Feasible Use of Estimated Height for Predicting Outcome by the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Long-Term Care Resident Elderly

Clinical Significance of Nutritional Status, Inflammation, and Body Composition in Elderly Hemodialysis Patients-A Case-Control Study

Nutritional and inflammatory disorders are factors that increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes and mortality in elderly hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study aimed to examine nutritional and inflammation status as well as body composition in older adults on HD compared to matched controls. A case-control study was conducted on 168 older participants (84 HD patients (cases) and 84 controls) age- and sex-matched. Demographic, clinical, anthropometric, and laboratory parameters were collected from medical records. The primary outcome was nutritional status assessment using a combination of nutritional and inflammatory markers along with the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI). Sarcopenic obesity (SO) was studied by the combined application of anthropometric measures. Body composition and hydration status were assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify nutritional and inflammatory independent risk indicators in elderly HD patients and controls. A significantly high prevalence of nutritional risk measured by the GNRI was found in HD patients (32.1%) compared to controls (6.0%) (p < 0.001). Elderly HD patients were overweight and had lower percent arm muscle circumference, phase angle (PA), serum albumin (s-albumin), as well as higher percent extracellular body water (ECW%) and serum C-reactive protein (s-CRP) than controls (all at least, p < 0.01). SO was higher in HD patients (15.50%) than in controls (14.30%). By multi-regression analyses, age < 75 years (OR: 0.119; 95%CI: 0.036 to 0.388), ECW% (OR: 1.162; 95%CI: 1.061 to 1.273), PA (OR: 0.099; 95%CI: 0.036 to 0.271), as well as BMI, s-albumin ≥ 3.8 g/dL, and lower s-CRP were independently related between cases and controls (all at least, p < 0.05). Elderly HD patients had increased nutritional risk, SO, inflammation, overhydration, and metabolic derangements compared to controls. This study highlights the importance of identifying nutritional risk along with inflammation profile and associated body composition disorders in the nutritional care of elderly HD patients. Further studies are needed to prevent nutritional disorders in elderly HD patients.

Nutrition Assessment and Interventions for the Prevention and Treatment of Malnutrition in Older Adults: An Evidence Analysis Center Scoping Review

Older adults living in the community or long-term residence such as a nursing home are at increased risk for malnutrition due to factors such as depression and isolation. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify the best available research that evaluates the validity and reliability of nutrition assessment tools, and the effectiveness of nutrition interventions to prevent or treat malnutrition among older adults. A literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central databases to identify clinical trials, published in the English language, evaluating assessment and intervention methods aimed to treat or prevent malnutrition among older adults living in the community or their long-term residence such as nursing homes. Articles were screened by 2 reviewers, then data were extracted and narratively synthesized. The literature search retrieved 20,937 articles and 197 articles were included in narrative synthesis. A total of 73 assessment articles were identified, 36 of which were validity and reliability trials. A total of 122 intervention articles were identified, the majority of which were randomized controlled trials. A few of the most commonly evaluated interventions were oral nutrition supplements, medical nutrition therapy, fortification and enrichment, and nutrition education. Several systematic reviews were identified, however, that did not meet the criteria of this review. There is a need to conduct systematic reviews for nutrition assessment and intervention trials to guide development of evidence-based nutrition practice recommendations for older adults living in the community or their long-term residence.

Impact of Advancing Age on the Status and Risk of Postoperative Infections After Liver Resection

BACKGROUND

Despite the recently increasing number of elderly patients undergoing liver resection, the impact of advancing age on postoperative infections (PIs) incidence and risk remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of advancing age on PIs incidence and status.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 744 patients undergoing liver resection without biliary reconstruction or combined resection of other organs. Multivariable analysis with a restricted cubic spline was used to evaluate the impact of advancing age on PIs and to determine its association with PIs risk in patients undergoing open and laparoscopic liver resection (OLR and LLR, respectively).

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis demonstrated that advancing age was significantly associated with increased PIs risk (P = 0.017). The spline curve showed that the odds ratio for PIs sharply increased starting approximately at 65 years of age. Unadjusted restricted cubic splines assessing the subcategories of PIs demonstrated that advancing age was associated with increased risks of organ/space surgical site infection and sepsis (P = 0,064 and 0.048, respectively). Multivariable analysis revealed that LLR was associated with the lower PIs risk compared with OLR (P = 0.025), whereas the lower PIs risk with LLR was not significantly obscured by advancing age (P = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Advancing age was associated with increased risk of PIs, including organ/space surgical site infections and sepsis, after liver resection especially in patients aged ≥ 65 years.

Association Between Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Frailty in Older Hospitalized Patients

Objective

Previous studies have explored the association between malnutrition and frailty, but no study has investigated whether the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), a simple and objective nutritional risk screening tool, is associated with the frailty of older adults. The study aimed to examine the relationship between nutrition-related risk, as assessed by the GNRI, and frailty among older hospitalized patients.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University with 740 patients aged ≥70 years between March 2016 and Jan 2017. Nutritional and frailty status was evaluated with the GNRI and FRAIL scale, respectively. The adjusted and unadjusted ordinal logistic regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between nutritional risk and frailty. The ability of GNRI in detecting frailty was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

The prevalence of low, moderate, and severe nutritional risk among frail patients were 30.1%, 27.6%, and 12.5%, respectively. Ordinal logistic regression analysis showed that malnutrition assessed by the GNRI had a significant association with frailty after adjustment of age, sex, polypharmacy, comorbidity, vision impairment, hearing impairment, cognitive impairment, and depression. In the ROC analysis, the area under the curve for GNRI identifying frailty was 0.698 (95% CI: 0.66-0.74; P<0.001), and the optimal cut-point value was 97.16 (sensitivity: 64.3%; specificity: 66.9%).

Conclusion

Nutrition-related risk screened by the GNRI was independently associated with frailty. The GNRI could be used as a simple tool in detecting nutritional risk and frailty status of older patients.

The geriatric nutrition risk index versus the mini-nutritional assessment short form in predicting postoperative delirium and hospital length of stay among older non-cardiac surgical patients: a prospective cohort study

Backgrounds

Malnutrition has been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in older surgical patients. Several tools are available for detecting malnutrition. But little is known about their ability to assess risks of postoperative adverse outcomes. The study aimed to compare the ability of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and the Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) in predicting postoperative delirium (POD) and length of stay (LOS) among older non-cardiac surgical patients.

Methods

Prospective study of 288 older non-cardiac surgical patients from the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Preoperative nutritional status was assessed using the GNRI and MNA-SF, and patients were followed for the occurrence of POD and LOS. Multivariable logistic regression and linear regression analyses were used to identify predictors of these outcomes. The relative performance of the GNRI and MNA-SF as predictors of these outcomes were determined by Receiver Operating Characteristic curves (ROC) analyses and the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Multivariable analysis revealed that preoperative malnutrition by the MNA-SF was significantly associated with POD. Linear regression analysis showed that preoperative low/high nutritional risk of the GNRI and malnutrition by the MNA-SF were independent predictors of prolonged LOS. Moreover, the area under the curve (AUC) of MNA-SF scores for POD was better than GNRI scores (AUC = 0.718, 95%CI: 0.64–0.80, P < 0.001 vs AUC = 0.606, 95%CI: 0.52–0.69, P = 0.019; Delong’s test, P = 0.006), but the AUC of GNRI scores and MNA-SF scores have no significant difference when predicting prolonged LOS (AUC = 0.611, 95%CI: 0.54–0.69, P = 0.006 vs AUC = 0.533, 95%CI: 0.45–0.62, P = 0.421; Delong’s test, P = 0.079).

Conclusion

The MNA-SF was more effective than the GNRI at predicting the development of POD, but the two nutrition screening methods have similar performance in predicting prolonged LOS among older non-cardiac surgical patients.

Altura do joelho como medida alternativa confiável na avaliação nutricional de idosos

Objetivo:Avaliar o uso da altura do joelho como medida alternativa confiável na avaliação nutricional de idosos atendidos em um ambulatório de geriatria.Métodos:Estudo transversal com idosos atendidos em ambulatório de geriatria de um hospital universitário, entre novembro de 2009 e novembro de 2010. Variáveis investigadas: gênero, idade, peso, estatura, altura do joelho, estatura estimada através das equações de Chumlea, índice de massa corporal para as medidas de estatura aferida e estimada e classificado segundo Lipschitz, e dados sociodemográficos. Na análise descritiva dos dados foram usadas medidas de tendência central, dispersão e proporção; a homogeneidade entre as medidas foi verificada através do coeficiente de correlação intraclasse e do gráfico de Bland e Altman e a concordância entre a avaliação nutricional baseada no índice de massa corporal calculado a partir da estatura aferida e a avaliação nutricional baseada no índice de massa corporal calculado a partir da estatura estimada foi avaliada através do coeficiente Kappa ponderado com pesos quadráticos.Resultados:Foram avaliados 186 idosos com média de idade de 74,3±7,1 anos. A média do índice de massa corporal aferido e estimado foi 28,96±5,86 kg/m2e 27,95±5,47 kg/m2, respectivamente, e a prevalência de sobrepeso foi de 59,7% para o índice de massa corporal aferido e 53,2% para o estimado. Foi observada uma boa concordância (Kappa=0,79; p<0,001) entre as duas avaliações.Conclusão:Os resultados mostraram ser possível utilizar a altura do joelho na estimativa da estatura para cálculo do índice de massa corporal em idosos atendidos em ambulatório, alternativa útil para aqueles que apresentam limitações na aferição das medidas, sendo esta uma medida alternativa importante na avaliação nutricional de idosos.

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index predicts hospital length of stay and in-hospital weight loss in elderly patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Nutritional derangements are common in elderly patients, but how nutritional risk affects outcome in this subset of hospital inpatients deserves further investigation. We evaluated the impact of nutritional risk on length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital weight loss (WL) in elderly patients (>65 yrs).

METHODS

Nutritional risk was assessed by the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) in a prospective multicentre hospital-based cohort study. The outcomes were LOS and in-hospital WL.

RESULTS

In the whole sample (N = 667), the prevalence of high (GNRI < 92) and mild (GNRI: 92-98) nutritional risk were 33% and 25%, respectively. Patients with a high nutritional risk were more likely (OR = 1.89; 95%CI: 1.22-2.92) to stay longer in hospital (fourth quartile, LOS ≥ 20 days) compared to those without. Other factors associated with prolonged LOS were cancer diagnosis (OR = 2.52; 95%CI: 1.69-3.75), the presence of comorbidities (OR = 1.24; 95%CI: 1.11-1.40) and surgical setting (OR = 1.65; 95%CI: 1.10-2.47). In-hospital WL ≥ 5% was recorded in 75 ambulant patients from a representative subgroup (N = 583). It was independently associated with prolonged LOS (OR = 1.80; 95%CI: 1.03-3.06) and was more frequent among cancer patients (OR = 1.88; 95%CI: 1.09-3.24), in patients with a high nutritional risk (OR = 2.23; 95%CI: 1.20-4.14) or those admitted to surgical units (OR = 1.77; 95%CI: 1.02-3.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Nutritional risk assessed by the GNRI on admission, predicts LOS and in-hospital WL in elderly patients.

Nutritional risk, functional status and mortality in newly institutionalised elderly

Previous studies have reported a close relationship between nutritional and functional domains, but evidence in long-term care residents is still limited. We evaluated the relationship between nutritional risk and functional status and the association of these two domains with mortality in newly institutionalised elderly. In the present multi-centric prospective cohort study, involving 346 long-term care resident elderly, nutritional risk and functional status were determined upon admission by the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and the Barthel Index (BI), respectively. The prevalence of high (GNRI <92) and low (GNRI 92–98) nutritional risk were 36·1 and 30·6 %, respectively. At multivariable linear regression, functional status was independently associated with age (P=0·045), arm muscle area (P=0·048), the number of co-morbidities (P=0·027) and mainly with the GNRI (P<0·001). During a median follow-up of 4·7 years (25th–75th percentile 3·7–6·2), 230 (66·5 %) subjects died. In the risk analysis, based on the variables collected at baseline, both high (hazard ratio (HR) 1·86, 95% CI 1·32, 2·63; P<0·001) and low nutritional risk (HR 1·52, 95% CI 1·08, 2·14; P=0·016) were associated with all-cause mortality. Participants at high nutritional risk (GNRI <92) also showed an increased rate of cardiovascular mortality (HR 1·93, 95% CI 1·28, 2·91; P<0·001). No association with outcome was found for the BI. Upon admission, nutritional risk was an independent predictor of functional status and mortality in institutionalised elderly. Present data support the concept that the nutritional domain is more relevant than functional status to the outcome of newly institutionalised elderly.

Nutritional screening and mortality in newly institutionalised elderly: a comparison between the geriatric nutritional risk index and the mini nutritional assessment

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Several tools are available for nutritional screening. We evaluated the risk of mortality associated with the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) in newly institutionalised elderly.

METHODS

A prospective observational study involving 358 elderly newly admitted to a long-term care setting. Hazard ratios (HR) for mortality among GNRI categories and MNA classes were estimated by multivariable Cox's model.

RESULTS

At baseline, 32.4% and 37.4% of the patients were classified as being malnourished (MNA <17) and at severe nutritional risk (GNRI <92), respectively, whereas 57.5% and 35.2%, respectively, were classified as being at risk for malnutrition (MNA 17-23.5) and having low nutritional risk (GNRI 92-98). During a median follow-up of 6.5 years [25th-75th percentile, 5.9-8.6], 297 elderly died. Risk for all-cause mortality was significantly associated with nutritional risk by the GNRI tool (GNRI<92 HR = 1.99 [95%CI, 1.38-2.88]; GNRI 92-98 HR = 1.51 [95%CI, 1.04-2.18]) but not with nutritional status by the MNA. A significant association was also found with cardiovascular mortality (GNRI <92 HR = 1.79 [95%CI, 1.23-2.61]).

CONCLUSIONS

Nutritional risk by GNRI but not nutritional status by MNA was associated with higher mortality risk. Present data suggest that in the nutritional screening of newly institutionalised elderly the use of the GNRI should be preferred to that of the MNA.

Estimated height from knee-height in Caucasian elderly: implications on nutritional status by mini nutritional assessment

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if the use of estimated height (EH) by currently available prediction formulas might affect the screening and outcome prediction attitudes of both the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its short-form version (MNA-SF).

DESIGN

A 6-month observational study.

SETTING

Two long-term cares of the province of Como.

PARTICIPANTS

266 resident elderly (102 men, 164 women; mean age +/- SD: 80.4 +/- 8.6 years).

MEASUREMENTS

Subjects were studied by anthropometry (weight, standing height, knee-height, arm and calf circumferences, triceps skinfold) and biochemistry (albumin and prealbumin). Nutritional status was assessed using both MNA and MNA-SF. At 6 months, major outcome were: death, infections and bedsores.

RESULTS

In overall population, prediction formulas significantly underestimated real height. The bias by Italian-specific equation was higher than that by nationally-representative formulas for white Americans. The use of EHs produced significant differences in body mass index (BMI) but these did not affect nutritional status scoring by MNA and MNA-SF (r > or =0.99, p < 0.0001). Cohen's kappa statistic also showed an almost perfect concordance (kappa > 0.9). Moreover, similar degrees of correlation were found between nutritional parameters and both MNA and MNA-SF scores by BMI from SH and EHs. After 6 months, major complications occurred in twenty-eight patients (11.6%). The use EHs did not affect the distribution of events among MNA and MNA-SF nutritional classes.

CONCLUSION

In Italian elderly, height prediction by nationally representative equations for white Americans should be preferred to that by ethnic-specifc formula. However, the use of both models does not seem to affect nutritional screening and outcome prediction by MNA and MNA-SF.

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A new nutrition-related risk assessment tool, the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), has been recently proposed. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidences on the use of this tool with particular focus on the rationales of its application in elderly healthcare.

RECENT FINDINGS

Structured as a dichotomous index, based on serum albumin values and the discrepancy between real and ideal weight, the GNRI seems to account for both acute and chronic reasons of nutrition-related complications. It allows us to face the frequent difficulties in obtaining a profitable participation of the old patient to nutritional assessment. Its application appears feasible in all healthcare settings in which it shows adequacy to discriminate different profiles of nutritional risk. A GNRI less than 92 might be suggested as clinical trigger for routine nutritional support.

SUMMARY

In maths of nutrition 'recognize and treat' has become a clinical imperative. Actually, clinical judgement by an expert is still considered the reference standard to diagnose malnutrition but the use of simplified tools profitably assists in nutritional risk screening process. The GNRI is easy to use and preliminary results show that it is promising. Its routine application, next to the other validated tools already available, might be enforced in the assessment of the old patient.