1
|
Gutierrez AM, Robinson JO, Raesz-Martinez R, Canfield I, Majumder MA, Scollon S, Desrosiers LR, Hsu RL, Allen-Rhoades W, Parsons DW, Plon SE, McGuire AL, Malek J. Views of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Oncologists Toward Patients' Participation in Genomic Research. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2023; 12:773-781. [PMID: 36595372 PMCID: PMC10611971 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: With increased use of genomic testing in cancer research and clinical care, it is important to understand the perspectives and decision-making preferences of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer and their treating oncologists. Methods: We conducted an interview substudy of the BASIC3 Study, which enrolled newly diagnosed cancer patients <18 years of age with assent. Of 32 young adults (YAs) with cancer who reached the age of majority (AOM; 18 years) while on study, 12 were successfully approached and all consented to study continuation at AOM. Of those, seven completed an interview. Patients' oncologists, who enrolled and participated in return of clinical genomic results, were also interviewed (n = 12). Interviews were transcribed, deidentified, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: YAs cited the possibility of helping others and advancing science as major reasons for their assent to initial study enrollment and their willingness to consent at AOM. YAs thought obtaining informed consent from research participants for study continuation at AOM was a good idea in case they changed their minds or wanted to make their own decisions, and to keep them aware of study activities. There was diversity in what YAs understood and learned from genomic testing: some recalled specific findings, while some remembered minimal information about their results. Oncologists varied in their assessment of adolescents' engagement with the study and understanding of their results. Conclusion: Given the different ways AYAs engage with genomic information, careful assessment of AYAs' diverse communication and decision-making preferences is needed to tailor interactions accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda M. Gutierrez
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jill O. Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robin Raesz-Martinez
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Isabel Canfield
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mary A. Majumder
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah Scollon
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren R. Desrosiers
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rebecca L. Hsu
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wendy Allen-Rhoades
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - D. Williams Parsons
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sharon E. Plon
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amy L. McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Janet Malek
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kong MC, Shih J, Tarling TE, Kong CC, van Tassel H, Dittrick M, Vercauteren SM. Biobank Awareness Changes Opinions of Adolescents and Parents on Participation and Practices. Biopreserv Biobank 2021; 20:38-47. [PMID: 34319789 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2020.0157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate barriers and facilitators of pediatric biobank participation, we studied whether increased awareness of participants about pediatric biobanking changes their opinions on biobanking practices and their willingness to participate in biobanks. Adolescents (14-18 years) in public schools and their parents were invited to participate in a survey either with or without viewing educational material about biobanking before completing the survey. Questions included willingness to donate, consenting practices and use of specimens. Surveys were administered. Nonparametric statistical tests (Mann-Whitney U) were used to test the significance of differences in Likert scale responses between participant groups. A total of 545 participants (219 adolescent and 176 parents with prior awareness about biobanking vs. 106 adolescents and 44 parents without) completed the survey. Participants who had participated in an educational session were more willing to donate compared to participants without this session under three different conditions: a left-over sample, an extra sample at the time of a medical procedure, and an extra procedure. Adolescents without prior awareness were significantly more willing to donate compared to their parents. Parents perceived the need for reconsent more important than children, although it was less important to educated parents versus noneducated parents. Age of assent was lower in the groups with prior awareness and ongoing use of specimens without reconsent was more permissible to these participants. In conclusion, prior awareness of biobanks may facilitate pediatric biobank participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa C Kong
- Department of Medicine and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - James Shih
- Department of Medicine and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Tamsin E Tarling
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Cynthia C Kong
- Department of Medicine and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Heather van Tassel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Michelle Dittrick
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Suzanne M Vercauteren
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Savich RD, Tigges BB, Rios LI, McCloskey J, Tollestrup K, Annett RD. Willingness of women to participate in obstetrical and pediatric research involving biobanks. J Community Genet 2019; 11:215-223. [PMID: 31782046 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-019-00446-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Use of biobanks for future genetic/genomic testing has increased. Biospecimens are increasingly being collected from infants/children; however, little is known about attitudes towards collection of biospecimens from postpartum women and their child. Using a hypothetical consent, this study investigated willingness to participate and attitudes, beliefs, and concerns related to consent materials requesting the biobanking genetic samples. A cross-sectional mixed methods design included women who reviewed a hypothetical consent related to biobanking genetic samples. Women were asked about their willingness to participate, followed by a focus group about biobanks and genetic/genomic testing. Post-focus group questionnaires assessed willingness to participate, the influence of study characteristics, and attitudes about genetic testing. Women (N = 37) were 29.0± 7.3 years of age (range 19-44); 51% had children and 28% were currently pregnant. A total of 46% were Hispanic (H), 38% were White non-Hispanic (WNH), and 16% were Native American (NA). Seventy-six percent (28/37) initially indicated that they would participate in the hypothetical study. Race and ethnicity impacted whether women would participate. Fewer NA women indicated that they would participate compared with H women and with WNH women (p < 0.02). Age, pregnancy status, having children, education level, insurance status, and income had no impact on participation decision and willingness to biobank specimens. NA and H women indicated that they were less likely than WNH women to agree to participate in a long-term biobank study. Given the importance of determining the genetic influence of health and disease, it is critical to attend to the questions and concerns of minority women regarding genetic studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renate D Savich
- Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS, 39216-4505, USA
| | - Beth B Tigges
- College of Nursing, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | | | - Joanne McCloskey
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Kristine Tollestrup
- College of Population Health, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Robert D Annett
- Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS, 39216-4505, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Manhas KP, Dodd SX, Page S, Letourneau N, Adair CE, Cui X, Tough SC. Sharing longitudinal, non-biological birth cohort data: a cross-sectional analysis of parent consent preferences. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18:97. [PMID: 30419910 PMCID: PMC6233367 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0683-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mandates abound to share publicly-funded research data for reuse, while data platforms continue to emerge to facilitate such reuse. Birth cohorts (BC) involve longitudinal designs, significant sample sizes and rich and deep datasets. Data sharing benefits include more analyses, greater research complexity, increased opportunities for collaboration, amplification of public contributions, and reduced respondent burdens. Sharing BC data involves significant challenges including consent, privacy, access policies, communication, and vulnerability of the child. Research on these issues is available for biological data, but these findings may not extend to BC data. We lack consensus on how best to approach these challenges in consent, privacy, communication and autonomy when sharing BC data. We require more stakeholder engagement to understand perspectives and generate consensus. METHODS Parents participating in longitudinal birth cohorts completed a web-based survey investigating consent preferences for sharing their, and their child's, non-biological research data. Results from a previous qualitative inquiry informed survey development, and cognitive interviewing methods (n = 9) were used to improve the question quality and comprehension. Recruitment was via personalized email, with email and phone reminders during the 14-day window for survey completion. RESULTS Three hundred and forty-six of 569 parents completed the survey in September 2014 (60.8%). Participants preferred consent processes for data sharing in future independent research that were less-active (i.e. no consent or opt-out). Parents' consent preferences are associated with their communication preferences. Twenty percent (20.2%) of parents generally agreed that their child should provide consent to continue participating in research at age 12, while 25.6% felt decision-making on sharing non-biological research data should begin at age 18. CONCLUSIONS These finding reflect the parenting population's preference for less project-specific permission when research data is non-biological and de-identified and when governance practices are highly detailed and rigourous. Parents recognize that children should become involved in consent for secondary data use, but there is variability regarding when and how involvement occurs. These findings emphasize governance processes and participant notification rather than project-specific consent for secondary use of de-identified, non-biological data. Ultimately, parents prefer general consent processes for sharing de-identified, non-biological research data with ultimate involvement of the child.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran Pohar Manhas
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Stacey Page
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Carol E. Adair
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Xinjie Cui
- PolicyWise for Children & Families, Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - Suzanne C. Tough
- PolicyWise for Children & Families, Calgary, Canada
- Pediatrics & Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Paquette ED, Derrington SF, Shukla A, Sinha N, Oswald S, Sorce L, Michelson KN. Biobanking in the Pediatric Critical Care Setting: Adolescent/Young Adult Perspectives. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018; 13:391-401. [PMID: 29900801 PMCID: PMC6146019 DOI: 10.1177/1556264618782231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Biorepository research in children raises numerous ethical questions that are heightened in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) setting. We conducted a cross-sectional, interview-based study of 20 adolescent/young adult (A/YA) PICU patients and 75 parents of PICU patients to elucidate perspectives on biorepository research. A/YAs had a positive attitude toward biobanking. In young adults, comprehension was higher for knowledge of a choice to withdraw and participate in the research and lower for purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits of participation. All but one A/YA wanted to have a say in whether their samples would be used. Parent views on child assent were mixed; 55% of parents favored child involvement in decisions. Efforts should be made to improve comprehension by A/YAs and involvement of A/YAs in decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin D Paquette
- 1 Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- 2 Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sabrina F Derrington
- 1 Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- 2 Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Avani Shukla
- 2 Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Neha Sinha
- 3 Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | | | - Lauren Sorce
- 2 Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kelly N Michelson
- 1 Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- 2 Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fisher CB, Layman DM. Genomics, Big Data, and Broad Consent: a New Ethics Frontier for Prevention Science. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2018; 19:871-879. [PMID: 30145751 PMCID: PMC6182378 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-018-0944-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Emerging technologies for analyzing biospecimens have led to advances in understanding the interacting role of genetics and environment on development and individual responsivity to prevention and intervention programs. The scientific study of gene-environment influences has also benefited from the growth of Big Data tools that allow linking genomic data to health, educational, and other information stored in large integrated datasets. These advances have created a new frontier of ethical challenges for scientists as they collect, store, or engage in secondary use of potentially identifiable information and biospecimens. To address challenges arising from technological advances and the expanding contexts in which potentially identifiable information and biospecimens are collected and stored, the Office of Human Research Protections has revised federal regulations for the protection of human subjects. The revised regulations create a new format, content, and transparency requirements for informed consent, including a new mechanism known as broad consent. Broad consent offers participants a range of choices regarding consent for the storage and future use of their personally identifiable data. These regulations have important implications for how prevention scientists and oversight boards acquire participant consent for the collection, storage, and future use of their data by other investigators for scientific purposes significantly different from the original study. This article describes regulatory changes and challenges affecting traditional informed consent for prevention research, followed by a description of the rationale and requirements for obtaining broad consent, and concludes with a discussion of future challenges involving ongoing transparency and protections for participants and their communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia B Fisher
- Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Dealy Hall 441, East Fordham Road, Bronx, NY, 10458, USA.
| | - Deborah M Layman
- Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Dealy Hall 441, East Fordham Road, Bronx, NY, 10458, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ogunrin O, Woolfall K, Gabbay M, Frith L. Relative solidarity: Conceptualising communal participation in genomic research among potential research participants in a developing Sub-Saharan African setting. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0195171. [PMID: 29621313 PMCID: PMC5886479 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective As genomic research gathers momentum in sub-Saharan Africa, it has become increasingly important to understand the reasons why individuals wish to participate in this kind of medical research. Against the background of communitarianism conceived as typical of African communities, it is often suggested that individuals consent to participate on the grounds of solidarity and to further the common good. In this paper, we seek to explore this contention by presenting data from focus groups with potential research participants about what would influence their decisions to participate in genomic research. Methods and results These focus groups were conducted as part of a larger qualitative study with a purposively selected group of participants from a community situated in south west Nigeria. We conducted fifteen focus group sessions comprising 50 participants organized by age and sex, namely: 1) adult (>30 years) males, 2) adult females, 3) youth (18–30 years) males, and 4) youth females. A mixed age-group was conducted to probe different views between the age groups. There was discordance and clear division between the adults and youths regarding the decision to participate in genomic research based on commitment to communal values. Adults based their decision to participate on altruism and furthering the common good while youths based their decisions on personal benefits and preferences and also took into account the views and welfare of family members and neighbours. Conclusions This discordance suggests a ‘generational shift’ and we advance a model of ‘relative solidarity’ among the youths, which is different from the communal solidarity model typical of African communitarianism. Our findings suggest the need for a closer look at strategies for implementation of community engagement and informed consent in genomic research in this region, and we recommend further studies to explore this emerging trend.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olubunmi Ogunrin
- Department of Medicine, University of Benin, PMB, Benin City, Nigeria
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Kerry Woolfall
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Gabbay
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Frith
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Murad AM, Myers MF, Thompson SD, Fisher R, Antommaria AHM. A qualitative study of adolescents' understanding of biobanks and their attitudes toward participation, re-contact, and data sharing. Am J Med Genet A 2017; 173:930-937. [PMID: 28328120 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2016] [Revised: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 12/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
While biobanks have become more prevalent, little is known about adolescents' views of key governance issues. We conducted semi-structured interviews with adolescents between 15 and 17 years old to solicit their views. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. Two investigators coded the transcripts and resolved any discrepancies through consensus. We conducted 18 interviews before reaching data saturation. Four participants (22%) had previously heard of a biobank. Many participants had misunderstandings about biobanks, some of which persisted after education. Participants believed that enrolling in a biobank would benefit others through scientific research. Many study participants were unable to identify risks of biobank participation. Thirteen participants (72%) were willing to enroll in a biobank and only one (6%) initially was not. Participants believed that if they were unable to provide assent when enrolled, then they should be re-contacted at the age of majority and their data should not be shared until that time. Participants emphasized the importance of being aware of their enrollment and the possibility of disagreeing with their parents. Participants' misunderstanding of biobanks suggests that assent may not be adequately informed without additional education. While adolescents had positive attitudes toward biobanks, they emphasized the importance of awareness of and involvement in the decision to enroll.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea M Murad
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.,University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Melanie F Myers
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.,University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Susan D Thompson
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.,Center for Autoimmune and Genomics Etiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Rachel Fisher
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.,University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Armand H Matheny Antommaria
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.,Ethics Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kuemmerle-Deschner JB, Hansmann S, Wulffraat NM, Vastert SJ, Hens K, Anton J, Avcin T, Martini A, Koné-Paut I, Uziel Y, Ravelli A, Wouters C, Shaw D, Özen S, Eikelberg A, Prakken BJ, Ruperto N, Horneff G, Constantin T, Beresford MW, Sikken M, Foster HE, Haug I, Schuller S, Jägle C, Benseler SM. Recommendations for collaborative paediatric research including biobanking in Europe: a Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 77:319-327. [PMID: 29021237 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2017] [Revised: 08/19/2017] [Accepted: 09/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Innovative research in childhood rheumatic diseases mandates international collaborations. However, researchers struggle with significant regulatory heterogeneity; an enabling European Union (EU)-wide framework is missing. The aims of the study were to systematically review the evidence for best practice and to establish recommendations for collaborative research. The Paediatric Rheumatology European Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) project enabled a scoping review and expert discussion, which then informed the systematic literature review. Published evidence was synthesised; recommendations were drafted. An iterative review process and consultations with Ethics Committees and European experts for ethical and legal aspects of paediatric research refined the recommendations. SHARE experts and patient representatives vetted the proposed recommendations at a consensus meeting using Nominal Group Technique. Agreement of 80% was mandatory for inclusion. The systematic literature review returned 1319 records. A total of 223 full-text publications plus 22 international normative documents were reviewed; 85 publications and 16 normative documents were included. A total of 21 recommendations were established including general principles (1-3), ethics (4-7), paediatric principles (8 and 9), consent to paediatric research (10-14), paediatric databank and biobank (15 and 16), sharing of data and samples (17-19), and commercialisation and third parties (20 and 21). The refined recommendations resulted in an agreement of >80% for all recommendations. The SHARE initiative established the first recommendations for Paediatric Rheumatology collaborative research across borders in Europe. These provide strong support for an urgently needed European framework and evidence-based guidance for its implementation. Such changes will promote research in children with rheumatic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sandra Hansmann
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nico M Wulffraat
- Paediatric Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan J Vastert
- Paediatric Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kristien Hens
- Department of Philosophy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jordi Anton
- Pediatric Rheumatology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tadej Avcin
- Departments of Allergy, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Genoa, Gaslini Children's Hospital, G. Gaslini Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
| | - Isabelle Koné-Paut
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology and Haematology, CEREMAI, GHU Paris-Sud - Hôpital de Bicêtre, APHP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Yosef Uziel
- Pediatric Rheumatology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meir Medical Center, Kfar-Saba, Kfar Saba, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Angelo Ravelli
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Genoa, Gaslini Children's Hospital, G. Gaslini Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
| | - Carine Wouters
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Laboratory Paediatric Immunology, UZ Leuven Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Shaw
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, CAPHRI Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Seza Özen
- Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Andreas Eikelberg
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Berent J Prakken
- Paediatric Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolino Ruperto
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Genoa, Gaslini Children's Hospital, G. Gaslini Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gerd Horneff
- Department of General Pediatrics, Asklepios Clinic Sankt Augustin, Sankt Augustin, Germany
| | - Tamas Constantin
- Reumatológia, Immunológia, Gyermekgyógyászati Klinika, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Michael W Beresford
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Marijn Sikken
- JIA Patient Council, Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helen E Foster
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children's Hospital, Institute of Cellular Medicine Musculoskeletal Research Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Iris Haug
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sabrina Schuller
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christine Jägle
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Susanne M Benseler
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kranendonk EJ, Hennekam RC, Ploem MC. Paediatric biobanking: Dutch experts reflecting on appropriate legal standards for practice. Eur J Pediatr 2017; 176:75-82. [PMID: 27866271 PMCID: PMC5219008 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-016-2810-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Revised: 11/04/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Large sets of data and human specimens, such as blood, tumour tissue and DNA, are deposited in biobanks for research purposes, preferably for long periods of time and with broadly defined research aims. Our research focuses on the retention of data and biological materials obtained from children. However important such paediatric biobanks may be, the privacy interests of the children involved and the related risks may not be ignored. The privacy issues arising from paediatric biobanks are the central focus of this article. We first review the international regulations that apply to biobanks and then summarise viewpoints expressed by experts in a round-table discussion. We confine ourselves here to two normative questions: (1) How much control should children's parents or legal representatives, and later the children themselves, have over the stored materials and data? (2) What should be done if research findings emerge that have serious implications for a child's health? CONCLUSION On the basis of international legal standards and the views of experts, involved in paediatric biobanking, we argue that biological material of children may only be stored in a biobank for scientific purposes if parents provide their explicit consent, the child is re-contacted at 16 or 18 years of age to reconsider storage and use of its material, and the biobank maintains a limited policy in disclosure of individual research findings to the child's parents. What is Known: • Increasingly, biological material of children is stored in biobanks for research purposes. • Clear standards on the conditions under which children's cells or tissues may be stored and used are lacking. What is New: • According to experts, storage and use of children's materials should only be allowed if performed in accordance with appropriate consent procedures and feedback policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elcke J. Kranendonk
- Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health AMC, Room J2-210, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raoul C. Hennekam
- Department of Pediatrics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. Corrette Ploem
- Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kranendonk EJ, Ploem MC, Hennekam RCM. Regulating biobanking with children's tissue: a legal analysis and the experts' view. Eur J Hum Genet 2016; 24:30-6. [PMID: 25873015 PMCID: PMC4795222 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.59] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2014] [Revised: 02/20/2015] [Accepted: 02/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Many current paediatric studies concern relationships between genes and environment and discuss aetiology, treatment and prevention of Mendelian and multifactorial diseases. Many of these studies depend on collection and long-term storage of data and biological material from affected children in biobanks. Stored material is a source of personal information of the donor and his family and could be used in an undesirable context, potentially leading to discrimination and interfering with a child's right to an open future. Here, we address the normative framework regarding biobanking with residual tissue of children, protecting the privacy interests of young biobank donors (0-12 years). We analyse relevant legal documents concerning storage and use of children's material for research purposes. We explore the views of 17 Dutch experts involved in paediatric biobank research and focus on informed consent for donation of leftover tissue as well as disclosure of individual research findings resulting from biobank research. The results of this analysis show that experts have no clear consensus about the appropriate rules for storage of and research with children's material in biobanks. Development of a framework that provides a fair balance between fundamental paediatric research and privacy protection is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elcke J Kranendonk
- Department of Public Health, AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Corrette Ploem
- Department of Public Health, AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raoul C M Hennekam
- Departments of Paediatrics and Translational Genetics, AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ethics of children’s participation in a Saudi biobank: an exploratory survey. Genet Med 2015; 18:806-13. [DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2015] [Accepted: 10/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
13
|
Swartling U, Helgesson G, Ludvigsson J, Hansson MG, Nordgren A. Children's Views on Long-Term Screening for Type 1 Diabetes. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2015; 9:1-9. [PMID: 25747292 DOI: 10.1177/1556264614544456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
There are an increasing number of medical research studies involving children, including many long-term birth cohort studies. Involving children raises many issues, and little is known about children's own views. This study explored children's views (N = 5,851) on participation in a long-term screening study for type 1 diabetes. The results show that children 10 to 13 years of age have in general a positive attitude to pediatric research and emphasized trust in researchers. The children stressed the importance to receive information and to be involved in decisions. The children also reported feeling concerned about blood sampling and disease risk. Researchers involved in long-term pediatric research need to address these issues to promote involvement and decrease worry.
Collapse
|
14
|
Manhas KP, Page S, Dodd SX, Letourneau N, Ambrose A, Cui X, Tough SC. Parent perspectives on privacy and governance for a pediatric repository of non-biological, research data. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2015; 10:88-99. [PMID: 25742670 DOI: 10.1177/1556264614564970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Research data repositories (RDRs) are data storage entities where data can be submitted, stored, and subsequently accessed for purposes beyond the original intent. There is little information relating to non-biological RDRs, nor considerations regarding pediatric data storage and re-use. We examined parent perspectives on pediatric, non-biological RDRs. Qualitative, descriptive methods including both interviews and focus groups were used. Purposive sampling of adult participants in two provincial birth cohorts yielded 19 interviewees and 18 focus group participants (4 groups). Transcripts were analyzed by thematic content analysis. Parent research participants strongly supported the sharing of their own, and their child's, non-biological research data. Four themes emerged: that altruism has limits, that participants have ongoing privacy concerns, that some participants need the assurance of congruent values between themselves and researchers/research questions, and that opinions diverge for some governance issues. The establishment of RDRs is important and maximizes participants', researchers', and funders' investments. Participants as data donors have concerns relating to privacy, relationships, and governance that must be considered in RDR development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran P Manhas
- Alberta Centre for Child, Family & Community Research, Calgary, Canada University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Xinjie Cui
- Alberta Centre for Child, Family & Community Research, Calgary, Canada
| | - Suzanne C Tough
- Alberta Centre for Child, Family & Community Research, Calgary, Canada University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tinker SC, Gilboa S, Reefhuis J, Jenkins MM, Schaeffer M, Moore CA. Challenges in Studying Modifiable Risk Factors for Birth Defects. CURR EPIDEMIOL REP 2015; 2:23-30. [PMID: 26236577 PMCID: PMC4516719 DOI: 10.1007/s40471-014-0028-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Conducting research to identify modifiable risk factors for birth defects is difficult for a variety of reasons. While some challenges are familiar to researchers across many disciplines, the confluence of issues affecting birth defects research may not be well understood by those outside of the field. This article describes several methodological challenges to the study of birth defects and ways these challenges might be addressed: (1) ascertainment, definition and classification of birth defects; (2) exposure assessment on modifiable risk factors; (3) analytical challenges related to small numbers and multiple statistical tests; (4) the role of genetics, including the collection of specimens and analysis of genetic data; and (5) challenges in translating research and demonstrating public health impact. Understanding these issues is important for researchers planning studies, reviewers evaluating the scientific merit of results from these studies, and consumers of the research, including fellow researchers, policy makers, health care providers, and families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C. Tinker
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS E86, Atlanta, GA 30333, Phone: 404-498-3509, Fax: 404-498-3040
| | - Suzanne Gilboa
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS E86, Atlanta, GA 30333, Phone: 404-498-4425, Fax: 404-498-3040
| | - Jennita Reefhuis
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS E86, Atlanta, GA 30333, Phone: 404-498-3917, Fax: 404-498-3040
| | - Mary M. Jenkins
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS E86, Atlanta, GA 30333, Phone: 404-498-3889, Fax: 404-498-3550
| | - Marcy Schaeffer
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS E86, Atlanta, GA 30333, Phone: 404-498-0265, Fax: 404-498-3040
| | - Cynthia A. Moore
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS E86, Atlanta, GA 30333, Phone: 404-498-3927, Fax: 404-498-3040
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Consent procedures in pediatric biobanks. Eur J Hum Genet 2014; 23:1129-34. [PMID: 25537361 PMCID: PMC4538194 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2014] [Revised: 09/17/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The inclusion of children's samples in biobanks brings forward specific ethical issues. Guidelines indicate that children should be involved in the consent procedure. It is, however, unclear how to allocate an appropriate role for children. Knowledge of current practice will be helpful in addressing this issue. Therefore, we conducted an international multiple-case study on the child's role in consent procedures in pediatric biobanks. Four biobanks were included: (1) LifeLines, (2) Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy (PIAMA), (3) Young-HUNT3 and (4) the Oxford Radcliffe Biobank contribution to the Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group tissue bank (ORB/CCLG). Four themes linked to the child's role in the consent procedure emerged from the multiple-case study: (1) motives to involve the child, (2) informing the child, (3) the role of dissent, assent and consent and (4) voluntariness of children to participate. We conclude that biobank characteristics influence the biobank's motives to include children in the consent procedure. Moreover, the motives to include children influence how the children are involved in the consent procedure, and the extent to which children are able to make voluntary decisions as part of the consent procedure. This insight is valuable when designing pediatric biobank governance.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abdul-Karim R, Berkman BE, Wendler D, Rid A, Khan J, Badgett T, Hull SC. Disclosure of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing in pediatric genomic research. Pediatrics 2013; 131:564-71. [PMID: 23400601 PMCID: PMC3581837 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-0084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2012] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing technologies will likely be used with increasing frequency in pediatric research. One consequence will be the increased identification of individual genomic research findings that are incidental to the aims of the research. Although researchers and ethicists have raised theoretical concerns about incidental findings in the context of genetic research, next-generation sequencing will make this once largely hypothetical concern an increasing reality. Most commentators have begun to accept the notion that there is some duty to disclose individual genetic research results to research subjects; however, the scope of that duty remains unclear. These issues are especially complicated in the pediatric setting, where subjects cannot currently but typically will eventually be able to make their own medical decisions at the age of adulthood. This article discusses the management of incidental findings in the context of pediatric genomic research. We provide an overview of the current literature and propose a framework to manage incidental findings in this unique context, based on what we believe is a limited responsibility to disclose. We hope this will be a useful source of guidance for investigators, institutional review boards, and bioethicists that anticipates the complicated ethical issues raised by advances in genomic technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benjamin E. Berkman
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center
- Office of the Clinical Director, National Human Genome Research Institute, and
| | | | - Annette Rid
- Department of Social Science, Health, and Medicine, King’s College, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Javed Khan
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda Maryland
| | - Tom Badgett
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Sara Chandros Hull
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center
- Office of the Clinical Director, National Human Genome Research Institute, and
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tercyak KP, Swartling U, Mays D, Johnson SB, Ludvigsson J. Behavioral Science Research Informs Bioethical Issues in the Conduct of Large-Scale Studies of Children's Disease Risk. AJOB PRIMARY RESEARCH 2013; 4:4-14. [PMID: 23977442 DOI: 10.1080/21507716.2013.806968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Birth cohort studies of the natural history of pediatric common disease risk raise many bioethical issues, including re-consenting participants over time as children mature and cohort retention. Understanding participants' study-specific knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behavior may offer insights into these issues from a psychological perspective. METHODS We conducted an analysis of factors associated with parent-child communication about minor children's participation in a population-based birth cohort; children's knowledge about their own participation; and parental willingness to be re-contacted for future study among Swedish parents (N = 3,605) of children originally enrolled at birth in a prospective study of type 1 diabetes risk. RESULTS More open parent-child communication about disease risk screening research and greater knowledge among children about their own research participation facilitated greater parent willingness to participate in further study. Parents' decisions about further study participation were most strongly favorable among those who communicated openly with their child and with high study-specific knowledge. CONCLUSIONS Epidemiologists, bioethicists, and others involved in the design and conduct of large-scale, prospective birth cohorts may consider embedding periodic assessments of participants' study-specific attitudes and behavior to address long-term retention and willingness to engage in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth P Tercyak
- Associate Professor, Director of Behavioral Prevention Research, Division of Population Sciences, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100 Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
McGregor TL, Van Driest SL, Brothers KB, Bowton EA, Muglia LJ, Roden DM. Inclusion of pediatric samples in an opt-out biorepository linking DNA to de-identified medical records: pediatric BioVU. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012; 93:204-11. [PMID: 23281421 DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2012.230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The Vanderbilt DNA repository, BioVU, links DNA from leftover clinical blood samples to de-identified electronic medical records (EMRs). After initiating adult sample collection, pediatric extension required consideration of ethical concerns specific to pediatrics and implementation of specialized DNA extraction methods. In the first year of pediatric sample collection, more than 11,000 samples from individuals younger than 18 years were included. We compared data from the pediatric BioVU cohort with those from the overall Vanderbilt University Medical Center pediatric population and found similar demographic characteristics; however, the BioVU cohort had higher rates of select diseases, medication exposures, and laboratory testing, demonstrating enriched representation of severe or chronic disease. The fact that the sample accumulation is not balanced may accelerate research in some cohorts while limiting the study of relatively benign conditions and the accrual of unaffected and unbiased control samples. BioVU represents a feasible model for pediatric DNA biobanking but involves both ethical and practical considerations specific to the pediatric population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T L McGregor
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University and the Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hens K, Van El CE, Borry P, Cambon-Thomsen A, Cornel MC, Forzano F, Lucassen A, Patch C, Tranebjaerg L, Vermeulen E, Salvaterra E, Tibben A, Dierickx K. Developing a policy for paediatric biobanks: principles for good practice. Eur J Hum Genet 2012; 21:2-7. [PMID: 22713814 PMCID: PMC3533257 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.99] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The participation of minors in biobank research can offer great benefits for science and
health care. However, as minors are a vulnerable population they are also in need of
adequate protective measures when they are enrolled in research. Research using biobanked
biological samples from children poses additional ethical issues to those raised by
research using adult biobanks. For example, small children have only limited capacity, if
any, to understand the meaning and implications of the research and to give a documented
agreement to it. Older minors are gradually acquiring this capacity. We describe
principles for good practice related to the inclusion of minors in biobank research,
focusing on issues related to benefits and subsidiarity, consent, proportionality and
return of results. Some of these issues are currently heavily debated, and we conclude by
providing principles for good practice for policy makers of biobanks, researchers and
anyone involved in dealing with stored tissue samples from children. Actual implementation
of the principles will vary according to different jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristien Hens
- Health, Ethics and Society, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genomic biorepositories will be important tools to help unravel the effect of common genetic variants on risk for common pediatric diseases. Our objective was to explore how parents would respond to the inclusion of children in an opt-out model biobank. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with parents in hospital-based pediatric clinics. Participants responded to a description of a biorepository already collecting samples from adults. Two coders independently analyzed and coded interviews using framework analysis. Opt-out forms were later piloted in a clinic area. Parental opt-out choices were recorded electronically, with opt-out rates reported here. RESULTS: Parents strongly supported medical research in general and expressed a high level of trust that Vanderbilt University would keep their child's medical information private. Parents were more likely to allow their child's sample to be included in the biorepository than to allow their child to participate in a hypothetical study that would not help or harm their child, but might help other children. Only a minority were able to volunteer a concern raised by the description of the biobank. The opt-out rate was initially high compared with the opt-out rate in the adult biorepository, but after the first week decreased to near the baseline in adult clinics. CONCLUSION: Parents in our study generally support an opt-out model biobank in children. Most would allow their own child's sample to be included. Institutions seeking to build pediatric biobanks may consider the human non-subjects model as a viable alternative to traditional human-subjects biobanks.
Collapse
|
22
|
Chan TW, Mackey S, Hegney DG. Patients' experiences on donation of their residual biological samples and the impact of these experiences on the type of consent given for the future research use of the tissue: a systematic review. INT J EVID-BASED HEA 2012; 10:9-26. [PMID: 22405414 DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00251.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM This review aimed to critically appraise, synthesise and present the best available evidence related to the experiences of patients who have donated their residual biological samples and the impact of this experience on the type of consent given for future research use of these tissues. METHOD The three-step search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies published in English between 1990 and 2010 in electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, Mednar, PROQUEST). Using the standardised data extraction tool from the Joanna Briggs Institute, the Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument, 131 findings were extracted from the 18 papers included in this review. These findings generated 19 categories and four synthesised findings. RESULTS The synthesised findings generated were related to the different stages of the handling of leftover tissue. The first synthesised finding: patient consent to the use of leftover tissue is a complex interaction between many factors and not solely driven by perceptions of benefits to self or others, relates to the collection of the leftover tissue - the initial consent process. The second synthesised finding: healthcare institutions and regulatory authorities must provide clear and transparent safeguards and controls, and communicate these to the patient prior to the consenting process, outlines the issues affecting consent during the processing and storage of the tissues in biobanks or research institutions. The third synthesised finding: views on ownership and rights to the further use of the leftover tissue varies between individual patients and influences their willingness to consent to further use, demonstrates the concerns relating to the safeguards on the collection and storage of leftover tissue. The fourth synthesised finding: patients have opposing views on the use of their leftover tissue for commercial purposes, reflecting the differing community beliefs around using leftover tissue for research which may provide a commercial benefit to some, but not all, the community. CONCLUSION For leftover tissues to be used, patients must clearly understand: the type of consent they are providing (opt in or opt out); the parameters for the future research use of their leftover tissues; the safeguards put into place to protect the individual and the donated tissue from unethical use; and the commercial implications of their consent. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This review provides information on patient's experiences on the collection, storage, distribution and future use of leftover tissue. These preferences need to be understood when designing a prospective model of consent regimen which respects patient's confidentiality and wishes. The information in this review is especially important for policy-makers designing a prospective model of consent regimen for the use of existing and previously collected biological samples with no consent taken. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH Further research is needed to ascertain what factors specifically influence patient's willingness to consent for the use of leftover tissue. Factors for further exploration include the effects of culture, religion and age. Additionally, further research is required to inform the development of specific consent regimes for the use of leftover tissue for commercial, stem cell and genetic research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuck Wai Chan
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tabor HK, Brazg T, Crouch J, Namey EE, Fullerton SM, Beskow LM, Wilfond BS. Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2012; 6:41-52. [PMID: 22228059 DOI: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
As genetic research is increasingly conducted in children, it is important to understand how parents make decisions about enrolling their children and what they think about receiving their children's genetic research results. We conducted semi-structured phone interviews with 23 parents of children enrolled in genetic studies of autism or diabetes. Qualitative thematic analysis focused on two important components of genetic research and genotype-driven recruitment: participation in genetic research and return of results. Our findings suggest that parents' preferences and perspectives may be specific to their child's disease and the needs of the family as a whole. Assessing the expectations of target research populations will be beneficial for developing best practices for pediatric genetic research, return of results, and genotype-driven recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly K Tabor
- Seattle Children's Research Institute University of Washington, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, 1900 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Paediatric biobanks store and organise the biological material of children. They are an invaluable resource for the study of the development, health and behaviour of children. International norms for the management of adult biobanks exist, but paediatric biobanks require distinct policies to account for the needs of children, their general incapacity, and their intellectual development throughout the life of the biobank. Because of their particular nature we revisit the issues of consent, the return of research results, and privacy, and discuss how each could be modulated in the paediatric context. We recognize that such modifications entail further financial and logistical complications but maintain that it is essential that paediatric biobanks consider these issues and adapt their biobanks management policies accordingly, rather than extrapolate the current adult-based norms and jeopardise the rights of child participants.
Collapse
|
25
|
Salvaterra E, Giorda R, Bassi MT, Borgatti R, Knudsen LE, Martinuzzi A, Nobile M, Pozzoli U, Ramelli GP, Reni GL, Rivolta D, Stazi MA, Strazzer S, Thijs C, Toccaceli V, Trabacca A, Turconi AC, Zanini S, Zucca C, Bresolin N, Lenzi On Behalf Of The Pediatric Biobank Elsi Working Group L. Pediatric biobanking: a pilot qualitative survey of practices, rules, and researcher opinions in ten European countries. Biopreserv Biobank 2011; 10:29-36. [PMID: 24849751 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2011.0037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Ethical, legal, and social issues related to the collection, storage, and use of biospecimens and data derived from children raise critical concerns in the international debate. So far, a number of studies have considered a variety of the individual issues crucial to pediatric biobanking such as decision making, privacy protection, minor recontact, and research withdrawal by focusing on theoretical or empirical perspectives. Our research attempted to analyze such issues in a comprehensive manner by exploring practices, rules, and researcher opinions regarding proxy consent, minor assent, specimens and data handling, and return of results as faced in 10 European countries. Because of the lack of comparative analyses of these topics, a pilot study was designed. Following a qualitative methodology, a questionnaire draft mostly including open-ended queries was developed, tested, and sent by e-mail to a selected group of researchers dealing with pediatric biobanking (n=57). Returned questionnaires (n=31) highlighted that the collection, storage, distribution, and use of biospecimens and data from children were widely practiced in the contacted laboratories. In most cases, pediatric biobanking was subjected to national or local regulations covering adult biobanks (n=26). Informed consent was generally given by parents or legal representatives (n=17). Children's opinions were frequently sought and taken into account (n=16). However, minors were usually not recontacted at the age of maturity to express their own choices (n=26). Based on the collected data, dedicated recommendations are needed to govern unique ethical and regulatory issues surrounding pediatric biobanking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Salvaterra
- 1 Unit of Bioethics, Scientific Institute "E. Medea," Associazione La Nostra, Famiglia, via Don L. Monza, Bosisio Parini (LC), Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hens K, Lévesque E, Dierickx K. Children and biobanks: a review of the ethical and legal discussion. Hum Genet 2011; 130:403-13. [PMID: 21660506 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-011-1031-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2011] [Accepted: 06/02/2011] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The use of tissue samples from children is vital to genetic research. Collections of such tissue, in so-called biobanks, can take the form of large-scale prospective cohort studies or disease-specific studies using tissue of children with that specific disease. Collections of samples gathered in a diagnostics context, such as blood spot cards, can also be used for genetic research. Research on stored tissue samples from children poses ethical questions that are different from those posed by the use of samples from adults. Also, the ethical questions raised by the participation of children in biobanks are not analogous to those raised by the participation of children in clinical trials. In this review we first give an overview of the international ethical guidelines and legal regulations concerning biobanking and minors. Next, we review the different themes that occur in the ethical literature on this subject. Specifically we focus on questions of risk and benefit, consent and assent and the return of individual results. We also discuss the concept of solidarity, which is a relatively new concept in the context of children and biomedical research. To conclude, we discuss the gaps and questions raised by the review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristien Hens
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Box 7001, Kapucijnenvoer 35/3, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hens K, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, Dierickx K. Risks, benefits, solidarity: a framework for the participation of children in genetic biobank research. J Pediatr 2011; 158:842-8. [PMID: 21349539 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.12.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2010] [Revised: 12/06/2010] [Accepted: 12/23/2010] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kristien Hens
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
The use of stored tissue samples from children for genetic research raises specific ethical questions that are not all analogous to those raised when adult participants are concerned. These include issues with regard to consent, as it is typically a parent who consents to the use of samples from children. In this paper, we discuss the scope of parental consent. This scope has a temporal dimension and one related to the content of consent. It is not questioned that the temporal scope of parental consent is limited and that young adults have the right to decide on the fate of their samples when they reach the age of maturity. With regard to the content of consent, the question remains whether parents are allowed to give full broad consent to any possible future research on the samples of their children. We argue that they should not be allowed to do so, based on two premises. First, it is generally acknowledged that children have a right to express their own values and that they should be given the opportunity to develop their own autonomy as they grow older. Second, research and science are not completely value-free and some types of research may be more sensitive than other types. Children should be given the opportunity to express their values also in this respect.
Collapse
|