Current Status of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibition Strategies in the Treatment of Vasculitis

Functions of TNF and its receptors in renal disease: distinct roles in inflammatory tissue injury and immune regulation

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha is a potent proinflammatory cytokine and important mediator of inflammatory tissue damage. In addition, it has important immune-regulatory functions. Many experimental studies and clinical observations support a role for TNF in the pathogenesis of acute and chronic renal disease. However, given its dual functions in inflammation and immune regulation, TNF may mediate both proinflammatory as well as immunosuppressive effects, particularly in chronic kidney diseases and systemic autoimmunity. Blockade of TNF in human rheumatoid arthritis or Crohn's disease led to the development of autoantibodies, lupus-like syndrome, and glomerulonephritis in some patients. These data raise concern about using TNF-blocking therapies in renal disease because the kidney may be especially vulnerable to the manifestation of autoimmune processes. Interestingly, recent experimental evidence suggests distinct roles for the 2 TNF receptors in mediating local inflammatory injury in the kidney and systemic immune-regulatory functions. In this review the biologic properties of TNF and its receptors, TNF receptors 1 and 2, relevant to kidney disease are summarized followed by a review of the available experimental and clinical data on the pathogenic role of the TNF system in nonimmune and immune renal diseases. Experimental evidence also is reviewed that supports a rationale for specifically blocking TNF receptor 2 versus anti-TNF therapies in some nephropathies, including immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis.

Vasculitis treatment - new therapeutic approaches

In childhood, vasculitis carries with it a not inconsequential morbidity and mortality. Current therapy is usually effective in inducing remission, but there is a penalty in terms of significant and serious side effects as well as concerns about long-term maintenance regimens. Additionally, some patients are recalcitrant to treatment and options have, hitherto, been limited in relation to alternative therapy. In view of this, novel therapeutic approaches are being explored that include the better use of long-established agents as well as the utilization of newer immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory strategies. Blockade of circulating mediators and surface receptors as well as lymphocyte depletion and immunoablation are being introduced predominantly in adults but increasingly also in children. With greater understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in the disease processes it is becoming possible to utilize much more focussed therapy for these serious and life-threatening disorders with, hopefully, a decrease in long-term morbidity and mortality as well as a diminution of drug-induced adverse effects.

Translating basic science into patient therapy for ANCA-associated small vessel vasculitis

ANCA (anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody)-associated small vessel vasculitis is an inflammatory condition associated with the production of autoantibodies to neutrophil cytoplasmic components. The disorder results in destruction of the microvasculature, infiltration of neutrophils into tissues, which is followed later by mononuclear cells, leading to injury and the formation of granulomatous lesions. Initiators for the disease are undetermined but a pro-inflammatory environment is required. Other influencing factors may include environmental triggers, genetic propensity or infectious agents. The primary cellular event in the condition involves the neutrophils, which are likely to be responsible for the majority of tissue injury. Binding of the autoantibody to neutrophils initiates cell activation via a complex intracellular signalling cascade, culminating in the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, proteolytic enzymes and reactive oxygen species. Adhesion of neutrophils to endothelial cells is observed in vitro and more investigations in this area may explain the focussing of the disease to certain vessels/tissues. Current treatment regimens have substantial toxicity. Although newer developments are an improvement there is still a pressing need for more targeted therapies, which could be provided by extrapolating information emerging from basic scientific research.

Cyclophosphamide treatment in systemic necrotizing vasculitis and lupus nephritis. How long? How much?

The gold standard for inducing remission in systemic necrotizing vasculitis (SNV) and severe lupus nephritis is (and remains) the combination of cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids. Long-term treatment with cyclophosphamide is limited because of toxicity. Recent prospective studies in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated SNV revealed that after achievement of clinical remission (usually within 3-4 months after starting cyclophosphamide) cyclophosphamide can be replaced by azathioprine with no increase in relapse rates if treatment is continued for at least 1 year. Methotrexate is inferior to cyclophosphamide because of increased relapse rates-particularly in those with renal involvement-during follow-up. An ongoing study comparing mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with azathioprine will clarify whether MMF is as successful as azathioprine or even better. The concomitant use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha blockers increases the efficacy of immunosuppression. TNF-alpha blockers may be added if SNV is refractory to standard immunosuppressive therapy. However, with this addition to therapy, systemic infections are more frequent. In patients with severe lupus nephritis (WHO IV) the efficacy of combined i.v. therapy with cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids was shown by NIH trials. This NIH regimen competes with the EURO-Lupus nephritis schedule with a lower dose of i.v. cyclophosphamide followed by maintenance therapy with azathioprine. Long-term follow-up is, however, still lacking in the EURO-Lupus trial. Ongoing prospective studies will reveal whether cyclophosphamide may be substituted by MMF from the very beginning or whether MMF is superior to azathioprine during maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis.