Serum Amino-Terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Procollagen (P1NP) in Prostate Cancer: A Potential Predictor of Bone Metastases and Prognosticator for Disease Progression and Survival

The Role of procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propertied (P1NP) Cytochrome P450 (CYPs) and Osteoprotegerin (OPG) as Potential Bone function markers in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis

Background: Procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide (PINP) is often present during osteoblast development and could be a biomarker of early bone development. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) may protect tumor cells from apoptosis. Cytochrome P450 enzymes help tumor development and treatment (CYPs). Cytochrome P450 activates and deactivates anticancer drugs and procarcinogens.

Objective: The study examined the amounts of a diagnostic marker of bone formation, the amino terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP), Osteoprotegerin (OPG), and P450, in prostate cancer patients at different stages and its ability to detect osteoblastic metastases.

Methods: ELISA was used to measure PINP, OPG, and P450 levels in 30 prostate cancer patients. (n = 32) and healthy men’s serum (n = 36).

Results: Prostate cancer patients had higher blood levels of PINP, OPG, and P450 than healthy persons (301.3±134.9, 980±467.2, and 84.2±28.4 pg/mL, respectively). Compared to I+II prostate cancer patients, III+IV patients showed higher serum PINP, OPG, and P450 levels (P 0.001). OPG, P450, and PINP had statistically significant Area under the ROC curve (0.9467, P= 0.0001, 0.91, P= 0.0001, and 0.6977, P= 0.4035) in prostate cancer patients.

Conclusions: Metastatic prostate cancer patients had greater PINP, OPG, and P450 levels, according to our findings. PINP, OPG, and P450 levels may affect prostate cancer progression. These findings imply that serum PINP, OPG, and P450 levels may predict and diagnose prostate cancer.

Oncological validation of bone turnover markers c-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (1CTP) and peptides n-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (P1NP) in patients with prostate cancer and bone metastases

Background

Bone formation markers c-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (1CTP) and peptides n-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (P1NP) were reported to be increased in patients with prostate cancer (PC) and bone metastases. The objective of the presented study was to investigate the utility of serum 1CTP and P1NP values in the diagnosis of bone metastases and in predicting oncological outcome in patients with PC.

Methods

In total, serum samples of 186 patients were included retrospectively including 53 (28.50%) benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients and 133 (71.50%) PC-patients. The group of patients with PC consisted of 58 patients with non-metastatic PC (cM0) (43.61%) and 70 (52.63%) patients with bone metastases (cM1b). Serum 1CTP and P1NP were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Results were compared to clinical variables including oncologic follow-up data by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Median 1CTP concentrations were significantly higher in patients with PC compared to the BPH group [5.08 (range, 1.73–158.00) vs. 4.00 (range, 2.18–34.19) µg/L, P=0.019]. However, no significant difference of P1NP levels could be shown for these groups. With median values of 6.04 (1.73–158.00) and 3.91 µg/L (2.04–34.51) for 1CTP and 48.60 (9.12–1,074.37) and 33.90 (8.72–149.30) for P1NP both markers were altered in cM1b patients compared to cM0 patients (P=0.001 each). Furthermore, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter in cM1b patients with higher 1CTP concentrations (P=0.037 and P=0.019, respectively), whereas no associations of P1NP and outcomes were observed.

Conclusions

The present study confirms that increased levels of 1CTP and P1NP concentrations are associated with presence of metastatic disease in the bone. Moreover, these markers are able to predict clinical course in PC patients with bone metastases. The potential use of these markers for treatment selection in advanced PC remains to be determined.

4-Hexylresorcinol inhibits osteoclastogenesis by suppressing the NF-κB signaling pathway and reverses bone loss in ovariectomized mice

4-Hexylresorcinol (4HR) is a small organic compound that is widely used as an antiseptic and antioxidant. In the present study, its role in osteoclastogenesis was investigated. Bone marrow-derived macrophages from mice were used to examine the role of 4HR in osteogenesis. An ovariectomy (OVX) mouse model was constructed to examine the effect of 4HR in vivo, followed by hematoxylin and eosin and tartrate resistant acid phosphatase staining. In the present study, 4HR effectively suppressed receptor activator of NF-κB ligand-induced osteoclastogenesis in a dose-dependent manner. 4HR was also found to significantly suppress the expression of osteoclast (OC)-specific markers, including tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, cathepsin K, nuclear factor of activated T-cell cytoplasmic 1 and c-Fos in the presence of RANKL in BMMs. Furthermore, 4HR inhibited osteoclastogenesis by inhibiting the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway in BMMs. Consistent with the in vitro results, 4HR effectively ameliorated OVX-induced bone loss and markedly reduced OC number in the proximal tibia in vivo. In conclusion, the present results suggested that 4HR inhibited osteoclastogenesis in vitro and rescued bone loss in vivo, suggesting that 4HR may serve as a novel therapeutic agent for osteoporosis treatment.

Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1δ, N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen and cancer-associated fibroblasts are prognostic markers of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients

OBJECTIVE

Identifying markers that influence oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) prognosis is a fundamental strategy to improve the overall survival of patients. Markers such as eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1δ (EEF1D), fascin, N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP), and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) have been noticed in OSCCs and their levels are closely related to the prognosis of tumors. Our aim was to confirm the role of those markers in OSCC prognosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Immunohistochemistry was performed in 90 OSCC specimens. The associations between clinicopathologic features and expression of markers were assessed by χ² test. Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used for survival analysis. Markers were analyzed individually and in combination.

RESULTS

High expression of EEF1D (P = .017) and PINP (P = .02) and abundant density of CAFs in tumor stroma (P = .005) predicted significantly poor survival in OSCC patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that all 3 parameters are individually independent prognostic factors of OSCC patients, and their combination improved the discrimination of patients at high risk for poor survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that the expression of EEF1D and PINP and the density of CAFs might influence the survival of patients with OSCC.

Boldine Ameliorates Estrogen Deficiency-Induced Bone Loss via Inhibiting Bone Resorption

Osteoporosis is an enormous health problem caused by the imbalance between bone resorption and bone formation. The current therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis still have some limitations. Boldine, an alkaloid isolated from Peumus boldus, has been shown to have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in vivo. For the first time, we discover that boldine has a protective effect for the estrogen deficiency-induced bone loss in mice. According to the Micro-CT and histomorphometry assays, boldine conducts this protective effect through inhibiting bone resorption without affecting bone formation in vivo. Moreover, we showed that boldine can inhibit receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL)-induced osteoclast formation via impairing the AKT signaling pathways, while SC79 (an AKT agonist) partially rescue this effect. In conclusion, our results suggest that boldine can prevent estrogen deficiency-induced osteoporosis by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis. Thus, boldine may be served as a novel therapeutic agent for anti-osteoporotic therapy.

A role for bone turnover markers β-CrossLaps (CTX) and amino-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP) as potential indicators for disease progression from MGUS to multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by bone lesions arising due to unbalanced bone remodeling. Changes in the bone formation marker amino-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP) and the bone resorption marker β-CrossLaps (CTX) reflect physiologic bone turnover. Whether PINP and CTX have a role in disease progression from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to MM is unknown. In this cross-sectional follow-up study, 241 patients with MM or MGUS were included. Serum levels of PINP and CTX were significantly higher in MM patients compared to MGUS. Moreover, increasing concentrations of PINP and CTX were observed in those MGUS patients progressing to MM, whereas PINP and CTX levels remained unchanged in MGUS patients with stable disease. In conclusion, these data indicate a potential role of PINP and CTX as biomarkers for the progression of MGUS to MM.

Combined aerobic and resistance training improves bone health of female cancer survivors

INTRODUCTION

Cancer pathogenesis and resulting treatment may lead to bone loss and poor skeletal health in survivorship. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the influence of 26 weeks of combined aerobic and resistance-training (CART) exercise on bone mineral density (BMD) in a multi-racial sample of female cancer survivors.

METHODS

Twenty-six female cancer survivors volunteered to undergo CART for 1 h/day, 3 days/week, for 26 weeks. The Improving Physical Activity After Cancer Treatment (IMPAACT) Program involves supervised group exercise sessions including 20 min of cardiorespiratory training, 25 min of circuit-style resistance-training, and 15 min of abdominal exercises and stretching. BMD at the spine, hip, and whole body was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) before and after the intervention. Serum markers of bone metabolism (procollagen-type I N-terminal propeptide, P1NP, and C-terminal telopeptides, CTX) were measured at baseline, 13 weeks, and at study completion.

RESULTS

Eighteen participants, with the average age of 63.0 ± 10.3 years, completed the program. Mean duration since completion of cancer treatment was 6.2 ± 10.6 years. Paired t-tests revealed significant improvements in BMD of the spine (0.971 ± 0.218 g/cm² vs. 0.995 ± 0.218 g/cm², p = 0.012), hip (0.860 ± 0.184 g/cm² vs. 0.875 ± 0.191 g/cm², p = 0.048), and whole body (1.002 ± 0.153 g/cm² vs. 1.022 ± 0.159 g/cm², p = 0.002). P1NP declined 22% at 13 weeks and 28% at 26 weeks in comparison to baseline (p < 0.01) while CTX showed a non-significant decrease of 8% and 18% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We report significant improvements in BMD at the spine, hip, and whole body for female cancer survivors who completed 26 weeks of CART. This investigation demonstrates the possible effectiveness of CART at improving bone health and reducing risk of osteoporosis for women who have completed cancer treatment. The IMPAACT Program appears to be a safe and feasible way for women to improve health after cancer treatment.

Bone turnover markers in serum and urine as diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring biomarkers of bone metastasis

Bone metastases are characterized by increased osteoblastic and/or osteolytic processes depending on the tumor type. The altogether destructive effect of metastasis formation promoted by increased metabolic activity raises the release of components from the osseous metabolism into the blood stream. These components are either enzymes directly involved in the alteration processes, metabolites/proteins that develop during this or bone matrix proteins released during this. These biomarkers are categorized in relation to their involvement in the bone formation or resorption as bone formation and resorption markers. Based on a PubMed literature search, a critical appraisal of the various biomarkers for diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring purposes is given for patients with skeletal metastases caused by breast, prostate, lung, or renal cell carcinomas.

Predicting the risk of bone metastasis in prostate cancer

The ability to identify prostate cancer patients at 'high risk' for bone metastasis development could allow early selection of those most likely to benefit from interventions to prevent or delay bone metastasis. This review is aimed to identify potential predictors of risk for bone metastasis in newly diagnosed patients and in those who have already received treatment. At diagnosis, established predictors of prostate cancer aggressiveness (e.g. PSA level, clinical stage, Gleason score) can identify patients at risk for bone metastasis. Following treatment of the disease, increasing evidence suggests that absolute PSA levels and other measures of PSA kinetics are useful to aid prediction of bone metastasis risk in patients both with and without a history of ADT. However, which PSA parameter most accurately predicts risk and the cut-off values that should be employed are unclear. Inclusion of PSA parameters to identify a high risk population may be beneficial in whom bone-modifying treatments are being considered. Other novel (but unvalidated) biomarkers that potentially predict the development of bone metastases have been identified, although it is unclear whether they will have value as independent markers or when combined with other parameters (e.g. measures of PSA kinetics). Further prospective studies of PSA kinetics and other predictive markers are, therefore, required to define the optimal criteria for identifying patients at high risk of bone metastases and those who are most likely to benefit from intensive monitoring and therapeutic intervention.

Elevated serum P1NP predicts development of bone metastasis and survival in early-stage breast cancer

Bone is the most common site of metastasis of breast cancer, affecting most women with advanced disease. Procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), osteocalcin, CTX, and IL-6 are markers of bone turnover. Our objective was to determine whether serum levels of these proteins have clinical utility as predictors of breast cancer metastasis to bone. Blood was collected before treatment from 164 patients with stage I-III breast cancer from September 2001 to December 2008. Serum levels of P1NP, CTX, IL-6, and OC were measured using an automated immunoassay system. Correlations of the levels of these markers with time to bone metastasis development and with overall survival (OS) rate were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method. Fifty-five patients with stage I-III disease at the time of blood sample collection subsequently experienced metastasis to bone. A baseline P1NP level of at least 75 ng/mL predicted increased risk of bone metastasis (hazard ratio, 2.7 [95 % confidence interval, 1.2-6.0]; P = 0.031) and a poor OS rate (P = 0.031). Serum P1NP levels at or above 75 ng/mL correlate with a short time to development of bone metastasis and low overall survival in patients with stage I-III breast cancer.

Clinical usefulness of bone markers in prostate cancer with bone metastasis

Bone metastases occur in approximately 70% of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Skeletal-related events have been correlated with reduced survival and quality of life of patients with prostate cancer. Biochemical markers of bone metabolism (e.g. bone formation, bone resorption, osteoclastogenesis) might meet an unmet need for useful, non-invasive and sensitive surrogate information for following patients' skeletal health. Recently, zoledronic acid and denosumab have been proven to have the potential for preventing skeletal-related events among prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis. An improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying bone metastasis has also led to the recognition of multiple molecular targets and advances in therapy. However, estimating the efficacy of these agents is difficult. A clinical trial for castration-resistant prostate cancer is currently underway based on the definition of The Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group, and bone turnover markers are being used as conventional end-points for the clinical trial. Bone turnover markers are useful surrogate markers reflecting the effect of new therapeutic drugs and prognosis, as well as assessment of bone metastases. In particular, N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type 1 collagen and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase are widely used bone metabolism markers, and offer reliable surrogate markers to detect bone metastatic spread and to predict prognosis for prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.

Diagnostic and prognostic use of bone turnover markers

The use of bone turnover markers in oncology includes monitoring of anticancer treatment in patients with malignant disease metastatic to the bones (therapeutic monitoring), predicting the risk of bone relapse in patients with a first diagnosis of potentially curative, early-stage malignant tumors (prognostic use), and making an early diagnosis of (microscopic) malignant bone disease in patients with a known malignant tumor to start early bone-targeted treatment and avoid skeletal-related events (diagnostic use). Concerning prognostic use, there is limited evidence for bone turnover markers to predict the occurrence of metachronous bone metastases in patients with early-stage malignant tumors, with serum PINP (N-terminal propeptide of procollagen type 1), ICTP (Carboxyterminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen), bone sialoprotein (BSP), and tumor immunoexpression of BSP being the most promising candidates. Concerning diagnostic use, serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatise (BSAP), PINP and osteoprotegerin (OPG) were repeatedly shown to be associated with synchronous bone metastases in patients with breast or lung cancer, but sensitivity of these markers was too low to suggest that they might be preferred over conventional bone scans for the diagnosis of bone metastases. A somewhat higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of bone metastases was found for urinary NTx (N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen) and serum ICTP in solid tumor patients, serum TRAcP-5b (Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b) in patients with breast cancer and serum BSAP, PINP and OPG in prostate cancer patients. Both prognostic and diagnostic use of bone turnover markers are reviewed in this chapter.

Consensus on the utility of bone markers in the malignant bone disease setting

Biochemical markers of bone turnover provide insight into ongoing rates of skeletal metabolism and tumor-bone interactions in patients with malignant bone disease. This article reviews the available recent evidence assessing the potential of bone markers for detecting and monitoring malignant bone lesions in patients with advanced cancers, and for assessing overall skeletal health and response to antiresorptive therapies in patients at all stages of cancer progression. Most data thus far are for urinary N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) in predicting risks of skeletal morbidity and death and monitoring response to zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases. Ongoing studies are evaluating such correlations for other markers and therapies. Emerging evidence suggests that bone markers may help identify patients at high risk for bone metastasis or bone lesion progression, thereby allowing improved follow-up. Results from ongoing clinical trials evaluating such potential applications of bone markers are awaited.

Bone markers and their prognostic value in metastatic bone disease: clinical evidence and future directions

BACKGROUND

Bone metastases are prevalent among patients with advanced solid tumors. Metastatic bone disease alters bone homeostasis, resulting in reduced bone integrity and, consequently, increased skeletal complications. Biochemical markers of bone metabolism may meet an unmet need for useful, noninvasive, and sensitive surrogate information for following patients' skeletal health.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for this review were identified by searches of PubMed, and references from relevant articles using the search terms "bone markers" or individual bone marker nomenclature, "cancer," and "metastases." Abstracts and reports from meetings were included only when they related directly to previously published work. Only papers published in English between 1990 and 2007 were included.

RESULTS

Recent retrospective analyses with bisphosphonates, and particularly with zoledronic acid, have shown significant correlations between biochemical markers of bone metabolism levels and clinical outcomes, especially for bone resorption markers. Clinical results for biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption and other emerging markers of bone metabolism including bone sialoprotein, receptor-activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand, osteoprotegerin, and other markers are presented. However, biochemical markers of bone metabolism are not yet an established surrogate endpoint for treatment efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Biochemical markers of bone metabolism may allow physicians to identify which patients with metastatic bone disease are at high risk for skeletal-related events or death and who may be responding to therapy. Prospective randomized clinical trials are underway to further assess the utility of markers of bone metabolism in patients with bone metastases.

The use of molecular markers of bone turnover in the management of patients with metastatic bone disease

Biochemical markers of bone turnover are widely used in clinical practice. These indices have been shown to be associated with the occurrence, prognosis and therapeutic response of malignant bone lesions. For example, markers of bone resorption are often elevated in patients with established bone metastases and while this may point to a role of these markers in the diagnostic workup of cancer patients, the available evidence does not permit any final conclusions as to the accuracy and validity of the presently used markers in the early diagnosis of bone metastases. Many bone turnover markers appear to respond to antiresorptive and antineoplastic therapies, and recent evidence from prospective trials suggests that the aim of bisphosphonate therapy should be to normalize rates of bone remodelling to optimize therapeutic and prognostic outcomes. However, it remains unknown whether the use of bone markers in the routine clinical setting has any defined beneficial effects on overall outcome in cancer patients. Clearly, bone turnover markers have insufficient diagnostic or prognostic value to be used in isolation; however, the combination of these markers with other diagnostic techniques may improve clinical assessment of patients with bone-seeking cancers. This article reviews the available evidence (as of August 2007) on the clinical use of bone turnover markers in the management of patients with metastatic bone disease.

New strategies for the treatment of metastatic bone disease

The introduction of bisphosphonates represents an important advance in the care of patients with metastatic bone disease. Nonetheless, we remain unable to prevent metastatic bone destruction. This review will discuss several novel therapies, including inhibitors of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappabeta, c-Src, mammalian target of rapamycin, cathepsin K, and alpha(5)beta(3) integrins, which could improve our control over this devastating complication.