Serum lipoprotein (a) levels in patients with chronic renal failure--evolution after renal transplantation and relationship with other parameters of lipoprotein metabolism: a prospective study

Hemodialysis Vascular Access Thrombosis and Lipoprotein(A)

Background

Vascular access remains the Achilles's heel of successful hemodialysis and thrombosis is the leading cause of vascular access failure. Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels in hemodialysis patients were reported, and in some studies were also associated with hemodialysis vascular access thrombosis.

Patients and Methods

In our study 84 hemodialysis patients with native arteriovenous fistula were included. Two groups of patients were defined: group A including 61 patients with their vascular access either never or only once thrombosed, and group B including 23 patients with two or more thromboses of their vascular access. We determined serum concentrations of Lp(a) in all our patients.

Results

Average serum Lp(a) concentration for all the patients included in the study was 0.273 ± 0.31 g/l. No relationship was found between serum Lp(a) concentrations and age, gender and duration of dialysis treatment. Serum Lp(a) concentrations were higher in group A than in group B patients (0.301 g/l versus 0.198 g/l), but the difference was not statistically significant. There was also no statistically significant difference between group A and group B regarding age, gender and duration of hemodialysis treatment. The use of a cut-off value for Lp(a) of 0.3 g/l and 0.57 g/l also failed to provide a significant difference between group A and B patients.

Conclusion

We found no significant differences in Lp(a) concentrations between group A (thrombosis-non-prone) and group B (thrombosis-prone) patients. Our results suggest that Lp(a) is not an independent risk factor for vascular access occlusion in hemodialysis patients.

Lipoprotein (a): impact by ethnicity and environmental and medical conditions

Levels of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], a complex between an LDL-like lipid moiety containing one copy of apoB, and apo(a), a plasminogen-derived carbohydrate-rich hydrophilic protein, are primarily genetically regulated. Although stable intra-individually, Lp(a) levels have a skewed distribution inter-individually and are strongly impacted by a size polymorphism of the LPA gene, resulting in a variable number of kringle IV (KIV) units, a key motif of apo(a). The variation in KIV units is a strong predictor of plasma Lp(a) levels resulting in stable plasma levels across the lifespan. Studies have demonstrated pronounced differences across ethnicities with regard to Lp(a) levels and some of this difference, but not all of it, can be explained by genetic variations across ethnic groups. Increasing evidence suggests that age, sex, and hormonal impact may have a modest modulatory influence on Lp(a) levels. Among clinical conditions, Lp(a) levels are reported to be affected by kidney and liver diseases.

Arterial function after successful renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation is increasingly the preferred method of renal replacement therapy. Cardiovascular disease is the major barrier to long-term survival for transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to determine whether the increased arterial stiffness of patients with chronic renal failure is improved after successful renal transplantation.

METHODS

The study involved a group of 36 patients, aged 27 to 68 years (mean +/- SD, 46 +/- 11 years) who had cardiovascular risk assessment and measurements of carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT), arterial pulse wave velocity [aorto-femoral (PWV a-f) and femoral-dorsalis pedis (PWV f-d)], systemic arterial compliance (SAC), and arterial wave reflection (augmentation index, AI(x)) performed before and 12 months after successful renal transplantation. B-mode ultrasound measurements were used to determine mean carotid IMT and applanation tonometry techniques to determine SAC, AI(x), PWV (a-f), PWV (f-d), and central pressures. On each occasion the following were also measured: fasting lipids, homocysteine (tHcy), red cell folate, cobalamin, and fibrinogen levels.

RESULTS

One year after transplantation, mean serum creatinine was 143 +/- 47 micromol/L, and creatinine clearance 60 +/- 16 mL/min/1.74m(2) (range 25 to 104 mL/min/1.74m(2)). Total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were significantly reduced. tHcy was decreased by 38% and normalized in 45%. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were all improved. From baseline to 12 months' post-transplantation, there was no significant change in carotid IMT (mean IMT 0.76 +/- 0.11 vs. 0.75 +/- 0.14 mm, P= 0.28) or SAC (0.45 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.46 +/- 0.22 units, P= 0.95), but PWV [PWV (a-f) 9.6 +/- 2.6 vs. 8.8 +/- 2.2 m/sec, P= 0.007; PWV (f-d) 10.7 +/- 1.8 vs. 8.4 +/- 1.7 m/sec, P < 0.001] and AI(x) (24.3 +/- 13.4 vs. 15.9 +/- 11.4%, P= 0.003) improved. After adjusting for the differences in blood pressure, the changes in PWV (a-f) were no longer significant, but the differences in PWV (f-d) persisted. The change in AI(x) remained significant after adjusting for differences in heart rate, and the fall in AI(x) was greater in patients on immunosuppression with tacrolimus compared with those on cyclosporine.

CONCLUSION

One year after successful renal transplantation, improvement in cardiovascular risk factors was associated with improvement in indices of arterial stiffness.

Recommendations for the outpatient surveillance of renal transplant recipients. American Society of Transplantation

Many complications after renal transplantation can be prevented if they are detected early. Guidelines have been developed for the prevention of diseases in the general population, but there are no comprehensive guidelines for the prevention of diseases and complications after renal transplantation. Therefore, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation developed these guidelines to help physicians and other health care workers provide optimal care for renal transplant recipients. The guidelines are also intended to indirectly help patients receive the access to care that they need to ensure long-term allograft survival, by attempting to systematically define what that care encompasses. The guidelines are applicable to all adult and pediatric renal transplant recipients, and they cover the outpatient screening for and prevention of diseases and complications that commonly occur after renal transplantation. They do not cover the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and complications after they become manifest, and they do not cover the pretransplant evaluation of renal transplant candidates. The guidelines are comprehensive, but they do not pretend to cover every aspect of care. As much as possible, the guidelines are evidence-based, and each recommendation has been given a subjective grade to indicate the strength of evidence that supports the recommendation. It is hoped that these guidelines will provide a framework for additional discussion and research that will improve the care of renal transplant recipients.

Concentration of Lp(a) and other apolipoproteins in predialysis, hemodialysis, chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and post-transplant patients

Serum levels of lipids, lipoprotein(a) Lp(a) and other apolipoproteins were determined in 47 predialysis patients, 40 hemodialysis (HD) patients, 39 chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients, 11 patients after kidney transplantation and 47 healthy subjects as reference group. The predialysis, HD, and CAPD patients had disturbances in the concentration of serum triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, apolipoprotein AI (apoAI), total apoCIII, apoCIII present in the particles without apoB (apoCIII non B), and Lp(a) and HDL-cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol/apoAI, apoAI/apoB, and apoAI/apoCIII ratios. Predialysis patients had significantly lower concentrations of HDL-cholesterol and total apoE levels than CAPD patients and total apoE level than HD patients. Moreover, both HD and CAPD patients had significantly increased levels of apoB containing apoE (apoB:E) and apoB containing apoCIII (apoB:CIII). The concentrations of serum TG, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, apoB, Lp(a) in CAPD patients were statistically higher than in HD patients. The patients after transplantation demonstrated normalization of lipid and lipoprotein parameters and lipoprotein ratios except serum levels of TG, total apoCIII, apoCIII non B and the apoAI/apoCIII ratio. We concluded that abnormal lipid and lipoprotein concentrations in patients with uremia may be the cause of their high risk of atherosclerosis, but posttransplant patients exhibited improved levels of serum lipids, Lp(a) and other lipoprotein parameters and lipoprotein composition, which could be an index of decreased atherogenic status.

Lipoprotein(a) plasma concentrations after renal transplantation: a prospective evaluation after 4 years of follow-up

The highly atherogenic lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is significantly elevated in patients with renal disease. It is discussed controversially whether Lp(a) concentrations decrease after renal transplantation and whether the mode of immunosuppressive therapy influences the Lp(a) concentrations. In a prospective study the Lp(a) concentrations before and on average 48 months after renal transplantation were measured in 145 patients. The determinants of the relative changes of Lp(a) concentrations were investigated in a multivariate analysis. Patients treated by CAPD showed a larger decrease of Lp(a) than hemodialysis patients, reflecting their markedly higher Lp(a) levels before transplantation. The relative decrease of Lp(a) was higher with increasing Lp(a) concentrations before transplantation in combination with an increasing molecular weight of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. That means that the relative decrease of Lp(a) is related to the Lp(a) concentration and the apo(a) size polymorphism. With increasing proteinuria and decreasing glomerular filtration rate, the relative decrease of Lp(a) became less pronounced. Neither prednisolone nor cyclosporine (CsA) had a significant impact on the Lp(a) concentration changes. Azathioprine (Aza) was the only immunosuppressive drug which had a dose-dependent influence on the relative decrease of Lp(a) levels. These data clearly demonstrate a decrease of Lp(a) following renal transplantation which is caused by the restoration of kidney function. The relative decrease is influenced by Aza but not by CsA or prednisolone.

LDL-unbound apolipoprotein(a) and carotid atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients

High lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] plasma concentrations, which are genetically determined by apo(a) size polymorphism, are directly associated with an increased risk for atherosclerosis. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), who show an enormous prevalence of cardiovascular disease, have elevated plasma concentrations of Lp(a). In recent studies we were able to show that apo(a) size polymorphism is a better predictor for carotid atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease in hemodialysis patients than concentrations of Lp(a) and other lipoproteins. Less than 5% of apo(a) in plasma exists in a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-unbound form. This "free" apo(a) consists mainly of disintegrated apo(a) molecules of different molecular weight, ranging from about 125 to 360 kDa. LDL-unbound apo(a) molecules are elevated in patients with ESRD. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate whether the LDL-unbound form of apo(a) contributes to the prediction of carotid atherosclerosis in a group of 153 hemodialysis patients. The absolute amount of LDL-unbound apo(a) showed a trend to increasing values with the degree of carotid atherosclerosis, but the correlation of Lp(a) plasma concentrations with atherosclerosis was more pronounced. In multivariate analysis the two variables were related to neither the presence nor the degree of atherosclerosis. Instead, the apo(a) phenotype took the place of Lp(a) and LDL-unbound apo(a). After adjustment for other variables, the odds ratio for carotid atherosclerosis in patients with a low molecular weight apo(a) phenotype was about 5 (p<0.01). This indicates a strong association between the apo(a) phenotype and the prevalence of carotid atherosclerosis. Finally, multivariate regression analysis revealed age, angina pectoris and the apo(a) phenotype as the only significant predictors of the degree of atherosclerosis in these patients. In summary, it seems that LDL-unbound apo(a) levels do not contribute to the prediction of carotid atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients. However, this does not mean that "free", mainly disintegrated, apo(a) has no atherogenic potential.

Growth hormone treatment increases circulating lipoprotein(a) in children with chronic renal failure

Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of death in chronic renal failure (CRF) patients managed by dialysis or kidney transplantation. Whilst the use of human growth hormone (hGH) is of established benefit in CRF children particularly in those with short stature, in the present study we assessed in CRF children the effect of hGH treatment on circulating lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a genetically determined cardiovascular risk factor. We studied 15 CRF children treated by dialysis or conventional therapy and after kidney transplantation. Overnight fasting blood samples were collected immediately before and after 6 months hGH treatment. In all but one of the children there was a significant increase in serum Lp(a) over the 6 month treatment period -(+)66.7% over the basal levels (range 14 to 180%). After the hGH treatment, in six children Lp(a) levels were elevated to above 300 mg/l, the cut-off level for increased coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. Concomitantly/children also had an increase in serum levels of IGF-I (+96.4%) and insulin (+85.8%). All children had an accelerated growth velocity during the treatment; there was no effect on serum creatinine. Our study shows that hGH treatment in CRF children, though beneficial in its growth promoting effects, increases the already characteristically high levels of serum Lp(a), a risk factor for CAD, and that serum Lp(a) monitoring during treatment with hGH may be useful in evaluating future cardiovascular risk.

Lipoprotein(a) in renal disease

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Several studies have described a correlation between high Lp(a) plasma levels and coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral atherosclerosis. In healthy individuals Lp(a) plasma concentrations are almost exclusively controlled by the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus on chromosome 6q2.6-q2.7. More than 30 alleles at this highly polymorphic gene locus determine a size polymorphism of apo(a). There exists an inverse correlation between the size (molecular weight) of apo(a) isoforms and Lp(a) plasma concentrations. Average Lp(a) levels are high in individuals with low molecular weight isoforms and low in those with high molecular weight isoforms. Mean Lp(a) plasma levels are elevated over controls in patients with renal disease. Patients with nephrotic syndrome exhibit excessively high Lp(a) plasma concentrations, which can be reduced with antiproteinuric treatment. The mechanism underlying this elevation is unclear, but the general increase in protein synthesis caused by the liver due to high urinary protein loss is a likely explanation. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) also have elevated Lp(a) levels. These are even higher in patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis than in those receiving hemodialysis. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations decrease to values observed in controls matched for apo(a) type following renal transplantation. This clearly demonstrates the nongenetic origin of Lp(a) elevation in ESRD. Both the increase in ESRD and the decrease following renal transplantation are apo(a) phenotype dependent. Only patients with high molecular weight phenotypes show the described changes in Lp(a) levels. In patients with low molecular weight types the Lp(a) concentrations remain unchanged during both phases of renal disease. As in the general population, Lp(a) is a risk factor for cardiovascular events in ESRD patients. In this patient group the apo(a) phenotype seems to be equally or better predictive of the degree of atherosclerosis than is Lp(a) concentration. Further prospective studies will be necessary to confirm these observations. Whether Lp(a) also plays a key role in the pathogenesis and progression of renal diseases needs further study. Controversial data on the role of the kidney in Lp(a) metabolism result from insufficient sample sizes of several studies. Due to the broad range and skewed distribution of Lp(a) plasma concentrations, large study groups must be investigated to obtain reliable results.

Lipoprotein(a) in health and disease

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] represents an LDL-like particle to which the Lp(a)-specific apolipoprotein(a) is linked via a disulfide bridge. It has gained considerable interest as a genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Several studies have described a correlation between elevated Lp(a) plasma levels and coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral atherosclerosis. In healthy individuals, Lp(a) plasma concentrations are almost exclusively controlled by the apo(a) gene locus on chromosome 6q2.6-q2.7. More than 30 alleles at this highly polymorphic gene locus determine a size polymorphism of apo(a). There exists an inverse correlation between the size (molecular weight) of apo(a) isoforms and Lp(a) plasma concentrations. The standardization of Lp(a) quantification is still an unresolved task due to the large particle size of Lp(a), the presence of two different apoproteins [apoB and apo(a)], and the large size polymorphism of apo(a) and its homology with plasminogen. A working group sponsored by the IFCC is currently establishing a stable reference standard for Lp(a) as well as a reference method for quantitative analysis. Aside from genetic reasons, abnormal Lp(a) plasma concentrations are observed as secondary to various diseases. Lp(a) plasma levels are elevated over controls in patients with nephrotic syndrome and patients with end-stage renal disease. Following renal transplantation, Lp(a) concentrations decrease to values observed in controls matched for apo(a) type. Controversial data on Lp(a) in diabetes mellitus result mainly from insufficient sample sizes of numerous studies. Large studies and those including apo(a) phenotype analysis came to the conclusion that Lp(a) levels are not or only moderately elevated in insulin-dependent patients. In noninsulin-dependent diabetics, Lp(a) is not elevated. Conflicting data also exist from studies in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Several case-control studies reported elevated Lp(a) levels in those patients, suggesting a role of the LDL-receptor pathway for degradation of Lp(a). However, recent turnover studies rejected that concept. Moreover, family studies also revealed data arguing against an influence of the LDL receptor for Lp(a) concentrations. Several rare diseases or disorders, such as LCAT- and LPL-deficiency as well as liver diseases, are associated with low plasma levels or lack of Lp(a).