1
|
Hu YM, Liu XC, Hu L, Dong ZW, Yao HY, Wang YJ, Zhao WJ, Xiang YK, Liu Y, Wang HB, Yin QK. Inhibition of the ATR-DNAPKcs-RB axis drives G1/S-phase transition and sensitizes triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to DNA holliday junctions. Biochem Pharmacol 2024; 225:116310. [PMID: 38788960 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) is a promising strategy in oncotherapy, as most tumor cells are sensitive to excess damage due to their repair defects. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated and RAD3-related protein (ATR) is a damage response signal transduction sensor, and its therapeutic potential in tumor cells needs to be precisely investigated. Herein, we identified a new axis that could be targeted by ATR inhibitors to decrease the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNAPKcs), downregulate the expression of the retinoblastoma (RB), and drive G1/S-phase transition. Four-way DNA Holliday junctions (FJs) assembled in this process could trigger S-phase arrest and induce lethal chromosome damage in RB-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. Furthermore, these unrepaired junctions also exerted toxic effects to RB-deficient TNBC cells when the homologous recombination repair (HRR) was inhibited. This study proposes a precise strategy for treating TNBC by targeting the DDR and extends our understanding of ATR and HJ in tumor treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue-Miao Hu
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Basic Science Research Center Base (Pharmaceutical Science), Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
| | - Xue-Cun Liu
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Basic Science Research Center Base (Pharmaceutical Science), Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
| | - Lei Hu
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Basic Science Research Center Base (Pharmaceutical Science), Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
| | - Zhi-Wen Dong
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Basic Science Research Center Base (Pharmaceutical Science), Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China; Bohai Rim Advanced Research Institute for Drug Discovery, Yantai, China
| | - Hong-Ying Yao
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Basic Science Research Center Base (Pharmaceutical Science), Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
| | - Ying-Jie Wang
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Basic Science Research Center Base (Pharmaceutical Science), Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
| | - Wen-Jing Zhao
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Basic Science Research Center Base (Pharmaceutical Science), Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
| | - Yu-Ke Xiang
- Guangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology, the NMPA and State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi Liu
- School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
| | - Hong-Bo Wang
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Basic Science Research Center Base (Pharmaceutical Science), Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China.
| | - Qi-Kun Yin
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Basic Science Research Center Base (Pharmaceutical Science), Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Xu C, Jiang Y, Tu Z, Yan J, Guo L, Dong C, Liu J, Yang X, Wang Z, Lu T, Feng J, Chen Y. Advanced Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Highly Selective Wee1 Inhibitors: Enhancing Pharmacokinetics and Antitumor Efficacy. J Med Chem 2024; 67:9927-9949. [PMID: 38847373 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c02434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Wee1 is a kinase that regulates cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. Wee1 inhibition is a potential strategy to suppress the growth of tumors with defective p53 or DNA repair pathways. However, the development of Wee1 inhibitors faces some challenges. AZD1775, the first-in-class Wee1 inhibitor, has poor kinase selectivity and dose-limiting toxicity. Here, we report the discovery of 12h, a highly selective and potent Wee1 inhibitor with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile. 12h showed strong antiproliferative effects against Lovo cells, a colorectal cancer cell line, both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, 12h showed a clean kinase profile and effectively induced cell apoptosis. Our results suggest that 12h is a promising drug candidate for further development as a novel anticancer agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Wang
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211198, P.R. China
| | - Chunyue Xu
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211198, P.R. China
| | - Yiqing Jiang
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211198, P.R. China
| | - Zhenlin Tu
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211198, P.R. China
| | - Jingxue Yan
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211198, P.R. China
| | - Leyi Guo
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211198, P.R. China
| | - Chao Dong
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211198, P.R. China
| | - Jiaqi Liu
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211198, P.R. China
| | - Xiulong Yang
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211198, P.R. China
| | - Ziyi Wang
- Schcool of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211198, P.R. China
| | - Tao Lu
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211198, P.R. China
- State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, 24 Tongjiaxiang, Nanjing 210009, P.R. China
| | - Jie Feng
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211198, P.R. China
| | - Yadong Chen
- School of Sciences, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211198, P.R. China
- State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, 24 Tongjiaxiang, Nanjing 210009, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Patel V, Casimiro S, Abreu C, Barroso T, de Sousa RT, Torres S, Ribeiro LA, Nogueira-Costa G, Pais HL, Pinto C, Costa L, Costa L. DNA damage targeted therapy for advanced breast cancer. EXPLORATION OF TARGETED ANTI-TUMOR THERAPY 2024; 5:678-698. [PMID: 38966174 PMCID: PMC11220312 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy affecting women worldwide, including Portugal. While the majority of BC cases are sporadic, hereditary forms account for 5-10% of cases. The most common inherited mutations associated with BC are germline mutations in the BReast CAncer (BRCA) 1/2 gene (gBRCA1/2). They are found in approximately 5-6% of BC patients and are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, primarily affecting younger women. Pathogenic variants within BRCA1/2 genes elevate the risk of both breast and ovarian cancers and give rise to distinct clinical phenotypes. BRCA proteins play a key role in maintaining genome integrity by facilitating the repair of double-strand breaks through the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. Therefore, any mutation that impairs the function of BRCA proteins can result in the accumulation of DNA damage, genomic instability, and potentially contribute to cancer development and progression. Testing for gBRCA1/2 status is relevant for treatment planning, as it can provide insights into the likely response to therapy involving platinum-based chemotherapy and poly[adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose] polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). The aim of this review was to investigate the impact of HR deficiency in BC, focusing on BRCA mutations and their impact on the modulation of responses to platinum and PARPi therapy, and to share the experience of Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria in the management of metastatic BC patients with DNA damage targeted therapy, including those with the Portuguese c.156_157insAlu BRCA2 founder mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Patel
- Oncology Division, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Sandra Casimiro
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Catarina Abreu
- Oncology Division, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Tiago Barroso
- Oncology Division, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Sofia Torres
- Oncology Division, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Leonor Abreu Ribeiro
- Oncology Division, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Helena Luna Pais
- Oncology Division, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Conceição Pinto
- Oncology Division, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Leila Costa
- Pharmacy Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Luís Costa
- Oncology Division, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Lazzari G, Opattova A, Arena S. Novel frontiers in urogenital cancers: from molecular bases to preclinical models to tailor personalized treatments in ovarian and prostate cancer patients. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2024; 43:146. [PMID: 38750579 PMCID: PMC11094891 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-03065-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the last few decades, the incidence of urogenital cancers has exhibited diverse trends influenced by screening programs and geographical variations. Among women, there has been a consistent or even increased occurrence of endometrial and ovarian cancers; conversely, prostate cancer remains one of the most diagnosed malignancies, with a rise in reported cases, partly due to enhanced and improved screening efforts.Simultaneously, the landscape of cancer therapeutics has undergone a remarkable evolution, encompassing the introduction of targeted therapies and significant advancements in traditional chemotherapy. Modern targeted treatments aim to selectively address the molecular aberrations driving cancer, minimizing adverse effects on normal cells. However, traditional chemotherapy retains its crucial role, offering a broad-spectrum approach that, despite its wider range of side effects, remains indispensable in the treatment of various cancers, often working synergistically with targeted therapies to enhance overall efficacy.For urogenital cancers, especially ovarian and prostate cancers, DNA damage response inhibitors, such as PARP inhibitors, have emerged as promising therapeutic avenues. In BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, PARP inhibitors like olaparib and niraparib have demonstrated efficacy, leading to their approval for specific indications. Similarly, patients with DNA damage response mutations have shown sensitivity to these agents in prostate cancer, heralding a new frontier in disease management. Furthermore, the progression of ovarian and prostate cancer is intricately linked to hormonal regulation. Ovarian cancer development has also been associated with prolonged exposure to estrogen, while testosterone and its metabolite dihydrotestosterone, can fuel the growth of prostate cancer cells. Thus, understanding the interplay between hormones, DNA damage and repair mechanisms can hold promise for exploring novel targeted therapies for ovarian and prostate tumors.In addition, it is of primary importance the use of preclinical models that mirror as close as possible the biological and genetic features of patients' tumors in order to effectively translate novel therapeutic findings "from the bench to the bedside".In summary, the complex landscape of urogenital cancers underscores the need for innovative approaches. Targeted therapy tailored to DNA repair mechanisms and hormone regulation might offer promising avenues for improving the management and outcomes for patients affected by ovarian and prostate cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giada De Lazzari
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Laboratory of Translational Cancer Genetics, Strada Provinciale 142, Km 3.95, Candiolo, TO, ZIP 10060, Italy
| | - Alena Opattova
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Laboratory of Translational Cancer Genetics, Strada Provinciale 142, Km 3.95, Candiolo, TO, ZIP 10060, Italy
| | - Sabrina Arena
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Laboratory of Translational Cancer Genetics, Strada Provinciale 142, Km 3.95, Candiolo, TO, ZIP 10060, Italy.
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Strada Provinciale 142, Km 3.95, Candiolo, TO, ZIP 10060, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nishie R, Tanaka T, Hirosuna K, Miyamoto S, Murakami H, Tsuchihashi H, Toji A, Ueda S, Morita N, Hashida S, Daimon A, Terada S, Maruoka H, Konishi H, Kogata Y, Taniguchi K, Komura K, Ohmichi M. Creation and Validation of Patient-Derived Cancer Model Using Peritoneal and Pleural Effusion in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer: An Early Experience. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2718. [PMID: 38731247 PMCID: PMC11084603 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The application of personalized cancer treatment based on genetic information and surgical samples has begun in the field of cancer medicine. However, a biopsy may be painful for patients with advanced diseases that do not qualify for surgical resection. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are cancer models in which patient samples are transplanted into immunodeficient mice. PDXs are expected to be useful for personalized medicine. The aim of this study was to establish a PDX from body fluid (PDX-BF), such as peritoneal and pleural effusion samples, to provide personalized medicine without surgery. Methods: PDXs-BF were created from patients with ovarian cancer who had positive cytology findings based on peritoneal and pleural effusion samples. PDXs were also prepared from each primary tumor. The pathological findings based on immunohistochemistry were compared between the primary tumor, PDX, and PDX-BF. Further, genomic profiles and gene expression were evaluated using DNA and RNA sequencing to compare primary tumors, PDXs, and PDX-BF. Results: Among the 15 patients, PDX-BF was established for 8 patients (5 high-grade serous carcinoma, 1 carcinosarcoma, 1 low-grade serous carcinoma, and 1 clear cell carcinoma); the success rate was 53%. Histologically, PDXs-BF have features similar to those of primary tumors and PDXs. In particular, PDXs-BF had similar gene mutations and expression patterns to primary tumors and PDXs. Conclusions: PDX-BF reproduced primary tumors in terms of pathological features and genomic profiles, including gene mutation and expression. Thus, PDX-BF may be a potential alternative to surgical resection for patients with advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruri Nishie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
| | - Tomohito Tanaka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
- Center for Medical Research & Development, Division of Translational Research, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (K.T.); (K.K.)
| | - Kensuke Hirosuna
- Department of Regenerative Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8558, Okayama, Japan;
| | - Shunsuke Miyamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
- Center for Medical Research & Development, Division of Translational Research, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (K.T.); (K.K.)
| | - Hikaru Murakami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
| | - Hiromitsu Tsuchihashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
| | - Akihiko Toji
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
| | - Shoko Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
| | - Natsuko Morita
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
| | - Sousuke Hashida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
| | - Atsushi Daimon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
| | - Shinichi Terada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
| | - Hiroshi Maruoka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
| | - Hiromi Konishi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
| | - Yuhei Kogata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
| | - Kohei Taniguchi
- Center for Medical Research & Development, Division of Translational Research, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (K.T.); (K.K.)
| | - Kazumasa Komura
- Center for Medical Research & Development, Division of Translational Research, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (K.T.); (K.K.)
| | - Masahide Ohmichi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (S.M.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (A.D.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (H.K.); (Y.K.); (M.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ngoi NYL, Pilié PG, McGrail DJ, Zimmermann M, Schlacher K, Yap TA. Targeting ATR in patients with cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:278-293. [PMID: 38378898 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-024-00863-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Pharmacological inhibition of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein serine/threonine kinase (ATR; also known as FRAP-related protein (FRP1)) has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment that exploits synthetic lethal interactions with proteins involved in DNA damage repair, overcomes resistance to other therapies and enhances antitumour immunity. Multiple novel, potent ATR inhibitors are being tested in clinical trials using biomarker-directed approaches and involving patients across a broad range of solid cancer types; some of these inhibitors have now entered phase III trials. Further insight into the complex interactions of ATR with other DNA replication stress response pathway components and with the immune system is necessary in order to optimally harness the potential of ATR inhibitors in the clinic and achieve hypomorphic targeting of the various ATR functions. Furthermore, a deeper understanding of the diverse range of predictive biomarkers of response to ATR inhibitors and of the intraclass differences between these agents could help to refine trial design and patient selection strategies. Key challenges that remain in the clinical development of ATR inhibitors include the optimization of their therapeutic index and the development of rational combinations with these agents. In this Review, we detail the molecular mechanisms regulated by ATR and their clinical relevance, and discuss the challenges that must be addressed to extend the benefit of ATR inhibitors to a broad population of patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Y L Ngoi
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Patrick G Pilié
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel J McGrail
- Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Katharina Schlacher
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Timothy A Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Walter B, Hirsch S, Kuhlburger L, Stahl A, Schnabel L, Wisser S, Haeusser LA, Tsiami F, Plöger S, Aghaallaei N, Dick AM, Skokowa J, Schmees C, Templin M, Schenke-Layland K, Tatagiba M, Nahnsen S, Merk DJ, Tabatabai G. Functionally-instructed modifiers of response to ATR inhibition in experimental glioma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2024; 43:77. [PMID: 38475864 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-02995-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The DNA damage response (DDR) is a physiological network preventing malignant transformation, e.g. by halting cell cycle progression upon DNA damage detection and promoting DNA repair. Glioblastoma are incurable primary tumors of the nervous system and DDR dysregulation contributes to acquired treatment resistance. Therefore, DDR targeting is a promising therapeutic anti-glioma strategy. Here, we investigated Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) inhibition (ATRi) and functionally-instructed combination therapies involving ATRi in experimental glioma. METHODS We used acute cytotoxicity to identify treatment efficacy as well as RNAseq and DigiWest protein profiling to characterize ATRi-induced modulations within the molecular network in glioma cells. Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 functional genomic screens and subsequent validation with functionally-instructed compounds and selected shRNA-based silencing were employed to discover and investigate molecular targets modifying response to ATRi in glioma cell lines in vitro, in primary cultures ex vivo and in zebrafish and murine models in vivo. RESULTS ATRi monotherapy displays anti-glioma efficacy in vitro and ex vivo and modulates the molecular network. We discovered molecular targets by genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 loss-of-function and activation screens that enhance therapeutic ATRi effects. We validated selected druggable targets by a customized drug library and functional assays in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. CONCLUSION In conclusion, our study leads to the identification of novel combination therapies involving ATRi that could inform future preclinical studies and early phase clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Walter
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sophie Hirsch
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Laurence Kuhlburger
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Quantitative Biology Center, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Biomedical Data Science, Department of Computer Science, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Aaron Stahl
- NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Tübingen, 72770, Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Leonard Schnabel
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Silas Wisser
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Lara A Haeusser
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Foteini Tsiami
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sarah Plöger
- NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Tübingen, 72770, Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Narges Aghaallaei
- Division of Translational Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Advaita M Dick
- Division of Translational Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Julia Skokowa
- Division of Translational Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christian Schmees
- Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Tübingen, 72770, Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Markus Templin
- NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Tübingen, 72770, Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Katja Schenke-Layland
- Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Tübingen, 72770, Reutlingen, Germany
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department for Medical Technologies and Regenerative Medicine, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marcos Tatagiba
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sven Nahnsen
- Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Quantitative Biology Center, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Biomedical Data Science, Department of Computer Science, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel J Merk
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
- Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
- German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ring A, Kilburn LS, Pearson A, Moretti L, Afshari-Mehr A, Wardley AM, Gurel B, Macpherson IR, Riisnaes R, Baird RD, Martin S, Roylance R, Johnson H, Ferreira A, Winter MC, Dunne K, Copson E, Hickish T, Burcombe R, Randle K, Serra V, Llop-Guevara A, Bliss JM, Turner NC. Olaparib and Ceralasertib (AZD6738) in Patients with Triple-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results from Cohort E of the plasmaMATCH Trial (CRUK/15/010). Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:4751-4759. [PMID: 37773077 PMCID: PMC10690092 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Approximately 10% to 15% of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) have deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and may benefit from PARP inhibitor treatment. PARP inhibitors may also increase exogenous replication stress and thereby increase sensitivity to inhibitors of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) protein. This phase II study examined the activity of the combination of PARP inhibitor, olaparib, and ATR inhibitor, ceralasertib (AZD6738), in patients with advanced TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with TNBC on most recent biopsy who had received 1 or 2 lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease or had relapsed within 12 months of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy were eligible. Treatment was olaparib 300 mg twice a day continuously and celarasertib 160 mg on days 1-7 on a 28-day cycle until disease progression. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Tissue and plasma biomarker analyses were preplanned to identify predictors of response. RESULTS 70 evaluable patients were enrolled. Germline BRCA1/2 mutations were present in 10 (14%) patients and 3 (4%) patients had somatic BRCA mutations. The confirmed ORR was 12/70; 17.1% (95% confidence interval, 10.4-25.5). Responses were observed in patients without germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, including patients with mutations in other homologous recombination repair genes and tumors with functional homologous recombination deficiency by RAD51 foci. CONCLUSIONS The response rate to olaparib and ceralasertib did not meet prespecified criteria for activity in the overall evaluable population, but responses were observed in patients who would not be expected to respond to olaparib monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alistair Ring
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy S. Kilburn
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Pearson
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Moretti
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Angelica Afshari-Mehr
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Bora Gurel
- Clinical Studies – Cancer Biomarkers, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Iain R. Macpherson
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Riisnaes
- Clinical Studies – Cancer Biomarkers, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sue Martin
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Roylance
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Johnson
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ana Ferreira
- Clinical Studies – Cancer Biomarkers, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew C. Winter
- Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Kathryn Dunne
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ellen Copson
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Tamas Hickish
- Royal Bournemouth Hospital, University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, United Kingdom
| | - Russell Burcombe
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, Kent, United Kingdom
| | - Kat Randle
- Independent Cancer Patients’ Voice, London, United Kingdom
| | - Violeta Serra
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alba Llop-Guevara
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Judith M. Bliss
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicolas C. Turner
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saner FAM, Takahashi K, Budden T, Pandey A, Ariyaratne D, Zwimpfer TA, Meagher NS, Fereday S, Twomey L, Pishas KI, Hoang T, Bolithon A, Traficante N, Alsop K, Christie EL, Kang EY, Nelson GS, Ghatage P, Lee CH, Riggan MJ, Alsop J, Beckmann MW, Boros J, Brand AH, Brooks-Wilson A, Carney ME, Coulson P, Courtney-Brooks M, Cushing-Haugen KL, Cybulski C, El-Bahrawy MA, Elishaev E, Erber R, Gayther SA, Gentry-Maharaj A, Blake Gilks C, Harnett PR, Harris HR, Hartmann A, Hein A, Hendley J, Hernandez BY, Jakubowska A, Jimenez-Linan M, Jones ME, Kaufmann SH, Kennedy CJ, Kluz T, Koziak JM, Kristjansdottir B, Le ND, Lener M, Lester J, Lubiński J, Mateoiu C, Orsulic S, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Shah M, Sharma R, Sherman ME, Shvetsov YB, Singh N, Rinda Soong T, Steed H, Sukumvanich P, Talhouk A, Taylor SE, Vierkant RA, Wang C, Widschwendter M, Wilkens LR, Winham SJ, Anglesio MS, Berchuck A, Brenton JD, Campbell I, Cook LS, Doherty JA, Fasching PA, Fortner RT, Goodman MT, Gronwald J, Huntsman DG, Karlan BY, Kelemen LE, Menon U, Modugno F, Pharoah PD, Schildkraut JM, Sundfeldt K, Swerdlow AJ, Goode EL, DeFazio A, Köbel M, Ramus SJ, Bowtell DDL, Garsed DW. Concurrent RB1 loss and BRCA-deficiency predicts enhanced immunological response and long-term survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.11.09.23298321. [PMID: 37986741 PMCID: PMC10659507 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.09.23298321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Somatic loss of the tumour suppressor RB1 is a common event in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), which frequently co-occurs with alterations in homologous recombination DNA repair genes including BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA). We examined whether tumour expression of RB1 was associated with survival across ovarian cancer histotypes (HGSC, endometrioid (ENOC), clear cell (CCOC), mucinous (MOC), low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC)), and how co-occurrence of germline BRCA pathogenic variants and RB1 loss influences long-term survival in a large series of HGSC. Patients and methods RB1 protein expression patterns were classified by immunohistochemistry in epithelial ovarian carcinomas of 7436 patients from 20 studies participating in the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium and assessed for associations with overall survival (OS), accounting for patient age at diagnosis and FIGO stage. We examined RB1 expression and germline BRCA status in a subset of 1134 HGSC, and related genotype to survival, tumour infiltrating CD8+ lymphocyte counts and transcriptomic subtypes. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we deleted RB1 in HGSC cell lines with and without BRCA1 mutations to model co-loss with treatment response. We also performed genomic analyses on 126 primary HGSC to explore the molecular characteristics of concurrent homologous recombination deficiency and RB1 loss. Results RB1 protein loss was most frequent in HGSC (16.4%) and was highly correlated with RB1 mRNA expression. RB1 loss was associated with longer OS in HGSC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.83, P = 6.8 ×10-7), but with poorer prognosis in ENOC (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.17-4.03, P = 0.0140). Germline BRCA mutations and RB1 loss co-occurred in HGSC (P < 0.0001). Patients with both RB1 loss and germline BRCA mutations had a superior OS (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25-0.58, P = 5.2 ×10-6) compared to patients with either alteration alone, and their median OS was three times longer than non-carriers whose tumours retained RB1 expression (9.3 years vs. 3.1 years). Enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin (P < 0.01) and paclitaxel (P < 0.05) was seen in BRCA1 mutated cell lines with RB1 knockout. Among 126 patients with whole-genome and transcriptome sequence data, combined RB1 loss and genomic evidence of homologous recombination deficiency was correlated with transcriptional markers of enhanced interferon response, cell cycle deregulation, and reduced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in primary HGSC. CD8+ lymphocytes were most prevalent in BRCA-deficient HGSC with co-loss of RB1. Conclusions Co-occurrence of RB1 loss and BRCA mutation was associated with exceptionally long survival in patients with HGSC, potentially due to better treatment response and immune stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flurina A. M. Saner
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kazuaki Takahashi
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Timothy Budden
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Skin Cancer and Ageing Lab, Cancer Research United Kingdom Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ahwan Pandey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Nicola S. Meagher
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laura Twomey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kathleen I. Pishas
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Therese Hoang
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adelyn Bolithon
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kathryn Alsop
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth L. Christie
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eun-Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Gregg S. Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Marjorie J. Riggan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jessica Boros
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alison H. Brand
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Michael E. Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Madeleine Courtney-Brooks
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kara L. Cushing-Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Mona A. El-Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Simon A. Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Women’s Cancer, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - C. Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Paul R. Harnett
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Holly R. Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - AOCS Group
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Michael E. Jones
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Scott H. Kaufmann
- Division of Oncology Research, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Catherine J. Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecology Oncology and Obstetrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszów, Poland
| | | | - Björg Kristjansdottir
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nhu D. Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Marcin Lener
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Sandra Orsulic
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Minouk J. Schoemaker
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark E. Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - T. Rinda Soong
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, North Zone, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Paniti Sukumvanich
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aline Talhouk
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sarah E. Taylor
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Robert A. Vierkant
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Stacey J. Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - James D. Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Linda S. Cook
- Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer A. Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Renée T. Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marc T. Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - David G. Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Beth Y. Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Linda E. Kelemen
- Division of Acute Disease Epidemiology, South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Women’s Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, USA
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joellen M. Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anthony J. Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David D. L. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dale W. Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ao W, Kim HI, Tommarello D, Conrads KA, Hood BL, Litzi T, Abulez T, Teng PN, Dalgard CL, Zhang X, Wilkerson MD, Darcy KM, Tarney CM, Phippen NT, Bakkenist CJ, Maxwell GL, Conrads TP, Risinger JI, Bateman NW. Metronomic dosing of ovarian cancer cells with the ATR inhibitor AZD6738 leads to loss of CDC25A expression and resistance to ATRi treatment. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 177:60-71. [PMID: 37639904 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE ATR kinase inhibitors promote cell killing by inducing replication stress and through potentiation of genotoxic agents in gynecologic cancer cells. To explore mechanisms of acquired resistance to ATRi in ovarian cancer, we characterized ATRi-resistant ovarian cancer cells generated by metronomic dosing with the clinical ATR inhibitor AZD6738. METHODS ATRi-resistant ovarian cancer cells (OVCAR3 and OV90) were generated by dosing with AZD6738 and assessed for sensitivity to Chk1i (LY2603618), PARPi (Olaparib) and combination with cisplatin or a CDK4/6 inhibitor (Palbociclib). Models were characterized by diverse methods including silencing CDC25A in OV90 cells and assessing impact on ATRi response. Serum proteomic analysis of ATRi-resistant OV90 xenografts was performed to identify circulating biomarker candidates of ATRi-resistance. RESULTS AZD6738-resistant cell lines are refractory to LY2603618, but not to Olaparib or combinations with cisplatin. Cell cycle analyses showed ATRi-resistant cells exhibit G1/S arrest following AZD6738 treatment. Accordingly, combination with Palbociclib confers resistance to AZD6738. AZD6738-resistant cells exhibit altered abundances of G1/S phase regulatory proteins, including loss of CDC25A in AZD6738-resistant OV90 cells. Silencing of CDC25A in OV90 cells confers resistance to AZD6738. Serum proteomics from AZD6738-resistant OV90 xenografts identified Vitamin D-Binding Protein (GC), Apolipoprotein E (APOE) and A1 (APOA1) as significantly elevated in AZD6738-resistant backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS We show that metronomic dosing of ovarian cancer cells with AZD6738 results in resistance to ATR/ Chk1 inhibitors, that loss of CDC25A expression represents a mechanism of resistance to ATRi treatment in ovarian cancer cells and identify several circulating biomarker candidates of CDC25A low, AZD6738-resistant ovarian cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Ao
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Hong Im Kim
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Domenic Tommarello
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Kelly A Conrads
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Brian L Hood
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Tracy Litzi
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Tamara Abulez
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Pang-Ning Teng
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Clifton L Dalgard
- The American Genome Center, Department of Anatomy Physiology and Genetics, Collaborative Health Initiative Research Program, Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Xijun Zhang
- The American Genome Center, Department of Anatomy Physiology and Genetics, Collaborative Health Initiative Research Program, Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Matthew D Wilkerson
- The American Genome Center, Department of Anatomy Physiology and Genetics, Collaborative Health Initiative Research Program, Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Kathleen M Darcy
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. Bethesda, MD 20817, USA; The John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA
| | - Christopher M Tarney
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; The John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA
| | - Neil T Phippen
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; The John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA
| | - Christopher J Bakkenist
- Departments of Radiation Biology and Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
| | - G Larry Maxwell
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; The John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, 3300 Gallows Rd. Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
| | - Thomas P Conrads
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; The John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, 3300 Gallows Rd. Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
| | - John I Risinger
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Nicholas W Bateman
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. Bethesda, MD 20817, USA; The John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda 20889, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Akinjiyan FA, Morecroft R, Phillipps J, Adeyelu T, Elliott A, Park SJ, Butt OH, Zhou AY, Ansstas G. Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) in Cutaneous Oncology. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10771. [PMID: 37445949 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Skin cancers, including basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and melanoma, are the most common malignancies in the United States. Loss of DNA repair pathways in the skin plays a significant role in tumorigenesis. In recent years, targeting DNA repair pathways, particularly homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), has emerged as a potential therapeutic approach in cutaneous malignancies. This review provides an overview of DNA damage and repair pathways, with a focus on HRD, and discusses major advances in targeting these pathways in skin cancers. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been developed to exploit HRD in cancer cells. PARP inhibitors disrupt DNA repair mechanisms by inhibiting PARP enzymatic activity, leading to the accumulation of DNA damage and cell death. The concept of synthetic lethality has been demonstrated in HR-deficient cells, such as those with BRCA1/2 mutations, which exhibit increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. HRD assessment methods, including genomic scars, RAD51 foci formation, functional assays, and BRCA1/2 mutation analysis, are discussed as tools for identifying patients who may benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy. Furthermore, HRD has been implicated in the response to immunotherapy, and the combination of PARP inhibitors with immunotherapy has shown promising results. The frequency of HRD in melanoma ranges from 18% to 57%, and studies investigating the use of PARP inhibitors as monotherapy in melanoma are limited. Further research is warranted to explore the potential of PARP inhibition in melanoma treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Favour A Akinjiyan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Renee Morecroft
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Jordan Phillipps
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | | | | | - Soo J Park
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Omar H Butt
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Alice Y Zhou
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - George Ansstas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alli VJ, Yadav P, Suresh V, Jadav SS. Synthetic and Medicinal Chemistry Approaches Toward WEE1 Kinase Inhibitors and Its Degraders. ACS OMEGA 2023; 8:20196-20233. [PMID: 37323408 PMCID: PMC10268025 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c01558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
WEE1 is a checkpoint kinase critical for mitotic events, especially in cell maturation and DNA repair. Most cancer cells' progression and survival are linked with elevated levels of WEE1 kinase. Thus, WEE1 kinase has become a new promising druggable target. A few classes of WEE1 inhibitors are designed by rationale or structure-based techniques and optimization approaches to identify selective acting anticancer agents. The discovery of the WEE1 inhibitor AZD1775 further emphasized WEE1 as a promising anticancer target. Therefore, the current review provides a comprehensive data on medicinal chemistry, synthetic approaches, optimization methods, and the interaction profile of WEE1 kinase inhibitors. In addition, WEE1 PROTAC degraders and their synthetic procedures, including a list of noncoding RNAs necessary for regulation of WEE1, are also highlighted. From the standpoint of medicinal chemistry, the contents of this compilation serve as an exemplar for the further design, synthesis, and optimization of promising WEE1-targeted anticancer agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vidya Jyothi Alli
- Department
of Natural Products and Medicinal Chemistry, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology Tarnaka, Uppal Road, Hyderabad 500037, India
| | - Pawan Yadav
- Department
of Natural Products and Medicinal Chemistry, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology Tarnaka, Uppal Road, Hyderabad 500037, India
| | - Vavilapalli Suresh
- Department
of Organic Synthesis and Process Chemistry, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology Tarnaka, Uppal Road, Hyderabad 500037, India
- Academy
of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India
| | - Surender Singh Jadav
- Department
of Natural Products and Medicinal Chemistry, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology Tarnaka, Uppal Road, Hyderabad 500037, India
- Academy
of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhen DB, Safyan RA, Konick EQ, Nguyen R, Prichard CC, Chiorean EG. The role of molecular testing in pancreatic cancer. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231171456. [PMID: 37197396 PMCID: PMC10184226 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231171456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is highly aggressive and has few treatment options. To personalize therapy, it is critical to delineate molecular subtypes and understand inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity. Germline testing for hereditary genetic abnormalities is recommended for all patients with PDA and somatic molecular testing is recommended for all patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. KRAS mutations are present in 90% of PDA, while 10% are KRAS wild type and are potentially targetable with epidermal growth factor receptor blockade. KRASG12C inhibitors have shown activity in G12C-mutated cancers, and novel G12D and pan-RAS inhibitors are in clinical trials. DNA damage repair abnormalities, germline or somatic, occur in 5-10% of patients and are likely to benefit from DNA damaging agents and maintenance therapy with poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors. Fewer than 1% of PDA harbor microsatellite instability high status and are susceptible to immune checkpoint blockade. Albeit very rare, occurring in <1% of patients with KRAS wild-type PDAs, BRAF V600E mutations, RET and NTRK fusions are targetable with cancer agnostic Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies. Genetic, epigenetic, and tumor microenvironment targets continue to be identified at an unprecedented pace, enabling PDA patients to be matched to targeted and immune therapeutics, including antibody-drug conjugates, and genetically engineered chimeric antigen receptor or T-cell receptor - T-cell therapies. In this review, we highlight clinically relevant molecular alterations and focus on targeted strategies that can improve patient outcomes through precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B. Zhen
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rachael A. Safyan
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Eric Q. Konick
- University of Washington, School of Medicine Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ryan Nguyen
- University of Washington, School of Medicine Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - E. Gabriela Chiorean
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 825 Eastlake Avenue East, LG-465, Seattle, WA 98109, USA Fred Hutchinson
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yang S, Green A, Brown N, Robinson A, Senat M, Testino B, Dinulescu DM, Sridhar S. Sustained delivery of PARP inhibitor Talazoparib for the treatment of BRCA-deficient ovarian cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1175617. [PMID: 37228496 PMCID: PMC10203577 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1175617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Ovarian cancer has long been known to be the deadliest cancer associated with the female reproductive system. More than 15% of ovarian cancer patients have a defective BRCA-mediated homologous recombination repair pathway that can be therapeutically targeted with PARP inhibitors (PARPi), such as Talazoparib (TLZ). The expansion of TLZ clinical approval beyond breast cancer has been hindered due to the highly potent systemic side effects resembling chemotherapeutics. Here we report the development of a novel TLZ-loaded PLGA implant (InCeT-TLZ) that sustainedly releases TLZ directly into the peritoneal (i.p.) cavity to treat patient-mimicking BRCA-mutated metastatic ovarian cancer (mOC). Methods InCeT-TLZ was fabricated by dissolving TLZ and PLGA in chloroform, followed by extrusion and evaporation. Drug loading and release were confirmed by HPLC. The in vivo therapeutic efficacy of InCeT-TLZ was carried out in a murine Brca2-/-p53R172H/-Pten-/- genetically engineered peritoneally mOC model. Mice with tumors were divided into four groups: PBS i.p. injection, empty implant i.p. implantation, TLZ i.p. injection, and InCeT-TLZ i.p. implantation. Body weight was recorded three times weekly as an indicator of treatment tolerance and efficacy. Mice were sacrificed when the body weight increased by 50% of the initial weight. Results Biodegradable InCeT-TLZ administered intraperitoneally releases 66 μg of TLZ over 25 days. In vivo experimentation shows doubled survival in the InCeT-TLZ treated group compared to control, and no significant signs of toxicity were visible histologically in the surrounding peritoneal organs, indicating that the sustained and local delivery of TLZ greatly maximized therapeutic efficacy and minimized severe clinical side effects. The treated animals eventually developed resistance to PARPi therapy and were sacrificed. To explore treatments to overcome resistance, in vitro studies with TLZ sensitive and resistant ascites-derived murine cell lines were carried out and demonstrated that ATR inhibitor and PI3K inhibitor could be used in combination with the InCeT-TLZ to overcome acquired PARPi resistance. Conclusion Compared to intraperitoneal PARPi injection, the InCeT-TLZ better inhibits tumor growth, delays the ascites formation, and prolongs the overall survival of treated mice, which could be a promising therapy option that benefits thousands of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shicheng Yang
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Allen Green
- Department of Pathology, Division of Women’s and Perinatal Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Needa Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Cancer Nanomedicine Co-ops for Undergraduate Research Experience (CaNCURE), Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alexis Robinson
- Cancer Nanomedicine Co-ops for Undergraduate Research Experience (CaNCURE), Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Merline Senat
- Cancer Nanomedicine Co-ops for Undergraduate Research Experience (CaNCURE), Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Bryanna Testino
- Department of Pathology, Division of Women’s and Perinatal Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Cancer Nanomedicine Co-ops for Undergraduate Research Experience (CaNCURE), Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Daniela M. Dinulescu
- Department of Pathology, Division of Women’s and Perinatal Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Srinivas Sridhar
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Cancer Nanomedicine Co-ops for Undergraduate Research Experience (CaNCURE), Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The Landscape and Therapeutic Targeting of BRCA1, BRCA2 and Other DNA Damage Response Genes in Pancreatic Cancer. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2023; 45:2105-2120. [PMID: 36975505 PMCID: PMC10047276 DOI: 10.3390/cimb45030135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Genes participating in the cellular response to damaged DNA have an important function to protect genetic information from alterations due to extrinsic and intrinsic cellular insults. In cancer cells, alterations in these genes are a source of genetic instability, which is advantageous for cancer progression by providing background for adaptation to adverse environments and attack by the immune system. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been known for decades to predispose to familial breast and ovarian cancers, and, more recently, prostate and pancreatic cancers have been added to the constellation of cancers that show increased prevalence in these families. Cancers associated with these genetic syndromes are currently treated with PARP inhibitors based on the exquisite sensitivity of cells lacking BRCA1 or BRCA2 function to inhibition of the PARP enzyme. In contrast, the sensitivity of pancreatic cancers with somatic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and with mutations in other homologous recombination (HR) repair genes to PARP inhibitors is less established and the subject of ongoing investigations. This paper reviews the prevalence of pancreatic cancers with HR gene defects and treatment of pancreatic cancer patients with defects in HR with PARP inhibitors and other drugs in development that target these molecular defects.
Collapse
|
16
|
Bo W, Chen Y. Lenvatinib resistance mechanism and potential ways to conquer. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1153991. [PMID: 37153782 PMCID: PMC10157404 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1153991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Lenvatinib (LVN) has been appoved to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma, differentiated thyroid carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma. Further other cancer types also have been tried in pre-clinic and clinic without approvation by FDA. The extensive use of lenvastinib in clinical practice is sufficient to illustrate its important therapeutic role. Although the drug resistance has not arised largely in clinical, the studies focusing on the resistance of LVN increasingly. In order to keep up with the latest progress of resistance caused by LVN, we summerized the latest studies from identify published reports. In this review, we found the latest report about resistance caused by lenvatinib, which were contained the hotspot mechanism such as the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, ferroptosis, RNA modification and so on. The potential ways to conquer the resistance of LVN were embraced by nanotechnology, CRISPR technology and traditional combined strategy. The latest literature review of LVN caused resistance would bring some ways for further study of LVN. We call for more attention to the pharmacological parameters of LVN in clinic, which was rarely and would supply key elements for drug itself in human beings and help to find the resistance target or idea for further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wentao Bo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- *Correspondence: Yan Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
O'Connor MJ, Forment JV. Mechanisms of PARP Inhibitor Resistance. Cancer Treat Res 2023; 186:25-42. [PMID: 37978129 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-30065-3_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) represent the first medicines based on the targeting of the DNA damage response (DDR). PARPi have become standard of care for first-line maintenance treatment in ovarian cancer and have also been approved in other cancer indications including breast, pancreatic and prostate. Despite their efficacy, resistance to PARPi has been reported clinically and represents a growing patient population with unmet clinical need. Here, we describe the various mechanisms of PARPi resistance that have been identified in pre-clinical models and in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J O'Connor
- Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Discovery Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, 1 Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, UK.
| | - Josep V Forment
- Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Discovery Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, 1 Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
BRCA1/2 Reversion Mutations in Patients Treated with Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitors or Platinum Agents. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58121818. [PMID: 36557020 PMCID: PMC9785940 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58121818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Reversion mutations in BRCA1/2, resulting in restoration of the open reading frame, have been identified as a mechanism of resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy or PARP inhibition. We sought to explore the incidence of BRCA1/2 reversion mutations in different tumor types. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed molecular profiling results from primary and/or metastatic tumor samples submitted by multiple institutions. The samples underwent DNA and RNA sequencing at a CLIA/CAP-certified clinical lab. Reversion mutations were called only in patients whose available clinical records showed the use of PARP inhibitors or platinum agents prior to tumor profiling. Results: Reversion mutations were identified in 75 of 247,926 samples profiled across all tumor types. Among patients carrying pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, reversion mutations in BRCA1/2 genes were seen in ovarian cancer (OC) (30/3424), breast cancer (BC) (27/1460), endometrial cancer (4/564), pancreatic cancer (2/340), cholangiocarcinoma (2/178), prostate cancer (5/461), cervical cancer (1/117), cancer of unknown primary (1/244), bladder cancer (1/300), malignant pleural mesothelioma (1/10), and a neuroendocrine tumor of the prostate. We identified 22 reversion mutations in BRCA1 and 8 in BRCA2 in OC. In BC, we detected 6 reversion mutations in BRCA1 and 21 in BRCA2. We compared molecular profile results of 14 high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) with reversion mutations against 87 control HGSOC with pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations without reversion mutations. Tumors with reversion mutations trended to have had lower ER expression (25% vs. 64%, p = 0.024, q = 0.82) and higher KDM6A mutation rate (15% vs. 0, p = 0.016, q = 0.82). Conclusions: We present one of the largest datasets reporting reversion mutations in BRCA1/2 genes across various tumor types. These reversion mutations were rare; this may be because some patients may not have had repeat profiling post-treatment. Repeat tumor profiling at times of treatment resistance can help inform therapy selection in the refractory disease setting.
Collapse
|