes specifically targeting the IDH mutation, which appear potentially helpful for response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Wollring
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425, Juelich, Germany.
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Garry Ceccon
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425, Juelich, Germany
| | - Christian P Filss
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chawla S, Bukhari S, Afridi OM, Wang S, Yadav SK, Akbari H, Verma G, Nath K, Haris M, Bagley S, Davatzikos C, Loevner LA, Mohan S. Metabolic and physiologic magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2022; 35:e4719. [PMID: 35233862 PMCID: PMC9203929 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Pseudoprogression (PsP) refers to treatment-related clinico-radiologic changes mimicking true progression (TP) that occurs in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), predominantly within the first 6 months after the completion of surgery and concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) with temozolomide. Accurate differentiation of TP from PsP is essential for making informed decisions on appropriate therapeutic intervention as well as for prognostication of these patients. Conventional neuroimaging findings are often equivocal in distinguishing between TP and PsP and present a considerable diagnostic dilemma to oncologists and radiologists. These challenges have emphasized the need for developing alternative imaging techniques that may aid in the accurate diagnosis of TP and PsP. In this review, we encapsulate the current state of knowledge in the clinical applications of commonly used metabolic and physiologic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques such as diffusion and perfusion imaging and proton spectroscopy in distinguishing TP from PsP. We also showcase the potential of promising imaging techniques, such as amide proton transfer and amino acid-based positron emission tomography, in providing useful information about the treatment response. Additionally, we highlight the role of "radiomics", which is an emerging field of radiology that has the potential to change the way in which advanced MR techniques are utilized in assessing treatment response in GBM patients. Finally, we present our institutional experiences and discuss future perspectives on the role of multiparametric MR imaging in identifying PsP in GBM patients treated with "standard-of-care" CCRT as well as novel/targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjeev Chawla
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sultan Bukhari
- Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine at Rowan University, Voorhees, New Jersey, USA
| | - Omar M. Afridi
- Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine at Rowan University, Voorhees, New Jersey, USA
| | - Sumei Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Santosh K. Yadav
- Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gaurav Verma
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Kavindra Nath
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohammad Haris
- Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | - Stephen Bagley
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laurie A. Loevner
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Withofs N, Kumar R, Alavi A, Hustinx R. Facts and Fictions About [ 18F]FDG versus Other Tracers in Managing Patients with Brain Tumors: It Is Time to Rectify the Ongoing Misconceptions. PET Clin 2022; 17:327-342. [PMID: 35717096 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
MRI is the first-choice imaging technique for brain tumors. Positron emission tomography can be combined together with multiparametric MRI to increase diagnostic confidence. Radiolabeled amino acids have gained wide clinical acceptance. The reported pooled specificity of [18F]FDG positron emission tomography is high and [18F]FDG might still be the first-choice positron emission tomography tracer in cases of World Health Organization grade 3 to 4 gliomas or [18F]FDG-avid tumors, avoiding the use of more expensive and less available radiolabeled amino acids. The present review discusses the additional value of positron emission tomography with a focus on [18F]FDG and radiolabeled amino acids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Withofs
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, Department of Medical Physics, CHU of Liege, Quartier Hopital, Avenue de l'hopital, 1, Liege 1 4000, Belgium; GIGA-CRC in vivo imaging, University of Liege, GIGA CHU - B34 Quartier Hôpital Avenue de l'Hôpital,11, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
| | - Rakesh Kumar
- Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Division, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Abass Alavi
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Roland Hustinx
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, Department of Medical Physics, CHU of Liege, Quartier Hopital, Avenue de l'hopital, 1, Liege 1 4000, Belgium; GIGA-CRC in vivo imaging, University of Liege, GIGA CHU - B34 Quartier Hôpital Avenue de l'Hôpital,11, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Li AY, Iv M. Conventional and Advanced Imaging Techniques in Post-treatment Glioma Imaging. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY 2022; 2:883293. [PMID: 37492665 PMCID: PMC10365131 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2022.883293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Despite decades of advancement in the diagnosis and therapy of gliomas, the most malignant primary brain tumors, the overall survival rate is still dismal, and their post-treatment imaging appearance remains very challenging to interpret. Since the limitations of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the distinction between recurrence and treatment effect have been recognized, a variety of advanced MR and functional imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), MR spectroscopy (MRS), as well as a variety of radiotracers for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) have been investigated for this indication along with voxel-based and more quantitative analytical methods in recent years. Machine learning and radiomics approaches in recent years have shown promise in distinguishing between recurrence and treatment effect as well as improving prognostication in a malignancy with a very short life expectancy. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the conventional and advanced imaging techniques with the potential to differentiate recurrence from treatment effect and includes updates in the state-of-the-art in advanced imaging with a brief overview of emerging experimental techniques. A series of representative cases are provided to illustrate the synthesis of conventional and advanced imaging with the clinical context which informs the radiologic evaluation of gliomas in the post-treatment setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Y. Li
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Michael Iv
- Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Galldiks N, Langen KJ, Albert NL, Law I, Kim MM, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Soffietti R, Wen PY, Weller M, Tonn JC. Investigational PET tracers in neuro-oncology-What's on the horizon? A report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1815-1826. [PMID: 35674736 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Many studies in patients with brain tumors evaluating innovative PET tracers have been published in recent years, and the initial results are promising. Here, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) PET working group provides an overview of the literature on novel investigational PET tracers for brain tumor patients. Furthermore, newer indications of more established PET tracers for the evaluation of glucose metabolism, amino acid transport, hypoxia, cell proliferation, and others are also discussed. Based on the preliminary findings, these novel investigational PET tracers should be further evaluated considering their promising potential. In particular, novel PET probes for imaging of translocator protein and somatostatin receptor overexpression as well as for immune system reactions appear to be of additional clinical value for tumor delineation and therapy monitoring. Progress in developing these radiotracers may contribute to improving brain tumor diagnostics and advancing clinical translational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Javier E Villanueva-Meyer
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joerg C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nardone V, Desideri I, D’Ambrosio L, Morelli I, Visani L, Di Giorgio E, Guida C, Clemente A, Belfiore MP, Cioce F, Spadafora M, Vinciguerra C, Mansi L, Reginelli A, Cappabianca S. Nuclear medicine and radiotherapy in the clinical management of glioblastoma patients. Clin Transl Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-022-00495-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The aim of the narrative review was to analyse the applications of nuclear medicine (NM) techniques such as PET/CT with different tracers in combination with radiotherapy for the clinical management of glioblastoma patients.
Materials and methods
Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used.
Results
This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of NM approaches in combination with radiotherapy in glioma patients.
Conclusions
NM can provide the Radiation Oncologist several aids that can be useful in the clinical management of glioblastoma patients. At the same, these results need to be validated in prospective and multicenter trials.
Collapse
|
21
|
Prather KY, O’Neal CM, Westrup AM, Tullos HJ, Hughes KL, Conner AK, Glenn CA, Battiste JD. A systematic review of amino acid PET in assessing treatment response to temozolomide in glioma. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac008. [PMID: 35300149 PMCID: PMC8923003 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria have been the gold standard for monitoring treatment response in glioblastoma (GBM) and differentiating tumor progression from pseudoprogression. While the RANO criteria have played a key role in detecting early tumor progression, their ability to identify pseudoprogression is limited by post-treatment damage to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which often leads to contrast enhancement on MRI and correlates poorly to tumor status. Amino acid positron emission tomography (AA PET) is a rapidly growing imaging modality in neuro-oncology. While contrast-enhanced MRI relies on leaky vascularity or a compromised BBB for delivery of contrast agents, amino acid tracers can cross the BBB, making AA PET particularly well-suited for monitoring treatment response and diagnosing pseudoprogression. The authors performed a systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase through December 2021 with the search terms “temozolomide” OR “Temodar,” “glioma” OR “glioblastoma,” “PET,” and “amino acid.” There were 19 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies utilized [18F]FET, five utilized [11C]MET, and one utilized both. All studies used static AA PET parameters to evaluate TMZ treatment in glioma patients, with nine using dynamic tracer parameters in addition. Throughout these studies, AA PET demonstrated utility in TMZ treatment monitoring and predicting patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiana Y Prather
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Christen M O’Neal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Alison M Westrup
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Hurtis J Tullos
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Kendall L Hughes
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Andrew K Conner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Chad A Glenn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - James D Battiste
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| |
Collapse
|