Pulse steroid therapy for children's severe alopecia areata?

Treatment Options for Alopecia Areata in Children and Adolescents

Alopecia areata (AA) lifetime incidence is around 2%, with many patients first experiencing symptoms during childhood. However, ritlecitinib is the only FDA-approved treatment for pediatric patients 12 years and older. This review outlines reported topical, injectable, and oral treatment options for pediatric patients with AA. Clinical studies were obtained via a PubMed search using the following search terms: alopecia areata, areata, universalis, or totalis and medication, therapy, treatment, drug, or management. Only studies with pediatric patients were included in this review. Commonly used therapies, including corticosteroids, methotrexate, and minoxidil, newer promising medications, such as Janus kinase inhibitors, and less frequently used topical and systemic treatments are included. A summary of the drug development pipeline and ongoing interventional clinical trials with pediatric patients is provided. Treatments demonstrate variable efficacy, and many patients require combination therapy for maximal response. More robust clinical data is needed for many of the medications reviewed in order to provide better care for these patients.

Pediatric pulse dose corticosteroid therapy dosing and administration in the treatment of alopecia areata: A review of literature

BACKGROUND

The use of pulse dose corticosteroid therapy (PDCT) in children for treatment of alopecia areata (AA) has been reported, but dosing regimens are not well-established. We aim to evaluate the available literature regarding the utilization and various dosing regimens of PDCT, as well as associated side effects, in the treatment of AA in children.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of studies describing the use of PDCT for the treatment of AA in children.

RESULTS

Eight relevant studies were identified, five of which administered the treatment intravenously (IV) and three of which administered the treatment orally. Protocols with IV administration included two studies which used IV dexamethasone at 1.5 mg/kg/day for 1-3 days monthly for a maximum of 12 cycles and three studies used IV methylprednisolone 8-30 mg/kg/day for 1-3 days monthly for a maximum of 3-10 cycles. The three protocols with oral administration included variable doses of prednisolone at variable intervals and cycle lengths, betamethasone and dexamethasone at a prednisolone equivalent of 5 mg/kg, and methylprednisolone 15 mg/kg for 3 days bimonthly for 12 cycles. In these studies, PDCT was generally well-tolerated and resulted in improvement of the AA.

CONCLUSION

PDCT was found to be well-tolerated with few serious side effects reported. It appears to be beneficial early in disease course, especially for those with multifocal AA.

Treatment of pediatric alopecia areata: A systematic review

Background:

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune, nonscarring hair loss disorder with slightly greater prevalence in children than adults. Various treatment modalities exist; however, their evidence in pediatric AA patients is lacking.

Objective:

To evaluate the evidence of current treatment modalities for pediatric AA.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic review on the PubMed database in October 2019 for all published articles involving patients <18 years old. Articles discussing AA treatment in pediatric patients were included, as were articles discussing both pediatric and adult patients, if data on individual pediatric patients were available.

Results:

Inclusion criteria were met by 122 total reports discussing 1032 patients. Reports consisted of 2 randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective comparative cohorts, 83 case series, 2 case-control studies, and 31 case reports. Included articles assessed the use of aloe, apremilast, anthralin, anti-interferon gamma antibodies, botulinum toxin, corticosteroids, contact immunotherapies, cryotherapy, hydroxychloroquine, hypnotherapy, imiquimod, Janus kinase inhibitors, laser and light therapy, methotrexate, minoxidil, phototherapy, psychotherapy, prostaglandin analogs, sulfasalazine, topical calcineurin inhibitors, topical nitrogen mustard, and ustekinumab.

Limitations:

English-only articles with full texts were used. Manuscripts with adult and pediatric data were only incorporated if individual-level data for pediatric patients were provided. No meta-analysis was performed.

Conclusion:

Topical corticosteroids are the preferred first-line treatment for pediatric AA, as they hold the highest level of evidence, followed by contact immunotherapy. More clinical trials and comparative studies are needed to further guide management of pediatric AA and to promote the potential use of pre-existing, low-cost, and novel therapies, including Janus kinase inhibitors.

Development of a scoring system to predict outcomes of i.v. corticosteroid pulse therapy in rapidly progressive alopecia areata adopting digital image analysis of hair recovery

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common autoimmune disease manifesting varying degrees of hair loss. Rapidly progressive AA (RP-AA) is a severe subtype of AA and often resistant to skin-directed treatments. i.v. corticosteroid pulse therapy has been applied for RP-AA; however, the treatment outcome can only become evaluable several months after the intervention, discomposing the patients. In this study, we attempted to develop a scoring system to predict treatment outcomes based on statistical correlations between newly identified predictors and the recovery rates calculated by digital image analysis. Thirty RP-AA patients (15 men and 15 women) who underwent pulse therapy and demonstrated total hair loss during the clinical course were included. The percentages of hair regrowth (%HR) at 6 months after the treatment were quantitatively calculated by image analysis software. The correlation between %HR and clinicopathological and immunological variables were statistically assessed. The analysis identified four confirmatory contributors including female sex (P = 0.015), absence of previous AA history (P = 0.02), lower peripheral blood eosinophil count (P = 0.02) and mild to moderate cell infiltration around the hair bulb (P = 0.034), together with a potential contributor, namely absence of atopic dermatitis in their medical history (P = 0.08). The scoring system was developed by double counting confirmatory variables and single counting a potential variable. Importantly, the scores obtained by this system demonstrated significant correlation with %HR (r = 0.61, P < 0.001). The usefulness of this scoring system was further validated by assessing additional 20 cases of RP-AA. When combined with a recently published algorithm for early detection of self-healing subset, the current scoring system may help strategize the therapeutic approach for RP-AA.

Combined intravenous pulse and topical corticosteroid therapy for severe alopecia areata in children: Comparison of two regimens

There is no universally accepted treatment for severe pediatric alopecia areata (AA). This prospective study comprised 73 patients (aged 1-18 years) with severe AA (>30% of scalp surface area): 37 received 1-day intravenous dexamethasone pulses (1-DP) and 36 received 3-day pulses (3-DP), monthly, for 6-12 months. Also, all patients applied topical clobetasol propionate under plastic wrap occlusion. Patients achieving >50% regrowth were considered good responders (GR). All patients reached short term, while 65/73 were available for the long-term follow-up (mean 33.3 ± 15.3 vs. 27.7 ± 14.3 months, 1-DP and 3-DP, respectively). Relapses during therapy were more frequent in 1-DP group. 3-DP patients were more frequently GR in comparison with 1-DP. 3-DP patients with disease duration <6 months had better outcomes. Patients without Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT) had 9.8-fold higher chance of being GR in comparison with HT patients. The best results were achieved in AA plurifocalis (AAP). No patient had severe short-term side-effects. At the long-term follow-up, 67% of 3-DP patients had stable results. Only 14.2% AAP patients experienced relapses. Patients had no long-term side-effects. 3-DP were more efficacious than 1-DP. Short disease duration and no HT were good prognostic factors. 3-DP protocol is well-tolerated, with beneficial effects and long-lasting results in severe pediatric AA.

Current Treatments for Alopecia Areata

Selection of a therapy for a patient with alopecia areata (AA) is frequently based on the age of the patient, disease extent, perhaps disease duration, patient expectations, cost of therapy in terms of time commitment, and financial resources, as well as the results of screening laboratory studies that rule out the presence of other co-morbidities such as anemia, low iron stores, thyroid abnormalities, low vitamin D, or other autoimmune diseases. Although there is currently no cure for AA and no universally proven therapy that induces and sustains remission, many therapies are available which can be of benefit to both affected children and adults. Before selecting a treatment for patients with extensive long-standing AA, a scalp biopsy may provide useful information about the degree of inflammation and follicle differentiation. Recent clinical and translational research observations with the systemic Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and interleukin-2 (IL-2) have excited the clinical and AA patient communities and have led to clinical trials, as well as to the off-label use of these more expensive and targeted systemic therapies.

High Relapse Rates Despite Early Intervention with Intravenous Methylprednisolone Pulse Therapy for Severe Childhood Alopecia Areata

BACKGROUND

Previous data suggest that early application of intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy (IV-MPPT) may improve the disease course of alopecia areata. The objective of this study was to investigate the outcome of IV-MPPT in severe childhood alopecia areata, predominantly with short disease duration.

METHODS

Eighteen children (10 girls, 8 boys) younger than 17 years old (median age 7.7 yrs, range 2.1-16.5 yrs) treated with IV-MPPT for severe childhood alopecia areata in a referral center for pediatric dermatology over 3 years (median disease duration 4 mos, range 1-12 mos) were retrospectively evaluated. Five patients had alopecia areata totalis or universalis and 13 had alopecia multilocularis. The median scalp area affected by alopecia was 60% (range 30%-100%). All patients underwent two or three cycles of IV-MPPT at monthly intervals (maximum 500 mg/day on three consecutive days).

RESULTS

Within 7 months after the last IV-MPPT session, 10 of 18 children had good response (≥75% of hair regrowth), with eight showing improvement within the first 4 months. Of the remaining eight patients, one had moderate response (50%-74% regrowth), three had poor response (1%-49% regrowth), and four (all with alopecia areata universalis or totalis) had no response. Seven of the initial 10 good responders experienced relapses, with marked hair loss after the last IV-MPPT session. The estimated median time to relapse was 8 months (95% confidence interval 7, 9 mos).

CONCLUSION

IV-MPPT, even early in the course of disease, did not affect long-term outcome of alopecia areata in our group of severely affected patients.

Detailed clinicopathological characterization of progressive alopecia areata patients treated with i.v. corticosteroid pulse therapy toward optimization of inclusion criteria

The management of progressive alopecia areata (AA) is often challenging. Recently, i.v. corticosteroid pulse therapy has been reported to be effective for acute and severe AA, however, inclusion criteria have not been sufficiently precise, leaving a chance that its efficacy could be further improved by optimizing therapeutic indications. In our attempts to delineate the factors that correlate with favorable outcomes, we minutely evaluated the clinicopathological findings and the prognoses of single-round steroid pulse-treated progressive AA cases with full sets of image and pathology records during the course. Almost complete hair regrowth has been achieved and maintained up to 2 years in five out of seven AA patients with varying degrees of clinical severity. Interestingly, the worst clinical presentation observed during the course correlated with the size of the area where hairs with dystrophic roots were pulled rather than the extent of visible hair loss on the first visit. Dermoscopy detected disease spread but contributed little in assessing prognoses. Dense perifollicular cell infiltration was detected in all cases treated within 4 weeks of onset and those treated later but with excellent response. Importantly, the cases with poor or incomplete hair regrowth were treated 6-8 weeks of onset and showed moderate inflammatory change with high telogen conversion rate. These findings mandate global dermoscopy and hair pull test for judging the treatment indication and suggest that early administration of high-dose corticosteroid, ideally within 4 weeks of onset, enable efficient suppression of active inflammation and maximize the effectiveness of the remedy.

Medium-dose prednisolone pulse therapy in alopecia areata

BACKGROUND

Although the exact etiology of alopecia areata is still unknown, systemic prednisolone treatment seem to be effective in early stages but significant side effects may occur leading to discontinuation of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of efficacy and saftety of a short-term medium-dose pulse prednisolone treatment in alopecia areata.

RESULTS

84% of the patients with multifocal alopecia areata markedly improved after the completion of the three courses. A patient with the ophiasis type only responded after the third course, but relapsed 7 months later. The patients with alopecia areata totalis and universalis did not respond to the treatment. No major side effects were observed.

METHODS

Monocenter prospective study of intravenous 100 mg intravenous prednisolone pulse therapy on 3 consecutive days at 1-month-intervals for three courses in 23 patients with active alopecia areata rapidly evolving and/or resistant to topical therapies and no contraindication for systemic steroids.

CONCLUSION

A series of three monthly courses of medium-dose prednisolone pulse therapy is effective and well tolerated in most patients with active, multifocal alopecia areata. The results are rather disappointing in patients with alopecia areara totalis/universalis.

High-dose intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy in alopecia areata: own experience compared with the literature

BACKGROUND

Seven prospective studies including 193 patients have been published on high-dose intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy in alopecia areata (AA). We compare these data with a retrospective analysis of our own consecutive patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1998 and 2002,25 patients with severe AA were treated at the Department of Dermatology, University of Bern, with infusions of 500 mg methylprednisolone on 3 consecutive days. In addition to the inpatient records, in 2004 all patients were followed up by a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Four of 10 patients with multifocal AA and 3 of 9 patients with ophiasis-type AA had full re-growth of hair, whereas all 6 patients with AA totalis/universalis failed to respond.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy may be helpful in the treatment of multifocal and ophiasis-type AA. Patients with an initial episode of short duration have better chances for success.

Pulse corticosteroid therapy for alopecia areata: study of 139 patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

Recent reports of pulse corticosteroid therapy for alopecia areata (AA) show its efficacy for patients with a history of < or = 1 year but not for recalcitrant cases or alopecia totalis/universalis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pulse corticosteroid therapy for recent-onset AA patients.

METHOD

A total of 139 severe AA patients aged >15 years were included in this study. The duration from the onset of active hair loss was within 12 months for 125 (89.9%) of those patients.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 72.7% had hair loss on > 50% of their scalp area. Among the recent-onset group (duration of AA < or = 6 months), 59.4% were good responders (> 75% regrowth of alopecia lesions), while 15.8% with > 6 months duration showed a good response. Recent-onset AA patients with less severe disease (< or = 50% hair loss) responded at a rate of 88.0%, but only 21.4% of recent-onset patients with 100% hair loss responded. No serious adverse effects were observed.

High-dose prednisolone and psoralen ultraviolet A combination therapy in 36 patients with vitiligo

It is well known that systemic corticosteroids arrest the progress of vitiligo and lead to repigmentation, but they may produce unacceptable side-effects. The use of high-dose prednisolone therapy to minimize the side-effects of systemic steroids has been reported, but there have been no reports on the effectiveness of such treatment combined with phototherapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with intravenous prednisolone and psoralen ultraviolet A (PUVA). In 36 patients with vitiligo, intravenous methylprednisolone for 3 days was followed by PUVA twice weekly. After 6 months, vitiligo lesions on the face were reduced in size by 57.5%, on the upper extremities by 34.5%, on the trunk by 30.4% and on the lower extremities by 26.3%. Overall, improvement was seen in 13 patients (36.1%), with >50% repigmentation. Side-effects were mild and transient. We conclude that combination treatment of high-dose prednisolone therapy and PUVA may represent a highly effective therapeutic option for generalized vitiligo.

Effect of thioredoxin reductase 1 on glucocorticoid receptor activity in human outer root sheath cells

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common disease of patchy hair loss on the scalp that can progress to cover the entire scalp and eventually the entire body. Intralesional injection of corticosteroids is the first-line therapy for adult patients, however some patients do not respond to glucocorticoid treatment effectively. To delineate the molecular mechanism underlying glucocorticoid insensitivity, we examined the expression of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1). In some case of glucocorticoid-resistant AA patients, the expression of TrxR1 was decreased in outer root sheath (ORS). We then investigated the effect of TrxR1 on GR activity using recombinant adenoviruses. Overexpression of TrxR1 markedly increased GR activity in ORS cells cultured in vitro. In addition, TrxR1 protected GR activity against H(2)O(2). Finally, TrxR1-enhanced GR activity was significantly inhibited by the overexpression of dominant negative form of Trx (Trx(C32S/C35S)). These results suggest that decreased TrxR1 may be one putative cause for glucocorticoid resistance in AA, through the impact on intracellular redox system.

Determination of the sildenafil effect on alopecia areata in childhood: An open-pilot comparison study

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata is an immunologically mediated cessation of hair growth primarily involving, but not limited to, the scalp. The treatment of alopecia areata involves promotion of hair growth (for instance with topical minoxidil application), immunosuppression (intralesional or systemic steroid therapy, phototherapy) or immunomodulation (anthralin, dinitrochlorobenzene, diphenylcyclopropenone, squaric acid dibutylester). All these medications have some disadvantages and difficulties for the treatment of children with alopecia areata.

OBJECTIVE

To use an open-pilot study to assess the efficacy of topical 1% sildenafil in children diagnosed with alopecia areata.

METHODS

Eight patients with (25% of scalp surface area involvement) alopecia areata who were refractory to previous topical treatments applied 1% sildenafil twice daily for 3 months. All the patients completed the study.

RESULTS

Two patients experienced vellus-type hair growth and one patient had terminal hair growth. However, these outcomes were accepted as the spontaneous regression of the disease.

CONCLUSION

We cannot recommend the use of topical 1% sildenafil for the treatment of alopecia areata without further evidence of its therapeutic benefit.

Alopecia Areata: Autoimmunity—The Evidence Is Compelling

There is strong evidence indicating that alopecia areata is a tissue-specific, autoimmune disease. Hair loss is associated with a perifollicular lymphocytic infiltrate made up primarily of CD4+ cells, along with a CD8+ intrafollicular infiltrate. Evidence of immune activation includes expression of HLA-DR; HLA-A,B,C; and ICAM-1 on the follicular epithelium. It is likely that the follicular expression of HLA-DR and ICAM-1 is induced by interferon-gamma produced by T cells. Antibodies to follicular epithelium are often present, but their significance is not known. Lesional scalp from alopecia areata patients grafted onto nude mice regrows hair coincident with a loss of infiltrating lymphocytes from the graft. Hair loss can be transferred to human scalp explants on SCID mice by injection of lesional T cells. It is necessary to activate the T cells by culture with follicular autoantigens. Melanocyte-associated antigens are also capable of activating T cells to induce hair loss, suggesting that they are capable of functioning as autoantigens for alopecia areata. Parallel evidence in rodent models of spontaneous alopecia areata also strongly supports a role for T cells in the pathogenesis of this condition.

Pulse glucocorticoids

High-dose intravenous (i.v.) methylprednisolone has been used therapeutically in a number of medical fields to avoid the complications and side effects of long-term glucocorticoid (GC) therapy and because of the perception that high-dose i.v. methylprednisolone may have "special" therapeutic effects. It is possible that aggressive early therapy with GCs allows for a more rapid taper of GCs and therefore prevents some of the dose-related side effects associated with long-term use. Some of the neurologic and rheumatologic literature related to multiple sclerosis and lupus nephritis suggest that i.v. methylprednisolone has therapeutic effects that are different from those of conventional doses of oral prednisone. There is still considerable debate about this in nondermatologic fields, and extrapolation of the role of pulse i.v. methylprednisolone to dermatologic disease, where trials are lacking, is difficult. Given this subset of possible candidates of this therapy as suggested by anecdotal reports, there is at least a rationale for considering the use of this modality in a subset of patients.