1
|
Verrelle P, Gestraud P, Poyer F, Soria A, Tessier S, Lescure A, Anthony E, Corbé M, Heinrich S, Beauvineau C, Chaput L, Granzhan A, Piguel S, Perez F, Teulade-Fichou MP, Megnin-Chanet F, Del Nery E. Integrated High-Throughput Screening and Large-Scale Isobolographic Analysis to Accelerate the Discovery of Radiosensitizers With Greater Selectivity for Cancer Cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1294-1307. [PMID: 37778425 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE High-throughput screening (HTS) platforms have been widely used to identify candidate anticancer drugs and drug-drug combinations; however, HTS-based identification of new drug-ionizing radiation (IR) combinations has rarely been reported. Herein, we developed an integrated approach including cell-based HTS and computational large-scale isobolographic analysis to accelerate the identification of radiosensitizing compounds acting strongly and more specifically on cancer cells. METHODS AND MATERIALS In a 384-well plate format, 160 compounds likely to interfere with the cell response to radiation were screened on human glioblastoma (U251-MG) and cervix carcinoma (ME-180) cell lines, as well as on normal fibroblasts (CCD-19Lu). After drug exposure, cells were irradiated or not and short-term cell survival was assessed by high-throughput cell microscopy. Computational large-scale dose-response and isobolographic approach were used to identify promising synergistic drugs radiosensitizing cancer cells rather than normal cells. Synergy of a promising compound was confirmed on ME-180 cells by an independent 96-well assay protocol, and finally, by the gold-standard colony forming assay. RESULTS We retained 4 compounds synergistic at 2 isoeffects in U251-MG and ME-180 cell lines and 11 compounds synergistically effective in only one cancer cell line. Among these 15 promising radiosensitizers, 5 compounds showed limited toxicity combined or not with IR on normal fibroblasts. CONCLUSIONS Overall, this study demonstrated that HTS chemoradiation screening together with large-scale computational analysis is an efficient tool to identify synergistic drug-IR combinations, with concomitant assessment of unwanted toxicity on normal fibroblasts. It sparks expectations to accelerate the discovery of highly desired agents improving the therapeutic index of radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Verrelle
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie Hospital, Paris, France; Chemistry and Modelisation for the Biology of Cancer, CNRS UMR9187, INSERM U1196, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France.
| | - Pierre Gestraud
- Chemistry and Modelisation for the Biology of Cancer, CNRS UMR9187, INSERM U1196, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Florent Poyer
- Chemistry and Modelisation for the Biology of Cancer, CNRS UMR9187, INSERM U1196, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Adèle Soria
- Biophenics High-Content Screening Laboratory, Department of Translational Research, PSL Research University, PICT-IBiSa, Institut Curie Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Sarah Tessier
- Biophenics High-Content Screening Laboratory, Department of Translational Research, PSL Research University, PICT-IBiSa, Institut Curie Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Aurianne Lescure
- Biophenics High-Content Screening Laboratory, Department of Translational Research, PSL Research University, PICT-IBiSa, Institut Curie Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Elodie Anthony
- Biophenics High-Content Screening Laboratory, Department of Translational Research, PSL Research University, PICT-IBiSa, Institut Curie Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Corbé
- Biophenics High-Content Screening Laboratory, Department of Translational Research, PSL Research University, PICT-IBiSa, Institut Curie Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Heinrich
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform (RadeXp), Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Orsay, France; Inserm U1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Institut Curie, Paris Saclay University
| | - Claire Beauvineau
- Bioinformatics and Computational Systems Biology of Cancer, PSL Research University, Mines Paris Tech, INSERM U900, Paris, France
| | - Ludovic Chaput
- Bioinformatics and Computational Systems Biology of Cancer, PSL Research University, Mines Paris Tech, INSERM U900, Paris, France
| | - Anton Granzhan
- Bioinformatics and Computational Systems Biology of Cancer, PSL Research University, Mines Paris Tech, INSERM U900, Paris, France
| | - Sandrine Piguel
- Bioinformatics and Computational Systems Biology of Cancer, PSL Research University, Mines Paris Tech, INSERM U900, Paris, France; BioCIS UMR8076, Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Pharmacie, Orsay, France
| | - Franck Perez
- Biophenics High-Content Screening Laboratory, Department of Translational Research, PSL Research University, PICT-IBiSa, Institut Curie Research Center, Paris, France; Cell Biology and Cancer UMR144, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Paule Teulade-Fichou
- Chemistry and Modelisation for the Biology of Cancer, CNRS UMR9187, INSERM U1196, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Frédérique Megnin-Chanet
- Bioinformatics and Computational Systems Biology of Cancer, PSL Research University, Mines Paris Tech, INSERM U900, Paris, France
| | - Elaine Del Nery
- Biophenics High-Content Screening Laboratory, Department of Translational Research, PSL Research University, PICT-IBiSa, Institut Curie Research Center, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bouges E, Segers C, Leys N, Lebeer S, Zhang J, Mastroleo F. Human Intestinal Organoids and Microphysiological Systems for Modeling Radiotoxicity and Assessing Radioprotective Agents. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5859. [PMID: 38136404 PMCID: PMC10741417 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a commonly employed treatment for colorectal cancer, yet its radiotoxicity-related impact on healthy tissues raises significant health concerns. This highlights the need to use radioprotective agents to mitigate these side effects. This review presents the current landscape of human translational radiobiology, outlining the limitations of existing models and proposing engineering solutions. We delve into radiotherapy principles, encompassing mechanisms of radiation-induced cell death and its influence on normal and cancerous colorectal cells. Furthermore, we explore the engineering aspects of microphysiological systems to represent radiotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity and how to include the gut microbiota to study its role in treatment failure and success. This review ultimately highlights the main challenges and future pathways in translational research for pelvic radiotherapy-induced toxicity. This is achieved by developing a humanized in vitro model that mimics radiotherapy treatment conditions. An in vitro model should provide in-depth analyses of host-gut microbiota interactions and a deeper understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms of radioprotective food supplements. Additionally, it would be of great value if these models could produce high-throughput data using patient-derived samples to address the lack of human representability to complete clinical trials and improve patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eloïse Bouges
- RadioPharma Research, Nuclear Medical Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium; (E.B.); (C.S.); (N.L.)
- Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium;
- Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Charlotte Segers
- RadioPharma Research, Nuclear Medical Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium; (E.B.); (C.S.); (N.L.)
| | - Natalie Leys
- RadioPharma Research, Nuclear Medical Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium; (E.B.); (C.S.); (N.L.)
| | - Sarah Lebeer
- Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium;
| | - Jianbo Zhang
- Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, 1105 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Felice Mastroleo
- RadioPharma Research, Nuclear Medical Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium; (E.B.); (C.S.); (N.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xiang J, Ma L, Tong J, Zuo N, Hu W, Luo Y, Liu J, Liang T, Ren Q, Liu Q. Boron-peptide conjugates with angiopep-2 for boron neutron capture therapy. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1199881. [PMID: 37324130 PMCID: PMC10267362 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1199881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) induces intracellular nuclear reaction to destroy cancer cells during thermal neutron irradiation. To selectively eliminate cancer cells but avoid harmful effects on normal tissues, novel boron-peptide conjugates with angiopep-2, namely ANG-B, were constructed and evaluated in preclinical settings. Boron-peptide conjugates were synthesized using solid-phase peptide synthesis, and the molecular mass was validated by mass spectrometry afterwards. Boron concentrations in 6 cancer cell lines and an intracranial glioma mouse model after treatments were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). Phenylalanine (BPA) was tested in parallel for comparison. In vitro treatment with boron delivery peptides significantly increased boron uptake in cancer cells. BNCT with 5 mM ANG-B caused 86.5% ± 5.3% of clonogenic cell death, while BPA at the same concentration caused 73.3% ± 6.0% clonogenic cell death. The in vivo effect of ANG-B in an intracranial glioma mouse model was evaluated by PET/CT imaging at 31 days after BNCT. The mouse glioma tumours in the ANG-B-treated group were shrunk by 62.9% on average, while the BPA-treated tumours shrank by only 23.0%. Therefore, ANG-B is an efficient boron delivery agent, which has low cytotoxicity and high tumour-to-blood ratio. Based on these experimental results, we expected that ANG-B may leverage BNCT performance in clinical applications in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Xiang
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China
| | - Lin Ma
- Department of Stomatology, General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Jianfei Tong
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China
- Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Dongguan, China
| | - Nan Zuo
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
- Department of Stomatology, The First Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Weitao Hu
- School of Stomatology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yupeng Luo
- School of Stomatology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Junqi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Tianjiao Liang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China
- Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Dongguan, China
| | - Qiushi Ren
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Qi Liu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
- International Cancer Center, Shenzhen University School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gomes NP, Frederick B, Jacobsen JR, Chapnick D, Su TT. A High Throughput Screen with a Clonogenic Endpoint to Identify Radiation Modulators of Cancer. Radiat Res 2023; 199:132-147. [PMID: 36583948 PMCID: PMC10000021 DOI: 10.1667/rade-22-00086.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Clonogenic assays evaluate the ability of single cells to proliferate and form colonies. This process approximates the regrowth and recurrence of tumors after treatment with radiation or chemotherapy, and thereby provides a drug discovery platform for compounds that block this process. However, because of their labor-intensive and cumbersome nature, adapting canonical clonogenic assays for high throughput screening (HTS) has been challenging. We overcame these barriers by developing an integrated system that automates cell- and liquid-handling, irradiation, dosimetry, drug administration, and incubation. Further, we developed a fluorescent live-cell based automated colony scoring methodology that identifies and counts colonies precisely based upon actual nuclei number rather than colony area, thereby eliminating errors in colony counts caused by radiation induced changes in colony morphology. We identified 13 cell lines from 7 cancer types, where radiation is a standard treatment module, that exhibit identical radiation and chemoradiation response regardless of well format and are amenable to miniaturization into small-well HTS formats. We performed pilot screens through a 1,584 compound NCI Diversity Set library using two cell lines representing different cancer indications. Radiation modulators identified in the pilot screens were validated in traditional clonogenic assays, providing proof-of-concept for the screen. The integrated methodology, hereafter "clonogenic HTS", exhibits excellent robustness (Z' values > 0.5) and shows high reproducibility (>95%). We propose that clonogenic HTS we developed can function as a drug discovery platform to identify compounds that inhibit tumor regrowth following radiation therapy, to identify new efficacious pair-wise combinations of known oncologic therapies, or to identify novel modulators ofapproved therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Tin Tin Su
- SuviCa, Inc., Boulder, Colorado 80307-3131
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado, 80309-0347
- Molecular and Cellular Oncology Program, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado 80045
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang Y, Li Y, Sheng Z, Deng W, Yuan H, Wang S, Liu Y. Advances of Patient-Derived Organoids in Personalized Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:888416. [PMID: 35574360 PMCID: PMC9102799 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.888416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-derived organoids (PDO), based on the advanced three-dimensional (3D) culture technology, can provide more relevant physiological and pathological cancer models, which is especially beneficial for developing and optimizing cancer therapeutic strategies. Radiotherapy (RT) is a cornerstone of curative and palliative cancer treatment, which can be performed alone or integrated with surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy in clinical care. Among all cancer therapies, RT has great local control, safety and effectiveness, and is also cost-effective per life-year gained for patients. It has been reported that combing RT with chemotherapy or immunotherapy or radiosensitizer drugs may enhance treatment efficacy at faster rates and lower cost. However, very few FDA-approved combinations of RT with drugs or radiosensitizers exist due to the lack of accurate and relevant preclinical models. Meanwhile, radiation dose escalation may increase treatment efficacy and induce more toxicity of normal tissue as well, which has been studied by conducting various clinical trials, very expensive and time-consuming, often burdensome on patients and sometimes with controversial results. The surged PDO technology may help with the preclinical test of RT combination and radiation dose escalation to promote precision radiation oncology, where PDO can recapitulate individual patient’ tumor heterogeneity, retain characteristics of the original tumor, and predict treatment response. This review aims to introduce recent advances in the PDO technology and personalized radiotherapy, highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the PDO cancer models, and finally examine the existing RT-related PDO trials or applications to harness personalized and precision radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuenan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- *Correspondence: Yuenan Wang, ; Yajie Liu, ; Shubin Wang,
| | - Ye Li
- Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zonghai Sheng
- Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Weiwei Deng
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hongyan Yuan
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Shubin Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- *Correspondence: Yuenan Wang, ; Yajie Liu, ; Shubin Wang,
| | - Yajie Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- *Correspondence: Yuenan Wang, ; Yajie Liu, ; Shubin Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xiang J, Ma L, Gu Z, Jin H, Zhai H, Tong J, Liang T, Li J, Ren Q, Liu Q. A Boronated Derivative of Temozolomide Showing Enhanced Efficacy in Boron Neutron Capture Therapy of Glioblastoma. Cells 2022; 11:cells11071173. [PMID: 35406737 PMCID: PMC8998031 DOI: 10.3390/cells11071173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
There is an incontestable need for improved treatment modality for glioblastoma due to its extraordinary resistance to traditional chemoradiation therapy. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) may play a role in the future. We designed and synthesized a 10B-boronated derivative of temozolomide, TMZB. BNCT was carried out with a total neutron radiation fluence of 2.4 ± 0.3 × 1011 n/cm2. The effects of TMZB in BNCT were measured with a clonogenic cell survival assay in vitro and PET/CT imaging in vivo. Then, 10B-boronated phenylalanine (BPA) was tested in parallel with TMZB for comparison. The IC50 of TMZB for the cytotoxicity of clonogenic cells in HS683 was 0.208 mM, which is comparable to the IC50 of temozolomide at 0.213 mM. In BNCT treatment, 0.243 mM TMZB caused 91.2% ± 6.4% of clonogenic cell death, while 0.239 mM BPA eliminated 63.7% ± 6.3% of clonogenic cells. TMZB had a tumor-to-normal brain ratio of 2.9 ± 1.1 and a tumor-to-blood ratio of 3.8 ± 0.2 in a mouse glioblastoma model. BNCT with TMZB in this model caused 58.2% tumor shrinkage at 31 days after neutron irradiation, while the number for BPA was 35.2%. Therefore, by combining the effects of chemotherapy from temozolomide and radiotherapy with heavy charged particles from BNCT, TMZB-based BNCT exhibited promising potential for therapeutic applications in glioblastoma treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Xiang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
- Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen 518132, China;
| | - Lin Ma
- Department of Stomatology, General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China;
| | - Zheng Gu
- Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen 518132, China;
| | - Hongjun Jin
- Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Biomedical Imaging, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China;
| | - Hongbin Zhai
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China;
| | - Jianfei Tong
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, China; (J.T.); (T.L.); (J.L.)
- Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Dongguan 523803, China
| | - Tianjiao Liang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, China; (J.T.); (T.L.); (J.L.)
- Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Dongguan 523803, China
| | - Juan Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, China; (J.T.); (T.L.); (J.L.)
- Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Dongguan 523803, China
| | - Qiushi Ren
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
- Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen 518132, China;
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China;
- Correspondence: (Q.R.); (Q.L.); Tel.: +86-0755-26038837 (Q.R. & Q.L.)
| | - Qi Liu
- Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen 518132, China;
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China;
- Correspondence: (Q.R.); (Q.L.); Tel.: +86-0755-26038837 (Q.R. & Q.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fluvastatin sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells toward radiation therapy and suppresses radiation- and/or TGF-β-induced tumor-associated fibrosis. J Transl Med 2022; 102:298-311. [PMID: 34773069 DOI: 10.1038/s41374-021-00690-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is highly resistant to chemo and radiotherapy. Radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) is a major cause of clinical concern for various malignancies, including PC. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the radiosensitizing and anti-RIF potential of fluvastatin in PC. Short-term viability and clonogenic survival assays were used to evaluate the radiosensitizing potential of fluvastatin in multiple human and murine PC cell lines. The expression of different proteins was analyzed to understand the mechanisms of fluvastatin-mediated radiosensitization of PC cells and its anti-RIF effects in both mouse and human pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs). Finally, these effects of fluvastatin and/or radiation were assessed in an immune-competent syngeneic murine model of PC. Fluvastatin radiosensitized multiple PC cell lines, as well as radioresistant cell lines in vitro, by inhibiting radiation-induced DNA damage repair response. Nonmalignant cells, such as PSCs and NIH3T3 cells, were less sensitive to fluvastatin-mediated radiosensitization than PC cells. Interestingly, fluvastatin suppressed radiation and/or TGF-β-induced activation of PSCs, as well as the fibrogenic properties of these cells in vitro. Fluvastatin considerably augmented the antitumor effect of external radiation therapy and also suppressed intra-tumor RIF in vivo. These findings suggested that along with radiation, fluvastatin co-treatment may be a potential therapeutic approach against PC.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ye R, Qiao Y, Singh PK, Wang Y, He J, Li N, Krishnan S, Lin SH. High-Content Clonogenic Survival Screen to Identify Chemoradiation Sensitizers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:e27-e37. [PMID: 34348174 PMCID: PMC9986843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy with radiation therapy (CRT) has resulted in significant improvements in clinical outcomes for patients with many locally advanced unresectable cancers. Only a small proportion of patients achieve pathologic complete responses to CRT; combination of CRT with targeted agents offers the promise of further improving treatment responses. However, numerous clinical trials have failed to show an improvement in clinical outcomes with the addition of targeted agents. To increase the accessibility of our screening method and accelerate the pace at which novel combinations with CRT are identified and incorporated into standard practices for treatments, we report details on screening method optimization, data generation, and downstream data analysis. METHODS In part, the gap in translation to large, expensive, and ultimately unsuccessful clinical trials reflects the shortcomings of inconsistently designed, executed, and reported preclinical data on which these studies are based. In an effort to standardize the selection of agents for future clinical testing, we have designed, optimized and validated a high throughput, high content, clonogenic assay platform for step-wise progression of preclinical studies from in vitro to in vivo in non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. RESULTS This highly stable in vitro method was standardized for identification of the most promising CTEP drugs that could best be combined with CRT from among as screen of multiple agents tested in an unbiased manner using 96-well plates. The methodology lends itself to seamless testing of multiple agents in a similar fashion allowing cross-comparisons, evaluation of CRT, or radiation therapy alone, and testing multiple concentrations of test agents sequenced at different times before and after radiation. The method identified Trametinib as a strong CRT sensitizer in KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell lines. This platform has enabled the screening and identification of several chemoradiation sensitizers. CONCLUSIONS High throughput, high content clonogenic drug screening assay allows for the rapid identification of targets and agents to be translated to the clinic to help improve the effectiveness of current standard of care CRT in various solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Graduate School of Biological Sciences, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yawei Qiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Pankaj K. Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Yifan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jianzhong He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Nan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Steven H. Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Graduate School of Biological Sciences, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Elbanna M, Chowdhury NN, Rhome R, Fishel ML. Clinical and Preclinical Outcomes of Combining Targeted Therapy With Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:749496. [PMID: 34733787 PMCID: PMC8558533 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.749496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In the era of precision medicine, radiation medicine is currently focused on the precise delivery of highly conformal radiation treatments. However, the tremendous developments in targeted therapy are yet to fulfill their full promise and arguably have the potential to dramatically enhance the radiation therapeutic ratio. The increased ability to molecularly profile tumors both at diagnosis and at relapse and the co-incident progress in the field of radiogenomics could potentially pave the way for a more personalized approach to radiation treatment in contrast to the current ‘‘one size fits all’’ paradigm. Few clinical trials to date have shown an improved clinical outcome when combining targeted agents with radiation therapy, however, most have failed to show benefit, which is arguably due to limited preclinical data. Several key molecular pathways could theoretically enhance therapeutic effect of radiation when rationally targeted either by directly enhancing tumor cell kill or indirectly through the abscopal effect of radiation when combined with novel immunotherapies. The timing of combining molecular targeted therapy with radiation is also important to determine and could greatly affect the outcome depending on which pathway is being inhibited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- May Elbanna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.,Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Nayela N Chowdhury
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Ryan Rhome
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.,Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Melissa L Fishel
- Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.,Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.,Department of Pediatrics and Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Singh J, Hatcher S, Ku AA, Ding Z, Feng FY, Sharma RA, Pfister SX. Model Selection for the Preclinical Development of New Drug-Radiotherapy Combinations. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:694-704. [PMID: 34474951 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays an essential role in the treatment of more than half of all patients with cancer. In recent decades, advances in devices that deliver radiation and the development of treatment planning software have helped radiotherapy attain precise tumour targeting with minimal toxicity to surrounding tissues. Simultaneously, as more targeted drug therapies are being brought into the market, there has been significant interest in improving cure rates for cancer by adding drugs to radiotherapy to widen the therapeutic window, the difference between normal tissue toxicity and treatment efficacy. The development of new combination therapies will require judicious adaptation of preclinical models that are routinely used for traditional drug discovery. Here we highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each of these preclinical models and discuss how they can be used optimally to identify new and clinically beneficial drug-radiotherapy combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Singh
- Global Translational Science, Varian, a Siemens Healthineers company, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - S Hatcher
- Global Translational Science, Varian, a Siemens Healthineers company, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - A A Ku
- Global Translational Science, Varian, a Siemens Healthineers company, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Z Ding
- Global Translational Science, Varian, a Siemens Healthineers company, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - F Y Feng
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - R A Sharma
- Global Translational Science, Varian, a Siemens Healthineers company, Palo Alto, California, USA; UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - S X Pfister
- Global Translational Science, Varian, a Siemens Healthineers company, Palo Alto, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lin SH, Willers H, Krishnan S, Sarkaria JN, Baumann M, Lawrence TS. Moving Beyond the Standard of Care: Accelerate Testing of Radiation-Drug Combinations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:1131-1139. [PMID: 34454045 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is a major treatment modality used in > 60% of cancer patients as definitive local treatment for inoperable locoregionally confined tumors and as palliative therapy. Although cytotoxic chemotherapy enhances the effectiveness of treatment, the benefit over radiation therapy alone is modest. There is a need to enhance the effectiveness of local tumor control over what sequentially or concurrently administered cytotoxic chemotherapy provides. Although many biological pathways are known to enhance the effectiveness of radiation therapy, there is currently a paucity of drugs approved for use in combination. Several clinical trials have tested the effectiveness of combining targeted agents or immunotherapies with radiation therapy, but the results of these trials have been negative, likely stemming from the relative lack of preclinical evidence using appropriate experimental standardization or model systems. Accelerating the identification of agents tested in an appropriate clinical context and experimental systems or models would greatly enhance the potential to bring forward early testing of drugs that would not only be safe but also more effective. This article provides an overview of the opportunities and challenges of developing therapeutics to combine with radiation therapy, and some guidance toward preclinical and early clinical testing to improve the chance that advanced phase testing of drug-radiation combinations would be successful in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Theodore S Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Suckert T, Nexhipi S, Dietrich A, Koch R, Kunz-Schughart LA, Bahn E, Beyreuther E. Models for Translational Proton Radiobiology-From Bench to Bedside and Back. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4216. [PMID: 34439370 PMCID: PMC8395028 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The number of proton therapy centers worldwide are increasing steadily, with more than two million cancer patients treated so far. Despite this development, pending questions on proton radiobiology still call for basic and translational preclinical research. Open issues are the on-going discussion on an energy-dependent varying proton RBE (relative biological effectiveness), a better characterization of normal tissue side effects and combination treatments with drugs originally developed for photon therapy. At the same time, novel possibilities arise, such as radioimmunotherapy, and new proton therapy schemata, such as FLASH irradiation and proton mini-beams. The study of those aspects demands for radiobiological models at different stages along the translational chain, allowing the investigation of mechanisms from the molecular level to whole organisms. Focusing on the challenges and specifics of proton research, this review summarizes the different available models, ranging from in vitro systems to animal studies of increasing complexity as well as complementing in silico approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Suckert
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (T.S.); (S.N.); (A.D.); (L.A.K.-S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sindi Nexhipi
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (T.S.); (S.N.); (A.D.); (L.A.K.-S.)
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, 01309 Dresden, Germany
| | - Antje Dietrich
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (T.S.); (S.N.); (A.D.); (L.A.K.-S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robin Koch
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (R.K.); (E.B.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Leoni A. Kunz-Schughart
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (T.S.); (S.N.); (A.D.); (L.A.K.-S.)
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Emanuel Bahn
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (R.K.); (E.B.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elke Beyreuther
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (T.S.); (S.N.); (A.D.); (L.A.K.-S.)
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Willers H, Pan X, Borgeaud N, Korovina I, Koi L, Egan R, Greninger P, Rosenkranz A, Kung J, Liss AS, Parsels LA, Morgan MA, Lawrence TS, Lin SH, Hong TS, Yeap BY, Wirth L, Hata AN, Ott CJ, Benes CH, Baumann M, Krause M. Screening and Validation of Molecular Targeted Radiosensitizers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:e63-e74. [PMID: 34343607 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The development of molecular targeted drugs with radiation and chemotherapy are critically important for improving the outcomes of patients with hard-to-treat, potentially curable cancers. However, too many preclinical studies have not translated into successful radiation oncology trials. Major contributing factors to this insufficiency include poor reproducibility of preclinical data, inadequate preclinical modeling of inter-tumoral genomic heterogeneity that influences treatment sensitivity in the clinic, and a reliance on tumor growth delay instead of local control (TCD50) endpoints. There exists an urgent need to overcome these barriers to facilitate successful clinical translation of targeted radiosensitizers. To this end, we have employed 3D cell culture assays to better model tumor behavior in vivo. Examples of successful prediction of in vivo effects with these 3D assays include radiosensitization of head and neck cancers by inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor or focal adhesion kinase signaling, and radioresistance associated with oncogenic mutation of KRAS. To address the issue of tumor heterogeneity we leveraged institutional resources that allow high-throughput 3D screening of radiation combinations with small molecule inhibitors across genomically characterized cell lines from lung, head and neck, and pancreatic cancers. This high-throughput screen is expected to uncover genomic biomarkers that will inform the successful clinical translation of targeted agents from the NCI CTEP portfolio and other sources. Screening "hits" need to be subjected to refinement studies that include clonogenic assays, addition of disease-specific chemotherapeutics, target/biomarker validation, and integration of patient-derived tumor models. The chemoradiosensitizing activities of the most promising drugs should be confirmed in TCD50 assays in xenograft models with/without relevant biomarker and utilizing clinically relevant radiation fractionation. We predict that appropriately validated and biomarker-directed targeted therapies will have a higher likelihood than past efforts to be successfully incorporated into the standard management of hard-to-treat tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Xiao Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nathalie Borgeaud
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden
| | - Irina Korovina
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lydia Koi
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Regina Egan
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Patricia Greninger
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Aliza Rosenkranz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jong Kung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew S Liss
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Leslie A Parsels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Meredith A Morgan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Theodore S Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beow Y Yeap
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lori Wirth
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aaron N Hata
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher J Ott
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Cyril H Benes
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core center Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Partner site Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rødland GE, Hauge S, Hasvold G, Bay LTE, Raabe TTH, Joel M, Syljuåsen RG. Differential Effects of Combined ATR/WEE1 Inhibition in Cancer Cells. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153790. [PMID: 34359691 PMCID: PMC8345075 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cancer cells often show elevated replication stress and loss of cell cycle checkpoints. The ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) and WEE1 kinases play roles in protecting cancer cells from high replication stress and in regulating the remaining cell cycle checkpoints. Inhibitors of ATR or WEE1 therefore have the potential to selectively kill cancer cells and are currently being tested in clinical trials. However, more studies are needed to understand how these inhibitors work in various types of cancer and to find the most effective ways of using them. Here, we have explored whether simultaneous treatment with ATR and WEE1 inhibitors is a promising approach. Effects were investigated in cell lines from osteosarcoma and lung cancer. We expect our results to be of importance for future treatment strategies with these inhibitors. Abstract Inhibitors of WEE1 and ATR kinases are considered promising for cancer treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemo- or radiotherapy. Here, we addressed whether simultaneous inhibition of WEE1 and ATR might be advantageous. Effects of the WEE1 inhibitor MK1775 and ATR inhibitor VE822 were investigated in U2OS osteosarcoma cells and in four lung cancer cell lines, H460, A549, H1975, and SW900, with different sensitivities to the WEE1 inhibitor. Despite the differences in cytotoxic effects, the WEE1 inhibitor reduced the inhibitory phosphorylation of CDK, leading to increased CDK activity accompanied by ATR activation in all cell lines. However, combining ATR inhibition with WEE1 inhibition could not fully compensate for cell resistance to the WEE1 inhibitor and reduced cell viability to a variable extent. The decreased cell viability upon the combined treatment correlated with a synergistic induction of DNA damage in S-phase in U2OS cells but not in the lung cancer cells. Moreover, less synergy was found between ATR and WEE1 inhibitors upon co-treatment with radiation, suggesting that single inhibitors may be preferable together with radiotherapy. Altogether, our results support that combining WEE1 and ATR inhibitors may be beneficial for cancer treatment in some cases, but also highlight that the effects vary between cancer cell lines.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kazokaitė-Adomaitienė J, Becker HM, Smirnovienė J, Dubois LJ, Matulis D. Experimental Approaches to Identify Selective Picomolar Inhibitors for Carbonic Anhydrase IX. Curr Med Chem 2021; 28:3361-3384. [PMID: 33138744 DOI: 10.2174/0929867327666201102112841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) regulate pH homeostasis via the reversible hydration of CO2, thereby emerging as essential enzymes for many vital functions. Among 12 catalytically active CA isoforms in humans, CA IX has become a relevant therapeutic target because of its role in cancer progression. Only two CA IX inhibitors have entered clinical trials, mostly due to low affinity and selectivity properties. OBJECTIVE The current review presents the design, development, and identification of the selective nano- to picomolar CA IX inhibitors VD11-4-2, VR16-09, and VD12-09. METHODS AND RESULTS Compounds were selected from our database, composed of over 400 benzensulfonamides, synthesized at our laboratory, and tested for their binding to 12 human CAs. Here we discuss the CA CO2 hydratase activity/inhibition assay and several biophysical techniques, such as fluorescent thermal shift assay and isothermal titration calorimetry, highlighting their contribution to the analysis of compound affinity and structure- activity relationships. To obtain sufficient amounts of recombinant CAs for inhibitor screening, several gene cloning and protein purification strategies are presented, including site-directed CA mutants, heterologous CAs from Xenopus oocytes, and native endogenous CAs. The cancer cell-based methods, such as clonogenicity, extracellular acidification, and mass spectrometric gas-analysis are reviewed, confirming nanomolar activities of lead inhibitors in intact cancer cells. CONCLUSIONS Novel CA IX inhibitors are promising derivatives for in vivo explorations. Furthermore, the simultaneous targeting of several proteins involved in proton flux upon tumor acidosis and the disruption of transport metabolons might improve cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justina Kazokaitė-Adomaitienė
- Department of Biothermodynamics and Drug Design, Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Holger M Becker
- Institute of Physiological Chemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Joana Smirnovienė
- Department of Biothermodynamics and Drug Design, Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Ludwig J Dubois
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Netherlands
| | - Daumantas Matulis
- Department of Biothermodynamics and Drug Design, Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Current and Future Perspectives of the Use of Organoids in Radiobiology. Cells 2020; 9:cells9122649. [PMID: 33317153 PMCID: PMC7764598 DOI: 10.3390/cells9122649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The majority of cancer patients will be treated with radiotherapy, either alone or together with chemotherapy and/or surgery. Optimising the balance between tumour control and the probability of normal tissue side effects is the primary goal of radiation treatment. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the effects that irradiation will have on both normal and cancer tissue. The more classical lab models of immortal cell lines and in vivo animal models have been fundamental to radiobiological studies to date. However, each of these comes with their own limitations and new complementary models are required to fill the gaps left by these traditional models. In this review, we discuss how organoids, three-dimensional tissue-resembling structures derived from tissue-resident, embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells, overcome the limitations of these models and thus have a growing importance in the field of radiation biology research. The roles of organoids in understanding radiation-induced tissue responses and in moving towards precision medicine are examined. Finally, the limitations of organoids in radiobiology and the steps being made to overcome these limitations are considered.
Collapse
|
17
|
George TJ, Franke AJ, Chakravarthy AB, Das P, Dasari A, El-Rayes BF, Hong TS, Kinsella TJ, Landry JC, Lee JJ, Monjazeb AM, Jacobs SA, Raben D, Rahma OE, Williams TM, Wu C, Coleman CN, Vikram B, Ahmed MM. National Cancer Institute (NCI) state of the science: Targeted radiosensitizers in colorectal cancer. Cancer 2019; 125:2732-2746. [PMID: 31017664 PMCID: PMC6663584 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a major public health problem as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Of an estimated 140,000 newly diagnosed CRC cases in 2018, roughly one-third of these patients will have a primary tumor located in the distal large bowel or rectum. The current standard-of-care approach includes curative-intent surgery, often after preoperative (neoadjuvant) radiotherapy (RT), to increase rates of tumor down-staging, clinical and pathologic response, as well as improving surgical resection quality. However, despite advancements in surgical techniques, as well as sharpened precision of dosimetry offered by contemporary RT delivery platforms, the oncology community continues to face challenges related to disease relapse. Ongoing investigations are aimed at testing novel radiosensitizing agents and treatments that might exploit the systemic antitumor effects of RT using immunotherapies. If successful, these treatments may usher in a new curative paradigm for rectal cancers, such that surgical interventions may be avoided. Importantly, this disease offers an opportunity to correlate matched paired biopsies, radiographic response, and molecular mechanisms of treatment sensitivity and resistance with clinical outcomes. Herein, the authors highlight the available evidence from preclinical models and early-phase studies, with an emphasis on promising developmental therapeutics undergoing prospective validation in larger scale clinical trials. This review by the National Cancer Institute's Radiation Research Program Colorectal Cancer Working Group provides an updated, comprehensive examination of the continuously evolving state of the science regarding radiosensitizer drug development in the curative treatment of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J George
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Aaron J Franke
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - A Bapsi Chakravarthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Arvind Dasari
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bassel F El-Rayes
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Timothy J Kinsella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital-Brown University Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Jerome C Landry
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - James J Lee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Arta M Monjazeb
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Samuel A Jacobs
- National Adjuvant Surgical and Bowel Project Foundation/NRG Oncology, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania
| | - David Raben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Osama E Rahma
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Terence M Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Christina Wu
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - C Norman Coleman
- Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, Radiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Bhadrasain Vikram
- Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, Radiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mansoor M Ahmed
- Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch, Radiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Carter R, Cheraghchi-Bashi A, Westhorpe A, Yu S, Shanneik Y, Seraia E, Ouaret D, Inoue Y, Koch C, Wilding J, Ebner D, Ryan AJ, Buffa FM, Sharma RA. Identification of anticancer drugs to radiosensitise BRAF-wild-type and mutant colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Med 2019; 16:234-246. [PMID: 31516745 PMCID: PMC6713640 DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer (CRC) have a poor prognosis. Molecular status is not currently used to select which drug to use in combination with radiotherapy. Our aim was to identify drugs that radiosensitise CRC cells with known BRAF status. METHODS We screened 298 oncological drugs with and without ionising radiation in colorectal cancer cells isogenic for BRAF. Hits from rank product analysis were validated in a 16-cell line panel of human CRC cell lines, using clonogenic survival assays and xenograft models in vivo. RESULTS Most consistently identified hits were drugs targeting cell growth/proliferation or DNA damage repair. The most effective class of drugs that radiosensitised wild-type and mutant cell lines was PARP inhibitors. In clonogenic survival assays, talazoparib produced a radiation enhancement ratio of 1.9 in DLD1 (BRAF-wildtype) cells and 1.8 in RKO (BRAF V600E) cells. In DLD1 xenografts, talazoparib significantly increased the inhibitory effect of radiation on tumour growth (P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Our method for screening large drug libraries for radiosensitisation has identified PARP inhibitors as promising radiosensitisers of colorectal cancer cells with wild-type and mutant BRAF backgrounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Carter
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Azadeh Cheraghchi-Bashi
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Adam Westhorpe
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Sheng Yu
- Computational Biology and Integrative Genomics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Yasmin Shanneik
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Elena Seraia
- NDM Research Building, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Djamila Ouaret
- Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Yasuhiro Inoue
- Mie University, Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Division of Reparative Medicine, Institute of Life Sciences, Edobashi 2-174, Tsu, Japan
| | - Catherine Koch
- Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Jenny Wilding
- Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Daniel Ebner
- Target Discovery Institute, National Phenotypic Screening Centre, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Anderson J. Ryan
- CRUK & MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Francesca M. Buffa
- CRUK & MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Ricky A. Sharma
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dinkelborg PH, Wang M, Gheorghiu L, Gurski JM, Hong TS, Benes CH, Juric D, Jimenez RB, Borgmann K, Willers H. A common Chk1-dependent phenotype of DNA double-strand break suppression in two distinct radioresistant cancer types. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 174:605-613. [PMID: 30607635 PMCID: PMC6440812 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-05079-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) are often resistant to treatment with ionizing radiation (IR). We sought to investigate whether pharmacologic inhibition of Chk1 kinase, which is commonly overexpressed in TNBC, preferentially sensitizes TNBC cells to IR. METHODS Ten breast cancer cell lines were screened with small molecule inhibitors against Chk1 and other kinases. Chk1 inhibition was also tested in isogenic KRAS mutant or wild-type cancer cells. Cellular radiosensitization was measured by short-term and clonogenic survival assays and by staining for the DNA double-strand break (DSB) marker γ-H2AX. Radiosensitization was also assessed in breast cancer biopsies using an ex vivo assay. Aurora B kinase-dependent mitosis-like chromatin condensation, a marker of radioresistance, was detected using a specific antibody against co-localized phosphorylation of serine 10 and trimethylation of lysine 9 on histone 3 (H3K9me3/S10p). Expression of CHEK1 and associated genes was evaluated in TNBC and lung adenocarcinoma. RESULTS Inhibition of Chk1 kinase preferentially radiosensitized TNBC cells in vitro and in patient biopsies. Interestingly, TNBC cells displayed lower numbers of IR-induced DSBs than non-TNBC cells, correlating with their observed radioresistance. We found that Chk1 suppressed IR-induced DSBs in these cells, which was dependent on H3K9me3/S10p-a chromatin mark previously found to indicate radioresistance in KRAS mutant cancers. Accordingly, the effects of Chk1 inhibition in TNBC were reproduced in KRAS mutant but not wild-type cells. We also observed co-expression of genes in this Chk1 chromatin pathway in TNBC and KRAS mutant lung cancers. CONCLUSIONS Chk1 promotes an unexpected, common phenotype of chromatin-dependent DSB suppression in radioresistant TNBC and KRAS mutant cancer cells, providing a direction for future investigations into overcoming the treatment resistance of TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick H Dinkelborg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Experimental Radiooncology, Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Meng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Liliana Gheorghiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Joseph M Gurski
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Cyril H Benes
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Dejan Juric
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Rachel B Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Kerstin Borgmann
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Experimental Radiooncology, Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Paganetti H, Blakely E, Carabe-Fernandez A, Carlson DJ, Das IJ, Dong L, Grosshans D, Held KD, Mohan R, Moiseenko V, Niemierko A, Stewart RD, Willers H. Report of the AAPM TG-256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy. Med Phys 2019; 46:e53-e78. [PMID: 30661238 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The biological effectiveness of proton beams relative to photon beams in radiation therapy has been taken to be 1.1 throughout the history of proton therapy. While potentially appropriate as an average value, actual relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values may differ. This Task Group report outlines the basic concepts of RBE as well as the biophysical interpretation and mathematical concepts. The current knowledge on RBE variations is reviewed and discussed in the context of the current clinical use of RBE and the clinical relevance of RBE variations (with respect to physical as well as biological parameters). The following task group aims were designed to guide the current clinical practice: Assess whether the current clinical practice of using a constant RBE for protons should be revised or maintained. Identifying sites and treatment strategies where variable RBE might be utilized for a clinical benefit. Assess the potential clinical consequences of delivering biologically weighted proton doses based on variable RBE and/or LET models implemented in treatment planning systems. Recommend experiments needed to improve our current understanding of the relationships among in vitro, in vivo, and clinical RBE, and the research required to develop models. Develop recommendations to minimize the effects of uncertainties associated with proton RBE for well-defined tumor types and critical structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eleanor Blakely
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | | | - David J Carlson
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Indra J Das
- New York University Langone Medical Center & Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathryn D Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vitali Moiseenko
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Andrzej Niemierko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert D Stewart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Liu Q, Ma L, Jones T, Palomero L, Pujana MA, Martinez-Ruiz H, Ha PK, Murnane J, Cuartas I, Seoane J, Baumann M, Linge A, Barcellos-Hoff MH. Subjugation of TGFβ Signaling by Human Papilloma Virus in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Shifts DNA Repair from Homologous Recombination to Alternative End Joining. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:6001-6014. [PMID: 30087144 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Revised: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Following cytotoxic therapy, 70% of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are alive at 5 years compared with 30% of those with similar HPV-negative cancer. Loss of TGFβ signaling is a poorly studied consequence of HPV that could contribute to patient outcome by compromising DNA repair. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Human HNSCC cell lines (n = 9), patient-derived xenografts (n = 9), tissue microarray (n = 194), TCGA expression data (n = 279), and primary tumor specimens (n = 10) were used to define the relationship between TGFβ competency, response to DNA damage, and type of DNA repair. RESULTS Analysis of HNSCC specimens in situ and in vitro showed that HPV associated with loss of TGFβ signaling that increased response to radiation or cisplatin. TGFβ suppressed miR-182, which inhibited both BRCA1, necessary for homologous recombination repair (HRR), and FOXO3, required for ATM kinase activity. TGFβ signaling blockade by either HPV or inhibitors released miR182 control, compromised HRR and increased response to PARP inhibition. Antagonizing miR-182 rescued the HRR deficit in HPV-positive cells. Loss of TGFβ signaling unexpectedly increased repair by error prone, alternative end-joining (alt-EJ). CONCLUSIONS HPV-positive HNSCC cells are unresponsive to TGFβ. Abrogated TGFβ signaling compromises repair by HRR and increases reliance on alt-EJ, which provides a mechanistic basis for sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. The effect of HPV in HNSCC provides critical validation of TGFβ's role in DNA repair proficiency and further raises the translational potential of TGFβ inhibitors in cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Lin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Trevor Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Luis Palomero
- ProCURE, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miquel Angel Pujana
- ProCURE, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Patrick K Ha
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - John Murnane
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Isabel Cuartas
- Vall d Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Seoane
- Vall d Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael Baumann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; and Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Annett Linge
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Biophysical, Biochemical, and Cell Based Approaches Used to Decipher the Role of Carbonic Anhydrases in Cancer and to Evaluate the Potency of Targeted Inhibitors. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY 2018; 2018:2906519. [PMID: 30112206 PMCID: PMC6077552 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2906519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) are thought to be important for regulating pH in the tumor microenvironment. A few of the CA isoforms are upregulated in cancer cells, with only limited expression in normal cells. For these reasons, there is interest in developing inhibitors that target these tumor-associated CA isoforms, with increased efficacy but limited nonspecific cytotoxicity. Here we present some of the biophysical, biochemical, and cell based techniques and approaches that can be used to evaluate the potency of CA targeted inhibitors and decipher the role of CAs in tumorigenesis, cancer progression, and metastatic processes. These techniques include esterase activity assays, stop flow kinetics, and mass inlet mass spectroscopy (MIMS), all of which measure enzymatic activity of purified protein, in the presence or absence of inhibitors. Also discussed is the application of X-ray crystallography and Cryo-EM as well as other structure-based techniques and thermal shift assays to the studies of CA structure and function. Further, large-scale genomic and proteomic analytical methods, as well as cell based techniques like those that measure cell growth, apoptosis, clonogenicity, and cell migration and invasion, are discussed. We conclude by reviewing approaches that test the metastatic potential of CAs and how the aforementioned techniques have contributed to the field of CA cancer research.
Collapse
|
23
|
Toward A variable RBE for proton beam therapy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:68-75. [PMID: 29910006 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
In the clinic, proton beam therapy (PBT) is based on the use of a generic relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 compared to photons in human cancers and normal tissues. However, the experimental basis for this RBE lacks any significant number of representative tumor models and clinically relevant endpoints for dose-limiting organs at risk. It is now increasingly appreciated that much of the variations of treatment responses in cancers are due to inter-tumoral genomic heterogeneity. Indeed, recently it has been shown that defects in certain DNA repair pathways, which are found in subsets of many cancers, are associated with a RBE increase in vitro. However, there currently exist little in vivo or clinical data that confirm the existence of similarly increased RBE values in human cancers. Furthermore, evidence for variable RBE values for normal tissue toxicity has been sparse and conflicting to date. If we could predict variable RBE values in patients, we would be able to optimally use and personalize PBT. For example, predictive tumor biomarkers may facilitate selection of patients with proton-sensitive cancers previously ineligible for PBT. Dose de-escalation may be possible to reduce normal tissue toxicity, especially in pediatric patients. Knowledge of increased tumor RBE may allow us to develop biologically optimized therapies to enhance local control while RBE biomarkers for normal tissues could lead to a better understanding and prevention of unusual PBT-associated toxicity. Here, we will review experimental data on the repair of proton damage to DNA that impact both RBE values and biophysical modeling to predict RBE variations. Experimental approaches for studying proton sensitivity in vitro and in vivo will be reviewed as well and recent clinical findings discussed. Ultimately, therapeutically exploiting the understudied biological advantages of protons and developing approaches to limit treatment toxicity should fundamentally impact the clinical use of PBT.
Collapse
|
24
|
PARP-1 inhibition with or without ionizing radiation confers reactive oxygen species-mediated cytotoxicity preferentially to cancer cells with mutant TP53. Oncogene 2018; 37:2793-2805. [PMID: 29511347 PMCID: PMC5970015 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-018-0130-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Revised: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Biomarkers and mechanisms of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor-mediated cytotoxicity in tumor cells lacking a BRCA-mutant or BRCA-like phenotype are poorly defined. We sought to explore the utility of PARP-1 inhibitor (PARPi) treatment with/without ionizing radiation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), which has poor therapeutic outcomes. We assessed the DNA damaging and cytotoxic effects of the PARPi olaparib in nine bladder cancer cell lines. Olaparib radiosensitized all cell lines with dose enhancement factors from 1.22 to 2.27. Radiosensitization was correlated with the induction of potentially lethal DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) but not with RAD51 foci formation. The ability of olaparib to radiosensitize MIBC cells was linked to the extent of cell kill achieved with drug alone. Unexpectedly, increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting from PARPi treatment were the cause of DSB throughout the cell cycle in-vitro and in-vivo. ROS originated from mitochondria and were required for the radiosensitizing effects of olaparib. Consistent with the role of TP53 in ROS regulation, loss of p53 function enhanced radiosensitization by olaparib in non-isogenic and isogenic cell line models and was associated with increased PARP-1 expression in bladder cancer cell lines and tumors. Impairment of ATM in addition to p53 loss resulted in an even more pronounced radiosensitization. In conclusion, ROS suppression by PARP-1 in MIBC is a potential therapeutic target either for PARPi combined with radiation or drug alone treatment. The TP53 and ATM genes, commonly mutated in MIBC and other cancers, are candidate biomarkers of PARPi-mediated radiosensitization.
Collapse
|
25
|
Citrin DE. Short-Term Screening Assays for the Identification of Therapeutics for Cancer. Cancer Res 2017; 76:3443-5. [PMID: 27306870 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-1299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2016] [Accepted: 05/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah E Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hong TS, Wo JY, Borger DR, Yeap BY, McDonnell EI, Willers H, Blaszkowsky LS, Kwak EL, Allen JN, Clark JW, Tanguturi S, Goyal L, Murphy JE, Wolfgang JA, Drapek LC, Arellano RS, Mamon HJ, Mullen JT, Tanabe KK, Ferrone CR, Ryan DP, Iafrate AJ, DeLaney TF, Zhu AX. Phase II Study of Proton-Based Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases: Importance of Tumor Genotype. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017; 109:3852626. [PMID: 28954285 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2016] [Accepted: 02/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We evaluated the efficacy and safety of risk-adapted, proton-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver metastases from solid tumors. Methods This single-arm phase II single institutional study (NCT01239381) included patients with limited extrahepatic disease, 800 mL or greater of uninvolved liver, and no cirrhosis or Child-Pugh A, who had received proton-based SBRT to one to four liver metastases from solid tumors. Treatment comprised 30 to 50 Gray equivalent (GyE) in five fractions based on the effective volume of liver irradiated. Sample size was calculated to determine if local control (LC) at one year was greater than 70%. The cumulative incidence of local failure was used to estimate LC. The association of tumor characteristics, including genetic alterations in common cancer genes such as BRAF, EGFR, HER2, KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53 with local tumor control, was assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Eighty-nine patients were evaluable (colorectal, n = 34; pancreatic, n = 13; esophagogastric, n = 12; other, n = 30). Median tumor size was 2.5 cm (range = 0.5-11.9 cm). Median dose was 40 GyE (range = 30-50 GyE), and median follow-up was 30.1 months (range = 14.7-53.8 months). There was no grade 3 to 5 toxicity. Median survival time was 18.1 months. The one- and three-year LC rates were 71.9% (95% confidence limit [CL] = 62.3% to 80.9%) and 61.2% (95% CL = 50.8% to 71.8%), respectively. For large tumors (≥6 cm), one-year LC remained high at 73.9% (95% CL = 54.6% to 89.8%). Mutation in the KRAS oncogene was the strongest predictor of poor LC (P = .02). Tumor with both mutant KRAS and TP53 were particularly radioresistant, with a one-year LC rate of only 20.0%, compared with 69.2% for all others (P = .001). Conclusions We report the largest prospective evaluation to date of liver SBRT for hepatic metastases, and the first with protons. Protons were remarkably well tolerated and effective even for metastases that were 6 cm or larger. KRAS mutation is a strong predictor of poor LC, stressing the need for tumor genotyping prior to SBRT and treatment intensification in this patient subset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Darrell R Borger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Beow Y Yeap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Erin I McDonnell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lawrence S Blaszkowsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Eunice L Kwak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jill N Allen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shyam Tanguturi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lipika Goyal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Janet E Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - John A Wolfgang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lorraine C Drapek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ronald S Arellano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Harvey J Mamon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - John T Mullen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kenneth K Tanabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Cristina R Ferrone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - David P Ryan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - A John Iafrate
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas F DeLaney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew X Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wang M, Han J, Marcar L, Black J, Liu Q, Li X, Nagulapalli K, Sequist LV, Mak RH, Benes CH, Hong TS, Gurtner K, Krause M, Baumann M, Kang JX, Whetstine JR, Willers H. Radiation Resistance in KRAS-Mutated Lung Cancer Is Enabled by Stem-like Properties Mediated by an Osteopontin-EGFR Pathway. Cancer Res 2017; 77:2018-2028. [PMID: 28202526 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-0808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2016] [Revised: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 01/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancers with activating KRAS mutations are characterized by treatment resistance and poor prognosis. In particular, the basis for their resistance to radiation therapy is poorly understood. Here, we describe a radiation resistance phenotype conferred by a stem-like subpopulation characterized by mitosis-like condensed chromatin (MLCC), high CD133 expression, invasive potential, and tumor-initiating properties. Mechanistic investigations defined a pathway involving osteopontin and the EGFR in promoting this phenotype. Osteopontin/EGFR-dependent MLCC protected cells against radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks and repressed putative negative regulators of stem-like properties, such as CRMP1 and BIM. The MLCC-positive phenotype defined a subset of KRAS-mutated lung cancers that were enriched for co-occurring genomic alterations in TP53 and CDKN2A. Our results illuminate the basis for the radiation resistance of KRAS-mutated lung cancers, with possible implications for prognostic and therapeutic strategies. Cancer Res; 77(8); 2018-28. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jing Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Jinan Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shandong, China
| | - Lynnette Marcar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Josh Black
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.,Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Qi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xiangyong Li
- Laboratory for Lipid Medicine and Technology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Kshithija Nagulapalli
- Center for Computational Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lecia V Sequist
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Raymond H Mak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Cyril H Benes
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kristin Gurtner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Oncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Oncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Oncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jing X Kang
- Laboratory for Lipid Medicine and Technology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Johnathan R Whetstine
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Coleman CN, Higgins GS, Brown JM, Baumann M, Kirsch DG, Willers H, Prasanna PGS, Dewhirst MW, Bernhard EJ, Ahmed MM. Improving the Predictive Value of Preclinical Studies in Support of Radiotherapy Clinical Trials. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22:3138-47. [PMID: 27154913 PMCID: PMC4930691 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
There is an urgent need to improve reproducibility and translatability of preclinical data to fully exploit opportunities for molecular therapeutics involving radiation and radiochemotherapy. For in vitro research, the clonogenic assay remains the current state-of-the-art of preclinical assays, whereas newer moderate and high-throughput assays offer the potential for rapid initial screening. Studies of radiation response modification by molecularly targeted agents can be improved using more physiologic 3D culture models. Elucidating effects on the cancer stem cells (CSC, and CSC-like) and developing biomarkers for defining targets and measuring responses are also important. In vivo studies are necessary to confirm in vitro findings, further define mechanism of action, and address immunomodulation and treatment-induced modification of the microenvironment. Newer in vivo models include genetically engineered and patient-derived xenograft mouse models and spontaneously occurring cancers in domesticated animals. Selection of appropriate endpoints is important for in vivo studies; for example, regrowth delay measures bulk tumor killing, whereas local tumor control assesses effects on CSCs. The reliability of individual assays requires standardization of procedures and cross-laboratory validation. Radiation modifiers must be tested as part of clinical standard of care, which includes radiochemotherapy for most tumors. Radiation models are compatible with but also differ from those used for drug screening. Furthermore, the mechanism of a drug as a chemotherapeutic agent may be different from its interaction with radiation and/or radiochemotherapy. This provides an opportunity to expand the use of molecular-targeted agents. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3138-47. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Norman Coleman
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Geoff S Higgins
- Cancer Research UK/Medical Research Council, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - J Martin Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay National Center for Radiation Research, Technische Universität Dresden/Helmholtz-Zenrtum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany and German Cancer Consortium, Dresden/German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
| | - David G Kirsch
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pataje G S Prasanna
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mark W Dewhirst
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Pathology and Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eric J Bernhard
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mansoor M Ahmed
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Willers H, Gheorghiu L, Liu Q, Efstathiou JA, Wirth LJ, Krause M, von Neubeck C. DNA Damage Response Assessments in Human Tumor Samples Provide Functional Biomarkers of Radiosensitivity. Semin Radiat Oncol 2015; 25:237-50. [PMID: 26384272 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2015.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Predictive biomarkers are urgently needed for individualization of radiation therapy and treatment with radiosensitizing anticancer agents. Genomic profiling of human cancers provides us with unprecedented insight into the mutational landscape of genes directly or indirectly involved in the response to radiation-induced DNA damage. However, to what extent this wealth of structural information about the cancer genome produces biomarkers of sensitivity to radiation remains to be seen. Investigators are increasingly studying the subnuclear accumulation (ie, foci) of proteins in the DNA damage response (DDR), such as gamma-H2AX, 53BP1, or RAD51, as a surrogate of treatment sensitivity. Recent findings from preclinical studies have demonstrated the predictive potential of DDR foci by correlating foci with clinically relevant end points such as tumor control probability. Therefore, preclinical investigations of DDR foci responses are increasingly moving into cells and tissues from patients, which is the major focus of this review. The advantage of using DDR foci as functional biomarkers is that they can detect alterations in DNA repair due to various mechanisms. Moreover, they provide a global measurement of DDR network function without needing to know the identities of all the components, many of which remain unknown. Foci assays are thus expected to yield functional insight that may complement or supersede genomic information, thereby giving radiation oncologists unique opportunities to individualize cancer treatments in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
| | - Liliana Gheorghiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Qi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Lori J Wirth
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mechthild Krause
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|