Response patterns to DL-carnitine in patients on maintenance haemodialysis

Levocarnitine supplementation for management of hypertriglyceridemia in patients receiving parenteral nutrition

BACKGROUND

Levocarnitine deficiency has been observed in patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) and can cause or worsen hypertriglyceridemia. The objective was to characterize use of levocarnitine supplementation in PN and evaluate its effect on triglyceride levels in hospitalized adults.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study included patients with triglyceride levels ≥175 mg/dl while receiving PN who had a subsequent reduction in lipid injectable emulsion dose. A piecewise linear regression was used to evaluate trends in triglyceride levels before and after the intervention, defined as initiation of levocarnitine in PN for the levocarnitine group, or reduction in lipid injectable emulsion alone for the control group.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-one patients who received PN had an elevated triglyceride level and lipid injectable emulsion dose reduction, of which 97 (37.2%) received levocarnitine in PN. The median (IQR) levocarnitine dose added to PN was 8.0 (5.7-9.9) mg/kg. Triglyceride levels at 30 days post-intervention did not differ between groups (125 vs 176 mg/dl, P = .345). The addition of levocarnitine to PN was associated with a significantly greater rate of reduction in triglyceride levels pre-intervention to post-intervention compared with a reduction in lipid injectable emulsion alone (-11 vs -3 mg/dl per day; 95% CI, -15 to -2; P = .012).

CONCLUSION

In hospitalized adults with hypertriglyceridemia who had a lipid injectable emulsion dose reduction, the addition of levocarnitine in PN was not associated with a difference in triglyceride levels at 30 days; however, a greater rate of improvement in pre-intervention to post-intervention triglyceride levels was observed.

Lipid-lowering therapy in patients with renal disease

A growing number of clinical trials have examined the effects of different lipid lowering strategies in patients with renal disease. We carried out a meta-analysis to compare and contrast the relative efficacy of various antilipemic therapies in different renal disease settings. Studies that investigated one or more therapies designed to lower serum lipids were combined using weighted multiple linear regression. The analysis adjusted treatment effects for differences in baseline lipid levels and possible placebo effects. The results showed that antilipemic therapies generally had similar effects on lipids in different renal disease settings. In nephrotic syndrome the greatest and most consistent reductions in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) were seen with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (regression coefficient with 95% confidence interval in mg/dl = -63, -79 to -46). Similar results were seen for LDL in renal transplant (-51, -57 to -45), renal insufficiency (-62, -82 to -42), hemodialysis (-65, -80 to -50) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients (-84, -104 to -64). Fibric acid analogues had less effect on LDL, but caused greater reductions in triglycerides: -132, -178 to -87, in nephrotic syndrome; -69, -93 to -45 in transplant: -107, -169 to -45 in renal insufficiency; -72, -120 to -24 in hemodialysis; and -96, -162 to -30 in CAPD. In general, the effects of diet and other therapies were less consistent. Despite possible limitations of this meta-analysis, the results provide a useful framework for choosing antilipemic therapy, and point to areas for future long-term studies examining the safety and efficacy of lipid lowering strategies in patients with renal disease.

Multicenter trial of L-carnitine in maintenance hemodialysis patients. I. Carnitine concentrations and lipid effects

Previous studies have reported conflicting results of carnitine supplementation on plasma lipids in patients with chronic renal failure. We therefore performed a four center, double-blind placebo controlled trial to evaluate the effects of post-hemodialysis intravenous injection of L-carnitine in ESRD patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Thirty-eight patients received up to six months of L-carnitine infusions (20 mg/kg) post-dialysis and 44 patients received placebo infusions. In both groups of patients, baseline pre-dialysis plasma and red blood cell total carnitine levels were normal, but pre-dialysis plasma-free carnitine concentrations and free/total ratios were subnormal, and plasma acyl levels were elevated. Post-dialysis plasma free and total carnitine concentrations were also subnormal. Plasma and red blood cell total carnitine levels rose eightfold in carnitine recipients, but were unchanged from baseline in those receiving placebo. There were no significant changes observed in plasma triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol or other lipoprotein parameters in either the carnitine or placebo treated groups. We conclude that carnitine metabolism is altered in uremia. Furthermore, in a randomly-selected hemodialysis population, L-carnitine injection at the dose of 20 mg/kg results in significant increases in blood (and perhaps tissue) carnitine levels, but this is not associated with any major effects on lipid profiles.

Carnitine deficiency in haemodialysed patients

Free carnitine, acylcarnitine and total carnitine concentrations have been determined in the sera of chronic renal insufficiency patients undergoing regular haemodialysis treatment and in those of healthy controls. The most striking difference was found to be the high proportion of acylated carnitine (23.4 mumol/l) in the haemodialysed patients. Free carnitine and acylcarnitine levels were not completely restored between successive dialysis treatments, making levels measured immediately before the third weekly sessions significantly lower than those measured before the first session (p less than 0.01). In patients monitored throughout 25 wk of treatment, there was an exponential decay of both total serum carnitine levels (Spearman's r = -0.993, p less than 0.001) and free carnitine levels (Spearman's r = -0.972, p less than 0.001). It is suggested that in the absence of exogenous supplies of carnitine, endogenous synthesis is unable to make up for losses due to dialysis treatment, and that carnitine deficiency consequently ensues.

Carnitine: an overview of its role in preventive medicine

Carnitine (beta-hydroxy-gamma-N-trimethylaminobutyric acid) is required for transport of long-chain fatty acids into the inner mitochondrial compartment for beta-oxidation. Widely distributed in foods from animal, but not plant, sources, carnitine is also synthesized endogenously from two essential amino acids, lysine and methionine. Human skeletal and cardiac muscles contain relatively high carnitine concentrations which they receive from the plasma, since they are incapable of carnitine biosynthesis themselves. Since the discovery of a primary genetic carnitine deficiency syndrome in 1973, carnitine has become the subject of extensive research. It is now recognized that carnitine deficiency may also occur secondary to genetic disorders of intermediary metabolism as well as to a variety of clinical disorders, including renal disease treated by hemodialysis, the renal Fanconi syndrome, cirrhosis, untreated diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, Reye's syndrome, and certain disorders of the endocrine, neuromuscular, and reproductive systems. Administration of the anticonvulsant valproic acid and total parenteral nutrition may also induce hypocarnitinemia. In many instances, the physiological implications of secondary carnitine deficiency have not been resolved. However, evidence for a specific carnitine requirement for the newborn, especially if preterm, is accumulating. Moreover, carnitine administration may have a favorable effect on some forms of hyperlipoproteinemia. Carnitine, now recognized as a conditionally essential nutrient, is a significant factor in preventive medicine.

Potential role of carnitine in patients with renal insufficiency

Carnitine metabolism is altered in renal insufficiency and influenced by the treatment modalities. Chronically uremic patients with end-stage renal disease under conservative therapy, hemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis show low, normal, or elevated serum levels of TC and a distorted pattern of FC, SCAC, and LCAC. HD induces a marked depletion of FC, while predialytic elevated SCAC and LCAC are in the normal range at the end of dialysis treatment. All carnitine fractions rapidly return to predialysis levels 6 h after HD due to a transport of carnitine from muscle stores to plasma pool. Muscle carnitine content is elevated in chronic uremic patients under conservative therapy. Normal or decreased levels are observed in patients on long-term HD treatment. In addition, weekly losses of carnitine in patients undergoing HD or peritoneal dialysis do not exceed urinary carnitine excretion of CO. Supplementation with currently recommended doses (1-2 g L-carnitine i.v. at the end of each HD) is followed by a marked rise in plasma carnitine levels, suggesting limited carnitine utilization in uremia. Therefore, lower carnitine doses and modified application regimens should be considered to avoid exaggerated plasma levels of carnitine and carnitine esters. Furthermore, carnitine application has been reported to show beneficial, worsening, or no effect on the deranged lipid metabolism of the uremic patients. In patients undergoing CAPD or IPD predominantly normal serum carnitine levels have been reported. On the other hand, SCAC and LCAC esters are markedly elevated in these patients. After kidney transplantation the pattern of carnitine fractions is fully normalized in patients with plasma creatinine less than or equal to 120 mumol/l.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Plasma lipoproteins, liver function and glucose metabolism in haemodialysis patients: lack of effect of L-carnitine supplementation

The effects of L-carnitine administration (2 g i.v. three times weekly for 6 weeks) were studied in a double blind trial comprising 2 X 14 patients on regular haemodialysis treatment. The initial plasma carnitine concentrations were normal in the male, but slightly lowered in the female participants and rose more than ten-fold in the patients receiving active treatment. The majority (15/28) of patients had moderate hypertriglyceridaemia, whereas plasma HDL cholesterol levels were normal. Activities of hepatic and lipoprotein lipase were decreased and fat tolerance impaired. The S-triiodothyronine and/or thyroxine levels were subnormal in 11 patients. Four patients had fasting hyperinsulinemia, and 6 demonstrated abnormal B-glucose patterns after a peroral glucose load. The galactose elimination rate demonstrated moderately impaired hepatocyte function in four patients. No effects of carnitine treatment on any of the variables could be detected.

Fat metabolism following an intravenous bolus dose of a fat emulsion and carnitine

Intravenous fat tolerance tests were performed with (carboxyl-14C)-triolein labelled Intralipid in four normal subjects with and without L-carnitine administration, 20 and 25 mg/kg body weight. The pharmacokinetics of L-carnitine was studied simultaneously with measurements of variables reflecting fat metabolism during 4 h. 3-OH-butyrate concentration in plasma was higher in all subjects when carnitine was given. No effect of carnitine was found in elimination of the exogenous triglycerides, the 14CO2 activity in expired air, concentration and specific radioactivity of non- esterified fatty acids or glucose in plasma. The data suggest that carnitine may slightly increase fatty acid oxidation in normal subjects provided that increase of 3-OH-butyrate concentration in plasma is the most sensitive variable reflecting fatty acid oxidation of the variables applied in this study.

Heat inhibition of in vitro lipolysis and 14C ibuprofen protein binding in plasma from heparinized uraemic subjects

Protein binding determination in post heparin plasma samples is complicated by the continued post heparin lipase activity, in vitro, during the binding analysis. The decomposition of lipoproteins and accumulation of nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) results in artifically elevated free fractions of many drugs. This artefact is particularly accentuated in haemodialysis patients who are frequently hypertriglyceridaemic and receive large doses of heparin. Rapid heat treatment (60 degrees for 15 min) of plasma from heparinized uraemic subjects is shown to inhibit the in vitro lipolysis occurring during 2 hours of equilibrium dialysis at 37 degrees (ED). Mean NEFA concentrations in heat treated plasma after ED (means = 400 +/- 141 mumol/L) were not different (p greater than 0.05, n = 9) from the baseline values in fresh plasma (means 351 +/- 117 mumol/L) but were considerably less (p less than 0.005) than NEFA levels in untreated plasma after ED (means = 1025 +/- 523 mumol/L). The degree of in vitro lipolysis inhibition (92 +/- 6.6%) was very much greater than using the chemical inhibitors phenyl methyl sulphonyl fluoride, EDTA, Triton X100 or protamine sulphate. Heat treatment at 60 degrees for 15 min increased the percentage of free 14C ibuprofen in 3.5% isolated human serum albumin from 0.34% to 0.62%. Reduced binding as a result of heat treatment was not observed however in whole plasma. The percentage free ibuprofen in heat treated, whole plasma from both heparinized and non heparinized subjects (means = 1.22 +/- 0.19; n = 29) was not different (p greater than 0.05) from the percentage free determined in plasma from a non heparinized group (means = 1.16 +/- 0.23; n = 15). In contrast the % free ibuprofen in untreated plasma from heparinized subjects was markedly higher (means = 1.56 +/- 0.41; n = 24; p less than 0.05). There was a strong correlation between % free ibuprofen and plasma NEFA concentration (r = 0.8; p less than 0.005; n = 68). The heat treatment of plasma for 15 min at 60 degrees is proposed as an effective means of controlling heparin induced lipolysis in vitro and may be valuable in overcoming the post heparin binding artefact.