Long-term effects of second cochlear implantation with sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in Japanese children

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to longitudinally evaluate speech perception ability and sound-field thresholds with the first, second, or bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) and MAP parameters of second CI in children.

METHODS

Eighteen children who underwent bilateral cochlear implantation at Kyoto University Hospital were included. We evaluated speech perception under quiet and noisy conditions using the first, second, or bilateral CIs, CI-aided sound-field thresholds using the first or second CI, and MAP parameter values (C-levels, T-levels, and dynamic range) of the second CI of more than 5 years after the second implantation.

RESULTS

Patients with a second CI after 7 years of age had significantly worse speech perception ability with the second CI even long after the surgery than those with a second CI before 7 years of age. CI-aided sound-field thresholds using the first or second CI were similar, regardless of the second implantation timing. Speech perception in noise with bilateral CIs was enhanced by the addition of a second CI, even after 7 years of age. Patients undergoing second cochlear implantation before 3.5 years of age showed significantly higher C-levels and wider dynamic ranges in the second CI MAP parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

When the second implantation was performed after 7 years of age, the second CI effects were limited even with long-term use, which is attributed to unstable MAP parameters. The second CI-aided sound-field threshold contributed to the better outcome of bilateral CIs in noise, even if the second implantation was performed at age of ≥7 years.

Speech Perception of Second Cochlear Implant after 6 Years of Age in Prelingually Deaf Children

Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children becomes less effective as the inter-implant interval increases. However, the cause of this and the age at which speech perception becomes impossible are unclear. We examined the cases of 11 prelingually deaf children who underwent unilateral cochlear implantation at our hospitals before the age of 5 years old, followed by a second implantation procedure on the contralateral side when they were aged ≥ 6 years old (6-12 years old). The subjects' hearing thresholds and speech discrimination scores for the second cochlear implant were evaluated at 3 postoperative months and 1-7 years. All of the subjects demonstrated improvements in their hearing thresholds to a mean of 30 dB HL at 1 year. Regarding speech perception, one patient (a 12-year-old), who had developed bilateral hearing loss at 30 months of age after contracting mumps, demonstrated a 90% improvement in his speech discrimination score at 1 year. However, among the other congenitally deaf children, there were two patients whose speech discrimination scores had improved by ≥ 80% at > 4 postoperative years. The congenitally deaf children exhibited poor speech perception despite showing improved hearing thresholds in the ears that received second cochlear implants. Assuming that the auditory pathway beyond the superior olivary complex remained functional, the reduced speech perception abilities associated with the second cochlear implants may have been attributable to the loss of the spiral ganglion and cochlear nucleus cells due to a lack of auditory input since birth.

Sequential bilateral cochlear implant: long-term speech perception results in children first implanted at an early age

PURPOSE

The study aims to assess the benefit of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with congenital bilateral profound hearing loss, submitted to the first implant at an early age.

METHODS

We enrolled all the bilateral sequential cochlear implanted children who received the first implant within 48 months and the second within 12 years of age at our Institution. The children were submitted to disyllabic word recognition tests and Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) assessment using the OLSA matrix sentence test with the first implanted device (CI1), with the second implanted device (CI2), and with both devices (CIbil). Furthermore, we measured the datalogging of both devices. Then we calculated the binaural SRT gain (b-SRTgain) and checked the correlations between speech perception results and the b-SRTgain with the child's age at CI1 and CI2, DELTA and the datalogging reports.

RESULTS

With the bilateral electric stimulation, we found a significant improvement in disyllabic word recognition scores and in SRT. Moreover, the datalogging showed no significant differences in the time of use of CI1 and CI2. We found significant negative correlations between speech perception abilities with CI2 and age at CI2 and DELTA, and between the SRT with CI1 and the b-SRTgain.

CONCLUSIONS

From this study we can conclude that in a sequential CI procedure, even if a short inter-implant delay and lower ages at the second surgery can lead to better speech perception with CI2, children can benefit from bilateral stimulation independently of age at the second surgery and the DELTA.

Benefit of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children between 5 to 18 years old: A prospective cohort study

Objective

To determine the benefit of sequential cochlear implantation after a long inter-implantation interval in children with bilateral deafness receiving their second implant between 5 and 18 years of age.

Study design

Prospective cohort-study.

Setting

Tertiary multicenter.

Patients

85 children with bilateral deafness and unilateral implantation receiving a contralateral cochlear implant at the age of 5 to 18 years.

Method

The primary outcomes were speech recognition in quiet and noise (CVC) scores. The secondary outcomes were language outcomes and subjective hearing abilities, all measured before and 12 months after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation. Medians of the paired data were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Univariable linear regression analyses was used to analyze associations between variables and performance outcomes.

Results

A significant benefit was found for speech recognition in quiet (96% [89–98] vs 91% [85–96]; p < 0.01) and noise (65% [57–75] vs 54% [47–71]; p = 0.01) in the bilateral CI condition compared to unilateral (n = 75, excluded 10 non-users). No benefit was seen for language outcomes. The subjective sound quality score was statistically significant higher in bilateral compared to the unilateral CI condition. Pre-operative residual hearing level in the ear of the second implant, the inter-implant interval and age at time of second implantation was not significantly associated with performance scores.

Conclusion

After 12 months of use, sequential bilateral cochlear implantation showed improved speech perception in quiet and noise and improved subjective sound quality outcomes in children despite a great inter-implantation interval (median of 8 years [range 1–16 years]).

Effects of Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children: Evidence from Speech-Evoked Cortical Potentials and Tests of Speech Perception

INTRODUCTION

Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants (CI) may be compromised by delays to implantation of either ear. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sequential bilateral CI use in children who received their first CI at young ages, using a clinical set-up.

METHODS

One-channel cortical auditory evoked potentials and speech perception in quiet and noise were evoked at repeated times (0, 3, 6, 12 months of bilateral CI use) by unilateral and bilateral stimulation in 28 children with early-onset deafness. These children were unilaterally implanted before 3.69 years of age (mean ± SD of 1.98 ± 0.73 years) and received a second CI after 5.13 ± 2.37 years of unilateral CI use. Comparisons between unilaterally evoked responses were used to measure asymmetric function between the ears and comparisons between bilateral responses and each unilateral response were used to measure the bilateral benefit.

RESULTS

Chronic bilateral CI promoted changes in cortical auditory responses and speech perception performance; however, large asymmetries were present between the two unilateral responses despite ongoing bilateral CI use. Persistent cortical differences between the two sides at 1 year of bilateral stimulation were predicted by increasing age at the first surgery and inter-implant delay. Larger asymmetries in speech perception occurred with longer inter-implant delays. Bilateral responses were more similar to the unilateral responses from the first rather than the second CI.

CONCLUSION

These findings are consistent with the development of the aural preference syndrome and reinforce the importance of providing bilateral CIs simultaneously or sequentially with very short delays.

Factors affecting phoneme discrimination in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of a number of variables on phoneme discrimination (PD) performance in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants (SeqBiCIs) and compare PD performance between the 2 implantation sides and between children with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) and their age-matched peers with normal hearing (NH).

DESIGN

All participants completed the Auditory Speech Sound Evaluation Phoneme Discrimination Test.

STUDY SAMPLE

The sample included 23 children with SeqBiCIs as the study group and 23 with NH as the control group.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found between the scores of the two groups under the CI₁ and CI₂ conditions (p = 0.001), CI₁ and BiCI conditions (p = 0.002), and CI₂ and BiCI conditions (p = 0.001). PD scores with CI₁ significantly depend on age at CI₁ and duration of bilateral use. PD scores with CI₁ were significant predictors of PD performance with CI₂. Duration of BiCI use was a significant predictor of PD scores with BiCI.

CONCLUSIONS

The age at CI₁ and the duration of bilateral cochlear implant use were found to improve phoneme discrimination performance in children with a sequential bilateral cochlear implant. According to the success of the CI₁, it is possible to predict the success of CI₂ use.

Changes in electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study is to investigate whether the electrical stimulation of the second ear causes a difference in electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (eABR) between two ears over time.

METHODS

The study included thirteen subjects under the age of five who used cochlear implants for at least six months in the first ear prior to the sequential cochlear implantation. Postoperative eABRs were conducted on the 1st (first fitting of the second speech processor), 3rd, and 6th months of the second implantation in the basal, medial, and apical electrode positions. The recording was started with the second cochlear implant (CI2), and then the first cochlear implant (CI1) was tested. Sound field audiometry and receptive/expressive language assessments were also performed at 1 and 6 months after the second cochlear implantation.

RESULTS

eABR results indicate that when eV wave latencies are examined for all electrodes, CI2 is significantly longer than CI1 (p < 0.05). When eV wave amplitudes are examined for all electrodes, CI1 is significantly higher than the CI2 (p < 0.05). eV latency and amplitude changes between both implants were examined up to six months after implantation. Statistically significant changes were observed in the basal, medial, apical electrode for eV wave latencies, and only in the medial electrode for eV wave amplitudes (p < 0.05). Average sound field thresholds and receptive/expressive language scores improved statistically significantly for all subjects at the end of the study (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The postoperative eABR test is a valuable test battery that provides the clinician with important ideas about the estimated threshold, comfortable and audible sound level, CI performance, and auditory pathways up to the brainstem. Since the maturation is still ongoing, an extended period longer than six months is needed to evaluate interaural differences.

Child- and Environment-Related Factors Influencing Daily Cochlear Implant Use: A Datalog Study

OBJECTIVES

To understand the varying levels of daily cochlear implant (CI) use in children, previous studies have investigated factors that may be of influence. The objective of this study was to investigate the degree with which new child-related and environment-related characteristics were associated with consistent CI use.

DESIGN

The design of this study was retrospective. Data were reviewed of 81 children (51% females, mean age 6.4 years with a range of 1.3 to 17.7 years) who received a CI between 2012 and 2019. Developmental status, quantified burden of comorbidity, hearing experience, and hearing environment were investigated for correlation with consistency in daily CI use. The CIs datalog was used to objectively record the wearing times. Associations were examined using univariate correlation analyses and a linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

On average, the CI was worn 8.6 hr per day and 59% of the children wore it more than 8 hr daily. The latter children's hearing performance was significantly higher than that of the others. Consistency in CI use correlated significantly with the child-related characteristics chronological age, nonverbal intelligence quotient (IQ), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class, pre CI acoustic experience, CI experience, and one of the environment related characteristics "parental communication mode." In a multivariate linear regression model, consistency in CI use was significantly dependent on nonverbal IQ and parental communication mode. These together accounted for 47% of the variation in daily CI use.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that children with lower nonverbal IQ scores and low exposure to oral communication by their parents are at risk of inconsistent CI use.

Spatial Release From Masking in 2-Year-Olds With Normal Hearing and With Bilateral Cochlear Implants

This study evaluated spatial release from masking (SRM) in 2- to 3-year-old children who are deaf and were implanted with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs), and in age-matched normal-hearing (NH) toddlers. Here, we examined whether early activation of bilateral hearing has the potential to promote SRM that is similar to age-matched NH children. Listeners were 13 NH toddlers and 13 toddlers with BiCIs, ages 27 to 36 months. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured for target speech in front (0°) and for competitors that were either Colocated in front (0°) or Separated toward the right (+90°). SRM was computed as the difference between SRTs in the front versus in the asymmetrical condition. Results show that SRTs were higher in the BiCI than NH group in all conditions. Both groups had higher SRTs in the Colocated and Separated conditions compared with Quiet, indicating masking. SRM was significant only in the NH group. In the BiCI group, the group effect of SRM was not significant, likely limited by the small sample size; however, all but two children had SRM values within the NH range. This work shows that to some extent, the ability to use spatial cues for source segregation develops by age 2 to 3 in NH children and is attainable in most of the children in the BiCI group. There is potential for the paradigm used here to be used in clinical settings to evaluate outcomes of bilateral hearing in very young children.

Limiting asymmetric hearing improves benefits of bilateral hearing in children using cochlear implants

Neurodevelopmental changes occur with asymmetric hearing loss, limiting binaural/spatial hearing and putting children at risk for social and educational challenges. These deficits may be mitigated by providing bilateral hearing in children through auditory prostheses. Effects on speech perception and spatial hearing were measured in a large cohort of >450 children who were deaf and used bilateral cochlear implants or bimodal devices (one cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid). Results revealed an advantage of bilateral over unilateral device use but this advantage decreased as hearing in the two ears became increasingly asymmetric. Delayed implantation of an ear with severe to profound deafness allowed asymmetric hearing, creating aural preference for the better hearing ear. These findings indicate that bilateral input with the most appropriate device for each ear should be provided early and without delay during development.

Speech Detection in Noise for Young Bilaterally Implanted Children: Is There Evidence of Binaural Benefit Over the Shadowed Ear Alone?

OBJECTIVES

To measure binaural benefit over the shadowed ear alone for young bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users. It was hypothesized that children who received bilateral CIs at a young age (<4 years), and had significant bilateral experience, would demonstrate lower detection thresholds for speech sounds in background noise in the bilateral CI over the unilateral CI condition when the added CI was ipsilateral to the noise source.

DESIGN

Children receiving bilateral CIs at the Eye and Ear Hospital Clinic in Melbourne were invited to participate in a wider research project evaluating outcomes; those participating in the wider project who were bilaterally implanted by 4 years and were approximately 2 years postoperative were included in the present study. For 20 participants, detection signal to noise ratios (SNRs) were measured for speech presented from in front and noise from 90° in at least 3 of 4 device/noise conditions, namely left CI/noise right and right CI/noise left, plus bilateral CIs/noise right and bilateral CIs/noise left.

RESULTS

As some participants could only complete testing in 3 conditions within the 1 test block, the unilateral versus bilateral comparison was performed for 1 CI (i.e., 1 noise direction) for 15 participants and for both CIs (i.e., noise left and noise right) for 5 participants. Group analysis indicated no significant difference in detection SNR between the unilateral and bilateral CI conditions when adding the left CI or right CI (for the overall group) or when adding the first or second CI (for the 15 participants with sequential bilateral CIs). Separate analyses indicated no significant difference in detection SNR between the unilateral and bilateral CI conditions for the majority of individuals; this occurred irrespective of whether the analysis indicated that the CI added in the bilateral condition was poorer-performing, better-performing, or not significantly different compared with the other CI. Four individuals demonstrated a significant improvement in the bilateral condition when the CI added in the bilateral condition was a better-performing (n = 1), poorer-performing (n = 2), or not significantly different CI (n = 1). There was no relationship between the detection SNR difference between each CI and the detection SNR difference between the unilateral and bilateral conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The hypothesis of a lower detection SNR in the bilateral condition was not supported by the group results or by the results for the majority of individuals. For the 4 participants who did demonstrate benefit over the shadowed ear alone, that benefit cannot be separated from the potential benefit gained as a result of the CI added in the bilateral condition being the better-performing CI for 1 of the 4. Variation in outcomes could not be related to demographic factors for this group, which was relatively homogeneous for age at bilateral CI and experience; an older, more experienced group may demonstrate greater binaural benefit in these conditions. These results can be used during counseling for families regarding postoperative expectations for young children, especially in the first 2 years.

Perceived improvements and challenges following sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children and adults

OBJECTIVE

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear-implant (biCI) recipients to examine functional aspects of communication that are affected by listening with one versus two CIs.

DESIGN

Participants were 15 adult biCI recipients and parents of 30 children (categorized into three groups by age) with biCIs. All CI users had sequential placement of biCIs with at least six months' experience with the first CI before activation of the second device, and at least three months' experience with both CIs prior to the interview. The parent/paediatric and adult interviews were all conducted by the same examiner. Electronic transcripts of the interview responses were coded for perceived changes or lack thereof in 23 behaviours following biCI. Extent of reported benefit was quantified for each subject within and across these behaviours and at the group level as a function of age.

RESULTS

Most adults and parents of children reported multiple functional changes following biCI use, and changes often translated to enhanced social communication. Nearly all participants were consistent users of biCIs, and were satisfied with their perceived gains in communicating in everyday settings. Most reported ongoing challenges listening in noisy settings. Although many reports on children paralleled those of adults, developmental differences were apparent. Thirteen percent of adults and twenty percent of parents of children in each of the respective groups reported low levels of change.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that many biCI users experience meaningful functional benefits that may be underestimated by traditional outcome measures. We suggest the need to expand measurement approaches to better quantify the nature of these benefits.

Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants: Developmental advances do not yet achieve normal cortical processing

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation promotes symmetric development of bilateral auditory pathways but binaural hearing remains abnormal. To evaluate whether bilateral cortical processing remains impaired in such children, cortical activity to unilateral and bilateral stimuli was assessed in a unique cohort of 16 children who received bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) simultaneously at 1.97 ± 0.86 years of age and had ~4 years of CI experience, providing the first opportunity to assess electrically driven cortical development in the absence of reorganized asymmetries from sequential implantation.

METHODS

Cortical activity to unilateral and bilateral stimuli was measured using multichannel electro-encephalography. Cortical processing in children with bilateral CIs was compared with click-elicited activity in 13 normal hearing children matched for time-in-sound. Source activity was localized using the Time Restricted, Artefact and Coherence source Suppression (TRACS) beamformer method.

RESULTS

Consistent with dominant crossed auditory pathways, normal P1 activity (~100 ms) was weaker to ipsilateral stimuli relative to contralateral and bilateral stimuli and both auditory cortices preferentially responded to the contralateral ear. Right hemisphere dominance was evident overall. Children with bilateral CIs maintained the expected right dominance but differences from normal included: (i) minimal changes between ipsilateral, contralateral and bilateral stimuli, (ii) weaker than normal contralateral stimulus preference, (iii) symmetric activity to bilateral stimuli, and (iv) increased occipital lobe recruitment during bilateral relative to unilateral stimulation. Between-group contrasts demonstrated lower than normal activity in the inferior parieto-occipital lobe (suggesting deficits in sensory integration) and greater than normal left frontal lobe activity (suggesting increased attention), even during passive listening.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, findings suggest that early simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation promotes normal-like auditory symmetry but that abnormalities in cortical processing consequent to deafness and/or electrical stimulation through two independent speech processors persist.

A Longitudinal Study in Children With Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Time Course for the Second Implanted Ear and Bilateral Performance

PURPOSE

Whether, and if so when, a second-ear cochlear implant should be provided to older, unilaterally implanted children is an ongoing clinical question. This study evaluated rate of speech recognition progress for the second implanted ear and with bilateral cochlear implants in older sequentially implanted children and evaluated localization abilities.

METHOD

A prospective longitudinal study included 24 bilaterally implanted children (mean ear surgeries at 5.11 and 14.25 years). Test intervals were every 3-6 months through 24 months postbilateral. Test conditions were each ear and bilaterally for speech recognition and localization.

RESULTS

Overall, the rate of progress for the second implanted ear was gradual. Improvements in quiet continued through the second year of bilateral use. Improvements in noise were more modest and leveled off during the second year. On all measures, results from the second ear were poorer than the first. Bilateral scores were better than either ear alone for all measures except sentences in quiet and localization.

CONCLUSIONS

Older sequentially implanted children with several years between surgeries may obtain speech understanding in the second implanted ear; however, performance may be limited and rate of progress gradual. Continued contralateral ear hearing aid use and reduced time between surgeries may enhance outcomes.

Benefits of simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation on verbal reasoning skills in prelingually deaf children

BACKGROUND

Impaired auditory speech perception abilities in deaf children with hearing aids compromised their verbal intelligence enormously. The availability of unilateral cochlear implantation (CI) auditory speech perception and spoken vocabulary enabled them to reach near ageappropriate levels. This holds especially for children in spoken language environments. However, speech perception in complex listening situations and the acquisition of complex verbal skills remains difficult. Bilateral CI was expected to enhance the acquisition of verbal intelligence by improved understanding of speech in noise.

METHODS

This study examined the effect of bilateral CI on verbal intelligence of 49 deaf children (3;5-8;0 years). Relations between speech perception in noise, auditory short-term memory and verbal intelligence were analysed with multiple linear regressions. In addition, the interaction of educational setting, mainstream or special, on these relations was analysed.

RESULTS

Children with bilateral CI obtained higher scores on verbal intelligence. Significant associations were present between speech perception in noise, auditory short-term memory and verbal intelligence.

CONCLUSION

Children with simultaneous bilateral CIs showed better speech perception in noise than children with unilateral CIs, which mediated by the auditory short-term memory capacity, enhanced the ability to acquire more complex verbal skills for BICI children in mainstream education.

Bilateral cochlear implants in children: Effects of auditory experience and deprivation on auditory perception

Spatial hearing skills are essential for children as they grow, learn and play. These skills provide critical cues for determining the locations of sources in the environment, and enable segregation of important sounds, such as speech, from background maskers or interferers. Spatial hearing depends on availability of monaural cues and binaural cues. The latter result from integration of inputs arriving at the two ears from sounds that vary in location. The binaural system has exquisite mechanisms for capturing differences between the ears in both time of arrival and intensity. The major cues that are thus referred to as being vital for binaural hearing are: interaural differences in time (ITDs) and interaural differences in levels (ILDs). In children with normal hearing (NH), spatial hearing abilities are fairly well developed by age 4-5 years. In contrast, most children who are deaf and hear through cochlear implants (CIs) do not have an opportunity to experience normal, binaural acoustic hearing early in life. These children may function by having to utilize auditory cues that are degraded with regard to numerous stimulus features. In recent years there has been a notable increase in the number of children receiving bilateral CIs, and evidence suggests that while having two CIs helps them function better than when listening through a single CI, these children generally perform worse than their NH peers. This paper reviews some of the recent work on bilaterally implanted children. The focus is on measures of spatial hearing, including sound localization, release from masking for speech understanding in noise and binaural sensitivity using research processors. Data from behavioral and electrophysiological studies are included, with a focus on the recent work of the authors and their collaborators. The effects of auditory plasticity and deprivation on the emergence of binaural and spatial hearing are discussed along with evidence for reorganized processing from both behavioral and electrophysiological studies. The consequences of both unilateral and bilateral auditory deprivation during development suggest that the relevant set of issues is highly complex with regard to successes and the limitations experienced by children receiving bilateral cochlear implants. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled .

The effect of device use after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: An electrophysiological approach

OBJECTIVES

In many studies evaluating the effect of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children, device use is not taken into account. In this study, however, device use was analyzed in relation to auditory brainstem maturation and speech recognition, which were measured in children with early-onset deafness, 5-6 years after bilateral cochlear implantation. We hypothesized that auditory brainstem maturation is mostly functionally driven by auditory stimulation and is therefore influenced by device use and not mainly by inter-implant delay.

METHODS

Twenty-one children participated and had inter-implant delays between 1.2 and 7.2 years. The electrically-evoked auditory brainstem response was measured for both implants separately. The difference in interaural wave V latency and speech recognition between both implants were used in the analyses. Device use was measured with a Likert scale.

RESULTS

Results showed that the less the second device is used, the larger the difference in interaural wave V latencies is, which consequently leads to larger differences in interaural speech recognition.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with early-onset deafness, after various periods of unilateral deprivation, full-time device use can lead to similar auditory brainstem responses and speech recognition between both ears. Therefore, device use should be considered as a relevant factor contributing to outcomes after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation. These results are indicative for a longer window between implantations in children with early-onset deafness to obtain symmetrical auditory pathway maturation than is mentioned in the literature. Results, however, must be interpreted as preliminary findings as actual device use with data logging was not yet available at the time of the study.

Current trends in outcome studies for children with hearing loss and the need to establish a comprehensive framework of measuring outcomes in children with hearing loss in China

Since the 1970s, outcome studies for children with hearing loss expanded from focusing on assessing auditory awareness and speech perception skills to evaluating language and speech development. Since the early 2000s, the multi-center large scale research systematically studied outcomes in the areas of auditory awareness, speech-perception, language development, speech development, educational achievements, cognitive development, and psychosocial development. These studies advocated the establishment of baseline and regular follow-up evaluations with a comprehensive framework centered on language development. Recent research interests also include understanding the vast differences in outcomes for children with hearing loss, understanding the relationships between neurocognitive development and language acquisition in children with hearing loss, and using outcome studies to guide evidence-based clinical practice. After the establishment of standardized Mandarin language assessments, outcomes research in Mainland China has the potential to expand beyond auditory awareness and speech perception studies.

The effect of early auditory experience on the spatial listening skills of children with bilateral cochlear implants

OBJECTIVES

Both electrophysiological and behavioural studies suggest that auditory deprivation during the first months and years of life can impair listening skills. Electrophysiological studies indicate that 3½ years may be a critical age for the development of symmetrical cortical responses in children using bilateral cochlear implants. This study aimed to examine the effect of auditory experience during the first 3½ years of life on the behavioural spatial listening abilities of children using bilateral cochlear implants, with reference to normally hearing children. Data collected during research and routine clinical testing were pooled to compare the listening skills of children with bilateral cochlear implants and different periods of auditory deprivation.

METHODS

Children aged 4-17 years with bilateral cochlear implants were classified into three groups. Children born profoundly deaf were in the congenital early bilateral group (received bilateral cochlear implants aged ≤3½ years, n=28) or congenital late bilateral group (received first implant aged ≤3½ years and second aged >3½ years, n=38). Children with some bilateral acoustic hearing until the age of 3½ years, who subsequently became profoundly deaf and received bilateral cochlear implants, were in the acquired/progressive group (n=16). There were 32 children in the normally hearing group. Children completed tests of sound-source localization and spatial release from masking (a measure of the ability to use both ears to understand speech in noise).

RESULTS

The acquired/progressive group localized more accurately than both groups of congenitally deaf children (p<0.05). All three groups of children with cochlear implants showed similar spatial release from masking. The normally hearing group localized more accurately than all groups with bilateral cochlear implants and displayed more spatial release from masking than the congenitally deaf groups on average (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Children with bilateral cochlear implants and early experience of acoustic hearing showed more accurate localization skills, on average, than children born profoundly deaf.

Changes in children's speech discrimination and spatial release from masking between 2 and 4 years after sequential cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE

To document changes in speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and spatial release from masking (SRM) for sequentially implanted children at 2 and 4 years after they received their second cochlear implant (CI2).

METHODS

Participants were 17 children who consistently used two sequentially implanted and optimally programmed CIs. SRTs were measured monaurally in quiet and binaurally in noise using the adaptive McCormick toy discrimination test. Speech signals were presented from 0° azimuth and noise from 0°, +90° or  -90° azimuth. SRM was calculated from SRTs in noise. Measurements were made at 2 and 4 year post-CI2.

RESULTS

There were significant improvements over time in SRTs in quiet, SRTs in noise and SRM. SRTs in quiet improved more for CI2 than for the first implant (CI1). SRTs in noise and SRM improved more when noise was presented closest to CI1 than when closest to CI2. Performance became more symmetrical over time.

DISCUSSION

Despite prolonged periods of unilateral auditory deprivation sequentially implanted children exhibited continued improvement in SRT and SRM. These results are valuable in setting expectations for and counselling families of children considering sequential CIs.

Long-term outcomes on spatial hearing, speech recognition and receptive vocabulary after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children

Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in profoundly deaf children often leads to primary advantages in spatial hearing and speech recognition. It is not yet known how these children develop in the long-term and if these primary advantages will also lead to secondary advantages, e.g. in better language skills. The aim of the present longitudinal cohort study was to assess the long-term effects of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children on spatial hearing, speech recognition in quiet and in noise and receptive vocabulary. Twenty-four children with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) were tested 5-6 years after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation. These children received their second implant between 2.4 and 8.5 years of age. Speech and language data were also gathered in a matched reference group of 26 children with a unilateral cochlear implant (UCI). Spatial hearing was assessed with a minimum audible angle (MAA) task with different stimulus types to gain global insight into the effective use of interaural level difference (ILD) and interaural timing difference (ITD) cues. In the long-term, children still showed improvements in spatial acuity. Spatial acuity was highest for ILD cues compared to ITD cues. For speech recognition in quiet and noise, and receptive vocabulary, children with BiCIs had significant higher scores than children with a UCI. Results also indicate that attending a mainstream school has a significant positive effect on speech recognition and receptive vocabulary compared to attending a school for the deaf. Despite of a period of unilateral deafness, children with BiCIs, participating in mainstream education obtained age-appropriate language scores.

Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects with an energetic or informational masker in bilateral and bimodal CI users

PURPOSE

The objective of the study was to investigate the influence of noise (energetic) and speech (energetic plus informational) maskers on the head shadow (HS), squelch (SQ), and binaural summation (SU) effect in bilateral and bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users.

METHOD

Speech recognition was measured in the presence of either a competing talker or modulated speech-shaped noise in 10 bimodal and 10 bilateral adult CI users. HS, SQ, and SU effects were calculated. The interfering signals were manipulated with respect to F0 to consider the influence of different speaker voices.

RESULTS

The effects HS, SQ, and SU differed depending on the type of masker. A detailed analysis of errors was used to dissociate energetic and informational masking effects. The analysis showed a release from energetic than from informational masking.

CONCLUSION

Noise interferers are not sufficient to reflect difficulties experienced with speech understanding in noise for bilateral and bimodal CI users.

Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: a systematic review and best-evidence synthesis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implantation over unilateral implantation in children with sensorineural hearing loss.

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

All studies comparing a bilateral cochlear implant group with a unilateral implant group were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies compared a bilateral cochlear implant group with a unilateral group. No randomized trials were identified. Due to the clinical heterogeneity, statistical pooling was not feasible and a best-evidence synthesis was performed. The results of this best-evidence synthesis indicate the positive effect of the second implant for especially sound localization and possibly for preverbal communication and language development. There was insufficient evidence to make a valid comparison between bilateral implantation and a bimodal fitting.

CONCLUSION

Although randomized trials are lacking, the results of our best-evidence synthesis indicate that the second cochlear implant might be especially useful in sound localization and possibly also in language development.

Pediatric cochlear implantation: candidacy evaluation, medical and surgical considerations, and expanding criteria

Since the first cochlear implant approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in the early 1980s, great advances have occurred in cochlear implant technology. With these advances, patient selection, preoperative evaluation, and rehabilitation consideration continue to evolve. This article describes the current practice in pediatric candidacy evaluation, reviews the medical and surgical considerations in pediatric cochlear implantation, and explores the expanding criteria for cochlear implantation within the pediatric population.

Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: parents' perspective and device use

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was (1) to measure parental expectations before surgery of a sequentially placed second cochlear implant and compare these results with parental observations postoperatively and (2) to measure device use of the second cochlear implant and compare to unilateral implant use.

METHODS

Thirty prelingually deaf children with a unilateral cochlear implant (mean age at first implant 1.8 years) received a second implant at a mean age of 5.3 years. To measure parental expectations and observations, parents completed the Parents' Perspective before surgery of the second implant and after 12 and 24 months. The questionnaire included 1 additional question on sound localization. Device use of both the first and second implants was assessed retrospectively after 6, 12 and 24 months of implant use. Device use of the study group was also compared to a reference group of 30 unilateral implant users matched for age at second implantation.

RESULTS

Parental expectations with regard to sound localization were significantly higher than the observed changes within the first year of bilateral implant use. The observed changes in communication, listening to speech without lipreading, and speech and language skills met or surpassed parental expectations. Irrespective of age at second implantation, the second implant was significantly less worn than the first implant. No significant difference was observed between the use of the second implant of the study group and device use of the reference group. Second implant use was significantly correlated with the difference in speech recognition between the 2 implants alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative parental expectations were too high with regard to the observed localization skills within the first year of bilateral implant use. The study showed that several of these sequentially implanted children had more difficulties in wearing the second implant than in wearing the first implant during the rehabilitation period. The present results suggest that this is caused by the dominant first implant performance. Such data are of high importance in order to provide parents with realistic counseling on what they can expect from sequential bilateral cochlear implantation.