Targeting WEE1/AKT restores p53-dependent NK cell activation to induce immune checkpoint blockade responses in 'cold' melanoma

The 29th Annual Prostate Cancer Foundation Scientific Retreat Report

BACKGROUND

The 29th Annual Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) Scientific Retreat was held from October 27 to 29, 2022, at the Omni La Costa Resort in Carlsbad, CA. This was the first-ever hybrid PCF Retreat.

METHODS

The Annual PCF Scientific Retreat is a prominent international scientific gathering centered on groundbreaking, unpublished, and influential studies in basic, translational, and clinical prostate cancer research. It also covers research from related fields with a strong potential for influencing prostate cancer research and patient care.

RESULTS

Key areas of research that were focused on at the 2022 PCF Retreat included: (i) the contributions of molecular and genomic factors to prostate cancer disparities; (ii) novel clinical trial updates; (iii) lessons from primary prostate cancer; (iv) lessons from single-cell studies; (v) genetic, epigenetic, epitranscriptomic and posttranslational mechanisms and clinical heterogeneity in prostate cancer; (vi) biology of neuroendocrine and lineage-plastic prostate cancer; (vii) next generation prostate cancer theranostics and combination therapies; (viii) the biology and therapeutic potential of targeting phosphoinositide 3-kinases pathways; (ix) combining immunomodulatory treatments for prostate cancer; (x) novel gamma delta (γδ) T-cell therapy platforms for oncology; and (xi) lessons from other cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

This article provides a summary of the presentations from the 2022 PCF Scientific Retreat. By disseminating this knowledge, we hope to enhance our understanding of the present research landscape and guide future strides in both prostate cancer research and patient care.

NK cell-based tumor immunotherapy

Natural killer (NK) cells display a unique inherent ability to identify and eliminate virus-infected cells and tumor cells. They are particularly powerful for elimination of hematological cancers, and have attracted considerable interests for therapy of solid tumors. However, the treatment of solid tumors with NK cells are less effective, which can be attributed to the very complicated immunosuppressive microenvironment that may lead to the inactivation, insufficient expansion, short life, and the poor tumor infiltration of NK cells. Fortunately, the development of advanced nanotechnology has provided potential solutions to these issues, and could improve the immunotherapy efficacy of NK cells. In this review, we summarize the activation and inhibition mechanisms of NK cells in solid tumors, and the recent advances in NK cell-based tumor immunotherapy boosted by diverse nanomaterials. We also propose the challenges and opportunities for the clinical application of NK cell-based tumor immunotherapy.

Adavosertib and beyond: Biomarkers, drug combination and toxicity of WEE1 inhibitors

WEE1 kinase is renowned as an S-G2 checkpoint inhibitor activated by ATR-CHK1 in response to replication stress. WEE1 inhibition enhances replication stress and effectively circumvents checkpoints into mitosis, which triggers significant genetic impairs and culminates in cell death. This approach has been validated clinically for its promising anti-tumor efficacy across various cancer types, notably in cases of ovarian cancers. Nonetheless, the initial stage of clinical trials has shown that the first-in-human WEE1 inhibitor adavosertib is limited by dose-limiting adverse events. As a result, recent efforts have been made to explore predictive biomarkers and smart combination schedules to alleviate adverse effects. In this review, we focused on the exploration of therapeutic biomarkers, as well as schedules of combination utilizing WEE1 inhibitors and canonical anticancer drugs, according to the latest preclinical and clinical studies, indicating that the optimal application of WEE1 inhibitors will likely be as part of dose-reducing combination and be tailored to specific patient populations.

Chitosan nanomedicine containing RGD peptide and PAD4 inhibitor based on phenyl boronate coupling inhibition of primary tumor growth and lung metastasis

Stimulus-responsive nanodrugs have been extensively studied and their structural changes in the cells are important for controlled intracellular drug release. Histone citrullination of peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) regulates the expression of tumor suppressor genes. In our previous study, compounds such as YW3-56 (356) were developed as potent PAD4 inhibitors with excellent anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo. To enhance the antitumor activity and improve the bioavailability, we further optimized the structure by modifying the phenylboronic acid moiety to the PAD4 inhibitor (4B). Taking advantage of the oxidative stress responsiveness of the phenylboronic acid moiety, in this study, we covalently attached 4B to RGD sequence peptide modified chitosan (K-CRGDV) to construct this new oxidative stress responsive nanodrug (K-CRGDV-4B). The modification of RGD sequence peptide conferred the nanodrug the ability to actively target tumors. The release mechanism was verified by UV-Vis spectroscopy, NMR. The anti-tumor and anti-metastatic properties of K-CRGDV-4B were demonstrated by in vitro cytotoxicity assay and in vivo mouse Lewis lung cancer metastasis model. In addition, K-CRGDV-4B modulates the ratio of immune cells in LLC tumor-bearing mice. Immunosuppressive proteins such as PD1 were inhibited, while IFN-γ and IFN-β, which are stimulators of tumor immune responses, were upregulated. Overall, K-CRGDV-4B is a stimulus-responsive nanodrug that responds to the tumor microenvironment by inhibiting PAD4 activity, blocking the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and improving the tumor immune microenvironment.

The DNA Damage Response and Inflammation in Cancer

Genomic stability in normal cells is crucial to avoid oncogenesis. Accordingly, multiple components of the DNA damage response (DDR) operate as bona fide tumor suppressor proteins by preserving genomic stability, eliciting the demise of cells with unrepairable DNA lesions, and engaging cell-extrinsic oncosuppression via immunosurveillance. That said, DDR sig-naling can also favor tumor progression and resistance to therapy. Indeed, DDR signaling in cancer cells has been consistently linked to the inhibition of tumor-targeting immune responses. Here, we discuss the complex interactions between the DDR and inflammation in the context of oncogenesis, tumor progression, and response to therapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

Accumulating preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that DDR is intimately connected to the emission of immunomodulatory signals by normal and malignant cells, as part of a cell-extrinsic program to preserve organismal homeostasis. DDR-driven inflammation, however, can have diametrically opposed effects on tumor-targeting immunity. Understanding the links between the DDR and inflammation in normal and malignant cells may unlock novel immunotherapeutic paradigms to treat cancer.

The mechanism and clinical application of DNA damage repair inhibitors combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of urologic cancer

Urologic cancers such as kidney, bladder, prostate, and uroepithelial cancers have recently become a considerable global health burden, and the response to immunotherapy is limited due to immune escape and immune resistance. Therefore, it is crucial to find appropriate and effective combination therapies to improve the sensitivity of patients to immunotherapy. DNA damage repair inhibitors can enhance the immunogenicity of tumor cells by increasing tumor mutational burden and neoantigen expression, activating immune-related signaling pathways, regulating PD-L1 expression, and reversing the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment to activate the immune system and enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. Based on promising experimental results from preclinical studies, many clinical trials combining DNA damage repair inhibitors (e.g., PARP inhibitors and ATR inhibitors) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) are underway in patients with urologic cancers. Results from several clinical trials have shown that the combination of DNA damage repair inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors can improve objective rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) in patients with urologic tumors, especially in patients with defective DNA damage repair genes or a high mutational load. In this review, we present the results of preclinical and clinical trials of different DNA damage repair inhibitors in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in urologic cancers and summarize the potential mechanism of action of the combination therapy. Finally, we also discuss the challenges of dose toxicity, biomarker selection, drug tolerance, drug interactions in the treatment of urologic tumors with this combination therapy and look into the future direction of this combination therapy.

An Immunogenic Cell Death-Related Gene Signature Reflects Immune Landscape and Predicts Prognosis in Melanoma Independently of BRAF V600E Status

Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is a type of regulated cell death that can activate adaptive immune response, and its ability to reshape the tumor microenvironment via multiple mechanisms may contribute to immunotherapy. The treatment options for patients with skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) vary based on BRAF V600E statuses. However, all standard treatments include immunotherapy. Therefore, it is critical to identify ICD-associated signatures that can help classify patients according to benefits from ICD immunotherapy. In this study, data on melanoma samples with BRAF V600E mutation (BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma) and melanoma samples with wild-type BRAF V600E alleles (BRAF V600E WT melanoma) were collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The ICD-related (ICD-high and ICD-low) subgroups of patients with BRAF V600E WT melanoma were established via consensus clustering. The analyses of survival, differentially expressed genes (DEGs), functional annotation, and immune landscape were performed in these two subgroups. Results showed that ICD-high subgroup was correlated with a positive overall survival (OS) and active tumor immune landscape. A model comprising seven prognosis ICD-related gene biomarkers was developed. Survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve evaluation in both cohorts with BRAF V600E WT and BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma showed an accurate prognostic estimation of ICD-related risk signature. There was a correlation between immune cell infiltration and immunotherapy response and risk score. Thus, the ICD risk signature was closely associated with the tumor's immune microenvironment. Our results may provide insights to further individualize and improve precision therapeutic decision-making in BRAF V600E-mutant and WT melanoma.

Upregulated miR-322-5p regulates cell cycle and promotes cell proliferation and apoptosis by directly targeting Wee1 in mice liver injury

Liver injury from any number of causes (e.g. chemical material, drugs and diet, viral infection) is a global health problem, and its mechanism is not clearly understood. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) expression profiling is gaining popularity because miRNAs, as key regulators in gene expression networks, can influence many biological processes and have also shown promise as biomarkers for disease. Previous studies reported the regulation effects of miRNAs in liver injury, whereas function and molecular mechanisms of miR-322-5p were still unclear. Therefore, our study focused on the biological role of miR-322-5p in carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced liver injury proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle. A mouse model of CCl4-induced liver injury was established, and the transcriptomes and miRNAs transcriptomes of 2d and 5d liver tissues after injury were sequenced. The expression of miR-322-5p and the cell cycle genes were detected in liver tissues and Hepa1-6 cell line by miRNA RT-PCR, qRT-PCR. The effects of miR-322-5p on liver cell proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis were evaluated using MTS assays and flow cytometry analysis. The relationship between miR-322-5p and Wee1 was predicted and confirmed by bioinformatics analysis and a dual luciferase reporter assay. Functional experiments, including an MTS assay and flow cytometric analysis, were performed to study the effects of Wee1. MiR-322-5p was upregulated in injury liver tissues, and downregulated miR-322-5p was proved to inhibit proliferation, apoptosis and arrest cell cycle at G2/M in vitro. The dual-luciferase reporter assay results indicated that miR-322-5p has a binding site at position 285 in the Wee1 3´UTR. The effects of miR-322-5p in proliferation and cell cycle regulation can be abolished by Wee1 through rescue experiments. By directly targeting Wee1 influenced the expression of several cell cycle factors, including Cyclin dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1), cyclin B1 (Ccnb1) and Cell division cyclin 25C (Cdc25C). MiR-322-5p may function as a suppressive factor by negatively controlling Wee1, thus, highlighting the potential role of miR-322-5p as a therapeutic target for liver injury.Abbreviations: ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; GSH: Glutathione, γ-glutamyl cysteinel + glycine; CCl4: Carbon tetrachloride; HE: Haematoxylin and eosin; KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

Combining inhibition of immune checkpoints and PARP: rationale and perspectives in cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Genomic instability resulting from the inability of cells to repair DNA damage is a breeding ground for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted treatments. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) interfere with the efficient repair of DNA single-strand break damage inducing, mainly in tumors with existing defects in double strand DNA repair system, synthetic lethality.

AREAS COVERED

By amplifying the DNA damage and inducing immunogenic cell death PARPi leads tumor neoantigens to increase, upregulation of programmed death-ligand 1, and modulation of the tumor microenvironment facilitating a more intense antitumor immune response. In this review, we reported the immunological role of PARPi and the rational use of the combination with ICIs, evaluating data from combination clinical trials and discussing perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Several prospective combination studies to overcome existing limitations to PARPi and ICI single agents are currently ongoing. The identification of the different resistance mechanisms to PARPi and ICI as well as the development of accurate and predictive biomarkers of response should be a priority to identify the patients who may most benefit from this combination. Similarly, clarifying the role and interaction between the DNA damage repair pathways and the tumor immune microenvironment would increase success of the combination.

Significance of immunogenic cell death-related genes in prognosis prediction and immune microenvironment landscape of patients with cutaneous melanoma

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is one of the most life-threatening tumors. Although targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved patient outcomes over the past decades, they still have their efficacy limitations. Immunogenic cell death (ICD) induces regulated cell death through immunogenic signal secretion and exposure. Accumulated evidence suggests that the ICD process is an effective target for the treatment of a variety of tumor types, including CM. However, the research on ICD in CM is far from complete, and its clinical value has not been widely concerned. By analyzing the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, we constructed a new risk model based on 4 ICD-related genes and validated its ability to predict the prognosis of CM patients. In addition, we comprehensively analyzed the tumor microenvironment (TME) of CM patients and showed a significant immunosuppressive TME in the high-risk group compared with the low-risk group. By Immunophenoscore (IPS), we further explored the correlation between the model and immunotherapy response. The data of Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database were further extracted to analyze drug sensitivity and evaluate its correlation with the established risk model. In the end, differential expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed by Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) to preliminarily explore the possible signaling pathways related to the prognosis of ICD and CM. The results of this study provide new perspectives and insights for individualized and accurate treatment strategies for CM patients.

Chimeric Oncolytic Adenovirus Armed Chemokine Rantes for Treatment of Breast Cancer

The immunosuppressive state in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of breast cancer makes it difficult to treat with immunotherapy. Oncolytic viruses not only lyse tumor cells but also reshape the TME. Therefore, they can play a multi-mechanism synergistic effect with immunotherapy. In this study, an oncolytic adenovirus Ad5F11bSP-Rantes was constructed and used as a vector to express the chemokine Rantes. The objective of this study was to test the dual mechanisms of the oncolytic effect mediated by virus replication and the enhanced anticancer immune response mediated by Rantes chemotaxis of immune cells. It was found that Ad5F11bSP-Rantes has strong infectivity and effective killing activity against breast cancer cells. In the established triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) xenograft model in NCG mice whose immune system was humanized with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), Ad5F11bSP-Rantes achieved 88.33% tumor inhibition rate. Rantes expression was high in mouse blood, a large number of CD3+ lymphocytes infiltrated in tumor tissues and E-cadherin was up-regulated in cancer cells, suggesting that Ad5F11bSP-Rantes altered the TME and induced a reversal of cancer cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). In conclusion, oncolytic adenovirus can exert the oncolytic effect and the chemotactic effect of immune cells and realize the synergy of multiple anticancer effects. This strategy creates a candidate treatment for the optimization of breast cancer, especially TNBC, combination therapy.