Advanced gastric carcinoma with signet ring cell histology

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival of elderly patients with unresected gastric cancer who received chemotherapy

This investigation aimed to explore the prognostic factors in elderly patients with unresected gastric cancer (GC) who have received chemotherapy and to develop a nomogram for predicting their cancer-specific survival (CSS). Elderly gastric cancer patients who have received chemotherapy but no surgery in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database between 2004 and 2015 were included in this study. Cox analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors, leading to the formulation of a nomogram. The nomogram was validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves. The findings elucidated six prognostic factors encompassing grade, histology, M stage, radiotherapy, tumor size, and T stage, culminating in the development of a nomogram. The ROC curve indicated that the area under curve of the nomogram used to predict CSS for 3, 4, and 5 years in the training queue as 0.689, 0.708, and 0.731, and in the validation queue, as 0.666, 0.693, and 0.708. The calibration curve indicated a high degree of consistency between actual and predicted CSS for 3, 4, and 5 years. This nomogram created to predict the CSS of elderly patients with unresected GC who have received chemotherapy could significantly enhance treatment accuracy.

Multimodal Therapy Versus Primary Surgery for Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Diffuse Type Carcinoma, with a Focus on Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Nationwide Study

BACKGROUND

Diffuse type adenocarcinoma and, more specifically, signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) have a poor prognosis and the value of neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy (nCRT) is unclear.

METHODS

All patients who underwent surgery for diffuse type gastric and GEJ carcinoma between 2004 and 2015 were retrospectively included from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was overall survival after surgery. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted. Furthermore, multivariable Poisson and Cox regressions were performed, correcting for confounders. To comply with the Cox regression proportional hazard assumption, gastric cancer survival was split into two groups, i.e. <90 days and >90 days, postoperatively by adding an interaction variable.

RESULTS

Analyses included 2046 patients with diffuse type cancer: 1728 gastric cancers (50% SRCC) and 318 GEJ cancers (39% SRCC). In the gastric cancer group, 49% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and 51% received primary surgery (PS). All-cause mortality within 90 days postoperatively was lower after nCT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.44; p < 0.001). Also after 90 days, mortality was lower in the nCT group (HR for the interaction variable 2.84, 95% CI 1.87-4.30, p < 0.001; total HR 0.29*2.84 = 0.84). In the GEJ group, 38% received nCT, 22% received nCRT, and 39% received PS. All-cause mortality was lower after nCT (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.93; p = 0.020) compared with PS. The nCRT group was removed from the Cox regression analysis since the Kaplan-Meier curves of nCRT and PS intersected. The results for gastric and GEJ carcinomas were similar between the SRCC and non-SRCC subgroups.

CONCLUSION

For gastric and GEJ diffuse type cancer, including SRCC, nCT was associated with increased survival.

A Prognostic Model for Survival in Patients with Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The objective of our study was to develop a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC).

METHODS

A total of 3,408 GSRCC patients between 1975 and 2017 were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors for the construction of a nomogram. The performance of the model was then assessed by the concordance index (C-index), calibration plot, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Then, the novel nomogram was further assessed by 64 GSRCC patients from our hospital as the external cohort.

RESULTS

We identified age, tumor lymph node metastasis (TNM) staging system, surgery, and chemotherapy as significant independent elements of prognosis. On this basis, a nomogram was constructed, with a C-index of OS in the training and validation cohorts of 0.763 (95% CI: 0.751-0.774) and 0.766 (95% CI: 0.748-0.784) and a C-index of CSS of 0.765 (95% CI: 0.753-0.777) and 0.773 (95% CI: 0.755-0.791), respectively. The AUCs of the nomogram for predicting 2- and 5-year OS were 0.848 and 0.885, respectively, and those for predicting CSS were 0.854 and 0.899, respectively, demonstrating the excellent predictive value of the constructed nomogram compared to the traditional AJCC staging system. Similar results were also observed in both the internal and external validation sets.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram provided an accurate tool to predict OS and CSS in patients with GSRCC, which can assist clinicians in making predictions about individual patient survival.

Gastric Extent of Tumor Predicts Peritoneal Metastasis in Siewert II Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Whereas current guidelines recommend staging laparoscopy for most patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer, such a recommendation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (AEG) is lacking. This study sought to identify baseline clinicopathologic characteristics associated with peritoneal metastasis (PM) among patients with Siewert II AEG.

METHODS

Trimodality therapy-eligible patients with Siewert II AEG (2000-2015, single institution) were retrospectively identified. A composite PM outcome was defined as follows: (1) PM at staging laparoscopy; (2) PM diagnosed during neoadjuvant chemoradiation; or (3) PM ≤6 months postoperatively. Logistic regression was used to identify features associated with PM; bootstrapped analysis (Youden J) identified the distal tumor extension that best discriminated the composite outcome.

RESULTS

Of 188 patients, a composite PM outcome was observed in 26 of 188 (13.8%); 12 of 26 had positive staging laparoscopy, 10 of 26 experienced PM during chemoradiation, and 4 of 26 had PM ≤6 months postoperatively. Tumor extension below the GEJ was greater in patients with PM (median, 4.0 cm [interquartile range, 3.0-5.0] vs 3.0 cm [interquartile range, 2.0-3.0]; P < .001). All patients with PM had cT3 to cT4 tumors. Among patients with cT3 to cT4 tumors (n = 168 of 188; 89.4%), distal tumor extent (odds ratio, 1.67/cm; 95% CI, 1.23-2.28; P = .001) was independently associated with increased odds of PM. Gastric tumor extension ≥4 cm remained independently associated with PM (OR, 5.14; 95% CI, 2.11-12.53; P < .001) after adjustment for signet ring cell status.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal tumor extent beyond the GEJ is independently associated with increased odds of PM in patients with Siewert II AEG. Patients with extensive gastric involvement should therefore be considered for staging laparoscopy before trimodality therapy.

Development and validation of a predictive model associated with lymph node metastasis of gastric signet ring carcinoma patients

The risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC) have not been well-defined. This study was designed to prognosticate LNM in patients with GSRC by constructing and verifying a nomogram. A total of 2789 patients with GSRC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College (YJS) were retrospectively reviewed. A predictive model was established using logistic regression based on the SEER cohort. The performance of the model was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and decision curve analysis (DCA). In addition, its robustness was validated using the YJS cohort. Four independent predictors of LNM were identified in the SEER cohort. Next, a nomogram was constructed by incorporating these predictors. The C-index were 0.800 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.781-0.819) and 0.837 (95% CI = 0.784-0.890) in the training and external validation cohorts, respectively. The outcomes of DCA supported good clinical benefits. The proposed model for evaluating the LNM in patients with GSRC can help to avoid the misdiagnosis risk of N-stage, assist to screen the population suitable for neoadjuvant therapy and help clinicians to optimize clinical decisions.

The percentages of signet-ring cells (SRCs) affects the prognosis after radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Only recently has the percentage of signet-ring cells (SRCs) been shown to affect the prognosis following gastric cancer surgery. It is uncertain whether the SRC percentage has a role in tumour biology or prognosis of gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC). For this research, we assessed the effect of the SRC percentage on the clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of gastric cancer (GC) tumours and created and verified a prognostic nomogram to assess the overall survival (OS) of GSRCC patients.

METHODS

In our study, 1100 GC patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from December 2013 to December 2018 who underwent curative gastric cancer resection were retrospectively analysed. The patients were separated into two groups: those with SRCC (SRC percentage >50%; n = 157) and those with partial signet-ring cell carcinoma (PSRCC) (SRC percentage ≤50%; n = 943). We compared the clinicopathological characteristics of both groups. To estimate OS and determine correlations with the SRC percentage, the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used. To develop the prognostic nomogram, independent prognostic indicators for OS were identified using Cox regression analyses. Predictions were assessed using the calibration curve and C-index.

RESULTS

Our research showed that there was no discernible difference in OS between the two groups. The preoperative CA242 level, pT stage, pN stage, age, nerve invasion, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative chemotherapy, and maximum tumour diameter were independent prognostic risk factors for OS for GC (all p < 0.05). However, for advanced GC, the SRC percentage (HR = 1.571, 95% CI 1.072-2.302, p = 0.020) was an independent prognostic factor of OS. Other independent prognostic risk factors were age, pT stage, pN stage, nerve invasion, tumour location, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative chemotherapy, preoperative CA50 level, and preoperative CEA level (all p < 0.05). On these bases, nomograms were constructed for GC and advanced GC, with C-indexes of 0.806 (95%CI 0.782-0.830) and 0.728 (95%CI 0.697-0.759), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of advanced gastric cancer, the SRC percentage served as a standalone prognostic indicator for OS. An effective tool for assessing the prognosis of GSRCC was offered by the nomogram.

Clinicopathological and prognostic features of Borrmann type IV gastric cancer versus other Borrmann types: A unique role of signet ring cell carcinoma

Background

Evidence specifically comparing the clinicopathology of Borrmann type IV (B-IV) gastric cancer with that of other Borrmann types is insufficient.

Methods

A total of 3130 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy from January 2001 to September 2017 were enrolled in the analysis. Logistic regression and survival analysis methodology were used to investigate factors associated with peritoneal metastasis and overall survival (OS).

Results

Of the total cohort, 264 (8.43%) patients were B-IV type, 1752 (55.97%) were small-size other Borrmann types, and 1114 (35.59%) were large-size other Borrmann types. Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) was more common in B-IV types than in other Borrmann types (33.71% vs 11.42% vs 12.66%, P < 0.001). In B-IV gastric cancers, SRC was significantly associated with peritoneal metastasis (HR = 1.898, 95% CI = 1.112 ~ 3.241, P = 0.019) and poorer OS (HR = 1.492, 95% CI = 1.088 ~ 2.045, P = 0.013) in multivariable analysis. Furthermore, stratified analysis revealed that SRC had worse survival than adenocarcinoma in the B-IV subgroups, with locally advanced stages (stages II ~ III) or negative surgical margins (all P < 0.05). In contrast, SRC failed to be significantly associated with peritoneal metastasis and poor OS in other Borrmann types (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

SRC was more common in B-IV gastric cancer than in other Borrmann types. It was significantly associated with peritoneal metastasis and poorer OS in the B-IV type but not in other Borrmann types. As a unique prognostic factor for B-IV gastric cancer, SRC might help evaluate risk stratification and optimize treatment for this entity, especially for patients with locally advanced stages or R0 resection.

Lymphangitic carcinomatosis as the initial manifestation of primary signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma of the lung: A case report

Signet-ring cell carcinomas are an aggressive, poorly differentiated, and highly invasive adenocarcinoma carrying a poor prognosis. Most of these tumors originate in gastrointestinal organs; however, primary lung signet-ring cell adenocarcinomas can rarely occur. Tumoral lymphatic infiltration is a complication of these tumors and can cause phenomena such as lymphangitic carcinomatosis, characterized by a nodular thickening of the pleura, pleural effusions, and mediastinal lymphadenopathies. We report a case of a 63-year-old ex-smoker with a 2-week clinical course of dyspnea and pleuritic chest pain in which a nodular thickening of the pleura and pleural effusion were documented and led to the diagnosis of a primary signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma of the lung with lymphangitic carcinomatosis. This complication has never been described in the context of a primary lung tumor of this subtype. Both entities carry a high mortality and have no therapeutical options. This report adds to the information available about them.

Risk prediction model of peritoneal seeding in advanced gastric cancer: A decision tool for diagnostic laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

Selective diagnostic laparoscopy in gastric cancer patients at high risk of peritoneal metastasis is essential for optimal treatment planning. In this study available clinicopathologic factors predictive of peritoneal seeding in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) were identified, and this information was translated into a clinically useful tool.

METHODS

Totally 2833 patients underwent surgery for AGC between 2003 and 2013. The study identified clinicopathologic factors associated with the risk of peritoneal seeding for constructing nomograms using a multivariate logistic regression model with backward elimination. A nomogram was constructed to generate a numerical value indicating risk. Accuracy was validated using bootstrapping and cross-validation.

RESULTS

The proportion of seeding positive was 12.7% in females and 9.6% in males. Of 2833 patients who underwent surgery for AGC, 300 (10.6%) were intraoperatively identified with peritoneal seeding. Multivariate analysis revealed the following factors associated with peritoneal seeding: high American Society of Anesthesiologists score, fibrinogen, Borrmann type 3 or 4 tumors, the involvement of the middle, anterior, and greater curvature, cT3 or cT4cN1 or cN2 or cN3, cM1, and the presence of ascites or peritoneal thickening or plaque or a nodule on the peritoneal wall on computed tomography. The bootstrap analysis revealed a robust concordance between mean and final parameter estimates. The area under the ROC curve for the final model was 0.856 (95% CI, 0.835-0.877), which implies good performance.

CONCLUSIONS

This nomogram provides effective risk estimates of peritoneal seeding from gastric cancer and can facilitate individualized decision-making regarding the selective use of diagnostic laparoscopy.

PN3b as an independent risk factor for poor prognosis and peritoneal recurrence in Borrmann type IV gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The clinicopathological features and surgical treatment strategies of Borrmann type IV gastric cancer (GC) remain controversial. Peritoneal metastasis is the most common recurrence pattern in patients with Borrmann type IV GC.

METHODS

Among 2026 gastric cancer between January 2009 and August 2019, 159 cases of Borrmann type IV GC were included in this study (7.8%). We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of these patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards were applied to identify independent prognostic factors. Predictors related to peritoneal metastasis of type IV GC were analyzed by multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Borrmann type IV gastric cancer was associated with more advanced clinicopathological features at diagnosis than the other Borrmann type GC. Of the 159 patients with Borrmann type IV GC, the median OS was 23 months. The number of patients with peritoneal metastasis was 43, accounted for 27.0% of all the patients and 87.8% of the patients with distant metastasis. Multivariate analyses revealed lymph node metastasis to be independent prognostic factor for survival in Borrmann type IV GC patients. pN3b and tumor size > 50 mm showed to be risk factors for peritoneal metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Borrmann type IV GC is an important independent prognostic factor. pN3b is an independent prognostic factor and a predictor of peritoneal metastasis in patients with Borrmann type IV GC.

Poorly cohesive cells gastric carcinoma including signet-ring cell cancer: Updated review of definition, classification and therapeutic management

While the incidence of gastric cancer (GC) in general has decreased worldwide in recent decades, the incidence of diffuse cancer historically comprising poorly cohesive cells-GC (PCC-GC) and including signet ring cell cancer is rising. Literature concerning PCC-GC is scarce and unclear, mostly due to a large variety of historically used definitions and classifications. Compared to other histological subtypes of GC, PCC-GC is nevertheless characterized by a distinct set of epidemiological, histological and clinical features which require a specific diagnostic and therapeutic approach. The aim of this review was to provide an update on the definition, classification and therapeutic strategies of PCC-GC. We focus on the updated histological definition of PCC-GC, along with its implications on future treatment strategies and study design. Also, specific considerations in the diagnostic management are discussed. Finally, the impact of some recent developments in the therapeutic management of GC in general such as the recently validated taxane-based regimens (5-Fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel), the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as well as pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy and targeted therapy have been reviewed in depth for their relative importance for PCC-GC in particular.

Comparison between signet-ring cell carcinoma and non-signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: clinicopathological parameters, epidemiological data, outcome, and prognosis-a cohort study of 123 patients from a non-endemic country

Background

Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach (SRCC) is a particular gastric cancer entity. Its incidence is increasing. Its diagnosis is pathological; it corresponds to adenocarcinoma with a majority of signet-ring cells component (> 50%).

These histological features give it its aggressiveness characteristics. This has repercussions on the prognostic level and implications for the alternatives of therapy, especially since some authors suggest a potential chemoresistance.

This survey aimed to identify the epidemiological, pathological, therapeutic, and prognostic characteristics of SRCC as a separate disease entity.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 123 patients admitted for gastric adenocarcinoma to Habib Thameur Hospital in Tunis over 11 years from January 2006 to December 2016. A comparative study was performed between 2 groups: the SRCC group with 62 patients and the non-SRCC (non-signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach) with 61 patients.

Results

The prevalence of SRCC in our series was 50%. SRCC affected significantly younger patients (55 vs 62 years; p = 0.004). The infiltrative character was more common in SRCC tumors (30.6 vs 14.8%; p = 0.060), whereas the budding character was more often noted in non-SRCC tumors (78.7 vs 58.1%; p = 0.039). There was no significant difference in tumor localization between both groups. Linitis plastica was noted in 14 patients with SRCC against a single patient with non-SRCC (p = 0.001). The tumor size was more important in the non-SRCC group (6.84 vs 6.39 cm; p = 0.551). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was noted in 4.3% of cases in the SRCC group versus 2.2% of cases in the NSRCC group (p = 0.570). Total gastrectomy was more often performed in the SRCC group (87 vs 56%; p = 0.001). Resection was more often curative in the non-SRCC group (84.4 vs 78.3%; p = 0.063). Postoperative chemotherapy was more commonly indicated in the SRCC group (67.4 vs 53.3%; p = 0.339). Tumor recurrence was more common in the non-SRCC group (35.7 vs 32%; p = 0.776). The most common type of recurrence was peritoneal carcinomatosis in the SRCC group (62.5%) and hepatic metastasis in the non-SRCC group (60%; p = 0.096). The overall 5-year survival in the SRCC group was lower than in the non-SRCC group, with no statistically significant difference (47.1 vs 51.5%; p = 0.715). The overall survival was more important for SRCC in early cancer (100 vs 80%; p = 0.408), whereas it was higher for non-SRCC in advanced cancer (48.1 vs 41.9%; p = 0.635).

Conclusion

Apart from its epidemiological and pathological features, SRCC seems to have a worse prognosis. Indeed, it is diagnosed at a more advanced stage and has a worse prognosis in advanced cancer than non-SRCC. It is therefore to be considered as a particular entity of gastric adenocarcinoma requiring a specific therapeutic protocol where the place of chemotherapy remains to be more investigated.

Differential Expression of Genes Involved in Metabolism and Immune Response in Diffuse and Intestinal Gastric Cancers, a Pilot Ptudy

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the major causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The vast majority of GC cases are adenocarcinomas including intestinal and diffuse GC. The incidence of diffuse GCs, often associated with poor overall survival, has constantly increased in USA and Europe The molecular basis of diffuse GC aggressivity remains unclear. Using mRNA from diffuse and intestinal GC tumor samples of a Western cohort, this study reports the expression level of the immunomodulatory aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), and genes involved in immune suppression (PD1, PD-L1, PD-L2) and the early steps of tryptophan metabolism (IDO1, IDO2, TDO2). Strongly increased expression of IDO1 (p < 0.001) and PD1 (p < 0.003) was observed in the intestinal sub-type. The highest expression of IDO1 and PDL1 correlated with early clinical stage and absence of lymphatic invasion (×25 p = 0.004, ×3 p = 0.04, respectively). Our results suggest that kynurenine, produced by tryptophan catabolism, and AhR activation play a central role in creating an immunosuppressive environment. Correspondingly, as compared to intestinal GCs, expression levels of IDO1-TDO2 and PD-L1 were less prominent in diffuse GCs which also had less infiltration of immune cells, suggesting an inactive immune response in the advanced diffuse GC. Confirmation of these patterns of gene expression will require a larger cohort of early and advanced stages of diffuse GC samples.

Prognostic Significance of Signet Ring Cells in Gastric Cancer: The Higher Proportion, The Better Survival

Background

Due to the fact that the definition of gastric signet ring cell cancer (GSRC) was still controversial in the past decades, the prognosis affected by the proportion of signet ring cells within gastric cancer is uncertain. This study compared the clinicopathological features and prognosis of GSRC with the various proportions of signet ring cells.

Methods

We collected GSRC cases without metastasis who underwent curative (R0) resection between 2011 and 2018. Individuals who were in the low-proportion signet ring cell group (LSRC, <50%) were matched to those who were in the high-proportion signet ring cell group (HSRC, >50%) through propensity score matching (1:1). We used Cox proportional hazard regression to calculate the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and explored interactions with gender and stage.

Results

We had 1:1 matched individuals including 231 cases from the LSRC group and 231 cases from the HSRC group. Patients with HSRC had a significantly higher overall survival rate in the multivariable model (aHR = 0.56, 95%CI = 0.38, 0.84) compared with those with LSRC. The association of HSRC appeared to be more substantial among individuals at early stage and N0 stage (p-interaction < 0.01).

Conclusions

This study confirms that GSRC with different proportions of signet ring cells could affect the survival of the patient. Further clinical studies should be developed in the future to provide an appropriate treatment strategy for GSRC.

Clinical significance of coexisting histological diffuse type in stage II/III gastric cancer

Since 1965, the Laurén classification has been used most commonly for gastric adenocarcinoma, with two main types: intestinal type and diffuse type. Signet ring cell carcinoma (Sig) and non-solid poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (Por2) are the histological forms of diffuse type that are often found in advanced tumors, and they seem to be associated with a poor prognosis. S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II/III gastric cancer has generally been accepted in Japan, but histological type does not alter treatment strategy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic impact of the histopathological mixture of Sig and Por2 in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer treated with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. The clinicopathological data of 968 patients with gastric carcinoma who underwent gastrectomy between 2007 and 2016 at Osaka City University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. In the present study, tumors containing Sig or Por2 were classified as diffuse type, and those not containing them were classified as intestinal type. There were 307 cases of diffuse type and 661 cases of intestinal type. Diffuse type included 189 cases with Sig. A pathological diagnosis of Sig was an independent risk factor for peritoneal recurrence in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer. Patients with diffuse type had a worse overall survival rate than those with intestinal type at stage III gastric cancer. Among the patients who received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy, the prognosis of patients with stage III gastric cancer with Sig but not Por2 was significantly worse compared with that of patients with intestinal type. Therefore, the present study revealed that the coexistence of Sig in the primary tumor was associated with a poor prognosis in patients with stage III gastric cancer. The current findings suggested that, since mixed Sig gastric cancer had a high risk of peritoneal recurrence even if adjuvant chemotherapy was performed, the pathological diagnosis should be considered when determining the therapeutic strategy for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III gastric cancer.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Signet Ring Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Background

To better define the clinicopathologic characteristics of signet ring cell (SRC) gastric cancer and build a prognostic model for it.

Methods

SRC patient information from 2010 to 2015 were identified using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate Overall survival (OS) and to determine associations with histologic subtypes. In COX proportional hazards regression model–based univariate and multivariate analyses, significant variables for construction of a nomogram were screened out. The nomogram was validated by means of the concordance index (CI), calibration plots, and receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) curves.

Results

A total of 11,363 gastric cancer patients were enrolled. On dividing the patients into SRC, well-to-moderately differentiated (WMD) adenocarcinoma, and poorly differentiated (PD) adenocarcinoma, differences among these subgroups emerged. SRC patients were more likely to occur in female and young patients than other histologic subtypes. Larger tumors, stage T4, and node stage N3 were more likely to be found in the SRC group. The survival for SRC patients was better than non-SRC patients in stage I. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified age, tumor site, larger tumor size, advanced T classification, advanced N classification, advanced TNM stage, and surgery of primary site as independent prognostic indicators. Then an OS nomogram was formulated.

Conclusions

SRC had distinct clinicopathological characteristics. The nomogram provided an accurate tool to evaluate the prognosis of SRC.

The efficiency of D1(+) lymphadenectomy in signet ring cell carcinoma: comparison of postoperative early and late outcomes between standard lymphadenectomy and D1(+) lymphadenectomy

Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a poorly cohesive subtype of gastric cancer. It is more aggressive than other types of gastric cancer. There is no special method for its treatment, but gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy is the standard approach. The aim of this study is to investigate postoperative outcomes of D1 lymphadenectomy and D1(+)lymphadenectomy in gastric SRCC.

A total of 358 cases whohad a gastrectomy performed forthe diagnosis of gastric cancer between 2013 and 2019 in Ankara University Medical Faculty, Surgical Oncology Department were retrospectively investigated. In all, 128 of the cases had SRCC in the final pathology. We separated the cases into two types,D1 lymphadenectomy and D1(+) lymphadenectomy. The 5-year survival, early mortality, hospital mortality and postoperative complication rates were evaluated.

There were 59 patients in the D1 group and 64 patients in the D1(+) group.Metastatic lymph node amount and therefore N stage was found to be significantly higher in the D1(+) group (p=0.00 and p=0.03, respectively). Postoperative chyle fistula was found to be significantly higher in the D1(+) group (p=0.003). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard tomean survival (p=0.065);the 5-year mean survival was 21% in the D1 group and 7% in the D1(+) group. Present findings suggest that extended lymphadenectomy does not provide a benefit in cases of SRCC.

Prognosis and Biological Behavior of Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma Better or Worse: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical pathology of gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRC) is still unclear. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the difference in biological behavior and prognosis between SRC and non-signet ring cell carcinoma (NSRC).

METHODS

A total of 58 eligible studies were analyzed using RevMan and other auxiliary software. Biological behaviors were compared based on odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD). Hazards ratio (HR) was calculated for prognosis based on Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Totally, 28,946 SRC patients were compared with 81,917 NSRC patients. Compared with NSRC patients, lower male: female ratio (OR = 0.53, P < 0.01), younger age (MD = -4.89, P < 0.01), more middle location (OR = 1.64, P < 0.01), more depressed type at early stage (OR = 1.31, P < 0.05), higher incidence of Borrmann type IV (OR = 1.96, P < 0.01), less lymph node metastasis at early stage (OR = 0.78, P < 0.05), better prognosis at early stage (HR = 0.59, P < 0.01), and worse prognosis at advanced stage (HR = 1.19, P < 0.01) were associated with SRC patients.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of SRC at early stage is better than other types of gastric cancer, while that of SRC at advanced stage is relatively poorer.

Optimal care and survival for signet-ring cell and non-signet-ring cell gastric cancer are more achievable at academic cancer centers

BACKGROUND

Western literature lacks large-scale population studies comparing the influence of academic and high-volume (HV) versus low-volume (LV) cancer centers on gastric cancer oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016 was used.

RESULTS

22871 patients were studied. Patients with stage III signet-ring cell gastric carcinoma (SRGC) received neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) more frequently at academic and HV comprehensive cancer centers (OR: 4.27 and 2.42; p < 0.0001 and 0.009) compared to community centers. Patients with stage III non-SRGC (NSRGC) had a 2.4 times higher odds of receiving NAT at academic centers. The R1 resection rate for NSRGC was lower at academic centers (OR: 0.67; p = 0.0018). Lymph node harvest ≥15 nodes was 1.6 and 1.9 times higher at academic centers for NSRGC and SRGC, respectively. Patients treated at academic centers had a significantly improved overall survival (OS).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment at academic centers is associated with significant improvements in oncologic metrics and OS.

Partial Gastrectomy is Associated with Improved Overall Survival in Signet-Ring Cell Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Signet-ring cell gastric cancer (SRGC) is a histological variant of gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) with a worse prognosis compared to non-signet-ring cell gastric cancer (NSRGC). To our knowledge, the overall survival (OS) among patients with SRGC undergoing total/near-total (TG) versus partial gastrectomy (PG) has never been reported from a large-scale Western database.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with both SRGC and NSRGC using The National Cancer Database.

RESULTS

In total, 17,086 patients were included. Patients who underwent TG versus PG were 25.5% (n = 770) versus 74.5% (n = 2246) for SRGC, and 20.9% (n = 2943) versus 79.1% (n = 11,127) for NSRGC, respectively. Patients who had SRGC were more likely to undergo TG (25.5% versus 20.9% P< 0.0001). Patients with distal gastric tumors were less likely to undergo TG (16.5% versus 25.4% P < 0.0001). Patients undergoing PG for the SRGC histological variant had better OS (HR = 0.68, CI=0.61-0.76; P < 0.0001) versus those who underwent TG. Similarly, NSRGC patients undergoing PG also had improved OS, but to a lesser extent (HR = 0.91, CI = 0.85-0.96; P= 0.002). Overall, PG for GAC was associated with improved OS compared to TG, although the OS benefit is more profound in the SRGC histological variant (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that TG is not associated with improved OS in patients who undergo gastrectomy for GAC, even when adjusted for tumor location. The survival differences are more pronounced in the SRGC histology variant. The worst survival is observed in patients with SRGC who undergo TG after adjusting for different covariates.

Difference Between Signet Ring Cell Gastric Cancers and Non-Signet Ring Cell Gastric Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: There is controversy about the characteristics and prognostic implications of signet ring cell gastric cancers and non-signet ring cell gastric cancers.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) and non-signet ring cell carcinoma (NSRCC) of stomach.

Methods: Studies compared between SRCC and NSRCC of the stomach after gastrectomy and published before September 1st, 2020, in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases, were identified systematically.

Results: A total of 2,865 studies were screened, and 36 studies were included, with 19,174 patients in the SRCC group and 55,942 patients in the NSRCC group. SRCC patients were younger in age (P < 0.001), less likely to be male patients (P < 0.001), more afflicted with upper third lesions (P < 0.001), and presenting with more Borrmann type IV tumors (P = 0.005) than NSRCC patients. Lymph nodes metastasis was similar between SRCC and NSRCC patients with advanced tumor stage (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.671.10, P = 0.23), but lower in the SRCC than NSRCC patients with early tumor stage (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.560.98, P = 0.02). SRCC patients had comparable survival outcomes with NSRCC patients for early gastric cancers (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.651.68, P < 0.001) but had significantly poor prognosis for patients with advanced tumor stage (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.281.76, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Signet ring cell carcinomas of the stomach are an increasingly common histopathological subtype of gastric cancers. These kinds of patients tend to be younger in age and more often female. Although, signet ring cell gastric cancer is a negative prognostic factor for patients with advanced stage. The difference is that for early stage of signet ring cell gastric cancers, it has low lymph nodes metastasis rate and comparable prognosis with non-signet ring cell cancers.

Treatment at an Academic Cancer Center Confers Better Survival by Stage for Signet-Ring Cell and Non-signet-Ring Cell Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

The literature lacks large-scale population studies comparing survival outcomes between signet-ring cell gastric carcinoma (SRGC) and non-SRGC (NSRGC) when treatment is delivered at academic versus community cancer centers.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2016 was queried to examine the association between treatment facility category and overall survival of patients who underwent gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC).

RESULTS

The study investigated 22,871 patients. Upstaging of resectable GAC to pathologic stage 4 was more evident at community centers (3.5%) than at academic centers (2.8%) for the NSRGC variant (p = 0.211), whereas it was comparable between the two facility categories for the SRGC variant (5.9% vs 6%, respectively). Patients with pathologic stage 1 or 3 NSRGC who underwent gastrectomy at academic programs had better overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; p < 0.0001) than those who underwent gastrectomy at community centers (HR, 0.79; p < 0.0065). Similarly, patients with stage 2 SRGC had better OS when treated at academic versus community centers (HR, 0.54; p = 0.0019). No statistically significant improvement in OS was observed between patients with stage 2 NSRGC (HR, 0.84; p = 0.083) and those with stage 3 SRGC (HR, 0.78; p = 0.054) who were treated at academic centers. No survival benefit was demonstrated for stage 1 SRGC when academic and community centers were compared (p = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study based on a large-scale database in the Western population that addressed the overall survival-by-stage of two distinct GAC histologic variants. Treatment at academic centers was associated with significant improvements in OS.

Operable gastric adenocarcinoma with different histological subtypes: Cancer-specific survival in the United States

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC), a subtype of adenocarcinoma, has been considered a histological type with poor survival. We aimed to compare the survival outcomes between patients with GSRC and patients with gastric non-signet ring cell adenocarcinoma (NGSRC) and constructed a nomogram to predict gastric adenocarcinoma-specific survival (GCSS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 10,031 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database and stratified them into two histological type groups: GSRC and NGSRC. We used propensity score matching and identified 4304 patients (training cohort) to assess the effect of the histological type on GCSS with Kaplan-Meier curves, and constructed a predictive nomogram. The accuracy of the nomogram was tested on the remaining 5727 patients (validation cohort) with concordance index (C-index) values, calibration curves, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

We found that the histological type SRC was not associated with significantly poor survival (5-year survival rate: 46.1% vs 46.7%, P = 0.822). GSRC patients had similar GCSS rates compared to those with NGSRC in each tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) stage (allP > 0.05). The nomogram showed that histological type was a relatively weak predictor of survival. The C-index value of the nomogram for predicting survival was 0.720, similar to that in the validation cohort (0.724).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with GSRC had a similar prognosis to those with NGSRC. The proposed nomogram allowed a relatively accurate survival prediction for operable GA patients after gastrectomy.

Chemoradiotherapy Is Inferior to Chemotherapy Alone in Adjuvant Setting for Signet Ring Cell Containing Gastric Cancer

Background

Signet ring cell containing gastric cancer (SRCGC) is a rare subtype of gastric cancer, and its adjuvant therapy is based on general gastric cancer. However, the effectiveness of radiotherapy for those SRCGC patients remains unknown.

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to analyze whether the addition of radiotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) can benefit survival in resected SRCGC patients.

Methods

Patients with SRCGC, who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT), were retrospectively collected. According to the proportion of signet ring cells, patients were histologically classified as pure SRCGC (pSRCGC) containing 100% of signet ring cells, mixed SRCGC (mSRCGC) containing >50% of signet ring cells, and contaminated SRCGC (cSRCGC) containing <50% of signet ring cells. Among the 272 patients, 156 were treated by CT alone and 116 by CRT. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival rate (3-year OS rate).

Results

With a median follow-up of 80.5 months, the 3-year OS rate was significantly higher in the CT group (70.5% vs. 58.6%, HR = 0.633, P = 0.017) compared with CRT group. Three independent characteristics were predictive of a poor overall survival: CRT treatment (P = 0.019), tumor size ≥5 cm (P < 0.001), and the presence of vessel invasion (P = 0.009). Subgroup analyses showed CRT significantly impaired prognosis in SRCGC patients in the cSRCGC subset, as well as lesions located in lower-middle sites, subtotal gastrectomy, male, <60 year, and no vessel invasion. Peritoneal was the most common recurrence site in SRCGC patients. The adverse events leukopenia and neutropenia were more common in the CRT group (P = 0.007).

Conclusions

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with poor survival compared with adjuvant chemotherapy in SRCGC patients with D2 gastrectomy.

Prognostic analysis of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study and competing risk analysis

Background: Limited evidence and contradictory results have been reported regarding the impact of signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) and mucinous gastric cancer (MGC) classifications on the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC).

Results: Information on 6017 patients and 266 patients was extracted from the SEER database and our hospital records, respectively. We found that patients with MGC had a better survival rate than those with SRC (P=0.012), but in the early stage, MGC was a risk factor for a poor prognosis. After PSM, for both patients from the SEER database and our hospital, the prognosis of patients with SRC was poorer than that of patients with MGC (P<0.05), but patients with MGC in early-stage GC showed poorer survival. Additionally, SRC was demonstrated to be a risk factor in the multivariate competing risk regression model for cancer-specific survival.

Conclusion: Patients with SRC may have a worse prognosis than those with MGC, but for early-stage GC, patients with SRC have a better prognosis than those with MGC.

Method: Patients from the SEER database and from our hospital diagnosed with SRC or MGC were included in a Cox regression analysis, multivariate competing risk model and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

Signet ring gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas: characteristics and prognostic implications

Controversy exists as to the relevance of the signet ring carcinoma (SRC) histological subtype of esophagogastric adenocarcinoma to long-term prognosis, with some studies reporting a worsened oncological outcome and others no clinically relevant impact. A retrospective analysis of outcomes of patients who underwent surgery with curative intent in two high-volume centers (2000-2015) was undertaken. Tumors were analyzed according to location (esophageal, junctional or gastric). Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to match patients with signet ring histology to those without (195 SRC vs. 573 non-SRC), based on age, tumor location, use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy and pathological stage. A total of 2,500 patients with esophagogastric adenocarcinomas were treated, of whom 198 (7.9%) had signet ring histology. Signet ring tumors were more likely to have positive lymph nodes at pathological analysis (59% vs. 50%, P = 0.009). The 5-year survival rate for patients with early signet ring tumors (Stage 0/I/IIa) was 65% versus 85% for other early cancers (P < 0.003). Patients with esophageal signet ring tumors had a particularly poor prognosis with 23% 2-year survival and none alive at 5 years. With PSM, overall survival (OS) was significantly poorer in the signet ring group (44.3 ± 8.6 vs. 59.8 ± 8.5 months, 5-year OS 41% vs. 50%, P = 0.027). Signet ring cells within esophagogastric adenocarcinoma are associated with a poorer prognosis. Genomic studies to identify the composition of such tumors as well as identify strategies to improve treatment for this subtype are warranted.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis in gastric cancer: Are Hispanics at higher risk?

BACKGROUND

A recent study from our group identified Hispanic race/ethnicity as an independent predictor of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) in gastric cancer. We sought to identify the tumor factors that might contribute to this strong association in Hispanics.

METHODS

California Cancer Registry data were used to identify patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2014. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine odds ratios for cancer stage, tumor location, grade, histology, and PC.

RESULTS

Of 16,275 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who met inclusion criteria, 6463 (39.7%) were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 4953 (30.4%) were Hispanic, 1020 (6.3%) were non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and 3915 (23.6%) were Asian/other. Compared to NHW, Hispanics were more likely to have a poorly differentiated grade (65.9% vs. 57.6%; p < .001), signet ring adenocarcinoma (28.1% vs. 17.6%; p < .001) and stage IV (51.9% vs. 45.0%; p < .001) gastric cancer. The proportion of stage IV patients with PC was also significantly higher in Hispanics compared to NHW, NHB, and Asian/other (28.5% vs. 16.6%, 20.5%, and 25.2%, respectively; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanic ethnicity is an independent predictor of aggressive tumor phenotype and PC. Disproportionate incidence of signet ring adenocarcinoma and PC highlight the need to explore the genomic differences in Hispanic gastric cancer.

Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: Current Management and Future Challenges

Recent advances in the epidemiology, pathology, molecular mechanisms, and combined modality therapy (CMT) fields have shown that gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC) should be considered a distinct cancerous entity. Clinical management of this cancer is challenging, with chemoradioresistance and poor outcomes in advanced stages. Pathological and molecular sets of GSRC demonstrate different features of poor cohesion and differentiation according to the WHO, Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, and Laurén classifications. These features also result in poor response to adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Certain studies of GSRC showed the disputed effectiveness of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Our aim was to discuss how an improved understanding of these therapeutic benefits may provide better treatment selection for patients, and therefore improve survival. The challenges in the new understanding of GSRC in routine practice and pathology, and the current limitations of treatment will also be discussed.

The Clinicopathological Characteristics And Genetic Alterations of Signet-ring Cell Carcinoma in Gastric Cancer

Signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRC) in advanced gastric cancer (GC) is often associated with more invasiveness and a worse prognosis than other cell types. The genetic alterations associated with gastric carcinogenesis in SRC are still unclear. In this study, 441 GC patients receiving curative surgery for GC between 2005 and 2013 were enrolled. The clinicopathological characteristics and genetic alterations of GC patients with and without SRC were compared. Among the 441 GC patients, 181 had SRC. For early GC, patients with SRC had more tumors located in the middle and lower stomach, more infiltrating tumors and better overall survival (OS) rates than those without SRC. For advanced GC, patients with SRC had more scirrhous type tumors, more PIK3CA amplifications, fewer microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, more peritoneal recurrences and worse 5-year OS rates than those without SRC. For advanced GC with SRC, patients with peritoneal recurrence tended to have PD-L1 expression. For advanced GC without SRC, patients with liver metastasis tended to have PD-L1 expression, PI3K/AKT pathway mutations, TP53 mutations and MSI-H tumors. For advanced GC, PD-L1 expression was associated with peritoneal recurrence in SRC tumors, while non-SRC tumors with liver metastasis were likely to have PI3K/AKT pathway mutations, TP53 mutations and PD-L1 expression; immunotherapy and targeted therapy may be beneficial for these patients.

Different prognostic significance of signet ring cell histology for early and advanced gastric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review relevant studies and perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of signet ring cell (SRC) histology for gastric cancer (GC) patients.

METHODS

Systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase databases. The relevant data were extracted and the association between SRC histology and survival outcome were evaluated using a fixed-effect or random-effect model.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The prevalence of SRC histology varied from 8.7% to 50%. SRC histology type was associated with poorer OS (HR: 1.12, 95%CI: 1.01-1.23, P = 0.034; I² = 85.1%) and DFS (HR: 1.17, 95%CI: 1.00-1.37, P = 0.040; I² = 63.6%). The subgroup analysis indicated that SRC type had a better OS than non-SRC type for early GC patients (HR: 0.60, 95%CI: 0.48-0.75, P < 0.001; I² = 33.7%). However, it was a poor prognostic factor for advanced GC when excluding stage IV patients (HR: 1.18, 95%CI: 1.07-1.29, P < 0.001; I² = 6.5%). SRC type had a higher risk of peritoneal recurrence than non-SRC type (OR: 1.36, 95%CI: 1.06-1.75, P = 0.017; I² = 1.3%).

CONCLUSION

SRC type had a distinctly different prognostic significance for early and advanced GC patients. SRC type was associated with better survival outcomes in early GC patients, but it was a predictive factor for poor survival in advanced GC patients.

From biology to surgery: One step beyond histology for tailored surgical treatments of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer related death. Although its incidence is globally declined, prognosis remains dismal in the Western hemisphere, while better outcomes are evidenced in Asian countries. Endoscopic or surgical resection with or without lymphadenectomy represents the only chance of cure, with limited improvements of the prognosis in case of associated chemotherapy in a neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. This could be mainly attributed to the uniform fashion of treatment of gastric cancer, mainly based on the histological features, that usually do not reflect the complexity of the disease. With the recent introduction of genomic technologies and new generation sequencing techniques, gastric cancer biology is now investigated in great details. This has brought to the publication of three main molecular classifications, based on the underlying molecular biology of gastric cancer. Although only few clinical reports are currently present in literature, the identification of gastric cancer molecular subtypes has shown interesting findings that may pave the way to a tailored clinical and surgical management. The aim of this review is, thus, to give a comprehensive overview of the current molecular classifications as compared to the available histopathological ones, also focusing on the potential clinical and surgical benefits and the future perspectives for a more personalized treatment of gastric cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

The benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach is controversial.

AIM

To evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study identified patients with locally advanced signet-ring cell carcinomas of the stomach (cT3/4 and cN any) diagnosed from January 2012 to December 2017 by using the clinical Tumor-Node-Metastasis (cTNM) staging system. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce bias in patient selection. The histologic and prognostic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assessed. The overall survival rates were used as the outcome measure to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs surgery-first treatment in the selected patients.

RESULTS

Of the 144 patients eligible for this study, 36 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 108 received initial surgery after diagnosis. After adjustment by PSM, 36 pairs of patients were generated, and baseline characteristics, including age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor location, and cTNM stage, were similar between the two groups. The R0 resection rates were 88.9% and 86.1% in the surgery-first and neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups after PSM, respectively (P = 1.000). The median follow-up period was 46.4 mo. The 5-year overall survival rates of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and surgery-first group were 50.0% and 65.0% (P = 0.235), respectively, before PSM and 50% and 64.7% (P = 0.192), respectively, after PSM. Multivariate analyses conducted before and after PSM showed that NAC was not a prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides no survival benefit in patients with locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma. For resectable gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma, upfront surgery should be the primary therapy.

Clinicopathological Evaluation of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: Our Experience

Aim

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. In Turkey, stomach cancer is ranked 5th among men and 8th among women in all cancers and is located in the forefront in cancer-related deaths. Signet ring cell adenocarcinoma, which is the histopathological subtype of gastric cancer, has a poor prognosis. The incidence of signet ring cell adenocarcinoma is rising. In the present study, we aimed to describe the clinicopathologic features of signet ring cell adenocarcinoma.

Materials and Methods

A total of 79 patients with 30 being female (38%) and 49 male (62%) who were diagnosed with gastric signet ring cell adenocarcinoma in the Medical Oncology Department of Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital between January 2004 and October 2015 were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

The baseline demographic characteristics of the patients, such as tumor localization, tumor stage, preoperative serum tumor markers, and treatment type (surgery and chemotherapy regimen), and the effects of these variables on survival and mortality were evaluated. Total surgery, stage III disease, moderate to poor grade, preoperative serum CA 19-9 and CEA levels were found as independent predictors of progression risk (p < 0.05). Each 1 ng/mL increase in preoperative serum CEA level was found to increase the risk of progression by 1.20 folds. Again, each 1 U/mL in preoperative serum CA 19-9 level was found to increase the risk of progression and mortality by 1.06 folds.

Conclusion

The clinicopathologic features of signet ring cell stomach cancer were described. Tumor localization and disease, CA 19-9 and CEA levels, and treatment type (surgery and chemotherapy regimen) were effective on survival and mortality. However, further studies with larger patient groups are needed on this issue.

How to cite this article

Altay SB, Akkurt G, Yılmaz N, et al. Clinicopathological Evaluation of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: Our Experience. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2020;10(2):76–84.

Mucin expression in gastric- and gastro-oesophageal signet-ring cell cancer: results from a comprehensive literature review and a large cohort study of Caucasian and Asian gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The literature on the prognostic relevance of signet-ring cell (SRC) histology in gastric cancer (GC) is controversial which is most likely related to inconsistent SRC classification based on haematoxylin-eosin staining. We hypothesised that mucin stains can consistently identify SRC-GC and predict GC patient outcome.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature review on mucin stains in SRC-GC and characterised the mucin expression in 851 Caucasian GC and 410 Asian GC using Alcian Blue (AB)-Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS), MUC2 (intestinal-type mucin), and MUC5AC (gastric-type mucin). The relationship between mucin expression and histological phenotype [poorly cohesive (PC) including proportion of SRCs, non-poorly cohesive (non-PC), or mucinous (MC)], clinicopathological variables, and patient outcome was analysed.

RESULTS

Depending on mucin expression and cut-offs, the positivity rates of SRC-GC reported in the literature varied from 6 to 100%. Patients with MUC2 positive SRC-GC or SRC-GC with (gastro)intestinal phenotype had poorest outcome. In our cohort study, PC with ≥ 10% SRCs expressed more frequently MUC2, MUC5AC, and ABPAS (p < 0.001, p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). Caucasians with AB positive GC or combined ABPAS-MUC2 positive and MUC5AC negative had poorest outcome (all p = 0.002). This association was not seen in Asian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to suggest that mucin stains do not help to differentiate between SRC-GC and non-SRC-GC. However, mucin stains appear to be able to identify GC patients with different outcome. To our surprise, the relationship between outcome and mucin expression seems to differ between Caucasian and Asian GC patients which warrants further investigations.

Development and validation of prognostic nomogram based on log odds of positive lymph nodes for patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma

Objective

Our aims were to establish novel nomogram models, which directly targeted patients with signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC), for individualized prediction of overall survival (OS) rate and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Methods

We selected 1,365 SRC patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, and then randomly partitioned them into a training cohort and a validation cohort. Independent predicted indicators, which were identified by using univariate testing and multivariate analyses, were used to construct our prognostic nomogram models. Three methods, Harrell concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and calibration curve, were used to assess the ability of discrimination and predictive accuracy. Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), net reclassification improvement (NRI) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess clinical utility of our nomogram models.

Results

Six independent predicted indicators, age, race, log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), T stage, M stage and tumor size, were associated with OS rate. Nevertheless, only five independent predicted indicators were associated with CSS except race. The developed nomograms based on those independent predicted factors showed reliable discrimination. C-index of our nomogram for OS and CSS was 0.760 and 0.763, which were higher than American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system (0.734 and 0.741, respectively). C-index of validation cohort for OS was 0.757 and for CSS was 0.773. The calibration curves also performed good consistency. IDI, NRI and DCA showed the nomograms for both OS and CSS had a comparable clinical utility than the TNM staging system.

Conclusions

The novel nomogram models based on LODDS provided satisfying predictive ability of SRC both in OS and CSS than AJCC 8th edition TNM staging system alone.

Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Analysis of Patients With Signet Ring Cell Gastric Carcinoma

We do not know the clinical and prognostic factors that influence the survival of patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC). Therefore, a retrospective review was undertaken of 219 patients with SRC who had undergone gastrectomy between January 2009 and December 2012 in our hospital. Patient age, sex, TNM stage, vessel carcinoma embolus, perineural invasion, tumor site and operation type, postoperative chemotherapy, and five-year overall survival were recorded and evaluated. In our study, 93 cases (42.5%) were signet ring cell carcinoma only, and 126 cases (57.5%) were signet ring cell carcinoma coexisting with other components (such as adenocarcinoma or mucus adenocarcinoma). Eighty-three patients were female, 136 were male, 46 occurred at the gastroesophageal junction (21.0%), 63 at the fundus/body (28.8%), 80 were antrum/pylorus (36.5%), and 30 were whole stomach (13.7%). The prognosis of gastric antrum/ pylorus cancer was the best (P < 0.05). There were 133 patients (60.7%) with stage III, and the single factor analysis showed that the earlier the stage, the better the prognosis. The overall five-year survival rate was 30.1% in all patients. One-hundred and 41 patients (64.4%) received D2 radical surgery, 64 (29.2%) received D1 radical operation, and 14 (6.4%) received palliative resection, and the patients who received D2 had the best overall survival (P < 0.05). The survival time of the paclitaxel-based regimen in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy tended to be prolonged. There was no statistical difference in overall survival between the percentage of signet-ring cells and sex. In summary, age, tumor stage, and surgical resection combined with D2 lymphadenectomy were independent prognostic factors for SRC. Adjuvant chemotherapy with a paclitaxel-based regimen may improve the survival of patients with SRC.

Postoperative Radiotherapy Improves Survival in Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma: a SEER Database Analysis

PURPOSE

To identify the potential therapeutic role of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced (stage II and stage III) gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced gastric SRC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database between 2004 and 2012 were included in our study. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional models were performed, and survival curves were generated to evaluate the prognostic effect of postoperative RT and surgery alone on SRC patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to avoid selection bias among the study cohorts.

RESULTS

We found that patients with postoperative RT had better probability of survival compared with those who did not receive RT (overall survival [OS], P<0.001; cancer-specific survival [CSS], P<0.001). After PSM, analysis of both overall and CSS showed that patients who underwent postoperative RT had better prognosis than those receiving surgery alone in the matched cohort (OS, P=0.00079; CSS, P=0.0036). Multivariate Cox proportional model indicated that postoperative RT had better effect on prognosis compared with surgery alone with respect to both overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.716; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.590-0.87; P=0.001) and CSS (HR, 0.713; 95% CI, 0.570-0.890; P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative RT had better prognosis compared with surgery alone for both overall and CSS for patients with locally advanced gastric SRC.

High Proportion of Potential Candidates for Immunotherapy in a Chilean Cohort of Gastric Cancer Patients: Results of the FORCE1 Study

Gastric cancer (GC) is a heterogeneous disease. This heterogeneity applies not only to morphological and phenotypic features but also to geographical variations in incidence and mortality rates. As Chile has one of the highest mortality rates within South America, we sought to define a molecular profile of Chilean GCs (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03158571/(FORCE1)). Solid tumor samples and clinical data were obtained from 224 patients, with subsets analyzed by tissue microarray (TMA; n = 90) and next generation sequencing (NGS; n = 101). Most demographic and clinical data were in line with previous reports. TMA data indicated that 60% of patients displayed potentially actionable alterations. Furthermore, 20.5% were categorized as having a high tumor mutational burden, and 13% possessed micro-satellite instability (MSI). Results also confirmed previous studies reporting high Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity (13%) in Chilean-derived GC samples suggesting a high proportion of patients could benefit from immunotherapy. As expected, TP53 and PIK3CA were the most frequently altered genes. However, NGS demonstrated the presence of TP53, NRAS, and BRAF variants previously unreported in current GC databases. Finally, using the Kendall method, we report a significant correlation between EBV+ status and programmed death ligand-1 (PDL1)+ and an inverse correlation between p53 mutational status and MSI. Our results suggest that in this Chilean cohort, a high proportion of patients are potential candidates for immunotherapy treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first in South America to assess the prevalence of actionable targets and to examine a molecular profile of GC patients.

Differential gene expression in growth factors, epithelial mesenchymal transition and chemotaxis in the diffuse type compared with the intestinal type of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly heterogeneous disease and one of the major causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Diffuse-type gastric adenocarcinoma (or poorly cohesive- with independent cells) is characterized by aggressive behavior (rapid invasion, chemoresistance and peritoneal metastasis), as compared with intestinal-subtype adenocarcinoma. Diffuse subtype GC additionally has a substantially increasing incidence rate in Europe and the USA, and was often associated with younger age. Our objective was to analyze the expression and clinical significance of genes involved in several signaling pathways in diffuse-type GC. Tumors samples and non-malignant gastric tissues were obtained from patients with GC (diffuse-type and intestinal-subtype adenocarcinoma). The expression of 33 genes coding for proteins involved in four categories, growth factors and receptors, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cell proliferation and migration, and angiogenesis was determined by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The expression of 22 genes was significantly upregulated in diffuse-type GC and two were downregulated (including CDH1) compared with normal tissues. Among these genes, acompared with intestinal-subtype adenocarcinoma, diffuse-type GC revealed elevated levels of IGF1 and IGF1R, FGF7 and FGFR1, ZEB2, CXCR4, CXCL12 and RHOA, and decreased levels of CDH1, MMP9 and MKI67. The expression of selected genes was compared with other genes and according to clinical parameters. Furthermore, TGF-β expression was significantly increased in linitis, a sub-population of diffusely infiltrating type associated with extensive fibrosis and tumor invasion. Our study identified new target genes (IGF1, FGF7, CXCR4, TG-β and ZEB2) whose expression is associated with aggressive phenotype of diffuse-type GC.

State of the art for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: from classification, prognosis, and genomic characteristics to specified treatments

Gastric cancer (GC) is responsible for 9% of cancer deaths worldwide. Over 950,000 new cases are diagnosed each year, and about 90% of them are in advanced stage, requiring chemotherapy. In Europe there has been research based on pre- and postoperative chemotherapy treatment, using 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cisplatin, capecitabine, and docetaxel. Chemotherapy significantly impairs the quality of life of patients; however, the final effects are not always satisfactory. There is scientific evidence that gastric mucus tumors and signet ring cell carcinomas have a pattern of specific signatures, that distinguish them from other gastric cancer subtypes, and may be associated with a poor response to systematic treatment. Signet ring cell carcinoma is less chemosensitive than others, and the increase in the percentage of signet ring cells correlates with resistance to chemotherapy. Perioperative chemotherapy in advanced signet ring cell carcinomas is an independent factor of poor prognosis and survival, which is explained by the toxicity of neoadjuvant treatment. Therefore, curative surgical resection enhanced by standardized lymphadenectomy remains the recommended gold standard in GC therapy. According to presented studies, early detection and aggressive treatments for this subtype of GC is a reasonable approach. This review paper is mostly addressed to physicians who are interested in updating to the state of the art concerning different subtypes of gastric carcinoma.

Clinicopathological differences in signet ring cell adenocarcinoma between early and advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Signet ring cell adenocarcinoma is a histological classification based on the WHO classification. The presence of this specific histological type is associated with a worse pathological appearance. The prognosis of signet ring cell adenocarcinoma in gastric cancer patients after curative surgery is still under debate.

METHODS

From January 1988 to December 2012, a total of 2971 patients, including 819 early and 2152 advanced gastric cancer patients underwent curative resection for gastric cancer. Among them, there were 185 cases of signet ring cell adenocarcinoma in early gastric cancer patients, while there were 570 cases in advanced gastric cancer patients.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of signet ring cell adenocarcinoma was 25.4%. Our results showed that the 5-year overall survival rates of early gastric cancer patients with signet ring cell adenocarcinoma and non-signet ring cell adenocarcinoma were 90.7 and 83.2%, respectively (P = 0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival rates of early gastric cancer patients with signet ring cell adenocarcinoma and non-signet ring cell adenocarcinoma were 87.4 and 81.6%, respectively (P = 0.003). The 5-year overall survival rates of advanced gastric cancer patients with signet ring cell adenocarcinoma and non-signet ring cell adenocarcinoma were 32.1 and 37.9%, respectively (P = 0.041). The 5-year disease-free survival rates of advanced gastric cancer patients with signet ring cell adenocarcinoma and non-signet ring cell adenocarcinoma were 28.6 and 35.2%, respectively (P = 0.037). Signet ring cell adenocarcinoma was an independent predictor for overall survival in advanced gastric cancer (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

The clinical features and prognosis of signet ring cell adenocarcinoma are different between early and advanced gastric cancer. Signet ring cell adenocarcinoma is a poor prognostic factor in advanced gastric cancer after curative resection.

Expression of cell adhesion molecule 1 in gastric neck and base glandular cells: Possible involvement in peritoneal dissemination of signet ring cells

AIMS

To determine cellular distribution of cell adhesion molecule 1 (CADM1), an immunoglobulin superfamily member, in the human oxyntic gastric mucosa, and to explore possible involvement in the development and peritoneal dissemination of signet ring cell (SRC) gastric carcinoma, which often develops in the oxyntic mucosa.

MAIN METHODS

Immunohistochemistry and double immunofluorescence were conducted on surgical specimens of normal and SRC-bearing stomachs and peritoneal metastatic foci of SRCs. KATO-III (lacking CADM1) and HSC-43 (expressing CADM1) SRC cell lines were cocultured on a Met-5A mesothelial or TIG-1 fibroblastic cell monolayer.

KEY FINDINGS

In the oxyntic gland, some neck and nearly all base glandular cells were CADM1-positive, and mucin 5AC-positive cells were CADM1-negative, while some mucin 6-positive neck cells were CADM1-positive. Foveolar-epithelial, parietal, and endocrine cells were CADM1-negative. CADM1 was negative in all SRC carcinomas that were confined within the submucosa (n = 11) and all but one of those invading deeper (n = 15). In contrast, peritoneal metastatic foci of SRCs were CADM1-positive in five out of eleven cases (P < 0.01). In the cocultures, exogenous CADM1 made KATO-III cells adhere more and grow faster on a Met-5A monolayer, not on TIG-1 monolayers. HSC-43 cells adhered more and grew faster on Met-5A than on TIG-1 monolayers, which were partly counteracted by a function-neutralizing anti-CADM1 antibody.

SIGNIFICANCE

Nearly all chief cells and a part of mucous neck cells express CADM1. SRC gastric carcinoma appears to emerge as a CADM1-negative tumor, but CADM1 may help SRCs develop peritoneal dissemination through promoting their adhesion and growth in the serosal tissue.

Establishment and Characterization of gc-006-03, a Novel Human Signet Ring Cell Gastric Cancer Cell Line Derived from Metastatic Ascites

Signet ring cell gastric cancer (SRCGC) is a special type of gastric cancer with rapid progression and poor prognosis. However, few available SRCGC cell lines from Chinese patients can be used for research, the molecular mechanism of its growth and metastasis is still incompletely understood. In this study, we established and characterized a novel SRCGC cell line, gc-006-03.The cells showed a tendency to pile up without contact inhibition. G-band karyotypes of gc-006-03 were revealed hypotriploid with a modal chromosome number of 51. Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that the cells were positive for CEA, CK7, CDX2 and Ki-67(45%), and negative for CK20, TTF1and Li-cadherin. Flow cytometry analysis showed that gc-006-3 had 25% of CD44⁺ cells. The cells possessed strong clonality and high plating efficiency, and the doubling time was 36h. The cells grew vigorously for more than 100 passages in serial culture. Meanwhile, the cells showed a high rate of tumor formation. Tumors were observed in all of the nude mice (5/5) given injections of the cells. The metastatic capability of the cell line was found in zebrafish injected the cells. The results of whole genome sequencing revealed the unique genomic characteristics of gc-006-03. In summary, this new stable cell line may be useful in basic and clinical research on gastric signet ring cell carcinoma.

Incidence, Survival, and Predictors of Lymph Node Involvement in Early-Stage Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma in the US

INTRODUCTION

The incidence, survival, and propensity for nodal metastasis in early-stage gastric signet ring cell carcinoma have not been defined in the United States. These data are critical determinants for treatment allocation.

METHODS

Cases of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma were extracted from the national SEER database for the years 2004-2013. Age-standardized incidence was derived. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of nodal metastasis. Exclusion criteria included neoadjuvant radiotherapy and lack of histologic or nodal data.

RESULTS

A total of 10,624 cases were initially identified. The analysis cohort included 506 cases with early T-stage N0M0 disease following exclusions. The incidence was 0.094 per 100,000 person-years. The 5-year survival rate was 82.8%. Tumor stage (p < 0.001) and size (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of nodal metastasis. The incidence of nodal involvement for T1a tumors <2 cm was 5.4% (p < 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of potentially resectable signet ring gastric carcinoma has not changed significantly over the past decade. While presenting with predominantly high-grade histology, early T-stage disease has a high survival rate. Small T1a tumors have low rates of nodal metastasis, suggesting that an endoscopic resection could be considered in this subset.

Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and computed tomography findings between signet ring cell carcinoma and nonsignet ring cell carcinoma in early and advanced gastric cancer

Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) of the stomach is a histological type based on microscopic characteristics. SRC's clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis are still controversial. Our study is to describe the clinicopathological features and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings of patients with SRC of the stomach in comparison with nonsignet ring cell adenocarcinoma (NSRC). We retrospectively analyzed data from 241 patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy, including 62 SRC and 179 NSRC. Clinicopathological outcomes and MDCT findings were evaluated, and we investigated whether these variables were correlated with histopathological type. In early gastric carcinoma, patients with SRC were younger (50.2 vs. 60.2 years; P = 0.000) and more likely to be observed in the middle and lower third stomach (P = 0.010). Early SRC had a tendency to be confined to the mucosa (82.1%). There were significant differences in degree of enhancement between early SRC and NSRC on MDCT imaging (P < 0.001). In advanced gastric carcinoma, SRC was more likely to be stage T3‐4 (100%). SRC patients had thicker tumors (P = 0.001) and a higher frequency of diffusely infiltrative gross appearance (P < 0.001). SRC was more likely to have high‐degree contrast enhancement than were NSRC (P = 0.001). The maximal diameter of SRC tumor on MDCT imaging correlated with lymph node metastasis (sensitivity 93.9%, specificity 74.1%) and serosal invasion (sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 78.0%) of SRC. In conclusion, SRC differs significantly from NSRC in clinicopathological features at presentation. MDCT could help differentiate advanced gastric SRC from NSRC based on the thickened stomach wall, high‐degree contrast enhancement, and a higher frequency of diffusely infiltrative gross appearance, particularly in combination.

A new mutation of the CDH1 gene in a patient with an aggressive signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach

Germline mutations in CDH1, the gene coding for the E-cadherin adhesion protein, are known to cause hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. We identified a new truncating germline mutation (p.Asp538Thrfs*19) in exon 11 of the CDH1 gene in a 41-year-old male with a diffuse gastric cancer. Although he had no parental history of gastric cancer, the co-segregation study in the family detected the same mutation in his healthy 31-year-old brother. The mutation affects one of the extracellular repeat (CAD repeats) domains which is essential for the homophilic binding specificity that directs “E-cadherin” to bind with itself each others. In this case, immunohistochemical analysis showed no expression of E-cadherin in the tumor sample and was a useful prescreening tool to genetic testing. This finding was associated with a poor response to trastuzumab-based treatment.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognostic Value of Signet Ring Cells in Gastric Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Previous studies of the prognostic value of the signet ring cell (SRC) type have yielded inconsistent results. Therefore, the aim of the present meta-analysis is to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic value of SRCs.

Methods: Relevant articles that compared SRC and non-SRC type in PubMed and Web of Science were comprehensively searched. Then, a meta-analysis was performed.

Results: A total of 19 studies including 35947 cases were analyzed. Compared with non-SRC patients, SRC patients tended to be younger (WMD: -3.88, P=0.001) and predominantly female (OR: 1.60, P<0.001). Additionally, SRC patients exhibited less upper third tumor location (OR: 0.62, P<0.001) and less frequent hematogenous metastasis (OR: 0.41, P<0.001). There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between SRC and non-SRC patients in the total population (HR: 1.02, P=0.830). Early gastric cancer with SRCs was associated with better OS (HR: 0.57, P=0.002), while advanced gastric cancer with non-SRCs was associated with a worse prognosis (HR: 1.17, P<0.001).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis revealed that SRC tends to affect young females and tends to be located in the middle and lower third of the stomach. Early SRCs are associated with better prognoses, while advanced SRCs are associated with worse prognoses.

Survival predictors associated with signet ring cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SRCCE): A population-based retrospective cohort study

Purpose

Signet ring cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SRCCE) is an uncommon tumor associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is still no consensus regarding cut-off values for tumor size, age and optimal treatment for SRCCE. Thus, we elucidated the current survival outcomes of patients with SRCCE and analyzed factors associated with prognosis.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study based on the SEER (The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) program database was conducted. We identified 537 patients (461 men and 76 women) newly diagnosed with SRCCE between January 2004 and December 2014. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to measure the mortality-associated risk factors in patients with SRCCE after adjusting for various variables.

Results

The 1-, 2- and 5-year disease-specific mortalities (DSM) were 51.6%, 67.6%, and 78.4%, respectively, and the median survival time was 12.0 months. The factors correlated with mortality hazard were marital status (unmarried versus married, Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.443), tumor size (≥ 5 cm versus < 5 cm, HR = 1.444), tumor grade (high grade versus low grade, HR = 3.001), condition of primary tumor (T4 versus T1, HR = 2.178), regional lymph node metastasis (N1 versus N0, HR = 1.739), further metastasis (M1 versus M0, HR = 1.951) and chemotherapy (receiving chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy, HR = 0.464).

Conclusions

The contemporary 5-year DSM was 78.4%. Being unmarried, having a tumor size ≥ 5 cm, a high tumor grade, a score of T4 for tumor invasion of adjacent organs, a score of N1 for regional lymph node metastasis, a score of M1 for distant metastasis and no chemotherapy were independent predictors of high DSM.