Immunosuppressive therapy in experimental and clinical myocarditis

The evolving approach to paediatric myocarditis: a review of the current literature

Paediatric myocarditis remains challenging from the perspectives of diagnosis and management. Multiple aetiologies exist and the majority of cases appear to be related to viral illnesses. Enteroviruses are believed to be the most common cause, although cases related to adenovirus may be more frequent than suspected. The clinical presentation is extremely varied, ranging from asymptomatic to sudden unexpected death. A high index of suspicion is crucial. There is emerging evidence to support investigations such as serum N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide levels, as well as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as adjuncts to the clinical diagnosis. In the future, these may reduce the necessity for invasive methods, such as endomyocardial biopsy, which remain the gold standard. Management generally includes supportive care, consisting of cardiac failure medical management, with the potential for mechanical support and cardiac transplantation. Treatments aimed at immunosuppression remain controversial. The paediatric literature is extremely limited with no conclusive evidence to support or refute these strategies. This article summarises the current literature regarding aetiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of myocarditis in paediatric patients.

Myocarditis

Viruses are the most common cause of myocarditis in economically advanced countries.

Enteroviruses and adenoviruses are the most common etiologic agents.

Viral myocarditis is a triphasic process. Phase 1 is the period of active viral replication in the myocardium during which the symptoms of myocardial damage range from none to cardiogenic shock. If the disease process continues, it enters phase 2, which is characterized by autoimmunity triggered by viral and myocardial proteins. Heart failure often appears for the first time in phase 2. Phase 3, dilated cardiomyopathy, is the end result in some patients. Diagnostic procedures and treatment should be tailored to the phase of disease.

Viral myocarditis is a significant cause of dilated cardiomyopathy, as proved by the frequent presence of viral genomic material in the myocardium, and by improvement in ventricular function by immunomodulatory therapy.

Myocarditis of any etiology usually presents with heart failure, but the second most common presentation is ventricular arrhythmia. As a result, myocarditis is one of the most common causes of sudden death in young people and others without preexisting structural heart disease.

Myocarditis can be definitively diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy. However, it is clear that existing criteria for the histologic diagnosis need to be refined, and that a variety of molecular markers in the myocardium and the circulation can be used to establish the diagnosis.

Treatment of myocarditis has been generally disappointing. Accurate staging of the disease will undoubtedly improve treatment in the future. It is clear that immunosuppression and immunomodulation are effective in some patients, especially during phase 2, but may not be as useful in phases 1 and 3. Since myocarditis is often selflimited, bridging and recovery therapy with circulatory assistance may be effective. Prevention by immunization or receptor blocking strategies is under development.

Giant cell myocarditis is an unusually fulminant form of the disease that progresses rapidly to heart failure or sudden death. Rapid onset of disease in young people, especially those with other autoimmune manifestations, accompanied by heart failure or ventricular arrhythmias, suggests giant cell myocarditis.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy in economically developed countries is usually the result of myocarditis.

Diagnosis and management of pediatric myocarditis

Myocarditis is an insidious inflammatory disorder of the myocardium. As a clinical entity, it has been recognized for two centuries, but it defies traditional diagnostic tests. A greater understanding of the immune response underlying the pathobiology of the disorder can lead to a more rational therapeutic approach. The presentation, course and therapeutic options appear to be different in the pediatric compared with the adult population. An understanding of the difference between fulminant and acute progressive myocarditis has led to successful treatment strategies. A variety of new therapies are available, including antiviral agents, immunosuppression, and modulation of the biological response to inflammation. The specific question for patients with myocarditis is whether regimens designed to reduce or eliminate inflammation can provide clinical benefits compared with conventional heart failure therapy. This review highlights pathological mechanisms, modalities of diagnosis, and novel therapies which may improve outcomes.

Association of heart failure in homozygous beta-thalassemia with the major histocompatibility complex

BACKGROUND

In beta-thalassemia major, heart failure primarily affecting left ventricular systolic function is the most common complication and cause of death. Apart from iron deposition, it has been recently reported that myocarditis might be another contributing factor in the pathogenesis of acute or chronic heart failure, acting possibly through an autoimmune mechanism. In an attempt to assess the role of immunogenetic factors in the development of heart failure associated with beta-thalassemia major, we studied the frequency of major histocompatibility antigens/alleles A, B, DR, and DQ in homozygous beta-thalassemic patients with and without heart failure primarily affecting the left ventricle.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-five consecutive unrelated Greek patients with homozygous beta-thalassemia and left-sided chronic heart failure were studied. Fifty-eight unrelated Greek patients with homozygous beta-thalassemia without heart failure and 130 unrelated Greek healthy controls were also studied. In all subjects, class I HLA-A and -B typing was performed by the complement-mediated lymphocytotoxicity assay, whereas class II HLA-DR and -DQ typing was performed by polymerase chain reaction. HLA-DRB1*1401 allele frequency was significantly increased in patients with beta-thalassemia major without left-sided heart failure compared with those with heart failure (corrected P [P(c)]=0. 02, odds ratio 0.1) and healthy controls (P(c)=0.001). HLA-DQA1*0501 allele frequency was increased in patients with heart failure compared with patients without heart failure (P(c)=0.04, odds ratio 14) and healthy controls (P(c)=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences exist in the immunogenetic profile between homozygous beta-thalassemic patients with and without left-sided heart failure, raising the possibility that genetically defined immune mechanisms may play an important role in the pathogenesis of heart failure in beta-thalassemia.

Molecular approaches to enteroviral diagnosis in idiopathic cardiomyopathy and myocarditis

Enteroviruses are thought to be etiologic agents in some cases of human myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy. Murine models of acute coxsackievirus B3 myocarditis implicate coxsackie B viruses as possible causes of human myocarditis. Indirect evidence implicating enteroviruses as causative agents in human heart disease derives from serologic studies. More recently, direct evidence for enteroviral presence in diseased human heart tissues has been obtained by nucleic acid hybridization analyses. Although the data suggest that enteroviral infections may be associated with 18% to 50% of cases of myocarditis or dilated cardiomyopathy, or both, causality has not been established. Unanswered questions remain regarding the specific identity of the enteroviral genomes detected in the human heart and the potential for enteroviruses to persist in the heart.

The applicability of results of streamlined trials to clinical practice: the Myocarditis Treatment Trial

The application of the results of clinical trials to medical practice depends in part upon the understanding and acceptance of study results by the practising physician. Involving non-academic practitioners as investigators in streamlined trials is an effective means to increase enrollment and minimize cost. Streamlining data collection to accommodate the needs of the practitioner, however, decreases the amount of scientifically and clinically relevant data that are collected. More important, biased enrollment is more likely in this setting. Modifications in organization and design of the Myocarditis Treatment Trial form an example of streamlining an ongoing clinical trial to enhance enrollment.