Additional Oncogenic Alterations in RAS-Driven Differentiated Thyroid Cancers Associate with Worse Clinicopathologic Outcomes

Risk stratification by combining common genetic mutations and TERT promoter methylation in papillary thyroid cancer

PURPOSE

Risk stratification based on somatic mutations in TERT promoter and BRAF/RAS has been well established for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), and there is emerging evidence showed that TERT promoter methylation was frequently observed in thyroid cancer patients with adverse features. This study was aimed to comprehensive explore the prognostic value of BRAF/RAS mutations, TERT promoter mutations, and TERT promoter methylation in PTC.

METHODS

The relationships of BRAF/RAS mutations, TERT promoter mutations, and TERT promoter methylation with clinical characteristics and outcomes of PTC were analyzed in 382 patients with PTC.

RESULTS

TERT promoter mutation and hypermethylation were collectively observed in 52 (13.6%) samples and associated with BRAF/RAS mutation, aggressive clinical characteristics, and poor clinical outcomes of PTC. Coexistence of BRAF/RAS and TERT alterations was found in 45 of 382 (11.8%) PTC patients and strongly associated with old patient age, extrathyroidal extension, advanced pathologic T stage and metastasis. Importantly, patients with both BRAF/RAS and TERT alterations had higher rates of tumor recurrence (13.6% vs 1.5%, P = 0.042) and disease progression (24.4% vs 3.3%, P < 0.001) than patients without any alterations, and cox regression analysis revealed that the coexistence of BRAF/RAS and TERT alterations, but not BRAF/RAS or TERT alterations alone, increased the risk of progression-free interval with an adjusted HR of 10.35 (95% CI: 1.79-59.81, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that comprehensively analysis of BRAF/RAS mutations, TERT promoter mutation and methylation is an effective strategy to identify high-risk patients with PTC.

Emerging therapeutic options for follicular-derived thyroid cancer in the era of immunotherapy

Although most follicular-derived thyroid cancers are well differentiated and have an overall excellent prognosis following treatment with surgery and radioiodine, management of advanced thyroid cancers, including iodine refractory disease and poorly differentiated/undifferentiated subtypes, is more challenging. Over the past decade, better understanding of the genetic drivers and immune milieu of advanced thyroid cancers has led to significant progress in the management of these patients. Numerous targeted kinase inhibitors are now approved by the U.S Food and Drug administration (FDA) for the treatment of advanced, radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC) as well as anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). Immunotherapy has also been thoroughly studied and has shown promise in selected cases. In this review, we summarize the progress in the understanding of the genetic landscape and the cellular and molecular basis of radioiodine refractory-DTC and ATC, as well as discuss the current treatment options and future therapeutic avenues.

Drug repositioning in thyroid cancer: from point mutations to gene fusions

The diagnosis of thyroid cancer (TC) has increased dramatically in recent years. Papillary TC is the most frequent type and has shown a good prognosis. Conventional treatments for TC are surgery, hormonal therapy, radioactive iodine, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. However, resistance to treatments is well documented in almost 20% of all cases. Genomic sequencing has provided valuable information to help identify variants that hinder the success of chemotherapy as well as to determine which of those represent potentially druggable targets. There is a plethora of targeted therapies for cancer, most of them directed toward point mutations; however, chromosomal rearrangements that generate fusion genes are becoming relevant in cancer but have been less explored in TC. Therefore, it is relevant to identify new potential inhibitors for genes that are recurrent in the formation of gene fusions. In this review, we focus on describing potentially druggable variants and propose both point variants and fusion genes as targets for drug repositioning in TC.

Characterizing Genetic Alterations Related to Radioiodine Avidity in Metastatic Thyroid Cancer

CONTEXT

Patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) with distant metastasis (DM) are usually not recognized as radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory DTC in a timely manner. The elucidation of genetic features related to RAI uptake patterns may shed light on the early recognition of RAI-refractory DTC.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to elucidate the underlying molecular features behind different RAI uptake patterns.

METHODS

A total of 214 patients with DM-DTC were retrospectively included in the analysis. RAI uptake patterns were defined as initially RAI refractory (I-RAIR) and initially RAI avid (I-RAIA) according to the first post-treatment scan, then I-RAIA was further divided into continually RAIA (C-RAIA), partly RAIR (P-RAIR), and gradually RAIR (G-RAIR) according to subsequent scans. The molecular subtype groups-BRAFV600E mutated, RAS mutated, fusions, and others-were classified according to main driver genes status.

RESULTS

BRAF, TERT promoter, and TP53 mutations are more frequently detected in the I-RAIR pattern while RET fusions and RAS mutations are more frequent in the I-RAIA pattern. A late-hit mutation including TERT, TP53, or PIK3CA is more common in I-RAIR than that in I-RAIA (50.0% vs 26.9%, P = .001), particularly for those with RAS mutations in the I-RAIR group, always accompanied by TERT promoter. Isolated RET fusions accounts for 10% of I-RAIR. When compared among driver gene groups, BRAFV600E-mutated tumors have a higher rate of the I-RAIR pattern (64.4%) than RAS-mutated (4.5%, P < .001) and fusion-positive (20.7%, P < .001) tumors. In I-RAIA subgroups, BRAFV600E-mutated tumors have lower prevalence of the C-RAIA pattern than those with RAS mutation or fusions.

CONCLUSION

Patients with the I-RAIR pattern predominantly featured mutations of the BRAF and/or TERT promoter, of which RAS mutations were usually accompanied by late-hit mutations, while fusions mostly occurred alone.

The prognostic power of gene mutations in thyroid cancer

The introduction and generalization of next-generation sequencing techniques have significantly increased the identification of mutations in thyroid tumors from multiple patient cohorts. The understanding of the association between specific mutations and clinical outcomes is gradually leading to individualizing the care of patients with thyroid cancer. BRAFV600 is the most common mutation seen in thyroid cancer patients and unequivocally predicts malignancy, but when considered in isolation, it is not recommended to be used as an independent prognostic factor. Mutations in RAS are the second most common alterations in thyroid cancer but can be found in benign and malignant lesions. Rearrangements involving receptor tyrosine kinases, primarily RET, are found in a subset of thyroid tumors without mutations in either BRAF or RAS. The assessment of additional mutations is increasingly employed in thyroid cancer prognostication. The coexistence of BRAF with alterations in genes such as PIK3CA, TERT promoter, or TP53 is associated with less favorable outcomes. Similar studies have also shown that additional oncogenic mutations in RAS-mutant thyroid carcinoma, such as those affecting the EIF1AX gene, likely predict a more aggressive clinicopathologic behavior. Overall, emerging evidence suggests that the co-occurrence of specific alterations in defined genes with BRAF or RAS mutations can become prognostic tools and useful predictors of thyroid tumor aggressiveness.

Genomic alterations in thyroid cancer: biological and clinical insights

Tumours can arise from thyroid follicular cells if they acquire driver mutations that constitutively activate the MAPK signalling pathway. In addition, a limited set of additional mutations in key genes drive tumour progression towards more aggressive and less differentiated disease. Unprecedented insights into thyroid tumour biology have come from the breadth of thyroid tumour sequencing data from patients and the wide range of mutation-specific mechanisms identified in experimental models, in combination with the genomic simplicity of thyroid cancers. This knowledge is gradually being translated into refined strategies to stratify, manage and treat patients with thyroid cancer. This Review summarizes the biological underpinnings of the genetic alterations involved in thyroid cancer initiation and progression. We also provide a rationale for and discuss specific examples of how to implement genomic information to inform both recommended and investigational approaches to improve thyroid cancer prognosis, redifferentiation strategies and targeted therapies.

Fusion Oncogenes in Patients With Locally Advanced or Distant Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

CONTEXT

Fusion oncogenes are involved in the underlying pathology of advanced differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and even the cause of radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractoriness.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigation between fusion oncogenes and clinicopathological characteristics involving a large-scale cohort of patients with advanced DTC.

METHODS

We collected 278 tumor samples from patients with locally advanced (N1b or T4) or distant metastatic DTC. Targeted next-generation sequencing with a 26-gene ThyroLead panel was performed on these samples.

RESULTS

Fusion oncogenes accounted for 29.86% of the samples (72 rearrangement during transfection (RET) fusions, 7 neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions, 4 anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions) and occurred more frequently in pediatric patients than in their adult counterparts (P = .003, OR 2.411, 95% CI 1.329-4.311) in our cohort. DTCs with fusion oncogenes appeared to have a more advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)_N and AJCC_M stage (P = .0002, OR 15.47, 95% CI 2.54-160.9, and P = .016, OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.18-4.81) than those without. DTCs with fusion oncogenes were associated with pediatric radioactive iodine (RAI) refractoriness compared with those without fusion oncogenes (P = .017, OR 4.85, 95% CI 1.29-15.19). However, in adult DTCs, those with fusion oncogenes were less likely to be associated with RAI refractoriness than those without (P = .029, OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27-0.95), owing to a high occurrence of the TERT mutation, which was the most prominent genetic risk factor for RAI refractoriness in multivariate logistic regression analysis (P < .001, OR 7.36, 95% CI 3.14-17.27).

CONCLUSION

Fusion oncogenes were more prevalent in pediatric DTCs than in their adult counterparts and were associated with pediatric RAI refractoriness, while in adult DTCs, TERT mutation was the dominant genetic contributor to RAI refractoriness rather than fusion oncogenes.

Update on current diagnosis and management of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma

Well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma has a favorable prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of over 95%. However, the undifferentiated or anaplastic type accounting for < 0.2%, usually in elderly individuals, exhibits a dismal prognosis with rapid growth and disappointing outcomes. It is the most aggressive form of thyroid carcinoma, with a median survival of 5 mo and poor quality of life (airway obstruction, dysphagia, hoarseness, persistent pain). Early diagnosis and staging are crucial. Diagnostic tools include biopsy (fine needle aspiration, core needle, open surgery), high-resolution ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, [(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomo-graphy/computed tomography, liquid biopsy and microRNAs. The BRAF gene (BRAF-V600E and BRAF wild type) is the most often found molecular factor. Others include the genes RET, KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS. Recent management policy is based on surgery, even debulking, chemotherapy (cisplatin or doxorubicin), radiotherapy (adjuvant or definitive), targeted biological agents and immunotherapy. The last two options constitute novel hopeful management modalities improving the overall survival in these otherwise condemned patients. Anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody immunotherapy, stem cell targeted therapies, nanotechnology achievements and artificial intelligence imple-mentation provide novel promising alternatives. Genetic mutations determine molecular pathways, thus indicating novel treatment strategies such as anti-BRAF, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-A, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor. Treatment with the combination of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and the MEK inhibitor trametinib has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration in cases with BRAF-V600E gene mutations and is currently the standard care. This neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery ensures a two-year overall survival of 80%. Prognostic factors for improved outcomes have been found to be younger age, earlier tumor stage and radiation therapy. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary, and the therapeutic plan should be individualized based on surveillance and epidemiology end results.