1
|
Teraiya M, Perreault H, Chen VC. An overview of glioblastoma multiforme and temozolomide resistance: can LC-MS-based proteomics reveal the fundamental mechanism of temozolomide resistance? Front Oncol 2023; 13:1166207. [PMID: 37182181 PMCID: PMC10169742 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1166207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a primary type of lethal brain tumor. Over the last two decades, temozolomide (TMZ) has remained the primary chemotherapy for GBM. However, TMZ resistance in GBM constitutes an underlying factor contributing to high rates of mortality. Despite intense efforts to understand the mechanisms of therapeutic resistance, there is currently a poor understanding of the molecular processes of drug resistance. For TMZ, several mechanisms linked to therapeutic resistance have been proposed. In the past decade, significant progress in the field of mass spectrometry-based proteomics has been made. This review article discusses the molecular drivers of GBM, within the context of TMZ resistance with a particular emphasis on the potential benefits and insights of using global proteomic techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milan Teraiya
- Chemistry Department, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Helene Perreault
- Chemistry Department, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Vincent C. Chen
- Chemistry Department, Brandon University, Brandon, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Challenges in the treatment of small cell lung cancer in the era of immunotherapy and molecular classification. Lung Cancer 2023; 175:88-100. [PMID: 36493578 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
For many years the standard of care for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has remained unchanged. Despite decades of active research, current treatment options are limited and the prognosis of patients with extended disease (ED) SCLC remains poor. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents an exception and the only recent approval for ED-SCLC. However, the magnitude of benefit obtained with immunotherapy in SCLC is much more modest than that observed in other malignancies. Different pro-immunogenic or immunosuppressive features within the tumor microenvironment of SCLC may either modulate the sensitivity to immunotherapy or conversely dampen the efficacy of ICIs. Beside immunotherapy, a deeper understanding of the molecular biology of SCLC has led to the identification of new therapeutic targets for this lethal malignancy. Recent epigenetic and gene expression studies have resulted into a new molecular classification of four distinct subtypes of SCLC, defined by the relative expression of key transcription regulators and each characterized by specific therapeutic vulnerabilities. This review discusses the rationale for immunotherapy in SCLC and summarizes the main ICIs-trials in this tumor. We provide also an overview of new potential therapeutic opportunities and their integration with the new molecular classification of SCLC.
Collapse
|
3
|
Therapeutic Potential of PARP Inhibitors in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancers. Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9081024. [PMID: 34440228 PMCID: PMC8392860 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9081024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies are a major global health burden, with high mortality rates. The identification of novel therapeutic strategies is crucial to improve treatment and survival of patients. The poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes involved in the DNA damage response (DDR) play major roles in the development, progression and treatment response of cancer, with PARP inhibitors (PARPi) currently used in the clinic for breast, ovarian, fallopian, primary peritoneal, pancreatic and prostate cancers with deficiencies in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. This article examines the current evidence for the role of the DDR PARP enzymes (PARP1, 2, 3 and 4) in the development, progression and treatment response of GI cancers. Furthermore, we discuss the role of HR status as a predictive biomarker of PARPi efficacy in GI cancer patients and examine the pre-clinical and clinical evidence for PARPi and cytotoxic therapy combination strategies in GI cancer. We also include an analysis of the genomic and transcriptomic landscape of the DDR PARP genes and key HR genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, RAD51, MRE11, PALB2) in GI patient tumours (n = 1744) using publicly available datasets to identify patients that may benefit from PARPi therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
|
4
|
In Vitro Effects of Selective COX and LOX Inhibitors and Their Combinations with Antineoplastic Drugs in the Mouse Melanoma Cell Line B16F10. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22126498. [PMID: 34204367 PMCID: PMC8234702 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22126498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The constitutive expression or overactivation of cyclooxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (LOX) enzymes results in aberrant metabolism of arachidonic acid and poor prognosis in melanoma. Our aim is to compare the in vitro effects of selective COX-1 (acetylsalicylic acid), COX-2 (meloxicam), 5-LOX (MK-886 and AA-861), 12-LOX (baicalein) and 15-LOX (PD-146176) inhibition in terms of proliferation (SRB assay), mitochondrial viability (MTT assay), caspase 3-7 activity (chemiluminescent assay), 2D antimigratory (scratch assay) and synthesis of eicosanoids (EIA) in the B16F10 cell line (single treatments). We also explore their combinatorial pharmacological space with dacarbazine and temozolomide (median effect method). Overall, our results with single treatments show a superior cytotoxic efficacy of selective LOX inhibitors over selective COX inhibitors against B16F10 cells. PD-146176 caused the strongest antiproliferation effect which was accompanied by cell cycle arrest in G1 phase and an >50-fold increase in caspases 3/7 activity. When the selected inhibitors are combined with the antineoplastic drugs, only meloxicam provides clear synergy, with LOX inhibitors mostly antagonizing. These apparent contradictions between single and combination treatments, together with some paradoxical effects observed in the biosynthesis of eicosanoids after FLAP inhibition in short term incubations, warrant further mechanistical in vitro and in vivo scrutiny.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cullinane C, Waldeck K, Kirby L, Rogers BE, Eu P, Tothill RW, Hicks RJ. Enhancing the anti-tumour activity of 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate radionuclide therapy in somatostatin receptor-2 expressing tumour models by targeting PARP. Sci Rep 2020; 10:10196. [PMID: 32576907 PMCID: PMC7311440 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67199-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an important treatment option for patients with somatostatin receptor-2 (SSTR2)-expressing neuroendocrine tumour (NET) though tumour regression occurs in only a minority of patients. Therefore, novel PRRT regimens with improved therapeutic activity are needed. Radiation induced DNA damage repair is an attractive therapeutic target to increase PRRT efficacy and consequently, we have characterised a panel of preclinical models for their SSTR2 expression, in vivo growth properties and response to 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate (LuTate) PRRT to identify models with features suitable for evaluating novel therapeutic combinations. In vitro studies using the SSTR2 expressing AR42J model demonstrate that the combination of LuTate and the small molecule Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP) inhibitor, talazoparib led to increased DNA double strand breaks, as assessed by γ-H2AX foci formation, as compared to LuTate alone. Furthermore, using the AR42J tumour model in vivo we demonstrate that the combination of LuTate and talazoparib significantly improved the anti-tumour efficacy of LuTate alone. These findings support the clinical evaluation of the combination of LuTate and PARP inhibition in SSTR2-expressing NET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carleen Cullinane
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Kelly Waldeck
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laura Kirby
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Buck E Rogers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Peter Eu
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard W Tothill
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baldwin P, Likhotvorik R, Baig N, Cropper J, Carlson R, Kurmasheva R, Sridhar S. Nanoformulation of Talazoparib Increases Maximum Tolerated Doses in Combination With Temozolomide for Treatment of Ewing Sarcoma. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1416. [PMID: 31921673 PMCID: PMC6928193 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program previously identified the PARP inhibitor talazoparib (TLZ) as a means to potentiate temozolomide (TMZ) activity for the treatment of Ewing sarcoma. However, the combination of TLZ and TMZ has been toxic in both preclinical and clinical testing, necessitating TMZ dose reduction to ~15% of the single agent maximum tolerated dose. We have synthesized a nanoparticle formulation of talazoparib (NanoTLZ) to be administered intravenously in an effort to modulate the toxicity profile of this combination treatment. Results in Ewing sarcoma xenograft models are presented to demonstrate the utility of this delivery method both alone and in combination with TMZ. NanoTLZ reduced gross toxicity and had a higher maximum tolerated dose than oral TLZ. The dose of TMZ did not have to be reduced when combined with NanoTLZ as was required when combined with oral TLZ. This indicated the NanoTLZ delivery system may be advantageous in decreasing the systemic toxicity associated with the combination of oral TLZ and TMZ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paige Baldwin
- Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Nabeela Baig
- Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Jodie Cropper
- Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Ruth Carlson
- Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Raushan Kurmasheva
- Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, United States.,Department of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Srinivas Sridhar
- Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.,Division of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mak DW, Li S, Minchom A. Challenging the recalcitrant disease—developing molecularly driven treatments for small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 2019; 119:132-150. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
8
|
Jahagirdar D, Purohit S, Sharma NK. Combinatorial Use of DNA Ligase Inhibitor L189 and Temozolomide Potentiates Cell Growth Arrest in HeLa. CURRENT CANCER THERAPY REVIEWS 2019. [DOI: 10.2174/1573394714666180216150332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction:
The issues of carcinoma drug resistance to alkylating agents such as Temozolomide
(TMZ) are considered as a major concern in therapeutics. The potential ways to
achieve better cancer cell growth arrest and cytotoxicity have been suggested including the combinatorial
use of DNA repair protein inhibitors and genotoxic drug TMZ. Here, authors assess the
ability of DNA ligase inhibitor (L189) to modulate TMZ mediated HeLa cell growth arrest and
cytotoxicity.
Materials and Methods:
Here, authors have employed Trypan blue dye exclusion and propidium
iodide (PI) using FACS to determine HeLa cell viability after exposure to TMZ with or without
L189 inhibitor. Additionally, authors show the DNA ligase III protein level using ELISA and
fluorescent microscopy to support the observed effects of combinatorial use of TMZ and L189.
Results:
In this paper, data indicate that the addition of L189 produced appreciable decrease in the
growth of HeLa cells. However, combined treatment of L189 and TMZ showed enhanced TMZinduced
HeLa growth arrest possibly in G2/M cell cycle phase without employing cell death
mechanisms.
Conclusions:
These results underscore the combinatorial treatment using TMZ and L189 to bring
desirable cancer cell growth arrest and future molecular study to dissect out the participating
pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devashree Jahagirdar
- Cancer and Translational Research Lab, Dr. D.Y. Patil Biotechnology & Bioinformatics Institute, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, 411033, India
| | - Shruti Purohit
- Cancer and Translational Research Lab, Dr. D.Y. Patil Biotechnology & Bioinformatics Institute, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, 411033, India
| | - Nilesh K. Sharma
- Cancer and Translational Research Lab, Dr. D.Y. Patil Biotechnology & Bioinformatics Institute, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, 411033, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gupta SK, Smith EJ, Mladek AC, Tian S, Decker PA, Kizilbash SH, Kitange GJ, Sarkaria JN. PARP Inhibitors for Sensitization of Alkylation Chemotherapy in Glioblastoma: Impact of Blood-Brain Barrier and Molecular Heterogeneity. Front Oncol 2019; 8:670. [PMID: 30723695 PMCID: PMC6349736 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Prognosis of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains dismal despite maximal surgical resection followed by aggressive chemo-radiation therapy. Almost every GBM, regardless of genotype, relapses as aggressive recurrent disease. Sensitization of GBM cells to chemo-radiation is expected to extend survival of patients with GBM by enhancing treatment efficacy. The PARP family of enzymes has a pleiotropic role in DNA repair and metabolism and has emerged as an attractive target for sensitization of cancer cells to genotoxic therapies. However, despite promising results from a number of preclinical studies, progress of clinical trials involving PARP inhibitors (PARPI) has been slower in GBM as compared to other malignancies. Preclinical in vivo studies have uncovered limitations of PARPI-mediated targeting of base excision repair, considered to be the likely mechanism of sensitization for temozolomide (TMZ)-resistant GBM. Nevertheless, PARPI remain a promising sensitizing approach for at least a subset of GBM tumors that are inherently sensitive to TMZ. Our PDX preclinical trial has helped delineate MGMT promoter hyper-methylation as a biomarker of the PARPI veliparib-mediated sensitization. In clinical trials, MGMT promoter hyper-methylation now is being studied as a potential predictive biomarker not only for response to TMZ therapy alone, but also PARPI-mediated sensitization of TMZ therapy. Besides the combination approach being investigated, IDH1/2 mutant gliomas associated with 2-hydroxygluterate (2HG)-mediated homologous recombination (HR) defect may potentially benefit from PARPI monotherapy. In this article, we discuss existing results and provide additional data in support of potential alternative mechanisms of sensitization that would help identify potential biomarkers for PARPI-based therapeutic approaches to GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiv K Gupta
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Emily J Smith
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Ann C Mladek
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Shulan Tian
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Paul A Decker
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Sani H Kizilbash
- Departments of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Gaspar J Kitange
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Singh R, Mehrotra S, Gopalakrishnan M, Gojo I, Karp JE, Greer JM, Chen A, Piekarz R, Kiesel BF, Gobburu J, Rudek MA, Beumer JH. Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response assessment of veliparib co-administered with temozolomide in patients with myeloid leukemias. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2018; 83:319-328. [PMID: 30456480 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-018-3731-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Veliparib is an oral inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase enzyme. Combination of veliparib and temozolomide was well-tolerated and demonstrated clinical activity in older patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or AML arising from pre-existing myeloid malignancies. We aimed to perform quantitative assessments of pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of veliparib in this patient population to inform future trial design. METHODS Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using Phoenix® NLME with pharmacokinetic data obtained from 37 subjects after oral administration of veliparib in a Phase I study with and without temozolomide. Effect of covariates (age, sex, BMI, creatinine clearance (CLCR), and co-administration of temozolomide) on the pharmacokinetics of veliparib were evaluated, as well as impact of veliparib exposure on mucositis (dose-limiting toxicity), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival. RESULTS A two-compartment model with first-order elimination and a first-order absorption with lag-time adequately described veliparib pharmacokinetics. CLCR and body weight were clinically significant covariates for veliparib disposition. The proportion of subjects with all grade mucositis increased with veliparib exposure (AUC). However, no trend in ORR and overall survival was observed with increasing exposure. CONCLUSIONS Veliparib with temozolomide presents a promising combination for older patients with myeloid leukemias. An exposure-safety relationship was established for this combination. Further clinical investigations aimed at elucidating the veliparib exposure-efficacy/safety relationship and optimizing dosing recommendations for maximizing benefit-risk in patients with advanced myeloid malignancies should study veliparib doses ranging up to 120 mg in combination with temozolomide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renu Singh
- Center for Translational Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shailly Mehrotra
- Center for Translational Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Ivana Gojo
- The Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Judith E Karp
- The Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jacqueline M Greer
- The Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alice Chen
- Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard Piekarz
- Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Jogarao Gobburu
- Center for Translational Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michelle A Rudek
- The Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jan H Beumer
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Identification and preclinical characterization of a novel and potent poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor ZYTP1. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2018; 82:635-647. [DOI: 10.1007/s00280-018-3653-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
12
|
Kizilbash SH, Gupta SK, Chang K, Kawashima R, Parrish KE, Carlson BL, Bakken KK, Mladek AC, Schroeder MA, Decker PA, Kitange GJ, Shen Y, Feng Y, Protter AA, Elmquist WF, Sarkaria JN. Restricted Delivery of Talazoparib Across the Blood-Brain Barrier Limits the Sensitizing Effects of PARP Inhibition on Temozolomide Therapy in Glioblastoma. Mol Cancer Ther 2017; 16:2735-2746. [PMID: 28947502 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-0365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, including talazoparib, potentiate temozolomide efficacy in multiple tumor types; however, talazoparib-mediated sensitization has not been evaluated in orthotopic glioblastoma (GBM) models. This study evaluates talazoparib ± temozolomide in clinically relevant GBM models. Talazoparib at 1-3 nmol/L sensitized T98G, U251, and GBM12 cells to temozolomide, and enhanced DNA damage signaling and G2-M arrest in vitroIn vivo cyclical therapy with talazoparib (0.15 mg/kg twice daily) combined with low-dose temozolomide (5 mg/kg daily) was well tolerated. This talazoparib/temozolomide regimen prolonged tumor stasis more than temozolomide alone in heterotopic GBM12 xenografts [median time to endpoint: 76 days versus 50 days temozolomide (P = 0.005), 11 days placebo (P < 0.001)]. However, talazoparib/temozolomide did not accentuate survival beyond that of temozolomide alone in corresponding orthotopic xenografts [median survival 37 vs. 30 days with temozolomide (P = 0.93), 14 days with placebo, P < 0.001]. Average brain and plasma talazoparib concentrations at 2 hours after a single dose (0.15 mg/kg) were 0.49 ± 0.07 ng/g and 25.5±4.1 ng/mL, respectively. The brain/plasma distribution of talazoparib in Bcrp-/- versus wild-type (WT) mice did not differ, whereas the brain/plasma ratio in Mdr1a/b-/- mice was higher than WT mice (0.23 vs. 0.02, P < 0.001). Consistent with the in vivo brain distribution, overexpression of MDR1 decreased talazoparib accumulation in MDCKII cells. These results indicate that talazoparib has significant MDR1 efflux liability that may restrict delivery across the blood-brain barrier, and this may explain the loss of talazoparib-mediated temozolomide sensitization in orthotopic versus heterotopic GBM xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(12); 2735-46. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shiv K Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kenneth Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ryo Kawashima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Karen E Parrish
- Brain Barriers Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Brett L Carlson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Katrina K Bakken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ann C Mladek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mark A Schroeder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Paul A Decker
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Gaspar J Kitange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Yuqiao Shen
- BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., Novato, California
| | - Ying Feng
- BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., Novato, California
| | | | - William F Elmquist
- Brain Barriers Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Senhaji Mouhri Z, Goodfellow E, Jean-Claude B. A type I combi-targeting approach for the design of molecules with enhanced potency against BRCA1/2 mutant- and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (mgmt)- expressing tumour cells. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:540. [PMID: 28800752 PMCID: PMC5553999 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3504-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mutations of the DNA repair proteins BRCA1/2 are synthetically lethal with the DNA repair enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), which when inhibited, leads to cell death due to the absence of compensatory DNA repair mechanism. The potency of PARP inhibitors has now been clinically proven. However, disappointingly, acquired resistance mediated by the reactivation of wild type BRCA1/2 has been reported. In order to improve their efficacy, trials are ongoing to explore their combinations with temozolomide (TMZ). Here, in order to enhance potency in BRCA1/2-mutant cells, we report on the design of single molecules termed "combi-molecules" capable of not only inhibiting PARP but also damaging DNA like TMZ, which is known to induce a large number of DNA adducts. The majority of these lesions are processed through PARP-dependent base-excision repair machinery. Paradoxically, the least abundant lesion, the O6-methylguanine adduct is the most cytotoxic. Its repair by the O6-methylguanine DNA methyl transferase (MGMT) confers robust resistance to TMZ. Thus, we surmise that a combi-molecule designed to generate the same DNA adducts as TMZ, with an additional ability to block PARP, could induce BRCA1/2 mutant selective potency and a growth inhibitory profile independent of MGMT status. METHODS The hydrolysis of EG22 and its stabilized form ZSM02 was analyzed by HPLC and fluorescence spectroscopy. Growth inhibitory potency was determined by SRB assay. PARP inhibition was determined by an enzyme assay and DNA damage by the comet assay. Subcellular distribution was visualized by confocal microscopy. RESULTS Studies on EG22 showed that: (a) it inflicted anomalously higher levels of DNA damage than TMZ (b) it induced PARP inhibitory potency in the same range as ANI, a known PARP inhibitor (IC50 = 0.10 μM) (c) it showed strong potency in both BRCA1/2 wild type and mutated cells with 6-fold selectivity for the mutants and it was 65-303-fold more potent than TMZ and 4-63-fold than ANI alone and 3-47-fold than their corresponding equimolar combinations and (d) its potency was independent of MGMT expression. CONCLUSION The results in toto suggest that a combi-molecular approach directed at blocking PARP and damaging DNA can lead to single molecules with selective and enhanced potency against BRCA1/2 mutant and with activity independent of MGMT, the major predictive biomarker for resistance to TMZ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhor Senhaji Mouhri
- Cancer Drug Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, McGill University Health Center/Royal Victoria Hospital, 1001 Decarie boul, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Elliot Goodfellow
- Cancer Drug Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, McGill University Health Center/Royal Victoria Hospital, 1001 Decarie boul, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Bertrand Jean-Claude
- Cancer Drug Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, McGill University Health Center/Royal Victoria Hospital, 1001 Decarie boul, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gojo I, Beumer JH, Pratz KW, McDevitt MA, Baer MR, Blackford AL, Smith BD, Gore SD, Carraway HE, Showel MM, Levis MJ, Dezern AE, Gladstone DE, Ji JJ, Wang L, Kinders RJ, Pouquet M, Ali-Walbi I, Rudek MA, Poh W, Herman JG, Karnitz LM, Kaufmann SH, Chen A, Karp JE. A Phase 1 Study of the PARP Inhibitor Veliparib in Combination with Temozolomide in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23:697-706. [PMID: 27503200 PMCID: PMC5290001 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2016] [Revised: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 07/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In preclinical studies, the PARP inhibitor veliparib enhanced the antileukemic action of temozolomide through potentiation of DNA damage. Accordingly, we conducted a phase 1 study of temozolomide with escalating doses of veliparib in patients with relapsed, refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or AML arising from aggressive myeloid malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients received veliparib [20-200 mg once a day on day 1 and twice daily on days 4-12 in cycle 1 (days 1-8 in cycle ≥2)] and temozolomide [150-200 mg/m2 daily on days 3-9 in cycle 1 (days 1-5 in cycle ≥2)] every 28 to 56 days. Veliparib pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics [ability to inhibit poly(ADP-ribose) polymer (PAR) formation and induce H2AX phosphorylation] were assessed. Pretreatment levels of MGMT and PARP1 protein, methylation of the MGMT promoter, and integrity of the Fanconi anemia pathway were also examined. RESULTS Forty-eight patients were treated at seven dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities were oral mucositis and esophagitis lasting >7 days. The MTD was veliparib 150 mg twice daily with temozolomide 200 mg/m2 daily. The complete response (CR) rate was 17% (8/48 patients). Veliparib exposure as well as inhibition of PAR polymer formation increased dose proportionately. A veliparib-induced increase in H2AX phosphorylation in CD34+ cells was observed in responders. Three of 4 patients with MGMT promoter methylation achieved CR. CONCLUSIONS Veliparib plus temozolomide is well tolerated, with activity in advanced AML. Further evaluation of this regimen and of treatment-induced phosphorylation of H2AX and MGMT methylation as potential response predictors appears warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 23(3); 697-706. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivana Gojo
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Jan H Beumer
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Keith W Pratz
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael A McDevitt
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Maria R Baer
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Amanda L Blackford
- Department of Statistics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - B Douglas Smith
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Steven D Gore
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hetty E Carraway
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Margaret M Showel
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mark J Levis
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Amy E Dezern
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Douglas E Gladstone
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jiuping Jay Ji
- Laboratory of Human Toxicology and Pharmacology, Applied/Developmental Research Support Directorate, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., NCI-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland
| | - Lihua Wang
- Laboratory of Human Toxicology and Pharmacology, Applied/Developmental Research Support Directorate, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., NCI-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland
| | - Robert J Kinders
- Laboratory of Human Toxicology and Pharmacology, Applied/Developmental Research Support Directorate, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., NCI-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland
| | - Marie Pouquet
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ismail Ali-Walbi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michelle A Rudek
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Weijie Poh
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - James G Herman
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Larry M Karnitz
- Division of Oncology Research and Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Scott H Kaufmann
- Division of Oncology Research and Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Alice Chen
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, NCI, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Judith E Karp
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Somnay Y, Lubner S, Gill H, Matsumura JB, Chen H. The PARP inhibitor ABT-888 potentiates dacarbazine-induced cell death in carcinoids. Cancer Gene Ther 2016; 23:348-354. [PMID: 27632933 PMCID: PMC5083201 DOI: 10.1038/cgt.2016.39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2016] [Accepted: 08/12/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Monoagent DNA-alkylating chemotherapies like dacarbazine are among a paucity of medical treatments for advanced carcinoid tumors, but are limited by host toxicity and intrinsic chemoresistance through the base excision repair (BER) pathway via poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Hence, inhibitors of PARP may potentiate DNA-damaging agents by blocking BER and DNA restoration. We show that the PARP inhibitor ABT-888 (Veliparib) enhances the cytotoxic effects of dacarbazine in carcinoids. Two human carcinoid cell lines (BON and H727) treated with a combination of ABT-888 and dacarbazine resulted in synergistic growth inhibition signified by combination indices <1 on the Chou-Talalay scale. ABT-888 administered prior to varying dacarbazine doses promoted the suppression of neuroendocrine biomarkers of malignancy ASCL1 and CgA, shown by Western analysis. ATM phosphorylation and p21Waf1/Cip1 activation, indicative of DNA damage, were increased by ABT-888 when combined with dacarbazine treatment, suggesting BER pathway attenuation by ABT-888. PE Annexin V/7-AAD staining and sorting revealed a profound induction of apoptosis following combination treatment, which was further confirmed by increased PARP cleavage. These results demonstrate that ABT-888 synergizes dacarbazine treatment in carcinoids. Therefore, ABT-888 may help treat carcinoids unresponsive or refractory to mainstay therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Somnay
- Endocrine Surgery Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - S Lubner
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - H Gill
- Endocrine Surgery Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - J B Matsumura
- Endocrine Surgery Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - H Chen
- Endocrine Surgery Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Alabama- Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lok BH, Gardner EE, Schneeberger VE, Ni A, Desmeules P, Rekhtman N, de Stanchina E, Teicher BA, Riaz N, Powell SN, Poirier JT, Rudin CM. PARP Inhibitor Activity Correlates with SLFN11 Expression and Demonstrates Synergy with Temozolomide in Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 23:523-535. [PMID: 27440269 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-1040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2016] [Revised: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are a novel class of small molecule therapeutics for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Identification of predictors of response would advance our understanding, and guide clinical application, of this therapeutic strategy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Efficacy of PARP inhibitors olaparib, rucaparib, and veliparib, as well as etoposide and cisplatin in SCLC cell lines, and gene expression correlates, was analyzed using public datasets. HRD genomic scar scores were calculated from Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays. In vitro talazoparib efficacy was measured by cell viability assays. For functional studies, CRISPR/Cas9 and shRNA were used for genomic editing and transcript knockdown, respectively. Protein levels were assessed by immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Quantitative synergy of talazoparib and temozolomide was determined in vitro In vivo efficacy of talazoparib, temozolomide, and the combination was assessed in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. RESULTS We identified SLFN11, but not HRD genomic scars, as a consistent correlate of response to all three PARPi assessed, with loss of SLFN11 conferring resistance to PARPi. We confirmed these findings in vivo across multiple PDX and defined IHC staining for SLFN11 as a predictor of talazoparib response. As temozolomide has activity in SCLC, we investigated combination therapy with talazoparib and found marked synergy in vitro and efficacy in vivo, which did not solely depend on SLFN11 or MGMT status. CONCLUSIONS SLFN11 is a relevant predictive biomarker of sensitivity to PARP inhibitor monotherapy in SCLC and we identify combinatorial therapy with TMZ as a particularly promising therapeutic strategy that warrants further clinical investigation. Clin Cancer Res; 23(2); 523-35. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin H Lok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric E Gardner
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Pharmacology Graduate Training Program, Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Andy Ni
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Patrice Desmeules
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Natasha Rekhtman
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elisa de Stanchina
- Anti-Tumor Assessment Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Beverly A Teicher
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Simon N Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - John T Poirier
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. .,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Charles M Rudin
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. .,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ekhteiari Salmas R, Unlu A, Bektaş M, Yurtsever M, Mestanoglu M, Durdagi S. Virtual screening of small molecules databases for discovery of novel PARP-1 inhibitors: combination of in silico and in vitro studies. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2016; 35:1899-1915. [DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2016.1199328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ayhan Unlu
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biophysics, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Muhammet Bektaş
- Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biophysics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mine Yurtsever
- Department of Chemistry, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Serdar Durdagi
- Department of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gupta SK, Kizilbash SH, Carlson BL, Mladek AC, Boakye-Agyeman F, Bakken KK, Pokorny JL, Schroeder MA, Decker PA, Cen L, Eckel-Passow JE, Sarkar G, Ballman KV, Reid JM, Jenkins RB, Verhaak RG, Sulman EP, Kitange GJ, Sarkaria JN. Delineation of MGMT Hypermethylation as a Biomarker for Veliparib-Mediated Temozolomide-Sensitizing Therapy of Glioblastoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108:djv369. [PMID: 26615020 PMCID: PMC4862419 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2015] [Revised: 09/23/2015] [Accepted: 10/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sensitizing effects of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors have been studied in several preclinical models, but a clear understanding of predictive biomarkers is lacking. In this study, in vivo efficacy of veliparib combined with temozolomide (TMZ) was evaluated in a large panel of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and potential biomarkers were analyzed. METHODS The efficacy of TMZ alone vs TMZ/veliparib was compared in a panel of 28 GBM PDX lines grown as orthotopic xenografts (8-10 mice per group); all tests of statistical significance were two-sided. DNA damage was analyzed by γH2AX immunostaining and promoter methylation of DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-approved methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS The combination of TMZ/veliparib statistically significantly extended survival of GBM models (P < .05 by log-rank) compared with TMZ alone in five of 20 MGMT-hypermethylated lines (average extension in median survival = 87 days, range = 20-150 days), while the combination was ineffective in six MGMT-unmethylated lines. In the MGMT promoter-hypermethylated GBM12 line (median survival with TMZ+veliparib = 189 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 59 to 289 days, vs TMZ alone = 98 days, 95% CI = 49 to 210 days, P = .04), the profound TMZ-sensitizing effect of veliparib was lost when MGMT was overexpressed (median survival with TMZ+veliparib = 36 days, 95% CI = 28 to 38 days, vs TMZ alone = 35 days, 95% CI = 32 to 37 days, P = .87), and a similar association was observed in two nearly isogenic GBM28 sublines with an intact vs deleted MGMT locus. In comparing DNA damage signaling after dosing with veliparib/TMZ or TMZ alone, increased phosphorylation of damage-responsive proteins (KAP1, Chk1, Chk2, and H2AX) was observed only in MGMT promoter-hypermethylated lines. CONCLUSION Veliparib statistically significantly enhances (P < .001) the efficacy of TMZ in tumors with MGMT promoter hypermethylation. Based on these data, MGMT promoter hypermethylation is being used as an eligibility criterion for A071102 (NCT02152982), the phase II/III clinical trial evaluating TMZ/veliparib combination in patients with GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiv K Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Sani H Kizilbash
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Brett L Carlson
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Ann C Mladek
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Felix Boakye-Agyeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Katrina K Bakken
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Jenny L Pokorny
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Mark A Schroeder
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Paul A Decker
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Ling Cen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Jeanette E Eckel-Passow
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Gobinda Sarkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Karla V Ballman
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Joel M Reid
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Robert B Jenkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Roeland G Verhaak
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Gaspar J Kitange
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS)
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology (SKG, BLC, ACM, KKB, JLP, MAS, LC, GJK, JNS), Division of Medical Oncology (SHK), Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (FBA, JMR), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (PAD, JEEP, KVB), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (GS, RBJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN; The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (RGV, EPS).
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kan C, Zhang J. BRCA1 Mutation: A Predictive Marker for Radiation Therapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 93:281-93. [PMID: 26383678 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.05.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2015] [Revised: 05/08/2015] [Accepted: 05/21/2015] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
DNA repair, in particular, DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, is essential for the survival of both normal and cancer cells. An elaborate repair mechanism has been developed in cells to efficiently repair the damaged DNA. The pathways predominately involved in DSB repair are homologous recombination and classic nonhomologous end-joining, although the alternative NHEJ pathway, a third DSB repair pathway, could also be important in certain contexts. The protein of BRCA1 encoded by the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 regulates all DSB repair pathways. Given that DSBs represent the most biologically significant lesions induced by ionizing radiation and that impaired DSB repair leads to radiation sensitivity, it has been expected that cancer patients with BRCA1 mutations should benefit from radiation therapy. However, the clinical data have been conflicting and inconclusive. We provide an overview about the current status of the data regarding BRCA1 deficiency and radiation therapy sensitivity in both experimental models and clinical investigations. In addition, we discuss a strategy to potentiate the effects of radiation therapy by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, the pharmacologic drugs being investigated as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with BRCA1/2 mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlene Kan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Junran Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ko JC, Wang TJ, Chang PY, Syu JJ, Chen JC, Chen CY, Jian YT, Jian YJ, Zheng HY, Chen WC, Lin YW. Minocycline enhances mitomycin C-induced cytotoxicity through down-regulating ERK1/2-mediated Rad51 expression in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol 2015. [PMID: 26212550 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2015.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Minocycline is a semisynthetic tetracycline derivative; it has anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer effects distinct from its antimicrobial function. However, the molecular mechanism of minocycline-induced cytotoxicity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells has not been identified. Rad51 plays a central role in homologous recombination and high levels of Rad51 expression are observed in chemo- or radioresistant carcinomas. Our previous studies have shown that the MKK1/2-ERK1/2 signal pathway maintains the expression of Rad51 in NSCLC cells. In this study, minocycline treatment inhibited cell viability and proliferation of two NSCLC cells, A549 and H1975. Treatment with minocycline decreased Rad51 mRNA and protein levels through MKK1/2-ERK1/2 inactivation. Furthermore, expression of constitutively active MKK1 (MKK1-CA) vectors significantly rescued the decreased Rad51 protein and mRNA levels in minocycline-treated NSCLC cells. However, combined treatment with MKK1/2 inhibitor U0126 and minocycline further decreased the Rad51 expression and cell viability of NSCLC cells. Knocking down Rad51 expression by transfection with small interfering RNA of Rad51 enhanced the cytotoxicity and cell growth inhibition of minocycline. Mitomycin C (MMC) is typically used as a first or second line regimen to treat NSCLC. Compared to a single agent alone, MMC combined with minocycline resulted in cytotoxicity and cell growth inhibition synergistically in NSCLC cells, accompanied with reduced activation of phospho-ERK1/2, and reduced Rad51 protein levels. Overexpression of MKK1-CA or Flag-tagged Rad51 could reverse the minocycline and MMC-induced synergistic cytotoxicity. These findings may have implications for the rational design of future drug regimens incorporating minocycline and MMC for the treatment of NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jen-Chung Ko
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Taiwan, Department of Nursing, Yuanpei University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Jing Wang
- Department of Biochemical Science and Technology, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Po-Yuan Chang
- Department of Biochemical Science and Technology, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Jhan-Jhang Syu
- Department of Biochemical Science and Technology, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Jyh-Cheng Chen
- Department of Food Science, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Yu Chen
- Department of Biochemical Science and Technology, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Yun-Ting Jian
- Department of Biochemical Science and Technology, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Jun Jian
- Department of Biochemical Science and Technology, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Hao-Yu Zheng
- Department of Biochemical Science and Technology, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Ching Chen
- Department of Biochemical Science and Technology, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Yun-Wei Lin
- Department of Biochemical Science and Technology, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bridges KA, Toniatti C, Buser CA, Liu H, Buchholz TA, Meyn RE. Niraparib (MK-4827), a novel poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibitor, radiosensitizes human lung and breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 2015; 5:5076-86. [PMID: 24970803 PMCID: PMC4148123 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.2083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess niraparib (MK-4827), a novel poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, for its ability to radiosensitize human tumor cells. Human tumor cells derived from lung, breast and prostate cancers were tested for radiosensitization by niraparib using clonogenic survival assays. Both p53 wild-type and p53-defective lines were included. The ability of niraparib to alter the repair of radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) was determined using detection of γ-H2AX foci and RAD51 foci. Clonogenic survival analyses indicated that micromolar concentrations of niraparib radiosensitized tumor cell lines derived from lung, breast, and prostate cancers independently of their p53 status but not cell lines derived from normal tissues. Niraparib also sensitized tumor cells to H2O2 and converted H2O2-induced single strand breaks (SSBs) into DSBs during DNA replication. These results indicate that human tumor cells are significantly radiosensitized by the potent and selective PARP-1 inhibitor, niraparib, in the in vitro setting. The mechanism of this effect appears to involve a conversion of sublethal SSBs into lethal DSBs during DNA replication due to the inhibition of base excision repair by the drug. Taken together, our findings strongly support the clinical evaluation of niraparib in combination with radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen A Bridges
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - Huifeng Liu
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas A Buchholz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Raymond E Meyn
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Znojek P, Willmore E, Curtin NJ. Preferential potentiation of topoisomerase I poison cytotoxicity by PARP inhibition in S phase. Br J Cancer 2014; 111:1319-26. [PMID: 25003660 PMCID: PMC4183837 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2014] [Revised: 05/27/2014] [Accepted: 06/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Topoisomerase I (Topo I) poisons (e.g., camptothecin (CPT)), used to treat cancer, cause DNA breaks that are most cytotoxic during S phase. PARP-1 promotes DNA repair and PARP inhibitors (PARPi) sensitise cells to Topo I poisons. We aimed to determine whether chemosensitisation is also S phase specific using rucaparib, a potent PARPi in advanced clinical evaluation. METHODS The impact of rucaparib, on CPT-induced cytotoxicity was measured in human colon cancer (LoVo) and leukaemic (K562) cells in asynchronous and cell cycle phase-separated cultures. Topoisomerase I and PARP levels and activity and the effect of rucaparib on DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs), double-strand breaks (DSBs) and collapsed replication fork induction and repair were determined in cell cycle phase-separated cells. RESULTS The cytotoxicity of CPT was greatest during S phase, partially attributable to high Topo I activity, and rucaparib preferentially sensitised S-phase cells. Rucaparib increased CPT-induced DNA SSBs in all phases of the cell cycle, and increased DSB and γH2AX foci in S and G2, with γH2AX foci being highest in S-phase cells. Repair of SSBs and DSBs was most rapid during S then G2 phases and was substantially hindered by rucaparib. CONCLUSIONS Rucaparib preferentially sensitises S-phase cells by increasing the frequency of collapsed replication forks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Znojek
- Newcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Paul O'Gorman Building, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
| | - E Willmore
- Newcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Paul O'Gorman Building, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
| | - N J Curtin
- Newcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Paul O'Gorman Building, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gupta SK, Mladek AC, Carlson BL, Boakye-Agyeman F, Bakken KK, Kizilbash SH, Schroeder MA, Reid J, Sarkaria JN. Discordant in vitro and in vivo chemopotentiating effects of the PARP inhibitor veliparib in temozolomide-sensitive versus -resistant glioblastoma multiforme xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20:3730-41. [PMID: 24838527 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-3446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Effective sensitizing strategies potentially can extend the benefit of temozolomide (TMZ) therapy in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). We previously demonstrated that robust TMZ-sensitizing effects of the [poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase] (PARP) inhibitor veliparib (ABT-888) are restricted to TMZ-sensitive GBM xenografts. The focus of this study is to provide an understanding for the differential sensitization in paired TMZ-sensitive and -resistant GBM models. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN The impact of veliparib on TMZ-induced cytotoxicity and DNA damage was evaluated in vitro and in vivo in models of acquired TMZ resistance (GBM12TMZ-mgmt(High), GBM12TMZ-mgmt(Low), and U251TMZ), inherent TMZ resistance (T98G), and TMZ-sensitive (U251 and GBM12). In vivo drug efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were analyzed using clinically relevant dosing regimens. RESULTS Veliparib enhanced TMZ cytotoxicity and DNA-damage signaling in all GBM models in vitro with more pronounced effects in TMZ-resistant lines at 3 to 10 μmol/L veliparib. In vivo, combined TMZ/veliparib, compared with TMZ alone, significantly delayed tumor growth and enhanced DNA-damage signaling and γH2AX levels in the sensitive GBM12 xenograft line but not in the resistant GBM12TMZ lines. The pharmacokinetic profile of veliparib was similar for GBM12 and GBM12TMZ tumors with Cmax (∼1.5 μmol/L) in tissue significantly lower than concentrations associated with optimal in vitro sensitizing effects for resistant tumors. In contrast, robust suppression of PARP-1 expression by shRNA significantly increased TMZ sensitivity of U251TMZ in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS In vitro cytotoxicity assays do not adequately model the therapeutic index of PARP inhibitors, as concentrations of veliparib and TMZ required to sensitize TMZ-resistant cancer cells in vivo cannot be achieved using a tolerable dosing regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiv K Gupta
- Authors' Affiliations: Departments of Radiation Oncology, and
| | - Ann C Mladek
- Authors' Affiliations: Departments of Radiation Oncology, and
| | - Brett L Carlson
- Authors' Affiliations: Departments of Radiation Oncology, and
| | - Felix Boakye-Agyeman
- Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota
| | | | | | | | - Joel Reid
- Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Authors' Affiliations: Departments of Radiation Oncology, and
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
McMullin RP, Wittner BS, Yang C, Denton-Schneider BR, Hicks D, Singavarapu R, Moulis S, Lee J, Akbari MR, Narod SA, Aldape KD, Steeg PS, Ramaswamy S, Sgroi DC. A BRCA1 deficient-like signature is enriched in breast cancer brain metastases and predicts DNA damage-induced poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor sensitivity. Breast Cancer Res 2014; 16:R25. [PMID: 24625110 PMCID: PMC4053087 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2013] [Accepted: 02/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is an unmet clinical need for biomarkers to identify breast cancer patients at an increased risk of developing brain metastases. The objective is to identify gene signatures and biological pathways associated with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) brain metastasis. METHODS We combined laser capture microdissection and gene expression microarrays to analyze malignant epithelium from HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases with that from HER2+ nonmetastatic primary tumors. Differential gene expression was performed including gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using publicly available breast cancer gene expression data sets. RESULTS In a cohort of HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases, we identified a gene expression signature that anti-correlates with overexpression of BRCA1. Sequence analysis of the HER2+ brain metastases revealed no pathogenic mutations of BRCA1, and therefore the aforementioned signature was designated BRCA1 Deficient-Like (BD-L). Evaluation of an independent cohort of breast cancer metastases demonstrated that BD-L values are significantly higher in brain metastases as compared to other metastatic sites. Although the BD-L signature is present in all subtypes of breast cancer, it is significantly higher in BRCA1 mutant primary tumors as compared with sporadic breast tumors. Additionally, BD-L signature values are significantly higher in HER2-/ER- primary tumors as compared with HER2+/ER + and HER2-/ER + tumors. The BD-L signature correlates with breast cancer cell line pharmacologic response to a combination of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor and temozolomide, and the signature outperformed four published gene signatures of BRCA1/2 deficiency. CONCLUSIONS A BD-L signature is enriched in HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases without pathogenic BRCA1 mutations. Unexpectedly, elevated BD-L values are found in a subset of primary tumors across all breast cancer subtypes. Evaluation of pharmacological sensitivity in breast cancer cell lines representing all breast cancer subtypes suggests the BD-L signature may serve as a biomarker to identify sporadic breast cancer patients who might benefit from a therapeutic combination of PARP inhibitor and temozolomide and may be indicative of a dysfunctional BRCA1-associated pathway.
Collapse
|
26
|
Bailey ML, O'Neil NJ, van Pel DM, Solomon DA, Waldman T, Hieter P. Glioblastoma cells containing mutations in the cohesin component STAG2 are sensitive to PARP inhibition. Mol Cancer Ther 2014; 13:724-32. [PMID: 24356817 PMCID: PMC4130349 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-13-0749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Recent data have identified STAG2, a core subunit of the multifunctional cohesin complex, as a highly recurrently mutated gene in several types of cancer. We sought to identify a therapeutic strategy to selectively target cancer cells harboring inactivating mutations of STAG2 using two independent pairs of isogenic glioblastoma cell lines containing either an endogenous mutant STAG2 allele or a wild-type STAG2 allele restored by homologous recombination. We find that mutations in STAG2 are associated with significantly increased sensitivity to inhibitors of the DNA repair enzyme PARP. STAG2-mutated, PARP-inhibited cells accumulated in G2 phase and had a higher percentage of micronuclei, fragmented nuclei, and chromatin bridges compared with wild-type STAG2 cells. We also observed more 53BP1 foci in STAG2-mutated glioblastoma cells, suggesting that these cells have defects in DNA repair. Furthermore, cells with mutations in STAG2 were more sensitive than cells with wild-type STAG2 when PARP inhibitors were used in combination with DNA-damaging agents. These data suggest that PARP is a potential target for tumors harboring inactivating mutations in STAG2, and strongly recommend that STAG2 status be determined and correlated with therapeutic response to PARP inhibitors, both prospectively and retrospectively, in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie L Bailey
- Corresponding Author: Philip Hieter, Michael Smith Laboratories, 2185 East Mall, Room 323, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T1Z4.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
O’Sullivan CC, Moon DH, Kohn EC, Lee JM. Beyond Breast and Ovarian Cancers: PARP Inhibitors for BRCA Mutation-Associated and BRCA-Like Solid Tumors. Front Oncol 2014; 4:42. [PMID: 24616882 PMCID: PMC3937815 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2013] [Accepted: 02/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have shown clinical activity in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm)-associated breast and ovarian cancers. Accumulating evidence suggests that PARPi may have a wider application in the treatment of cancers defective in DNA damage repair pathways, such as prostate, lung, endometrial, and pancreatic cancers. Several PARPi are currently in phase I/II clinical investigation, as single-agents and/or combination therapy in these solid tumors. Understanding more about the molecular abnormalities involved in BRCA-like phenotype in solid tumors beyond breast and ovarian cancers, exploring novel therapeutic trial strategies and drug combinations, and defining potential predictive biomarkers are critical to expanding the scope of PARPi therapy. This will improve clinical outcome in advanced solid tumors. Here, we briefly review the preclinical data and clinical development of PARPi, and discuss its future development in solid tumors beyond gBRCAm-associated breast and ovarian cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciara C. O’Sullivan
- Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dominic H. Moon
- Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Medical Research Scholars Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Elise C. Kohn
- Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jung-Min Lee
- Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Curtin NJ. Inhibiting the DNA damage response as a therapeutic manoeuvre in cancer. Br J Pharmacol 2014; 169:1745-65. [PMID: 23682925 DOI: 10.1111/bph.12244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2013] [Accepted: 03/20/2013] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED The DNA damage response (DDR), consisting of an orchestrated network of proteins effecting repair and signalling to cell cycle arrest, to allow time to repair, is essential for cell viability and to prevent DNA damage being passed on to daughter cells. The DDR is dysregulated in cancer with some pathways up-regulated and others down-regulated or lost. Up-regulated pathways can confer resistance to anti-cancer DNA damaging agents. Therefore, inhibitors of key components of these pathways have the potential to prevent this therapeutic resistance. Conversely, defects in a particular DDR pathway may lead to dependence on a complementary pathway. Inhibition of this complementary pathway may result in tumour-specific cell killing. Thus, inhibitors of the DDR have the potential to increase the efficacy of DNA damaging chemotherapy and radiotherapy and have single-agent activity against tumours with a specific DDR defect. This review describes the compounds that have been designed to inhibit specific DDR targets and summarizes the pre-clinical and clinical evaluation of these inhibitors of DNA damage signalling and repair. LINKED ARTICLES This article is part of a themed section on Emerging Therapeutic Aspects in Oncology. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2013.169.issue-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N J Curtin
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Novel PARP-1 inhibitors based on a 2-propanoyl-3H-quinazolin-4-one scaffold. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2014; 24:462-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.12.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2013] [Revised: 12/10/2013] [Accepted: 12/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
30
|
Curtin N, Szabo C. Therapeutic applications of PARP inhibitors: anticancer therapy and beyond. Mol Aspects Med 2013; 34:1217-56. [PMID: 23370117 PMCID: PMC3657315 DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2013.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 279] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2012] [Revised: 01/12/2013] [Accepted: 01/18/2013] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this article is to describe the current and potential clinical translation of pharmacological inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) for the therapy of various diseases. The first section of the present review summarizes the available preclinical and clinical data with PARP inhibitors in various forms of cancer. In this context, the role of PARP in single-strand DNA break repair is relevant, leading to replication-associated lesions that cannot be repaired if homologous recombination repair (HRR) is defective, and the synthetic lethality of PARP inhibitors in HRR-defective cancer. HRR defects are classically associated with BRCA1 and 2 mutations associated with familial breast and ovarian cancer, but there may be many other causes of HRR defects. Thus, PARP inhibitors may be the drugs of choice for BRCA mutant breast and ovarian cancers, and extend beyond these tumors if appropriate biomarkers can be developed to identify HRR defects. Multiple lines of preclinical data demonstrate that PARP inhibition increases cytotoxicity and tumor growth delay in combination with temozolomide, topoisomerase inhibitors and ionizing radiation. Both single agent and combination clinical trials are underway. The final part of the first section of the present review summarizes the current status of the various PARP inhibitors that are in various stages of clinical development. The second section of the present review summarizes the role of PARP in selected non-oncologic indications. In a number of severe, acute diseases (such as stroke, neurotrauma, circulatory shock and acute myocardial infarction) the clinical translatability of PARP inhibition is supported by multiple lines of preclinical data, as well as observational data demonstrating PARP activation in human tissue samples. In these disease indications, PARP overactivation due to oxidative and nitrative stress drives cell necrosis and pro-inflammatory gene expression, which contributes to disease pathology. Accordingly, multiple lines of preclinical data indicate the efficacy of PARP inhibitors to preserve viable tissue and to down-regulate inflammatory responses. As the clinical trials with PARP inhibitors in various forms of cancer progress, it is hoped that a second line of clinical investigations, aimed at testing of PARP inhibitors for various non-oncologic indications, will be initiated, as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Curtin
- Department of Experimental Cancer Therapy, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Csaba Szabo
- Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
PARP is an important protein in DNA repair pathways especially the base excision repair (BER). BER is involved in DNA repair of single strand breaks (SSBs). If BER is impaired, inhibiting poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), SSBs accumulate and become double stand breaks (DSBs). The cells with increasing number of DSBs become more dependent on other repair pathways, mainly the homologous recombination (HR) and the nonhomologous end joining. Patients with defective HR, like BRCA-deficient cell lines, are even more susceptible to impairment of the BER pathway. Inhibitors of PARP preferentially kill cancer cells in BRCA-mutation cancer cell lines over normal cells. Also, PARP inhibitors increase cytotoxicity by inhibiting repair in the presence of chemotherapies that induces SSBs. These two principles have been tested clinically. Over the last few years, excitement over this class of agents has escalated due to reported activity as single agent in BRCA1- or BRCA2-associated ovarian or breast cancers, and in combination with chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer. This review covers the current results of clinical trials testing those two principles. It also evaluates future directions for the field of PARP inhibitor development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Barazzuol L, Jena R, Burnet NG, Meira LB, Jeynes JCG, Kirkby KJ, Kirkby NF. Evaluation of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor ABT-888 combined with radiotherapy and temozolomide in glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8:65. [PMID: 23510353 PMCID: PMC3622565 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2012] [Accepted: 03/12/2013] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The cytotoxicity of radiotherapy and chemotherapy can be enhanced by modulating DNA repair. PARP is a family of enzymes required for an efficient base-excision repair of DNA single-strand breaks and inhibition of PARP can prevent the repair of these lesions. The current study investigates the trimodal combination of ABT-888, a potent inhibitor of PARP1-2, ionizing radiation and temozolomide(TMZ)-based chemotherapy in glioblastoma (GBM) cells. METHODS Four human GBM cell lines were treated for 5 h with 5 μM ABT-888 before being exposed to X-rays concurrently with TMZ at doses of 5 or 10 μM for 2 h. ABT-888's PARP inhibition was measured using immunodetection of poly(ADP-ribose) (pADPr). Cell survival and the different cell death pathways were examined via clonogenic assay and morphological characterization of the cell and cell nucleus. RESULTS Combining ABT-888 with radiation yielded enhanced cell killing in all four cell lines, as demonstrated by a sensitizer enhancement ratio at 50% survival (SER50) ranging between 1.12 and 1.37. Radio- and chemo-sensitization was further enhanced when ABT-888 was combined with both X-rays and TMZ in the O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT)-methylated cell lines with a SER50 up to 1.44. This effect was also measured in one of the MGMT-unmethylated cell lines with a SER50 value of 1.30. Apoptosis induction by ABT-888, TMZ and X-rays was also considered and the effect of ABT-888 on the number of apoptotic cells was noticeable at later time points. In addition, this work showed that ABT-888 mediated sensitization is replication dependent, thus demonstrating that this effect might be more pronounced in tumour cells in which endogenous replication lesions are present in a larger proportion than in normal cells. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that ABT-888 has the clinical potential to enhance the current standard treatment for GBM, in combination with conventional chemo-radiotherapy. Interestingly, our results suggest that the use of PARP inhibitors might be clinically significant in those patients whose tumour is MGMT-unmethylated and currently derive less benefit from TMZ.
Collapse
|
33
|
Lovato A, Panasci L, Witcher M. Is there an epigenetic component underlying the resistance of triple-negative breast cancers to parp inhibitors? Front Pharmacol 2013; 3:202. [PMID: 23293602 PMCID: PMC3530734 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2012.00202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2012] [Accepted: 12/06/2012] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (Parp) is an enzyme responsible for catalyzing post-translational modifications through the addition of poly(ADP-ribose) chains (known as PARylation). Modification by PARylation modulates numerous cellular processes including transcription, chromatin remodeling, apoptosis, and DNA damage repair. In particular, the role of Parp activation in response to DNA damage has been intensely studied. Tumors bearing mutations of the breast cancer susceptibility genes, Brca1/2, are prone to DNA breakages whose restoration into functional double-strand DNA is Parp dependent. This concept has been exploited therapeutically in Brca mutated breast and ovarian tumors, where acute sensitivity to Parp inhibitors is observed. Based on in vitro and clinical studies it remains unclear to what extent Parp inhibitors can be utilized beyond treating Brca mutated tumors. This review will focus on the often overlooked roles of PARylation in chromatin remodeling, epigenetics, and transcription to explain why some cancers may be unresponsive to Parp inhibition. We predict that understanding the impact of PARylation on gene expression will lead to alternative approaches to manipulate the Parp pathway for therapeutic benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Lovato
- The Departments of Oncology and Experimental Medicine, The Lady Davis Institute and Segal Cancer Centre of the Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Montreal QC, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ashwell S. Strategies towards more effective anticancer therapies: targeting DNA damage response pathways. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2012; 3:103-15. [PMID: 22111536 DOI: 10.1586/ecp.09.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The last decade has seen a tremendous increase in the understanding of the cellular mechanisms that underlie the detection and repair of DNA damage. This gave rise to the hypothesis that inhibition of DNA repair may result in increased efficacy of existing therapies and, more recently, to the idea that some tumor cells may carry additional defects that make them hypersensitive to DNA repair inhibitors as single agents. In order to minimize the potential to cause lesions in normal tissue, strategies have been directed to specific targets or pathways where selectivity for tumor over normal tissue is possible, thus to date most emphasis has been placed on a relatively small number of targets such as the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and the checkpoint kinases. Both of these approaches have yielded small molecule inhibitors that are currently in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Ashwell
- AstraZeneca R&D Boston, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Waltham, MA 02451, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Solier S, Zhang YW, Ballestrero A, Pommier Y, Zoppoli G. DNA damage response pathways and cell cycle checkpoints in colorectal cancer: current concepts and future perspectives for targeted treatment. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2012; 12:356-71. [PMID: 22385513 DOI: 10.2174/156800912800190901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2011] [Revised: 07/05/2011] [Accepted: 12/22/2011] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Although several drugs have been designed in the last few years to target specific key pathways and functions in colorectal cancer (CRC), the backbone of CRC treatment is still made up of compounds which rely on DNA damage to accomplish their role. DNA damage response (DDR) and checkpoint pathways are intertwined signaling networks that arrest cell cycle, recognize and repair genetic mistakes which arise during DNA replication and transcription, as well as through the exposure to chemical and physical agents that interact with nucleic acids. The good but highly variable activity of DNA damaging agents in the treatment of CRC suggests that intrinsic alterations in DDR pathways and cell cycle checkpoints may contribute differentially to the way cancer cells react to DNA damage. In the present review, our aim is to depict the recent advances in understanding the molecular basis of the activity of DNA damaging agents used for the treatment of CRC. We focus on the known and potential drug targets that are part of these complex and intertwined pathways. We describe the potential role of the checkpoints in CRC, and how their pharmacological manipulation could lead to chemopotentiation or synergism with currently used drugs. Novel therapeutic agents playing a role in DDR and checkpoint inhibition are assessed. We discuss the possible rationale for combining PARP inhibition with DNA damaging agents, and we address the link between DDR and EGFR pathways in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Solier
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (MD), USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Pietanza MC, Rudin CM. Novel therapeutic approaches for small cell lung cancer: the future has arrived. Curr Probl Cancer 2012; 36:156-73. [PMID: 22495056 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2012.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
38
|
Kedar PS, Stefanick DF, Horton JK, Wilson SH. Increased PARP-1 association with DNA in alkylation damaged, PARP-inhibited mouse fibroblasts. Mol Cancer Res 2012; 10:360-8. [PMID: 22246237 DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-11-0477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of base excision repair-proficient mouse fibroblasts with the DNA alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and a small molecule inhibitor of PARP-1 results in a striking cell killing phenotype, as previously reported. Earlier studies showed that the mechanism of cell death is apoptosis and requires DNA replication, expression of PARP-1, and an intact S-phase checkpoint cell signaling system. It is proposed that activity-inhibited PARP-1 becomes immobilized at DNA repair intermediates, and that this blocks DNA repair and interferes with DNA replication, eventually promoting an S-phase checkpoint and G(2)-M block. Here we report studies designed to evaluate the prediction that inhibited PARP-1 remains DNA associated in cells undergoing repair of alkylation-induced damage. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation with anti-PARP-1 antibody and qPCR for DNA quantification, a higher level of DNA was found associated with PARP-1 in cells treated with MMS plus PARP inhibitor than in cells without inhibitor treatment. These results have implications for explaining the extreme hypersensitivity phenotype after combination treatment with MMS and a PARP inhibitor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Padmini S Kedar
- Laboratory of Structural Biology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, 111 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pietanza MC, Kadota K, Huberman K, Sima CS, Fiore JJ, Sumner DK, Travis WD, Heguy A, Ginsberg MS, Holodny AI, Chan TA, Rizvi NA, Azzoli CG, Riely GJ, Kris MG, Krug LM. Phase II Trial of Temozolomide in Patients with Relapsed Sensitive or Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer, with Assessment of Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase as a Potential Biomarker. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18:1138-45. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-2059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
40
|
Checkpoint signaling, base excision repair, and PARP promote survival of colon cancer cells treated with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine but not 5-fluorouracil. PLoS One 2011; 6:e28862. [PMID: 22194930 PMCID: PMC3240632 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2011] [Accepted: 11/16/2011] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The fluoropyrimidines 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and FdUrd (5-fluorodeoxyuridine; floxuridine) are the backbone of chemotherapy regimens for colon cancer and other tumors. Despite their widespread use, it remains unclear how these agents kill tumor cells. Here, we have analyzed the checkpoint and DNA repair pathways that affect colon tumor responses to 5-FU and FdUrd. These studies demonstrate that both FdUrd and 5-FU activate the ATR and ATM checkpoint signaling pathways, indicating that they cause genotoxic damage. Notably, however, depletion of ATM or ATR does not sensitize colon cancer cells to 5-FU, whereas these checkpoint pathways promote the survival of cells treated with FdUrd, suggesting that FdUrd exerts cytotoxicity by disrupting DNA replication and/or inducing DNA damage, whereas 5-FU does not. We also found that disabling the base excision (BER) repair pathway by depleting XRCC1 or APE1 sensitized colon cancer cells to FdUrd but not 5-FU. Consistent with a role for the BER pathway, we show that small molecule poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 (PARP) inhibitors, AZD2281 and ABT-888, remarkably sensitized both mismatch repair (MMR)-proficient and -deficient colon cancer cell lines to FdUrd but not to 5-FU. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the roles of genotoxin-induced checkpoint signaling and DNA repair differ significantly for these agents and also suggest a novel approach to colon cancer therapy in which FdUrd is combined with a small molecule PARP inhibitor.
Collapse
|
41
|
Nguyen D, Zajac-Kaye M, Rubinstein L, Voeller D, Tomaszewski JE, Kummar S, Chen AP, Pommier Y, Doroshow JH, Yang SX. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition enhances p53-dependent and -independent DNA damage responses induced by DNA damaging agent. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:4074-82. [PMID: 22101337 DOI: 10.4161/cc.10.23.18170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Targeting DNA repair with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has shown a broad range of anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced malignancies with and without BRCA deficiency. It remains unclear what role p53 plays in response to PARP inhibition in BRCA-proficient cancer cells treated with DNA damaging agents. Using gene expression microarray analysis, we find that DNA damage response (DDR) pathways elicited by veliparib (ABT-888), a PARP inhibitor, plus topotecan comprise the G1/S checkpoint, ATM, and p53 signaling pathways in p53-wildtype cancer cell lines and BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATR pathway in p53-mutant lines. In contrast, topotecan alone induces the G1/S checkpoint pathway in p53-wildtype lines and not in p53-mutant cells. These responses are coupled with G2/G1 checkpoint effectors p21(CDKN1A) upregulation, and Chk1 and Chk2 activation. The drug combination enhances G2 cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and a marked increase in cell death relative to topotecan alone in p53-wildtype and p53-mutant or -null cells. We also show that the checkpoint kinase inhibitor UCN-01 abolishes the G2 arrest induced by the veliparib and topotecan combination and further increases cell death in both p53-wildtype and -mutant cells. Collectively, PARP inhibition by veliparib enhances DDR and cell death in BRCA-proficient cancer cells in a p53-dependent and -independent fashion. Abrogating the cell-cycle arrest induced by PARP inhibition plus chemotherapeutics may be a strategy in the treatment of BRCA-proficient cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Nguyen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Liu X, Shi Y, Maag DX, Palma JP, Patterson MJ, Ellis PA, Surber BW, Ready DB, Soni NB, Ladror US, Xu AJ, Iyer R, Harlan JE, Solomon LR, Donawho CK, Penning TD, Johnson EF, Shoemaker AR. Iniparib Nonselectively Modifies Cysteine-Containing Proteins in Tumor Cells and Is Not a Bona Fide PARP Inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 18:510-23. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-1973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
43
|
Brenner JC, Ateeq B, Li Y, Yocum AK, Cao Q, Asangani IA, Patel S, Wang X, Liang H, Yu J, Palanisamy N, Siddiqui J, Yan W, Cao X, Mehra R, Sabolch A, Basrur V, Lonigro RJ, Yang J, Tomlins SA, Maher CA, Elenitoba-Johnson KS, Hussain M, Navone NM, Pienta KJ, Varambally S, Feng FY, Chinnaiyan AM. Mechanistic rationale for inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in ETS gene fusion-positive prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 2011; 19:664-78. [PMID: 21575865 PMCID: PMC3113473 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 346] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2010] [Revised: 03/02/2011] [Accepted: 04/19/2011] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Recurrent fusions of ETS genes are considered driving mutations in a diverse array of cancers, including Ewing's sarcoma, acute myeloid leukemia, and prostate cancer. We investigate the mechanisms by which ETS fusions mediate their effects, and find that the product of the predominant ETS gene fusion, TMPRSS2:ERG, interacts in a DNA-independent manner with the enzyme poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) and the catalytic subunit of DNA protein kinase (DNA-PKcs). ETS gene-mediated transcription and cell invasion require PARP1 and DNA-PKcs expression and activity. Importantly, pharmacological inhibition of PARP1 inhibits ETS-positive, but not ETS-negative, prostate cancer xenograft growth. Finally, overexpression of the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion induces DNA damage, which is potentiated by PARP1 inhibition in a manner similar to that of BRCA1/2 deficiency.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Animals
- Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology
- Catalytic Domain
- Cell Line, Tumor
- Cell Movement
- Chick Embryo
- Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
- DNA Damage
- DNA-Activated Protein Kinase/metabolism
- Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Gene Fusion
- Genes, Reporter
- HEK293 Cells
- Humans
- Male
- Mass Spectrometry
- Mice
- Mice, Inbred BALB C
- Mice, Nude
- Mice, SCID
- Models, Molecular
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/chemistry
- Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics
- Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/metabolism
- Phthalazines/pharmacology
- Piperazines/pharmacology
- Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1
- Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
- Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases/genetics
- Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases/metabolism
- Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Prostatic Neoplasms/enzymology
- Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics
- Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology
- Protein Conformation
- RNA Interference
- Recombinant Fusion Proteins/metabolism
- Time Factors
- Transcriptional Activation
- Transfection
- Tumor Burden
- Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Chad Brenner
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Bushra Ateeq
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Yong Li
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Anastasia K. Yocum
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Qi Cao
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Irfan A. Asangani
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Sonam Patel
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Xiaoju Wang
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Hallie Liang
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Jindan Yu
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Nallasivam Palanisamy
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Javed Siddiqui
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Wei Yan
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Xuhong Cao
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Rohit Mehra
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Aaron Sabolch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Venkatesha Basrur
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Robert J. Lonigro
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Jun Yang
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, and David H. Koch Center for Applied Research of Genitourinary Cancers, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Scott A Tomlins
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Christopher A. Maher
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Center for Computational Medicine and Biology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Kojo S.J. Elenitoba-Johnson
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Maha Hussain
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Nora M. Navone
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, and David H. Koch Center for Applied Research of Genitourinary Cancers, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kenneth J. Pienta
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Sooryanarayana Varambally
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Felix Y. Feng
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Arul M. Chinnaiyan
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan 1400 E. Medical Center Drive, 5316 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Corresponding author. Tel.: + 734 615-4062, (A.Chinnaiyan), URL: http://www.pathology.med.umich.edu/dynamo/chinnaiyan/index.jsp
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Han W, Li X, Fu X. The macro domain protein family: structure, functions, and their potential therapeutic implications. Mutat Res 2011; 727:86-103. [PMID: 21421074 PMCID: PMC7110529 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2011.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2010] [Revised: 03/08/2011] [Accepted: 03/09/2011] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Macro domains are ancient, highly evolutionarily conserved domains that are widely distributed throughout all kingdoms of life. The 'macro fold' is roughly 25kDa in size and is composed of a mixed α-β fold with similarity to the P loop-containing nucleotide triphosphate hydrolases. They function as binding modules for metabolites of NAD(+), including poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR), which is synthesized by PAR polymerases (PARPs). Although there is a high degree of sequence similarity within this family, particularly for residues that might be involved in catalysis or substrates binding, it is likely that the sequence variation that does exist among macro domains is responsible for the specificity of function of individual proteins. Recent findings have indicated that macro domain proteins are functionally promiscuous and are implicated in the regulation of diverse biological functions, such as DNA repair, chromatin remodeling and transcriptional regulation. Significant advances in the field of macro domain have occurred in the past few years, including biological insights and the discovery of novel signaling pathways. To provide a framework for understanding these recent findings, this review will provide a comprehensive overview of the known and proposed biochemical, cellular and physiological roles of the macro domain family. Recent data that indicate a critical role of macro domain regulation for the proper progression of cellular differentiation programs will be discussed. In addition, the effect of dysregulated expression of macro domain proteins will be considered in the processes of tumorigenesis and bacterial pathogenesis. Finally, a series of observations will be highlighted that should be addressed in future efforts to develop macro domains as effective therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Key Words
- adpr, adp-ribose
- aplf, aprataxin pnk-like factor
- bares, bacterial-produce adp-ribosylating exotoxins
- marts, mono-adp-ribosyltransferases
- ar, androgen receptor
- ber, base excision repair
- bcl2, b cell lymphoma 2
- coast6, collaborator of stat6
- chfr, checkpoint protein with fha and ring domain
- cbp, creb-binding protein
- chip, chromatin immunoprecipitation
- dsbs, dna double-stranded breaks
- 3d, three-dimensional
- dt, diphtheria toxin
- erα, estrogen receptor α
- eta, exotoxin a
- emt, epithelial–mesenchymal transition
- itc, isothermal titration calorimetry
- iaps, inhibitors of apoptosis
- ks, kabuki syndrome
- msci, meiotic sex chromosome inactivation
- nf-κb, nuclear factor-kappab
- oaadpr, o-acetyl-adp-ribose
- par, poly(adp-ribose)
- parps, par polymerases
- parg, par glycohydrolase
- parylation, poly(adp-ribosyl)ation
- parbms, par binding motifs
- ptms, posttranslational modifications
- pbz, par binding zinc finger
- rnap ii, rna polymerase ii
- stat6, signal transducer and activator of transcription-6
- sfv, semliki forest virus
- ssbr, single-strand break repair
- sts, staurosporine
- tnf, tumor necrosis factor
- trf1, telomeric repeat binding factor-1
- macro domain family
- structural feature
- posttranslational modifications
- biological function
- disease association
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weidong Han
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 10 6693 7463; fax: +86 10 6693 7516.
| | | | - Xiaobing Fu
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 10 6898 9955; fax: +86 10 6898 9955.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Calvert H, Azzariti A. The clinical development of inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Ann Oncol 2011; 22 Suppl 1:i53-9. [PMID: 21285153 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A number of inhibitors of DNA repair have been evaluated or are undergoing development as potential cancer treatments. Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) are of particular interest in treating hereditary breast cancers occurring in patients who are carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. In vitro PARP inhibitors are highly cytotoxic to cell lines carrying BRCA mutations while only minimally toxic to cell lines without these mutations. This is thought to be due to a phenomenon known as synthetic lethality where the accumulation of single-strand breaks consequent on PARP inhibition are converted to double-strand breaks on cell division. Cancer cells in BRCA carriers are uniquely unable to repair the consequent double-strand breaks that result during cell division. PARP inhibitors were initially developed as possible chemo-potentiating agents but have now been evaluated clinically in BRCA-related tumors, showing remarkable single-agent activity. The potential future development and use is reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Calvert
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Tang JB, Svilar D, Trivedi RN, Wang XH, Goellner EM, Moore B, Hamilton RL, Banze LA, Brown AR, Sobol RW. N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase and DNA polymerase beta modulate BER inhibitor potentiation of glioma cells to temozolomide. Neuro Oncol 2011; 13:471-86. [PMID: 21377995 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nor011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Temozolomide (TMZ) is the preferred chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of glioma following surgical resection and/or radiation. Resistance to TMZ is attributed to efficient repair and/or tolerance of TMZ-induced DNA lesions. The majority of the TMZ-induced DNA base adducts are repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathway and therefore modulation of this pathway can enhance drug sensitivity. N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase (MPG) initiates BER by removing TMZ-induced N3-methyladenine and N7-methylguanine base lesions, leaving abasic sites (AP sites) in DNA for further processing by BER. Using the human glioma cell lines LN428 and T98G, we report here that potentiation of TMZ via BER inhibition [methoxyamine (MX), the PARP inhibitors PJ34 and ABT-888 or depletion (knockdown) of PARG] is greatly enhanced by over-expression of the BER initiating enzyme MPG. We also show that methoxyamine-induced potentiation of TMZ in MPG expressing glioma cells is abrogated by elevated-expression of the rate-limiting BER enzyme DNA polymerase β (Polβ), suggesting that cells proficient for BER readily repair AP sites in the presence of MX. Further, depletion of Polβ increases PARP inhibitor-induced potentiation in the MPG over-expressing glioma cells, suggesting that expression of Polβ modulates the cytotoxic effect of combining increased repair initiation and BER inhibition. This study demonstrates that MPG overexpression, together with inhibition of BER, sensitizes glioma cells to the alkylating agent TMZ in a Polβ-dependent manner, suggesting that the expression level of both MPG and Polβ might be used to predict the effectiveness of MX and PARP-mediated potentiation of TMZ in cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiang-bo Tang
- Department of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
- Marcie K Weil
- Division of Cancer Development and Therapeutics, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20892, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mangerich A, Bürkle A. How to kill tumor cells with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Int J Cancer 2010; 128:251-65. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2010] [Accepted: 08/19/2010] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
49
|
Efimova EV, Mauceri HJ, Golden DW, Labay E, Bindokas VP, Darga TE, Chakraborty C, Barreto-Andrade JC, Crawley C, Sutton HG, Kron SJ, Weichselbaum RR. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor induces accelerated senescence in irradiated breast cancer cells and tumors. Cancer Res 2010; 70:6277-82. [PMID: 20610628 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-4224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Persistent DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) may determine the antitumor effects of ionizing radiation (IR) by inducing apoptosis, necrosis, mitotic catastrophe, or permanent growth arrest. IR induces rapid modification of megabase chromatin domains surrounding DSBs via poly-ADP-ribosylation, phosphorylation, acetylation, and protein assembly. The dynamics of these IR-induced foci (IRIF) have been implicated in DNA damage signaling and DNA repair. As an IRIF reporter, we tracked the relocalization of green fluorescent protein fused to a chromatin binding domain of the checkpoint adapter protein 53BP1 after IR of breast cancer cells and tumors. To block DSB repair in breast cancer cells and tumors, we targeted poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) with ABT-888 (veliparib), one of several PARP inhibitors currently in clinical trials. PARP inhibition markedly enhanced IRIF persistence and increased breast cancer cell senescence both in vitro and in vivo, arguing for targeting IRIF resolution as a novel therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena V Efimova
- Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Löser DA, Shibata A, Shibata AK, Woodbine LJ, Jeggo PA, Chalmers AJ. Sensitization to radiation and alkylating agents by inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is enhanced in cells deficient in DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cancer Ther 2010; 9:1775-87. [PMID: 20530711 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-09-1027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
As single agents, chemical inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) are nontoxic and have clinical efficacy against BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient tumors. PARP inhibitors also enhance the cytotoxicity of ionizing radiation and alkylating agents but will only improve clinical outcomes if tumor sensitization exceeds effects on normal tissues. It is unclear how tumor DNA repair proficiency affects the degree of sensitization. We have previously shown that the radiosensitizing effect of PARP inhibition requires DNA replication and will therefore affect rapidly proliferating tumors more than normal tissues. Because many tumors exhibit defective DNA repair, we investigated the impact of double-strand break (DSB) repair integrity on the sensitizing effects of the PARP inhibitor olaparib. Sensitization to ionizing radiation and the alkylating agent methylmethane sulfonate was enhanced in DSB repair-deficient cells. In Artemis(-/-) and ATM(-/-) mouse embryo fibroblasts, sensitization was replication dependent and associated with defective repair of replication-associated damage. Radiosensitization of Ligase IV(-/-) mouse embryo fibroblasts was independent of DNA replication and is explained by inhibition of "alternative" end joining. After methylmethane sulfonate treatment, PARP inhibition promoted replication-independent accumulation of DSB, repair of which required Ligase IV. Our findings predict that the sensitizing effects of PARP inhibitors will be more pronounced in rapidly dividing and/or DNA repair defective tumors than normal tissues and show their potential to enhance the therapeutic ratio achieved by conventional DNA-damaging agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana A Löser
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|