1
|
How JA, Jazaeri AA, Westin SN, Lawson BC, Klopp AH, Soliman PT, Lu KH. Translating biological insights into improved management of endometrial cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:781-800. [PMID: 39198622 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-024-00934-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological cancer among women in high-income countries, with both incidence and mortality continuing to increase. The complexity of the management of patients with EC has evolved with greater comprehension of the underlying biology and heterogeneity of this disease. With a growing number of novel therapeutic agents available, emerging treatment regimens seem to have the potential to help to address the concerning trends in EC-related mortality. In this Review, we describe the epidemiology, histopathology and molecular classification of EC as well as the role of the new (2023) International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) staging model. Furthermore, we provide an overview of disease management in the first-line and recurrent disease settings. With increasing use of molecular profiling and updates in treatment paradigms, we also summarize new developments in this rapidly changing treatment landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A How
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Amir A Jazaeri
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barrett C Lawson
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ann H Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pamela T Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Casas-Arozamena C, Vilar A, Cueva J, Arias E, Sampayo V, Diaz E, Oltra SS, Moiola CP, Cabrera S, Cortegoso A, Curiel T, Abalo A, Pamies Serrano M, Domingo S, Padilla-Iserte P, Arnaez de la Cruz M, Hernández A, García-Pineda V, Ruiz-Bañobre J, López R, Matias-Guiu X, Colás E, Gil-Moreno A, Abal M, Moreno-Bueno G, Muinelo-Romay L. Role of cfDNA and ctDNA to improve the risk stratification and the disease follow-up in patients with endometrial cancer: towards the clinical application. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2024; 43:264. [PMID: 39304963 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-03158-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been a rise in endometrial cancer (EC) incidence leading to increased mortality. To counter this trend, improving the stratification of post-surgery recurrence risk and anticipating disease relapse and treatment resistance is essential. Liquid biopsy analyses offer a promising tool for these clinical challenges, though the best strategy for applying them in EC must be defined. This study was designed to determine the value of cfDNA/ctDNA monitoring in improving the clinical management of patients with localized and recurrent disease. METHODS Plasma samples and uterine aspirates (UA) from 198 EC patients were collected at surgery and over time. The genetic landscape of UAs was characterized using targeted sequencing. Total cfDNA was analyzed for ctDNA presence based on the UA mutational profile. RESULTS High cfDNA levels and detectable ctDNA at baseline correlated with poor prognosis for DFS (p-value < 0.0001; HR = 9.25) and DSS (p-value < 0.0001; HR = 11.20). This remained clinically significant when stratifying tumors by histopathological risk factors. Of note, cfDNA/ctDNA analyses discriminated patients with early post-surgery relapse and the ctDNA kinetics served to identify patients undergoing relapse before any clinical evidence emerged. CONCLUSIONS This is the most comprehensive study on cfDNA/ctDNA characterization in EC, demonstrating its value in improving risk stratification and anticipating disease relapse in patients with localized disease. CtDNA kinetics assessment complements current strategies to monitor the disease evolution and the treatment response. Therefore, implementing cfDNA/ctDNA monitoring in clinical routines offers a unique opportunity to improve EC management. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE The study demonstrates that high levels of cfDNA and detectable ctDNA at baseline are strong indicators of poor prognosis. This enables more accurate risk stratification beyond traditional histopathological factors, allowing clinicians to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from more aggressive treatment and closer monitoring. Moreover, longitudinal analysis of cfDNA/ctDNA can detect disease recurrence months before clinical symptoms or imaging evidence appear. This early warning system offers a significant advantage in clinical practice, providing a window of opportunity for early intervention and potentially improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Casas-Arozamena
- Translational Medical Oncology Group (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Trav. Choupana s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
- University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Praza do Obradoiro, 0, Santiago de Compostela, 15705, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Vilar
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Trav. Choupana s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
| | - Juan Cueva
- Translational Medical Oncology Group (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Trav. Choupana s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
| | - Efigenia Arias
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Trav. Choupana s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
| | - Victoria Sampayo
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Trav. Choupana s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
| | - Eva Diaz
- MD Anderson Cancer Center Foundation, C/Gómez Hemans 2, Madrid, 28033, Spain
| | - Sara S Oltra
- MD Anderson Cancer Center Foundation, C/Gómez Hemans 2, Madrid, 28033, Spain
| | - Cristian Pablo Moiola
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, 119-129 Pg. Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, 08035, Spain
- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences at Manresa, University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Av. Universitària, 4-6, Manresa, 08242, Spain
| | - Silvia Cabrera
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, 119-129 Pg. Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, 08035, Spain
| | - Alexandra Cortegoso
- Translational Medical Oncology Group (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Trav. Choupana s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
| | - Teresa Curiel
- Translational Medical Oncology Group (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Trav. Choupana s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
| | - Alicia Abalo
- Translational Medical Oncology Group (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Trav. Choupana s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
| | - Mónica Pamies Serrano
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, 119-129 Pg. Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, 08035, Spain
| | - Santiago Domingo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Pablo Padilla-Iserte
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marta Arnaez de la Cruz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alicia Hernández
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital "La Paz", Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Juan Ruiz-Bañobre
- Translational Medical Oncology Group (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Trav. Choupana s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
| | - Rafael López
- Translational Medical Oncology Group (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Trav. Choupana s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
- University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Praza do Obradoiro, 0, Santiago de Compostela, 15705, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Hospital U de Bellvitge and Hospital U Arnau de Vilanova, Universities of Lleida and Barcelona, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Colás
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, 119-129 Pg. Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, 08035, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, 119-129 Pg. Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, 08035, Spain
| | - Miguel Abal
- Translational Medical Oncology Group (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Trav. Choupana s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
- University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Praza do Obradoiro, 0, Santiago de Compostela, 15705, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Gema Moreno-Bueno
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain.
- MD Anderson Cancer Center Foundation, C/Gómez Hemans 2, Madrid, 28033, Spain.
- Instituto de Investigaciones Biomedicas "Sols-Morreale" CSIC-UAM, C/Arturo Dupurier 4, Madrid, 28029, Spain.
| | - Laura Muinelo-Romay
- Translational Medical Oncology Group (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Trav. Choupana s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain.
- University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Praza do Obradoiro, 0, Santiago de Compostela, 15705, Spain.
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim SH, Weigelt B. Circulating cell-free (cf)DNA analysis: Current technologies and applications in gynecologic cancer. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2024; 54:101431. [PMID: 38947418 PMCID: PMC11211888 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis has several promising clinical applications in the management of cancer patients, with clinical validity established in different types of solid tumors (e.g., lung, breast, and colon cancer). Cancers harbor unique genetic alterations that can be detected in the plasma and other bodily fluids of cancer patients, constituting an alternate source of tumor-derived DNA. Technologic advances and wide-spread availability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) have made sequencing analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) possible, employing both off-the-shelf and personalized tumor-informed panels. Tumor size, disease burden and high-grade histologic types have been shown to correlate with ctDNA levels across multiple solid cancer types. Detection of tumor-derived genetic alterations in plasma-derived cfDNA can facilitate diagnosis, guide treatment selection, and serve as a biomarker for treatment response and prognostication. Molecular residual disease (MRD) is at the forefront of cfDNA analysis, with implications in treatment de-escalation/ escalation in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. The development of cfDNA analysis in early detection of cancers is under active investigation. Proof-of-principles studies in gynecologic cancers have demonstrated feasibility and potential for innovation in cancers lacking specific biomarkers, including the tracking of human papillomavirus (HPV) cfDNA in patients with cervical cancer. In this review, we outline the assays currently available for cfDNA sequencing/ ctDNA detection, the role of cfDNA analysis in clinical decision-making and the current status and potential clinical uses of cfDNA research in gynecologic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah H Kim
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jamieson A, McConechy MK, Lum A, Senz J, Dowhy T, Huntsman DG, McAlpine JN. Selective utilization of circulating tumor DNA testing enables disease monitoring in endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. J Gynecol Oncol 2024; 36:36.e5. [PMID: 38909641 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Biomarkers reflecting real-time response to therapy and recurrence are lacking. We assessed the clinical value of detecting cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutations in endometrial cancer (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC) patients. METHODS EC/OC patients undergoing primary surgery were consented for tissue banking and 2-year serial blood draws. Tumor tissue DNA and plasma ctDNA underwent next generation sequencing using a targeted gene panel to identify somatic mutations. RESULTS Of 44 patients (24 EC, 17 OC, 2 synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas [SEOC] and 1 endocervical adenocarcinoma [EA]) at least one somatic mutation was identified in tumor tissue in 40 (91%, 20/24 EC, all OC/SEOC/EA), and in preoperative plasma ctDNA in 12 (27%) patients (6/24 [25%] EC and 6/17 [35%] OC). Detection of preoperative ctDNA mutations was associated with advanced stage, higher preoperative CA125, and disease recurrence. In 5/12 (42%) patients with preoperative ctDNA mutations, examination/imaging suggested clinical stage I however final pathology revealed stage II/III. In 11 patients where serial timepoints were assessed during treatment for ctDNA and CA125, ctDNA clearance preceded normalization of CA125. Thirteen patients developed recurrent disease (4 EC, 8 OC, 1 EA); 8 in whom ctDNA mutations were detected postoperatively, and 4 followed through time of recurrence with ctDNA mutations identified 2-5 months prior to clinical/radiologic/biomarker progression in 3. CONCLUSION ctDNA can reflect larger tumor volume/metastases, treatment response and recurrence in EC and OC. Careful patient selection is critical to direct resources to patients most likely to benefit, considering disease burden and risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Jamieson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Amy Lum
- Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Janine Senz
- Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - David G Huntsman
- Imagia Canexia Health, Inc., Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gupta A, Gazzo A, Selenica P, Safonov A, Pareja F, da Silva EM, Brown DN, Zhu Y, Patel J, Blanco-Heredia J, Stefanovska B, Carpenter MA, Pei X, Frosina D, Jungbluth AA, Ladanyi M, Curigliano G, Weigelt B, Riaz N, Powell SN, Razavi P, Harris RS, Reis-Filho JS, Marra A, Chandarlapaty S. APOBEC3 mutagenesis drives therapy resistance in breast cancer. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.04.29.591453. [PMID: 38746158 PMCID: PMC11092499 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.29.591453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Acquired genetic alterations commonly drive resistance to endocrine and targeted therapies in metastatic breast cancer 1-7 , however the underlying processes engendering these diverse alterations are largely uncharacterized. To identify the mutational processes operant in breast cancer and their impact on clinical outcomes, we utilized a well-annotated cohort of 3,880 patient samples with paired tumor-normal sequencing data. The mutational signatures associated with apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like 3 (APOBEC3) enzymes were highly prevalent and enriched in post-treatment compared to treatment-naïve hormone receptor-positive (HR+) cancers. APOBEC3 mutational signatures were independently associated with shorter progression-free survival on antiestrogen plus CDK4/6 inhibitor combination therapy in patients with HR+ metastatic breast cancer. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) of breast cancer models and selected paired primary-metastatic samples demonstrated that active APOBEC3 mutagenesis promoted resistance to both endocrine and targeted therapies through characteristic alterations such as RB1 loss-of-function mutations. Evidence of APOBEC3 activity in pre-treatment samples illustrated a pervasive role for this mutational process in breast cancer evolution. The study reveals APOBEC3 mutagenesis to be a frequent mediator of therapy resistance in breast cancer and highlights its potential as a biomarker and target for overcoming resistance.
Collapse
|
6
|
Pomerantz T, Brooks R. Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) and Its Role in Gynecologic Malignancies. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:510-522. [PMID: 38472567 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01180-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) refers to small fragments of DNA released into the bloodstream by cancer cells. It is obtained through "liquid biopsy;" which most commonly refers to plasma or blood samples, but can be obtained from a number of bodily fluids including ascitic fluid, saliva, and even urine and stool. ctDNA is detected via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS). The DNA from these samples is analyzed for the detection of point mutations, copy-number alterations, gene fusion, and DNA methylation. These results have the potential for use in cancer diagnosis, determining prognosis, targeting gene-specific therapies, and monitoring for/predicting disease recurrence and response to treatment. ctDNA offers an alternative to tissue biopsy; it is less invasive and can be monitored serially over time without multiple procedures. Moreover it may have the ability to detect disease recurrence or predict behavior in a way that solid tissue biopsies, tumor marker surveillance, and imaging cannot. Recent explosion in interest in ctDNA shows promising developments for widespread adoption of these techniques in cancer care. However, the use of ctDNA in diagnosis and treatment of gynecologic malignancies is currently limited, compared to adoption in other solid-organ tumors such as breast and colorectal cancers. Compared to other cancer types, there appear to be fewer comprehensive studies and clinical validations specifically focusing on the use of ctDNA in gynecologic cancers. More research is needed in this area to advance the potential for use of ctDNA in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers before this can be routinely adopted to improve care for patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tali Pomerantz
- University of California Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y Street, Suite 2500, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
| | - Rebecca Brooks
- University of California Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y Street, Suite 2500, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Soberanis Pina P, Lheureux S. Novel Molecular Targets in Endometrial Cancer: Mechanisms and Perspectives for Therapy. Biologics 2024; 18:79-93. [PMID: 38529411 PMCID: PMC10962462 DOI: 10.2147/btt.s369783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) has a high epidemiological impact with incidence and mortality rising worldwide. In recent years, the integration of the pathologic and molecular classification has provided relevant information to understand the heterogeneity in the biology of EC, which led to the evolution in the management of patients. Currently, therapeutic breakthroughs have been made in advanced EC to improve oncologic outcomes, with efforts to include patient reported outcomes. Precision and personalized medicine are under way in EC exploring different combination approaches to target cross-talk pathways, cancer cell microenvironment, and metabolic vulnerabilities and improve drug delivery. Yet, collaborative efforts are needed to face the challenges in practice by refining patient selection, ideal biomarker identification, and de-escalation of therapies according to emerging molecular and genomic features of EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Soberanis Pina
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Recio F, Scalise CB, Loar P, Lumish M, Berman T, Peddada A, Kalashnikova E, Rivero-Hinojosa S, Beisch T, Nicosia B, Farmer T, Dutta P, Malhotra M, ElNaggar AC, Liu MC, Vaccarello L, Holloway RW. Post-surgical ctDNA-based molecular residual disease detection in patients with stage I uterine malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 182:63-69. [PMID: 38262240 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Among uterine malignancies, endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common cancer of the female reproductive tract. Traditionally, risk stratification in EC is determined by standard clinicopathological risk factors. Although circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a prognostic biomarker in various malignancies, its clinical validity in EC remains to be established. METHODS In this analysis of real-world data, 267 plasma samples from 101 patients with stage I EC were analyzed using a tumor-informed ctDNA assay (Signatera™ bespoke mPCR-NGS). Patients were followed post-surgically and monitored with ctDNA testing for a median of 6.8 months (range: 0.37-19.1). RESULTS Patients who tested ctDNA-positive at both their first time point and longitudinally experienced inferior recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 6.2; p = 0.0006 and HR = 15.5; p < 0.0001, respectively), and showed a recurrence rate of 58% and 52%, vs. 6% and 0%, respectively for the ctDNA-negative patients. Most ctDNA-positive patients had high-risk histologies or sarcoma, versus low-risk and high-intermediate risk (H-IR) EC. Furthermore, patients with high-risk histologies who were ctDNA-positive showed shorter RFS compared to those who tested negative (HR = 9.5; p = 0.007), and those who tested positive in the low/H-IR cohort (HR = 0.25; p = 0.04). Post-surgically, detectable ctDNA was highly prognostic of clinical outcome and remained the only significant risk factor for recurrence when adjusted for clinicopathological risk factors, such as histologic risk group, mismatch repair (MMR), and p53 status. CONCLUSION Incorporating ctDNA monitoring along with traditional known risk factors may aid in identifying patients with stage I EC who are at highest risk of recurrence, and possibly aid in treatment stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Recio
- AdventHealth Orlando Gynecologic Oncology, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Tara Berman
- Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Blitzer GC, Zhao SG, Bradley KA, Hartenbach EM. The role of ctDNA in endometrial cancer: A tool for risk stratification and disease monitoring. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 178:170-171. [PMID: 37648640 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Grace C Blitzer
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Human Oncology, United States of America.
| | - Shuang G Zhao
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Human Oncology, United States of America
| | - Kristin A Bradley
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Human Oncology, United States of America
| | - Ellen M Hartenbach
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li J, Li X, Quan C, Li X, Wan C, Wu X. Genomic profile of Chinese patients with endometrial carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:888. [PMID: 37730563 PMCID: PMC10512642 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11382-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed gynecologic malignancy in China. However, the genetic profile of Chinese EC patients has not been well established yet. METHODS In current study, 158 Chinese EC patients were subjected to next-generation sequencing assay (74 took testing of EC-related 20-genes panel, and 84 took the expanded panel). Of the 158 patients, 91 patients were performed germline mutation testing using the expanded panel. Moreover, the public datasets from TCGA and MSKCC were utilized to compare the genomic differences between Chinese and Western EC patients. The proteomic and transcriptomic from CPTAC and TCGA were derived and performed unsupervised clustering to identify molecular subtypes. RESULTS Among the 158 patients analyzed, a significant majority (85.4%) exihibited at least one somatic alteration, with the most prevalent alterations occurring in PTEN, PIK3CA, TP53, and ARID1A. These genomic alterations were mainly enriched in the PI3K, cell cycle, RAS/RAF/MAPK, Epigenetic modifiers/Chromatin remodelers, and DNA damage repair (DDR) signaling pathways. Additionally, we identified ten individuals (11.0%) with pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline alterations in seven genes, with the DDR pathway being predominantly involved. Compared to Western EC patients, Chinese EC patients displayed different prevalence in AKT1, MET, PMS2, PIK3R1, and CTCF. Notably, 69.6% of Chinese EC patients were identified with actionable alterations. In addition, we discovered novel molecular subtypes in ARID1A wild-type patients, characterized by an inferior prognosis, higher TP53 but fewer PTEN and PIK3CA alterations. Additionally, this subtype exhibited a significantly higher abundance of macrophages and activated dendritic cells. CONCLUSION Our study has contributed valuable insights into the unique germline and somatic genomic profiles of Chinese EC patients, enhancing our understanding of their biological characteristics and potential therapeutic avenues. Furthermore, we have highlighted the presence of molecular heterogeneity in ARID1A-wild type EC patients, shedding light on the complexity of this subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Li
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoqi Li
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Chenlian Quan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoqiu Li
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Chong Wan
- Precision Medicine Center, Yangtze Delta Region Institute of Tsinghua University, Jiaxing, China
| | - Xiaohua Wu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Costas L, Onieva I, Pelegrina B, Marin F, Carmona Á, López-Querol M, Frias-Gomez J, Peremiquel-Trillas P, Martínez JM, Dorca E, Brunet J, Pineda M, Ponce J, Matias-Guiu X, de Sanjosé S, Bosch FX, Alemany L, Paytubi S. Evaluation of Somatic Mutations in Urine Samples as a Noninvasive Method for the Detection and Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3681-3690. [PMID: 37439797 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current diagnostic methods for endometrial cancer lack specificity, leading to many women undergoing invasive procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate somatic mutations in urine to accurately discriminate patients with endometrial cancer from controls. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Overall, 72 samples were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) with molecular identifiers targeting 47 genes. We evaluated urine supernatant samples from women with endometrial cancer (n = 19) and age-matched controls (n = 20). Cell pellets from urine and plasma samples from seven cases were sequenced; further, we also evaluated paired tumor samples from all cases. Finally, immunohistochemical markers for molecular profiling were evaluated in all tumor samples. RESULTS Overall, we were able to identify mutations in DNA from urine supernatant samples in 100% of endometrial cancers. In contrast, only one control (5%) showed variants at a variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥ 2% in the urine supernatant samples. The molecular classification obtained by using tumor samples and urine samples showed good agreement. Analyses in paired samples revealed a higher number of mutations and VAF in urine supernatants than in urine cell pellets and blood samples. CONCLUSIONS Evaluation of somatic mutations using urine samples may offer a user-friendly and reliable tool for endometrial cancer detection and molecular classification. The diagnostic performance for endometrial cancer detection was very high, and cases could be molecularly classified using these noninvasive and self-collected samples. Additional multicenter evaluations using larger sample sizes are needed to validate the results and understand the potential of urine samples for the early detection and prognosis of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Costas
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - Irene Onieva
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Beatriz Pelegrina
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fátima Marin
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Cancer - CIBERONC, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, ONCOBELL Program, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Marta López-Querol
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jon Frias-Gomez
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paula Peremiquel-Trillas
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Manuel Martínez
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Dorca
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Brunet
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Cancer - CIBERONC, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, ONCOBELL Program, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBGI, Girona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Doctor Josep Trueta Girona University Hospital, Girona, Spain
| | - Marta Pineda
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Cancer - CIBERONC, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, ONCOBELL Program, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Ponce
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Cancer - CIBERONC, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Francesc Xavier Bosch
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
- Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laia Alemany
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sonia Paytubi
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pelegrina B, Paytubi S, Marin F, Martínez JM, Carmona Á, Frias-Gomez J, Peremiquel-Trillas P, Dorca E, Zanca A, López-Querol M, Onieva I, Benavente Y, Barahona M, Fernandez-Gonzalez S, De Francisco J, Caño V, Vidal A, Pijuan L, Canet-Hermida J, Dueñas N, Brunet J, Pineda M, Matias-Guiu X, Ponce J, Bosch FX, De Sanjosé S, Alemany L, Costas L. Evaluation of somatic mutations in cervicovaginal samples as a non-invasive method for the detection and molecular classification of endometrial cancer. EBioMedicine 2023; 94:104716. [PMID: 37480623 PMCID: PMC10393602 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of endometrial cancer is increasing worldwide. While delays in diagnosis reduce survival, case molecular misclassification might be associated with under- and over-treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate genetic alterations to detect and molecularly classify cases of endometrial cancer using non-invasive samples. METHODS Consecutive patients with incident endometrial cancer (N = 139) and controls (N = 107) from a recent Spanish case-control study were included in this analysis. Overall, 339 cervicovaginal samples (out of which 228 were clinician-collected and 111 were self-collected) were analysed using a test based on next-generation sequencing (NGS), which targets 47 genes. Immunohistochemical markers were evaluated in 133 tumour samples. A total of 159 samples were used to train the detection algorithm and 180 samples were used for validation. FINDINGS Overall, 73% (N = 94 out of 129 clinician-collected samples, and N = 66 out of 90 self-collected samples) of endometrial cancer cases had detectable mutations in clinician-collected and self-collected samples, while the specificity was 80% (79/99) for clinician-collected samples and 90% (19/21) for self-collected samples. The molecular classifications obtained using tumour samples and non-invasive gynaecologic samples in our study showed moderate-to-good agreement. The molecular classification of cases of endometrial cancer into four groups using NGS of both clinician-collected and self-collected cervicovaginal samples yielded significant differences in disease-free survival. The cases with mutations in POLE had an excellent prognosis, whereas the cases with TP53 mutations had the poorest clinical outcome, which is consistent with the data on tumour samples. INTERPRETATION This study classified endometrial cancer cases into four molecular groups based on the analysis of cervicovaginal samples that showed significant differences in disease-free survival. The molecular classification of endometrial cancer in non-invasive samples may improve patient care and survival by indicating the early need for aggressive surgery, as well as reducing referrals to highly specialized hospitals in cancers with good prognosis. Validation in independent sets will confirm the potential for molecular classification in non-invasive samples. FUNDING This study was funded by a competitive grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III through the projects PI19/01835, PI23/00790, and FI20/00031, CIBERESP CB06/02/0073 and CIBERONC CB16/12/00231, CB16/12/00234 (Co-funded by European Regional Development Fund. ERDF: A way to build Europe). Samples and data were provided by Biobank HUB-ICO-IDIBELL, integrated into the Spanish Biobank Network, and funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PT20/00171) and by Xarxa de Bancs de Tumors de Catalunya (XBTC) sponsored by Pla Director d'Oncologia de Catalunya. This work was supported in part by the AECC, Grupos estables (GCTRA18014MATI). It also counts with the support of the Secretariat for Universities and Research of the Department of Business and Knowledge of the Generalitat de Catalunya, and grants to support the activities of research groups 2021SGR01354 and 2021SGR1112.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz Pelegrina
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Av Gran Vía 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sonia Paytubi
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Av Gran Vía 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fátima Marin
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Cancer - CIBERONC, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, ONCOBELL Program, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Manuel Martínez
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jon Frias-Gomez
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Av Gran Vía 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paula Peremiquel-Trillas
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Av Gran Vía 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Dorca
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alba Zanca
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Cancer - CIBERONC, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta López-Querol
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Av Gran Vía 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irene Onieva
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Av Gran Vía 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yolanda Benavente
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Av Gran Vía 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marc Barahona
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergi Fernandez-Gonzalez
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier De Francisco
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Víctor Caño
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - August Vidal
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Cancer - CIBERONC, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lara Pijuan
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Cancer - CIBERONC, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Júlia Canet-Hermida
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Cancer - CIBERONC, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, ONCOBELL Program, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Núria Dueñas
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Cancer - CIBERONC, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, ONCOBELL Program, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Brunet
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Cancer - CIBERONC, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, ONCOBELL Program, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBGI, Girona, Spain; Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Doctor Josep Trueta Girona University Hospital, Girona, Spain
| | - Marta Pineda
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Cancer - CIBERONC, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, ONCOBELL Program, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Cancer - CIBERONC, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Ponce
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Xavier Bosch
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Av Gran Vía 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia De Sanjosé
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Consultant, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA; ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laia Alemany
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Av Gran Vía 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Costas
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Av Gran Vía 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Av. De Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|