Correlation between HbA1c, purified insulins, diabetic control, and insulin antibodies in diabetic children

The importance of anti-insulin antibody in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or multiple daily insulin injections therapy

To investigate the influence of two insulin administration modalities, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) therapy with insulin analogues, on the development of insulin antibodies (IAs) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and to assess the impact of IAs on glucose control and hypoglycaemia. 96 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated with CSII (n = 48) or MDI (n = 48) were included in the study. Age, duration of diabetes, A1c, preprandial and postprandial blood glucose and hypoglycaemic events were compared between IA positive and negative patients. IA levels were higher in the CSII group (% 24.6 ± 14.2) than the MDI group (% 13.2 ± 9.9). Duration of diabetes and age were not associated with IA positiveness. While A1c, preprandial blood glucose and the frequency of hypoglycaemic events were similar in two groups, postprandial blood glucose was lower in IA positive group (P = 0.03). Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated with CSII with insulin analogues had higher IA levels when compared to MDI therapy. However, the development of IAs did not impair the glycaemic control.

Immunological responses to exogenous insulin

Regardless of purity and origin, therapeutic insulins continue to be immunogenic in humans. However, severe immunological complications occur rarely, and less severe events affect a small minority of patients. Insulin autoantibodies (IAAs) may be detectable in insulin-naive individuals who have a high likelihood of developing type 1 diabetes or in patients who have had viral disorders, have been treated with various drugs, or have autoimmune disorders or paraneoplastic syndromes. This suggests that under certain circumstances, immune tolerance to insulin can be overcome. Factors that can lead to more or less susceptibility to humoral responses to exogenous insulin include the recipient's immune response genes, age, the presence of sufficient circulating autologous insulin, and the site of insulin delivery. Little proof exists, however, that the development of insulin antibodies (IAs) to exogenous insulin therapy affects integrated glucose control, insulin dose requirements, and incidence of hypoglycemia, or contributes to beta-cell failure or to long-term complications of diabetes. Studies in which pregnant women with diabetes were monitored for glycemic control argue against a connection between IAs and fetal risk. Although studies have shown increased levels of immune complexes in patients with diabetic microangiopathic complications, these immune complexes often do not contain insulin or IAs, and insulin administration does not contribute to their formation. The majority of studies have shown no relationship between IAs and diabetic angiopathic complications, including nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy. With the advent of novel insulin formulations and delivery systems, such as insulin pumps and inhaled insulin, examination of these issues is increasingly relevant.

The effect of insulin antibodies on the metabolic action of inhaled and subcutaneous insulin: a prospective randomized pharmacodynamic study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of the development of high- or low-affinity insulin antibodies (IABs) on postprandial glucose tolerance, duration of insulin action, and clinical safety in patients with type 1 diabetes receiving inhaled insulin (Exubera).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study consisted of a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial in which 47 patients with type 1 diabetes received NPH insulin twice daily plus either premeal inhaled insulin (INH group; n = 24) or pre-meal subcutaneous regular insulin (SC group; n = 23) for 24 weeks. Meal challenge and euglycemic clamp studies were performed on consecutive days at baseline, week 12, and week 24. Adverse events were monitored.

RESULTS

For the INH and SC groups, mean (+/-SD) IAB levels were 3.5 +/- 3.9 and 2.6 +/- 4.1 muU/ml at baseline, respectively, compared with 101.4 +/- 140.4 and 4.3 +/- 9.4 microU/ml at week 24. At week 24, the changes from baseline were similar for the INH and SC groups for maximal plasma glucose concentration (C(max)) (adjusted ratio for treatment group difference 0.99 [90% CI 0.95-1.03]), area under the plasma glucose concentration time curve (adjusted ratio for treatment group difference 0.98 [0.88-1.08]), and duration of insulin action (adjusted treatment group difference 29 min [-49 to 108]). No adverse events were attributed to IABs.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 1 diabetes treated with inhaled insulin, development of high- or low-affinity IABs did not impair postprandial glucose tolerance, alter the time-action profile of insulin, or impact tolerability. No clinical relevance of IABs was identified in this study.

Prevalence of anti-insulin antibodies and its relation to severe hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated diabetic patients

The prevalence of anti-insulin antibodies (AIABs) and their association with clinical parameters, metabolic control and severe hypoglycaemia were investigated in a geographically defined population of insulin-treated diabetic patients. Eighty per cent of the patients (479) delivered venous blood samples and answered a questionnaire on severe hypoglycaemic problems during a 12-month period. Circulating AIABs were demonstrable in 78% of the patients, being more common among those with type 1 diabetes and in long-duration patients. High levels of AIABs were also more frequent in patients in whom insulin treatment had been initiated prior to the era of highly purified insulins. The AIABs did not correlate to metabolic control, insulin dose or severe hypoglycaemia. It is concluded that AIABs is not a risk factor for severe hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated diabetic patients.

Effect of insulin antibodies and their kinetic characteristics on plasma free insulin dynamics in patients with diabetes mellitus

To determine the influence of insulin antibodies (and their equilibrium kinetic properties) on the pharmacokinetics of insulin, we examined the relationship between insulin antibody binding and the initial rate of increase, time to peak, and return to baseline of therapeutic doses of insulin injected subcutaneously (0.15 U/kg) and the half-life, distribution space, and metabolic clearance rate of intravenously infused insulin (2 mU/kg/min) in insulin-treated patients with diabetes mellitus. Compared to age-weight-matched nondiabetic subjects, the diabetic subjects had reduced initial rates of increase (0.33 +/- 0.2 v 0.44 +/- 0.03 microU/mL/min, P less than 0.05), delayed time to peak (130 +/- 12 v 86 +/- 8 min, p less than 0.02), and prolonged return to baseline (485 +/- 37 v 313 +/- 13 min, P less than 0.01) of plasma free insulin levels after subcutaneous injection of insulin, and a prolonged half-life (19.8 +/- 5.8 v 4.3 +/- 0.3 min, P less than 0.02), increased distribution space (904 +/- 284 v 109 +/- 10 mL/kg, P less than 0.001), and augmented metabolic clearance rate (28.5 +/- 1.8 v 17.3 +/- 0.7 mL/kg/min, P less than 0.001) after intravenously infused insulin. All of these abnormal parameters were significantly correlated with binding of insulin to insulin antibodies at tracer insulin concentrations (Bo) and with the high affinity of insulin antibody binding sites as determined by Scatchard analysis. However, patients with 125I insulin antibody binding (Bo) less than 10 percent had normal or near normal plasma free insulin pharmacokinetics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)