Effect of exercise on lung transfer factor for CO in smokers

A new approach to detect early lung functional impairment in very light smokers

PURPOSE

The aim of our study is to investigate if lung carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) measured during effort is able to detect early respiratory functional impairment.

METHODS

We enrolled 25 very light smokers and 20 healthy non smokers. Subjects underwent plethysmography, DLCO (single breath technique) and calculated effective pulmonary blood flow (Qc) by rebreathing method. During exercise by cycle ergometer (duration 10±2min; recovery 11±3min) DLCO and Qc were calculated at 25% and 50% of theoretical maximum workload.

RESULTS

At baseline lung function and Qc did not differ between groups. DLCO and DLCO/Qc measured during exercise were significantly greater in non smokers (p<0.001); Qc was not statistically different. In very light smokers, DLCO, DLCO/Qc measured during exercise significantly correlated with the number of pack years (r=-0.60 p<0.001; r=-0.58 p<0.05; r=-0.55 p<0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In very light smokers there is lung function impairment and our data show that DLCO during exercise may reveal this underlying early damage.

Membrane diffusion and capillary blood volume in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

A reduced diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DCO) is common among patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and often persists for more than a year following successful pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE). To determine the relative contribution the pulmonary membrane diffusing capacity (DM) and pulmonary capillary blood volume (VC) make to the reduction in DCO, we measured both in 29 patients with CTEPH before and approximately 3 weeks after PTE. Mean preoperative DM was reduced in patients with CTEPH (28 mL min-1 mm Hg-1 vs 43 mL min-1 mm Hg-1 in control subjects; p < 0.001) and dropped significantly following PTE (21 mL min-1 mm Hg-1; p < 0.001). Mean preoperative VC was mildly reduced in the CTEPH group compared with healthy control subjects (57 vs 67 mL; p = 0.044) and did not rise following PTE (57 mL pre-PTE vs 54 mL post-PTE; p > 0.05) despite substantial reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure and increase in cardiac output after surgery. We conclude that the low DCO observed in patients with CTEPH before and after PTE is principally caused by a reduced DM and to a lesser extent by a low VC. The mechanisms responsible remain speculative but may reflect pathophysiologic changes in the pulmonary microcirculation caused by chronic pulmonary hypertension that did not improve in the postoperative period studied.