Preferences for herpes zoster vaccination among adults aged 50 years and older in the United States: results from a discrete choice experiment

BACKGROUND

Most adults, and disproportionately fewer African-Americans, have not received herpes zoster (HZ) vaccination despite current recommendations. This study (GSK study identifiers: 208677/HO-17-18066) assessed HZ vaccination preferences among adults aged ≥ 50 years.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this discrete choice experiment, respondents chose among a 'no vaccine' option and two HZ vaccine profiles, characterized by seven attributes, in a series of choice questions. Random-parameters logit results were used to predict likely vaccine uptake. Subgroup and latent class analysis of African-American's preferences were performed.

RESULTS

The preference weight for choosing HZ vaccines over no vaccine was statistically significant among the 1,454 respondents (71.9% whites; 25.2% African-Americans). Out-of-pocket (OOP) cost and vaccine effectiveness (VE) were the most important attributes. The African-American and the non-African-American subgroups had statistically significant differences in preferences (χ² = 59.91, p < 0.001), mainly driven by OOP cost and VE. Latent class analysis identified three groups of African-American respondents with systematically different preferences; two comprised likely-vaccinators, with one being more cost sensitive at lower price thresholds, and one likely non-vaccinators.

CONCLUSIONS

For all respondents, HZ vaccine choices were most sensitive to total OOP cost, followed by VE.

Validation of a Quality-of-Life Instrument for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

OBJECTIVES

To establish the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a new, disease-specific assessment tool, the LPR-HRQL, which assesses patient-reported outcomes (PRO) with regard to health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

DESIGN

A prospective, open-label, repeated-measures study.

SETTING

Six centers in 4 states in the eastern United States.

PATIENTS

Patients with LPR.

INTERVENTIONS

Open-label treatment with 20 mg of omeprazole twice daily. Clinical and PRO HRQL data were collected. Several PRO instruments were administered to patients at each of several time points; these instruments included the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), a general HRQL tool; the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), a symptom-specific tool for assessing voice problems; and the QOLRAD instrument (Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia), used to assess the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

RESULTS

Factor analyses of the LPR-HRQL scales confirmed single dimensions for each. All LPR-HRQL items contributed to internal consistency of scales and had substantial variability permitting useful information. Substantial evidence of convergent and divergent validity with SF-36, VHI, and QOLRAD items was observed. Test-retest validity was adequate for the time interval tested. Changes in domain scores of the LPR-HRQL at 4 and 6 months documented its responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The LPR-HRQL displays reliability, validity, and responsiveness, has face validity, and is simple and not burdensome to administer, score, and analyze. Accordingly, it may be used to assist physicians and patients in understanding the HRQL burden of LPR and the impact of therapy.

The impact of laryngopharyngeal reflux on patient-reported quality of life

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The objectives were to assess patient-reported outcomes, specifically, the health-related quality of life of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux, and to compare those reported levels with the health-related quality of life of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and a general population.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

METHODS

As part of a prospective study to validate a health-related quality of life instrument for laryngopharyngeal reflux, patient-reported data were collected before the initiation of therapy. Use of the Short Form-36 (SF-36), a generic instrument, allowed the health-related quality of life of the patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux to be compared with benchmarks existing for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and a general U.S. population.

RESULTS

The 117 patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux often reported multiple symptoms, most frequently, chronic throat-clearing (85.5%), globus (82.1%), and hoarseness (80.3%). Their mean health-related quality of life was statistically significantly worse than that of a general U.S. population in seven of the eight SF-36 domains. The most dramatic differences between patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux and the general population were in social functioning and bodily pain (P <.001). Mean scores for patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux were significantly lower than those for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in social functioning (P <.001) and vitality (P =.0017). In five of the six remaining domains, patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux reported lower mean scores than did patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but those differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The study's assessment of health-related quality of life suggests that laryngopharyngeal reflux has a significant negative impact on the lives of patients. Although its impact is similar in some respects to that of gastroesophageal reflux disease, laryngopharyngeal reflux has a more significant impact on patients' social functioning and vitality.