Targeting Epigenetics to Prevent Obesity Promoted Cancers

Subtype classification based on t cell proliferation-related regulator genes and risk model for predicting outcomes of lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), the major lung cancer histotype, represents 40% lung cancers. Currently, outcomes are remarkably different in LUAD patients with similar AJCC/UICC-TNM features. T cell proliferation-related regulator genes (TPRGs) relate to the proliferation, activity and function of T cells and tumor progression. The values of TPRGs in classifying LUAD patients and predicting outcomes remain unknown.

Methods

Gene expression profile and corresponding clinical data were downloaded from TCGA and the GEO databases. We systematically analyzed the expression profile characteristics of 35 TPRGs in LUAD patients and investigated the differences in overall survival (OS), biology pathway, immunity and somatic mutation between different TPRGs-related subtypes. Subsequently, we constructed a TPRGs-related risk model in TCGA cohort to quantify risk scores using LASSO cox regression analysis and then validated this risk model in two GEO cohorts. LUAD patients were divided into high- and low-risk subtypes according to the median risk score. We systematically compared the biology pathway, immunity, somatic mutation and drug susceptibility between the two risk subtypes. Finally, we validate biological functions of two TPRGs-encoded proteins (DCLRE1B and HOMER1) in LUAD cells A549.

Results

We identified different TPRGs-related subtypes (including cluster 1/cluster A and its counterpart cluster 2/cluster B). Compared to the cluster 1/cluster A subtype, cluster 2/cluster B subtype tended to have a prominent survival advantage with an immunosuppressive microenvironment and a higher somatic mutation frequency. Then, we constructed a TPRGs-related 6-gene risk model. The high-risk subtype characterized by higher somatic mutation frequency and lower immunotherapy response had a worse prognosis. This risk model was an independent prognostic factor and showed to be reliable and accurate for LUAD classification. Furthermore, subtypes with different risk scores were significantly associated with drug sensitivity. DCLRE1B and HOMER1 suppressed cell proliferation, migration and invasion in LUAD cells A549, which was in line with their prognostic values.

Conclusion

We construed a novel stratification model of LUAD based on TPRGs, which can accurately and reliably predict the prognosis and might be used as a predictive tool for LUAD patients.

Cancer and Obesity: An Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) 2022

Background

This Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) provides an overview of cancer and increased body fat.

Methods

The scientific information for this CPS is based upon published scientific citations, clinical perspectives of OMA authors, and peer review by the Obesity Medicine Association leadership.

Results

Topics include the increased risk of cancers among patients with obesity, cancer risk factor population-attributable fractions, genetic and epigenetic links between obesity and cancer, adiposopathic and mechanistic processes accounting for increased cancer risk among patients with obesity, the role of oxidative stress, and obesity-related cancers based upon Mendelian randomization and observational studies. Other topics include nutritional and physical activity principles for patients with obesity who either have cancer or are at risk for cancer, and preventive care as it relates to cancer and obesity.

Conclusions

Obesity is the second most common preventable cause of cancer and may be the most common preventable cause of cancer among nonsmokers. This Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) on cancer is one of a series of OMA CPSs designed to assist clinicians in the care of patients with the disease of obesity. Patients with obesity are at greater risk of developing certain types of cancers, and treatment of obesity may influence the risk, onset, progression, and recurrence of cancer in patients with obesity.

Ketotherapy as an epigenetic modifier in cancer

Epigenetic alterations in cancer play a variety of roles. Aberrant DNA methylation, as one of the epigenetic mechanisms, has been widely studied in both tumor and liquid biopsies and provide a useful bench mark for treatment response in cancer. Recently, several studies have reported an association between the type of diet and epigenetic modifications. Whereby there is a growing interest in finding the "anti-cancer diet formula", if such a thing exists. In this sense, ketogenic diets (KD) have reported potentially beneficial effects, which were able to prevent malignancies and decrease tumor growth. Some studies have even shown increased survival in cancer patients, reduced side effects of cytotoxic treatments, and intensified efficacy of cancer therapies. Although the biological mechanisms of KD are not well understood, it has been reported that KD may affect DNA methylation by modulating the expression of crucial genes involved in tumor survival and proliferation. However, there are many considerations to take into account to use ketotherapy in cancer, such as epigenetic mark, type of cancer, immunological and metabolic state or microbiota profile. In this review, we argue about ketotherapy as a potential strategy to consider as coadjuvant of cancer therapy. We will focus on mainly epigenetic mechanisms and dietary approach that could be included in the current clinical practice guidelines.

Impact of bariatric surgery on cancer risk reduction

Obesity is second only to tobacco as a preventable cause of cancer in the US. By multifactorial and often additive mechanisms, obesity leads to the development and promotion of 40% of the cancers diagnosed in this country, including post-menopausal breast, endometrial, colorectal, kidney, liver and pancreatic cancers, among others. Though prevention of obesity should be the ultimate goal of thoughtful and effective healthcare practices, it remains a highly prevalent condition, and morbid obesity (BMI ≥40 Kg/m²) can be refractory to lifestyle interventions in many cases. Currently bariatric surgery is an effective treatment strategy for individuals who suffer from morbid obesity or obesity with associated co-morbidities and fail to lose weight under a medically supervised diet and exercise program. The current review addresses seminal studies that have investigated the potential cancer prevention effects of bariatric surgery, demonstrating a positive impact mostly in post-menopausal breast and endometrial cancers. The controversial association between bariatric surgery and increased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk is also recognized and discussed. Finally, while bariatric surgery should not be routinely recommended as a cancer prevention strategy, it has the potential to decrease the risk for certain types of cancers as a collateral beneficial effect.

Obesity Surgery and Cancer: What Are the Unanswered Questions?

Obesity has become a global epidemic with a soaring economic encumbrance due to its related morbidity and mortality. Amongst obesity-related conditions, cancer is indeed the most redoubtable. Bariatric surgery has been proven to be the most effective treatment for obesity and its associated metabolic and cardiovascular disorders. However, the understanding of whether and how bariatric surgery determines a reduction in cancer risk is limited. Obesity-related malignancies primarily include colorectal and hormone-sensitive (endometrium, breast, prostate) cancers. Additionally, esophago-gastric tumors are growing to be recognized as a new category mainly associated with post-bariatric surgery outcomes. In fact, certain types of surgical procedures have been described to induce the development and subsequent progression of pre-cancerous esophageal and gastric lesions. This emerging category is of great concern and further research is required to possibly prevent such risks. Published data has generated conflicting results. In fact, while overall cancer risk reduction was reported particularly in women, some authors showed no improvement or even increased cancer incidence. Although various studies have reported beneficial effects of surgery on risk of specific cancer development, fundamental insights into the pathogenesis of obesity-related cancer are indispensable to fully elucidate its mechanisms.

Novel SFRP2 DNA Methylation Profile Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Different Grades of BMI

The relationship between body weight and different cancers is now well-recognized and among such cancers, colorectal cancer (CRC) is reported most frequently. Our group recently published findings, through an epigenome-wide association study, suggesting that body mass index (BMI) could act as a relevant risk factor in the CRC. In addition, aberrant SFRP2 methylation is one of the major mechanisms for Wnt signaling activation in CRC. Conversely, neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy appears to alter the rectal cancer epigenome. This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of obesity, measured by BMI, on the methylation of SFRP2 in tumor samples of patients with CRC. Non-treated CRC patients and CRC patients treated with pre-operative neoadjuvant therapy from 2011 to 2013 were included and classified by BMI < 25.0 kg/m² and BMI > 25.0 kg/m². SFRP2 DNA methylation in tumor samples was measured by pyrosequencing. Our findings suggest a possible interaction between SFRP2 methylation levels and BMI in CRC tumor samples. The correlation of SFRP2 hypomethylation with an elevated BMI was stronger within the non-treated CRC patient group than within the treated CRC patient group. We have successfully demonstrated that the beneficial association of tumor SFRP2 hypomethylation is dependent on patient BMI in non-treated CRC, suggesting a possible tumor suppressor role for SFRP2 in overweight and obese patients. Additional studies of clinical pathologies would be necessary to strengthen these preliminary results.

Long Non-Coding RNAs in Obesity-Induced Cancer

Many mechanisms of obesity-induced cancers have been proposed. However, it remains unclear whether or not long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play any role in obesity-induced cancers. In this article, we briefly discuss the generally accepted hypotheses explaining the mechanisms of obesity-induced cancers, summarize the latest evidence for the expression of a number of well-known cancer-associated lncRNAs in obese subjects, and propose the potential contribution of lncRNAs to obesity-induced cancers. We hope this review can serve as an inspiration to scientists to further explore the regulatory roles of lncRNAs in the development of obesity-induced cancers. Those findings will be fundamental in the development of effective therapeutics or interventions to combat this life-threatening adverse effect of obesity.