Pharmacokinetics of carboplatin in a patient suffering from advanced ovarian carcinoma with hemodialysis-dependent renal insufficiency

Eligibility Criteria for Different Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Regimens in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Introduction Bladder cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Treatment options for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) primarily include platinum-based chemotherapy. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is conventionally used for treating mUC, but many patients are ineligible due to various factors such as poor performance status, creatinine clearance, neuropathy, and cardiac function. Carboplatin-based therapy is another alternative, which typically yields less favorable outcomes. Some centers use split-dose cisplatin for treating patients with comorbidities and impaired renal function, broadening cisplatin's spectrum. While eligibility criteria for full-dose cisplatin are well-established, those for split-dose cisplatin and carboplatin lack strong evidence. This study aims to assess the recommended criteria for full-dose cisplatin, split-dose cisplatin, and carboplatin regimens in real-world settings, including hematological parameters for patients with mUC. Methods  A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted among 136 oncologists from 21 countries, assessing criteria such as creatinine clearance, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), neurotoxicity, hearing loss, heart failure classification, and hematological parameters. Results The survey revealed diverse preferences among 113 oncologists treating mUC, regarding the eligibility criteria for each chemotherapy regimen with 81% prioritizing full-dose cisplatin, 21% split-dose cisplatin, and 14% carboplatin regimens. Criteria for all three regimens included specific thresholds. For full-dose cisplatin, the preferred criteria included creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min, ECOG PS ≤1, grade 1 neuropathy, grade 1 deafness, New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure ≤class II with ≥50% cardiac ejection fraction, and normal blood parameters. Split-dose cisplatin criteria were creatinine clearance ≥40 mL/min, ECOG PS ≤2, grade 1 neuropathy, grade 1 deafness, NYHA heart failure ≤class II with ≥50% cardiac ejection fraction, and normal blood parameters. Carboplatin eligibility criteria were creatinine clearance ≥30, ECOG PS ≤2, grade ≤2 neuropathy, grade ≤2 deafness, NYHA heart failure ≤class II with ≥50% cardiac ejection fraction, and normal blood parameters. Hematological parameters were deemed crucial for all regimens, particularly stringent for carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Conclusion The study underscores the importance of renal function and hematological parameters in determining chemotherapy eligibility for patients with mUC. It highlights the importance of precise treatment criteria in mUC management, with hematological factors playing a significant role. Standardized criteria and further research are warranted to optimize treatment outcomes and minimize adverse events associated with chemotherapy regimens. Understanding the preferences of oncologists globally can facilitate tailored treatment approaches and improve patient care in the management of mUC.

Durvalumab plus carboplatin-etoposide treatment in a patient with small-cell lung cancer on hemodialysis: a case report and literature review

Little is known about the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus carboplatin-etoposide treatment in patients with extensive-disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) on hemodialysis. Here, we present a case of a 67-year-old man with pleuroperitoneal communication on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis who was diagnosed with ED-SCLC based on a cytological analysis of the peritoneal fluid. He was switched from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis and received durvalumab (1500 mg/body on day 1) plus carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve = 5, 125 mg on day 1) and etoposide (50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 3) as first-line therapy. During the first cycle, grade 2 anemia, grade 3 neutropenia, and grade 3 upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred; therefore, durvalumab and reduced doses of carboplatin and etoposide were administered. No other severe adverse events occurred, and a partial response was observed after four cycles. Our findings indicate that durvalumab plus carboplatin-etoposide treatment is safe and effective even in patients on hemodialysis.

Therapeutic targeting of angiopoietins in tumor angiogenesis and cancer development

The formation and progression of tumors in humans are linked to the abnormal development of new blood vessels known as neo-angiogenesis. Angiogenesis is a broad word that encompasses endothelial cell migration, proliferation, tube formation, and intussusception, as well as peri-EC recruitment and extracellular matrix formation. Tumor angiogenesis is regulated by angiogenic factors, out of which some of the most potent angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor and Angiopoietins (ANGs) in the body are produced by macrophages and other immune cells within the tumor microenvironment. ANGs have a distinct function in tumor angiogenesis and behavior. ANG1, ANG 2, ANG 3, and ANG 4 are the family members of ANG out of which ANG2 has been extensively investigated owing to its unique role in modifying angiogenesis and its tight association with tumor progression, growth, and invasion/metastasis, which makes it an excellent candidate for therapeutic intervention in human malignancies. ANG modulators have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in the treatment of tumor development, either alone or in conjunction with VEGF inhibitors. Future development of more ANG modulators targeting other ANGs is needed. The implication of ANG1, ANG3, and ANG4 as probable therapeutic targets for anti-angiogenesis treatment in tumor development should be also evaluated. The article has described the role of ANG in tumor angiogenesis as well as tumor growth and the treatment strategies modulating ANGs in tumor angiogenesis as demonstrated in clinical studies. The pharmacological modulation of ANGs and ANG-regulated pathways that are responsible for tumor angiogenesis and cancer development should be evaluated for the development of future molecular therapies.

Treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with carboplatin and paclitaxel in a patient undergoing hemodialysis: Case report and literature review

A 69-year-old woman under maintenance hemodialysis was diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer. We treated the patient with combination chemotherapy using paclitaxel and carboplatin. She experienced grade 4 thrombopenia on day 8 of the third course. The area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) of platinum was 3.5 mg/ml·min. The interval between chemotherapy and hemodialysis was shortened starting with the fourth course. The AUC of platinum was then found to be 1.8 mg/ml·min. After seven courses of chemotherapy, the patient's CA 125 serum level dropped from 1317 to 42.6 U/ml. Nevertheless, the patient presented with long periods of severe myelosuppression. In patients on hemodialysis receiving such chemotherapy, the AUC of each cycle should be closely monitored and the dialysis schedule should be adjusted as need to reduce the risk of bone marrow suppression.

Cancer Drug Dosing in Chronic Kidney Disease and Dialysis

Patients with malignancies have a high prevalence of kidney disease and are often treated with antineoplastic agents that undergo kidney metabolism or excretion or clearance via renal replacement therapies. Thus, the dosing of these agents, including classic chemotherapeutic drugs, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy, must take into account patients' kidney function. In this review, we will discuss the pitfalls of accurate measurement of kidney function and how kidney disease affects both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of drugs. Lastly, we will discuss specific agents and summarize current dosing strategies for use in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease.

Diversity of dose-individualization and therapeutic drug monitoring practices of platinum compounds: a review

Introduction: Platinum-derived drugs are commonly used for the treatment of solid tumors. The differences in chemical structures of these molecules lead to different pharmacological properties, in terms of indication, efficacy, and toxicity. Their pharmacokinetics (PK) differ according to their respective renal elimination and have led to many studies investigating their dose optimization. Area covered: This review attempts to summarize and compare PK and pharmacodynamics of cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin, with an emphasis on differences of dose calculations and opportunities for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in various patient populations. Expert opinion: Although cisplatin and carboplatin can be considered as analogs since they share the same DNA interacting properties, the slower hydrolysis of the latter results in a better safety profile. Carboplatin is the only drug in oncology to be administrated according to a target area under the curve of concentration versus time, considering that its PK variability is almost fully explained by renal function, not by body size. This enables individual dosing based on predicted carboplatin clearance (along with patients renal characteristics) or on actual clearance with TDM, especially in a high-dose protocol.

Management of patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing chemotherapy: recommendations of the Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica (AIOM) and the Società Italiana di Nefrologia (SIN)

Background

The overall risk of some cancers is increased in patients receiving regular dialysis treatment due to chronic oxidative stress, a weakened immune system and enhanced genomic damage. These patients could benefit from the same antineoplastic treatment delivered to patients with normal renal function, but a better risk/benefit ratio could be achieved by establishing specific guidelines. Key considerations are which chemotherapeutic agent to use, adjustment of dosages and timing of dialysis in relation to the administration of chemotherapy.

Methods

We have reviewed available data present in the literature, including recommendations and expert opinions on cancer risk and use of chemotherapeutic agents in patients with end-stage renal disease. Experts selected by the boards of the societies provided additional information which helped greatly in clarifying some issues on which clear-cut information was missing or available data were conflicting.

Results

Data on the optimal use of chemotherapeutic agents or on credible schemes of polychemotherapy in haemodialysed patients are sparse and mainly derive from case reports or small case series. However, recommendations on dosing and timing of dialysis can be proposed for the most prescribed chemotherapeutic agents.

Discussion

The use of chemotherapeutic agents as single agents, or in combination, can be safely given in patients with end-stage renal disease. Appropriate dosage adjustments should be considered based on drug dialysability and pharmacokinetics. Coordinated care between oncologists, nephrologists and pharmacists is of pivotal importance to optimise drug delivery and timing of dialysis.

Pharmacokinetic analyses of carboplatin in a patient with cancer of the fallopian tubes undergoing hemodialysis: A case report

Opportunities for patients undergoing hemodialysis to receive chemotherapy are increasing. A combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) is first-line chemotherapy in patients with Müllerian cancer. However, the optimal dose and time interval between the end of carboplatin administration and initiation of hemodialysis remains to be elucidated. TC was administered to a patient with fallopian tube cancer undergoing hemodialysis. The paclitaxel regimen was determined to be 135 mg/m² (total of 210 mg) over 3 h. After paclitaxel administration, 125 mg of carboplatin was administered over 1 h to achieve a target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5.0 mg•min/ml using the Calvert formula. The time interval between the end of carboplatin administration and hemodialysis initiation was 1 h at the first cycle, 16 h at the second cycle and 20 h at the third cycle, and the AUC obtained was 2.86, 4.16 and 6.0 mg•min/ml, respectively. The desired AUC of free platinum was demonstrated and only mild side effects were observed at the third cycle. Therefore, hemodialysis was initiated 20 h after completion of carboplatin infusion at cycles 4-6. The total chemotherapy planned was completed without severe adverse events. Measurement of the concentration of free platinum subsequent to administration is useful for determination of the optimal dose of carboplatin and time interval following administration to obtain an adequate AUC. The present study suggests that carboplatin can be administered to a patient undergoing hemodialysis, and that an adequate interval between the end of carboplatin administration and hemodialysis initiation may be ~20 h.

Extension of the Calvert formula to patients with severe renal insufficiency

PURPOSE

The Calvert formula was derived from the study among patients with glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) of 33-135 ml/min, and it remains unclear whether the formula can be used to calculate optimal and safe dosages of carboplatin in patients with severe renal insufficiency. We evaluated the utility of this formula in patients with severe renal insufficiency.

METHODS

For pharmacokinetic analysis, we studied nine adult Japanese patients with advanced cancer who had an estimated GFR of lower than 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2), as calculated by the Japanese equation for estimating GFR, or who were receiving hemodialysis. The dose of carboplatin was calculated with the Calvert formula, in which GFR was measured by inulin clearance or was assumed to be 0 in patients requiring hemodialysis. Hemodialysis was started 23 h after the end of carboplatin infusion.

RESULTS

Although there was a significant correlation between the estimated and measured carboplatin clearance, the estimated clearance was consistently higher than the measured clearance [mean prediction error ± standard deviation = 41.0 ± 26.3 %] in all seven patients with renal insufficiency (GFR, median 21.4, range 7.8-31.4 ml/min) and in the two hemodialysis patients. Actual areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) (mg/ml min) were 5.4, 5.7, 6.2, and 9.0 for the four patients with a target AUC (mg/ml min) of 5; 5.7, 6.2, and 7.1 for the three patients with a target AUC (mg/ml min) of 4; and 5.1 and 8.7 for the two hemodialysis patients with a target AUC (mg/ml min) of 5. The measured clearance of carboplatin ranged from 23.0 to 51.3 ml/min in the seven patients not receiving hemodialysis. The pre-hemodialysis carboplatin clearance in the hemodialysis patients was 20.5 and 11.1 ml/min, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For adult patients with severe renal insufficiency, the Calvert formula causes carboplatin overdosing by overestimating the carboplatin clearance.

Pharmacokinetics of Carboplatin in a One-Year-Old Anuric Boy Undergoing Hemodialysis and a Review of the Literature

There have been few reports of carboplatin-based chemotherapy for anuric infants. As we had a chance to treat a one-year-old anuric hepatoblastoma patient with carboplatin, we performed a pharmacokinetic analysis and examined the optimal treatment strategy. A one-year-old anuric boy under peritoneal dialysis was diagnosed with hepatoblastoma. Surgical resection was performed, and administration of carboplatin was scheduled postoperatively aiming at 5 mg·min/mL of the area under the curve from the time of dosing to the time of the last observation (AUC(0-t)). We set the initial dose at 50 mg, higher than that calculated by the Calvert formula (34 mg); the time from the end of carboplatin infusion to the initiation of hemodialysis at 2 h; and the hemodialysis duration at 24 h. The actual AUC0-t was 3.05 mg·min/mL because the elimination half-lives before and during hemodialysis were shorter than expected. The AUC(0-t) after the second dose (100 mg) and the third dose (80 mg) were 7.00 and 4.68 mg·min/mL, respectively. The Calvert formula is not suitable for hemodialysis patients because removal of platinum by hemodialysis is not taken into account. It appears that extrarenal clearance in anuric infants is different from that in adults. We obtained an optimal AUC(0-t) using a dose of 80 mg (200 mg/m(2)), setting the time from the end of carboplatin infusion to the initiation of hemodialysis at 2 h, and performing 8-h hemodialysis. Further accumulation of the pharmacokinetic data of carboplatin is necessary for anuric children.

[Management of chemotherapy in hemodialysis patients]

BACKGROUND

The increased incidence of cancer in dialysis patients has been discussed since the mid-70s. Consequently, oncologists, nephrologists and pharmacists are increasingly facing challenging situations of cytotoxic drug handling in dialysis patients. In dialysis patients, two main issues must be considered. First, renal function of hemodialysis (HD) patients is no longer functional. Therefore, these patients may necessitate drug dosage reduction, namely drug prescription, must be cautiously checked before administration with appropriate dosage adjustment whenever necessary to ensure efficacy while avoiding overdosage and related side effects. Secondly, drug clearance by dialysis must be taken into account for appropriate chemotherapy timing in order to avoid drug removal, which may result in a loss of efficacy.

METHODS

We reviewed the international literature on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, tolerance and dosage adjustment of anticancer drugs used on hemodialysis cancer patients, using the key words: kidney, renal, dialysis, hemodialysis, end-stage renal disease and the name of each drug.

RESULTS

Only case reports and small series were found. 57.1% of the drugs need dosage adjustment and 64.3% should be administered after the dialysis session.

CONCLUSION

Cancer treatment in feasible in dialysis patients. Some drugs require dosage adaptation while others can be given as in patients with normal kidney function. These patients need coordinated care between oncologists, nephrologists and pharmacists to optimize drug delivery and logistics. Frailty scores, like in oncogeriatrics, should be built to optimally adapt cancer treatments in these dialysis patients.

Cancer and renal insufficiency results of the BIRMA study

Background:

Half of anticancer drugs are predominantly excreted in urine. Dosage adjustment in renal insufficiency (RI) is, therefore, a crucial issue. Moreover, patients with abnormal renal function are at high risk for drug-induced nephrotoxicity. The Belgian Renal Insufficiency and Anticancer Medications (BIRMA) study investigated the prevalence of RI in cancer patients, and the profile/dosing of anticancer drugs prescribed.

Methods:

Primary end point: to estimate the prevalence of abnormal glomerular filtration rate (GFR; estimated with the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) and RI in cancer patient. Secondary end point: to describe the profile of anticancer drugs prescribed (dose reduction/nephrotoxicity). Data were collected for patients presenting at one of the seven Belgian BIRMA centres in March 2006.

Results:

A total of 1218 patients were included. The prevalence of elevated SCR (⩾1.2 mg per 100 ml) was 14.9%, but 64.0% had a GFR<90 ml min⁻¹ per 1.73 m². In all, 78.6% of treated patients (n=1087) were receiving at least one drug needing dosage adjustment and 78.1% received at least one nephrotoxic drug. In all, 56.5% of RI patients receiving chemotherapy requiring dose reduction in case of RI did not receive dose adjustment.

Conclusions:

The RI is highly frequent in cancer patients. In all, 80% of the patients receive potentially nephrotoxic drugs and/or for which dosage must be adjusted in RI. Oncologists should check the appropriate dose of chemotherapeutic drugs in relation to renal function before prescribing.

Pharmacokinetics of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in a patient with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing hemodialysis

Few reports delineate the pharmacokinetics of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in hemodialysis (HD) patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. However, the optimal carboplatin dose and the timing of HD have yet to be elucidated. We presented a case of an advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer patient with chronic renal failure requiring HD. After 4 courses of combination chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel and carboplatin, a partial response was obtained; therefore, she underwent interval debulking surgery. Paclitaxel was administered for 3 h at a dose of 150 mg/m(2), and carboplatin was administered for 1 h at a dose of 4-7 area under the concentration/time curve (AUC), which was calculated by the Calvert formula. HD was initiated 24 h after the start of administration of carboplatin and performed for a period of 3 h. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that the AUCs of free platinum and paclitaxel were 3.48-5.55 mg·min/ml and 13.5 μg·h/ml, respectively. Combination chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel and carboplatin is a feasible approach to improving the treatment outcome of epithelial ovarian cancer patients with chronic renal failure requiring HD. The measurement of free platinum is useful in determining the optimal dose of carboplatin in order to obtain an adequate AUC. Determining the dose of carboplatin according to the Calvert formula and initiating HD after 24 h would ensure a favorable therapeutic effect with limited side effects.

Proposal for dosage adjustment and timing of chemotherapy in hemodialyzed patients

BACKGROUND

The increased incidence of malignancies in patients with chronic renal failure has been discussed since the mid-70s. On the other hand, the high frequency of chronic renal insufficiency among cancer patients has been recently assessed in the Insuffisance Rénale et Médicaments Anticancéreux Study which demonstrated a prevalence as high as 50%-60% of the patients for all stages of kidney disease. Furthermore, the incidence of end-stage renal disease is growing worldwide and so is the number of patients on chronic dialysis, hemodialysis (HD) for the large majority of them. As a result, the question of cytotoxic drug handling in those patients in terms of dosage adjustment and time of administration regarding the dialysis sessions needs to be addressed to optimize cytotoxic drug therapy in those patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the international literature on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, tolerance and dosage adjustment of cytotoxic drugs used to treat solid tumor patients and when available, specific literature on HD cancer patients.

RESULTS

From these data, dosing recommendations are given for the most prescribed cytotoxic drugs in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Dosage adjustments are often necessary in HD cancer patients. These adaptations have to be carefully carried out to optimize drug exposure, ensure efficacy and reduce the risk of side-effects.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of carboplatin and etoposide in a small cell lung cancer patient undergoing hemodialysis

Cancer chemotherapy is not well established for patients on hemodialysis (HD). A 77-year-old man on HD presented with small cell lung cancer. He was treated with the combination of carboplatin and etoposide while the pharmacokinetics of the drugs were monitored. The patient showed a response with manageable toxicity and remained progression free for at least 8 months. The area under the concentration-time curve for each antitumor agent in the patient was within the therapeutic range achieved in individuals with normal renal function. Carboplatin and etoposide chemotherapy combined with HD thus allowed the drugs to achieve an appropriate area under the concentration-time curve and sufficient efficacy in a small cell lung cancer patient with chronic renal failure.

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: pharmacokinetics and clinical outcome of paclitaxel and carboplatin treatment

Purpose

Administration of chemotherapy in patients with renal failure, treated with hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is still a challenge and literature data is scarce. Here we present a case study of a patient on CAPD, treated with weekly and three-weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin for recurrent ovarian cancer.

Experimental

During the first, second and ninth cycle of treatment, blood, urine and CAPD samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis of paclitaxel and total and unbound carboplatin-derived platinum.

Results

Treatment was well tolerated by the patient. No excessive toxicity was observed and at the end of treatment she was in a complete remission. The plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel were unaltered compared to historical data, with neglectable urinary and CAPD clearance. In contrast, the pharmacokinetics of carboplatin were altered, with doubled half-lives compared to patients with normal renal function. Of the administered carboplatin dose, up to 20% was cleared via the dialysate, while only up to 8% was cleared via the urine.

Conclusion

Paclitaxel and carboplatin can be safely administered to patients with chronic renal failure on CAPD. For paclitaxel the generally applied dose can be administered, and although for carboplatin dose-adjustment is required due to the diminished renal function, the dose can be calculated using Calvert’s formula.

Systemic anticancer therapy in gynecological cancer patients with renal dysfunction

Chronic kidney disease is a common occurrence in patients with gynecological cancer. Systemic anticancer treatment in such patients is a challenge for clinicians because of altered drug pharmacokinetics. For those drugs that are excreted mainly by the kidneys, decreased renal function may lead to increased systemic exposure and increased toxicity. Dose adjustment based on pharmacokinetic changes is required in this situation to avoid life-threatening toxicity. In this review, we summarize the nephrotoxicity and pharmacokinetic data of agents commonly used in systemic anticancer treatment of gynecological cancers and dose adjustment guidelines in the presence of impaired renal function. We review 17 medications that need dose adjustment (cisplatin, carboplatin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, topotecan, irinotecan, etoposide, capecitabine, bleomycin, methotrexate, actinomycin D, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, metoclopramide, cimetidine, and diphenhydramine) as well as 27 drugs that do not (paclitaxel, docetaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, vincristine, letrozole, anastrozole, tamoxifen, leuprorelin, megestrol, gefitinib, erlotinib, trastuzumab, leucovorin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, erythropoietin, ondansetron, granisetron, palonosetron, tropisetron, dolasetron, aprepitant, dexamethasone, lorazepam, and diazepam). We also review the formulae commonly used to estimate creatinine clearance, including Cockcroft-Gault, Chatelut, Jelliffe, Wright, and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study formulae.

International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) recommendations for the adjustment of dosing in elderly cancer patients with renal insufficiency

A SIOG taskforce was formed to discuss best clinical practice for elderly cancer patients with renal insufficiency. This manuscript outlines recommended dosing adjustments for cancer drugs in this population according to renal function. Dosing adjustments have been made for drugs in current use which have recommendations in renal insufficiency and the elderly, focusing on drugs which are renally eliminated or are known to be nephrotoxic. Recommendations are based on pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic data where available. The taskforce recommend that before initiating therapy, some form of geriatric assessment should be conducted that includes evaluation of comorbidities and polypharmacy, hydration status and renal function (using available formulae). Within each drug class, it is sensible to use agents which are less likely to be influenced by renal clearance. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of anticancer agents in the elderly are needed in order to maximise efficacy whilst avoiding unacceptable toxicity.

Drug dosing in chronic kidney disease

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions. Drug dosing in these patients often proves to be a difficult task. Renal dysfunction-induced changes in human pathophysiology regularly results may alter medication pharmacodynamics and handling. Several pharmacokinetic parameters are adversely affected by CKD, secondary to a reduced oral absorption and glomerular filtration; altered tubular secretion; and reabsorption and changes in intestinal, hepatic, and renal metabolism. In general, drug dosing can be accomplished by multiple methods; however, the most common recommendations are often to reduce the dose or expand the dosing interval, or use both methods simultaneously. Some medications need to be avoided all together in CKD either because of lack of efficacy or increased risk of toxicity. Nevertheless, specific recommendations are available for dosing of certain medications and are an important resource, because most are based on clinical or pharmacokinetic trials.

Clinical course of haemodialysis patients with malignancies and dose-adjusted chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy is not given routinely to patients with malignancies receiving chronic haemodialysis because evidence of a clear benefit is still lacking and severe side effects are feared. The aim of our retrospective study was to analyse the methods of dose adjustment and the clinical course of chronic haemodialysis patients with malignancies treated by chemotherapy.

METHODS

Between 1985 and 2001, a total of 48 cycles of 21 chemotherapy protocols were administered to 16 dialysis patients with nine haemoblastic and seven solid malignancies. We compared the dose actually administered with that theoretically derived from the proportional dose reduction rule of Dettli and the rule of Giusti and Hayton, using published pharmacokinetic parameters.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier estimates of median survival time were 30 months in patients with haemoblastic malignancies and 10 months for patients with solid malignancies. Eleven chemotherapies were administered in standard dosages and 10 chemotherapies in reduced dosages (39-80% of the regular dose); in all therapies, however, the dose was significantly higher than proposed by the Dettli rule (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy in patients with haemodialysis is feasible. Individual dose adjustment should be performed on the basis of pharmacokinetic data and the general condition of the patient, but it is still a matter of expert judgement, as there is no formal evidence available.

Effect of haemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of antineoplastic drugs

Since renal failure itself creates an immunocompromised situation, malignant tumours in haemodialysis patients are increasing due to the prolonged lifespan of these patients. In treating these patients with anticancer agents, dosage reduction is often recommended to avoid adverse drug reactions, particularly for drugs with extensive renal excretion. On the other hand, if an anticancer drug is removed significantly by haemodialysis, dosage increase would be required to ensure adequate therapeutic efficacy. We address in this review the clinical pharmacokinetic aspects of antineoplastic therapy, and the application of pharmacokinetic principles to the adjustment of dosage of anticancer agents in haemodialysis patients.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of combination chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide in small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to use pharmacokinetic analysis to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of combined chemotherapy with carboplatin (CBDCA) and etoposide (ETP) in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis (HD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three SCLC patients with chronic renal failure undergoing HD were treated with CBDCA (300 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and ETP (50 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 3, followed by HD 1 h after completing the administration of anticancer agents on each day. The pharmacokinetic analysis of CBDCA and ETP was planned for at least the first two courses of the chemotherapy in each patient.

RESULTS

Two complete responses and one partial response were achieved in the three patients. Two patients experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia and required blood transfusion due to thrombocytopenia and anemia. Non-hematological toxicities were moderate. The pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the platinum and the ETP concentrations in the plasma were similar to those in patients with normal renal function during the first 24 h, while the platinum still remained in the plasma for over 90 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy with CBDCA (300 mg/m(2) on day 1) and ETP (50 mg/m(2) on day 1, 3) as used in the present study may be a suitable regimen for SCLC patients undergoing HD, although careful attention should be given to hematological toxicities.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy in a hemodialysis patient with advanced ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

There are few reports on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel combined with carboplatin or on the dose schedule of carboplatin in combination use during hemodialysis in patients with ovarian cancer.

CASE

A 40-year-old woman with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis who had FIGO stage III ovarian cancer was treated with debulking surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel combination chemotherapy. Paclitaxal was administered at 150 mg/m(2) as a 3-h intravenous infusion followed by a 30-min infusion of carboplatin on a nondialysis day. The carboplatin dose was chosen to produce a target area under the concentration/time curve (AUC) of 5.0 microg-min/ml according to the Calvert formula. The pharmacokinetic study showed that the AUCs of free platinum and paclitaxel were 4.43 microg-min/ml and 15.9 microg-h/ml, respectively. Dosing of carboplatin based on the AUC produced an acceptable degree of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. After the completion of five cycles of the combination chemotherapy, the tumor showed complete response, and the patient remained disease free for 8 months.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy can be given to patients undergoing hemodialysis, with dialysis performed 16 h after the administration and with a dose adjustment of carboplatin to reach a target AUC. In these conditions, tumor response can be obtained.

Treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma with carboplatin and paclitaxel in a patient with renal failure

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for ovarian cancer. Since carboplatin elimination occurs largely through the kidneys, its use in patients with hemodialysis-dependent renal failure requires dose adjustments befitting the level of renal function. We employed the AUC (area under the concentration-time curve)- directed dosing strategy (the Calvert formula) to determine the carboplatin dose appropriate for an ovarian cancer patient with renal failure. Our approach is compared and defended against the empiric and thrombocyte nadir-directed dosing strategies. Since carboplatin clearance follows creatinine clearance, we also provide a review of methods and formulas used to determine creatinine clearance. An accurate method to determine creatinine clearance will enable others to use the AUC-directed dosing strategy to establish the carboplatin dose appropriate for patients with some residual renal function.

Drug administration in patients with renal insufficiency. Minimising renal and extrarenal toxicity

Renal insufficiency has been associated with an increased risk of adverse effects with many classes of medications. The risk of some, but not all, adverse effects has been linked to the patient's degree of residual renal function. This may be the result of inappropriate individualisation of those agents that are primarily eliminated by the kidney, or an alteration in the pharmacodynamic response as a result of renal insufficiency. The pathophysiological mechanism responsible for alterations in drug disposition, especially metabolism and renal excretion, is the accumulation of uraemic toxins that may modulate cytochrome P450 enzyme activity and decrease glomerular filtration as well as tubular secretion. The general principles to enhance the safety of drug therapy in patients with renal insufficiency include knowledge of the potential toxicities and interactions of the therapeutic agent, consideration of possible alternatives therapies and individualisation of drug therapy based on patient level of renal function. Although optimisation of the desired therapeutic outcomes are of paramount importance, additional pharmacotherapeutic issues for patients with reduced renal function are the prevention or minimisation of future acute or chronic nephrotoxic insults, as well as the severity and occurrence of adverse effects on other organ systems. Risk factors for the development of nephrotoxicity for selected high-risk therapies (e.g. aminoglycosides, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ACE inhibitors and radiographic contrast media) are quite similar and include pre-existing renal insufficiency, concomitant administration of other nephrotoxins, volume depletion and concomitant hepatic disease or congestive heart failure. Investigations of prophylactic approaches to enhance the safety of these agents in patients with renal insufficiency have yielded inconsistent outcomes. Hydration with saline prior to drug exposure has given the most consistent benefit, while sodium loading and use of pharmacological interventions [e.g. furosemide (frusemide) dopomine/dobutamine, calcium antagonists and mannitol] have resulted in limited success. The mechanisms responsible for altered dynamic responses of some agents (benzodiazepines, theophylline, digoxin and loop diuretics) in renally compromised patients include enhanced receptor sensitivity secondary to the accumulation of endogenous uraemic toxins and competition for secretion to the renal tubular site of action. Application of the pharmacotherapeutic principles discussed into clinical practice will hopefully enhance the safety of these agents and optimise patient outcomes.

Pharmacokinetically guided dosing of carboplatin and etoposide during peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis

Two patients with relapsed Wilms' tumour and renal failure requiring dialysis were given carboplatin and etoposide by pharmacokinetically guided dosing. The target area under the drug plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) was 6 mg ml-1 min for carboplatin and 18 and 21 mg ml-1 min for etoposide. On course 1 measured AUCs of carboplatin and etoposide were 6 and 20 mg ml-1 min for patient 1 and 6 and 21 mg ml-1 min for patient 2 respectively. Peritoneal dialysis did not remove carboplatin or etoposide from the plasma, however carboplatin but not etoposide was cleared by haemodialysis. Therapy with carboplatin and etoposide is possible in children and adults with renal failure who require dialysis, but in this situation pharmacokinetic monitoring is essential.