Health-related quality of life outcomes of omeprazole versus ranitidine in poorly responsive symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease

Validation of the Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale, a questionnaire for symptom assessment in the functional dyspepsia/postprandial distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

A validated patient-reported outcome instrument is lacking for the functional dyspepsia/postprandial distress syndrome.

AIM

To validate the Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale (LPDS).

METHODS

The LPDS diary, comprising eight symptoms with verbal descriptors rated for severity (0-4), was derived from focus groups and cognitive debriefing. It was used in a 2-week run-in, 8-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial of itopride 100 mg t.d.s. Results in 60 patients, with concealed treatment allocation, were used to analyse LPDS content validity, consistency, reliability and responsiveness. Patients also filled out Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms (PAGI-SYM), Nepean Dyspepsia Index, overall treatment evaluation and overall symptom severity questionnaires. Construct validity was evaluated by known-group analyses and by correlating LPDS with these additional questionnaires. Minimum Clinically Important Difference was determined from threshold changes in anchor questionnaires.

RESULTS

Symptom patterns and factor analysis identified three cardinal symptoms of postprandial distress syndrome (early satiation, postprandial fullness, upper abdominal bloating), whose mean intensities generate weekly LPDS scores. Known-groups analysis showed large-effect-size differences in LPDS scores (Cohen's d = 2.16). Strong correlations (r > 0.57) between LPDS scores and relevant anchors at baseline indicate good convergent validity. Internal consistency of LPDS was good (α > 0.85) with high inter-item correlations (0.67-0.76), and test-retest reliability (r = 0.85). Changes in LPDS scores were highly convergent with changes in overall treatment evaluation, overall symptom severity and PAGI-SYM (r > 0.52). minimum clinically important difference analysis generated thresholds of 0.4-0.6.

CONCLUSIONS

The Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale, which is supported by the European Medicines Agency, is a sensitive and reliable patient-reported outcome instrument to assess symptoms in the functional dyspepsia/postprandial distress syndrome.

Development and psychometric evaluation of 2 age-stratified versions of the Pediatric GERD Symptom and Quality of Life Questionnaire

OBJECTIVES

The Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom and Quality of Life Questionnaire (PGSQ) represents 2 related age-stratified tools developed to assess pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). These include the PGSQ-Cp (for children ages 2 to 8 years, parent/caregiver report) and the PGSQ-A (for adolescents ages 9-17 years). The objective of the present study was to develop and evaluate PGSQ measurement properties.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PGSQ items were generated based on information from focus groups, expert clinician review, and cognitive debriefing interviews. The symptoms of pediatric GERD and the effect of these symptoms were addressed. The tools were evaluated in a 3-week psychometric evaluation with participants from 11 clinical sites in the United States. The study included other measures such as the Pediatric Quality of Life questionnaire (PedsQL) and clinician-rated GERD severity. After item reduction, internal consistency, reproducibility, construct validity, known-group validity, and responsiveness were assessed.

RESULTS

The 231 participants included 75 parents of children ages 2 to 8 years and 75 children ages 9 to 17 years with GERD and 41 parents of children and 40 children ages 9 to 17 years without GERD. Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated 4 symptom subscales for the PGSQ-Cp and 3 symptom subscales for the PGSQ-A. Both had subscales for total impact and school impact. High to moderate internal consistency was observed, ranging from 0.76 to 0.96 for the PGSQ-Cp and from 0.67 to 0.94 for the PGSQ-A. The PGSQ significantly differentiated between patients with GERD and controls (P < 0.0001, PGSQ-Cp; P < 0.0022-0.0001, PGSQ-A) and demonstrated responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of both versions of the PGSQ. The instruments should be useful for clinical studies.

Guidance on the use of over-the-counter proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of GERD

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper was to develop a guideline on the over-the-counter management of gastroesophageal reflux disease with proton pump inhibitors (i.e. omeprazole).

SETTING

A meeting of internationally renowned gastroenterologists in January 2009, in Berlin, Germany.

METHODS

An expert panel group of gastroenterologists convened to develop a consensus-based algorithm for pharmacists for over-the-counter (OTC) treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Key considerations were the short-term safety and efficacy of PPIs, and the extent of the risk to the sufferer, owing to the treatment not being controlled by a physician. Main outcome measures A consensus-based treatment algorithm for the OTC management of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evidence-based guidance on the use of OTC PPIs.

RESULTS

As defined by the treatment algorithm, the pharmacist should first confirm the diagnosis based on the presence of typical symptoms and secondly, as a result, rule out general practitioner referral. The third step focuses on the nature, severity and frequency of the symptoms--the patients who might have the highest benefit from a short course (14 days) of OTC PPIs are those with less than three episodes of heartburn and/or acid regurgitation per week. Patients who have three or more episodes per week can use the OTC PPIs but should also be encouraged to visit a physician, and those who already have a diagnostic work-up can use proton pump inhibitors as rescue treatment if they are known responders. Guidance for pharmacists, in the form of questions and answers, summarises the current published clinical experience with PPIs in terms of their efficacy and safety, and optimal treatment schedule. Conclusions Gastroesophageal reflux disease imposes a considerable burden on sufferers. Owing to their accepted efficacy and safety, PPIs are becoming popular as OTC options for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms such as heartburn and acid regurgitation. Effective self-management of gastroesophageal reflux disease with OTC PPIs, e.g. omeprazole, could lead to lasting freedom from symptoms and improved quality of life for sufferers.

[Use of health resources and loss of productivity in gastroesophageal reflux disease: results of a cross-sectional study in a primary care setting in Spain]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate healthcare resource use and productivity in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the influence of disease severity on these two factors.

DESIGN

Sub-analysis of the Spanish population of a multinational study with a 4-month retrospective period for the identification and selection of patients, and a clinical visit to obtain clinical information and data on use of healthcare resources, carried out between October 2007 and January 2008.

POPULATION

A total of 477 patients attending a Primary Care centre, with a medical consultation for GERD.

MAIN VARIABLES

Use of healthcare resources, changes in productivity based on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for GERD patients (WPAI-GERD).

RESULTS

Despite having received pharmacological treatment at the baseline visit, after a median of 5.1 months follow-up (range 2.1-8.1), up to 15.9% (95% CI; 12.8-19.5) patients still showed clinically relevant GERD symptoms. Direct medical costs per year associated with diagnostic tests and medical consultations in patients with or without clinically relevant GERD symptoms were 666 € (SD: 2,097 €) and 370 € (SD: 2,060 €), respectively. The mean annual cost of reduced productivity (17%) was 5,316 € (SD: 8,615 €). This cost was 4 times higher for patients with clinically relevant GERD symptoms than for patients with no relevant symptoms (15,188 € [SD: 11,206 €] vs 3,926 € [SD: 7,232 €]).

CONCLUSION

Patients with GERD use significant healthcare resources, attributable to associated medical costs and marked reduction in productivity, even though they receive pharmacological treatment.

[Study of the clinical profile and management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care in Spain]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical profile and management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in primary care.

METHODS

A multinational, multicenter study was performed comprising a 4-month retrospective phase for the screening, selection and assessment of patients who had consulted for any GERD-related cause (index visit), and a cross-sectional phase in which clinical data were recorded and the following questionnaires were administered: the Reflux Disease Questionnaire and the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Impact Scale (GIS).

RESULTS

Among the 24 participating Spanish centers, 2.7% of the patients (95% CI: 2.6-2.9) had consulted at least once because of GERD. Approximately 50% of the patients showed frequent (2 or more days a week) or moderate to severe symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation or chest pain. Although the patients received effective pharmacological treatment at the index visit, clinically relevant GERD symptoms persisted in 16% after a median follow-up of 5 months. These symptoms were associated with a strong disease impact as evaluated with the GIS.

CONCLUSION

GERD represents a substantial burden for primary care physicians. Although effective drugs are used for the treatment of this condition, clinically relevant symptoms persist in a substantial proportion of patients.

Update on health-related quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is highly prevalent in westernized countries. It damages quality of life but its effect is frequently underestimated, often leading to inadequate management of the disease and its symptoms. Health-related quality of life questionnaires are now becoming more widely recognized as an effective means of demonstrating the true impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease, both on individuals and on society at large. Health-related quality of life questionnaires can also help to underscore the importance of effective acid suppression therapy, with proton pump inhibitors, such as omeprazole and esomeprazole, for this common and highly debilitating condition. This review summarizes recent information on the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on a range of aspects of health-related quality of life, including patient well-being.

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium - current and future use in transplant patients

Mycophenolate mofetil, the morpholino ester prodrug of mycophenolic acid, is an effective immunosuppressant, although there are concerns over dose reductions and discontinuations due to gastrointestinal adverse events. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (Myfortic) was formulated to improve mycophenolic acid-related upper gastrointestinal adverse events and to deliver effective mycophenolic acid protection. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium 720 mg and mycophenolate mofetil 1000 mg are therapeutically equivalent in de novo transplant patients. Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in maintenance patients can be achieved without compromising safety and efficacy. Recent studies demonstrate the efficacy and tolerability of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in adult and pediatric renal transplant patients converted from mycophenolate mofetil, and early results also suggest that enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium can provide similar efficacy and safety as mycophenolate mofetil in de novo heart transplant patients.

Counselling by primary care physicians may help patients with heartburn-predominant uninvestigated dyspepsia

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether strategies to counsel and empower patients with heartburn-predominant dyspepsia could improve health-related quality of life.

METHODS

Using a cluster randomized, parallel group, multicentre design, nine centres were assigned to provide either basic or comprehensive counselling to patients (age range 18 to 50 years) presenting with heartburn-predominant upper gastrointestinal symptoms, who would be considered for drug therapy without further investigation. Patients were treated for four weeks with esomeprazole 40 mg once daily, followed by six months of treatment that was at the physician's discretion. The primary end point was the baseline change in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire score.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients from nine centres were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. There was a statistically significant baseline improvement in all domains of the QOLRAD questionnaire in both study arms at four and seven months (P<0.0001). After four months, the overall mean change in QOLRAD score appeared greater in the comprehensive counselling group than in the basic counselling group (1.77 versus 1.47, respectively); however, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.07). After seven months, the overall mean baseline change in QOLRAD score between the comprehensive and basic counselling groups was not statistically significant (1.69 versus 1.56, respectively; P=0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized, comprehensive counselling intervention showed a positive initial trend in improving quality of life in patients with heartburn-predominant uninvestigated dyspepsia. Further investigation is needed to confirm the potential benefits of providing patients with comprehensive counselling regarding disease management.

[Health-related quality of life issues in gastroesophageal reflux disease]

Several studies have reported significant Health-Related Quality of life (HRQOL) impairment in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients compared with the general population. The evaluation of quality of life is important as a parameter for the treatment. Because GERD has diverse symptoms such as esophageal and extraesophageal syndromes, HRQOL of GERD should be determined by both disease and non-disease related factors. The purpose is to overview the HRQOL instruments used in the evaluation of GERD, published reports regarding HRQOL in GERD, and the effects of medical treatments on GERD.

Long-term quality of life improvement in subjects with healed erosive esophagitis: treatment with lansoprazole

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic symptomatic condition and may be associated with erosive esophagitis (EE). Considerable data on the long-term maintenance of healing of EE are available, but data on long-term GERD symptom prevention and patient quality of life (QOL) are limited.

AIMS

To investigate QOL in subjects with healed EE who received 12 months of double-blind maintenance treatment with lansoprazole or ranitidine, followed by long-term open-label lansoprazole therapy to prevent recurrence of EE.

METHODS

Subjects with healed EE received 12 months of double-blind maintenance treatment with lansoprazole 15 mg once daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily, followed by dose-titrated, open-label lansoprazole therapy for up to 82 months.

RESULTS

During double-blind treatment (n = 206), lansoprazole-treated patients showed significantly (P <or= 0.05) greater improvements than ranitidine-treated patients in the frequency, severity, and 'bothersomeness' of heartburn, the symptom index, problems of activity limitation, eating and drinking problems, symptom problems, health distress, and social functioning. During dose-titrated, open-label treatment (n = 195), all disease-specific QOL scales except sleep improved significantly (P < 0.001) from open-label baseline at each time-point.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance treatment with lansoprazole for 12 months in healed EE subjects produced significantly greater improvements in QOL indicators than ranitidine. These improvements were sustained during dose-titrated, open-label lansoprazole treatment.

[Validation of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) and Gastrointestinal Impact Scale (GIS) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Spanish population]

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility, reliability, validity and sensitivity of changes in the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) and the Gastrointestinal Impact Scale (GIS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An observational, prospective, multicenter study was conducted in primary care centers on two visits (baseline and 16 days later) in a sample of patients with a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or suspicion of GERD requiring a therapeutic intervention (sensitivity to change group, n=230) and in another sample of patients with clinically controlled GERD (reliability group, n=51).

RESULTS

The RDQ questionnaire and GIS scale, both overall and for each domain, showed a Cronbach's alpha of greater than or equal to 0.70. All RDQ domains and the total score, as well as the total GIS score and impact dimension, showed a high correlation between the baseline evaluation and that performed 16 days later in stable patients. The RDQ and GIS showed very high correlations between the total scores and those of the quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia (QOLRAD) (-0.73 and 0.80, respectively), a reflux- and dyspepsia-specific quality of life scale, and a high correlation with the gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale (GSRS) (0.54 and -0.55, respectively), a general scale of gastrointestinal symptoms. Both the RDQ questionnaire and the GIS scale showed significant changes with a high effect size on improvement responses.

CONCLUSIONS

The RDQ and GIS questionnaires show very good psychometric properties, making them suitable for use in primary care.

Systematic review: health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Although gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has a well-established pathophysiology, the impact of GERD symptoms on the patients' quality of life can be profound. Therefore, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires have become standard instruments to evaluate the effect of treatment in clinical trials.

AIM

To evaluate the reliability, validity and responsiveness of available GERD-specific HRQOL.

METHODS

A systematic literature search using the Medical Subject Headings terms: 'Gastro-oesophageal reflux', 'Heartburn' and 'Oesophagitis' with 'quality of life' and 'questionnaires' was preformed to identify the available HRQOL questionnaires. To analyse the psychometric properties of the respective tools, the actual guidelines for the use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials were applied.

RESULTS

We identified five GERD-specific HRQOL questionnaires but none of them fulfilled all quality criteria; either they did not meet the actual standards for psychometric properties (HBQOL, GERD-HRQL, Jasani et al.Aust Fam Physician 1999; 28: 515), or were impracticable to use in clinical trials. The generic and hybrid instruments lack specificity and sensitivity and were not designed for treatment evaluation in GERD patients.

CONCLUSION

There is need for a new evaluative tool in the assessment of HRQOL during GERD therapy.

An international comparison of the burden of illness in patients with dyspepsia

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study investigates the symptoms and the impact of symptoms on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients consulting with dyspepsia.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of dyspepsia were recruited from primary and secondary care in Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, South Africa and Spain. Investigators assessed symptom frequency and severity, and subjects completed the following questionnaires: the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale and the Short Form 36 (SF-36).

RESULTS

853 dyspepsia patients were included. Mean GSRS scores showed that patients were most troubled by abdominal pain and indigestion. QOLRAD scores indicated that symptoms caused emotional distress, food/drink problems and reduced vitality, with a lesser effect on sleep and physical functioning. Mean SF-36 scores were lower than mean normative values for all domains, indicating that patients had a worse HRQL than the normal population, particularly for Bodily Pain, Role Physical and Role Emotional. Of patients in each country, 18-43% were anxious and 11-21% were depressed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with dyspepsia have reduced HRQL because their symptoms - particularly abdominal pain and indigestion - cause emotional distress, problems with food and drink, and impaired vitality.

Accounting for the effect of GERD symptoms on patients' health-related quality of life: supporting optimal disease management by primary care physicians

AIM

To review, from a primary care physician (PCP) perspective, the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments for assessment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms, their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and the effectiveness of therapy.

RESULTS

While generic and disease-specific PRO instruments have been used in the assessment of GERD, the latter can be considered to be more appropriate as they focus only on problems relevant to the disease in question (and therefore tend to be more responsive to change). Such instruments include the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ). Their use indicates that GERD symptoms are troublesome and significantly reduce patients' HRQL, and that effective treatment of GERD improves HRQL. The GERD Impact Scale (GIS) questionnaire, primarily developed for use within primary care, can also help to determine the impact of symptoms on patients' everyday lives and, in turn, the benefit of appropriately targeted therapy. Notably, these PRO instruments were developed from focus groups of GERD patients, and only aspects rated of highest importance are used in the final instruments. Consequently, PCPs can feel confident that these questionnaires encompass the most relevant points that they are likely to ask in terms of how symptoms affect patients' everyday lives.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care physicians are encouraged to make wider use of PRO instruments within routine practice to improve communication with their GERD patients that, in turn, could lead to improved clinical outcomes and greater patient satisfaction.

The gastro-oesophageal reflux disease impact scale: a patient management tool for primary care

BACKGROUND

Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease have a substantial impact on patients' everyday lives.

AIM

To develop and test a short questionnaire to aid patient-doctor communication.

METHODS

The Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease Impact Scale was developed from a systematic literature review, focus groups of patients and primary care physicians, and patient cognitive interviews. A psychometric validation study was conducted based on two consultations in new (n = 100) or chronic (n = 105) gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.

RESULTS

The Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease Impact Scale demonstrated internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.68 to 0.82), reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient in stable patients ranged from 0.61 to 0.72) and construct validity (Spearman correlations with Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia instrument and Reflux Disease Questionnaire: 0.5-0.8 in both patient groups). Effect sizes in new and chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients ranged from 0.9 to 1.5 and 0.32 to 0.42, respectively. Doctors reported altering their treatment decision based on information provided by the Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease Impact Scale in 35% of patients, and 77% of doctors found it to be useful.

CONCLUSIONS

The Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease Impact Scale demonstrated good psychometric properties in newly diagnosed gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients and those already receiving treatment. This simple communication tool is a useful aid for managing primary care patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Symptom assessment tools for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment

Relief of symptoms, both typical and atypical, is the mainstay of therapy for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, evaluation of GERD symptoms' response to treatment has been hampered by the lack of a questionnaire that meets all the criteria of an ideal evaluative GERD symptom assessment tool. These criteria are: sensitivity in GERD patients, covering all symptom dimensions (multidimensional construct), assessment of frequency and intensity of "typical" and "atypical" GERD symptoms, practical and economical, easy to understand, responsive over short time intervals, use as a patient self-assessment tool, amenable to daily use, psychometrically validated, and translation into many languages with cross-cultural adaptation. Thus far, 14 instruments have been developed to assess GERD symptoms and potentially can be used to evaluate treatment response during a therapeutic trial in GERD patients. However, comparison of the different evaluative tools is needed.

Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and well-being in a random sample of the general population of a Swedish community

OBJECTIVES

There is limited information on the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and well-being in the general population. This study aimed to investigate this relationship and determine the severity threshold at which reflux symptoms meaningfully affect patients' well-being.

METHODS

A random sample of the population of Malmö, Sweden (n = 4,624), was sent the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, the Subjective Symptom Assessment Profile, and the Psychological General Well-Being Index. The relationship between well-being and the severity of heartburn, acid regurgitation, stomach pain, and abdominal pain was investigated by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).

RESULTS

Complete data were obtained from 1,476 subjects (43% male; mean age [standard deviation], 49.9 [14.2] yr). The mean Psychological General Well-Being Index score was 102 (95% CI: 101-103). Increasing symptom severity was associated with a decrease in well-being, and correlations between Psychological General Well-Being Index score and symptom severity ratings were statistically significant. At least mild symptoms of heartburn or abdominal pain (a mean Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale score of > or =3) were associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in well-being (a Psychological General Well-Being Index score of less than 98).

CONCLUSIONS

Reflux symptoms are associated with impaired well-being in the general population. Individuals with symptoms that are mild or more severe report a meaningful reduction in well-being similar to that seen in other diseases. This may represent an appropriate threshold for patient selection in trials of GERD therapy and for more detailed evaluation of patients consulting with reflux symptoms in clinical practice.

Effect of esomeprazole on nighttime heartburn and sleep quality in patients with GERD: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Sleep disturbances are common in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study examined the effects of esomeprazole on nighttime heartburn, GERD-related sleep disturbances, sleep quality, work productivity, and regular activities.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included adults with GERD-associated sleep disturbances and moderate-to-severe nighttime heartburn (recorded by patient diary during screening). Patients received oral esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 220) or 20 mg (n = 226) or placebo (n = 229) once daily for 4 wk. The primary outcome was relief of nighttime heartburn. Secondary outcomes included resolution of sleep disturbances, sleep quality measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire, and work productivity measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Nighttime heartburn was relieved in 53.1% (111/209), 50.5% (111/220), and 12.7% (28/221) of patients who received esomeprazole 40 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg, and placebo, respectively. Differences (95% CI) versus placebo were 40.5% (32.4%, 48.5%) and 37.8% (29.9%, 45.7%) and were highly significant (p < 0.0001). GERD-related sleep disturbances resolved in significantly more (p < 0.0001) patients who received esomeprazole 40 (73.7%) or 20 mg (73.2%) than in those who received placebo (41.2%). Both esomeprazole groups had greater PSQI global score changes from baseline (p < 0.0001 vs placebo) and more (p < 0.0001 vs placebo) work hours saved per week per patient compared with baseline (esomeprazole 40 mg, 11.6 h; esomeprazole 20 mg, 12.3 h; placebo, 6.2 h).

CONCLUSIONS

Esomeprazole reduced nighttime heartburn and GERD-related sleep disturbances and improved sleep quality and work productivity.

Patient reported outcomes in gastroesophageal reflux disease: an overview of available measures

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common, chronic disorder. The main symptom of GERD is heartburn, although a diverse range of symptoms can be associated with the disease including acid regurgitation and epigastric pain. GERD is also a risk factor for Barrett's oesophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. The impact of GERD symptoms on patients' lives can be profound and is unrelated to the presence or absence of esophagitis. The impact of GERD can be measured by assessing the patient perspective using Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs). There are two categories of questionnaires that can be used to measure the effect of GERD on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), namely generic and disease or treatment specific. The use of PRO instruments has become more accepted in the assessment of disease treatment. Well-designed instruments that assess physical, psychological and emotional factors can provide clinicians with the data that will promote effective management decisions for the treatment of GERD. The most frequently used instruments in GERD are reviewed here, in terms of their psychometric properties.

Validation of a Quality-of-Life Instrument for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

OBJECTIVES

To establish the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a new, disease-specific assessment tool, the LPR-HRQL, which assesses patient-reported outcomes (PRO) with regard to health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

DESIGN

A prospective, open-label, repeated-measures study.

SETTING

Six centers in 4 states in the eastern United States.

PATIENTS

Patients with LPR.

INTERVENTIONS

Open-label treatment with 20 mg of omeprazole twice daily. Clinical and PRO HRQL data were collected. Several PRO instruments were administered to patients at each of several time points; these instruments included the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), a general HRQL tool; the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), a symptom-specific tool for assessing voice problems; and the QOLRAD instrument (Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia), used to assess the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

RESULTS

Factor analyses of the LPR-HRQL scales confirmed single dimensions for each. All LPR-HRQL items contributed to internal consistency of scales and had substantial variability permitting useful information. Substantial evidence of convergent and divergent validity with SF-36, VHI, and QOLRAD items was observed. Test-retest validity was adequate for the time interval tested. Changes in domain scores of the LPR-HRQL at 4 and 6 months documented its responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The LPR-HRQL displays reliability, validity, and responsiveness, has face validity, and is simple and not burdensome to administer, score, and analyze. Accordingly, it may be used to assist physicians and patients in understanding the HRQL burden of LPR and the impact of therapy.

The effect of acid suppression on sleep patterns and sleep-related gastro-oesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated that night-time gastro-oesophageal reflux affects sleep quality, and thereby impairs daytime functioning.

AIM

To determine whether treatment with a proton-pump inhibitor (rabeprazole) would improve both objective and subjective measures of sleep.

METHODS

Individuals with complaints of significant gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were studied by polysomnography and 24-h pH monitoring on two separate nights. On one occasion, participants received 20 mg rabeprazole b.d., and on another they received placebo. Both study conditions were preceded by a week of treatment with either rabeprazole or placebo. The order of treatments was randomized.

RESULTS

Rabeprazole significantly reduced overall acid reflux, but it did not significantly reduce night-time acid contact. Rabeprazole treatment significantly improved subjective indices of sleep quality. There were no significant differences on objective measures of sleep between placebo and rabeprazole treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with other studies of pharmacological treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux, subjective measures of sleep improved with heartburn medication but objective measures were not affected.

Assessing symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux disease: how well do clinicians' assessments agree with those of their patients?

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the extent of agreement between clinicians and patients regarding assessments of reflux symptom severity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from four randomized clinical trials involving 2,674 patients treated with esomeprazole, omeprazole, ranitidine, or placebo. The extent of agreement was determined for symptom severity before and after 4-8 wk of treatment, and for the absence of symptoms after treatment. Agreement was further analyzed by determining weighted kappa values, which were interpreted according to the criteria of Landis and Koch.

RESULTS

Before treatment, clinician-patient agreement regarding symptom severity in the four studies was slight to moderate (kappa: 0.17-0.53); 48-52% of assessments agreed for heartburn, 24-35% for epigastric pain, 36-43% for regurgitation, and 63% agreed for dysphagia. Poor agreement reflected clinician underestimation of symptom severity relative to patient ratings in three studies and clinician overestimation in one study. Agreement regarding symptom severity improved following treatment, and was fair to substantial (kappa: 0.31-0.73); 58-78% of assessments agreed for heartburn, 42-60% for epigastric pain, 66-76% for regurgitation, and 86% agreed for dysphagia. After treatment, agreement was greatest for patients reporting absence of symptoms and decreased with increasing severity of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The agreement between clinicians and patients in their assessments of the severity of reflux symptoms is poor, particularly before treatment and for more severe symptoms. Improvements in clinician-patient communication may help to bridge this gap, and greater reliance on patient assessments may be appropriate.

Review article: impact of night-time reflux on lifestyle - unrecognized issues in reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), manifesting with symptoms including heartburn and regurgitation, affects people during both daytime and nocturnal hours. Night-time GERD has been reported to have a greater impact on a patient's life than daytime GERD due to prolonged oesophageal acid exposure time per reflux episode. To further understand this issue, it is important to implement quality of life (QOL) measures. QOL studies are becoming increasingly important to physicians in making clinical decisions, and generic and disease-specific health-related QOL (HRQL) tools have been developed to measure a wide variety of topics. There are currently no universally accepted guidelines on how to best measure HRQL in GERD patients. It is important to note that these surveys may not yield accurate results because many GERD sufferers may feel that their symptoms are not serious enough to seek treatment. Some surveys include the GERD-HRQL assessment, the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Gallup survey. When compared with daytime GERD patients, night-time GERD patients may suffer from sleep deprivation, which in turn leads to physical and emotional problems and a poor overall QOL. Studies indicate that the prevalence and impact of night-time heartburn have been underestimated and that adequate treatment of symptoms is often not achieved. In addition, GERD greatly affects work productivity and leads to a significant economic burden on society. Although limited studies are available on the impact of pharmacological treatment on GERD QOL, recent findings indicate that proton pump inhibitors are more effective than H(2)-receptor antagonists for the improvement of overall QOL.

Responsiveness and interpretation of a symptom severity index specific to upper gastrointestinal disorders

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Determining clinically meaningful change of patient-reported outcome measures is important for evaluating effectiveness of treatments for gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. This study evaluates responsiveness of the Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dyspepsia.

METHODS

The PAGI-SYM was based on a review of the published literature and interviews with patients and clinicians. Items were developed to be linguistically and culturally appropriate for multicountry studies. The PAGI-SYM includes 6 subscales: heartburn/regurgitation, fullness/early satiety, nausea/vomiting, bloating, upper abdominal pain, and lower abdominal pain. Subjects with GERD (n = 810) or dyspepsia (n = 767) participated in this multicountry, observational study. All subjects completed the PAGI-SYM, a global symptom relief questionnaire, and a measure of patient-rated change in GI-related symptoms, the Overall Treatment Effect (OTE) scale. Responsiveness was evaluated at 8 weeks by comparing groups by disease, symptom relief, and OTE (improved, stable, and worsened).

RESULTS

Subjects reporting symptom relief reported significantly lower (better) PAGI-SYM scores than those reporting no symptom relief ( P < 0.0001 to P < 0.0005). Subjects with improvements in overall GI symptoms exhibited significant decreases in PAGI-SYM subscale scores compared with those who remained the same or worsened (all P values < 0.0001). Effect sizes ranged from 0.21-1.28, and standard errors of measurement ranged from 0.29-0.63, depending on subscale and disease sample.

CONCLUSIONS

The PAGI-SYM is a brief symptom severity instrument that measures common GI symptoms. Results suggest that the PAGI-SYM is responsive and sensitive to change in clinical status in subjects with GERD or dyspepsia.

Evidence-based assessment of the efficacy of esomeprazole for the healing of erosive esophagitis

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is generally a lifelong illness that affects many people. Erosive esophagitis can occur in up to 65% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and more seriously, esophageal stricture, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma, can develop. The severity of symptoms is not a reliable indicator of the severity of erosive esophagitis and although endoscopy is the preferred method to diagnose and grade erosive esophagitis, its routine use is not practical. Therefore, early initiation of treatment with the most effective agent for treating this disease is a practical and logical strategy. Proton pump inhibitor therapy is preferred for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. This review provides a quantitative assessment of the efficacy of esomeprazole (Nexium, AstraZeneca), the most effective agent currently available.

The impact of laryngopharyngeal reflux on patient-reported quality of life

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The objectives were to assess patient-reported outcomes, specifically, the health-related quality of life of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux, and to compare those reported levels with the health-related quality of life of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and a general population.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

METHODS

As part of a prospective study to validate a health-related quality of life instrument for laryngopharyngeal reflux, patient-reported data were collected before the initiation of therapy. Use of the Short Form-36 (SF-36), a generic instrument, allowed the health-related quality of life of the patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux to be compared with benchmarks existing for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and a general U.S. population.

RESULTS

The 117 patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux often reported multiple symptoms, most frequently, chronic throat-clearing (85.5%), globus (82.1%), and hoarseness (80.3%). Their mean health-related quality of life was statistically significantly worse than that of a general U.S. population in seven of the eight SF-36 domains. The most dramatic differences between patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux and the general population were in social functioning and bodily pain (P <.001). Mean scores for patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux were significantly lower than those for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in social functioning (P <.001) and vitality (P =.0017). In five of the six remaining domains, patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux reported lower mean scores than did patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but those differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The study's assessment of health-related quality of life suggests that laryngopharyngeal reflux has a significant negative impact on the lives of patients. Although its impact is similar in some respects to that of gastroesophageal reflux disease, laryngopharyngeal reflux has a more significant impact on patients' social functioning and vitality.

Systematic review: do we need a new gastro-oesophageal reflux disease questionnaire?

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is highly prevalent in Western countries. Because the majority of patients do not present with endoscopic abnormalities, the assessment of the symptom severity and quality of life, and their response to treatment, has become increasingly important. Self-assessed symptom questionnaires are now key instruments in clinical trials.

AIM

To evaluate the validity of available GERD measurement tools.

METHODS

An ideal GERD symptom assessment instrument, suitable as a primary end-point for clinical trials, should possess the following characteristics: (i) be sensitive in patients with GERD; (ii) cover the frequency and intensity of typical and atypical GERD symptoms; (iii) be multidimensional (cover all symptom dimensions); (iv) have proven psychometric properties (validity, reliability and responsiveness); (v) be practical and economical; (vi) be self-assessed; (vii) use 'word pictures' which are easy to understand for patients; (viii) respond rapidly to changes (responsiveness over short time intervals); (ix) be used daily to assess changes during and after therapy; and (x) be valid in different languages for international use.

RESULTS

A literature review revealed five scales that met some of the above characteristics, but did not fulfil all criteria.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for a new evaluative tool for the assessment of GERD symptoms and their response to therapy.

Improving health-related quality of life in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common, chronic disorder that can progress to erosive or ulcerative oesophagitis and other complications. Uncomplicated GORD can be defined using criteria that combine symptom assessment and the impact of symptoms on well being or quality of life. The extent of impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in GORD patients has been evaluated using generic HRQL questionnaires, GORD-specific quality of life questionnaires or a combination of the two types of instruments. The impact of GORD on HRQL in affected individuals is proportional to the frequency and severity of heartburn, and is greater than that associated with many other chronic diseases. In the treatment of GORD, the goal should be complete symptom resolution as this has been shown to be associated with a clinically significant improvement in HRQL. Both drug treatment and surgical intervention have been successful in improving HRQL of patients with GORD when complete symptom resolution can be attained.

Health-related quality of life improves with treatment-related GERD symptom resolution after adjusting for baseline severity

Severity and frequency of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) related symptoms are associated with impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL). This study evaluated the association between baseline heartburn severity and endpoint HRQL of patients treated for heartburn and the relationship between complete resolution of heartburn symptoms and HRQL outcomes after controlling for baseline severity. We completed a secondary analysis of clinical symptom and HRQL data from three clinical trials in adult patients receiving either omeprazole or ranitidine treatment for GERD. HRQL was assessed using the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB) in each of the three clinical trials, and two of the trials also included the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep disturbance scale. Gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated using either the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale or a modified version of the scale. Baseline heartburn severity (none/minor, mild, moderate or severe) was defined based on patient-reported symptoms. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models were used to compare mean HRQL scores by baseline level of heartburn symptom severity and whether or not patients experienced complete heartburn resolution. At baseline, PGWB scores were significantly worse (p < 0.05) for patients with more severe heartburn symptoms. There were no statistically significant baseline severity by symptom resolution interactions in any of the ANCOVA models. For all three trials and across all follow-up assessments, mean PGWB scores were statistically significantly higher for patients with completely resolved heartburn symptoms versus those whose symptoms were unresolved (all p-values < 0.05). Few significant effects were observed for sleep disturbance scores. While the severity of heartburn symptoms at the start of medical treatment for GERD is not associated with improvements in HRQL in subsequent weeks of treatment, complete resolution of symptoms is associated with improvements in psychological well-being.

Development and validation of a disease-specific treatment satisfaction questionnaire for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Currently, no disease-specific, patient-based, treatment satisfaction instruments related to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease exist.

AIM

To develop and validate a treatment satisfaction questionnaire for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (TSQ-G).

METHODS

A new questionnaire was developed from patient focus groups, clinician input and literature review. A validation study was conducted in treated gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients. Ancillary measures included the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, Socially Desirable Response Scale, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18 and physician and patient measures of symptoms and satisfaction. Statistical analyses included exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, intra-class correlations, analyses of variance and t-tests.

RESULTS

A total of 198 gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients participated in the study, with a mean age of 50.7 years, 68% female and 84% Caucasian. The physician-rated severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was mild (32%), moderate (50%) and severe (18%); 83% were on proton pump inhibitors. The final TSQ-G consisted of 28 items with seven sub-scales; Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.58 to 0.94. Correlations with the expected sub-scales of the ancillary measures were moderate to strong. The TSQ-G sub-scales discriminated significantly between levels of physician-rated disease severity, symptom days and patient and physician ratings of satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The TSQ-G has excellent reliability and construct validity and appears to be a useful tool for the evaluation of treatment satisfaction in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.

Quality of life in relation to symptoms in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-- an analysis based on the ProGERD initiative

AIMS

To determine the impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on the quality of life, to assess changes in the quality of life during treatment with esomeprazole and to define factors that can predict these changes.

METHODS

Patients with GERD (n=6215) were included in a prospective cohort study (ProGERD). All patients underwent endoscopy and received esomeprazole. At baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment, symptoms and quality of life were assessed. Factors that influenced changes in the quality of life were determined by multiple regression analyses.

RESULTS

At baseline, the quality of life in GERD patients was lower than that in the general population, and was similar to that in patients after acute coronary events. No differences in symptoms or quality of life were observed between the subgroups of patients with non-erosive GERD, erosive GERD and Barrett's oesophagus. After treatment with esomeprazole, the symptoms and quality of life were improved in all subscales within 2 weeks (P<0.001). The mean score of the disease-specific quality of life instrument (Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia Patients) increased from 4.6 to 6.2 points, representing a highly relevant clinical improvement. The generic quality of life (SF-36) reached levels similar to those in the general population, but, again, no difference was found between the three different subgroups of GERD patients. The main factors associated with an improvement in the quality of life after treatment were symptom relief, severe erosive reflux disease, absence of extra-oesophageal disorders, avoidance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake and positive Helicobacter pylori status.

CONCLUSIONS

GERD causes a significant impairment in the quality of life that can be attenuated or normalized within a time period as short as 2 weeks by treatment with esomeprazole. These findings were similar across the whole GERD patient spectrum.

Development and validation of a patient-assessed gastroparesis symptom severity measure: the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index

BACKGROUND

Patient-based symptom assessments are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of medical treatments for gastroparesis.

AIM

To summarize the development and measurement qualities of the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), a new measure of gastroparesis-related symptoms.

METHODS

The GCSI was based on reviews of the medical literature, clinician interviews and patient focus groups. The measurement qualities (i.e. reliability, validity) of the GCSI were examined in 169 gastroparesis patients. Patients were recruited from seven clinical centres in the USA to participate in this observational study. Patients completed the GCSI, SF-36 Health Survey and disability day questions at a baseline visit and again after 8 weeks. Clinicians independently rated the severity of the patients' symptoms, and both clinicians and patients rated the change in gastroparesis-related symptoms over the 8-week study.

RESULTS

The GCSI consists of three sub-scales: post-prandial fullness/early satiety, nausea/vomiting and bloating. The internal consistency reliability was 0.84 and the test-re-test reliability was 0.76 for the GCSI total score. Significant relationships were observed between the clinician-assessed symptom severity and the GCSI total score, and significant associations were found between the GCSI scores and SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores and restricted activity and bed disability days. Patients with greater symptom severity, as rated by clinicians, reported greater symptom severity on the GCSI. The GCSI total scores were responsive to changes in overall gastroparesis symptoms as assessed by clinicians (P = 0.0002) and patients (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study indicate that the GCSI is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the symptom severity in patients with gastroparesis.

The impact of treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life: a literature review

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is common in the general population and is diagnosed based on patient-reported symptoms and clinical tests. Although clinical tests are available, significant percentages of patients report symptoms of heartburn and reflux despite negative endoscopies, and 24-hour pH tests are not often used by primary-care physicians in diagnosis. Consequently, patient-reported symptoms and health-related QOL (HR-QOL) are important in assessing treatment outcome. HR-QOL is significantly impaired in patients with GORD, and HR-QOL is associated with symptom severity and changes in GORD-related symptoms. The objective of this literature review is to examine the impact of pharmacological treatment on HR-QOL in patients with GORD. Generic and disease-specific HR-QOL measures have been used in clinical trials to evaluate the impact of GORD on patient functioning and well-being. The Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) Index and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) have been used in several clinical trials of treatment for GORD and have consistently shown that HR-QOL improves with successful therapy. These trials have been conducted primarily with two pharmacological agents, omeprazole and ranitidine. On the Heartburn-specific Quality of Life questionnaire, patients treated with ranitidine reported better HR-QOL after treatment compared with placebo therapy. In two clinical trials where omeprazole and ranitidine were compared, patients treated with omeprazole reported significantly better HR-QOL (based on the PGWB Index) than those treated with ranitidine; however, 2 other trials did not detect significant differences between the treatments. Results from clinical trials using disease-specific measures (Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index [GIQLI] and Heartburn-specific Quality of Life questionnaire) demonstrate similar findings, supporting the association between treatment-related symptom resolution and improvements in HR-QOL. The GIQLI was used in a trial comparing pantoprazole and ranitidine, where results favoured pantoprazole therapy. Several studies have demonstrated that resolution of GORD symptoms is associated with improvement in HR-QOL. Although there is evidence that treatment for GORD does improve symptoms and HR-QOL outcomes, further research is needed to more completely understand the value of medical therapy for GORD.

Mid- and long-term quality of life assessments after laparoscopic fundoplication and refundoplication: a single unit review of more than 500 antireflux procedures

BACKGROUND

For the evaluation of surgical interventions, quality of life data are being increasingly used as an efficacy endpoint.

AIMS

To evaluate impact of laparoscopic fundoplication and laparoscopic refundoplication on quality of life as well as on patient satisfaction with the procedure for at least 5 years after surgical intervention.

PATIENTS

After more than 500 laparoscopic antireflux procedures, quality of life data have been prospectively reviewed and data compared with healthy individuals, untreated gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients (n = 150) and successfully treated patients (n = B4) under adequate omeprazole therapy.

METHODS

Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index has been used in all patients and evaluated the day before surgery and 5 times after surgery. Moreover, the SF-36 questionnaire has been used up to 2 years after surgical intervention, but only in patients who underwent laparoscopic redo-surgery (n = 49).

RESULTS

In both surgical groups, mean preoperative Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index showed a significant (p < 0.01) impairment (before laparoscopic antireflux surgery: 90.4 +/- 10.3 points; before redo-surgery: 84.3 +/- 8.1 points) when compared with healthy individuals (mean: 122.6 +/- 8.5 points) and successfully treated patients with acid-suppressive therapy (mean: 121.4 +/- 9.2 points). After surgery, the mean Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index increased significantly and remained stable for at least 5 years after laparoscopic antireflux surgery (120.8 +/- 8.6 points) or for at least 2 years after redo-proce-dure (120.9 +/- 7.2 points). Before laparoscopic refundoplication, 6 out of 8 SF-36 scores were significantly p < 0.05) decreased. Redo-surgery influenced these 6 scores significantly (p < 0.05-0.01), resulting in values comparable to those of general population. Patients' satisfaction with surgery was excellent or good in 95%.

CONCLUSION

Both, laparoscopic fundoplication as well as laparoscopic refundoplication are able to improve patients' quality of life significantly for at least 5 years. Therefore, quality of life data provide useful information to discuss different treatment options with patients.

Matrix metalloproteinase-7 is expressed by pancreatic cancer precursors and regulates acinar-to-ductal metaplasia in exocrine pancreas

In gastrointestinal epithelium, metaplastic conversion between predominant cell types is associated with an increased risk of neoplasia. However, the mechanisms regulating metaplastic transitions in adult epithelia are largely undefined. Here we show that matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) is expressed not only in the majority of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma specimens, but also in human pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and metaplastic duct lesions in human and mouse. In a mouse model of pancreatic acinar-to-ductal metaplasia, MMP-7 progressively accumulates during the metaplastic transition, resulting in a concomitant increase in solubilization of Fas ligand (FasL). Under identical conditions, mice either deficient in MMP-7 or carrying an inactive FasL gene are severely inhibited in development of progressive metaplasia and acinar cell apoptosis. Thus, MMP-7 and FasL influence the initiation and maintenance of metaplastic events in pancreatic epithelium, explaining the observed link between metaplasia and apoptosis in pancreas and other gastrointestinal tissues.

Symptom and health-related quality-of-life measures for use in selected gastrointestinal disease studies: a review and synthesis of the literature

Patient-rated symptom and health-related quality-of-life (HR-QOL) outcomes are important end-points for clinical trials of medical treatments for gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. Based on this review, patient outcomes research is focused on gastroesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia, with a growing interest in irritable bowel syndrome but little research in gastroparesis. State-of-the-art for patient-rated symptom scales is rudimentary with an abundance of scales and little attention to systematic instrument development or comprehensive psychometric evaluation. Generally, disease-specific HR-QOL measures have been more systematically developed and evaluated psychometrically, but few have been incorporated into clinical trials. More comprehensive outcome assessments are needed to determine the effectiveness of new medical treatments for functional GI disorders. Future clinical trials of GI disorders should combine clinician assessments of outcomes and symptoms with patient-rated symptom and HR-QOL end-points.

Digestive system disorders: gastroesophageal reflux disease

This article comes from Clinical Evidence (1999; 1 : 145-153), a new resource for clinicians produced jointly by the BMJ Publishing Group and the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine. Clinical Evidence is an extensively peer-reviewed publication that summarizes the best available evidence on the effects of common clinical interventions gleaned from thorough searches and appraisal of the world literature. It became available in the United States late last year. Please see advertisement for more information or, alternatively, visit the web site at www. evidence.org.

Does better functional result equate with better quality of life? Implications for surgical treatment in familial adenomatous polyposis

PURPOSE

The main impetus for a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis to choose colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis over ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the better functional result. However, does better functional result necessarily translate into better overall quality of life? Previous studies of other diseases have demonstrated no such correlation. This study was performed to determine whether any relationship exists between functional result and quality of life in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after ileorectal anastomosis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

METHODS

All patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who underwent colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis from 1980 to 1998 were studied. Functional data were obtained by questionnaire. Health-related quality of life was assessed by two validated instruments, the SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales and the SF-36 Health Survey, which measure physical and mental functioning and eight separate health-quality dimensions, including health perception, physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, mental health, bodily pain, and energy or fatigue.

RESULTS

Data were obtained in 44 of 68 patients, 14 with ileorectal anastomosis and 30 with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. No differences were demonstrated between the two groups for patient age, mean follow-up time, and mean patient age at operation. Functional results were worse for the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis group vs. the ileorectal anastomosis group in number of bowel movements per day (7.5 vs. 5.2; P < 0.05), leakage (43 vs. 0 percent; P < 0.01), pad usage (17 vs. 0 percent; P < 0.01), perianal skin problems (33 vs. 7 percent; P < 0.01), food avoidance (80 vs. 43 percent; P < 0.01), and inability to distinguish gas (37 vs. 7 percent; P < 0.01). Results of the health-related quality-of-life surveys, however, demonstrated no difference between the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis groups. The Physical and Mental summary scales for the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis groups were not significantly different (Physical Health Scale, 50.3 vs. 50.9; Mental Health Scale, 51.7 vs. 49.6), and none of the eight dimensions of the SF-36 health survey demonstrated statistical differences between the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis groups.

CONCLUSION

Better functional results were not equated with better quality of life in this pilot study. Although patients with the ileorectal anastomosis have better functional results than those with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, the measured health-related quality of life as determined by a validated generic health-related quality-of-life instrument is the same for both groups. These results suggest that all patients with familial adenomatous polyposis might be optimally treated with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. More importantly, this study suggests that health-related quality of life should play a greater role in the evaluation of care and treatment in colon rectal surgery.

Complete resolution of heartburn symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Medical treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) vary in their ability to completely resolve heartburn and other symptoms. Although GERD reduces health-related quality of life (HRQL) little is known about the relationship between resolution of heartburn symptoms with medical therapy and HRQL. We evaluated the association between complete resolution of heartburn symptoms and functioning and well-being in three samples of patients with GERD.

METHODS

We analysed baseline and follow-up assessments of heartburn symptoms and HRQL scores from three clinical trials (total n=1351) comparing omeprazole and ranitidine for acute symptomatic treatment of GERD. Heartburn symptoms were measured using patient diaries and/or patient self-report. HRQL was assessed using the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB) in all three clinical trials and the SF-36 Health Survey in two clinical trials. Resolution of heartburn symptoms was defined as no heartburn reported during the assessment period.

RESULTS

We observed statistically significant differences favouring patients with no heartburn symptoms on the PGWB total score (P=0.018 to P < 0.0001) and anxiety (P=0.002 to P < 0.0001), general health (P=0.05 to P < 0. 0001), positive well-being (P=0.028 to P < 0.0001) and vitality (P=0. 05 to P < 0.0001) sub-scale scores at 4-14 weeks. Patients with no heartburn reported better SF-36 pain (P=0.005 to P < 0.0001) and general health perceptions (P=0.032 to P < 0.0001) compared with patients still experiencing heartburn symptoms at 4-24 weeks. SF-36 physical component summary scores were significantly better in patients with no heartburn symptoms compared with patients with heartburn symptoms at 4-24 weeks (P=0.013 to P=0.009), while mental component summary scores were only significantly different at 24 weeks (P=0.0005) in one of the two studies where the SF-36 was utilized.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete resolution of heartburn symptoms was consistently associated with improvement in HRQL; the greatest impact was observed on measures of psychological well-being and physical functioning and well-being. Effective treatment of GERD that completely resolves heartburn results in clinically significant improvement in patient HRQL.

Health-related quality of life in primary care patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical characteristics and health-related quality of life of family medicine patients with clinically diagnosed gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

The study involved the baseline assessment of 268 patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial comparing treatments for GERD. The study was conducted in a five-center, university-based family practice in southeastern West Virginia. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of GERD and who had not received treatment in the past 30 days were eligible; pregnant and lactating women and patients with severe renal or hepatic insufficiency were excluded.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-eight patients were included in the analysis. Mean +/- SD age was 44.9 +/- 14.1 years; 61.2% were women and 91.4% were white. Mean +/- SD body mass index was 30.3 +/- 6 kg/m2, and >15.3% of patients had no insurance. One hundred seventy-four (64.9%) patients were enrolled from nonurban primary care clinics. One hundred sixty-four patients (61.2%) were prescribed at least one medication prior to study enrollment (mean +/- SD 2.88 +/- 1.71; range 1-9). When adjusted for age, gender, comorbidity status, and rural status, severity of GERD was associated with decreased health-related quality of life. GERD patients without comorbidity demonstrated decrements in health-related quality of life when compared with the US general population. When compared with another GERD population, the study patients reported fairly consistent GERD symptomatology and health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

GERD symptom severity was associated with impaired health-related quality of life in a predominantly rural primary care population.