Specimen retrieval in laparoscopic colon surgery

Preliminary surgical outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transrectal specimen extraction: a propensity score matching study of 120 cases (with video)

Background

Compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has many advantages. Laparoscopic right colectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction has been reported, but the safety and feasibility of transrectal specimen extraction in male patients with ascending colon cancer remain to be verified. This study aimed to preliminarily evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transrectal specimen extraction.

Methods

The study was conducted at a single tertiary medical center in China. A total of 494 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic right colectomy between September 2018 and September 2020 were included. Transrectal specimen extraction was performed in 40 male patients (the NOSES group). Patients in the NOSES group were matched to the conventional laparoscopic group using propensity score matching at a 1:2 ratio. Short-term and long-term outcomes between the two groups were compared and evaluated.

Results

Forty patients in the NOSES group and 80 patients in the conventional laparoscopic group were matched for analysis. Baseline characteristics were balanced after propensity matching. The operative features, including operating time, intraoperative bleeding, and the number of harvested lymph nodes, were statistically comparable in both groups. In terms of post-operative recovery, patients in the NOSES group showed preferable outcomes, as evidenced by less post-operative pain and faster return to flatus, defecation, and discharge. The post-operative complications rate, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system, was similar in both groups. No differences in overall survival or disease-free survival were observed between the two groups.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic right colectomy with transrectal specimen extraction is oncologically safe. Compared with conventional laparoscopic right colectomy, it can reduce post-operative pain, accelerate post-operative recovery, shorten the hospital stay, and achieve better cosmetic effect.

Is natural orifice specimen extraction surgery the future direction of minimally invasive colorectal surgery?

As science and technology have advanced, surgical techniques have become increasingly sophisticated. A revolution was triggered by the appearance of new electrical and optical instruments, shifting the field of surgery in the direction of "minimally invasive" and "noninvasive" procedures. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery has emerged as a rising star in the field of minimally invasive surgery. It has increased rapidly, and it has become a hot topic in recent years. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery has shown advantages in alleviating postoperative pain, improving bowel movements, providing a cosmetic effect, and improving psychological state without adversely affecting cancer outcomes. Different approaches have been classified and summarized for natural orifice specimen extraction surgery based on the procedure for specimen extraction and the location of the tumor, and natural orifice specimen extraction surgery can be used in resection all parts of the colorectum. The international natural orifice specimen extraction surgery consensus and monograph have also been published to improve the standardization of the application of this technique. Additional steps need to be taken to standardize natural orifice specimen extraction surgery, such as conducting large-scale randomized controlled trials, establishing a training system, and developing specific tools. Still, the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery procedure continues to follow the development of minimally invasive surgery and may be one of the future treatment options.

Combination of laparoscopic side-to-end colorectal anastomosis and vaginal nose (natural orifice specimen extraction) surgery for colorectal endometriosis: Technique and outcomes

Objective:

To investigate the effectiveness of combining side-to-end anastomosis and vaginal NOSE (Natural orifice specimen extraction) surgery in colorectal endometriosis.

Material and methods:

We included 11 patients treated with laparoscopic side-to-end colorectal anastomosis and vaginal NOSE surgery between January 2019 and May 2021. We questioned the visual analog score (VAS) for pain symptoms, the short form-36 (SF-36) for health survey questionnaire, The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), EHP-5 for endometriosis health profile, The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), OAB-V8 for overactive bladder symptoms and Constipation Severity Instrument (CSI).

Results:

VAS, EHP-5, and SF-36 scores were better at postoperative third and sixth months than preoperative values ( p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in terms of FSFI, OAB-V8, HADS, and the CSI.

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic side-to-end anastomosis with vaginal NOSE surgery is feasible, scarless, and could be offered to patients with deep symptomatic bowel endometriosis.

The feasibility, safety and short-term clinical efficacy of laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer with left colonic artery (LCA) preservation and natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE)

BACKGROUND

Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has the advantages of less postoperative pain, fast bowel function recovery, reduced hospital stay and better cosmetic effects. In our centre, anterior resection of rectal cancer with preservation of the left colonic artery (LCA) was performed using NOSES. The feasibility, safety and short-term clinical efficacy of the technique were discussed.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 19 patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer with left colonic artery preservation and natural orifice specimen extraction in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Center of Sichuan Cancer Hospital from September 2018 to December 2019. General information about the patients, perioperative data and short-term postoperative results were analysed.

RESULTS

All operations were completed smoothly, with an average operation duration of 304.36 ± 45.04 min, intraoperative bleeding of 76.31 ± 61.12 ml, first time off bed of 14.42 ± 3.56 h, first time to anus exhaust of 15.26 ± 8.92 h, first time to liquid diet of 2.94 ± 1.12 days, and average postoperative stay of 10.21 ± 3.13 days. Two patients developed temporary intestinal obstruction, and one patient developed pulmonary infection. All of them recovered well after active supportive treatment and were successfully discharged.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic NOSES for rectal cancer with left colon artery preservation is safe and feasible, with satisfactory short-term results, and is worthy of further clinical investigation.

Two-Year Follow-Up of the First Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) Case Performed in Community Hospital in Hawai'i: A Case Report and Literature Review

Surgical management of rectal cancer has evolved with the advent of total mesorectal excision (TME) and neo-adjuvant treatment allowing for more sphincter-preserving proctectomies. The laparoscopic approach to TME has numerous advantages over the open approach, including faster recovery, fewer wound complications, and overall reduced morbidity. However, laparoscopic dissection around the distal portion of the rectum is particularly difficult, and thus makes achieving TME completeness and negative resection margins for low rectal tumors a challenge. Transanal TME (TaTME) is designed to overcome these difficulties. It is performed in addition to laparoscopic operation as a bottom-up approach facilitating dissection around the distal rectum. More importantly, TaTME has been shown to have the potential to improve oncological outcomes of minimally-invasive sphincter-preserving proctectomy by providing better TME specimen quality and resection margins. Although interest in TaTME has been growing worldwide, the technique is still relatively new, and adoption into routine practice may be challenging. Potential criteria for successful adoption of the TaTME technique include experience in laparoscopic rectal resection and transanal minimally-invasive surgery (TAMIS), cadaveric TaTME training, and a multidisciplinary approach to selection and management of patients with rectal cancer. Once these criteria are met, gradual and careful implementation of TaTME could be feasible. This report describes the 2-year follow-up of the first TaTME case in Hawai'i managed by a multidisciplinary oncological team in a community hospital setting.

The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic NOSE for sigmoid and rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery with natural orifice specimen extraction (La-NOSE) is being performed more frequently for the minimally invasive management of sigmoid and rectal cancer. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical and oncological safety and efficacy of La-NOSE versus conventional laparoscopy (CL).

METHODS

A search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed for studies that compared clinical or oncological outcomes of conventional laparoscopic resection using NOSE with conventional laparoscopic resection for sigmoid and rectal cancer.

RESULTS

Compared with CL group, the length of hospital stay and the pain score on the first day were shorter in the La-Nose group. The La-NOSE group had a lower incidence of total perioperative complications (OR 0.46; 95% CI [0.32 to 0.66]; I² = 0%; P < 0.0001) and a lower incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) (OR 0.11; 95% CI [0.04 to 0.29]; I² = 0%; P < 0.0001) than the CL group, while the anastomotic leakage showed no significant difference between the La-Nose group and the CL group (P = 0.19). 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) were no significant difference between the La-Nose group and the CL group (P = 0.43, P = 0.40, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

La-NOSE can achieve oncological and surgical safety comparable to that of CL for patients with sigmoid and rectal cancer. La-NOSE in patients was associated with a shorter hospital stay, shorter time to first flatus or defecation, less postoperative pain, and fewer surgical site infections (SSIs) and total perioperative complications. In general, the operative time in La-NOSE was longer than that in CL. The long-term oncological efficacy of La-NOSE seems to be equivalent to that of CL.

A case of vaginal recurrence following laparoscopic left-sided colon cancer resection combined with transvaginal specimen extraction

Here, we presented a case of laparoscopic colon cancer resection who developed vaginal recurrence after transvaginal specimen extraction. To our knowledge, this is the first case report on natural orifice specimen extraction-site cancer recurrence. A 59-year-old female underwent laparoscopic left hemicolectomy due to left-sided colon adenocarcinoma, and the specimen was removed through the vagina. She was admitted to the hospital with the complaint of vaginal discharge after 1 year. Tumoural infiltration on the posterior vaginal wall was diagnosed, and biopsy was reported as adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingooferectomy and en bloc resection of the posterior vaginal wall due to the local recurrence of colon cancer. She had no recurrence or metastasis within the 3^rd year after primary tumour surgery. Recurrence at the specimen extraction site after natural orifice surgery should be considered among the complications. For this reason, incision-preserving methods should not be neglected.

Natural orifice specimen extraction in colorectal surgery: patient selection and perspectives

Over the past 30 years, colorectal surgery has evolved to include minimally invasive surgical techniques. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with reduced postoperative pain, reduced wound complications, earlier return of bowel function, and possibly shorter length of hospital stay. These benefits have been attributed to a reduction in operative trauma compared to open surgery. The need to extract the specimen in colorectal operations through a “mini-laparotomy” can negate many of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is the opening of a hollow viscus that already communicates with the outside world, such as the vagina or distal gastrointestinal tract, in order to remove a specimen. The premise of this technique is to reduce the trauma required to remove the specimen with the expectation that this may improve outcomes. Reduction in postoperative analgesic use, quicker return of bowel function, and shorter length of hospital stay have been observed in colorectal operations with NOSE compared to conventional specimen extraction. While the feasibility of NOSE has been demonstrated in colorectal surgery, failures of this technique have also been described. Selection of patients who can successfully undergo NOSE needs further investigation. This review aims to guide surgeons in appropriately selecting patients for NOSE in colorectal surgery. Patient and specimen characteristics are reviewed in order to define patient populations in which NOSE is likely to be successful. Randomized trials comparing NOSE to conventional specimen extraction in colorectal surgery tend to enroll patients with favorable characteristics (body mass index <30, American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≤3, specimen diameter <6.5 cm) and demonstrate improved outcomes. Adopters of NOSE should restrict using this technique to the populations in which feasibility has been defined in the literature. Wider application to other populations, particularly patients with body mass index >30 and those with significant comorbidities, requires further study.

Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction With Single Stapling Colorectal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Anterior Resection: Feasibility, Outcomes, and Technical Considerations

BACKGROUND

Double and triple stapling techniques to close the rectal stump in laparoscopic anterior resection are fraught with technical drawbacks that could possibly be avoided with the use of the single stapling technique. However, little is known of its safety in laparoscopic surgery or outcomes when combined with natural orifice specimen extraction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze the feasibility and the operative and immediate postoperative outcomes of single-stapled anastomosis and natural orifice specimen extraction with conventional techniques. It intends to evaluate technical variations related to colon, mesentery, and pelvic anatomy characteristics.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

A consecutive series of 188 patients underwent elective surgery for benign or malignant lesions between 10 and 40 cm from the anal verge, 5 cm or less in diameter on radiological examination, stage T1 to T3, Nx, M0, with 2 different methods of rectal stump closure (pursestring vs linear-stapled closure) associated with single or double stapling and per anus vs conventional specimen extraction.

SETTING

This study was conducted at China Medical University Hospital, Taiwan, a tertiary referral center, between January 2012 and April 2015.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcomes measured are feasibility and operative and immediate postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Single-stapled resection with natural orifice specimen extraction was feasible in 94% patients with an 11% perioperative morbidity rate. The patients required statistically significantly less analgesia, had earlier return of bowel movements, and shorter hospital stay, whereas there was no statistically significant difference in the overall readmission rate and overall morbidity, including anastomotic leakage.

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-center, retrospective case-matched study.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic variations (short colon and short mesentery) can be managed adequately with intracorporeal anvil head fixation. The single stapling technique is feasible and as safe as conventional double stapling techniques, although it is technically more demanding. The transanal endoscopic operation platform can be useful when the rectal stump is long.

Right lower transverse incision versus vertical transumbilical incision for laparoscopic specimen extraction in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer: a comparative study of two mini-laparotomy techniques

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of a right lower transverse incision with a vertical transumbilical incision for laparoscopic specimen extraction in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer.

Methods

One hundred eighty-three patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for rectosigmoid colon or upper rectal cancer were included. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias caused by differences between the right lower transverse incision (RLT group) and vertical transumbilical incision (VTU group).

Results

After matching, 57 patients in the RLT group and 57 patients in the VTU group were found to be equivalent regarding baseline clinicopathological characteristics. Median follow-up time was 31 months. The RLT group showed comparable results to those of the VTU group in terms of perioperative outcomes, postoperative course, and postoperative complications. However, the proportion of patients requiring an additional incision for diverting stoma was significantly lower in the RLT group (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

A right lower transverse incision appears to be as effective as a vertical transumbilical incision regarding short-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer and may be a preferred extraction site because of its lowered risk of additional mini-laparotomy for diverting stoma.

Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of mid and low rectal cancer: A meta-analysis

AIM

The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and short-term clinical outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) comparing with laparoscopy total mesorectal excision (LapTME) for mid and low rectal cancer.

METHODS

Relevant studies were searched from the databases of Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The qualities of all of the included studies were evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The synthesized outcomes were pooled using fixed-effects models or random-effects models, which weighted the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). A funnel plot was used to evaluate the publication bias.

RESULTS

Seven original studies including 209 TaTME patients and 257 LapTME patients with rectal cancer met the inclusion criteria in this meta-analysis. Compared with LapTME, TaTME showed a longer CRM, lower rate of positive CRM, complete TME rate, and less operative time. There were no significant differences in the outcomes of the harvested lymph nodes, distal margin distance, hospital stay, intraoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, postoperative complications, reoperation, readmission, or conversion between the TaTME group and the LapTME group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with LapTME, TaTME is a feasible and safe approach for patients with mid and low rectal cancer. In addition, TaTME showed a better short-term clinical outcomes, such as a longer CRM, lower risk of positive CRM, higher complete quality of TME rate, and shorter operative duration. Further prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required.

Common postoperative findings unique to laparoscopic surgery

The interpretation of images obtained in patients who have recently undergone abdominal or pelvic surgery is challenging, in part because procedures that were previously performed with open surgical techniques are increasingly being performed with minimally invasive (laparoscopic) techniques. Thus, it is important to be familiar with the normal approach used for laparoscopic surgeries. The authors describe the indications for various laparoscopic surgical procedures (eg, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, hernia repair) as well as normal postoperative findings. For example, port site hernias are more commonly encountered in patients with trocar sites greater than 10 mm and occur at classic entry sites (eg, the periumbilical region). Similarly, preperitoneal air can be encountered postoperatively, often secondary to trocar dislodgement during difficult entry or positioning. In addition, intraperitoneal placement of mesh during commonly performed ventral or incisional hernia repairs typically leads to postoperative seroma formation. Familiarity with normal findings after commonly performed laparoscopic surgical procedures in the abdomen and pelvis allows accurate diagnosis of common complications and avoidance of diagnostic pitfalls.

Laparoscopic gastric resection with natural orifice specimen extraction for postulcer pyloric stenosis

Although natural orifice specimen extraction is now relatively widely performed, there have been no reports on gastric resection with specimen extraction through the transgastric route for peptic ulcer disease. A hybrid technique of the laparoscopic and endoscopic approach is presented in the case of a 58-year old male patient. Preoperative gastric fibroscopy showed postulcer pyloric and antral stenosis. Laparoscopic exploration confirmed gastric enlargement. Laparoscopic two-thirds gastrectomy was performed. The staple line suture of the residual stomach was excised and the specimen was extracted through the esophagus and mouth with a gastroscope. Finally, the residual stomach was closed again using linear endostaplers. Reconstruction was performed according to the Roux-en-Y method. Gastric resection using natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) may be a feasible operative procedure. The NOSE with the combination of standard laparoscopy and specimen extraction through a natural orifice can be considered as a bridge to natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.

Transvaginal specimen extraction versus conventional minilaparotomy after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: mid-term results of a case-matched study

BACKGROUND

Although the vagina is considered a viable route during laparoscopic surgery, a number of concerns have led to a need to demonstrate the safety of a transvaginal approach in colorectal surgery. However, the data for transvaginal access in left-sided colorectal cancer are extremely limited, and no study has compared the clinical outcomes with a conventional laparoscopic procedure.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the clinical outcomes of totally laparoscopic anterior resection with transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE) with those of the conventional laparoscopic approach with minilaparotomy (LAP) for anastomosis construction and specimen retrieval in left-sided colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients underwent TVSE between October 2006 and July 2011 and were matched by age, surgery date, tumor location, and tumor stage with patients who underwent conventional LAP for left-sided colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Operative time was significantly longer in the TVSE group (149.3 ± 39.8 vs. 131.9 ± 41.4 min; p = 0.023). Patients in the TVSE group experienced less pain (pain score 4.9 ± 1.6 vs. 5.8 ± 1.9; p = 0.008), shorter time to passage of flatus (2.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.7 ± 1.2 days; p = 0.026), and higher satisfaction with the cosmetic results (cosmetic score 8.0 ± 1.4 vs. 6.3 ± 1.5; p = 0.001). More endolinear staplers for rectal transection were used in the LAP group (1.2 ± 0.5 vs. 1.1 ± 0.2; p = 0.021). Overall morbidities were similar in both groups; however, three wound infections only occurred in the LAP group. After a median follow-up of 34.4 (range 11-60) months, no transvaginal access-site recurrence occurred. The 3-year disease-free survival was similar between groups (91.5 vs. 90.8%; p = 0.746).

CONCLUSIONS

Transvaginal access after totally laparoscopic anterior resection is safe and feasible for left-sided colorectal cancer in selected patients with better short-term outcomes.

Transvaginal specimen extraction after laparoscopic colectomy

BACKGROUND

Despite the advantages of laparoscopic colon surgery, the need for an incision in the abdominal wall to remove the surgical specimen is a morbidity factor. The objective of this article is to introduce transvaginal specimen extraction after laparoscopic colectomy, in order to avoid an abdominal incision.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2011, 21 selected women with benign and malignant colorectal pathologies underwent laparoscopic colectomy and the extraction of the surgical specimen was done through a transvaginal access route. Of these patients, 12 had symptomatic diverticular disease, four had rectal villous adenomas, two had severe chronic constipation, and three had adenocarcinomas. We describe the surgical technique and the short-term outcomes related to the transvaginal specimen extraction.

RESULTS

The procedure was successful in all cases. There were no immediate complications or mortality. At follow-up, between 2 and 34 months, there were no functional disorders associated with the transvaginal specimen extraction.

CONCLUSION

Specimen removal of laparoscopic colectomies via the transvaginal route avoids the abdominal wall incision and its potential complications. It is feasible, safe, and simple to perform, with no additional costs, and provides excellent cosmetic results.

Inguinal Hernia Orifice for Specimen Extraction After Laparoscopic Resections

Specimen extraction is an unavoidable step in all laparoscopic resections. To this day there is no standardized retrieval incision for each procedure and the choice is made individually, yet based on the surgeon’s experience and preference. Additionally, worldwide prevalence of inguinal hernia is high and many patients with this condition require surgical intervention for a distinct reason. In these particular cases, the hernia orifice can be seeing as an opportunity, allowing specimen retrieval when an open repair is performed immediately after the laparoscopic resection. In the present article, the authors propose this new option. Three patients who underwent this technique are also presented. Discussion is focused on the advantages and critics of the approach.

Laparoscopic low anterior resection and transanal pull-through for low rectal cancer: a Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) technique

Ultralow anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis has been proven to be oncologically sound and the majority of patients will have acceptable functional outcome. Here we describe a technique that combines laparoscopic ultralow total mesorectal excision with an intersphincteric dissection in order to allow the mobilized rectum and descending colon to be extracted via the muscular anal canal and so avoid any further abdominal incision other than laparoscopic port sites. We believe this novel approach to have significant clinical potential in selected patients.

Alternative specimen extraction techniques after laparoscopic emergency colectomy in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Omitting the extraction site incision potentially further decreases the abdominal wall trauma in laparoscopic surgery. The purpose of this study was to report the results of alternative specimen extraction techniques after laparoscopic emergency colectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients with IBD underwent (sub)acute emergency colectomy for refractory disease from October 2009 until December 2010. The specimen was retrieved via the stoma site in three and transrectally in seven patients. Patient data were prospectively collected. In case of later completion proctectomy and pouch procedure, adhesions were systematically scored.

RESULTS

The extraction techniques were all feasible. Median operative time was 219 (interquartile range (IQR), 197-232) min. The pain scores and morphine requirement in patients decreased quickly after surgery. No infectious complications occurred. In five patients, a completion proctectomy was performed at a median time of 7 (IQR, 3.8-9.3) months after colectomy. All patients showed absence of any adhesions in the pelvis. In two patients, limited adhesions of the cut side of the mesentery were present.

CONCLUSIONS

Specimen extraction via the rectum or stoma site is a safe, alternative way to extract the specimen after laparoscopic colectomy. No infectious complications were observed postoperatively and no pelvic adhesions were found during completion proctectomy.

Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy

AIM: To evaluate long-term outcomes in a large series of patients who randomly received laparoscopic or open colorectal resection.

METHODS: From February 2000 to December 2004, six hundred sixty-two patients with colorectal disease were randomly assigned to laparoscopic (LPS, n = 330) or open (n = 332) colorectal resection. All patients were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Long-term follow-up was carried out every 6 mo by office visits. In 526 cancer patients five-year overall and disease-free survival were evaluated. Median oncologic follow-up was 96 mo.

RESULTS: Eight (4.2%) LPS group patients needed conversion to open surgery. Overall long-term morbidity rate was 7.6% (25/330) in the LPS vs 11.1% (37/332) in the open group (P = 0.17). In cancer patients, five-year overall survival was 68.6% in the LPS group and 64.0% in the Open group (P = 0.27). Excluding stage IV patients, five-year local and distant recurrence rates were 32.5% in the LPS group and 36.8% in the Open group (P = 0.36). Further, no difference in recurrence rate was found when patients were stratified according to cancer stage.

CONCLUSION: LPS colorectal resection was associated with a slightly lower incidence of long-term complications than open surgery. No difference between groups was found in overall and disease-free survival rates.

Clinical outcome of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transvaginal resection, anastomosis, and retrieval of specimen

PURPOSE

The goal of this study is to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of totally laparoscopic colectomy with transvaginal anastomosis and extraction of specimen in female patients with right-sided colon cancer.

METHODS

A review of prospectively collected database at the Kyungpook National University Hospital from April 2007 to December 2007 revealed a series of 14 consecutive patients affected by right colon cancer were operated by use of the totally laparoscopic colectomy with transvaginal anastomosis and extraction of specimen approach. For this approach, the bowel was fully mobilized and a D3 lymphadenectomy was performed with established laparoscopic technique, followed by transvaginal anastomosis and removal of the resected specimen. Data regarding clinicopathological outcomes, surgical morbidity, and short-term oncologic results were analyzed.

RESULTS

No case required an open conversion, but in 2 patients the planned transvaginal retrieval of the specimen was aborted because of inadequate posterior colpotomy. The median operative time was 150.0 minutes (range, 110-330 min) and the median blood loss was 50.0 mL (range, 20.0-115 mL). The median tumor size was 4.0 cm and the number of harvested lymph nodes was 36.0 (range, 13-65). There was no surgical mortality or major morbidity, except one case of postoperative ileus that was conservatively managed. No patient experienced complications directly associated the transvaginal approach; nor did any patient have infection or prolonged spotting from the extraction site postoperatively. Recovery after the procedure was rapid and the median hospital stay was 7.0 days (range, 6-12 d). With a median follow-up 34 months, one patient experienced distant metastasis (7.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

In selected cases, totally laparoscopic colectomy with transvaginal anastomosis and extraction of specimen is feasible and reproducible and may be an alternative technique for treatment of women with right colon cancer. This approach may provide both an attractive way to increase patient comfort and a bridge to "pure" natural orifice colon surgery.

Transvaginal colonic extraction following combined hysterectomy and laparoscopic total colectomy: a natural orifice approach

A major advantage of laparoscopic colectomy is the limited incision. We describe an innovative technique in which the entire colon is extracted transvaginally to avoid any abdominal extraction incision in a female patient with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer who required total colectomy and hysterectomy. This novel technical approach is feasible and safe, eliminates the need for any extraction abdominal incision, and may be considered in patients requiring concurrent abdominal colectomy and hysterectomy.

An innovative technique for colorectal specimen retrieval: a new era of "natural orifice specimen extraction" (N.O.S.E)

PURPOSE

The common incisions for transabdominal specimen retrieval after laparoscopic colorectal surgery are lower quadrant, midline, or transverse suprapubic incision. This study was designed to evaluate a novel method of specimen extraction after totally laparoscopic proctocolectomies.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied seven women patients from 2004 to 2007. The indication for surgery was familial polyposis coexisting with adenocarcinoma of the upper rectum. A totally laparoscopic proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was successfully performed for all cases. The entire specimen was extracted via a transvaginal route.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 49.5 years, and mean body mass index was 25.3 kg/m(2). The mean operating time was 222.5 minutes, and average blood loss was 172 ml. The average hospital stay was 25.5 days. Postoperative complications included ileus (n = 1), pouchitis (n = 1), and deep vein thrombosis (n = 1). The vaginal wound had healed completely by the first follow-up. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our technique of transvaginal retrieval effectively prevents wound-related complications by completely eliminating minilaparotomies for specimen retrieval. It could be called "Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction," or N.O.S.E. We stress the need for innovations in specimen extraction, for which importance is not given by surgeons.

A new laparoscopic-transvaginal technique for rectosigmoid resection in patients with endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience with a new technique for laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection in patients with endometriosis.

DESIGN

Prospective collaborative cohort study.

SETTING

Gynecologic departments of two university hospitals.

PATIENT(S)

Thirty-three women with rectosigmoid endometriotic lesions requiring segmental bowel resection.

INTERVENTION(S)

Laparoscopic intracorporeal division of the distal bowel and exteriorization of the affected segment via a colpotomy incision to complete the resection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Intraoperative and postoperative complications, and relief from symptoms.

RESULT(S)

The only intraoperative complication was bleeding from the inferior mesenteric artery that required conversion to laparotomy to obtain hemostasis. No patient required a temporary colostomy. No anastomotic complications were identified. Postoperative complications included a symptomatic pelvic seroma that required operative drainage in 1 patient and urinary retention that required intermittent self-catheterization in 3 women. The median follow-up duration was 13 months (range, 3-27 mo). Twenty-seven women were symptom free at the time of last follow-up evaluation. No patient had recurrent cyclic rectal bleeding, rectal pain on defecation, or tenesmus. Postoperatively, 4 of 13 patients who tried to conceive were successful.

CONCLUSION(S)

Segmental colorectal resection with a combined laparoscopic-transvaginal approach, avoiding the extension of port-site incisions, represents a viable option for the treatment of bowel endometriosis.

Totally intracorporeal laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis using circular stapler

BACKGROUND

A number of surgical techniques for colorectal anastomosis have been described for laparoscopic left-sided colectomies. Due to the complexity of these procedures, open preparation of the proximal bowel for circular stapler anastomosis through a Pfannenstiel incision has become the gold standard. We report a new laparoscopic technique for totally intracorporeal colorectal circular anastomosis (TLCCA) using a circular stapler.

METHODS

Preliminary experience using TLCCA in three patients scheduled for laparoscopic left colectomies (two) and sigmoidectomy (one).

RESULTS

Side-to-end colorectal anastomosis through TLCCA was feasible in all patients scheduled for preliminary experience. Median time from anvil insertion into abdominal cavity to anastomosis was 14 (11-17) minutes. No postoperative complications were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Side-to-end anastomosis can be easily and safely performed using conventional circular stapler through TLCCA. TLCCA is performed using four laparoscopic ports without additional skin incision (except trocars incision) and allows the retrieval of surgical pieces through a specimen bag.

Laparoendoscopically assisted endoscopic small bowel polypectomy in a patient with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is a rare condition, requiring regular endoscopic or radiological diagnostic studies. Polyps are a potential source of dysplasia and malignancy. We present a case in which we used a new diagnostic and therapeutic approach to this pathology by performing a laparoscopically assisted endoscopic polypectomy. This approach is minimally invasive and can be repeated if necessary. It might also be adopted for diagnosis and treatment of other intestinal pathologies, such as vascular malformations in the small bowel.

Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in Germany—a standardised procedure?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic resection of the sigmoid colon is generally considered as feasible option to open surgery, but standardised guidelines on surgical details have not been adopted yet. The aim of this survey was to investigate which techniques were applied by laparoscopic surgeons who are members of the Surgical Working Group for Minimal Invasive Surgery (CAMIC) of the German Surgical Society.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2005, we conducted a written survey among all members of the CAMIC asking them for their routine surgical strategy of laparoscopic sigmoid resection in a standardised multiple-choice questionnaire. This questionnaire consisted of 20 questions covering main technical issues of laparoscopic sigmoid resection including trocar and team positioning, mobilisation and resection of the left colon, specimen retrieval as well as anastomosing technique. The results were classified into four levels of consensus depending on the level of agreement between participating surgeons.

RESULTS

There were 292 surgeons who took part in the survey. Strong consensus (>95% agreement) was only found in 1 of 20 technical details: the operating surgeon standing at the patient right's side. Consensus (75-95% agreement) was found for: position of the first assistant standing to the patient's left side, size of the camera port is 10 mm, lateral mobilisation of the left hemicolon before ligating the inferior mesenteric artery, extracorporeal resection of the sigmoid via minilaparotomy, transrectal stapling of the colorectal anastomosis, intraoperative testing of the anastomosis for leakage, no regular suturing over the anastomosis and irrigating of the abdominal cavity after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Variability of technical details of laparoscopic sigmoidectomy was surprisingly high among German laparoscopic surgeons. This fact should be considered when discussing clinical studies about laparoscopic sigmoidectomy because trocar position, type of minilaparotomy and dissection techniques may very well influence patient outcome after laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, publications of clinical results concerning laparoscopic sigmoid resection should include a precise description of the technical details of the operation.

Laparoscopic versus conventional open resection of rectal carcinoma: A clinical comparative study

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic resection of rectal carcinoma and to compare the short-term outcome of laparoscopic procedure with conventional open surgery for rectal cancer.

METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with rectal cancer were included in a prospective non-randomized study. The patients were assigned to laparoscopic (n = 18) or open (n = 18) colorectal resection. Case selection, surgical technique, and clinical and pathological results were reviewed.

RESULTS: The operative time was longer in laparoscopic resection group (LAP) than in open resection group (189 ± 18 min vs 146 ± 22 min, P < 0.05). Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were less in LAP resection group than in open resection group. An earlier return of bowel motility was observed after laparoscopic surgery. The overall postoperative morbidity was 5.6% in the LAP resection group and 27.8% in open resection group (P < 0.05). No anastomotic leakage was found in both groups. The pathologic examination showed that the length of the resected specimen, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes in laparoscopic resection group were comparable to those in open resection group.

CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer is a feasible but technically demanding procedure. The present study demonstrates the safety of the procedure, while oncologic results are comparable to the open surgery, with a favorable short-term outcome.