A phase II study of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in metastatic pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E3296)

Evaluation of Phase II Trial Design in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated how well phase II trials in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (LAMPC) meet current recommendations for trial design.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of phase II first-line treatment trial for LAMPC. We assessed baseline characteristics, type of comparison, and primary end point to examine adherence to the National Cancer Institute recommendations for trial design.

RESULTS

We identified 148 studies (180 treatment arms, 7505 participants). Forty-seven (32%) studies adhered to none of the 5 evaluated National Cancer Institute recommendations, 62 (42%) followed 1, 31 (21%) followed 2, and 8 (5%) followed 3 recommendations. Studies varied with respect to the proportion of patients with good performance status (range, 0%-80%) and locally advanced disease (range, 14%-100%). Eighty-two (55%) studies concluded that investigational agents should progress to phase III testing; of these, 24 (16%) had documented phase III trials. Three (8%) phase III trials demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements for investigational agents. One of 38 phase II trials that investigated biological investigational agents was enriched for a biomarker.

CONCLUSIONS

Phase II trials do not conform well to current recommendations for trial design in LAMPC.

What treatment in 2017 for inoperable pancreatic cancers?

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a frequent and severe disease, either diagnosed as metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA) or as locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC). Though no improvement in patients outcome have been made between 1996 and 2011, since 5 years new treatment options have become available to treat our patients. New standard first line regimens, such as FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine combined with nab-paclitaxel, have improved overall survivals and second line treatments have been tested and validated. Other first-line treatments have failed, but research remains active and trials are ongoing with promising new anti-cancer agents. These new effective regimens used for MPA have yielded promising results in LAPC patients in open cohorts or phase II trials and a recent trial have failed to demonstrate the added value of classical external radiotherapy in this setting. Here, we review current standards of care in LAPC and MPA, consider the latest challenges and strategic questions, and examine what we may hope for in the future.

Preclinical Rationale for the Phase III Trials in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Is Wishful Thinking Clouding Successful Drug Development for Pancreatic Cancer?

Prior phase III trials in advanced pancreatic cancer have been predominantly unsuccessful. In this review, we attempt to understand how past preclinical data were translated into phase III clinical trials in metastatic pancreatic cancer as described in the article. A systematic literature review conducted through the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, from January 1997 to June 2015 using key words-phase III clinical trials, metastatic/advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma or pancreatic cancer identified 30 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met criteria. The trials were limited to RCTs in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The success rate of first-line phase III studies in advanced pancreatic cancer was only 13%. In 60% of the RCTs, no preclinical experiments were referenced in biologically cognate pancreatic models. Nine (30%) of the RCTs were designed based on preclinical evidence from in vitro cell lines alone without additional in vivo validation in xenograft models. It remains uncertain how strongly the preclinical data influence the development of clinical regimens but so far the studies developed based on more solid preclinical evidence have been successful.

Phase II clinical trials on investigational drugs for the treatment of pancreatic cancers

INTRODUCTION

Despite some recent advances in treatment options, pancreatic cancer remains a devastating disease with poor outcomes. In a trend contrary to most malignancies, both incidence and mortality continue to rise due to pancreatic cancer. The majority of patients present with advanced disease and there are no treatment options for this stage that have demonstrated a median survival > 1 year. As the penultimate step prior to Phase III studies involving hundreds of patients, Phase II clinical trials provide an early opportunity to evaluate the efficacy of new treatments that are desperately needed for this disease.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the results of published Phase II clinical trials in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma published within the past 5 years. The treatment results are framed in the context of the current standards of care and the historic challenge of predicting Phase III success from Phase II trial results.

EXPERT OPINION

Promising therapies remain elusive in pancreatic cancer based on recent Phase II clinical trial results. Optimization and standardization of clinical trial design in the Phase II setting, with consistent incorporation of biomarkers, is needed to more accurately identify promising therapies that warrant Phase III evaluation.

Pancreatic stellate cells and pancreas cancer: current perspectives and future strategies

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly malignant disease with a very poor prognosis. To date patient outcomes have not improved principally due to the limited number of patients suitable for surgical resections and the radiation and chemotherapy resistance of these tumours. In the last decade, a failure of conventional therapies has forced researchers to re-examine the environment of PDAC. The tumour environment has been demonstrated to consist of an abundance of stroma containing many cells but predominantly pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs). Recent research has focused on understanding the interaction between PSCs and PDAC cells in vitro and in vivo. It is believed that the interaction between these cells is responsible for supporting tumour growth, invasion and metastasis and creating the barrier to delivery of chemotherapeutics. Novel approaches which focus on the interactions between PDAC and PSCs which sustain the tumour microenvironment may achieve significant patient benefits. This manuscript reviews the current evidence regarding PSCs, their interaction with PDAC cells and the potential implication this may have for future therapies.

METHODS

A PubMed search was carried out for the terms 'pancreas cancer' OR 'pancreatic cancer', AND 'pancreatic stellate cells', NOT 'hepatic stellate cells'. All studies were screened and assessed for their eligibility and manuscripts exploring the relationship between PSCs and PDAC were included. The studies were subdivided into in vitro and in vivo groups.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-six manuscripts were identified and reduced to seventy-three in vitro and in vivo studies for review. The manuscripts showed that PDAC cells and PSCs interact with each other to enhance proliferation, reduce apoptosis and increase migration and invasion of cancer cells. The pathways through which they facilitate these actions provide potential targets for future novel therapies.

CONCLUSION

There is accumulating evidence supporting the multiple roles of PSCs in establishing the tumour microenvironment and supporting the survival of PDAC. To further validate these findings there is a need for greater use of physiologically relevant models of pancreatic cancer in vitro such as three dimensional co-cultures and the use of orthotopic and genetically engineered murine (GEM) models in vivo.

Historical controls for metastatic pancreatic cancer: benchmarks for planning and analyzing single-arm phase II trials

We compiled and analyzed a database of cooperative group trials in advanced pancreatic cancer to develop historical benchmarks for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Such benchmarks are essential for evaluating new therapies in a single-arm setting. The analysis included patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving regimens that included gemcitabine, between 1995 and 2005. Prognostic baseline factors were selected by their significance in Cox regression analysis. Outlier trial arms were identified by comparing individual 6-month OS and PFS rates against the entire group. The dataset selected for the generation of OS and PFS benchmarks was then tested for intertrial arm variability using a logistic-normal model with the selected baseline prognostic factors as fixed effects and the individual trial arm as a random effect. A total of 1,132 cases from eight trials qualified. Performance status and sex were independently significant for OS, and performance status was prognostic for PFS. Outcomes for one trial (NCCTG-034A) were significantly different from the other trial arms. When this trial was excluded, the remaining trial arms were homogeneous for OS and PFS outcomes after adjusting for performance status and sex. Benchmark values for 6-month OS and PFS are reported along with a method for using these values in future study design and analysis. The benchmark survival values were generated from a dataset that was homogeneous between trials. The benchmarks can be used to enable single-arm phase II trials using a gemcitabine platform, especially under certain circumstances. Such circumstances might be when a randomized control arm is not practically feasible, an early signal of activity of an experimental agent is being explored such as in expansion cohorts of phase I studies, and in patients who are not candidates for combination cytotoxic therapy.

Efficacy of gemcitabine conjugated and miRNA-205 complexed micelles for treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer

Clinical effectiveness of gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer is hindered due to its rapid plasma metabolism and development of chemo-resistance. We have previously delineated the significant role of miRNAs in mediating the growth and proliferation of cancer stem cells (CSCs) which in turn result in chemo-resistance, invasion and metastasis. Here, we designed self-assembling, gemcitabine conjugated cationic copolymers for co-delivery of a tumor suppressor miRNA-205 (miR-205) and evaluated their in vivo efficacy in a pancreatic cancer ectopic tumor model developed using gemcitabine resistant MIA PaCa-2(R) cells. Combination formulations showed mean a particle size of <100 nm and gemcitabine payload of >10% w/w, exhibited miRNA complexation at N/P ratio of 4/1, sustained release of gemcitabine for >10 days, transfection efficiency of >90%, extended miRNA and drug stability in serum. Functional assays in gemcitabine resistant MIA PaCa-2(R) and CAPAN-1(R) pancreatic cancer cells revealed that the combination formulations effectively reversed chemo-resistance, invasion and migration. In pancreatic tumor model, the combination formulation treated group showed significant inhibition of tumor growth. Immuno-hiostochemical analysis revealed decreased tumor cell proliferation with increased apoptosis in the animals treated with miR-205 and gemcitabine combination.

Combinational therapy: new hope for pancreatic cancer?

Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a low overall survival rate. Chemotherapy is the most common treatment for patients presenting with advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine achieves a modest improvement in overall survival and is the gold standard for advanced pancreatic cancer treatment. Capecitabine and S-1, derivatives of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), offers minimal clinical benefits. Folfirinox represents a new and aggressive regimen that might benefit patients of metastatic pancreatic cancer with good performance status. Other chemotherapy drugs such as platinums and irinotecan do not provide significant improvement in overall survival, but have been used as part of combinational therapies. Comparing to systemically delivered chemotherapy, regional intra-arterial chemotherapy achieves higher local drug concentration in tumors with lower systemic drug toxicity, and may serve as a better treatment regimen. Although there have been progress made in chemotherapeutic strategies against pancreatic cancer, the overall survival is not significantly improved in the last decade. Recently, development of chemotherapy in combination with molecular targeted therapies holds great promise in pancreatic cancer treatment, especially in patients with metastatic disease. Growing bodies of preclinical and clinical evidences indicate that the combination of conventional modalities with specific molecular targeted therapy increase the efficacy of the monotherapy without an increase in toxicity. In this review, we summarized the current regimens of chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer and highlighted the novel combinational treatments tested in recent clinical trials.

Randomized phase II trials: a long-term investment with promising returns

Given the multitude of novel anticancer drugs and the limited resources available to study them, phase II trials should identify drugs with the highest probability of succeeding in subsequent phase III trials. Currently, single-arm phase II trial results are interpreted relative to historical control subjects, introducing selection bias and confounding that may limit the validity of the conclusions. The rate of success (defined as a statistically significant difference between arms) in phase III oncology trials is only 40%, suggesting that current phase II trials are insufficiently informative. However, simulation studies suggest that randomized phase II trials would have lower error rates and greater predictive power for phase III results. Randomized phase II trials may also be more informative than single-arm phase II trials because of the hypotheses being tested, the variety of possible endpoints, and the opportunities for biomarker discovery. There are a wide variety of randomized phase II designs that can be used, including the randomized discontinuation design, the delayed-start design, adaptive (Bayesian) designs, selection designs, and phase II/III designs. The barriers to widespread adoption of randomized phase II trials include time to completion, sample size considerations, and ethical concerns, but none are insurmountable. We conclude that randomized phase II trials are a worthy investment considering finite patient and financial resources and should be the rule rather than the exception for evaluating novel therapies in oncology.

Management of mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas

The purpose of this study was to investigate the actual management of mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) of the pancreas. A systematic review was performed in December 2009 by consulting PubMed MEDLINE for publications and matching the key words “pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm”, “pancreatic mucinous cystic tumour”, “pancreatic mucinous cystic mass”, “pancreatic cyst”, and “pancreatic cystic neoplasm” to identify English language articles describing the diagnosis and treatment of the mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas. In total, 16 322 references ranging from January 1969 to December 2009 were analysed and 77 articles were identified. No articles published before 1996 were selected because MCNs were not previously considered to be a completely autonomous disease. Definition, epidemiology, anatomopathological findings, clinical presentation, preoperative evaluation, treatment and prognosis were reviewed. MCNs are pancreatic mucin-producing cysts with a distinctive ovarian-type stroma localized in the body-tail of the gland and occurring in middle-aged females. The majority of MCNs are slow growing and asymptomatic. The prevalence of invasive carcinoma varies between 6% and 55%. Preoperative diagnosis depends on a combination of clinical features, tumor markers, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasound with cyst fluid analysis, and positron emission tomography-CT. Surgery is indicated for all MCNs.

Efficacy and tolerability of limited field radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine in locally advanced pancreatic cancer

AIMS

Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are most commonly managed with chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), which may or may not include non-involved regional lymph nodes in the clinical target volume. We present our results of CRT for LAPC using capecitabine and delivering radiotherapy to a limited radiation field that excluded non-involved regional lymph nodes from the clinical target volume.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients were studied. Patients received 50.4 Gy external beam radiotherapy in 28 fractions, delivered to a planning target volume expanded from the primary tumour and involved nodes only. Capecitabine (500-600 mg/m2) was given twice daily continuously during radiotherapy. Toxicity and efficacy data were prospectively collected.

RESULTS

Nausea, vomiting and tumour pain were the most common grade 2 toxicities. One patient developed grade 3 nausea. The median time to progression was 8.8 months, with 20% remaining progression free at 1 year. The median overall survival was 9.7 months with a 1 year survival of 30%. Of 21 patients with imaged progression, 13 (62%) progressed systemically, three (14%) had local progression, two (10%) had locoregional progression and three (14%) progressed with both local/locoregional and systemic disease.

CONCLUSION

CRT using capecitabine and limited field radiotherapy is a well-tolerated, relatively efficacious treatment for LAPC. The low toxicity and low regional progression rates support the use of limited field radiotherapy, allowing evaluation of this regimen with other anti-cancer agents.

Systemic therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Systemic treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma achieves only modest benefits, with evidence indicating a survival advantage with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) over best supportive care alone, and further advantage of single-agent gemcitabine over 5-FU. There are very few regimens better than single-agent gemcitabine despite multiple trials of cytotoxic and targeted agents. The addition of a platinum agent has improved response rate but not survival. The addition of erlotinib has improved survival but only by a small margin. The use of gemcitabine in multidrug regimens containing one or more of: a platinum agent; fluoropyrimidine; anthracycline; and taxane has demonstrated advantages in response rate, progression-free survival and, in one randomized study, overall survival. After gemcitabine failure, second-line therapy with oxaliplatin and 5-FU provides a further survival advantage. Further advances depend upon the current and future clinical trials investigating enhanced delivery of current agents, new agents and novel modalities, improved supportive care, and treatment more tailored to the individual patient and tumour.

Medical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States. In 2008, an estimated 34,290 people died from pancreatic cancer and 37,680 new cases were diagnosed. Despite modern treatment, 90% of patients die within 1 year of diagnosis. Pancreatectomy is still the only potentially curative approach, but most patients have incurable disease by the time they are diagnosed, and fewer than 20% are candidates for surgery. In the present paper the English-language literature addressing the medical management in pancreatic cancer was reviewed. Based on these data we will discuss the role of currently used chemotherapy and target therapy in pancreatic cancer, as well as perspectives of the emerging strategies that are arising in order to improve the outcomes of this complex disease.

The flavonoid apigenin potentiates the growth inhibitory effects of gemcitabine and abrogates gemcitabine resistance in human pancreatic cancer cells

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of combination therapy of apigenin and gemcitabine on cell proliferation, the cell cycle, and gemcitabine resistance in human pancreatic cancer cells.

METHODS

Cell counting was used to assess the effect of single-agent and combination treatment on the proliferation of CD18 and AsPC-1 pancreatic cancer cells. Flow cytometry was performed to assess the effect of combination treatment on cell cycle progression and induction of apoptosis. Western blot analysis was used to evaluate phosporylated AKT (pAkt) and cell cycle proteins. The effect of apigenin on gemcitabine-resistant AsPC-1 cells was assessed via thymidine incorporation.

RESULTS

Apigenin in combination with gemcitabine inhibited pancreatic cancer cell proliferation more than either agent alone. Combination treatment induced both S and G2/M phase arrest and increased apoptosis. Apigenin down-regulated pAkt expression and abrogated gemcitabine-mediated pAkt induction. In gemcitabine-resistant AsPC-1 cells, apigenin significantly inhibited cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner.

CONCLUSION

Combination treatment with apigenin and gemcitabine inhibited pancreatic cancer cell growth via cell cycle arrest, down-regulation of the prosurvival factor pAkt, and induction of apoptosis. Combination therapy may prove useful for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

COX-2 and NF-KB overexpression is common in pancreatic cancer but does not predict for COX-2 inhibitors activity in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin

OBJECTIVE

The attempt to improve therapeutic results in pancreatic carcinoma has recently focused on the emerging role of molecular biology. We investigated the role of COX-2 and NF-KB expression in relation to the use of a COX-2 inhibitor (celecoxib) associated to gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with histologically or cytologically verified, locally advanced unresectable and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma were eligible for the study.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (75%) assumed celecoxib for all their treatment period. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks, until there was evidence of disease progression, patient refusal, or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy was assessed according to tumor response, clinical benefit, and time-related parameters. Five patients had a partial response, 24 had a stable disease, and 15 had a disease progression, for an overall response rate of 11%. Biochemical response rate based on CA 19.9 levels showed 2 complete and 10 partial responses, whereas 31 patients presented no changes of CA 19.9 levels. COX-2 protein expression was found in 30 tumors, while a moderate or weak/absent expression was present in 10 patients. Sixteen tumors showed a strong expression for NF-KB, 4 a moderate expression, and 5 a weak/absent expression.

CONCLUSION

The use of a COX-2 inhibitor does not add any valuable activity to a gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination, even in patients with COX-2 and NF-KB overexpressing tumors.

The gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine (GTX) regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

We developed a laboratory based regimen called GTX which induces synergistic apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cells. This retrospective review summarizes our clinical experience with GTX in an initial group of 35 patients; 66% untreated and 34% failed prior therapies.

METHODS

All patients treated with GTX for metastatic pancreatic cancer, prior to initiation of a prospective phase II trial of GTX were assessed and followed until death. GTX consisted of capecitabine (X), 750 mg/m(2) p.o. BID on days 1-14, gemcitabine (G) (750 mg/m(2)) over 75 min and docetaxel (T) (30 mg/m(2)) on days 4 and 11. Thus one cycle of GTX was 14 days with 7 days off for a 21 day cycle. Tumor assessments were repeated every 3 cycles.

RESULTS

All 35 patients had metastatic pancreatic cancer (94% liver, 6% lung sites). Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities were: leukopenia and thrombocytopenia-both 14%, and anemia 9%, respectively. The overall response rate of all 35 patients treated with GTX (from 0.5 cycles onward) was 29% (CR/PR) by WHO criteria, and 31% had a minor response or stable disease (MR, SD). At the metastatic sites for the 35 patients, there were 9% complete (CR) and 31% partial (PR) responses (total 40%). For the 31 patients who had their primary tumor (4 patients had a prior Whipple resection), there were 13% CR and 19% PR for a response rate of 32% at the primary tumor site. Overall median progression free survival of responders was 6.3 months (95% C.I. 4.4-10.4 months) and median survival was 11.2 months (95% C.I. 8.1-15.1 months). Survival after initiation of GTX at 12, 18, 24 and 30 months was 43, 29, 20, and 11%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective review suggests that GTX has potential as a regimen for untreated and treated metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Pooled efficacy analysis from a phase I-II study of biweekly irinotecan in combination with gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Development of treatments to improve the outcomes achieved with single-agent gemcitabine therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer remains a research priority. G-FLIP (gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin) is a four-drug regimen designed to maximize sequence-dependent synergy, while attempting to minimize toxicity among the four drugs. The dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan as part of the G-FLIP regimen have been published. For phase II testing, G-FLIP consisted of sequential gemcitabine 500 mg/m2 at a fixed rate of 10 mg/m2/min, irinotecan 120 mg/m2, bolus 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 and leucovorin 300 mg, followed by a 24-h 5-fluorouracil infusion of 1500 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 14 days. Thirty-three patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (22 men and 11 women) were treated and 31 were evaluable. Median patient age was 63 years (range 44-78 years) and median Karnofsky performance status score was 70-80. Estimated median time to disease progression was 171 days (6.1 months) and Kaplan-Meir-estimated median overall survival was 229 days (8.1 months). Twelve- and 18-month survivals were 33 and 21%, respectively. As per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, 13 patients had stable disease, seven (22%) attained a partial response, and 10 (32%) had disease progression. One patient attained a complete response and two were not evaluable (one withdrew consent and one died suddenly, each after cycle 1). Treatment generally was well tolerated. Grade 3-4 toxicities/patient were thrombocytopenia (3.1%), leukopenia (15%), neutropenia (21%), neutropenic fever (3%), fatigue (18%) and thrombosis (12.5%). Common grade 1-2 toxicities per patient included nausea/vomiting (69%), diarrhea (45%), constipation (21%) and fatigue (39%). In conclusion, G-FLIP is a feasible outpatient regimen with acceptable toxicity for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. Disease control rate (stable disease rate plus partial or complete responses) and 1-year survival outcomes are encouraging.

A phase I/II study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

In an effort to improve efficacy of single-agent gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer, several studies have examined the effects of 5-FU combined with gemcitabine. However, no studies to date have been performed in Japanese patients. We thus conducted a phase I/II study of gemcitabine and infusional 5-FU in Japanese patients to determine a recommended dosage for this combination and clarify efficacy and toxicity.

METHODS

Phase I evaluated the frequency of dose limiting toxicity of two 5-FU dosages (400 and 500 mg/m(2)/day) infused continuously over 5 days combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) x 3 every 4 weeks. Results from phase I determined the recommended dosage to be examined in phase II for effect on survival period, clinical benefit response (CBR), tumor response and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 34 chemo-naive patients were entered into the study. All had a Karnofsky performance of > or =50 points and distant metastases. Dose limiting toxicities in phase I determined the recommended 5-FU dosage at 400 mg/m(2)/day. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities (neutropenia, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia) were the most common severe toxicities. For the 28 patients administered the recommended dosage, 1-year survival rate was 14.3%, median survival time 7.1 months and progression free survival 3.2 months. Seven patients achieved a 25% overall response rate and three showed 27.3% improvement in CBR.

CONCLUSION

Although a meaningful survival benefit over single-agent gemcitabine was not demonstrated, 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day infused continuously over 5 days in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) x 3 every 4 weeks appeared to be a moderately effective palliative treatment with low toxicity in Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

Single-agent gemcitabine was established as standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer after a superior clinical benefit response was demonstrated in a randomized study comparing it to 5-fluorouracil (FU). Until recently, many subsequent randomized trials of newer, often gemcitabine-based combinations have not been able to show improved survival over gemcitabine. Combination gemcitabine and capecitabine is likely to become the preferred standard treatment, at least in the UK, on the basis of the positive interim results of the UK National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) randomized study of chemotherapy with this combination. At present, there is no standard second-line treatment for patients who have become refractory to gemcitabine, although a recently reported study has suggested that oxaliplatin with FU and leucovorin is superior to best supportive care in these patients. This article will review and discuss the clinical trials of chemotherapy for this disease, including the more recent trials, which have included the novel targeted agents.

Cytotoxic Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer

Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for pancreatic cancer as most patients present with advanced disease, which precludes locoregional treatment. However, the efficacy of chemotherapy is limited. Gemcitabine is the only agent that improves symptoms and confers a modest survival advantage. Many combination therapy regimens have been studied in phase II settings. Eleven randomised phase III trials have been conducted to compare gemcitabine-containing regimens with gemcitabine monotherapy since gemcitabine became available clinically. The combination of gemcitabine plus capecitabine has demonstrated a survival advantage over gemcitabine, whereas gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin and gemcitabine plus cisplatin have shown improved progression-free survival or time to tumour progression but failed to demonstrate a survival advantage over gemcitabine. The search for effective therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer continues. Gemcitabine in combination with cytotoxic agents or molecular targeted agents hold promise.

A phase II trial of gemcitabine and weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil in a 48-hour continuous-infusion schedule in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. A study of the Spanish Cooperative Group for Gastrointestinal Tumour Therapy (TTD)

AIM

A multi-centred, open-labelled, phase 11 study containing 46 patients was conducted to evaluate the clinical benefit of gemcitabine (1,400 mg/m(2)) combined with 5-FU (3 g/m(2)) in a 48 h continuous infusion (CI).

METHODS

Both drugs were administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of every 4 week cycle in chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced unresectable metastatic pancreatic carcinoma. The minimum follow-up was 6 months.

RESULTS

Clinical benefit response was the primary endpoint and this was achieved by 24.4% of the patients. Quality of life (QoL) improved in 16.6% of patients. Objective response was observed in 7% of the patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.4 weeks and the median overall survival (OS) time was 22.7 weeks. One-year survival was 25%. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (45%), mucositis (7.5%) and hyperbilirubinaemia (10.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

This schedule was not superior in terms of clinical benefit, response rate, PFS and OS than standard gemcitabine treatment

Phase I trial of oral S-1 combined with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer

The objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of S-1, an oral fluorouracil derivative, combined with gemcitabine, the current standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). The subjects were histopathologically proven APC patients with distant metastasis. S-1 was administered orally twice daily each day for 14 days and gemcitabine on days 8 and 15 of each cycle, and this was repeated every 21 days. Doses of each drug were planned as follows: level 1: 800/60, level 2a: 800/80, level 2b: 1000/60, level 3: 1000/80 (gemcitabine (mg m⁻²)/S-1 (mg m⁻² day⁻¹)). In all, 21 patients with APC were enrolled. The main grade 3–4 toxicities observed during first cycle were neutropenia (33%), anaemia (10%), thrombocytopenia (14%) and anorexia (10%). There were no DLT observed in level 1. Three of six patients in level 2a had DLT and this level was considered the MTD. In all, 12 patients in level 2b had no DLT and this level was selected as the recommended dose. Applicable responses were one complete response and nine partial responses (48%). As toxicities were well tolerated and antitumour activities seem to be promising, this combination can be recommended for further phase II studies with APC.

Treatment for pancreatic cancer: current therapy and continued progress

In the last decade, continued efforts in pancreas cancer research have led to the development of new, more effective therapies. Additionally, progress in understanding the molecular processes underlying the development and progression of this disease provides hope for the development of more effective treatment strategies. Recent clinical trials have provided reason for hope that novel chemotherapy combinations and molecularly targeted agents will lead to improved clinical outcomes for patients with this disease. This article will summarize the data that has led to the current standards of therapy for patients with resectable and advanced pancreatic cancer and review new treatment strategies for this disease.

Phase II clinical trial of 5-fluorouracil, trimetrexate, and leucovorin (NFL) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Advanced pancreatic cancer has limited treatment options. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is frequently used in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Preclinical studies suggest synergism between trimetrexate (TMTX),5-FU, and leucovorin (NFL).

AIM

We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the activity and safety of NFL in pancreatic cancer.

METHOD

Eligible patients (n = 21) with untreated advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with 110 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) THTX on day 1 and 200 mg/m2 IV leucovorin prior to 500 mg/m2 IV 5-FU on day 2. Oral leucovorin (15 mg every 6 h for seven doses) started intravenous 24 h later.

RESULTS

Treatment was administered for 6 wk followed by a 2-wk rest period. Response was evaluated every 8 wk. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Most patients (80%) had distant metastases. Forty-five cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The most common serious toxicities were Grade 3 diarrhea (23.8%) and nausea and vomiting (14.2%). The response rate was 4.1% (95% CI, 0-23%), median survival was 6.8 mo, and 1-yr survival was 19%.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with NFL is well-tolerated in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The median survival and 1-yr survival in these patients with poor prognosis compares favorably with other treatment options.

Weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a phase II study of the EORTC GastroIntestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group

The aim of the study was to assess the response rate and toxicity of high-dose 24 h infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Patients with measurable disease, performance status 0-2, and no prior chemotherapy were registered to receive cycles of leucovorin (LV) 500 mg/m2 (or l-LV 250 mg/m2 over 1 h followed by 5FU 2.6 g/m2 over 24 h, weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest. The main endpoints were the response rate and toxicity. From 37 patients, 36 were the analysed for toxicity, and 33 were eligible and analysed for response. The median age was 59 years (range 28-74 years), and the median performance status was 1. Partial response was observed in three patients (9%) (95% Confidential Interval (CI): [2-24]%). Main grade 3/4 National Cancer Institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria toxicities (patients) were diarrhoea (n = 3), vomiting (n = 2) and hand-foot syndrome (n = 5). Median time to progression was 7 weeks (95% CI: [6.4-11.7] weeks) and median survival 19 weeks (95% CI: [12-35] weeks). In conclusion, high-dose 5FU and folinic acid is well tolerated, but has only modest activity in pancreatic cancer.

Phase II study of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (FOLFUGEM 2)

AIM

FOLFUGEM 1 (leucovorin 400 mg/m2 combined with 5-flurorouracil (FU) bolus 400 mg/m2 then 5-FU 2-3 g/m2/46 hours and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 in 30 min) in patients with locally-advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma appeared to be toxic (neutropenia and alopecia). The aims of this phase II multicentric study were to evaluate the response rate, clinical benefit and tolerance of a new scheme of combined leucovorin, 5-FU and gemcitabine (FOLFUGEM 2).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

FOLFUGEM 2 associated leucovorin 400 mg/m2 in 2 hours followed by 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 in 22 hours, then gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 (10 mg/m2/min) with cycles every 14 days. Gemcitabine dose could be increased (1000 then 1250 mg/m2) when NCI/CTC toxicity was < or = grade 2.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were included (locally-advanced tumor: N = 13 and metastatic: N = 45). Among the 39 patients with measurable disease, 11 had partial response (28.2%, 95% confidence interval: 14-42%) and 11 had stable disease (28.2%). On an intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 19% (95% confidence interval: 9-29%). Clinical benefit rate was 46%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 3.1 and 7.2 months, respectively. There were 13% grade 3-4 neutropenia and 36% complete alopecia.

CONCLUSION

FOLFUGEM 2 schema has an antitumoral effect in advanced pancreatic cancer and has an acceptable toxicity which appears to be less than that of FOLFUGEM 1.

Phase I dose-finding study of biweekly irinotecan in combination with fixed doses of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, gemcitabine and cisplatin (G-FLIP) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer or other solid tumors

This phase I trial was initiated based on encouraging clinical data with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), gemcitabine and cisplatin (G-FLIP) in the therapy of solid tumors. In this trial, G-FLIP has been modified to facilitate outpatient administration and to optimize sequence-dependent synergistic activity. Treatment consisted of biweekly (once every 14 days) cycles of sequential gemcitabine 500 mg/m, irinotecan per dose escalation schedule, bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m and LV 300 mg on day 1 followed by a 24-h 5-FU infusion 1500 mg/m, followed by cisplatin 35 mg/m on day 2. The irinotecan starting dose was 80 mg/m and escalated by 20 mg/m in cohorts of three patients until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined. Twenty-three patients were enrolled (13 men/10 women) with the following cancers: 11 pancreatic, five gallbladder, three squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, one hepatocellular carcinoma, one melanoma, one gastric, and one breast cancer. Median patient age was 63 years (range 44-78) and median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 80. Patients received a median of 8 cycles (range 1-16) over five irinotecan dose levels (80, 100, 120, 140 and 160 mg/m). Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of grade 3 nausea/vomiting despite aggressive anti-emetic therapy occurred in one patient at dose level 1 and three patients at dose level 3. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities per patient consisted of thrombocytopenia (3%), anemia (6%), thrombosis (23%), neutropenia (16%) and neutropenic fever (10%). Of 18 patients evaluable for response, one complete response (pancreatic) and eight partial responses (three gallbladder, two pancreatic, two head and neck, and one breast) were attained. Seven patients had disease stabilization (five pancreatic, one hepatocellular and one gastric) for a median of 16 weeks (range 10-22). Median time to disease progression among all 23 patients enrolled to the phase I portion of the trial was 20.5 weeks (range 4-37). We conclude that G-FLIP is a novel outpatient chemotherapy regimen with acceptable toxicity at the maximum tolerated irinotecan dose of 120 mg/m. The phase II trial of G-FLIP using an irinotecan dose of 120 mg/m for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer is ongoing.

Gemcitabine Combined with Infusional 5-Fluorouracil and High-Dose Leucovorin for the Treatment of Advanced Carcinoma of the Pancreas

<b><i>Background:</i></b> 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and gemcitabine are the major active drugs in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Twenty-two patients with advanced pancreas cancer were treated with a new chemotherapy regimen consisting of infusional 5-FU and high-dose leucovorin with gemcitabine (GEMFUFOL). <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 200 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The response rate was 27.3%, all responses being partial. The median survival time and 1-year survival rate were, respectively, 13 months and 60.4%. The toxicity was very low and severe hematological toxicity was exceptional. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The GEMFUFOL regimen can be an active regimen for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer and has a low toxicity.

Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Combined with Uracil-Tegafur in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

<i>Objective:</i> The single agent gemcitabine is the standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Recent studies of a combination of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) revealed that survival data were superior to those with gemcitabine or 5-FU alone. The administration of oral uracil-tegafur (UFT) is more convenient and simulates the effect of a continuous or protracted infusion of 5-FU. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study of gemcitabine combined with UFT in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients and assessed the efficacy and the toxicity of the regimen. <i>Methods:</i> Twenty-two pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients (18 males, 4 females) were enrolled from December 2000 to September 2002. The regimen consisted of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks, and oral UFT 390 mg/m²/day (in 3 divided doses) on days 1–14. The cycle was repeated every 28 days. The objective tumor response was evaluated after 2 courses of chemotherapy. <i>Results:</i> 82 cycles were administered in total, with a median of 3 cycles per patient (range 1–6 cycles). The median age was 52 years (range 28–69 years). Response to treatment could be assessed in all patients. The objective response rate was 22.7% (95% CI, 7.8–45.4) with no complete response and 5 partial responses. Four patients (18.2%) had stable disease and 13 patients (59.1%) had a progression. The median time to progression was 4.2 months (range 0.9–13.6). The median overall survival was 5.8 months (range 0.5–13.6). Of 10 patients eligible for the assessment of clinical benefit response, 4 (40%, 95% CI 12.2–73.8) showed clinical benefit. Among 21 patients with baseline CA 19-9 levels, CA 19-9 was reduced by 50% or more in 12 patients (57.1%). The chemotherapy was generally well tolerated and the most common grade 3–4 toxic side effects were neutropenia (18.2%), anemia (4.5%), and diarrhea (4.5%). <i>Conclusion:</i> The combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and UFT in metastatic pancreatic cancer was tolerable for most patients but showed modest response rates and clinical benefit. However, a randomized phase III study should be conducted in order to further test the efficacy of the regimen.

A phase II study of mitomycin C, cisplatin and protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic carcinoma: efficacy and low toxicity

BACKGROUND

The effective treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma represents a formidable challenge. There is a need to develop systemic therapies which combine efficacy with acceptable toxicity. The current 'gold standard' gemcitabine gives an objective response rate of the order of 20% and median survival up to 6 months. Here we have evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of mitomycin C, cisplatin and protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil (MCF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients with locally advanced (13 patients) or metastatic (32 patients) pancreatic carcinoma were treated with mitomycin C 7 mg/m(2) 6 weekly, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) 3 weekly and protracted venous infusion 5-FU 300 mg/m(2)/day. Patients were evaluated for response after three cycles and received six cycles in total in the absence of progressive disease or poor tolerance. Median age was 62 (45-75) years; 41 patients were World Health Organization performance status 0-1.

RESULTS

Treatment was well tolerated with 36 (84%) patients completing three or more cycles. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were uncommon: anaemia in three patients (7%), mucositis in two (5%), nausea and vomiting in three (7%) and diarrhoea in one (1%). An objective response was seen in 21 (46%) patients. There was one complete response. The median survival overall was 7.1 months and 10.5 months in responders. The median duration of response was 4.3 months. One-year survival was 29%, 2-year survival was 18%.

CONCLUSIONS

MCF combines efficacy with low toxicity in the treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinoma. The efficacy is at least comparable and may be superior to single-agent gemcitabine and MCF may therefore provide a cost-effective alternative.

Chemotherapeutic advances in pancreatic cancer

Advances in chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer have been limited. In the past decade, the standard therapy for metastatic disease has switched from 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to gemcitabine. However, several other cytotoxic agents have shown limited but promising efficacy in pancreatic cancer, and many of these appear to be well suited for combination chemotherapy. Although 5-FU and cisplatin have not demonstrated substantial survival benefits when combined with gemcitabine, results of several phase III trials with other agents are still pending. For locally advanced disease, most recent studies have incorporated gemcitabine into combined-modality therapy. Similarly, in surgically resectable disease, current trials are incorporating gemcitabine into adjuvant therapy. Other trials are using neoadjuvant therapy as a possible means to improve upon current surgical results. However, much hope comes from the development of newer "targeted" therapies for this disease. Although matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors and farnesyl transferase inhibitors did not appear to be effective in initial studies, other targeted therapies are beginning to enter clinical trials.

Weekly gemcitabine and 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I-II study

OBJECTIVE

In this phase I-II study we explored the potential of the combination of weekly gemcitabine (GEM) and 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in order to determine the toxicity profile in pancreatic cancer. The efficacy of this drug combination was studied as a secondary endpoint.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable or metastatic previously untreated pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this study. Two dose levels of GEM and two dose levels of 5-FU were evaluated in three cohorts of patients who received GEM 1,000 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), or GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,250 mg/m(2), on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks, respectively.

RESULTS

Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 10% of the cycles. Non-myelosuppressive toxicities included fatigue (22%), grade 1-2 diarrhea (12%) and grade 1 liver toxicity. There was no limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. Two patients experienced a partial response (9.5 +/- 12.6%) and 12 patients had stable disease (57.1 +/- 21.2%). Seven of the 14 symptomatic patients improved their disease-related symptoms and 4 of the 8 patients evaluable for clinical benefit had a clinically beneficial response (50 +/- 34.6%). The median progression-free survival was 6 months (range 2-28), median survival was 11 months (range 3-32+), and the actuarial 1-year survival rate 33%.

CONCLUSION

The weekly administration of GEM combined with 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU shows a good safety profile at the dose levels evaluated. Some partial responses had also been achieved, disregarding the dose level of the two drugs. Survival confirms the activity of this drug combination.

Combining capecitabine and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a phase I/II trial

PURPOSE

Preclinical studies indicate positive interactions between capecitabine, an oral fluorouracil precursor, and gemcitabine, the current standard treatment for advanced pancreatic carcinoma (APC). In this study, we investigated the addition of capecitabine to gemcitabine treatment for patients with APC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter study included patients naïve to chemotherapy who had histologically or cytologically confirmed, nonresectable or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma. Gemcitabine was given at a fixed dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Capecitabine was given in increasing doses orally bid for 14 days followed by a 1-week rest. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as one dose level below the dose causing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in >or= one third of a cohort of six patients. We included an additional 15 patients at the MTD.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included. DLT occurred at a dose of 800 mg/m(2) bid of capecitabine and consisted of myelotoxicity and mucositis. Hand-foot syndrome was not observed, and other toxic effects were mild. Thus, in this regimen, the recommended dose of capecitabine is 650 mg/m(2) bid. In 27 patients with measurable disease, we observed one complete and four partial remissions. In addition, significant drops (> 50% from baseline value) of the tumor marker CA 19-9 occurred in 14 of 24 assessable patients.

CONCLUSION

The combination of capecitabine and gemcitabine is well tolerated, with apparent efficacy in patients with APC. Therefore, it is currently being compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in a phase III study.

Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil plus eniluracil in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND

Eniluracil is a potent, irreversible inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the major catabolic enzyme for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Pretreatment with eniluracil significantly increases plasma half-life, plasma concentration and oral bioavailability of 5-FU. This multicenter phase II trial was designed to estimate the 6-month survival rate in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with 5-FU and eniluracil.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and sixteen patients (61 with no prior chemotherapy and 55 with prior chemotherapy) were registered for treatment with eniluracil 50 mg (total dose) p.o. on days 1-7 and 5-FU 20 mg/m(2)/day p.o. on days 2-6 of a 28-day treatment cycle.

RESULTS

In 106 patients evaluable for survival, the 6-month survival rate was 34% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22% to 47%, median survival 3.6 months] for patients who had not been treated previously with chemotherapy and 29% (95% CI 16% to 42%, median survival 3.4 months) for those who had received prior chemotherapy. For those patients with measurable disease, the confirmed response rates were 8% and 2%, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (29% of patients) and diarrhea (12% of patients). Overall, 69% of patients experienced a grade 3 or worse adverse event during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the combination of a 7-day course of eniluracil and a 5-day course of oral 5-FU has limited activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, and is associated with a high frequency of clinically significant adverse events.

Gemcitabine in combination with 5-fluorouracil with or without folinic acid in the treatment of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most frequently reported gastrointestinal tumors and has been reported to have a 5-year survival rate of < 5%. It is most commonly diagnosed at an advanced stage and until recently, the most frequently administered treatment for patients with advanced disease has been palliative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. However, in clinical trials, the novel antinucleoside gemcitabine is currently considered the standard of care and has demonstrated both a survival benefit over 5-FU and an improvement in disease-related symptoms in those patients with advanced disease. The current review presents an overview of recently completed and ongoing clinical trials of gemcitabine/5-FU combination therapy for pancreatic cancer. In these trials, the administration of 5-FU varied widely from bolus injection to 24-hour infusion to protracted infusion over several weeks. These variations make a definitive judgment of this combination difficult, especially because the majority of the data represent only Phase I and Phase II study results. Although a recently completed randomized Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus bolus 5-FU versus gemcitabine failed to show a clinically meaningful survival benefit for the combination arm, current data indicate that other gemcitabine/5-FU combinations might provide a therapeutic advantage over gemcitabine alone. However, the results of ongoing Phase III studies must be reviewed before a definitive statement can be made regarding the value of this combination in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine is generally considered to constitute first-line therapy for pancreatic cancer. To determine whether the addition of fluorouracil (5-FU) improves on the results from single-agent gemcitabine, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) compared gemcitabine plus bolus 5-FU with gemcitabine alone for patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This trial involved patients with biopsy-proven, advanced carcinoma of the pancreas not amenable to surgical resection. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine alone (1,000 mg/m(2)/wk) weekly for 3 weeks of every 4 or to receive gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)/wk) followed by 5-FU (600 mg/m(2)/wk) weekly on the same schedule. The primary end point of the trial was survival, with secondary end points of time to progression and response rate.

RESULTS

Of 327 patients enrolled over 18 months, 322 were eligible. Overall, the median survival was 5.4 months for gemcitabine alone and 6.7 months for gemcitabine plus 5-FU (P =.09). Progression-free survival for gemcitabine alone was 2.2 months, compared with 3.4 months for gemcitabine plus 5-FU (P =.022). Objective responses were uncommon and were observed in only 5.6% of patients treated with gemcitabine and 6.9% of patients treated with gemcitabine plus 5-FU. Most toxicities were hematologic or gastrointestinal; no significant differences were noted between the two treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

5-FU, administered in conjunction with gemcitabine, did not improve the median survival of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma compared with single-agent gemcitabine. Further studies with other combinations of gemcitabine and 5-FU are not compelling, and clinical trial resources should address other combinations and novel agents.

Present and future treatment of pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine has become a new standard for treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. This development is based not only on drug efficacy but also on a favorable side-effect profile. Combinations of gemcitabine with antitumor drugs such as cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, docetaxel, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, or capecitabine, and biological agents such as cetuximab or trastuzumab, have yielded promising results in phase II trials. However, none of these combinations has yet reached the level of an evidence-based standard treatment.

Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: final results of a GERCOR multicenter phase II study

PURPOSE

Based on preclinical in vitro synergy data, this study evaluated the activity and toxicity of a gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination in patients with metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Previously untreated metastatic and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled onto this multicenter phase II study. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) as a 10-mg/m(2)/min infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks. Patients with metastatic disease were treated until evidence of progressive disease, whereas patients with locally advanced disease received six cycles in the absence of progression, followed when appropriate by concomitant radiochemotherapy.

RESULTS

Among 64 eligible patients included in eight centers, 30 had locally advanced and 34 had metastatic disease. Response rate for the 62 patients with measurable disease was 30.6% (95% confidence interval, 19.7% to 42.3%), 31.0% for locally advanced and 30.3% for metastatic patients. Among 58 assessable patients, 40% had clinical benefit. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival (OS) were 5.3 and 9.2 months, respectively, with 36% of patients alive at 1 year. Median OS for patients with metastatic disease and locally advanced disease were 8.7 and 11.5 months, respectively. With 574 treatment cycles (median per patient, nine; range, zero to 27), grade 3/4 toxicity per patient was 11% for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, 14% for nausea or vomiting, 6.2% for diarrhea, and 11% for peripheral neuropathy, with no toxic deaths.

CONCLUSION

Palliative effects, response rate, and survival observed with this well-tolerated gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination deserve additional evaluation. A comparative study of combination therapy versus gemcitabine alone is ongoing.

Gemcitabine-based combination treatment of pancreatic cancer

Since the introduction of gemcitabine (Gemzar; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN), pancreatic cancer may no longer be regarded as a completely chemotherapy-resistant tumor. Good treatment tolerability and a low incidence of side effects are clear advantages of single-agent gemcitabine and enable its integration into combination regimens. Currently, the most widely used regimens involve combination partners such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin, and docetaxel. Combinations of gemcitabine with cisplatin or 5-FU appear comparably active and tolerable. Comparative analysis of multiple phase II studies performed with gemcitabine/cisplatin showed response rates in the range of 11.4% to 58% and median survival times of 7.4 to 10 months, whereas various gemcitabine/5-FU-based regimens achieved response rates of 3.7% to 25% and median survival times of 4.4 to 10.3 months. In view of the great variety of schedules and inconclusive treatment results, an optimal regimen for the combination of 5-FU and gemcitabine still needs to be defined. Although the combination of gemcitabine with docetaxel has demonstrated activity, data showing a clear survival benefit are not yet available. It is also premature to evaluate the activity of combinations with irinotecan or oxaliplatin. Four-drug regimens indicate a possible improvement in treatment outcome. However, their application may be limited to selected patients with good performance status.

A Phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma have a poor survival. Chemotherapy with gemcitabine is the standard first-line treatment. In a Phase II trial at one academic cancer center, the clinical safety and activity of combining gemcitabine and docetaxel were assessed.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated, advanced pancreatic carcinoma were eligible. Bidimensionally measurable disease or evaluable disease with an elevated tumor marker, good performance status, and adequate organ function were required. Patients received docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) on Day 1 and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Ciprofloxacin was administered on Days 8-18. Dose attenuations were made as indicated for toxicity. Patients were restaged radiographically after every two cycles.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were enrolled, and 33 patients were evaluable for response. There were 23 men and 10 women among the evaluable patients. The median age was 63 years, and all patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Three patients had received prior chemoradiation for postresection adjuvant therapy. One hundred forty-six cycles of chemotherapy were administered, and 5 cycles (3%) in 4 patients (12%) were complicated by febrile neutropenia. Twenty percent and 11% of patients on Day 8 and Day 15 doses of gemcitabine, respectively, were omitted for toxicity. The objective response rate was 18%, and the median survival was 8.9 months (95% confidence interval, 5.2-11.2 months). The 1-year survival rate was 29%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma is well tolerated and is associated with moderate activity despite aggressive dose reduction. Whether combination regimens are more effective than single agents in the treatment of patients with pancreatic carcinoma awaits evaluation in randomized studies.

Definitive Results of a Phase II Trial of Cisplatin, Epirubicin, Continuous-Infusion Fluorouracil, and Gemcitabine in Stage IV Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a cisplatin, epirubicin, gemcitabine, and fluorouracil (PEF-G) schedule on stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≤ 70 years, with no prior chemotherapy and with bidimensionally measurable stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2, and adequate bone marrow, kidney, and liver function were eligible for this trial. Eligibility criteria for clinical benefit assessment were pain with at least a daily analgesic consumption of two nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or Karnofsky performance status between 50 and 70. Treatment consisted of 40 mg/m2 each of cisplatin and epirubicin day 1, gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks, and fluorouracil 200 mg/m2/d as a protracted venous infusion.

RESULTS: Between April 1997 and April 1999, 49 patients from a single institution were eligible for the study. Altogether, 203 cycles (median, four cycles) of PEF-G were delivered. The objective response rate was 58% in 43 assessable patients and 51% in the intent-to-treat population. Fourteen patients had stable disease. Grade 3 or 4 World Health Organization neutropenia occurred in 51% of cycles, thrombocytopenia in 28%, anemia in 7%, stomatitis in 5%, and diarrhea, and nausea, and vomiting in 2%. The median duration of response was 8.5 months. The median time to tumor progression was 7.5 months. The median survival was 11 months in the assessable population and 10 months in the intent-to-treat population. Clinical benefit was achieved in 22 (78%) of 28 assessable patients.

CONCLUSION: PEF-G is a well-tolerated and safe regimen; it obtained a very high rate of durable responses and deserves further evaluation in a phase III trial.

Phase II trial of bimonthly leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (FOLFUGEM)

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine alone or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) according to several schedules are used for palliation of metastatic and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study was designed to test the efficacy of the leucovorin 5-FU and gemcitabine combination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II trial combined a simplified bimonthly LV5FU2 with gemcitabine: leucovorin 400 mg/m2 in a two-hour infusion, followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus and 2 or 3 g/m2 continuous infusion over 46 hours; gemcitabine 1 g/m2 was infused over 30 min on day 3 after 5-FU. Treatment was repeated every two weeks. Gemcitabine dose could be increased (250 mg/m2 every two cycles up to 1500 mg/m2) in the absence of NCI-CTC toxicity > 2.

RESULTS

Among the 62 patients included in this study, 22 had LA and 40 had metastatic disease. Objective response rate for the 54 patients with measurable disease was 25.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 14%-37.8%) and 22.6% (95% CI: 12%-33.2%) in the intent-to-treat population: the clinical benefit rate for the 59 assessable patients was 49.2%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 4.8 and 9 months, respectively, with 32.3% of patients alive at 1 year. The most frequent toxicity (grade 3-4) was neutropenia (56.5%) usually asymptomatic (1.1% febrile neutropenia), but requiring decreases of 5-FU and gemcitabine doses. Unexpected complete alopecia occurred in 97% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative effects, response rate and survival observed in this multicenter study seem to be superior to those obtained with gemcitabine or 5-FU alone, despite a limiting hematological toxicity.

26S proteasome inhibition induces apoptosis and limits growth of human pancreatic cancer

The 26S proteasome degrades proteins that regulate transcription factor activation, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis. In cancer, this may allow for uncontrolled cell division, promoting tumor growth, and spread. We examined whether selective inhibition of the 26S proteasome with PS-341, a dipeptide boronic acid analogue, would block proliferation and induce apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer. Proteasome inhibition significantly blocked mitogen (FCS) induced proliferation of BxPC3 human pancreatic cancer cells in vitro, while arresting cell cycle progression and inducing apoptosis by 24 h. Accumulation of p21(Cip1-Waf-1), a cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor normally degraded by the 26S proteasome, occurred by 3 h and correlated with cell cycle arrest. When BxPC3 pancreatic cancer xenografts were established in athymic nu/nu mice, weekly administration of 1 mg/kg PS-341 significantly inhibited tumor growth. Both cellular apoptosis and p21(Cip1-Waf-1) protein levels were increased in PS-341 treated xenografts. Inhibition of tumor xenograft growth was greatest (89%) when PS-341 was combined with the tumoricidal agent CPT-11. Combined CPT-11/PS-341 therapy, but not single agent therapy, yielded highly apoptotic tumors, significantly inhibited tumor cell proliferation, and blocked NF-kappaB activation indicating this systemic therapy was effective at the cancer cell level. 26S proteasome inhibition may represent a new therapeutic approach against this highly resistant and lethal malignancy.