SWI/SNF Complex Genomic Alterations as a Predictive Biomarker for Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Multiple Cancers

Molecular mechanisms of Hippo pathway in tumorigenesis: therapeutic implications

The Hippo signaling pathway is a pivotal regulator of tissue homeostasis, organ size, and cell proliferation. Its dysregulation is profoundly implicated in various forms of cancer, making it a highly promising target for therapeutic intervention. This review extensively evaluates the mechanisms underlying the dysregulation of the Hippo pathway in cancer cells and the molecular processes linking these alterations to tumorigenesis. Under normal physiological conditions, the Hippo pathway is a guardian, ensuring controlled cellular proliferation and programmed cell death. However, numerous mutations and epigenetic modifications can disrupt this equilibrium in cancer cells, leading to unchecked cell proliferation, enhanced survival, and metastatic capabilities. The pathway's interaction with other critical signaling networks, including Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/Akt, TGF-β/SMAD, and EGFR pathways, further amplifies its oncogenic potential. Central to these disruptions is the activation of YAP and TAZ transcriptional coactivators, which drive the expression of genes that promote oncogenesis. This review delves into the molecular mechanisms responsible for the dysregulation of the Hippo pathway in cancer, elucidating how these disruptions contribute to tumorigenesis. We also explore potential therapeutic strategies, including inhibitors targeting YAP/TAZ activity and modulators of upstream signaling components. Despite significant advancements in understanding the Hippo pathway's role in cancer, numerous questions remain unresolved. Continued research is imperative to unravel the complex interactions within this pathway and to develop innovative and effective therapies for clinical application. In conclusion, the comprehensive understanding of the Hippo pathway's regulatory mechanisms offers significant potential for advancing cancer therapies, regenerative medicine, and treatments for chronic diseases. The translation of these insights into clinical practice will necessitate collaborative efforts from researchers, clinicians, and pharmaceutical developers to bring novel and effective therapies to patients, ultimately improving clinical outcomes and advancing the field of oncology.

SMARCB1/INI-1-Deficient sinonasal carcinoma demonstrates a poor prognosis but favorable clinical outcomes after PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy: A case series

Despite advances in multimodal cancer therapy, such as combining radical surgery with high-intensity chemoradiotherapy, for SMARCB1/INI-1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma (SDSC), the prognosis of patients remains poor. Immunotherapy is gaining increasing popularity as a novel treatment strategy for patients with SMARCB1/INI-1-deficient tumors. Herein, we report on the management of three patients with SDSC who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy as a part of multimodal therapy based on surgery and chemoradiotherapy. All three patients survived and demonstrated good clinical remission and disease control. To our knowledge, this is the first case series reporting the use of immunotherapy to improve clinical outcomes in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and late first-line stages of treatment in patients with SDSC. Furthermore, we reviewed the relevant literature and further explored the correlation between SMARCB1/INI-1 deletion and immunotherapy.

SMARCA4 mutations and expression in lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic significance and impact on the immunotherapy response

The switch/sucrose non-fermenting (SWI/SNF) complex family includes important chromatin-remodeling factors that are frequently mutated in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, the role of one family member, SMARCA4, in LUAD prognosis and immunotherapy sensitivity remains unclear. In the present study, 6745 LUAD samples from the cBioPortal database were used to analyze the relationships between SMARCA4 mutations and patient prognoses and clinical characteristics. Additionally, we examined the correlation between SMARCA4 mutations and prognosis in patients treated with immunotherapy using two immune-related datasets. SMARCA4 mutations and low expression were associated with shorter survival, and mutations were associated with a high tumor mutational burden and high microsatellite instability. SMARCA4 mutations were accompanied by KRAS, KEAP1, TP53 and STK11 mutations. No significant difference was observed in the immunotherapy response between patients with and without SMARCA4 mutations. When KRAS or STK11 mutations were present, immunotherapy effectiveness was poorer; however, when both SMARCA4 and TP53 mutations were present, immunotherapy was more effective. Furthermore, low SMARCA4 expression predicted a higher immunophenoscore, and SMARCA4 expression was correlated with certain immune microenvironment features. Taken together, our results suggest that SMARCA4 mutations and low expression might be associated with poor LUAD prognosis. Additionally, immunotherapy efficacy in patients with SMARCA4 mutations depended on the co-mutant genes. Thus, SMARCA4 could be an important factor to be considered for LUAD diagnosis and treatment.

SMARCA4 Deficient Gastric Carcinoma With Squamous Differentiation in a Young Patient With Aggressive Clinical Course

Inactivation of SMARCA4 (BRG1), a subunit of SWI/SNF complex, has been reported in malignancies from various sites, including the thorax, uterus, ovary, and gastrointestinal tract, and is usually associated with aggressive clinical course. These tumors have been reported primarily in elderly patients and on histology demonstrate high-grade morphology, often with rhabdoid differentiation. SMARCA4 loss is exceedingly rare in primary gastric cancers. Here, we present a unique example of SMARCA4 deficient gastric carcinoma in a 28-year-old male patient with molecular confirmation which showed a poorly differentiated histology and focal squamous differentiation. Despite multidisciplinary management, including FOLFOX chemotherapy, immunotherapy (nivolumab), and surgical resection, the patient succumbed to his disease within 2 years of diagnosis. This case report highlights the aggressive nature of SMARCA4-deficient carcinomas, which are often resistant to conventional chemotherapy, and underscores the importance of early diagnosis and exploring alternative therapeutic approaches for such malignancies.

SWI/SNF Complex-Deficient Undifferentiated Carcinoma of the Pancreas: Clinicopathologic and Genomic Analysis

Inactivating alterations in the SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable (SWI/SNF) Chromatin Remodeling Complex subunits have been described in multiple tumor types. Recent studies focused on SMARC subunits of this complex to understand their relationship with tumor characteristics and therapeutic opportunities. To date, pancreatic cancer with these alterations has not been well studied, although isolated cases of undifferentiated carcinomas have been reported. Herein, we screened 59 pancreatic undifferentiated carcinomas for alterations in SWI/SNF complex-related (SMARCB1 [BAF47/INI1], SMARCA4 [BRG1], SMARCA2 [BRM]) proteins and/or genes using immunohistochemistry and/or next-generation sequencing. Cases with alterations in SWI/SNF complex-related proteins/genes were compared with cases without alterations, as well as with 96 conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC). In all tumor groups, mismatch repair and PD-L1 protein expression were also evaluated. Thirty of 59 (51%) undifferentiated carcinomas had a loss of SWI/SNF complex-related protein expression or gene alteration. Twenty-seven of 30 (90%) SWI-/SNF-deficient undifferentiated carcinomas had rhabdoid morphology (vs 9/29 [31%] SWI-/SNF-retained undifferentiated carcinomas; P < .001) and all expressed cytokeratin, at least focally. Immunohistochemically, SMARCB1 protein expression was absent in 16/30 (53%) cases, SMARCA2 in 4/30 (13%), and SMARCA4 in 4/30 (13%); both SMARCB1 and SMARCA2 protein expressions were absent in 1/30 (3%). Five of 8 (62.5%) SWI-/SNF-deficient undifferentiated carcinomas that displayed loss of SMARCB1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry were found to have corresponding SMARCB1 deletions by next-generation sequencing. Analysis of canonical driver mutations for PDAC in these cases showed KRAS (2/5) and TP53 (2/5) abnormalities. Median combined positive score for PD-L1 (E1L3N) was significantly higher in the undifferentiated carcinomas with/without SWI/SNF deficiency compared with the conventional PDACs (P < .001). SWI-/SNF-deficient undifferentiated carcinomas were larger (P < .001) and occurred in younger patients (P < .001). Patients with SWI-/SNF-deficient undifferentiated carcinoma had worse overall survival compared with patients with SWI-/SNF-retained undifferentiated carcinoma (P = .004) and PDAC (P < .001). Our findings demonstrate that SWI-/SNF-deficient pancreatic undifferentiated carcinomas are frequently characterized by rhabdoid morphology, exhibit highly aggressive behavior, and have a negative prognostic impact. The ones with SMARCB1 deletions appear to be frequently KRAS wild type. Innovative developmental therapeutic strategies targeting this genomic basis of the SWI/SNF complex and the therapeutic implications of EZH2 inhibition (NCT03213665), SMARCA2 degrader (NCT05639751), or immunotherapy are currently under investigation.

SWI/SNF family mutations in advanced NSCLC: genetic characteristics and immune checkpoint inhibitors' therapeutic implication

BACKGROUND

SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable (SWI/SNF) mutations have garnered increasing attention because of their association with unfavorable prognosis. However, the genetic landscape of SWI/SNF family mutations in Chinese non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is poorly understood. In addition, the optimal treatment strategy has not yet been determined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected sequencing data on 2027 lung tumor samples from multiple centers in China to comprehensively analyze the genomic characteristics of the SWI/SNF family within the Chinese NSCLC population. Meanwhile, 519 patients with NSCLC from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were enrolled to investigate the potential implications of immunotherapy on patients with SWI/SNF mutations and to identify beneficial subpopulations. We also validated our findings in multiple publicly available cohorts.

RESULTS

Approximately 15% of Chinese patients with lung cancer harbored mutations in the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, which were mutually exclusive to the EGFR mutations. Patients with SWI/SNFmut NSCLC who received first-line chemoimmunotherapy had better survival outcomes than those who received chemotherapy alone (median progression-free survival: 8.70 versus 6.93 months; P = 0.028). This finding was also confirmed by external validation using the POPLAR/OAK cohort. SWI/SNFmut NSCLC is frequently characterized by high tumor mutational burden and concurrent TP53 or STK11/KEAP mutations. Further analysis indicated that TP53 and STK11/KEAP1 mutations could be stratifying factors in facilitating personalized immunotherapy and guiding patient selection.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a step forward in understanding the genetic and immunological characterization of SWI/SNF genetic alterations. Moreover, our study reveals substantial benefits of immunotherapy over chemotherapy for SWI/SNF-mutant patients, especially the SWI/SNFmut and TP53mut subgroups.

ARID2 mutations may relay a distinct subset of cutaneous melanoma patients with different outcomes

ARID genes encode subunits of SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes and are frequently mutated in human cancers. We investigated the correlation between ARID mutations, molecular features, and clinical outcomes in melanoma patients. Cutaneous melanoma samples (n = 1577) were analyzed by next-generation sequencing. Samples were stratified by pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutation in ARID genes (ARID1A/2/1B/5B). PD-L1 expression was assessed using IHC (SP142; positive (+): ≥ 1%). Tumor mutation burden (TMB)-high was defined as ≥ 10 mutations/Mb. Transcriptomic signatures predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors-interferon gamma and T-cell inflamed score were calculated. Real-world overall survival (OS) information was obtained from insurance claims data, with Kaplan-Meier estimates calculated from time of tissue collection until last date of contact. Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, and Fisher exact tests were applied where appropriate, with p values adjusted for multiple comparisons. ARID2 mutations were more prevalent in cutaneous melanoma compared to ARID1A (11.0%: n = 451 vs 2.8%: n = 113), with concurrent ARID1A/ARID2 mutation in 1.1% (n = 46) of samples. ARID mutations were associated with a high prevalence of RAS pathway mutations-NF1 (ARID1A, 52.6%; ARID2, 48.5%; ARID1A/2, 63.6%; and ARID-WT, 13.3%; p < 0.0001) and KRAS (ARID1A, 3.5%; ARID2, 3.1%; ARID1A/2, 6.5%; and ARID-WT, 1.0%; p = 0.018)), although BRAF mutations were less common in ARID-mutated cohorts (ARID1A, 31.9%; ARID2, 35.6%; ARID1A/2, 26.1%; and ARID-WT, 50.4%; p < 0.0001). TMB-high was more common in ARID-mutated samples (ARID1A, 80.9%; ARID2, 89.9%; ARID1A/2, 100%; and ARID-WT, 49.4%; p < 0.0001), while PD-L1 positivity was similar across subgroups (ARID1A, 43.8%; ARID2, 51.1%; ARID1A/2, 52.5%; and ARID-WT, 44.9%; p = 0.109). Patients with ARID1A mutations had a higher prevalence of dMMR/MSI-H compared to those with ARID-WT (2.7% vs 0.2%, p = 0.030). Median IFN-γ and T-cell signatures were higher in ARID2-mutated samples compared to ARID-WT (IFN-γ: - 0.15 vs - 0.21, p = 0.0066; T-cell: 23.5 vs - 18.5, p = 0.041). ARID2-mutated patients had improved survival compared to ARID-WT; (HR: 1.22 (95% CI 1.0-1.5), p = 0.022). No additional OS benefit was observed with anti-PD-1 therapy for ARID2 mutation compared to ARID-WT. Melanoma patients with ARID mutations exhibited higher prevalence of markers associated with ICI response, including TMB-H, and immune-related signatures. Our data also suggests improved survival outcome in patients with ARID2 mutations, irrespective of anti-PD1 therapy.

SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study

The SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) complex is a multimeric protein involved in transcription regulation and DNA damage repair. SWI/SNF complex abnormalities are observed in approximately 14-34 % of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). Herein, we evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of a subset of the SWI/SNF complex proteins (ARID1A, SMARCA4/BRG1, SMARCA2/BRM, and SMARCB1/INI1) within our PDAC tissue microarray to determine whether SWI/SNF loss is associated with any clinicopathologic features or patient survival in PDAC. In our cohort, 13 of 353 (3.7 %) PDACs showed deficient SWI/SNF complex expression, which included 11 (3.1 %) with ARID1A loss, 1 (0.3 %) with SMARCA4/BRG1 loss, and 1 (0.3 %) with SMARCA2/BRM loss. All cases were SMARCB1/INI1 proficient. The SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs were more frequently identified in older patients with a mean age of 71.6 years (SD = 7.78) compared to the SWI/SNF-proficient PDACs which occurred at a mean age of 65.2 years (SD = 10.95) (P = 0.013). The SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs were associated with higher histologic grade, compared to the SWI/SNF-proficient PDACs (P = 0.029). No other significant clinicopathologic differences were noted between SWI/SNF-deficient and SWI/SNF-proficient PDACs. On follow-up, no significant differences were seen for overall survival and progression-free survival between SWI/SNF-deficient and SWI/SNF-proficient PDACs (both with P > 0.05). In summary, SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs most frequently demonstrate ARID1A loss. SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs are associated with older age and higher histologic grade. No other significant associations among other clinicopathologic parameters were seen in SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs including survival.

A novel biomarker associated with EBV infection improves response prediction of immunotherapy in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Novel biomarkers are required in gastric cancer (GC) treated by immunotherapy. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection induces an immune-active tumor microenvironment, while its association with immunotherapy response is still controversial. Genes underlying EBV infection may determine the response heterogeneity of EBV + GC. Thus, we screened hub genes associated with EBV infection to predict the response to immunotherapy in GC.

METHODS

Prognostic hub genes associated with EBV infection were screened using multi-omic data of GC. EBV + GC cells were established and confirmed by EBV-encoded small RNA in situ hybridization (EBER-ISH). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of the hub genes was conducted in GC samples with EBER-ISH assay. Infiltrating immune cells were stained using immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

CHAF1A was identified as a hub gene in EBV + GC, and its expression was an independent predictor of overall survival (OS). EBV infection up-regulated CHAF1A expression which also predicted EBV infection well. CHAF1A expression also predicted microsatellite instability (MSI) and a high tumor mutation burden (TMB). The combined score (CS) of CHAF1A expression with MSI or TMB further improved prognostic stratification. CHAF1A IHC score positively correlated with the infiltration of NK cells and macrophages M1. CHAF1A expression alone could predict the immunotherapy response, but its CS with EBV infection, MSI, TMB, or PD-L1 expression showed better effects and improved response stratification based on current biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

CHAF1A could be a novel biomarker for immunotherapy of GC, with the potential to improve the efficacy of existing biomarkers.

An oncogene regulating chromatin favors response to immunotherapy: Oncogene CHAF1A and immunotherapy outcomes

Many biological processes related to cell function and fate begin with chromatin alterations, and many factors associated with the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are actually downstream events of chromatin alterations, such as genome changes, neoantigen production, and immune checkpoint expression. However, the influence of genes as chromatin regulators on the efficacy of ICIs remains elusive, especially in gastric cancer (GC). In this study, thirty out of 1593 genes regulating chromatin associated with a favorable prognosis were selected for GC. CHAF1A, a well-defined oncogene, was identified as the highest linkage hub gene. High CHAF1A expression were associated with microsatellite instability (MSI), high tumor mutation burden (TMB), high tumor neoantigen burden (TNB), high expressions of PD-L1 and immune effector genes, and live infiltration of immune cells. High CHAF1A expression indicated a favorable response and prognosis in immunotherapy of several cohorts, which was independent of MSI, TMB, TNB, PD-L1 expression, immune phenotype and transcriptome scoring, and improved patient selection based on these classic biomarkers. In vivo, CHAF1A knockdown alone inhibited tumor growth but it impaired the effect of an anti-PD-1 antibody by increasing the relative tumor proliferation rate and decreasing the survival benefit, potentially through the activation of TGF-β signaling. In conclusion, CHAF1A may be a novel biomarker for improving patient selection in immunotherapy.

Emerging prognostic biomarkers in advanced cutaneous melanoma: a literature update

INTRODUCTION

Over the past two years, the scientific community has witnessed an exponential growth in research focused on identifying prognostic biomarkers for melanoma, both in pre-clinical and clinical settings. This surge in studies reflects the need of developing effective prognostic indicators in the field of melanoma.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this work is to review the scientific literature on the most recent findings on the development or validation of prognostic biomarkers in melanoma, in the attempt of providing both clinicians and researchers with an updated broad synopsis of prognostic biomarkers in cutaneous melanoma.

EXPERT OPINION

While the field of prognostic biomarkers in melanoma appears promising, there are several complexities and limitations to address. The interdependence of clinical, histological, and molecular features requires accurate classification of different biomarker families. Correlation does not imply causation, and adjustments for confounding factors are often overlooked. In this scenario, large-scale studies based on high-quality clinical trial data can provide more reliable evidence. It is essential to avoid oversimplification by focusing on a single biomarker, as the interactions among multiple factors contribute to define the disease course and patient's outcome. Furthermore, implementing well-supported evidence in real-life settings can help advance prognostic biomarker research in melanoma.

Immunogenomics of cholangiocarcinoma

The development of cholangiocarcinoma spans years, if not decades, during which the immune system becomes corrupted and permissive to primary tumor development and metastasis. This involves subversion of local immunity at tumor sites, as well as systemic immunity and the wider host response. While immune dysfunction is a hallmark of all cholangiocarcinoma, the specific steps of the cancer-immunity cycle that are perturbed differ between patients. Heterogeneous immune functionality impacts the evolutionary development, pathobiological behavior, and therapeutic response of these tumors. Integrative genomic analyses of thousands of primary tumors have supported a biological rationale for immune-based stratification of patients, encompassing immune cell composition and functionality. However, discerning immune alterations responsible for promoting tumor initiation, maintenance, and progression from those present as bystander events remains challenging. Functionally uncoupling the tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressing roles of immune profiles will be critical for identifying new immunomodulatory treatment strategies and associated biomarkers for patient stratification. This review will discuss the immunogenomics of cholangiocarcinoma, including the impact of genomic alterations on immune functionality, subversion of the cancer-immunity cycle, as well as clinical implications for existing and novel treatment strategies.

SWI/SNF Complex Alterations in Tumors with Rhabdoid Features: Novel Therapeutic Approaches and Opportunities for Adoptive Cell Therapy

The SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin-remodeling complex is one of the most remarkably altered epigenetic regulators in cancer. Pathogenic mutations in genes encoding SWI/SNF-related proteins have been recently described in many solid tumors, including rare and aggressive malignancies with rhabdoid features with no standard therapies in advanced or metastatic settings. In recent years, clinical trials with targeted drugs aimed at restoring its function have shown discouraging results. However, preclinical data have found an association between these epigenetic alterations and response to immune therapy. Thus, the rationale for immunotherapy strategies in SWI/SNF complex alteration-related tumors is strong. Here, we review the SWI/SNF complex and how its dysfunction drives the oncogenesis of rhabdoid tumors and the proposed strategies to revert this alteration and promising novel therapeutic approaches, including immune checkpoint inhibition and adoptive cell therapy.