Ablative therapies for liver metastases of gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors

Conventional Transarterial Chemo embolization Using Streptozocin in Patients with Unresectable Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical, biological and radiological responses to, and tolerability of, conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) using streptozocin for unresectable neuroendocrine liver metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 52 patients with predominant liver disease were treated with cTACE using an emulsion of streptozocin, Lipiodol and embolization particles. A sequential approach was favored in patients with high liver tumor burden. Clinical, biological and radiological responses were evaluated using carcinoid symptoms, biomarkers and mRecist criteria, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 127 procedures were performed with a sequential approach in 65% of patients. All patients received streptozocin and Lipiodol. Carcinoid syndrome was improved in 69% of patients after treatment (p = 0.01). Post-embolization syndrome was reported in 78% of patients. At the end of all cTACE, objective response and non-progressive disease were 32% and 70%, respectively. Progression-free survival was 18.3 ± 13.3 months (median 14.9) and median overall survival (OS) from start of treatment was 74 months. The OS at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 5 years was 91% (IC = 84-99%), 84% (CI = 72-95%), 69% (CI = 53-84%) and 63% (C = 46-81%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

cTACE using streptozocin is an effective and well-tolerated palliative option for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases, associated with prolonged survival and delayed time to progression.

Long-term survival and toxicity in patients with neuroendocrine tumors treated with 177 Lu-octreotate peptide radionuclide therapy

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has shown favorable results in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Long-term safety and efficacy data for ¹⁷⁷ Lu-octreotate PRRT, particularly in combination with chemotherapy, is lacking.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of the long-term toxicity and survival outcomes of 104 patients with advanced NETs treated on 4 phase 2 clinical trials with Lutetium-177-octreotate (¹⁷⁷ Lu-octreotate) PRRT, mostly in combination with chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 68 months, which represents the longest follow-up study of ¹⁷⁷ Lu-octreotate PRRT for NETs to date.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 37 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 71 months. Five- and 10-year OS were 62% and 29%, and 5- and 10-year PFS were 36% and 21%, respectively, demonstrating ¹⁷⁷ Lu-octreotate can provide durable responses. PRRT was well tolerated with 1.9% of patients developing chronic renal impairment and 1% of patients developing long-term thrombocytopenia. Interestingly, there was a relatively high rate of myelodysplasia (MDS)/leukemia (6.7%), possibly attributable to the longer follow-up (with all except 1 case occurring more than 4 years after PRRT treatment) or to the addition of concurrent chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Lutetium-177-Octreotate PRRT remains an efficacious and well tolerated treatment in long-term follow-up. For clinicians deciding on the timing of PRRT for individual patients, the 6.7% long-term risk of MDS/leukemia needs to be balanced against the 21% PFS at 10 years.

Biological and Biochemical Basis of the Differential Efficacy of First and Second Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Endogenous somatostatin shows anti-secretory effects in both physiological and pathological settings, as well as inhibitory activity on cell growth. Since somatostatin is not suitable for clinical practice, researchers developed synthetic somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) to overcome this limitation. Currently, SRLs represent pivotal tools in the treatment algorithm of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Octreotide and lanreotide are the first-generation SRLs developed and show a preferential binding affinity to somatostatin receptor (SST) subtype 2, while pasireotide, which is a second-generation SRL, has high affinity for multiple SSTs (SST₅ > SST₂ > SST₃ > SST₁). A number of studies demonstrated that first-generation and second-generation SRLs show distinct functional properties, besides the mere receptor affinity. Therefore, the aim of the present review is to critically review the current evidence on the biological effects of SRLs in pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors, by mainly focusing on the differences between first-generation and second-generation ligands.

Therapy for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are frequently malignant (50-80%, except for insulinoma) and may show an aggressive course with metastases to the liver as well as more distant sites. These heterogeneous neoplasms include functioning tumors, which secrete a variety of peptide hormones, and non-functioning tumors (up to 90% of pNETs), which often show metastases at the time of diagnosis.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed for English-language publications from 1995 through December 2012. Reference lists from studies selected were manually searched to identify further relevant reports. Manuscripts comparing different therapeutic options and advances for metastatic pNETs were selected.

RESULTS

The therapeutic options for metastatic pNETs are expanding and include surgery, which remains the only curative approach, liver-directed therapies, and medical therapy. In selected cases also liver transplantation (OLT) may be considered. The option of OLT for metastatic disease is unique to neuroendocrine tumors. Recently, novel promising targeted therapies have been proposed for progressive well-differentiated pNETs.

CONCLUSIONS

The best therapeutic approach for pNETs is still matter of debating. However, since pNETs often show a more indolent behavior compared to other malignancies, the preservation of the quality of life of the patient and the personalization of the therapy according to tumor's and patient's features are mandatory.

[The relevance of PET/CT for the surgical management of neuroendocrine neoplasms]

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare malignancies with a wide spectrum of metastatic potential which originate from the endocrine cells of the body and express somatostatin receptors. The (68)gallium somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) technique is the most sensitive method of assessment of well-differentiated NENs and for the detection of cancer of unknown primary (CUP syndrome) NENs. Imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG PET/CT) is indicated in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. The receptor-dependent imaging of NENs has a decisive impact on further management.

Systemic treatment in unresectable metastatic well-differentiated carcinoid tumors: consensus results from a modified delphi process

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop expert consensus for the use of systemic treatments for unresectable metastatic well-differentiated (grade 1-2) carcinoid tumors using the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi process.

METHODS

After a comprehensive literature review, 404 patient scenarios addressing the use of systemic treatments for carcinoid tumors were constructed. A multidisciplinary panel of 10 physicians assessed the scenarios as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain (on a 1-9 scale) or as an area of disagreement before and after an extended discussion of the evidence.

RESULTS

Experts were medical and surgical oncologists, interventional radiologists, and gastroenterologists. Among rated scenarios, disagreement decreased from 14% before the meeting to 4% after. Consensus statements about midgut carcinoids included the following: (1) Somatostatin analogs are appropriate as first-line therapy for all patients; (2) In patients with uncontrolled secretory symptoms, it is appropriate to increase the dose/frequency of octreotide long-acting repeatable up to 60 mg every 4 weeks or up to 40 mg every 3 weeks as second-line therapy for refractory carcinoid syndrome. Other options may also be appropriate. Consensus was similar for non-midgut carcinoids.

CONCLUSIONS

The Delphi process provided a structured methodological approach to assist clinician experts in reaching consensus on the appropriateness of specific medical therapies for the treatment of advanced carcinoid tumors.

Treatment of multiple endocrine neoplasia 1/2 tumors: case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors are uncommon tumors that are histopathologically and biologically heterogeneous and include the multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) 1 and 2 syndromes. The morbidity of MEN-1 and MEN-2 is often due to the symptomatology of the endocrine hormones produced, and the mortality mainly occurs from hepatic dysfunction incurred by liver metastases. At present, there is essentially no effective cure once the tumor has metastasized to the liver.

PATIENT

We present a patient with progressive, metastatic MEN-1 with the classic '3 P's' triad of neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas, parathyroid adenoma and a pituitary adenoma.

RESULTS

After progression on high-dose Sandostatin LAR (60 mg/month) and multiple surgeries, the patient had a partial response (40% decrease) to a novel regimen of capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) and progression-free survival of 18 months. He had minor grade 1 toxicities and no grade 2, 3 or 4 toxicities.

DISCUSSION

The history and treatment options for MEN-1/2 cancers are reviewed, as well as the data behind our novel regimen, CAPTEM.

CONCLUSION

The CAPTEM regimen is a tolerable, safe, easy to administer oral regimen with possible efficacy for MEN-1 tumors.

Treatment of liver metastases in patients with digestive neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases are a strong prognostic indicator in patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Therapeutic options for metastatic NETs are expanding and not mutually exclusive.

AIMS

This paper reviews the literature relating to multidisciplinary approach towards GEP-NET metastases, to highlight advances in knowledge regarding these tumors, and to understand the interdisciplinary management of individual patients.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed for English-language publications from 1995 through 2012. Reference lists from studies selected were manually searched to identify further relevant reports. Manuscripts comparing different therapeutic options and advances for GEP-NET-related liver metastases were selected.

RESULTS

There is considerable controversy regarding the optimal management of GEP-NET metastases. Although radical surgery still remains the gold standard, a variety of other therapeutic options are available for metastatic GEP-NETs, including loco-regional chemotherapy/radiotherapy, radioembolization, systemic peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, biotherapy, and chemotherapy. In selected patients, liver transplantation should also be considered. Systemic somatostatin analogues and/or interferon show anti-proliferative effects, representing an appropriate first-line treatment for most patients. In advanced metastatic NETs, recent options include targeted therapies (i.e., everolimus and sunitinib).

CONCLUSIONS

It is evident that multidisciplinary care and multimodality treatments remain the cornerstone of management of NET patients. Since NETs often show a more indolent behavior compared to other malignancies, physicians should aim to preserve a satisfactory quality of life for the patient by personalizing the therapeutic approach according to the tumor's features and prognostic factors.

A phase II clinical trial of sunitinib following hepatic transarterial embolization for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

The liver is the predominant site of metastases among patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Prior retrospective studies have reported high response rates in patients treated with transarterial embolization (TAE). NETs are highly vascular and are known to express vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). We hypothesized that administration of sunitinib, a VEGFR inhibitor, following TAE would extend progression-free survival (PFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic NETs to the liver underwent a series of selective TAEs followed by sunitinib (until disease progression or maximum of 12 months). Radiographic response (by RECIST), survival, and safety parameters were monitored.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were enrolled. The overall response rate was 72% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-0.86]. Median PFS was 15.2 months. Rates of overall survival (OS) at 1 and 4 years were 95% (95% CI, 0.88-1.00) and 59% (95% CI, 0.38-0.80), respectively. A significant 34% rise in serum VEGF was observed following the initial TAE (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic TAE is a highly active treatment option for patients with metastatic NETs to the liver. Embolization stimulates release of VEGF into the circulation. Sunitinib, an oral VEGFR inhibitor, can be safely administered following embolization. The high rates of PFS and OS associated with this sequence of therapies are encouraging.

Targeting aurora kinases with danusertib (PHA-739358) inhibits growth of liver metastases from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in an orthotopic xenograft model

PURPOSE

Aurora kinases play a crucial role in cell-cycle control. Uncontrolled expression of aurora kinases causes aneuploidy and tumor growth. As conservative treatment options for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) are disappointing, aurora kinases may be an interesting target for novel therapeutic strategies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Human GEP-NETs were tested for aurora kinase expression. The efficacy of the new aurora kinase inhibitor danusertib was evaluated in two human GEP-NET cell lines (BON1 and QGP) in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

The majority of ten insulinomas and all 33 nonfunctional pancreatic or midgut GEP-NETs expressed aurora A despite a mostly high degree of cell differentiation. Both human GEP-NET cell lines expressed aurora kinase A and B, and high Ser10 phosphorylation of histone H3 revealed increased aurora B activity. Remarkably, danusertib led to cell-cycle arrest and completely inhibited cell proliferation of the GEP-NET cells in vitro. Decreased phosphorylation of histone H3 indicated effective aurora B inhibition. In a subcutaneous murine xenograft model, danusertib significantly reduced tumor growth in vivo compared with controls or mice treated with streptozotocine/5-fluorouracil. As a consequence, decreased levels of tumor marker chromogranin A were found in mouse serum samples. In a newly developed orthotopic model for GEP-NET liver metastases by intrasplenic tumor cell transplantation, dynamic MRI proved significant growth inhibition of BON1- and QGP-derived liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that danusertib may impose a new therapeutic strategy for aurora kinase expressing metastasized GEP-NETs.

Perfusion characterization of liver metastases from endocrine tumors: Computed tomography perfusion

AIM: To assess prospectively parameters of computed tomography perfusion (CT p) for evaluation of vascularity of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS: This study was approved by the hospital’s institutional review board. All 18 patients provided informed consent. There were 30 liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. Patients were divided into three groups depending on the appearance of the liver metastases at the arterial phase of morphological CT (hyperdense, hypodense and necrotic). Sequential acquisition of the liver was performed before and for 2 min after intravenous injection of 0.5 mg/kg contrast medium, at 4 mL/s. Data were analyzed using deconvolution analysis to calculate blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), mean transit time (MTT), hepatic arterial perfusion index (HAPI) and a bi-compartmental analysis was performed to obtain vascular permeability-surface area product (PS). Post-treatment analysis was performed by a radiologist and regions of interest were plotted on the metastases, normal liver, aorta and portal vein.

RESULTS: At the arterial phase of the morphological CT scan, the aspects of liver metastases were hyperdense (n = 21), hypodense (n = 7), and necrotic (n = 2). In cases of necrotic metastases, none of the CT p parameters were changed. Compared to normal liver, a significant difference in all CT p parameters was found in cases of hyperdense metastases, and only for HAPI and MTT in cases of hypodense metastases. No significant difference was found for MTT and HAPI between hypo- and hyperdense metastases. A significant decrease of PS, BV and BF was demonstrated in cases of patients with hypodense lesions PS (23 ± 11.6 mL/100 g per minute) compared to patients with hyperdense lesions; PS (13.5 ± 10.4 mL/100 g per minute), BF (93.7 ± 75.4 vs 196.0 ± 115.6 mL/100 g per minute) and BV (9.7 ± 5.9 vs 24.5 ± 10.9 mL/100 g).

CONCLUSION: CT p provides additional information compared to the morphological appearance of liver metastases.

Treatment response to transcatheter arterial embolization and chemoembolization in primary and metastatic tumors of the liver

INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) and chemoembolization (TACE) are increasingly used to treat unresectable primary and metastatic liver tumors. The purpose of this study was to determine the objective response to TAE and TACE in unresectable hepatic malignancies and to identify clinicopathologic predictors of response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-nine consecutive patients who underwent 119 TAE/TACE procedures between 1998 and 2006 were reviewed. The change in maximal diameter of 121 evaluable lesions in 56 patients was calculated from pre and post-procedure imaging. Response rates were determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival in responders vs. non-responders and in primary vs. metastatic histologies.

RESULTS

TAE and TACE resulted in a mean decrease in lesion size of 10.3%+/-1.9% (p<0.001). TACE (vs. TAE) and carcinoid tumors were associated with a greater response (p<0.05). Lesion response was not predicted by pre-treatment size, vascularity, or histology. The RECIST partial response (PR) rate was 12.3% and all partial responders were in the TACE group. Neuroendocrine tumors, and specifically carcinoid lesions, had a significantly greater PR rate (p<0.05). Overall survival, however, was not associated with histology or radiologic response.

DISCUSSION

TAE and TACE produce a significant objective treatment response by RECIST criteria. Response is greatest in neuroendocrine tumors and is independent of vascularity and lesion size. TACE appears to be superior to TAE. Although an association of response with improved survival was not demonstrated, large cohort studies are necessary to further define this relationship.

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: pancreatic endocrine tumors

Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) have long fascinated clinicians and investigators despite their relative rarity. Their clinical presentation varies depending on whether the tumor is functional or not, and also according to the specific hormonal syndrome produced. Tumors may be sporadic or inherited, but little is known about their molecular pathology, especially the sporadic forms. Chromogranin A appears to be the most useful serum marker for diagnosis, staging, and monitoring. Initially, therapy should be directed at the hormonal syndrome because this has the major initial impact on the patient's health. Most PETs are relatively indolent but ultimately malignant, except for insulinomas, which predominantly are benign. Surgery is the only modality that offers the possibility of cure, although it generally is noncurative in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or nonfunctional PETs with multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Preoperative staging of disease extent is necessary to determine the likelihood of complete resection although debulking surgery often is believed to be useful in patients with unresectable tumors. Once metastatic, biotherapy is usually the first modality used because it generally is well tolerated. Systemic or regional therapies generally are reserved until symptoms occur or tumor growth is rapid. Recently, a number of newer agents, as well as receptor-directed radiotherapy, are being evaluated for patients with advanced disease. This review addresses a number of recent advances regarding the molecular pathology, diagnosis, localization, and management of PETs including discussion of peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy and other novel antitumor approaches. We conclude with a discussion of future directions and unsettled problems in the field.

Treatment with the radiolabeled somatostatin analog [177 Lu-DOTA 0,Tyr3]octreotate: toxicity, efficacy, and survival

PURPOSE

Despite the fact that most gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) are slow-growing, median overall survival (OS) in patients with liver metastases is 2 to 4 years. In metastatic disease, cytoreductive therapeutic options are limited. A relatively new therapy is peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with the radiolabeled somatostatin analog [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate. Here we report on the toxicity and efficacy of this treatment, performed in over 500 patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were treated up to a cumulative dose of 750 to 800 mCi (27.8-29.6 GBq), usually in four treatment cycles, with treatment intervals of 6 to 10 weeks. Toxicity analysis was done in 504 patients, and efficacy analysis in 310 patients.

RESULTS

Any hematologic toxicity grade 3 or 4 occurred after 3.6% of administrations. Serious adverse events that were likely attributable to the treatment were myelodysplastic syndrome in three patients, and temporary, nonfatal, liver toxicity in two patients. Complete and partial tumor remissions occurred in 2% and 28% of 310 GEPNET patients, respectively. Minor tumor response (decrease in size > 25% and < 50%) occurred in 16%. Median time to progression was 40 months. Median OS from start of treatment was 46 months, median OS from diagnosis was 128 months. Compared with historical controls, there was a survival benefit of 40 to 72 months from diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate has few adverse effects. Tumor response rates and progression-free survival compare favorably to the limited number of alternative treatment modalities. Compared with historical controls, there is a benefit in OS from time of diagnosis of several years.

Role of radiolabeled octreotide therapy in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a new therapeutic modality for patients with nonresectable neuroendocrine tumors. The technique is based on the unique ability of these tumors to express cell membrane-specific peptide receptors that can be targeted with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues. A high level of uptake on somatostatin receptor scintigraphy is a prerequisite for effective treatment. The efficacy of this method has been proven in several clinical trials. In a substantial number of patients, an improvement of life quality has been achieved in addition to a marked morphologic and biochemical tumor response. Serious side effects are rarely observed. Attention must be paid to kidney protection during the treatment. The present review summarizes the clinical experience with the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues and focuses on patient selection and the appropriate timing of the therapy. Finally, it emphasizes treatment-related issues that deserve attention in the future.

Anatomic and functional imaging of metastatic carcinoid tumors

Carcinoid tumors are a fascinating group of neuroendocrine neoplasms that develop either sporadically or as part of an inheritable syndrome. Many tumors arise in the bronchopulmonary or gastrointestinal tract, but a neuroendocrine tumor can arise in almost any organ. The tumors have varied malignant potential depending on the site of their origin, and the clinical manifestations often are nonspecific. Metastases may be present at the time of diagnosis, which often occurs at a late stage of the disease. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the localization and staging of neuroendocrine tumors and in monitoring the treatment response. Imaging is often challenging, and a combination of anatomic and functional techniques is usually required, depending on the tumor type and location. Techniques include ultrasonography, barium studies, endoscopy, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, iobenguane scintigraphy, and, in select cases, positron emission tomography. Coregistration of structural and functional images is often of incremental value for accurate localization of the primary tumor and any meta-static disease. Radiologists must understand the contribution of each imaging modality in the assessment of different neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, knowledge of the optimal technique for each radiologic and radionuclide imaging examination is essential. Familiarity with the protean imaging appearances of both primary and metastatic disease is essential for accurate staging, treatment monitoring, and surveillance. Finally, an understanding of the wide variety of treatment options for patients with carcinoid tumors is vital for optimal management.

Cytotoxic treatment including embolization/chemoembolization for neuroendocrine tumours

In patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumours, surgery is curative in only a minority of cases, whilst the anti-tumour effect of somatostatin analogues, despite efficient symptom control, is limited. Systemic chemotherapy has been proved to be effective only in certain tumour types. Although metastatic midgut carcinoids and well-differentiated gastrointestinal carcinoids are relatively insensitive to chemotherapy, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours show a response rate of around 40% to streptozotocin-based combinations, particularly with fluorouracil and doxorubicin. Poorly differentiated tumours respond even better, especially to a combination of cisplatin and etoposide. In patients with predominant liver disease, ischaemia of tumour lesions induced by vascular occlusion by particle embolization or chemoembolization may be considered. This may have clinical and biochemical responses up to 80%, and objective responses up to 60%, in disease which is progressive despite previous treatments. Potential adverse effects and short duration of response should be taken into account.

Arterial phase enhancement and body mass index are predictors of response to chemoembolisation for liver metastases of endocrine tumours

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) has been reported to be an efficient treatment of liver metastases of endocrine tumours in short series of patients. However, several factors seem to affect its results. The aim of this work is to identify predictors of response to TACE for liver metastases of endocrine tumours. A total of 163 TACE procedures were performed in 67 patients between 1994 and 2004. Forty-four patients were treated with streptozotocin and 23 with doxorubicin. Primary tumour was located in the pancreas for 19 patients, and had been removed in 43. Thirty-eight tumours were functioning. Response rate was 37% (confidence interval [CI] 95%: 28–49%). Median time to progression (TTP) was 14.5 months (CI 95%: 9–41). In multivariate analysis (n=43), predictors of tumour response were body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.3; CI 95%: 1.04–1.63; P=0.022), functioning type of tumour (OR: 7.31; CI 95%: 1.26–42.5; P=0.027), arterial phase enhancement on abdominal computed tomography (CT) (OR: 8.11; CI 95%:1.06–62; P=0.044) and use of streptozotocin for cytotoxic agent (OR: 21.3; CI 95%: 1.48–306; P=0.025). Analysis of TTP predictors showed that BMI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.85; CI 95%: 0.76–0.86; P=0.01) and arterial phase enhancement (HR: 0.3; CI 95%: 0.12–0.73; P=0.008) were associated with delayed progression. This large study confirms the previously reported results of TACE regarding its efficacy for the treatment of liver metastases of endocrine tumours. Arterial phase enhancement on abdominal CT and BMI are predictors of treatment's efficacy. Streptozotocin should be the preferred cytotoxic agent in order to save anthracycline for systemic chemotherapy.

Colorectal liver metastases: regional chemotherapy via transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic chemoperfusion: an update

Liver metastasis is one of the main problems encountered in colorectal cancer management as the liver is the most common metastatic site. Several treatment options are available, among which transarterial chemotherapy has proved effective in achieving some local tumour control, improving the quality of life through symptomatic control as well as survival time. The present paper is intended to provide an overview of the techniques, indications and results of regional chemotherapy, which comprises transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and chemoperfusion. This treatment approach has symptomatic, palliative, adjuvant and potentially curative objectives. We reviewed the studies involving TACE and chemoperfusion of colorectal liver metastases during the last few years to update the previous reviews published on this subject. The results achieved were so variable, due to the variations in patient selection criteria and regimens used between the different studies. The median survival ranged from 9 to 62 months and the morphological response ranged from 14 to 76%. Technical aspects, results, and complications of this modality will be demonstrated with a detailed analysis and comments.

Selective hepatic artery embolization for treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoid and pancreatic endocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Prognosis in patients with carcinoid and pancreatic endocrine tumors with diffuse, unresectable liver metastases is poor. Palliation is often difficult despite the use of somatostatin analogs, interferon alpha, or systemic chemotherapy. Several reviews have suggested that hepatic artery embolization, with or without intraarterial chemotherapy, can be used for control of symptoms and for cytoreduction in patients with liver dominant metastases.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2002, 161 embolizations using polyvinyl alcohol or microspheres were performed on 84 patients with carcinoid or pancreatic endocrine tumors metastatic to the liver. A retrospective review was performed to evaluate symptomatic response, biochemical response, adverse effects, and duration of survival. Baseline and follow-up computed tomography scans were also assessed to determine radiographic response rates. Further analysis of survival was performed to assess the possible impact of various postembolization therapies.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients underwent bland hepatic artery embolizations during the study period. Among 55 symptomatic patients, 44 patients had fewer symptoms, and among 35 patients whose tumor markers were followed, 28 had a major biochemical response. Objective radiographic responses were observed in 11 of 23 patients. No deaths occurred during therapy, and major toxicities were rare. Median overall survival was 36 months from time of initial embolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic artery embolization frequently results in clinical and radiographic responses in patients with unresectable liver metastases from carcinoid or pancreatic endocrine tumors. Morbidity is low when appropriate supportive care is provided. Hepatic artery embolization often results in regressions in patients with unresectable liver metastases from carcinoid or pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Therapeutic options for gastrointestinal carcinoids

Although wide surgical resection is the optimal curative therapy for carcinoid tumors, in most patients the presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis usually renders excision a palliative procedure. This nevertheless decreases tumor burden, facilitates symptom control, and prevents complications caused by bleeding, perforation, or bowel obstruction resulting from fibrosis. In the stomach (types I and II) and rectum endoscopic excision may be adequate provided the lesion(s) are local. Long-term therapy is focused on symptom alleviation and improvement of quality of life using somatostatin analogues, particularly in a subcutaneous depot formulation. In some instances interferons may have a role but their usage often is associated with substantial adverse events. Conventional chemotherapy and external radiotherapy either alone or in a variety of permutations are of minimal efficacy and should be balanced against the decrease in quality of life often engendered by such agents. Hepatic metastases may be amenable to surgery, radiofrequency ablation, or embolization either alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents or isotopically loaded microspheres. Rarely hepatic transplantation may be of benefit although controversy exists as to its actual use. Peptide-receptor-targeted radiotherapy for advanced disease using radiolabeled octapeptide analogs (111In/90Yt/177Lu-octreotide) appear promising but data are limited and its status remains investigational. A variety of antiangiogenesis and growth factor-targeted agents have been evaluated, but as yet have shown little promise. The keystone of current therapy remains the long-acting somatostatin analogues that alleviate symptomatology and substantially improve quality of life with minimal adverse effects.

Carcinoid syndrome: diagnosis and medical management

Gastro-intestinal carcinoids are slow growing tumors arising from enterochromaffin or Kulchitsky cells. Their clinical presentation depends on what combination of bioactive substances is secreted. Midgut carcinoid can present with the carcinoid syndrome in the presence of liver metastases. Its most typical clinical manifestations include cutaneous flushing and diarrhea. A nonspecific biochemical tumor marker for carcinoid tumors is serum chromogranin A and a specific marker for the carcinoid syndrome is the increased urinary excretion of 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid (5-HIAA). Localizing studies in carcinoid tumors/syndrome are: transabdominal ultrasonography (US), endoscopy, endoscopic US, videocapsule endoscopy, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, selective abdominal angiography, 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy (and intraoperative radionuclide probe), 123I (131I)-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy, bone scintigraphy and 11C-5-HT positron emission tomography (PET). Therapies for carcinoid tumors/syndrome are: surgery, somatostatin analogs, interferon-alpha, radiotherapy, liver dearterialization, liver (chemo, or radio)-embolization, alcohol sclerotherapy of liver metastases, radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases, cryosurgery of liver metastases, occasionally liver transplantation, radiotherapy-coupled somatostatin analogs, 131I-MIBG and occasionally chemotherapy.

Rare endocrine tumours of the GI tract

Functional pancreatic endocrine tumors other than gastrinoma and insulinoma are quite rare. The principles of management include the diagnosis and management of the functional hormonal syndrome, and management of the potentially malignant tumor. Optimally, control of the hormonal syndrome is achieved preoperatively to stabilize the patient status for the operation, however, resection may be an important part of the control of the hormonal syndrome. Ultimately, the only curative treatment for these neoplasms is complete tumour resection, when feasible.