1
|
Lynch AR, Bradford S, Zhou AS, Oxendine K, Henderson L, Horner VL, Weaver BA, Burkard ME. A survey of chromosomal instability measures across mechanistic models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2309621121. [PMID: 38588415 PMCID: PMC11032477 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2309621121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Chromosomal instability (CIN) is the persistent reshuffling of cancer karyotypes via chromosome mis-segregation during cell division. In cancer, CIN exists at varying levels that have differential effects on tumor progression. However, mis-segregation rates remain challenging to assess in human cancer despite an array of available measures. We evaluated measures of CIN by comparing quantitative methods using specific, inducible phenotypic CIN models of chromosome bridges, pseudobipolar spindles, multipolar spindles, and polar chromosomes. For each, we measured CIN fixed and timelapse fluorescence microscopy, chromosome spreads, six-centromere FISH, bulk transcriptomics, and single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq). As expected, microscopy of tumor cells in live and fixed samples significantly correlated (R = 0.72; P < 0.001) and sensitively detect CIN. Cytogenetics approaches include chromosome spreads and 6-centromere FISH, which also significantly correlate (R = 0.76; P < 0.001) but had limited sensitivity for lower rates of CIN. Bulk genomic DNA signatures and bulk transcriptomic scores, CIN70 and HET70, did not detect CIN. By contrast, scDNAseq detects CIN with high sensitivity, and significantly correlates with imaging methods (R = 0.82; P < 0.001). In summary, single-cell methods such as imaging, cytogenetics, and scDNAseq can measure CIN, with the latter being the most comprehensive method accessible to clinical samples. To facilitate the comparison of CIN rates between phenotypes and methods, we propose a standardized unit of CIN: Mis-segregations per Diploid Division. This systematic analysis of common CIN measures highlights the superiority of single-cell methods and provides guidance for measuring CIN in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R. Lynch
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Shermineh Bradford
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Amber S. Zhou
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Kim Oxendine
- Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Services Laboratory, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53706
| | - Les Henderson
- Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Services Laboratory, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53706
| | - Vanessa L. Horner
- Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Services Laboratory, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53706
| | - Beth A. Weaver
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Mark E. Burkard
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
- Division of Hematology Oncology and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI53705
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marques JF, Kops GJPL. Permission to pass: on the role of p53 as a gatekeeper for aneuploidy. Chromosome Res 2023; 31:31. [PMID: 37864038 PMCID: PMC10589155 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-023-09741-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
Aneuploidy-the karyotype state in which the number of chromosomes deviates from a multiple of the haploid chromosome set-is common in cancer, where it is thought to facilitate tumor initiation and progression. However, it is poorly tolerated in healthy cells: during development and tissue homeostasis, aneuploid cells are efficiently cleared from the population. It is still largely unknown how cancer cells become, and adapt to being, aneuploid. P53, the gatekeeper of the genome, has been proposed to guard against aneuploidy. Aneuploidy in cancer genomes strongly correlates with mutations in TP53, and p53 is thought to prevent the propagation of aneuploid cells. Whether p53 also participates in preventing the mistakes in cell division that lead to aneuploidy is still under debate. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the role of p53 in protecting cells from aneuploidy, and we explore the consequences of functional p53 loss for the propagation of aneuploidy in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana F Marques
- Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Hubrecht Institute, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584CT, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Jaarbeursplein 6, 3521AL, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geert J P L Kops
- Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Hubrecht Institute, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584CT, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
- Oncode Institute, Jaarbeursplein 6, 3521AL, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhou AS, Tucker JB, Scribano CM, Lynch AR, Carlsen CL, Pop-Vicas ST, Pattaswamy SM, Burkard ME, Weaver BA. Diverse microtubule-targeted anticancer agents kill cells by inducing chromosome missegregation on multipolar spindles. PLoS Biol 2023; 21:e3002339. [PMID: 37883329 PMCID: PMC10602348 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Microtubule-targeted agents are commonly used for cancer treatment, though many patients do not benefit. Microtubule-targeted drugs were assumed to elicit anticancer activity via mitotic arrest because they cause cell death following mitotic arrest in cell culture. However, we recently demonstrated that intratumoral paclitaxel concentrations are insufficient to induce mitotic arrest and rather induce chromosomal instability (CIN) via multipolar mitotic spindles. Here, we show in metastatic breast cancer and relevant human cellular models that this mechanism is conserved among clinically useful microtubule poisons. While multipolar divisions typically produce inviable progeny, multipolar spindles can be focused into near-normal bipolar spindles at any stage of mitosis. Using a novel method to quantify the rate of CIN, we demonstrate that cell death positively correlates with net loss of DNA. Spindle focusing decreases CIN and causes resistance to diverse microtubule poisons, which can be counteracted by addition of a drug that increases CIN without affecting spindle polarity. These results demonstrate conserved mechanisms of action and resistance for diverse microtubule-targeted agents. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03393741.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber S. Zhou
- Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - John B. Tucker
- Cancer Biology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Christina M. Scribano
- Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Andrew R. Lynch
- Cellular and Molecular Pathology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Caleb L. Carlsen
- Cellular and Molecular Biology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Sophia T. Pop-Vicas
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Srishrika M. Pattaswamy
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Mark E. Burkard
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Department of Oncology/McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Beth A. Weaver
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Department of Oncology/McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lynch AR, Bradford S, Zhou AS, Oxendine K, Henderson L, Horner VL, Weaver BA, Burkard ME. A survey of CIN measures across mechanistic models. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.06.15.544840. [PMID: 37398147 PMCID: PMC10312700 DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.15.544840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
Chromosomal instability (CIN) is the persistent reshuffling of cancer karyotypes via chromosome mis-segregation during cell division. In cancer, CIN exists at varying levels that have differential effects on tumor progression. However, mis-segregation rates remain challenging to assess in human cancer despite an array of available measures. We evaluated measures of CIN by comparing quantitative methods using specific, inducible phenotypic CIN models of chromosome bridges, pseudobipolar spindles, multipolar spindles, and polar chromosomes. For each, we measured CIN fixed and timelapse fluorescence microscopy, chromosome spreads, 6-centromere FISH, bulk transcriptomics, and single cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq). As expected, microscopy of tumor cells in live and fixed samples correlated well (R=0.77; p<0.01) and sensitively detect CIN. Cytogenetics approaches include chromosome spreads and 6-centromere FISH, which also correlate well (R=0.77; p<0.01) but had limited sensitivity for lower rates of CIN. Bulk genomic DNA signatures and bulk transcriptomic scores, CIN70 and HET70, did not detect CIN. By contrast, single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq) detects CIN with high sensitivity, and correlates very well with imaging methods (R=0.83; p<0.01). In summary, single-cell methods such as imaging, cytogenetics, and scDNAseq can measure CIN, with the latter being the most comprehensive method accessible to clinical samples. To facilitate comparison of CIN rates between phenotypes and methods, we propose a standardized unit of CIN: Mis-segregations per Diploid Division (MDD). This systematic analysis of common CIN measures highlights the superiority of single-cell methods and provides guidance for measuring CIN in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R. Lynch
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Shermineh Bradford
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Amber S. Zhou
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Kim Oxendine
- Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Les Henderson
- Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Vanessa L. Horner
- Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Beth A. Weaver
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Mark E. Burkard
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Division of Hematology Oncology and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dhital B, Rodriguez-Bravo V. Mechanisms of chromosomal instability (CIN) tolerance in aggressive tumors: surviving the genomic chaos. Chromosome Res 2023; 31:15. [PMID: 37058263 PMCID: PMC10104937 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-023-09724-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a pervasive feature of human cancers involved in tumor initiation and progression and which is found elevated in metastatic stages. CIN can provide survival and adaptation advantages to human cancers. However, too much of a good thing may come at a high cost for tumor cells as excessive degree of CIN-induced chromosomal aberrations can be detrimental for cancer cell survival and proliferation. Thus, aggressive tumors adapt to cope with ongoing CIN and most likely develop unique susceptibilities that can be their Achilles' heel. Determining the differences between the tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing effects of CIN at the molecular level has become one of the most exciting and challenging aspects in cancer biology. In this review, we summarized the state of knowledge regarding the mechanisms reported to contribute to the adaptation and perpetuation of aggressive tumor cells carrying CIN. The use of genomics, molecular biology, and imaging techniques is significantly enhancing the understanding of the intricate mechanisms involved in the generation of and adaptation to CIN in experimental models and patients, which were not possible to observe decades ago. The current and future research opportunities provided by these advanced techniques will facilitate the repositioning of CIN exploitation as a feasible therapeutic opportunity and valuable biomarker for several types of human cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittiny Dhital
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Thomas Jefferson University Graduate School, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Veronica Rodriguez-Bravo
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cosper PF, Hrycyniak LCF, Paracha M, Lee DL, Wan J, Jones K, Bice SA, Nickel K, Mallick S, Taylor AM, Kimple RJ, Lambert PF, Weaver BA. HPV16 E6 induces chromosomal instability due to polar chromosomes caused by E6AP-dependent degradation of the mitotic kinesin CENP-E. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2216700120. [PMID: 36989302 PMCID: PMC10083562 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2216700120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Chromosome segregation during mitosis is highly regulated to ensure production of genetically identical progeny. Recurrent mitotic errors cause chromosomal instability (CIN), a hallmark of tumors. The E6 and E7 oncoproteins of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV), which causes cervical, anal, and head and neck cancers (HNC), cause mitotic defects consistent with CIN in models of anogenital cancers, but this has not been studied in the context of HNC. Here, we show that HPV16 induces a specific type of CIN in patient HNC tumors, patient-derived xenografts, and cell lines, which is due to defects in chromosome congression. These defects are specifically induced by the HPV16 oncogene E6 rather than E7. We show that HPV16 E6 expression causes degradation of the mitotic kinesin CENP-E, whose depletion produces chromosomes that are chronically misaligned near spindle poles (polar chromosomes) and fail to congress. Though the canonical oncogenic role of E6 is the degradation of the tumor suppressor p53, CENP-E degradation and polar chromosomes occur independently of p53. Instead, E6 directs CENP-E degradation in a proteasome-dependent manner via the E6-associated ubiquitin protein ligase E6AP/UBE3A. This study reveals a mechanism by which HPV induces CIN, which may impact HPV-mediated tumor initiation, progression, and therapeutic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pippa F. Cosper
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Laura C. F. Hrycyniak
- Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Maha Paracha
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Denis L. Lee
- Department of Oncology, McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Jun Wan
- Physiology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Kathryn Jones
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Sophie A. Bice
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI53705
| | - Kwangok Nickel
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Samyukta Mallick
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology at the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY10032
- Integrated Program in Cellular, Molecular, and Biomedical Studies, Columbia University, New York, NY10032
| | - Alison M. Taylor
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology at the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY10032
| | - Randall J. Kimple
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Paul F. Lambert
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
- Department of Oncology, McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
| | - Beth A. Weaver
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
- Department of Oncology, McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53705
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tucker JB, Bonema SC, García-Varela R, Denu RA, Hu Y, McGregor SM, Burkard ME, Weaver BA. Misaligned Chromosomes are a Major Source of Chromosomal Instability in Breast Cancer. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2023; 3:54-65. [PMID: 36968230 PMCID: PMC10035514 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-22-0302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Chromosomal instability (CIN), the persistent reshuffling of chromosomes during mitosis, is a hallmark of human cancers that contributes to tumor heterogeneity and has been implicated in driving metastasis and altering responses to therapy. Though multiple mechanisms can produce CIN, lagging chromosomes generated from abnormal merotelic attachments are the major cause of CIN in a variety of cell lines, and are expected to predominate in cancer. Here, we quantify CIN in breast cancer using a tumor microarray, matched primary and metastatic samples, and patient-derived organoids from primary breast cancer. Surprisingly, misaligned chromosomes are more common than lagging chromosomes and represent a major source of CIN in primary and metastatic tumors. This feature of breast cancers is conserved in a majority of breast cancer cell lines. Importantly, though a portion of misaligned chromosomes align before anaphase onset, the fraction that remain represents the largest source of CIN in these cells. Metastatic breast cancers exhibit higher rates of CIN than matched primary cancers, primarily due to increases in misaligned chromosomes. Whether CIN causes immune activation or evasion is controversial. We find that misaligned chromosomes result in immune-activating micronuclei substantially less frequently than lagging and bridge chromosomes and that breast cancers with greater frequencies of lagging chromosomes and chromosome bridges recruit more stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. These data indicate misaligned chromosomes represent a major mechanism of CIN in breast cancer and provide support for differential immunostimulatory effects of specific types of CIN. Significance We surveyed the single-cell landscape of mitotic defects that generate CIN in primary and metastatic breast cancer and relevant models. Misaligned chromosomes predominate, and are less immunostimulatory than other chromosome segregation errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John B. Tucker
- Cancer Biology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Sarah C. Bonema
- Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - Ryan A. Denu
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Yang Hu
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Stephanie M. McGregor
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Mark E. Burkard
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
- Department of Oncology/McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Beth A. Weaver
- Department of Oncology/McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lynch AR, Arp NL, Zhou AS, Weaver BA, Burkard ME. Quantifying chromosomal instability from intratumoral karyotype diversity using agent-based modeling and Bayesian inference. eLife 2022; 11:e69799. [PMID: 35380536 PMCID: PMC9054132 DOI: 10.7554/elife.69799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromosomal instability (CIN)-persistent chromosome gain or loss through abnormal mitotic segregation-is a hallmark of cancer that drives aneuploidy. Intrinsic chromosome mis-segregation rate, a measure of CIN, can inform prognosis and is a promising biomarker for response to anti-microtubule agents. However, existing methodologies to measure this rate are labor intensive, indirect, and confounded by selection against aneuploid cells, which reduces observable diversity. We developed a framework to measure CIN, accounting for karyotype selection, using simulations with various levels of CIN and models of selection. To identify the model parameters that best fit karyotype data from single-cell sequencing, we used approximate Bayesian computation to infer mis-segregation rates and karyotype selection. Experimental validation confirmed the extensive chromosome mis-segregation rates caused by the chemotherapy paclitaxel (18.5 ± 0.5/division). Extending this approach to clinical samples revealed that inferred rates fell within direct observations of cancer cell lines. This work provides the necessary framework to quantify CIN in human tumors and develop it as a predictive biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Lynch
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
| | - Nicholas L Arp
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
| | - Amber S Zhou
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
| | - Beth A Weaver
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of WisconsinMadisonUnited States
| | - Mark E Burkard
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- Division of Hematology Medical Oncology and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine University of WisconsinMadisonUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cosper PF, Copeland SE, Tucker JB, Weaver BA. Chromosome Missegregation as a Modulator of Radiation Sensitivity. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:54-63. [PMID: 34861996 PMCID: PMC8883596 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Chromosome missegregation over the course of multiple cell divisions, termed chromosomal instability (CIN), is a hallmark of cancer. Multiple causes of CIN have been identified, including defects in the mitotic checkpoint, altered kinetochore-microtubule dynamics, centrosome amplification, and ionizing radiation. Here we review the types, mechanisms, and cellular implications of CIN. We discuss the evidence that CIN can promote tumors, suppress them, or do neither, depending on the rates of chromosome missegregration and the cellular context. Very high rates of chromosome missegregation lead to cell death due to loss of essential chromosomes; thus elevating CIN above a tolerable threshold provides a mechanistic opportunity to promote cancer cell death. Lethal rates of CIN can be achieved by a single insult or through a combination of insults. Because ionizing radiation induces CIN, additional therapies that increase CIN may serve as useful modulators of radiation sensitivity. Ultimately, quantifying the intrinsic CIN in a tumor and modulating this level pharmacologically as well as with radiation may allow for a more rational, personalized radiation therapy prescription, thereby decreasing side effects and increasing local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pippa F. Cosper
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA,University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Sarah E. Copeland
- Molecular & Cellular Pharmacology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - John B. Tucker
- Cancer Biology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Beth A. Weaver
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA,Department of Cellular and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA,Department of Oncology/McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA,Corresponding author: Beth A. Weaver, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, 6109 WIMR Tower 1, Madison, WI 53705-2275, Phone: 608-263-5309, Fax: 608-265-6905,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Scribano CM, Wan J, Esbona K, Tucker JB, Lasek A, Zhou AS, Zasadil LM, Molini R, Fitzgerald J, Lager AM, Laffin JJ, Correia-Staudt K, Wisinski KB, Tevaarwerk AJ, O’Regan R, McGregor SM, Fowler AM, Chappell RJ, Bugni TS, Burkard ME, Weaver BA. Chromosomal instability sensitizes patient breast tumors to multipolar divisions induced by paclitaxel. Sci Transl Med 2021; 13:eabd4811. [PMID: 34516829 PMCID: PMC8612166 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abd4811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Paclitaxel (Taxol) is a cornerstone of cancer treatment. However, its mechanism of cytotoxicity is incompletely understood and not all patients benefit from treatment. We show that patients with breast cancer did not accumulate sufficient intratumoral paclitaxel to induce mitotic arrest in tumor cells. Instead, clinically relevant concentrations induced multipolar mitotic spindle formation. However, the extent of early multipolarity did not predict patient response. Whereas multipolar divisions frequently led to cell death, multipolar spindles focused into bipolar spindles before division at variable frequency, and maintaining multipolarity throughout mitosis was critical to induce the high rates of chromosomal instability necessary for paclitaxel to elicit cell death. Increasing multipolar divisions in paclitaxel resulted in improved cytotoxicity. Conversely, decreasing paclitaxel-induced multipolar divisions reduced paclitaxel efficacy. Moreover, we found that preexisting chromosomal instability sensitized breast cancer cells to paclitaxel. Both genetic and pharmacological methods of inducing chromosomal instability were sufficient to increase paclitaxel efficacy. In patients, the amount of pretreatment chromosomal instability directly correlated with taxane response in metastatic breast cancer such that patients with a higher rate of preexisting chromosomal instability showed improved response to taxanes. Together, these results support the use of baseline rates of chromosomal instability as a predictive biomarker for paclitaxel response. Furthermore, they suggest that agents that increase chromosomal instability or maintain multipolar spindles throughout mitosis will improve the clinical utility of paclitaxel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M. Scribano
- Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Jun Wan
- Physiology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Karla Esbona
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - John B. Tucker
- Cancer Biology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Amber Lasek
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Amber S. Zhou
- Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Lauren M. Zasadil
- Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Ryan Molini
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Jonathan Fitzgerald
- Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology Graduate Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Angela M. Lager
- Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | | | | | - Kari B. Wisinski
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | | | - Ruth O’Regan
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Stephanie M. McGregor
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Amy M. Fowler
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53792, USA
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | | | - Tim S. Bugni
- School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Mark E. Burkard
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
- Department of Oncology/McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Beth A. Weaver
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
- Department of Oncology/McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|